$336 million: Rhode Island woman, 81, wins Powerball

Msnbc's Thomas Roberts reports on an 81-year-old woman who won $336 million dollars in the Rhode Island Powerball jackpot.

Louise White, 81, of Newport, R.I., is the winner of the third-largest Powerball jackpot in the history of the game: $336.4 million.

White came forward Tuesday morning and accepted the money on behalf of the Rainbow Sherbert Trust.

White's ticket, which cost $3, was the only ticket that matched all the numbers: 1-10-37-52-57 and Powerball 11. It was sold at the Stop & Shop supermarket at 250 Bellevue Ave. in Newport.

"I want to say that I'm very happy and I'm very proud. This will make my family very happy," White said at a news conference in Cranston. "We are truly blessed. Thank you."

Her lawyers called her a "vivacious octogenarian." The Rainbow Sherbert Trust is named after the dessert she purchased while buying the winning ticket. White said it is her son's favorite dessert.

White chose to accept the lump sum payment of $210 million, rather than the 30 payments paid out over 29 years. She will pay $52.5 million in federal taxes and more than $14 million in state taxes.

Rhode Island lottery officials said White's haul is the sixth largest among all lotteries in the United States. Her chances of hitting the PowerBall were 1 in 175 million.

The ticket price increased from $1 to $2 last month; it is $3 with the PowerPlay option. Rising sales nearly doubled the jackpot from $173.5 million on Feb. 1.

NBC News and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 12
Comment author avatarmike277Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Guess she doesn't need her social security checks anymore.

  • 57 votes
#1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:29 AM EST
Comment author avatarstarbuck49Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Why not, she EARNED it.

  • 84 votes
#1.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:36 AM EST

I hope she is not one of those who will keep working.

  • 21 votes
#1.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:36 AM EST
Comment author avatarRick-546746Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Actually Starbuck that's an illusion...within months or a few short years SS and medicare beneficiaries blow through their contributions plus even the most optiistic returns on their contributions..then all seniors become socialists eating up ever increasing amounts of the budget...and passing the bills on to their kids and grandkids...

  • 23 votes
#1.3 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:41 AM EST

Actually Rick, you're right. And the reason is because ever since WWII successive governments have found it was easier to spend the money and replace it with government IOU's (T-notes) than it was to actually invest it and get a return. Don't blame the people who worked their entire lives to enable the system. Blame the leeches in DC who disabled it.

  • 97 votes
#1.4 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:55 AM EST
Comment author avatarJS in SDExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

She is going to end up netting about $143.5 million from the jackpot. I certainly hope that she will donate a large chunk of that to worthy charities to help out those less fortunte than her, like maybe the people who lost everything in the outbreak of tornadoes in Indiana. It would be great to see her help out the woman who lost part of both legs saving her children from a tornado by getting her set up with prosthetics and rehab. The woman is certainly deserving of the help.

  • 16 votes
#1.5 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:08 PM EST

Rick

It's like an insurance policy for the aged. You pay premiums for your working life and then they pay you to have enough money in your non working years to live on. It is not a socialistic program.

  • 43 votes
#1.6 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:14 PM EST
Comment author avatarLiberal.but.turning.conservative!!!Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Good luck with that. She can help out her fellow blacks!!! Put me on the list lady. Give money to whitey.... thats a joke.

  • 9 votes
#1.7 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:16 PM EST

Why is it that everytime someone wins a lot of money, there are those whackjobs that pop out of the woodwork "hoping" that she donates a large portion of her win to a "worthy" cause? How dare you people attempt to persuade this woman how to spend HER MONEY...

She just might be her own worthy cause for all you know..

And Starbuck49? Reread Mikes original statement... he said, and I quote, "Guess she doesn't need her social security checks anymore.".... NEED Starbuck, not want, not deserve, or whether or not she EARNED THEM.. NEED... So his statement stands on its own merits.. no, I guess she doesn't NEED her social security any longer..

  • 64 votes
#1.8 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:18 PM EST

Starbuck, you serious? Insurance companies counts on making money from people who pay all their lives and stay healthy and also don't make claims... With S.S, EVERYONE makes a claim... It's definitly socialistic.

  • 6 votes
#1.9 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:21 PM EST

Auntie Louise it's me Schoolyard. You remember me, right.....Right?

  • 24 votes
#1.10 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:23 PM EST

You can call it whatever you want? I was forced into paying into the fund with the guarantee they would pay me in my golden years. Put your retirement into 401 k retirement funds and when the stock market goes down, you lost it all. I'm taking my ss retirement, my federal retirement for 20 years active duty, my state retirement for 20 years Guard duty and my private company retirement for General Dynamics. All at once and getting more now than what I was working. It's called good retirement managing.

If the las t4 presidents had kept their hands out of it, there would tyill be 2.3 trillion dollars in it for retirees.

  • 35 votes
#1.11 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:29 PM EST

If the last 4 presidents had kept their hands out of it, there would still be 2.3 trillion dollars in it for retirees

  • 26 votes
#1.12 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:39 PM EST

WTF. Leave this lady alone! She won the Powerball and now jackholes say she should give it to tornado victims and downing her because she WORKED HER WHOLE LIFE and collected S.S.

I have seen numerous articles about people winning Powerball jackpots and have seen NONE OF THESE nonsense posts on ANY OF THE OTHERS!

  • 39 votes
#1.13 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:40 PM EST

Your so right Rick. Let's just euthanize these lazy good for nothing seniors and be done with it. Actually I think that's part of the republican platform for destroying Social Security.

  • 22 votes
#1.14 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:42 PM EST

The lottery is rigged now people. All the states are going bankrupt so they are taking money from anywhere or just plain stealing it. Anyone who would wait a month to claim it would be losing about 200 grand in interest for that month. Cmon this is like the 5th trust to win a lottery with a big jackpot that waited to claim it. like the one that claimed it a year later and the displayed no emotion what so ever.

  • 5 votes
#1.15 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:47 PM EST

This article is about a very lucky women winning a very large Power Ball Jackpot. NOT Social Security..

Stay on subject.

Good luck to you Louise and live well and long!!

  • 44 votes
#1.16 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:48 PM EST

Yup they got some old lady to speak for them (the trust) to make it look legit. She hardly even showed any emotion just like that other trust that won. Jeez they dont even leave the lottery alone the greed is just amazing. Its just strange is all because I notice a big differance in the way the winners are acting than they did a few years back. Back then the emotion was very visible. This lady was as calm as ever she even looked a little nervous or guilty somehow.

  • 8 votes
#1.17 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:51 PM EST

Guy

She setup her own trust. Probably for her own family so they wouldn't blow their share all at once.

Rhode Island Governor Lincoln D. Chafee
commended her for her prudence in waiting to come forward until after she got
help and set up a trust.
'Not only were you lucky, you were very smart.
You took your time and you hired professionals, ' he said. 'You’re a lucky and
smart wom

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2111063/Powerballs-336-MILLION-winner-revealed-81-year-old-woman.html#ixzz1oMPJYmB8

  • 32 votes
#1.18 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:54 PM EST

The lottery is rigged now people. All the states are going bankrupt so they are taking money from anywhere or just plain stealing it. Anyone who would wait a month to claim it would be losing about 200 grand in interest for that month. Cmon this is like the 5th trust to win a lottery with a big jackpot that waited to claim it. like the one that claimed it a year later and the displayed no emotion what so ever.

