Election, economy spark explosive growth of militias

Hutaree.com via AP file

Screen shot from a training video used by the Christian militia group Hutaree in March 2010. The group was allegedly preparing for a battle with the Antichrist, whom they believed would be supported by local, state and federal officials. Nine were arrested and charged with conspiring to kill police officers, then kill scores more by attacking a funeral using homemade bombs.

The election of President Barack Obama in 2008 triggered an explosion in the number of militias and so-called patriot groups in the United States, the Southern Poverty Law Center reported in its annual tally of such anti-government organizations.

There were 149 militias and patriot groups when Obama took office, compared to more than 1,200 today — an increase of 755 percent, the nonprofit civil rights organization reported.


"The increase has just been astounding," said Mark Potok, editor-in-chief of the SPLC report. "The reality is that many of these groups are becoming more and more fearful that Barack Obama will win the re-election. You can see the anger rising along with that fear."

The SPLC defines the "patriot" movement as made up of conspiracy-minded individuals who see the federal government as their primary enemy. The movement includes paramilitary militias as well as groups of "sovereign citizens," who believe they are not subject to federal or state laws, nor obligated to pay federal taxes, according to SPLC.

The center also reports a steady rise in the number of hate groups in America — from 604 in 2000, to more than 1,000 last year. Those include anti-gay groups, anti-Muslim groups, black separatists and "Christian Identity" groups, which hold racist and anti-Semitic views that overlap with neo-Nazi beliefs.

The spike in these groups can be attributed to a combination of factors, including the sluggish economy, radical propaganda and anxiety over the election of a black president, Potok said.

Potok said although many individuals involved in patriot militias are not criminals, a handful of these groups have been responsible for a significant amount of violence in recent years.

Government employees targeted
SPLC provides one of the few annual reports on militia or anti-government groups. The Federal Bureau of Investigation does not track militia groups unless they are alerted to violent or extremist activity, according to an agency spokesman.

"Some of these groups veer into violent extremism," said Frank Harrill, special agent in charge of the FBI’s office in Spokane, Wash., and spokesman for the Inland Northwest Joint Terrorism Task Force. "Where hate and ignorance and violence collide, that is where our interests lie."

Two militia groups have made headlines in recent years for allegedly hatching violent plots to target government employees.

Seven people from the Michigan-based Hutaree Christian militia are on trial for allegedly conspiring to ambush and kill a police officer. They allegedly plotted to follow up the ambush with an attack on the officer’s funeral procession in the hope of killing more officers, and thus sparking a revolt against the U.S. government. Recent evidence presented in trial included a recording made by an undercover FBI agent in which the militia’s leader, David Stone, 47, says he is going to "start huntin'" police soon. The seven have pleaded innocent, and argue that the "plot" was nothing but talk, protected by the First Amendment.

And in November four members of a Georgia-based militia, all in their 60s and 70s, were charged with plotting to buy explosives and the ingredients to make a deadly toxin to attack government officials. They are in custody awaiting trial.

But members of other militias say that exercising their constitutional right to bear arms does not mean they are committed to revolution.

Spokane-based militia member Ed LeStage, 59, denied that his group, the 63rd Battalion of Lightfoot Militia, which was listed on as an active militia group in the SPLC’s report, was a danger — unless, he said, "you're a communist or socialist who attacks us."

LeStage, a veteran to the patriot movement, said he believes the increased number of militias comes from U.S. citizens’ desire to restore the country to its constitutional roots. He also said that what he called President Obama’s intrusion on personal liberties also has driven growth in the movement.

"He’s been after our guns," LeStage said. "Obama’s been the best gun salesman there ever was."

From his home in eastern Washington, LeStage broadcasts weekly training videos to militia members across the country. Those videos — which include instruction on such things as drinking one’s own urine and scavenging for food — are meant to help members survive anarchy or economic collapse.

LeStage said he has been involved in militias and related groups for more than 20 years, including the Idaho Mountain Boys, a member of which was arrested in September 2002 for plotting to kill a federal judge and a police officer.

That member, Larry Raugust, served 77 months for possession and production of pipe bombs. Today, Raugust has a member profile on LeStage’s militia website, which has added more than 1,000 members since its launch last fall.

"(Raugust) is just a friend," LeStage said. "He doesn’t belong to our unit. He is a convicted felon."

LeStage explained that his militia requires each member to obtain a concealed weapons permit. As a felon, Raugust is not allowed to carry weapons, LeStage said.

The patriot movement first peaked in 1994, said Potok, the author of the SPLC report, in the aftermath of deadly confrontations at Ruby Ridge, Idaho, in 1992 and Waco, Texas in 1993, where anti-government groups came under siege by federal authorities.

Membership then dropped sharply during President George W. Bush’s two terms before rebounding in late 2008 after the election of Obama, which created a backlash that included "several plots to murder Obama," according to SPLC.

The numbers of those groups have continued to grow, jumping from 824 in 2010 to 1274 this year, the SPLC said.

'Sovereign citizen' movement
The ailing economy also helped fuel a huge expansion in a subset of the larger Patriot movement — the so-called "sovereign citizens" movement. Followers generally believe they do not have to pay federal taxes or follow most laws. The SPLC estimates some 300,000 Americans are involved in the movement.

In September, the FBI issued a bulletin to law enforcement officials that called "sovereign citizens" a growing domestic threat due to some members’ belief that they can use armed force to resist police.

The bulletin noted that sovereigns have killed six law officers since 2000. In one of the more deadly clashes, a shootout in West Memphis, Ark., in 2010 left four people dead including two officers. Terry Nichols, convicted as a conspirator in the Oklahoma City bombing, was a sovereign citizen.

In 2010, a shootout with a member of the group in West Memphis, Arkansas ended with four people dead, including two policemen.

Last month, a Texas man who said he was a sovereign citizen was sentenced to 35 years in prison for repeatedly firing at a police officer trying to arrest him.

A Washington state man, David R. Myrland, was sentenced in December to 40 months in prison for threatening to "arrest" the mayor of Kirkland and other local officials "with deadly force."

Investigators said Myrland sent an e-mail to the mayor warning that "50 or more concerned Citizens will enter your home and arrest you.  Do not resist, as these Citizens will be heavily armed."

"As sovereign citizens' numbers grow, so do the chances of contact with law enforcement and, thus, the risks that incidents will end in violence," the FBI said at the time.

From LeStage’s point of view, though, the risk comes from the top of government.

If Obama is re-elected this year, "we will probably lose our republic," he said. "We will probably turn into another socialist country."

On his website www.modernmilitiamovement.com, some forum members have raised even more dire concerns about the fall's elections.

"Nov. the 8th should be the start of the next civil war," a member with the username "Thunder" wrote in January. "May GOD guide us safely."

The Murrow News Service is provides local, regional and statewide stories reported and written by journalism students at the Edward R. Murrow College of Communication at Washington State University. Msnbc.com’s James Eng and Kari Huus, and NBC's Pete Williams contributed to this report.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 50

Sovereign citizens?

Sounds to me like The New World Order Oligarchy has found their suckers.

  • 178 votes
#1 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 11:32 PM EST

What scares me is, if civilization does start to break down, that these guys are the ones who will start dictating law; a very rigid white Christian law. Anyone not fitting their racial, ideological, and religious mold will be viewed as a threat and killed. In their minds, might makes right. Scary.

  • 326 votes
#1.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:21 AM EST
Comment author avatarkeckExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

yes.

when the new black panther party states they "need to kill some crackers, and some cracker babies"

you pretty much know they will kill them, as you stated, stand and deliver.

  • 125 votes
#1.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:29 AM EST

the SPLC has been spouting this nonsense since the day Obama got elected, they are the literal personification of white guilt, this article doesnt offer a single shred of evidence that indicates that the increase is a result of Obama being black, the numbers were on the rise before he got elected, and continued to rise after he got elected. the reality is it has more to do with much higher poverty levels (especially among white trash America), also the federal government's recent (post 9/11 and patriot act) vast expansion of its own powers, both in the right it gives itself to kill and imprison Americans and also the increased militarization of the police (think machine guns in squad cars or perhaps UC Davis), new asset forfeiture laws that have turned some sheriff's departments into highway robbers, and the list goes on. the massive and ever-increasing expansion of the fed gov is what's scaring people these days. its pathetic that the SPLC releases these misleading so called facts in their never ending crusade to brand all non-liberals as rabid racists.

  • 220 votes
#1.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:07 AM EST
Comment author avatarMike Davis-433554Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The New World Order?!! You don't need to be a conspiracy theorist to see that the world order has up to this point been white, male, and Christian. Any perceived threat to that order leads to reactions like these militias and the folk there are so F-ed in the head that they think they are the ones being repressed when really it's just the non-white, or non-male, or non-Christian rest of the world finally standing up to them!

  • 183 votes
#1.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:19 AM EST

There's a lot of dumb, dangerous people out there.

And to think it is limited to extremist Christians is highly naive.

Basically, any militia organized thinking the US government is their primary enemy has no basis in realistic thought, and that is regardless of if they are from the left or the right.