I don't think you know what you're talking about. Taking the time to make sure you aren't going to get screwed over by some idiot gold digger is a lot more important than losing out on a small amount of interest.

  • 23 votes
#1.19 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:05 PM EST

I feel sorry for her, unless she was gravely ill without medical insurance. The life she know is over. Unknown familie members, new neighbors, will suddenly show up and suck up as "friends". Nobody will anymore look at her as just the woman next door, but see $$. If she is not strong and protected, many will try to take advantage of her. What a life. I would put it all in a trust fund and forget about it asap.

  • 8 votes
#1.20 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:05 PM EST

Hope she is one who says NO-she means NO. Otherwise her friends and relatives will quickly go through that money and then some.

It's known to happen...

  • 8 votes
#1.21 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:08 PM EST

...then all seniors become socialists eating up ever increasing amounts of the budget.

Socialists!! Socialists everywhere!!

God forbid people DON'T work until they die. At least... that's what YOU seem to espouse.

Do you agree with that?

  • 8 votes
#1.22 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:10 PM EST

Happy

Did you read the article, or just the headline? She already setup a trust, NO ONE can get at it unless their name is listed in the trust.

  • 11 votes
#1.23 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:12 PM EST

She probably just won back all the money she spent over the years buying lottery tickets. Good for her!

  • 9 votes
#1.24 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:18 PM EST

Two hundred and ten million, that's a LOT of tickets.

  • 9 votes
#1.25 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:19 PM EST

Congratulations, and God bless her! Wish her all the best!

  • 12 votes
#1.26 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:24 PM EST

She will make a great Cougar!!!

  • 7 votes
#1.27 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:33 PM EST

starbuck49

Rick

It's like an insurance policy for the aged. You pay premiums for your working life and then they pay you to have enough money in your non working years to live on. It is not a socialistic program.

It's very little much socialistic. It's calculated how long you statistically have to live to determine how little to pay back. Most people pay far more than what they get back in return. Most die w/in 10-15 yrs or less when SS starts. Where do you think that money goes if your spouse is still not alive....to the government.

  • 3 votes
#1.28 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:35 PM EST

having paid nearly $67,000,000 (67 million dollars) in taxes on a $3 purchase is certainly noteworthy in and of it's self.

she has already paid for many people's 'gifts' or 'benefits' from one program or another. state or federal.

and she has more than funded her own social security in her own real dollars, not from someone else's. so most of the negative people here can back off and give her some space: stop nipping at her heels!

to me, she seems like a lovely woman. and at 81 years she isn't some gadfly who is going to blow through her good fortune as others have done. and any mother who is out buying her son his favorite treat deserves good fortune. (all i ever got from my parents was indifference, negelect and condemnation.)

so congrats to you, dear woman. long life and good fortune you. now and always!

  • 25 votes
#1.29 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:35 PM EST

and then, and then, $52.5 million in federal taxes and then, and then, gone in the blink of an eye....

  • 7 votes
#1.30 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:40 PM EST

Some of the comments are incredible. Some worthy and some filled with that ugly demon jealousy. So...if you don't like the way the system is run, VOTE wisely...or most of you don't vote, right? Complacency is killing this country and the corrupt socialist government knows it. Since you are whining about how things are in our country. There have always been rich and there have always been poor...what part of that picture do you not understand folks. I work hard and can't afford freeloaders. Hopefully Texas will pass a bill where if you want food stamps, and welfare, you have to take a drug test. They are doing this in Florida. Anyway, this women is fortunate in deed to have won. God bless her and may He protect her and her family.

    #1.31 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:41 PM EST

    Good news and bad news for her. Now she is rich and she is one of the despised 1 percenters.

    • 7 votes
    #1.32 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:50 PM EST

    Where are all the people to tell her how stupid and mathematically challenged she is for playing powerball?

    What is the return on her investment?

    • 3 votes
    #1.33 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:53 PM EST

    These lotteries are just plain wrong in so many ways. This "power ball" junk is pathetic. How much better would this country would be if 336 people each won a million instead of one person winning it all? I don't play the stupid thing, but my God man, can't we make this thing better for everyone by splitting these winnings up among many many winners versus just one or two?

    • 5 votes
    #1.34 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:54 PM EST

    She probably just won back all the money she spent over the years buying lottery tickets. Good for her!

    You are awful at math. Seriously. The odds of her spending $150m on lottery tickets in her lifetime are 1 in a Centillion.

    • 6 votes
    #1.35 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:54 PM EST

    Good for her. I hope what life she has left she can spend in peace and comfort.

    • 7 votes
    #1.36 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:54 PM EST

    Hey all I can say, is happy days are here again. Louise you can now afford that little black hat you've liked for so long. I'm personally happy for her and I'm gald her family is set for life, about time we hear some good news for a change!!!

    Haters will always be haters. Must be a bitch living in downsville all the time. Good thing she wasn't some of you guy's grandmother, you'd probably snuffed her out and cashed the ticket.

    • 11 votes
    #1.37 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:56 PM EST

    She better get her a will that is etched in stone...

    She's a lucky old bird...Good for her!!

    • 4 votes
    #1.38 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:11 PM EST

    $336 million: Rhode Island woman, 81, wins Powerball

    Better late than never. Enjoy it in good health, darlin'!

    • 9 votes
    #1.39 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:15 PM EST

    Seems to me like you might be a bit jealous there JCB. Don't worry, your turn will come. NOT!

    • 3 votes
    #1.40 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:15 PM EST

    lotteries are the worst form of taxation. The people who can least afford it are the ones who spend the most money on it. Rich people don't buy lottery tickets. State sponsored gambling with the most horrific odds.

    • 5 votes
    #1.41 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:18 PM EST

    I am glad for her and her family. Congrats to all. Now the Gov't can get a loan from her @ 10% interest.

    • 3 votes
    #1.42 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:31 PM EST

    Lots of wealthy folks set up trusts because if it is a large sum of money and you die the government gets most of it unless you have one.. It would suck for her family if the government collected 90% of it in death tax so this is what smart people do.. Conspiracy theory quack quacks watching too much TV.. Yep the government pilfered the SS funds and now that they have to cough up money it becomes an entitlement.. Trillions down the crapper.. Do you realise that if they had left it alone we could have retired at 52 instead of 72 with 2x the monthly allowance.. This would have also included college educations for every child..

    Congrats to You and your family...................

    • 5 votes
    #1.43 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:35 PM EST

    For those of you who yelled because a few people had the "audacity" to wish that she would donate some of the money to others who recently, tragically, had suffered great losses.....there's nothing wrong with hoping that people who come into a magnitude of money will graciously give to those in need. That's what separates compassion with greed.

    • 5 votes
    #1.44 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:45 PM EST

    Rhino, I doubt anyone is being compelled to buy lottery tickets. You can't save everyone from themselves.

    • 1 vote
    #1.45 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:47 PM EST

    Somebody tell her I'll hit it from the front for a cool mil.

    • 1 vote
    #1.46 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:57 PM EST

    @stopandthink: I agree it is not the states job to save everyone from themselves. Can you agree that it is also not the states job to be the ones taking advantage of millions of peoples desparation and stupidity? Is this really what we are paying our elected officials to do? To figure out new and creative ways to rip off poor people in order to generate more cash flow to compensate for their inability to ballance a budget while continuing to garner favor by essentially bribing them with there own money?

    May I suggest that you stop and think about it.

    • 4 votes
    #1.47 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:06 PM EST

    @JCB

    Typical Obama supporter Leftist tripe...she won, fair and square so let her enjoy it.....you think as many people would play or the pots would get so large if

    How much better would this country would be if 336 people each won a million instead of one person winning it all?

    Hey you can't win if you don't play...but if you do and happen to win let's say $100 Million I hope that you will give away $99 Million to 99 worthy people and keep $1 Million for yourself then you would have your wish of everybody being equal...and get the special Obabma medal for promoting his 'everyone equal ideals'....either that or you could go to your local OWS protest and dole out more there since they believe the same thing you do...share the wealth man....share the wealth

    • 3 votes
    #1.48 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:14 PM EST

    hsw321 - au contraire. She actually is now one of the 1%, and will in turn now be hated by the 99%. Common misconception by those want. The rich don't care who else is rich, they just don't want people taking their money, or having it redistributed via the government.

    • 4 votes
    #1.49 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:14 PM EST

    In my opinion, they need to put a "cap" on lottery winnings, say $5M....no one needs $336M! I thought the whole idea of the lottery was to bring in money for our schools. After they pay out the cap; any money left over should go directly to the schools! I think most of us would be totally thrilled to have $5M and it would last us ALL for the rest of our lives (if managed wisely). I could live on the interest alone and make more than both my husband and I make in a year! Getting any more than the cap would be ridiculous....no one can spend that amount of money in a lifetime....or even in their immediate family's lifetimes! But, as said, this is just MY opinion and I'm sure a lot of people would disagree. I happen to think it would work. As a note, if I EVER won the lottery (and I don't play), my local schools would get a sizeable portion of it in my family's name. They really need it, and I think education is the most important thing in the United States right now and it's getting decimated by the states and Federal government!!!

    • 3 votes
    #1.50 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:18 PM EST

    Will you marry me?

    I am a HARD worker at any time day or night,on call so to speak.

    I can keep a smile on your face 24/7/365, I can even play the clown when you need a laugh.

    your feet will never be without someone to rub them baby doll.

    I am here for you baby,just a phone call away.

    P.S.

    Please send me airfare and some expense money to get me there.

    • 2 votes
    #1.51 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:22 PM EST

    lotteries are the worst form of taxation. The people who can least afford it are the ones who spend the most money on it. Rich people don't buy lottery tickets. State sponsored gambling with the most horrific odds.

    According to what evidence? All the studies I've seen suggest it's primarily the middle class who play it the most. There's also the instance of the hedge fund managers recently winning the powerball not too long ago, so there goes your notion about rich people not buying them.

    • 1 vote
    #1.52 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:28 PM EST

    Rich people don't buy lottery tickets.

    Then why have rich people won the lottery?

    • 2 votes
    #1.53 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:34 PM EST

    Good for her..be more if she lived/purchased in a state with no tax on a lottery win.Only eight states left with no state tax, but I bet that will stop soon.

    Arizona
    5% state withholding (Arizona residents), 6% state withholding (non-Arizona residents)

    Arkansas
    7% state withholding

    California
    No state tax on lottery prizes

    Colorado
    4% state withholding

    Connecticut
    6.7% state withholding

    Delaware
    No state tax on lottery prizes

    Georgia
    6% state withholding

    Idaho
    7.8% state withholding

    Illinois
    5% state withholding

    Indiana
    3.4% state withholding

    Iowa
    5% state withholding

    Kansas
    5% state withholding

    Kentucky
    6% state withholding

    Louisiana
    5% state withholding

    Maine
    5% state withholding

    Maryland
    9.25% state withholding (Maryland residents), 7.5% state withholding (non-Maryland residents)

    Massachusetts
    5% state withholding

    Michigan
    4.35% state withholding

    Minnesota
    7.25% state withholding

    Missouri
    4% state withholding

    Montana
    6.9% state withholding

    Nebraska
    5% state withholding

    New Hampshire
    No state tax on lottery prizes

    New Jersey
    10.8% state withholding

    New Mexico
    6% state withholding

    New York
    8.97% state withholding, plus: 3.648% (NYC residents), 0.897% (Yonkers residents)

    North Carolina
    7% state withholding

    North Dakota
    5.54% state withholding

    Ohio
    6% state withholding

    Oklahoma
    4% state withholding

    Oregon
    8% state withholding

    Pennsylvania
    No state tax on lottery prizes

    Rhode Island
    7% state withholding

    South Carolina
    7% state withholding

    South Dakota
    No state tax on lottery prizes

    Tennessee
    No state tax on lottery prizes

    Texas
    No state tax on lottery prizes

    U.S. Virgin Islands
    Unknown State Tax Rate

    Vermont
    6% state withholding

    Virginia
    4% state withholding

    Washington
    No state tax on lottery prizes

    Washington, D.C.
    8.5% state withholding

    West Virginia
    6.5% state withholding

    Wisconsin
    7.75% state withholding

    • 1 vote
    #1.54 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:56 PM EST

    Even if you brought the ticket in a state with no state tax for lottery win..If your state does tax a win you still have to pay state taxes on the win.

    One possible way around it is ( after talking to a lawyer) if ticket was purchased in a state with no tax on a win and you live in another state that taxes a win, just delay the claim and establish residency in the state where you purchased the ticket before the prize claim period expires.

    • 2 votes
    #1.55 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 4:02 PM EST

    Excellent post. Thanks. And congratulations to the lucky winner in Cranston, RI!

    • 2 votes
    #1.56 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 4:02 PM EST

    @Son-

    I think you just took the wind out of JCB it's not fair post.....LMAO....Yeah, I'm so sure he or she would do that, but they sure as hell could,,, funny, funny, funny.....

    • 1 vote
    #1.57 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 4:03 PM EST

    and yet this ONE payday for her results in her paying more Federal Taxes than Romney over the past 15 or so years.

    Capital Gains rates have GOT to go,...Tax it all!

    • 6 votes
    #1.58 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 4:27 PM EST

    I'm sure she's thrilled and all, but I would be a little peeved that I was 81 when I won. Kinda limits my travel and partying options. But on the brightside, she probably won't outlive it.

    Have a great time, you don't owe anybody anything. Give if it makes you feel good and happy inside. If you have to think about it, tell them to take a hike.

    • 2 votes
    #1.59 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 4:42 PM EST

    Mike757,

    "You are awful at math. Seriously. The odds of her spending $150m on lottery tickets in her lifetime are 1 in a Centillion."

    You're right, I am awful at math, but, anyway, I was just being facetious in my remark.

    • 1 vote
    #1.60 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 4:47 PM EST

    Good for her! Her remaining years and her families lives will be easier now.

    • 1 vote
    #1.61 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 6:46 PM EST

    @Marbles WTF is wrong with you?

    "...I would be a little peeved that I was 81 when I won...."

    You can't be serious, like it is a right to win not a privelege. Under no circumstance, does a person have the right to feel annoyed or resentful winning the lottery.

    • 1 vote
    #1.62 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 10:54 AM EST

    "JCB-1236504

    These lotteries are just plain wrong in so many ways. This "power ball" junk is pathetic. How much better would this country would be if 336 people each won a million instead of one person winning it all? I don't play the stupid thing, but my God man, can't we make this thing better for everyone by splitting these winnings up among many many winners versus just one or two?"

    It is would be better, but it's all about the money and the people buying the lottery. I have never played the lottery until the $336 million when my bf pursuaded me to buy a couple. Didn't win obviously, but there were half a dozen people in line buying at least $10 worth of Powerball tickets as well as half a dozen people in and out. The following drawing I only bought two tickets and it went down to $40 million. The store was dead. I spoke to the clerk and she said it gets crazy after $100-150 million.