  • 178 votes
#1.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:25 AM EST

I dunno, there's not too many Christians out there these days who are okay with people doing things like getting abortions and being gay. I know tolerant Christians exist, but most seem to be pretty threatened by non-Christian beliefs (or even just perceived non-Christian beliefs as dictated by their pastor). Most certainly feel like they should be able to use the government to enforce these beliefs on others and when they feel like they are losing their grip on the government, then they form groups like these.

  • 157 votes
#1.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:30 AM EST
Comment author avatarTheOverlordRestored

Yet again, another demonstration that when religion is mixed with politics disaster is the result.... these armed idiots are part of that disaster. This story also demonstrates that the radical right-wing and crazy rhetoric from the Republicans is dangerous to the country as well as their own party.

  • 185 votes
#1.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:32 AM EST
Comment author avatarsam23-2966130Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Check thier radio listening habits and news sources. These numbskulls are 24/7 hate radio addicts and of course we know where the get thier (news). Faux and urban myth emails.

  • 131 votes
#1.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:55 AM EST
Comment author avatarrradikoRestored

The right-wing AMERICAN TALIBAN ...reactionary, paranoid, armed and dangerous, and on the hunt for YOU.

  • 153 votes
#1.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:02 AM EST

These 'Sovereign Citizens' (SC) are the product of Big Government that has disenfranchised a growing segment of Americans. They are the marginalised, underemployed, jobless, or homeless people as a result of the socialist economic policy of the past 50 years in America that has impoverished the middleclass.

Unable to effect meaningful change in their lives and country as SC see it, they have resorted to forming fraternities in the form of local militias where their ideology finds reinforcement and sympathy.

The growth of the number militia in America is evidence that the socialist economic policy and the perverted and corrupt politicians of DC are creating separtist organizations that some says may cause future succession movements.

  • 107 votes
#1.10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:15 AM EST
Comment author avatarStMillerExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

FatCatGets$700Bil... Nope... They are just a bunch of simple minded reactionary rednecks who can't see the forest for the trees. Everyone of these guys would/will take any unemployment check or welfare or social security or any other form of "socialism" they seem to see as a failure of the system. You can bank on that.

  • 130 votes
#1.11 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:33 AM EST
Comment author avatarstonedog34Restored

Derek the US government is moving in a direction that IS making it a threat to the average citizen. You don't have to be a member of some whacky militia to see that!

Haven't you been paying attention to what congress has been up to?

  • 145 votes
#1.12 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:39 AM EST
Comment author avatarStMillerRestored

Stonedog34... I challenge you to find a single period in the history of the US where people like you didn't claim that the US government wasn't moving in the wrong direction. Every single generation is beset by people who pine for the 'the good ole days'. Let me make it perfectly clear... There never was such a thing.

The rise in the number of these militias is better seen as an indicator of how poor our education system is that it produced such a large number of people that ant be anything but simple minded reactionaries in manner of thinking akin to a palinesque black and white world view.

  • 133 votes
#1.13 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:45 AM EST
Comment author avatarwives fanExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I want Lestage and anyone else with the same thought to provide me with PROOF that Obama has done anything to affect gun ownership. ONE sample of proof is all I ask. If anything, some gun laws have been relaxed by Obama much to my chagrine. These guys are nothing more than KKK without the sheets. They claim it is all about the constitution, blah, blah, blah... at the end of the day, it is because we elected a black president. I'm white, by the way before anyone starts the attack.

  • 147 votes
#1.14 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:14 AM EST
Comment author avatardavid-864430Restored

One more worldwide depression is all it will take. Then they will find out who the real enemy is. He is the one who will rise from the chaos speaking great words of promise, performing miracles, and advocating peace. They will cheer him saying, "peace, peace" and there will be no peace. Only the false peace of subjugation.

  • 53 votes
#1.15 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:16 AM EST
Comment author avatarjones-1576915Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I'm absolutely certain there are many many millions more heavily armed very white proud Americans who are actually true to this Country, believing in our great democracy and to it's principles than all these goofy weekend white warriors who many think they are doing some right-wings mandate to overthrow our government or do God's work all put together. That's beyondlaw enforcement and armed forces. Then there are the other halve of Americans all just as patriotic of color and all of them with the same rights to stockpile lots of arms to defend themselves and our Country, and they do.

Excuse the pun but it would be like a rat crawling up an elephants leg with sex on it's mind. The disappointment would be all theirs unequivocally.

  • 61 votes
#1.16 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:17 AM EST
Comment author avatarlokay5Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Apparently the ignorant, militant, racist rednecks haven't come to terms with the fact that we (they) have a black President.

  • 86 votes
#1.17 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:23 AM EST
Comment author avatarstonedog34Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

StMiller do you know me?

No, I didn't f*ckin think so. You have NO PLACE telling me what is in my best interests, nor do you have any business making claims about me.

The US government:

Doesn't protect me- I have the scars to prove it.

Doesn't serve me-After the incident which led to those scars, I was denied public assistance even though I needed it desperately. In fact, I was forced to turn to crime: growing and selling pot, because it was either that or starve in a ditch.

Doesn't represent me- Increasingly I find myself at odds with every decision the so called 'leaders' of this country make.

Does continue to try and reach ever deeper into MY POCKETS to be able to afford such services for others.

This has NOTHING to do with black or white presidents, or the 'good old days'. I'm young, you dumbass, so I have absolutely no idea how you cooked up that crock of sh*t.

People like you just can't stand that YOUR government sh*ts all over people like me and we're not willing to take it any more.

From now on keep your lackwit assumptions and assertations to yourself.

I will decide what is best for me.

  • 93 votes
#1.18 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:57 AM EST

These people are only a threat to people who would threaten their families and communities. My they prevail over the jack booted thugs from Washington.

  • 64 votes
#1.19 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:09 AM EST
Comment author avatarcheetah-822547Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

"I was denied public assistance even though I needed it desperately. In fact, I was forced to turn to crime: growing and selling pot, because it was either that or starve in a ditch."

Evidently a paid worker had previously dug a ditch and you wanted free money from the Great Satan to lie in it and get high. Instead of the 99ers it's now the 223s.

  • 23 votes
#1.20 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:30 AM EST
Comment author avatarTea TardedExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Cry if you want but the President WILL be REELECTED by the AMERICAN PEOPLE and you @!$%#ing whack jobs will have another FOUR YEARS to stew in your own @!$%#!

@!$%# you and god bless our UNITED STATES of AMERICA!

  • 75 votes
#1.21 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:32 AM EST
Comment author avatarwoodlawn1Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Tea Tarded is exactly the kind of rational level headed American who can sit down with other normal people and peacefully resolve differences and achieve national unity.

Who is the president who has the leadership, education, charisma and charm to calm all these inflammatory remarks.

It certainly isn't Obama. He has demonstrated that he can not even get along with members of his own party.

Of the 43 million registered democrats, Obama is the best they have to offer after seeing what he has done in the last three years? At least the Republicans are having a nasty mud slinging festival, getting everything out in the open. The democrats are tied to Obama like a dog can be chained to a tree.

  • 76 votes
#1.22 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:02 AM EST
Comment author avatarTea TardedExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Yes, a MAN was elected instead of some @!$%#`s son.

Deal with it and plan on dealing for a while to come.

Until there`s a better MAN or WOMAN for the job, keep sniveling.

God Bless the US of A;-)

  • 47 votes
#1.23 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:11 AM EST
Comment author avatarThe Devil-1138528Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Seems to me its all the onerous and unconstitutional BS the government does and the mindless minions seeking handouts that are the real reason people are arming themselves.

  • 106 votes
#1.25 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:12 AM EST
Comment author avatarStrengthInNumbersExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Fatcat - how you can call the last 50 years socialism, is beyond me. In fact, it has been hyper-capitalism that has gutted our economy. Deregulation and the policy of sending our jobs overseas is NOT socialism. Wall Street and the corporations beholden to it has been running roughshod over our economy easily since the 1980s, when the privatization, mergers, and offshoring started with a vengeance. The social contract which helps the "little guy" has been tattered since then.

I have come to a point that I have serious problems with anyone who even feigns to protect the interests of big business over the welfare of communities and individuals.

I have seen my once prospering, or at least surviving - blue-collar community reduced to desperation and despair. Where once there were factories where a man could raise his family on one income, there are now big empty red brick buildings. Where once there were columns and columns of want advertisements for factory workers in the local newspaper, there are a few scam "work at home" job advertisements. The only real jobs left in my community are for social service agencies. The people of my community are demoralized. Dont give me that BS about socialism. I have watched my community and others like it fall down onto it's knees, as it desperately let in the likes of Walmart for any tax revenue, just to end up putting out of business dozens of small businesses.

This is NOT socialism. It is fascism - it is the market-economy rigged to ensure that there is no room for a small business owner.

Socialism would not have allowed for the gutting of my community. Socialism would have ensured TRUE fair trade. Socialism would not have rewarded corporations for closing down factories and shipping the work off overseas. Socialism would not have turned a blind eye to the bussing in of thousands of illegal immigrants BY corporations, to displace American workers - because fed. officials were TOLD to turn a blind eye to it - so the corps could exploit foreign, cheap, untaxed, illegal workers - right here on our own soil.

Not socialism, fatcat. Fascism. Anyone who thinks the harried and demoralized American working man needs MORE austerity when they have been brought to their knees by a free-market economy unregulated, yet rigged to exploit the most vulnerable while funnelling the wealth of the nation into the hands of a few, really has not been paying attention.

I have consciously watched with dismay, the impoverishment of the working class, and now the middle class, since the 1980s. It has been in the forefront of my mind for over a quarter century. Wall Street is a powerful movie because it was pointing out the problem back in the 1980s. But as long as we could just go and eat our popcorn and watch the movie without having to acknowledge that what was being shown on that big screen would affect us PERSONALLY anytime soon - it was all good.

The alarms have been being sounded for over three decades. We as a nation did not come together and protect the working class. We turned a blind eye to their struggles. And now they are coming for YOUR jobs - the middle class, the tech industry worker.

It is NOT socialism. We would be much better off under such a system. And I will NOT sit idly by, fatcat, and let people like you not just be entirely ignorant of what is happening, but also to actually set upon the very people who have been brought to their knees by what is REALLY happening. The little guy is already crawling. What more do you want from these people? Are they supposed to somehow continue to keep on picking themselves up, finding some way to make a living for themselves, only to have the work once again ripped away from them when some big corporation comes along to buy them out?

How do we even begin to recreate and SUSTAIN functional communities under this kind of corporate-megabank-wallstreet tyranny?

No, fatcat - this is what capitalism looks like when it starts to exhibit - and inflict - all of the negatives that Lenin and Marx warned about. If anything, this country is actively giving the Lenin/Marxist philosophy traction. And also, communism is NOT socialism. Two very different things.

How do you think Russia turned into USSR? It was by a massive revolution of the people. Because they had had enough of privation at the hands of a small minority of obscenely wealthy individuals. This is how the French Revolution happened too.

It actually matters very little what form of governance you think is best - what matters is how it is functioning right here and now - and what matters is what is happening in the main streets and how the people of a nation are faring. And in this nation, they are faring poorly.

If this country were to break out into rioting and revolution (and believe me - there is much fear in the strategic arms of the government of the conditions being ripe for such an "issue"), at this point, it has little to do with who is occupying the oval office. In Obama's case, if this country blows it's lid while he is in office, it has next to nothing to do with his policies, and everything to do with decades of Mr. Potters (aka Its a Wonderful Life) attacking the entire nation.

  • 203 votes
#1.26 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:15 AM EST

St.Miller - You are certainly correct that there has always been an undercurrent of mistrust in government. Here in our representive republic, that's a good thing. The difference now is that the government (and Google) have the technology to engage in the unrelenting, unwarranted surveillance of it law-abiding citizens; all done in the interest of "keeping us safe from terrorists". A people under the constant watch of its government has lost its essential liberty making the ability to act freely impossible. In the past, if the government wanted to watch someone they had to do so by having an actual person follow them. Now with cameras, cybersnooping, drones, free no-warrant-needed access to everyone's banking and financial records; the government has the ability (and exercises it) for one person or a small group of people to monitor thousands of individuals at once. You will undoubedly simply label me as paranoid and dismiss me. Let's talk again in a couple of years...

  • 63 votes
#1.27 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:22 AM EST

The militias need to change their tactics from potential violence to changing the political landscape by getting people to vote. Insulting the militias as dumb white males is too broad and isn't really true. They can keep their ideas, think what they want and prepare for the worst but please, if they could, stay out of my business just as they don't want anyone in theirs. This includes harrassing law enforcement and current governments. If they don't like something in the current political situation, do something about it that is within the scope of civil change.

  • 68 votes
#1.28 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:29 AM EST
Comment author avatargrinandbearitExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Woodlawn1,

This is what Obama has done in the last 3 years:

-saved the auto industry, which is now thriving and having its best profitability ever.

-prevented a full-blown depression after that absolute disaster called Bush was finished destroying our economy.

-brought our troops home from Iraq

-brought down the terrorist of Libya Khaddafi

-killed Osama bin Laden

-brought the stock market back from 6700 to 13000

-brought unemployment levels below where it was when he took office

-ended discrimination of gays/lesbians in the military

-brought UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE to this country for the first time in its history!

-has fought for a fairer tax system so that the Mitt Romney's of this country don't pay a lower tax rate than a school teacher.

That's why he will win in Nov. guaranteed. What's your party been up to besides obstructionism? You guys ran out of ideas ages ago. So go away and watch TV or listen to Rush the drug addict. You have nothing to add to this discussion

  • 116 votes
#1.29 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:43 AM EST
Comment author avatarAnIndividualExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Racists +

ingnorance +

convoluted versions of religion +

fear =

big-talking immature males

with guns

playing Army and

proving what idiots

they are

for all to see!

The American Christian Taliban that no "Christian leaders" come out against. That means that that the likes of Graham and Robertson support them.

  • 68 votes
#1.30 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:53 AM EST
Comment author avatar25WalkerExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

"the spike in these groups can be attributed to a combination of factors, including the sluggish economy, radical propaganda and anxiety over the election of a black president, Potok said."

The election of a black president is the major reason many of these Anti-American, racist groups have sprung into existence. Obama's predecessor reigned over a "sluggish economy."

September 11, 2001 gave many Americans a reason to feel anxiety and to feel threatened.

Yet, in spite of the fact that Obama's predecessor tanked our economy, dragged the U.S. into 2 wars, cleaned out the U.S. treasury for the comfortable wealthy, sunk the E.P.A., and significantly "tilted" our "democracy" in favor of the elites - a colossal number of our ill-minded citizens see "the election of an African-American man as president and Commander-In-Chief" as a bigger threat to the sound existence of America.

What do these militias groups want?

- the resurrection and legalization of slavery

- the repeal of voting rights for African-Americans

- mandated "passes" that must be carried to allow African-Americans to travel

- laws forbidding African-Americans to read and write

- laws forbidding African-Americans to own property

- the repeal of voting rights for women

- the illegality of women to own property

- contraception banned

- the elimination of health care for our economically struggling citizens

- the elimination of protective child labor laws

- the elimination of unions

- the elimination of the minimum wage

- the elimination of all federal regulations

the "blue laws" reinstated

- "official" sword duels to settle disputes

- titles such as King, Queen, Lord, Barron, etc bestowed upon certain "aristocrats"

- the "well-heeled" shall be their own judge and jury.

...the Newt Gingrichs and Santorums shall reign over the "illiterate, heathens and commoners!"

It is mind-boggling that a Caucasian "leader" can sink a county, but a president of color who brings improvement frightens people.

Oh...what an ignorant lot we are.

  • 54 votes
#1.31 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:58 AM EST
Comment author avatarJo Ann-666954Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

OMG people. Look at the source of the report -The Southern Poverty Law Center.

Why report this? Is this 100% fact? The media again reporting on something in favor of Obama.

Why doesn't the media report on the NON-transparency of the Obama admin? Obama promised full transparency in the 2008 campaign.

Why does the Obama admin. accept certain men (Bill Maher) to call women sluts and complain when certain men (Rush L.) do the same thing?

Why isn't Gitmo closed? Obama promised this in the 2008 campaign.

Gas prices continue to rise. Why? Obama blamed Bush for the high gas prices in the 2008 campaign?

So many questions and yet these questions are never directly asked to Obama by the media.

I know Obama will just blame someone else when asked like he always does but the media needs to try to ask.

These militias (if there are any) need to direct their anger towards the media. The media is helping Obama get re-elected.

  • 58 votes
#1.32 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:00 AM EST
Comment author avatarNicodemus1946Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

You people rag on the militias but, blindly accept what the SPLC says? How stupid are you people. The SPLC lists those who home school their kids, as potential terrorists. Same for the Boy Scouts. All the while whining about how their needs to be more hand outs for the dead beats who think the world owes them something. Morris Dees is a admitted communist, but for some reason, everyone thinks that's alright. Dees and the SPLC are the true terrorist group, condemning the action of citizens to protect their rights and liberties from an increasingly intrusive government, while forwarding a socialist/communist system. How sad all of you whining about the militia movement are too brainwashed to know the difference. And mindlessly parrot the words of a subversive like Dees.

"Those who beat their guns into plows, will plow for those who do not", Thomas Jefferson.

"A government large enough to give you all you need, is large enough to take all that you have", Benjamin Franklin.

It would seem the founding fathers were far wiser than any of the present political hacks, who's only concern is power and money and holding onto both. No matter who they hurt in the process.

Something you "government knows best" people might consider before it's too late, if it isn't already.

  • 76 votes
#1.33 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:04 AM EST
Comment author avatarIRESPOND-2315268Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

election, economy spark explosive growth of militias

Of course...one more thing to thank the GOP with their corrosive talking about christian values. Santorum should be prosecuted for inflammatory rhetoric, aimed to create violence and unrest.