    This is in FAQ at powerball.com under I have a game idea; you should give 100 people $1 million each:
    "If you believe that we should pay out $1 million prizes to lots of persons:
    After players told us that in focus groups, we actually started that game. No
    one played. Lotteries need to create a variety of games that appeal to different
    players. Powerball is a game that appeals to those players who want to play for
    large jackpots. There are other games that offer better odds (and so, lower
    jackpot amounts). Sales for a Powerball drawing can vary from $16 million to
    $200 million. You might guess which jackpot levels bring the most sales. Players
    vote with their dollars on the jackpot levels they prefer and we must listen to
    our customers. Powerball is actually two games in one – a big jackpot game and a
    big Cash 5 game. Now, a player will win $1 million just by matching the five
    white ball numbers. We know folks don't really get excited about that, but it is
    just something we want to do. By adding the Power Play option, a player can even
    increase the Cash 5 part of the game to a $2 million cash prize."

    • 1 vote
    #1.63 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:39 AM EST

    Rick and the rest of S.S. experts;

    Now a little history lesson. As originally implemented during the FDR admin, Social Security was a voluntary program not a tax. Those who paid into the system could late draw from it. Those did not, could not. You were given a social security number and told to reveal it to no one. The reason for this was, it was the your social security account number. Imagine that, a numbered, interest bearing, Insured account number in YOUR name. Sorta like the privatization effort put forward some years ago and roundly criticized by the left, oddly the same party as FDR who set the system up in precisely that way. All was well and the system carried a surplus year to year. Beginning with Eisenhower, the government began "borrowing" from the system to pay for thing like Eisenhower's Interstate system. Kennedy "borrowed" from it for various reasons. LBJ borrowed billions for his war on poverty.

    When they realized they had essentially bankrupted a once grand system that actually worked. they sought to rectify it by making it a tax that all paid. Your social security number became you "tax payer Identification number". But, since it was a tax, that means everyone was also able to draw from it. Add to that care of the infirm, and disabled was lumped onto it, opening up money formerly use for this purpose in the general fund, and also furthering the imbalance of revenue to pay out ratio.

    The rest is, as they say, history. A system set up a tax neutral, and perpetually solvent, by a Democrat who had more sense in such matters than any since, essential destroyed by the same party in the interest of making it an unsustainable pseudo-social program, just like every other social program they have conceived. Congratulations. These are the facts, look into it yourself. I know it's dry reading and the truth hurts, but it is, what it is.

    • 1 vote
    #1.64 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:55 AM EST

    Well that sounds good and all Nicodemus, but tell me something: how come it's always liberal Democrats that dig into the SS piggy bank for socialist spending programs? Oh one other thing: how come it's always liberal Democrats that hiss like a snake when the GOP tried to offer solutions to SS like partial privatization options?

      #1.65 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:40 AM EST

      he ansered that....... In short, this aint your mother's democratic party.

      • 1 vote
      #1.66 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:34 PM EST

      Anyone who would wait a month to claim it would be losing about 200 grand in interest for that month. Cmon this is like the 5th trust to win a lottery with a big jackpot that waited to claim it.

      Did it occur to you at any point that it might have taken some time for Ms. White and her lawyers to establish the trust? It's not something that can be done in a few days. Personally, I would be more concerned about someone who DID come forward right away to claim the money. If it was me, I would be talking to my lawyer and to a good financial adviser to get my ducks in a row before I claimed the money. Setting up a trust is an excellent way to make sure that your heirs don't have to pay inheritance tax on the money - you make them successor trustees and they have full access to the money once you're gone.

        #1.67 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:13 PM EST
        Reply

        Someone's grandkids are going to start being nicer to her.

        • 33 votes
        Reply#2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:32 AM EST

        I hope she remembers that I am a long lost favorite relative. :)

        • 14 votes
        #2.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:18 PM EST

        Good for her. I hope she's a Democrat.

        • 9 votes
        #2.2 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 2:02 AM EST

        Be very careful what you say about the woman I love!

        • 3 votes
        #2.3 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 12:22 PM EST

        81 years old! Living proof that someone out there has a sense of humour. :-)

        • 1 vote
        #2.4 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 7:14 AM EST

        Hey Siobhan, Who says 81 is old? I know eighty year olds with more energy and courage than teenagers. You're here BECAUSE of those "old people". Sounds to me like Louise is a hardworking mother who will do wonderful things for her family with this money. Sad thing to me is there are so many jealous, negative comments. Stop hating.

        • 8 votes
        #2.5 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:01 AM EST

        marinmom;

        Wow, Clearly one of the stupidest comments I've heard. What does her political party or lack thereof have to do with anything? You won't see a dime of the money regardless. She'll have all she can do fending off all the long lost 22nd cousins, fifty times removed that will coming out of the woodwork now. If your looking for a hand out, call your congressman. I'm sure your favorite liberal will be more than happy to write you a check, NOT!

        • 9 votes
        #2.6 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:08 AM EST

        Here's hoping to see Louise and her 'Sherebert or Sherbet Trust on the program "How the lottery changed my life". After seeing so many completely blow their winnings, I'm sure she'll make wise decisions that will make everyone happy. She looks like a wise lady that has great plans for her family. Stayed tuned.

        • 2 votes
        #2.7 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:38 AM EST

        RC-1244080; Your comment has started my husband and my day off, with a wonderful belly laugh!!

          #2.8 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:50 AM EST

          If I won I'd live in squalor, panhandling. Pretending I was dirt poor. Then when someone got into an argument with me on a corner and said something like, 'why don't you get a job, you bum?!" I could say, 'I DON'T NEED A JOB'

          and they'd be like, 'You're the reason people like me have to pay so much in taxes!"

          and I'd say, 'Like You! I've paid more taxes than you!'

          and they'd say, 'oh really? Why don't you just shut up, you stupid homeless guy!"

          and I'd say, 'I'll have your job!'

          and then they'd say, 'what do you mean by that?'

          and I'd say, 'I'll have you fired and then you'll be here on the corner, just like me. So you'd better be nice!"

          and they'd say, 'yeah, right. Whatever.'

          And then the next day I'd go to their boss and offer them something outrageous to buy the company the schmuck works for. He'd sell and then announce there's been a management shift. I'd be announced as the new owner. Or course that guy would see me in my bum clothes and be pretty nervous, shifting on his feet. He might even consider sucking up to me. So I'd say to my new employees.

          'Please, pay no attention to my raggedy clothes. I was just panhandling. And don't worry, things will mostly stay the same around here, but I have some business to attend to first.'

          I'd then walk over to the guy who smart mouthed me the day before. I'd walk really slowly. He'd be sweating bullets. And then I'd say,

          YOU! YOU'RE FIRED! NOW GET OUT! GET OUT ON THE STREET, HOTSHOT! IT'S YOUR TURN!

          I'd then order a sherbeRt and enjoy my new position as boss of the guy's crappy company.

          THAT'S what I'd do. But see, I'm not like other lottery winners. I have vision.

          • 2 votes
          #2.9 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:32 PM EST

          lol

          • 1 vote
          #2.10 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:37 PM EST
          Reply

          Rhode Island woman, 81, wins Powerball

          It figures.