Thanks GOP, for taking us to the days of the old west..now we all going to go out the door with a weapon....

Vote democrat to bring America forward not backwards...sent the GOP back to the dark ages, where they belong.

  • 44 votes
#1.34 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:04 AM EST

StrengthInNumbers --

This is NOT socialism. It is fascism

Thank you. The ignorance of the average American today is breath-taking. They are like teenagers who constantly mistake their emotions for reality and repeat some buzzword without having the least understanding of what they're talking about.

But it's too late for that to matter. We've lost our most basic and important Constitutional right: habeas corpus, and these childish morons let that happen without a squeak, while constantly screaming about their Constitutional right to own guns, as if they really believe they're going to duke it out with the U.S. government.

All they're going to accomplish is to provide the excuse for military law and the final destruction of the Constitution. The populace is so stupid that as long as the labels are right--such as Patriot Act--(a label that gives me the willies still today), they will never notice that the Constitution has indeed become "nothing more than a g@damn piece of paper." But hey, they'll still be able to buy a gun at WalMart, so they'll be crowing about their freedom.

How ironic if the militias are the ones who finally destroy the USA.

  • 95 votes
#1.35 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:05 AM EST
Comment author avatarJ R BrowensteinExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Why do people keep calling Obama a "black" President? Obama has a white mother...he's not "black", he's mixed race. Calling him a "black" man only demonstrates ingrained racist views...that if there's even the hint of African blood, then someone is "black".

Or...I could be wrong. Take a can of white paint for example: if you put ANY color tint in it, is it still "white"...? If it's not white, then it's colored....so I guess you can make the argument either way, I suppose.

I don't think he's black...the guy just can't dance.

  • 44 votes
#1.36 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:21 AM EST

It's important to note that "Militia's" are specifically part of the 2nd. Amendment....This was no accident.

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution
, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788"

http://www.constitution.org/mil/cs_milit.htm

A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained
in arms, is the best most natural defense of a free country.
James
Madison

For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a
well-organized and armed militia is their best security.
Thomas
Jefferson

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/keywords/militia.html

The United States of America is NOT the Federal Government.....It is The People.

  • 112 votes
#1.37 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:27 AM EST
Comment author avatarTea TardedExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Well yea, and the 18th century church...

  • 14 votes
#1.38 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:34 AM EST
Comment author avatarNanette-2317272Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I have very little knowledge of these groups. From this article and the other one today regarding a Marine that said he would not follow orders he does not believe are right, all I see is people are scared. The numbers are growing fast it appears. My thoughts are these.

1. There is a threat of nuclear war with Iran, that could go really bad.

2. I can not find anything that says the economic issues facing the world, have found a way forward and only continue to get worse.

3.Detention camps all over America being brought on line by FEMA

I found myself wanting to respond to the article about the Marine and being afraid to say my piece because Big Brother is watching. Our rights are being eroded one by one and some cases many at the same time.

Can anyone really say that if things really do go sideways that you would want the Marines to blindly follow orders? Can anyone really say that they would not want people to stand up against a government that is reinterpreting the Constitution to meet their own desires?

I am not justifying the path these people are taking as being the correct thing to do, but can certaintly understand where they are coming from. People do stupid things when they are scared. People have a right to be scared right now. I was talking with a friend about this and mentioned that ignorance would be bliss . They said no, be prepared for what may come, hope for the best, get on with your life.

People mention that voting is the way to resolve the issues. I find this a joke. Just look at what is going on now. We are all pretty much agreeing with the fact that we are going to vote for the lessor of all evils. The lessor of all evils is still evil.

I would rather see people rising up than a country filled will apathy.

  • 76 votes
#1.39 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:37 AM EST
Comment author avatarkjunmeExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Hey stengthinnumbers, News flash buddy. It is not wall streets or the governments faults. It is the average working mans fault. First of all I am a working man and I too graduated from school and stared working for a living in the early 80's.

Average working people are the ones that shop at the dollar stores, etc. it is us that didn't heed the warning when they were burning japanese cars in California in the early 80's warning the American people that buying foreign goods would mean the end of USA jobs. They didn't shut down all the factories in America all at once and just start building all of the products in china and other cheap labored countries and not giving us a choice. You see they closed some factories and we hard working people started buying the cheaper priced product and that my friend told the business people that we preferred cheaper products over good paying jobs.

Now who can fix this problem? We can and it will take only months to get the message across. When you go shopping look for MADE IN AMERICA and if you cannot find it do WITH OUT. Go home get on the net and find it there. I am not a highly educated man but I do know how supply and demand works and that if you want something bad enough you may have to suffer a little to get it.

So quit blaming the government,get off of you ass and do something to fix the problem.

  • 45 votes
#1.40 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:43 AM EST
Comment author avatarmachineheadExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

carolanne1 -The ignorance of the average American today is breath-taking. They are like teenagers who constantly mistake their emotions for reality and repeat some buzzword without having the least understanding of what they're talking about.

This describes exactly the modern left in this country. They are manipulated and conditioned by the mass (leftist) media to believe that government is the answer to all problems, and so must be given all the power, funding, and legal authority to force the people to fall in line. They allow the constitution to be called an "outdated document" - implying that it must be changed to allow more governmental powers. The overreaching tyranny of an all-powerful government is the reason the revolution was fought in the first place, and now we have people wanting this kind of tyranny all over again.

This time, however, the people are being led by the nose like lambs to the slaughter to an all-powerful global monstrosity, and they're going willingly because they have been conditioned to believe that promoting such is the way to "equality" and "anti-racism".

When groups emerge who want to stem the tide against oppression and tyranny, the media, with the help of the anti-white communist sympathizers in the SPLC, will generate as much fear and hate speech as possible to turn the masses against them.

Your children and grandchildren will live as economic slaves with no motivation, no freedom and no future, but they will have "free" healthcare, and can say they're not "racists".

  • 48 votes
#1.41 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:52 AM EST
Comment author avatardudoggerExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Doomsday Preppers on steriods. Gee, Nanette, what exactly do you suppose they're 'rising up' for, anyway? FEMA detention camps? Seriously?! Who would be detained, do you suppose? Violent TeaBaggers? You better stock up on duct tape, plastic, and lots of ammo, baby!

Watch out, machinehead, Doomsday is creeping into your back yard...

  • 33 votes
#1.42 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:58 AM EST
Comment author avatarPurnell Meagre Jr.Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

THese groups - like many fringe groups are inherently self-limiting. In words even a totally crazed Person can understand - the government has biggger, bettter and more guns; In the unlikely vent the govrnment wants to come around and confiscate somebody's 9mms they will confiscate it. I doubt many of these crazies will decide to become assassins - a despicable cowards way of dealing with the world. We live in a flawed world and country but one in which there is hope.

  • 17 votes
#1.43 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:58 AM EST
Comment author avatarMark VanGelder-1693883Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Anyone who believes in religious nonsense has screws loose in their head already.

  • 31 votes
#1.45 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:06 AM EST
Comment author avatarrealist ponderingExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Nannette-seek counseling-your level of fear has irrational pinnings and your mental health is in question.

  • 20 votes
#1.46 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:10 AM EST
Comment author avatarHOTTICKET-2304234Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

OMG people. Look at the source of the report -The Southern Poverty Law Center.

Exactly right. None other than those sukking off the government teet. About the only types of people our government is good for and caters to, anyhow. The working, LEGAL, ENGLISH SPEAKING, and taxpaying citizens like you me? We don't need it. But we get the shaft, of course.

  • 25 votes
#1.47 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:13 AM EST

Nicodemus1946

You people rag on the militias but, blindly accept what the SPLC says? How stupid are you people.

Nicodemus,

There are many legitimate sources that factually affirm that these extremist groups and militias do exist.

These more than "fringe" elements are overtly and subtly "nestled" in the good ole U.S.A.

There is nothing more "stupid" than to look at the facts about these many undemocratic groups and then obtusely deny or lie that they exists.

  • 34 votes
#1.48 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:16 AM EST

StrengthInNumbers....you have, in so many eloquent, well thought out words, said it all, my friend!! I have nothing to add to your post, other than "thank you" for cutting through all the misinformation about the true cause of our economic situation. Truly, unfettered capitalism, if allowed to continue, will be the death of this country, as the "haves" will be the land barons and the growing masses of the "have nots" will not even get the shot to make anything of their lives.

Bravo!!

  • 50 votes
#1.49 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:18 AM EST

The turning point for the growth of militias wasn't President Obama's election as much as the passing of the Patriot Act by George W. Bush nearly 7 years earlier. Many militia members wish to end ALL government, and their hate goes out to both Democrats and Republicans alike. It would probably be even worse if Hillary had won the Democratic nomination and Presidential election in 2008 (I used to travel, and local yokel right wing talkers have some serious issues with Mrs. C) !!

The only current Presidential candidate who might slow the growth of militias would be Ron Paul, and I think it's all but over for him. I expect more serious trouble to be made by these chaps and chapettes over the next few years, especially if President Obama is reelected and Democrats win back the House and put Nancy Pelosi back in as Speaker (I was overseas when she started her first reign, but I'm sure if I'd still been traveling the right wing radio talkers would have the same anger management issues with her they had with Hillary in the '90's).

  • 17 votes
#1.50 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:20 AM EST
Comment author avatarASignOfTheTimesExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

This story is so phony. Anything to sell news

  • 17 votes
#1.51 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:24 AM EST

caroleann - I fully support the right to bare arms. It is in our Bill of Rights for a reason. To defend ourselves against a tyrannical government. The government that represents the people, has nothing to fear from an armed citizenry. The first thing a tyrannical government does, is confiscate the means of defense of the people. It is true that where guns are banned, the criminal element will still obtain them. I dont love firearms. But they are a necessary evil...

kajun- I pointed out the culpability of the people in my original post. I alluded to it in the fact that we turned a blind eye to the working class back in the 1970s and 1980s. I remember the ads, and the futile struggle of the blue-collar unions urging Americans to buy American. Corporations though, have much stronger "lobbying" abilities. We have sold our souls to the company store. I hold us all culpable. We have gotten to the point that we have no CHOICE but to buy foreign. The keyboard I type upon being a case in point. I go out of my way to buy American (which nowadays means buying vintage). I despise the Chinese made chotchkes more than anything else. It is one thing to be compelled to buy Chinese goods that we require for daily life, because we have no other options. Its entirely another to buy useless trinkets and toys, and excessive fashionable clothing just to feed our maws for STUFF to make us feel better - most bought on credit, of course. I find that repulsive. I have repeated over and over to friends and family to please, for gifts, give me flowers, give me something home-made, give me a HUG for goodness sake, but please hold on the chinese stuffed animals and other silly little things I have no use for, and that would be much more special if made here at home. But they still gift me with these things. Of course, I smile, I say thankyou - but I am thinking ... WHY?!??!?

So, kajun- because there are far too many that are oblivious to the plight they are in and that they have allowed themselves to be victimized by this dysfunctional economy - is it ok that all should suffer the gutting of the economy, and that the corporations should be lauded or otherwise given free reign to continue exploiting the ignorant? It is up to people like you and I to wake up as many of these sleepwalking consumers as we can. Thats about the best we can do at this point...

  • 36 votes
#1.52 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:31 AM EST
Comment author avatarLogicReguiredExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

A recycled, tired story line thrown out there again to remind the Obama-bots their stereo types are not misguided. You know they are politically motivated when they write a story about a group that hasn't been relevant for years if ever, while ignoring groups that have caused damage and harm like ELF, and certain occupy movement cohorts (rapes, murder, destruction of property). So enjoy your red meat bots, intelligent folks whether they be democrat or republican will see this story for the crap it is.

  • 14 votes
#1.53 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:36 AM EST

Tweaking the economic and political systems we currently have is all that needs to be done. There is no need to throw out the baby along with the bath water. Finally we have a leader in the White House and people simply want to hate him.

People who would pick up weapons in order to force their vision onto others are no better than any terrorist.

  • 18 votes
#1.54 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:40 AM EST

The tooth fairy is more real to me than this crap from the Southern Poverty Law Center. Robert Mueller was up on the hill yesterday, ( is it just me or does he really look like Dick Tracy?). When asked if the new laws for "drones" allowed for an American citizen to be whacked from the sky while sitting in their own back yard on American soil he scratched his head and said he wasn't sure about that part and needed to reread the law. Hey look ma, it's a bird, it's a plane, it's......./____!

  • 18 votes
#1.55 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:41 AM EST

dudogger... good question...who do YOU think the dentention camps are for????

  • 12 votes
#1.56 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:44 AM EST

I love these types of articles. They certainly bring the kookoos from the woodwork and we've got a boatload of 'em today.

Not wanting to interrupt the paranoid discourse, I'd like to offer two comments:

1- the militia was set up in a time when the country did not have a large standing army to protect it from foreign invaders NOT other citizens or the government. The right to bare arms is encompassed in this intent. I doubt the founding fathers ever concieved of automatic weapons that can shoot hundreds of rounds a minute in the hands of some dad from Minnesota.

2- the military will NEVER side with the government if the citizenry decide to rise up. This is not some third world cesspool where the military is one of the few areas that is well paid. In fact they are poorly paid, abused mercilessly and tossed aside when their time is done. They come from the citizenry and will return to if they are required to fire upon their own.

The police are another matter.

  • 30 votes
#1.57 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:44 AM EST

I think militias are a good thing and more people should start and get involved in them they don't have to be right wing just prepared for unrest as Katrina taught us when things go wrong the government can't be counted on i think gays should start militias or any other group of people that doesn't want to be left defenseless when the government fails to serve and protect them you have to remember that this article is just recycled FBI propaganda less than .1% of these people are criminals that's allot less than the general population most are like clubs and they do allot more than train they hunt,fish.play cards and pool,have cookouts their wives and kids are involved in family activities.The government just doesn't like anybody who has any power they can't control including self reliance.So talk to your sewing club about self defense and buy your mom a gun you'll feel better in the long run

  • 23 votes
#1.58 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:54 AM EST
Comment author avatarckelley116Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

@zuksam - Punctuation is your friend.

  • 11 votes
#1.59 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:56 AM EST

We wouldn't have these crazy nutcase groups if we didn't have a corporately funded Government or rather crook Government..With no good jobs looming promised from our POTUS what can we expect.

  • 15 votes
#1.60 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:56 AM EST

The right to bare arms is encompassed in this intent. I doubt the founding fathers ever concieved of automatic weapons that can shoot hundreds of rounds a minute in the hands of some dad from Minnesota.

Whether they considered it or not I don't know, but guns in the hands of a father in Minnesota is something they would have embraced.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
Thomas Jefferson, Proposed Virginia Constitution, 1776

"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."
Thomas Jefferson (attributed without source)

Just to quote a few.

the military will NEVER side with the government if the citizenry decide to rise up. This is not some third world cesspool where the military is one of the few areas that is well paid. In fact they are poorly paid, abused mercilessly and tossed aside when their time is done

Tell this to the Germans, Italians, and Russians! None a third world nation, none had some rich pay for the average soldier, and all have had there military used to round up citizens that opposed tyranny of a corrupt government.

  • 23 votes
#1.61 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:01 AM EST

Hey Lusi, corporations are people too!

  • 5 votes
#1.62 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:02 AM EST

The party of hate, the party of no, the party of me first and the party of my God's the only God should better listen to their own dogma: For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind: it hath no stalk: the bud shall yield no meal: if so be it yield, the strangers shall swallow it up.

  • 13 votes
#1.63 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:07 AM EST

FatCatGets$700Bil

These 'Sovereign Citizens' (SC) are the product of Big Government that has disenfranchised a growing segment of Americans. They are the marginalised, underemployed, jobless, or homeless people as a result of the socialist economic policy of the past 50 years in America that has impoverished the middleclass.

You've got it wrong, FatCat.

It is not the government that has impoverished the middle class, but the greed and power of corporate America. Jobs are being shipped overseas, wages are low, benefits are hard to come by. Corporations own our politicians. This is not a socialist country.

If you want to live here, you have to abide by the same social contract as every other citizen, pay your taxes, follow the law, and effect change at the voting booth. Using weapons will never work, and we have numerous examples of that throughout history.

Impoverished people are better off here than they are just about anywhere else on Earth. The sense of entitlement that some people have seems to be the new mindset, and a very destructive one both personally and for society as a whole. The SC people should leave if they don't like the U.S. I challenge them to find any country that wants them. What a bunch of whiners!

In my opinion, the root of the militia movement arises from their inability to accept the demographic changes that will remake the U.S. cultural and political landscape in the coming decades. White Christian males have until now been at the top of the heap... some cannot cope with sharing power with women, minorities (who are poised to become the majority), and those of other religious, cultural and political persuasions.

Combine bigotry with ignorance, arrogance and guns, and you have a recipe for trouble.

I think the way to deal with these militias is first of all to educate American children with attitudes of tolerance, acceptance and cooperation in public schools.

Those heavily-armed groups have earned the scrutiny and scorn of people who want to live in peace, and they should be dealt with harshly. They might want to remember how it worked out for David Koresh and his 'followers'.

And they should take a close look in the mirror if they think they are anything like Christ.

  • 25 votes
#1.64 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:17 AM EST

We are just one major economic crisis from entering the Mad Max world. You better believe it. When real SHTF you better hope to be at least somewhat prepared.

  • 19 votes
#1.65 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:20 AM EST
Comment author avatarDavid-1250323Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Illegal immigrants have killed more people than all of these groups combined. Where's the outrage about that?

  • 24 votes
#1.66 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:22 AM EST

This would be expected.

These Fascist nutjobs are fearful of everything.

And with incendiaries like Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, etc. to whip their unfounded fears these people are driven into various states of mental illness and paranoia.

.

  • 25 votes
#1.67 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:24 AM EST

Joann-Hes our president you a$$

  • 6 votes
#1.68 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:25 AM EST

realist pondering...