          SI

          • 11 votes
          Reply#3 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:32 AM EST

          Just FYI...Ms. White has a very nice family. I went to high school with her granddaughter, and her son has been actively involved in the community for years and years. They do lots of good things in Newport. I've spoken with several others who know the White family, and everyone is (to the person) really happy for them. I'm sure Ms. White will make wise decisions with her money, one of the benefits of being 81 years old. Good for her and her family!

          • 33 votes
          #3.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:40 PM EST

          Yeah, good for her but it is kind of funny how it always seems to be a senior citizen who wins these big lottos! Keep buying the tickets...

          • 4 votes
          #3.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 5:07 PM EST

          Maybe because they have proven through a liftime of good work they can HANDLE it? I AGREE 100% with Baboosmom. Good for you Ms. Louise. Live and be well. Enjoy the money and forget the haters.

          • 5 votes
          #3.3 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:04 AM EST

          At her age she will need very little of it personally and has had nearly a life time to witness who does. Hopefully she will be able to do great things in her community.

          • 2 votes
          #3.4 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:17 AM EST

          cdbdvm- very well put! I'd venture to say, she's been a hard working lady who has always given to her family...

            #3.5 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:45 AM EST

            cdbdvm ~ I hope she hangs on to a lot for herself. As the caretaker for two nearly 90 year-old parents, I can tell you that she may need more than "very little." I pray her children will take care of her and provide the best care possible for her. Sounds like she deserves it!!!

              #3.6 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:03 PM EST

              I hope she leaves all the money to her generous cat. I then hope the cat revitalizes the dwindling entertainment district in Rhode Island, bringing a renaissance of art and talent to the area. And, in a twist of fate someone suggests they revive the musical 'Cats!' and then the cat goes mad, remembering the time she tried out for the Broadway spectacular and was told, 'don't call us, we'll call you.

              At that point the cat pumps money into the local mafia scene and, with influence and contacts, becomes head of a prominent crime family, intent on destroying the state, illegally pumping toxic sewage into the streets.

              And this spurns an outcry of 'WHY?!!!!' from the citizens, which turns the cats' heart, who then disassociates herself with the mob (having to rub out a few characters to fully break free) and starting a new, humble, wiser life we can all learn from.

                #3.7 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:51 PM EST
                Reply

                Ummm, little factual error, its called SHERBET not SHERBERT! NO R.. WTF.. morons

                Congrats. Lets hope she doesn't give to the religious and her kids are smart with the money.

                • 15 votes
                Reply#4 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:34 AM EST

                Why shouldn't she give to her church and why WOULDN'T her kids/grand kids be smart with the money?

                • 21 votes
                #4.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:40 PM EST

                She shouldn't give to the church because religion sucks enough money away from other, better causes. Her kids might not be smart with the money because they could be suckered into giving their money to THE CHURCH!

                • 6 votes
                #4.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 4:07 PM EST

                Her choice, just hope she doesn't give more to local, state and federal governments than what is legally required. That would be just like going out back and burning it.

                • 2 votes
                #4.3 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 6:54 PM EST

                What a sad lot of people above who bash religion, and the majority of our population who are church goers. Sour minded people of this ilk only wish to insult for insulting's sake and throw dispersions on people they don't even know. What is sadder is that they are living a life without hope of having a soul after their death.

                Aside from being, it's actually pretty disguting to use an article about a nice lady winning some lottery money to push their agenda. Pitiful, and what is wrong with out country today.

                • 11 votes
                #4.4 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:25 PM EST

                Jimee, your clearly just trying to offend people. God or not, you still look like a dumbass.

                • 9 votes
                #4.5 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:44 PM EST

                Hey, 420 Frees the Mind. I get your tag. So don't be a pompous ass, especially when you're wrong. I had a feeling you were, so I checked the dictionary. "Sherbet" refers to "a cold drink of sweetened and diluted fruit juice," with Persian and Turkish origins; "sherbert" refers to "an ice with milk, egg white or gelatin added," which is what we buy in the market. Try not to fit into the mold I see so often on posts like this, of people without integrity or minimal politeness. (I have showed you a minimal politeness, and I had the integrity to confirm my suspicions.) Represent.

                Just stopped by and felt moved to say this for the benefit of readers who might have wondered.

                • 4 votes
                #4.6 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 4:27 AM EST

                I appreciate those who give to their church/religion....but those who are okay with giving 10% or more to their church and then file bankruptcy because they can't pay their doctor, electricity, CELL PHONE, INTERNET...is mind-boggling. Does "God" think it is okay to pay to the church yet neglect the services they WANT and abuse??? Sorry....this is a VERY common thing I encounter in my career...those who donate to their religion yet throw their creditors under the bus to eat the costs they discharge in their bankruptcies...Is this acceptable?? Really?

                • 4 votes
                #4.7 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:13 AM EST

                I would say at 81, she's old enough to decide what to do with HER money. If she gives it to the ASPCA would you bitch about that? Even given the fact that 88% of the animals they "rescue" are euthanized? I hope she builds a couple of new churches, just so some of you born again atheists blow a freaking gasket and die.

                • 2 votes
                #4.8 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:11 AM EST

                Hey Richard, 420 Freesthemind is correct - it is SHERBET not SHERBERT. This has been a pet peeve of mine my whole life and I know I am correct. I don't know which dictionary you looked in but mine and the internet say it is SHERBET.

                • 1 vote
                #4.9 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:55 AM EST

                Congratulations to her for her good fortune.

                • 3 votes
                #4.10 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:33 AM EST

                I'm glad I didn't win it. I'd only have a lifetime to spend and enjoy it, whereas this lady has only a couple of years.

                Also, everyone has a great idea in that she should give the money to charity and other helpful organizations. Because they continue to solve all the world's problems and all. When I think of a problem bothering people today I think, 'Government, Churches, Charity' and I know the problem is solved.

                I'm sure they will run a documentary on her winning on PBS, commercial free, because there's no corporate sponsorship or commercials on PBS. That's the great thing about public service, and charity. Very self-sustaining and problem solving. Yeah, we should all just sign over our paychecks to someone smarter like that and be good people.

                • 1 vote
                #4.11 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:08 PM EST
                Reply

                "Vivacious octogenarian?" Rush will be happy to know that she can pay for her own birth control...

                • 28 votes
                Reply#5 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:34 AM EST

                At 81, birth control is probably the least of her health care worries, no?

                • 12 votes
                #5.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:00 PM EST

                My grandmother had uterine cancer, sometime in her 60's. Rush would have refused her treatments as they dealt with the reproductive system, just same as he would for a 20 year old woman with ovarian cysts, and called her names while doing so.

                • 5 votes
                #5.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:23 PM EST

                And the totally irrelevant political B.S. just keeps coming from the idiots of the world. Why don't you just keep making these moronic statements so the rest of the world see's how stupid you truly are?

                • 2 votes
                #5.3 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:15 AM EST

                No one is trying to deny any one of medical help. The left if trying to get the younger women angry at the right, and they are doing a really good job. Women please do not allow them to use you for their agenda. Right now they have brought a 31 year old attorney, who by the way is in practice in California, to lie to the American people about her needs. Just why should we pay for her bedroom recreation. This pill cost $9.00 a month and can be gotten from any Planned Parent office free. Youth of America please do not allow them to use you. It is your tomorrows that this whole situation is truly destroying. Please bring back decent respect, morality and virtue. Allowing every Tom, Dick and Harry into your bedroom is not respecting one's self.