I find nothing irrational about questioning things that ARE happening.

I find it not rational in a government that is so grossly misspending and funding detention camps at a time when the money would be better spent in other places.

I find it not rational that a government is no longer listening to the people and moving on their own agenda.

I find it not rational that some are dismissing the fact that more and more people are falling into poverty, apathy, and fear. Sometimes you have to call if for what it is. Once the problem is brought out and defined, only then can you move on correcting it. To negate it is irrational.

  • 23 votes
#1.69 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:27 AM EST

To J R Browenstein. Not that it makes a bit of difference but there are campaign speeches of President Obama addressing his constituents with his hipster humor that he is so good at saying something along the lines of "by the way, did I mention I'm black?"

He was pretty funny for sure. Good delivery of it.

  • 3 votes
#1.70 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:30 AM EST

@wives fan:

Eric Holder on congressional testimony on Fast and Furious.

“This administration has consistently favored the reinstitution of the assault weapons ban. It is something that we think was useful in the past with regard to the reduction that we’ve seen in crime, and certainly would have a positive impact on our relationship and the crime situation in Mexico.”

Obama’s most lasting impact on gun control is likely to be through the federal court judges he appoints. His most visible appointments have been the gun-control advocates he has made to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan headed up President Clinton’s push for gun control when she worked for his White House during the 1990s. And Justice Sonia Sotomayor has signed on to a Supreme Court opinion stating that there is no individual right to "private self-defense" with guns.

The pro-gun control views of Obama’s nominees have played a role the Senate filibustering of two Appeals Court nominees. Caitlin Joan Halligan was particularly controversial when nominated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit because she opposes an individual’s right to self defense and – even more damning -- she was one of the trial lawyers who had sued gun makers. Thus in New York v. Sturm & Ruger, she argued that gun makers should be liable for the criminal acts of third parties but not given any credit for the benefits from self-defense.

The administration nominated Andrew Traver, someone who supports gun bans, as the head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.

Obama has stuck by Traver despite his nomination being stalled in the Senate for a year and the fierce opposition it has generated.

  • 11 votes
#1.71 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:36 AM EST

I find it comical when I read an article like this and see there are soooo many people posting who find it so easy to just slap a broad paint brush label on the people involved; "those crazy right wing gun toting Christians again".

If you are so naive to think that there are only radical beliefs on one side of the isle or from one "view" in this country, than you really do have problems. These people are no more radical or crazy than the tree hugging morons that feel we should stop all drilling and mining NOW to force everyone to convert over to wind and solar energy TODAY and "so what" if the entire economy comes to a halt. Have a little more depth of intelligence to see that these people do not represent the true Christian view, just as much as the Taliban does not represent the true Muslim faith, and just as much as the tree hugging crazies do not represent Democratic party view.

Bottom line, the bigger the US government gets, the more freedoms and liberties are taken. The further we get into debt, the more tax burden there is on everyone. The more freedoms and liberties are taken along with more tax burden equals people snapping and wanting to overthrow the system. Look back on history and see how many great nations fell due to these exact situations. OUR COUNTRY WAS FORMED BECAUSE OF THESE EXACT ISSUES and now we are moving closer to causing the very problems our founding fathers swore not to allow.

If our politicians don't get ther act straight and start doing the job correclty (what's best for the country and not for who keeps them in office), there will be more of this all over the country, rest assured.

  • 20 votes
#1.72 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:36 AM EST

Don't be scared of citizens with guns, it would be more fearful is if citizens were not allowed to own reasonable and common weapons for then the power would shift toward government. If you are scared, go get a gun to even things out. Let me recommend a 12 gage pump shotgun since it is both inexpensive and effective.

  • 19 votes
#1.73 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:40 AM EST

Before you rail off on this realize that right here in the in Michigan we have 4 of the top most dangerous cities, Detroit, Pontiac,Saginaw and Flint. In the last few months 16 people have been shot and killed, several of them children under 12 and elderly. Whats the difference between " Militia" And "Street Gangs" I live here and never go anywhere with out a carry weapon. My wife is handicapped....... to them she is an easy target, like the crippled 82 year old man who was carjacked last week, the young man broke his leg and climbed over him to get into the gas station store

  • 8 votes
#1.74 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:42 AM EST

Media and government and people shouldnt theorize about their fears and their ideology. Apply the laws and arrest them.

Also I wonder if these groups are concentrated in some states more than others.

  • 4 votes
#1.75 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:43 AM EST

"He’s been after our guns," LeStage said. "Obama’s been the best gun salesman there ever was."

----------------------------------------

Let me understand this: President Obama's been AFTER your guns, yet you and your ilk have bought MORE guns? That doesn't make any sense. Next thing you'll tell me is if hadn't been elected, you'd have brought LESS guns. Lunatic(s)....

  • 20 votes
#1.76 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:48 AM EST

machinehead -- You get it! Thanx.

Yes, the left is amazingly easily led. The latest mindset took since the mid-60's until the Obama election to gain control. Actually, I should say the Reid/Pelosi "leadership" was the precursor to Obama. Now we have half the population pretty much to the point of not being able to wipe is collective butt without gov't assistance.

Amazing how few know that there are survival-minded militias out there. Ones who train members specifically how to aid in disasters of all kinds, not in paramilitary procedures. Of course, Big Brother always flat-out refuses their help in local disasters. So much for We the People.

  • 12 votes
#1.77 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:49 AM EST

Along with record unemployment, failing small businesses, destroyed families, and economic despair, this is all part of the "Change you can believe in".

  • 11 votes
#1.78 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:49 AM EST

Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.

Teach a man to fish, and he eats for a lifetime.

Take away the man's fishing pole, and dynamite the pond to grab all the fish at once, and he picks up a gun and comes for your fish.

  • 27 votes
#1.79 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:55 AM EST

We all are being played!! Come on, this whole article is to set the stage. Remember NDAA was just passed.

http://www.hstoday.us/industry-news/general/single-article/crs-analysis-american-detention-fears-are-overblown/82d759472a23552ae9ece160b1dc2780.html

"Claims that the recently enacted National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2012 (NDAA) has given the federal government the power to militarily detain US citizens arrested in the US on charges of terrorism appear to have been overblown, according to a new Congressional Research Service (CRS) report."

The people of Germany didn't see or chose not to see or believe what their government was up to. Look past the immediate and take a look at the bigger picture here.

This is frightening because I'm choosing to see the truth about what is happening. And I agree, it's not an Obama thing -- it's all government officials who have gone along with stripping Americans of their constitutional rights little by little, coming in through the back door like the NDAA and Patriot Act.

Hey, it's time to realize the truth.

  • 28 votes
#1.80 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:57 AM EST

Where are the Moderators on this thread?

The problem with America is everybody is becoming an extreme zealot.

We may disagree, but it hardly warrants a "@!$%# you". ^

  • 5 votes
#1.81 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:57 AM EST
Comment author avatarJNagaryaExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

All these _fake— "militia" are REICH wing. And ALL are hate groups, who hate foremost the Founders and Constitution/gov't/rule of law. This is the Founders response to these loons:

US Con., Art. I., S. 8, C. 15. The Congress shall have Power To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, (and( SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS.

These dumber-than-dead-rocks loons are a domestic enemy, as the OK City bombing demonstrated.

  • 12 votes
#1.82 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:58 AM EST

Strengthinnumbers - Great post. Tell it like it is.

  • 6 votes
#1.83 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:00 AM EST

Ohhhh where to start where to start? I cannot start to mention comments to others by name so I will try to summarize for those people that made those comments. Not that I think it will matter because it definitely seems as though their education level would stop them from understanding the comments anyway.

@ the person stating the "facts" about all that Obama has done for this country. Please do your research before trying place him on a pedestal for achieving more than any other president.
-Dont forget the "fast and furious" debacle
-Obama did not kill Osama, ST6 did
By the way, that community does not do what they do for recognition, we are quiet professionals that love doing the job for our country even though we know no one will know who did it or when.
*That was a super fail on behalf of the commander is queef
*Also, Bush would thank the military for the jobs they did, Obama takes credit for it with his "I" speeches. Do the research, watch the videos and see for yourself, unless you cannot handle the truth.

-Research about gun control, supreme court and the "hidden" gun laws that were placed into certain bills to be hidden and approved by the president. Who was it hidden to.... the republicans. Why? So they would vote for the bill without knowing the hidden agendas hiding inside. They were caught, thank goodness

What else? Lets see........Putting the militias onto the all white. Granted I will give you that the majority are all white and probably believe that what they are doing is right. they are a cancer to the white race and are not doing anything beneficial in our society today. Going after law enforcement and then planning on going after more is not going to help their situation at all and they should be dealt with for that.

I find it funny that the media will bring the attention to the white militias and exploit thier plans and their actions, which, if they are breaking the law then they should be dealt with, and the media will not talk about or write anything about the terrorist training camps in the US. What about those? So they are watched by our federal agencies, so what? The agencies will not be able to act UNTIL something is done by them. So they buy up our land and then train their people on our land just so they can attack better.