                I am so happy this lady, at 81, will have finicial freedom at the sunset of her life. God Bless her and her family.

                a

                • 2 votes
                #5.4 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:39 AM EST

                Any of you libys watch the view? Oreily was on it telling those polite ladies about title X(10), ever heard of it?

                htt p: // latimesblogs . latimes . com/showtracker/201 2/03/ bill-oreilly-the-view . html

                First few minutes.

                • 1 vote
                #5.5 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:54 PM EST
                Reply

                Ass kissing time!

                • 10 votes
                Reply#6 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:38 AM EST

                She better spend that money fast and furious.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#7 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:39 AM EST

                yay for her i say! Why can't everyone just be happy for her!

                • 4 votes
                #7.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:07 PM EST

                @ Kim

                I honestly am happy for her, but to be fully honest, I'd be happier for me if I won it. I'm selfish that way.

                But really, doesn't that kind of balance things out? I'm happy for her right now but I don't think she's happy for me at all. I'm not the one who won so you'd think she could spread some of the happiness around. But does she even think about me? Not a wit! True, we've never met, but still...

                  #7.2 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:05 PM EST
                  Reply

                  I would go with the lump sum.

                  • 7 votes
                  Reply#8 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:40 AM EST

                  I think we're all better people for knowing that. Thank you.

                  • 6 votes
                  #8.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:57 AM EST

                  I agree with TL, I was kinda worried just what the hell you might do with a win like that. I thank you 2..

                  dano

                  • 1 vote
                  #8.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 4:09 PM EST
                  Reply

                  She better take the payments over the 29 years!

                  • 6 votes
                  Reply#9 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:41 AM EST

                  It probably dont matterhow she takes the $ , poor thing will probably kill over due to the stress from bumming by her family and freinds

                  • 3 votes
                  #9.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:44 PM EST

                  Bobby, I used to think the same thing, but as it turns out, she'll pay fewer taxes taking the lump sum.

                    #9.2 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:05 AM EST
                    Reply

                    God bless her.

                    • 16 votes
                    Reply#10 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:41 AM EST

                    Is she single?

                    • 23 votes
                    Reply#11 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:44 AM EST

                    lmao

                    • 2 votes
                    #11.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:41 PM EST

                    Thats just gross...but funny...LOL

                    • 3 votes
                    #11.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:16 PM EST
                    Reply

                    No more BINGO for Grandma!

                    • 5 votes
                    Reply#12 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:49 AM EST

                    You kidding me? If I was 81 and won the lottery, I'd be hitting the casino like there was no tomorrow. Because (let's be honest), at that age, there might not be.

                    • 7 votes
                    #12.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:51 AM EST

                    I think that she needs to hire Romney's tax accountant. She definitely is paying more than 15%

                    • 11 votes
                    #12.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:46 PM EST

                    Stan, you mean the money that he was already taxed by working on for earning at probably a rate in the upper twenties that he turned around and used to invest that he is now being taxed again an additional 15%? Get out of your parents basement and seek treatment before you spout off ignorant comments not facts.

                    • 6 votes
                    #12.3 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:38 PM EST

                    Hejustdoesntgetit - you might want to do a little research yourself, before spouting off ignorant comments. I beleive there's a loophole for people in Romney's "job" that allows their income earned for advising/investing on behalf of their clients to be taxed at the same capital-gains rates, not the standard earned-income rates, so it's doubtful that he ever paid a rate close to what average Americans pay on any money he's ever earned.

                    As far as the lottery winner - How fabulous for her! I hope she does whatever makes her happiest from this moment forward!

                    • 5 votes
                    #12.4 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 8:07 PM EST

                    "You kidding me? If I was 81 and won the lottery, I'd be hitting the casino like there was no tomorrow."

                    Why? Shes already as lucky as shes gona get when it comes to winning money.

                      #12.5 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:47 PM EST

                      Lottery winners can and should be announced without plastering their full name, city, state and photos everywhere. My prayers are with her and I hope the dust settles soon so she can enjoy her winnings however she chooses.

                      • 4 votes
                      #12.6 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 4:32 AM EST

                      @ themost

                      lottery winners should be locked in cages and paraded through the streets for one week with free tomatos and lettuce handed out to people lined up to see the spectacle. People should be encouraged to throw said vegetables at the winner and get out all their jealousy against the rich and fortunate. They should do this for anyone with over 10 million in their bank accounts once a year. THEN and only then could our country fully heal, for as we all know, 9-11 changed everything.

                        #12.7 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:59 PM EST
                        Reply

                        Will you marry me?

                        • 8 votes
                        Reply#13 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:52 AM EST

                        She can use the money to learn to spell "sherbet."

                        Or do the writers and editors of the story need a refresher course?

                        • 5 votes
                        Reply#14 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:54 AM EST

                        As of now, she can spell sherbet any way she wants.

                        • 28 votes
                        #14.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 11:59 AM EST

                        Blame it on the reporter who wrote the story... or the copywriter..

                        • 12 votes
                        #14.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:23 PM EST

                        Actually, the dictionary uses both Sherbet AND Sherbert when describing the frozen concoction so to those of you dissing the writers/editors for their 'glaring' error...you might want to educate yourselves first.

                        • 22 votes
                        #14.3 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:37 PM EST

                        Growing up, everyone who said it, said "sherbert". Sher-bert. Aware of the alternate spelling, maybe it's a regional thing.

                        • 3 votes
                        #14.4 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:42 PM EST

                        Sounds OK to me... Sherbert is American and several hundred years old.. Sherbet is Islamic from the Ottoman vocabulary and age unknown.. So we will stick to American if you thread nazis don't mind..

                        pop-soda-soft drink kinda thing

                        • 1 vote
                        #14.5 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:50 PM EST

                        i call it... push-up...

                        • 2 votes
                        #14.6 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:18 PM EST

                        Roadrunnero...how about everyone call it what she actually named the trust fund...The Rainbow Sherbet Fund. Word origins are not relevant...the facts are.

                        • 2 votes
                        #14.7 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 7:03 PM EST

                        Dude she didn't write the story! Could be the writers mistake

                        • 1 vote
                        #14.8 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:24 AM EST

                        Mark-865096... "White came forward Tuesday morning and accepted the money on behalf of the Rainbow Sherbert Trust." The Rainbow Sherbert Trust, not The Rainbow Sherbet Fund. Before you advise someone the facts are what's relevant, I hope you at least take the time to notice them.

                        • 1 vote
                        #14.9 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:02 AM EST

                        @ Cassandra, sorry it took you this long to realize you grew up around a pack of idiots.

                        As for 'Sherbert', yes, it is Sherbet but enough ignorance over time has allowed 'Sherbert' into the dictionary. I only fear Nucyular wars creeping into Webster's, but that's a whole other game.

                        And as someone else pointed out, she's rich. She can spell it 'Sh$tbert' and the waiter would still be nice to her... the most eligible bachelorette in all of Rhode Island!

                        PS: I'm moving to Rhode Island pronto. If I see any of you at her door when I get there I will be shooting first, asking questions later.

                          #14.10 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:18 PM EST
                          Reply
                          Comment author avatarMike-2522242Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          When asked by local media what she was going to do with her new wealth, Ms. White replied " I am so excited, now I can buy the extra large containers of wrinkle cream and Preparation H, and still have money left over at the end of the month. Heck, I might even get me a new set of teeth"!

                          • 4 votes
                          Reply#15 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:00 PM EST

                          and a better wig!