I train people everyday for combat situations and the media is definitely not calming people down, nor are any of the television shows with such shows as "doomsday preppers" and "bumker builders" and such. It has made so many people start to react and expand their conspiracy theories. If it comes down to mayhem and people against people, it will be a very bad time for everyone.

I definitely can tell you that no matter who takes office, Dem or Repub, they will be hated by someone and there will be people that constantly bash those people because this has become a society of finger pointers and not problem solvers. I know that I am prepared for anything but not everything. I have been trained well and will continue to train to keep my skills up and protect my family.

It is time to grow up and wear your big boy/girl panties now. If you never realize that you are a part of the problem then you will find that your existence will be one of suffering because you will be part of the victims that kick their feet and try to take their ball and go home. But you wont have a home. It is great to be prepared but even better to be open minded and level headed. That is what will prevail. I refuse to teach doomsday courses or zombie courses because that would cause me to omit my ethics and morals and I refuse to ever do that.

If you are that worried about things, find a course, take a course and take care of your family. Be prepared to defend your property against those that try to harm you and keep your head on straight. The militias may try to do what they think is right but eventually their structure will crumble as soon as someone disagrees with the order. Then it will be person against person.

What do you think the other countries are going to do if/when this happens? I think that they will use that time to conduct their takeover of our country while our country is so consumed with it collapsing on itself. So for those of you that stand on your political soapbox and bash one side or the other and constantly play the blame game I say good luck to you and hope you dont fall on your face too hard.

  • 8 votes
#1.84 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:06 AM EST

Fronts for racially motivated crime. The election of Obama triggered more because he is black, he is far from socialist and the reason some democrats don't like him as much is because he is considered far too conservative.

He reluctantly signed the NDAA into law for his administration-it was a bipartisan bill by congress. It essentially is no different than the patriot act was that was initiated by Bush.

When someone said no one needs to fear us but socialists or communists-the problem is and what really is scary about it is that they choose to believe anyone that doesn't believe in their extremist evangelical racially motivated hate movement has to be a socialist or a communist.

They are as many have said, under educated, jobless and attracted to a movement that gives them a voice.

  • 13 votes
#1.85 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:07 AM EST

Is it really any wonder? 11 years of war and paranoia is bound to change the nation!

  • 12 votes
#1.86 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:10 AM EST

Media and government and people shouldnt theorize about their fears and their ideology. Apply the laws and arrest them.

Arrest them for what? Is playing army on the weekends illegal?

  • 12 votes
#1.87 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:18 AM EST

There is absolutely nothing Christian about a militia. The whole point of the cross, was that violent action, war, oppression, torture, the spear, the sword, the machine gun, - all followed the path of sin and death. When Jesus said to Peter, "those who take up the sword shall perish by the sword" - do they think they get a free pass for being Christians - the guard that arrested Jesus were sent by the temple priests! These people daily disgrace the name of Christ and are the biggest reason young people are turning away from Christianity.

As for being patriots? They aren't patriots either. They can sing mom, apple pie, chevrolet, and capitalism all day long, but civilian militia's and sovereign citizens, trample the freedoms and democratic rights of their fellow citizens - that's why they are arrested. These fear mongering numbskulls are seditionists not patriots. Their ideology denies freedom to anyone who is not "like them".

When Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, or Bill O'Reilly gets on a tv or radio and tells them that Sandra Fluke was talking about getting paid by the government to have sex - these people believe that was her testimony - even though her testimony is available to read - and she said nothing even remotely close to that!

Ignorance, prejudice, fear - are the ways of sin and death. And they have nothing to do with Jesus Christ, Freedom, or Patriotism.

  • 19 votes
#1.88 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:23 AM EST
Comment author avatarI'm just saying...Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Shouldn't the title read "Ignorance, intolerance spark explosive growth of militias"?

  • 14 votes
#1.89 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:27 AM EST

kaybeetoys

If you want to live here, you have to abide by the same social contract as every other citizen, pay your taxes, follow the law, and effect change at the voting booth.

You mean like the way the "illegals" or "undocumenteds" do? There are far more of those here than militia people.

  • 14 votes
#1.91 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:36 AM EST

Boy.......I wish people were more aware and educated:

The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America.

Our country is a Democratic Republic, meaning a rule of the majority. It was NEVER a Democracy...that word has a different meaning all together, please get this straight. Educate yourself between those two forms of government.

Our representatives are suppose to follow the Constitution of the United States of America. As read in the Constitution, we are sovereign individuals according to the law of the land. Back in the day (and yes even now) you could choose to be an American National or be a Citizen. Again look up the root meaning of those words. The problem now the government doesn't want you being a Sovereign person. Freedom is under scrutiny. A free man is the most dangerous ideal to the establishment. Hence the second amendment and the rest of the constitution.

I'm not all about the left and the right, red versus blue....that is a ploy of the government for the people to fight against each other while the government runs a muck. I'm all about what is right and our constitution guarantee's that right.

Learn the difference between lower case and upper case meanings of your name: e.g. John Doe and JOHN DOE.

Learn why admiralty law is on land......gold fringe around the U.S. Flag in a court room.

Finally......The Federal Reserve Note is a debt based money system. Our founding fathers said in the constitution, money is to be issued (backed by gold and silver) user and DEBT free.

Wanna know our problems.......start reading the real history of our country and the Constitution of the United States.

Quit pointing fingers and take responsibility..............peace to you all...may you be healthy, happy and prosperous.

  • 27 votes
#1.92 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:36 AM EST

Right wing crazies ride on. This is pretty much the *exact* cycle that resulted in the Oklahoma City bombing. Right wingers hyperventilating on the airwaves with a wink-wink-nudge-nudge to the gun nuts and crazies, setting up the environment where organized armed treason is OK. And then when somebody takes them up on it, they run for cover denying they had anything to do with it.

  • 10 votes
#1.93 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:41 AM EST

This is not news it is negative propaganda bent on discrediting the smart people who are prepping for the worst that is to come.. These Sovereign wacko jobs are pissed because they have to pay Federal taxes.. Run away spending has made that a sore spot for almost all middle-class tax payers.. What the politicians did to the Social Security fund is criminal but none will ever be brought to justice.. After "borrowing" all the money which amounted to well over a trillion dollars now they claim that the money was not the peoples to begin with so they don't owe us anything?? If they would have left it alone the interest would be paying for us to retire at 55 not 72 and be giving every child a college education.. The reason the Sovereigns are after law enforcement is just misplaced anger because they lost judgements and thus their homes and possessions.. They go after the poor cop who has to evict them and do the dirty work.. So far as all militias being White Christian, what a bunch of bull$hit.. There are a whole bunch of non white only and mixed groups.. I consider all inner-city gangs to be militias as they are armed and organized.. In fact they are worse because they exert control over an area through force and have killed more law enforcement and civilians then all the other Militia and paramilitary groups ever.. Most of these groups that are forming over the last 5 years are more worried about the social breakdown that will occur when our propped up economy finally tanks.. Giving over a trillion dollars to rich bankers was wrong, very few of the jackals who screwed us have ever even been investigated or charged.. Now the government is printing billions of dollars of new currency and that will cause inflation as the value continues to drop ripping off everyone using it.. All you have to do is look at Mexico or any other third world country and you will see what they fear.. Heavily armed gangs taking over areas and setting up criminal enterprises for profit.. By far most groups support law enforcement and the military like they did 250 years ago.. What they do not support is a government full of profiteers and corporate stooges trampling our nation for the all mighty buck.. Electing a junior senator to the oval office no matter what race or color is a mistake because someone is pulling his strings and using him as a puppet.. Hillary Clinton controlled Bill after he was caught cheating and now she controls Obama because he was not born here and had a father who was not a citizen.. She is the unseen hand and good at being the puppet master, being for all intensive purposes the President..

  • 8 votes
#1.94 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:42 AM EST

Domestic terrorism is going to be our biggest security threat over the next decade. We don't need to worry as much about Iran, North Korea, or even groups in the Middle East if we have groups within our borders already planning terrorist activities well under the radar of our domestic security checkpoints.

The GOP and neo-conservatives always use imply that terrorism always has to have an Islamic or foreign component to it to be considered a threat and that anything else is just a few individuals acting on their own. They are obviously afraid of losing these people supporting domestic terrorism as voters and pandering to them to get through this and other election cycles. Courting with the devil is a dangerous game. If (or more likely when) any militia groups do launch any attacks or uprisings, they will be attacking, maiming, and killing conservatives and GOP supporters as indiscriminately as anyone else. Terrorists don't have issues with killing their own sympathizers when launching mass attacks. They're just considered martyrs to the cause.

Liberal leaning militias are an option, but also head us towards a civil war. The only real option is for the CIA , FBI, and local police to spend as much or more intelligence preventing potential attacks from these domestic groups as they are spending on groups outside the U.S..

  • 7 votes
#1.95 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:42 AM EST

I think those militias picked the wrong fight, as long as the US government stays strong, they are doomed for defeat. This is not the time when the Minutemen very close matched the British weaponry.