                          • 4 votes
                          #15.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:27 PM EST

                          Probably a ......................................FLEET of Wigs.

                            #15.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:01 PM EST

                            Private beautician and her own salon room for her and her gal friends I would think.. Throw in a spa and a pool with a few cabana boys.. Heck why not a trip to Disney Orlando for the family and then a few months in Hawaii during the cold months every year..

                              #15.3 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:57 PM EST

                              ...and a boytoy !!!

                                #15.4 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:13 AM EST
                                Reply

                                Good for her but here is something that would make a lot more sense.

                                Why don't you configure the lottery so that 336 people could win 1 million dollars each instead of 1 person winning 336 million. That way, 336 families would benefit instead of just 1 person winning such an obscene amount of money.

                                • 14 votes
                                #16 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:10 PM EST

                                And then the Socialist chimed in with a plan to redistribute her wealth. Why don't you just demand that she pay more taxes so you can get your "fair share".

                                • 17 votes
                                #16.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:17 PM EST

                                Uh because it is a "lottery" and therefore not "configured"..?

                                • 12 votes
                                #16.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:20 PM EST

                                336 people could win, if 336 tickets were sold with the winning numbers. That's how it works.

                                • 12 votes
                                #16.3 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:28 PM EST

                                Jim Johnson- If it was you that won it, I'm sure you wouldn't feel the same.

                                I highly doubt you would split it 336 ways even if you had that many family members.

                                Nice try though!

                                • 9 votes
                                #16.4 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:31 PM EST

                                i think Jim has a good point. i for a long time have wondered why they don't have more winners with smaller jackpots. the more of us out there spending all that excess cash the better right? and investing it? wouldn't it be a huge economy stimulator if there were many people with a million dollars spending money than one person having more than they could spend? you win the lottery say 100 million...you're gonna buy a house or 2, a car or 2 and then what? if 100 people won 1 million...they're all gonna buy a house and a car or 2. it does make sense. the only problem i can see is money won't be worth as much when so many people have it. they don't want that now do they? we're the ones putting all this value on money. as soon as we stop that the rich will become just like everybody else.

                                • 6 votes
                                #16.5 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:35 PM EST

                                Always nice when a workplace has a pool, and they hit it. Love the stories.

                                • 2 votes
                                #16.6 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:45 PM EST

                                They don't do that for the same reason they just started charging $2 for a ticket and tweaked it for bigger jackpots. Despite the illogic, the larger the jackpot, the more people will play and the more money gets collected. Remember, the government gets a significant share of the money. Despite the exact same chances of winning, people are somewhow more willing to buy a ticket if the payoff is larger.

                                • 9 votes
                                #16.7 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:54 PM EST

                                It timed out before I could add my other point. Where do you think all those lottery millions come from? All that money comes out of the economy, two bucks at a time. While it's an interesting idea to spread the winners around to "help the economy," I think we should remember those lottery dollars came out of the economy in the first place. The lottery isn't there to help anyone except to help the states generate additional revenue through a voluntary tax.

                                • 2 votes
                                #16.8 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:02 PM EST

                                Except that $1 million is not really that much money anymore. Though I would like to have $1 million too.

                                • 4 votes
                                #16.9 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:10 PM EST

                                @Jim Johnson

                                Typical Obama supporter Leftist tripe...she won, fair and square so let her enjoy it.....you think as many people would play or the pots would get so large if

                                Why don't you configure the lottery so that 336 people could win 1 million dollars each instead of 1 person winning 336 million.

                                Hey you can't win if you don't play...but if you do and happen to win let's say $100 Million I hope that you will give away $99 Million to 99 worthy people and keep $1 Million for yourself then you would have your wish of everybody being equal...and get the special Obabma medal for promoting his 'everyone equal ideals'....either that or you could go to your local OWS protest and dole out more there since they believe the same thing you do...share the wealth man....share the wealth

                                • 5 votes
                                #16.10 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:48 PM EST

                                They do spread the winners around. Don't you people have the slightest clue how a lottery works? The winning amount is divided by the number of tickets that have those numbers. You do understand that the system does allow for duplicate tickets, right? And that the actual numbers are chosen with a random drawing? When there are no winning tickets the pot grows (and may make this level eventually depending on how long that continues). There are payouts for tickets that have only some of the jackpot numbers as well (that are also divided by the number of tickets that have achieved that level of match). How on earth do you propose to 'spread the winnings around' any other way? It isn't like you can have a ticket with different numbers and become a winner. You only hear about it when it is a huge jackpot, but it starts out at 3 or 4 million.

                                  #16.11 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 3:54 PM EST

                                  Dave...the odds increased when they upped the ticket price. You used to pick the powerball number from 1-39. Now the options are 1-35. That raises the odds of winning to 1 in 175 million from 1 in 192 million.

                                  So the "chances of winning" are not exactly the same. Sorry to throw facts in the middle of your rant...

                                    #16.12 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 6:56 PM EST

                                    @ Son-Of-Anubis

                                    "Typical Obama supporter Leftist tripe...she won, fair and square so let her enjoy it....."

                                    woah woah! WOAH! Slow down there. Jim never suggested taking a single dollar from anybody, you do realize that right? I mean, you DO realize Jim was most likely using her situation as an example? Jim is referring to BEFORE ANYBODY WINS ANY MONEY. I put it in caps so you could understand the important part. So obviously, no money is taken from anyone. Now let's THINK for a second. As I said, Jim was using an example. It doesnt have to be as low as 1 MILL per winner im sure it would be worthwhile at like 5, 10, 20 MILL but 336 MILL? You do realize dreams can come true on a lot less than 336 MILLION right? You're so quick to fall into fear. Intelligence can help that... or a rational train of thought. And no I'm not saying I'm for or against Obama but you sir, seem to be a dumbass either way.

                                      #16.13 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 12:03 AM EST

                                      Powerball.com in FAQ under - I HAVE A GAME IDEA; YOU SHOULD GIVE 100 PEOPLE $1 MILLION EACH.

                                      "If you believe that we should pay out $1 million prizes to lots of persons:
                                      After players told us that in focus groups, we actually started that game. No
                                      one played. Lotteries need to create a variety of games that appeal to different
                                      players. Powerball is a game that appeals to those players who want to play for
                                      large jackpots. There are other games that offer better odds (and so, lower
                                      jackpot amounts). Sales for a Powerball drawing can vary from $16 million to
                                      $200 million. You might guess which jackpot levels bring the most sales. Players
                                      vote with their dollars on the jackpot levels they prefer and we must listen to
                                      our customers. Powerball is actually two games in one – a big jackpot game and a
                                      big Cash 5 game. Now, a player will win $1 million just by matching the five
                                      white ball numbers. We know folks don't really get excited about that, but it is
                                      just something we want to do. By adding the Power Play option, a player can even
                                      increase the Cash 5 part of the game to a $2 million cash prize."

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #16.14 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 3:51 AM EST

                                      Jim;

                                      Please tell us you aren't actually that stupid.

                                      it's GAMBLING! You pays your money and you takes your chances. SHE won, not Her and 335 other people. If you want a taste of the jackpot, but a freaking ticket, moron.

                                        #16.15 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:21 AM EST

                                        Jim, I think what you meant was, 'Why don't they configure a game where everyone pays to participate, I win an outrageous fortune I can squander and then they do it all again so I don't run out of money. But somehow, maybe they could configure it so I wouldn't feel bad about having so much and everyone having nothing, so maybe give them a million dollars or some odd figure like that."

                                        You lack the eloquence Miss White has in spades. She's quite vivacious her lawyers tell me. You will never be a Miss White- you could never pull it off.

                                          #16.16 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:24 PM EST
                                          Reply

                                          Good for her. I hope she can use it to pay medical bills, if she has any, and help her family! What a blessing!

                                          • 2 votes
                                          Reply#17 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:12 PM EST

                                          Huh? pay her medical bills..??

                                          I'm just curious why you made that statement, maybe she's healthier than you and I. She WAS drawing S.S. which she worked for and that would include MediCARE.

                                          This is a blessing for her though.

                                          • 2 votes
                                          #17.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:52 PM EST
                                          Reply

                                          I wish she was my grandma!

                                          • 7 votes
                                          Reply#18 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:13 PM EST

                                          I wish she my anybody right now.

                                          • 3 votes
                                          #18.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:45 PM EST
                                          Reply

                                          Just think of all those relatives that have pissed her off over the years...............they must be kicking themselves right now..............YOU GO GIRL!

                                          • 8 votes
                                          Reply#19 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:13 PM EST

                                          I cannot believe neither the winner nor the editor of this story can spell "sherbet" correctly!

                                            Reply#20 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:20 PM EST

                                            Scroll up and read about your "sherbert" comment and what makes you think this lady WROTE the article and sat there and said "spell it like this, spell it like that"

                                            DOH!

                                            • 5 votes
                                            #20.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:43 PM EST

                                            As mentioned above "She can spell it anyway she wants to"!!!

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #20.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:56 PM EST

                                            If you look at pretty much any dictionary, "sherbert" is a perfectly acceptable alternative spelling. In many cases, it's a regional thing. I grew up in RI and my recollection is that "sherbert" was always the preferred spelling.

                                              #20.3 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:41 PM EST
                                              Reply

                                              Congrats to this neat lady!

                                              • 3 votes
                                              Reply#21 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:22 PM EST

                                              Good for you granny :D She can spend her remaining years in comfort and luxury, I wish her well :D

                                              • 9 votes
                                              Reply#22 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:25 PM EST

                                              She sounds like a lovely woman. I hope she and her family will sit down with financial advisors. With that much money her entire family should be set for several generations if they plan and invest wisely.

                                              • 6 votes
                                              Reply#23 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:26 PM EST
                                              Reply
                                              Comment author avatarMike-2522242Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                              Media sources disclosed that Ms. White recently posted a personal ad in Ebony Magazine; WANTED - Male personal assistant. Must be at least twenty one years old, handsome, good natured, adventuresome, able to bench press 350 lbs., run a mile in seven minutes or less, likes his chocolate dark and sweet, and is willing and able to worship an Afro-American queen. Those having an aversion to less than perky breasts need not apply.

                                              • 3 votes
                                              Reply#24 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:26 PM EST

                                              Ebony magazine....AFRO-American queen.

                                              ok wow!

                                              • 3 votes
                                              #24.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:44 PM EST

                                              U do know such terminology spelled that way is in use to day.

                                                #24.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:03 PM EST

                                                Well, honestly I didn't know people still call people "Afro-Americans"

                                                • 1 vote
                                                #24.3 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:40 PM EST

                                                I saw it - Enlighten yourself and get off your high horse. There is both Ebony Magazine and the Afro American newspaper that serves the community with those interests. There was nothing racist in the context of my comments and the Wanted Ad was to add a bit of humor to the situation.

                                                Are you really that thinned skinned?

                                                  #24.4 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 10:16 AM EST
                                                  Reply

                                                  White chose to accept the lump sum payment of $210 million, rather than the 30 payments paid out over 29 years.

                                                  She should've taken the 30 payments over 29 years option.

                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  Reply#25 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:27 PM EST

                                                  But wouldn't that be ridiculous, she's 81 years old.

                                                  I wonder about these lottery laws, if she had taken that option, would the rest of the money go to her family when she passed away?

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #25.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:45 PM EST

                                                  Well good for her as she looks great for her age but with the 29 year option she'll be 110 yrs. old by the time she's paid off. Taking the lump sum was a wise thing to do and enjoy it while she is still able to.

                                                  Enjoy your winnings and live well.

                                                  • 4 votes
                                                  #25.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:51 PM EST

                                                  I was kidding.

                                                  • 4 votes
                                                  #25.3 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 12:58 PM EST

                                                  I was going to log on and say the exact same thing Adam. Glad I didn't... people are too dumb to get it.

                                                  • 4 votes
                                                  #25.4 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:31 PM EST

                                                  You can invest the $210 Million and live off the dividends without touching the $210M ever again. She should easily get 10% dividends on her investments ($21 Million/Yr). Good thing she put this in a trust.

                                                  A few years back a big winner spent all the money on a home and then had to sell the very next year from not having any money to pay the property tax. No sense for business or money.

                                                  This Lady has a plan. Great to hear good news for a change.

                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  #25.5 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:34 PM EST

                                                  At 81, most of it will go to the family, would have had a greater income by taking the annual installments. When she dies, the remainder goes to whom she chooses in her will. Would have been less taxes up front and in the long run. You win 336M but lucky to take half of that home cause the lottery is counting on you not to win. They earn the interest on the money that hasn't been won and when it is won, they prefer that a person take it in lump sum. When it first started, you had to take yearly payments, there was no lump sum. Finally someone sued a state lottery and the judge said it was the guy's money, pay the guy. After it was all said and done, he would have come out better by taking the payments.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #25.6 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:40 PM EST

                                                  At 81, most of it will go to the family

                                                  Suddenly the family has an opinion on the inheritance tax.

                                                  • 2 votes
                                                  #25.7 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 1:43 PM EST

                                                  Oh okay, Adam...Hell I thought you knew something we didn't. LOL!

                                                    #25.8 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:14 PM EST

                                                    Lots of self-described financial specialists and estate attorneys here, I see. If I read the article correctly, she claimed the winnings on behalf of the trust, so legally the money is not her's, it belongs to the trust. When she dies, the money does not go to anyone in her will, it is retained by the trust. She could designate a familiy member to manage the trust, but the money still must follow certain rules. If I understand trusts (and I'm not an attorney), there is no estate tax and no probate because the trust is a legal entity, almost like a corporation. The trust must use the money in whatever way she determined when it was created, no matter if she is alive or not.

                                                    • 5 votes
                                                    #25.9 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:21 PM EST

                                                    So since you're not a estate attorney, you're a self-described financial specialist?

                                                    Not being funny, but thank you for explaining what she did, it's interesting and I'll make sure I do the same when I win.

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #25.10 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:42 PM EST
                                                    MurphyElbaDeleted

                                                    @ Cassandra (again)

                                                    I HATE it when a pool of players win at work. I want to stab them in the eye with a fork, or put them on a deserted island to fight it out and see who is the 'winner'. When they share the ticket everyone gets some small sum and that's just not exciting. Makes a big prize seem pointless. As though they converted the prize into a care bear equivalent.

                                                    How would you feel if you played this game every week, finally won 500 million dollars and the lottery commission announced:

                                                    'Instead of cash we'll be giving out care bears to everyone who has ever played this game, as a big, caring 'thank you' for all the years of support'.

                                                    I'd be ready to strangle someone.

                                                    But that's just me.

                                                      #25.12 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:40 PM EST
                                                      Reply
                                                      Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 12
                                                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.