  • 4 votes
#1.96 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:43 AM EST
Comment author avatarcommonsense....Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

the "patriot" movement as made up of conspiracy-minded individuals who see the federal government as their primary enemy.

These guys aren't patriots. They are not true to the Constitution or the ideals on which our great nation was founded.

In the Muslim world, these people would have joined Osama bin Laden or a like-minded group, long ago.

And though they have the right to bear arms like the rest of us red-blooded, God-fearing Americans, they are not the "militias" protected by the Constitution.

You can stick a feather in your hat and legally change your last name to 'President', but that won't make you Commander in Chief of our armed forces.

  • 9 votes
#1.97 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:45 AM EST

Does anybody else see the parallels to Syria here?

“There exists a very fine line between patriotism and terrorism.”-Danny Divine

  • 4 votes
#1.98 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:51 AM EST

Nannette-there are no "detention camps" and the poverty, apathy and fear are symptoms coming from the media puppets from both sides who answer to corporate dictates for ratings and more profit. Think for yourself and enjoy your family, friends and today. You make your own reality and the ingredients for that recipe are of your own choosing.

  • 7 votes
#1.99 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:51 AM EST

Had Obama not been President, MCcain would have signed NDAA into law and had no regrets. They certainly had none with the original Patriot's Act as it had been written and they wanted to make it permanent.

What these weekend american taliban members forget is that there are those of us that, although we don't agree with our government, we do support it in theory and just as with any other country that would try to occupy us, we would support our government one shot at a time until they are all gone as well.

  • 6 votes
#1.100 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:54 AM EST

Potok said...many individuals involved in patriot militias are not criminals

Yeah, the MAJORITY.

While I will not deny that there are extremist elements in the militia movement, the vast majority are patriotic Americans that want to stand watch over our freedoms-- which is exactly what militias are supposed to do, as defined and characterized by the discussions that took place during the founding of our nation (see the Federalist and anti-Federalist papers). Anyone itching for a civil war and plotting to kill innocent police officers are guilty of treason-- and most of the militias in this country would agree with that. This report is nothing more than a demonization of the majority militiamen for the actions of a tiny few-- the article, for example, notes that there are "1274 this year" yet only "Two militia groups have made headlines in recent years for allegedly hatching violent plots." Huh... So what about the other 1272? There's probably a subset of them that are violent extremists, but the majority are not. This article is out to lambast an entire demographic of Americans who know their history, are involved in politics and in the ongoing defense of this nation should the unthinkable happen (a civil war, a foreign invasion). These events are unlikely, but that doesn't mean that there aren't people who will prepare for the worst-- in past days they would have been called pragmatic. Now the liberal media has derided them as "extremists" or "fringe elements" with the not-so-subtle suggestion that anyone who actively participates in a militia is a domestic terrorist. As someone who knows a few people in a militia, I can tell you that they are not warmongers (they want us out of Afghanistan, for example), they do NOT advocate violence except as a last resort, they spend the majority of their "training" preparing for natural disasters and their response to floods, tornadoes, etc., they do NOT believe that if Obama is reelected the US will fall into chaos and disorder (one of them voted for Obama, though he says he won't again), and they certainly aren't planning to bomb anyone, kill any police officers or otherwise cause any social mischief. They consider themselves "emergency auxiliary" in the unlikely event that local authorities are incapable of maintaining order or (even more unlikely) that the local authorities begin implementing a gestapo style disarmament and collection of any segment of the populace. These people just want to be prepared for the absolute worst possible scenario, they aren't out looking to create it. But go ahead, cry out in collective anguish and what horrible people these Militiamen are. Deride the "right-wing" for their "Taliban." Make light of the fact that our rights have been vastly eroded by the Patriot Acts and other presidential orders and ignore the fact that the federal government has been expanding its scope and power for the last 3-4 decades. Ignore the fact that you can now be detained indefinitely without trial under suspicion of terrorism/sedition -- pretend that a civilian defense of your rights is not needed. Just trust nanny government to watch over you... there's a good little lamb...

I for one am glad that these groups exist-- and more importantly, that they exist in greater numbers than before. Yes, the FBI should take notice when these groups veer into obvious plots of violence, unprovoked-- but lest you "left-wingers" forget, it was your own King of Camelot, Mr. John F. Kennedy, who said:

"Today we need a nation of minute men; citizens who are not only prepared to take up arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as a basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."

It's important to maintain a civilian defense of your freedom. Anyone who thinks otherwise has a poor grasp of history.

  • 16 votes
#1.101 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:58 AM EST

StrengthInNumbers: How do you think Russia turned into USSR? It was by a massive revolution of the people. Because they had had enough of privation at the hands of a small minority of obscenely wealthy individuals.

Easy. Just like Hitler or Saddam Hussein, or just about any other dictator got into power. Intimidation and convincing the masses to drink from the socialism/communist kool-aid. And look where it got them. An overly oppressive, totalitarian government that tolerated absolutely no dissenting opinions, no independent thought that wasn't in sync with the party line, no economic freedoms - in fact no freedoms at all, lack of basic consumer goods (toilet paper, food, etc), State controlled media telling you what they wanted you to know, an elite ruling class that said 'do as I say, not as I do' with anyone who didn't agree with them disappearing, never to be seen again. Yeah, really worked out well for the common people... especially in the USSR. Why do you think that 'empire' fell? Idiot...

We as Americans have nobody to blame but ourselves for the outsourcing of blue collar American jobs. Once Americans decided to save money by buying cheaper consumer goods imported from other countries... once we as Americans bought into the get rich quick schemes perpetuated by ambulance chasing shysters impersonating legitimate lawyers... once we as Americans sat on juries and awarded ridiculous settlements for frivilous lawsuites just so we could 'stick it to the big guy'... once we as Americans in the name of compassion allowed an entire class of and multiple generations of citizens to leech off the producers in this country instead of encouraging them to be responsible for themselves and become producers... once we as Americans decided to keep sending the same shmucks to Washington DC who spend OUR money like it was water, make laws only to exempt themselves from those same laws, and are more worried about getting pork for their district so they can get re-elected instead of doing what was fiscally responsible for the country... (I could go on and on and on) we were doomed. My brother owns a company that recently moved it's corporate headquarters and production to Mexico. Why? Because despite all the warnings posted on the heavy equipment they made... despite all the safety guards and safety switches put on said equipment... despite a 200 page operations manual and 12 hour on site hands on training... workers would by-pass the safety guards and switches, get hurt because of these unauthorized modifications, then sue his company for liability. The legal fees to defend themselves, and the resulting insurance rates, combined with ever increasing corporate taxation made it no longer fiscally viable to keep the company in the States. Good luck with your liability lawsuites in Mexico...

  • 6 votes
#1.102 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:59 AM EST

How may of you guys are high like the guy in the ditch up above?

These are just right-wingers. The came up under Clinton, drew down under Bush and are back up under Obama. These guys have their own "reality" of whose fault everything is--it's always the socialist or the government. On the face of it it's ridiculous, as Strength in Numbers correctly points out. It's FAITH that it has to be the lefties are out to get them. Not that the lefties have their own fears of demons--these militias are mostly in theri own bubble. They're not taking over anything. The worst we can fear from them is Murrah building terrorism. Bad enough I agree, but don't give them more power than they have. Someone said it above--if push comes to shove, country is not going go with them when they try to claim their Rheichstagg moment.

  • 11 votes
#1.103 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:02 AM EST

If anything should have ignited the crazy militia people in this country it should have been the raping of our country by GW Bush and Cheney. The real war mongers who trashed our economy and made piles of money and left us sitting in a giant pile of crap for someone else (someone named Obama) to clean it up.

These religious crackheads criticize Obama yet, do you think they will give up their social security, disability etc? This group along with the Teaparty are the biggest hypocrites I have ever witnessed. They call Obama a socialist yet take part in every government program there is.

Who do they want in office? The freak farm Republicans and Tea party taking away women's rights and shoving their religious B.S. down our throats?

Look out people. These lunatics are crazy.

  • 17 votes
#1.104 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:04 AM EST

Our country is a Democratic Republic, meaning a rule of the majority. It was NEVER a Democracy...

Um, not quite.

The United States of America is a Constitutional Republic. And that does NOT mean "a rule of the majority". In fact, the whole idea of a Constitutional Republic is to protect the minority from majority/mob mentality when it comes to the civil rights and liberties of the minority or individual. You are correct in saying that it was never a "democracy" -- because that would mean flat-out "majority rules"...

  • 10 votes
#1.105 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:06 AM EST

JoeMike404- That is paranoia in your words. US corporations watch you and track you far, far, far more than the US govt does. Just the other day there was an article here about corporations asking for us name and passwords to your Facebook accounts before they would consider you for a job. Companies try to get away with tactics like that and you better hope that there are 'liberal' organizations like the ACLU around to make sure that the government is made aware and puts a stop to it. Someone said it better above, but it's the runaway greed of US corporations that hurts us in the long run.

Stonedog... No one is forced to resort to crime. That's always a decision and you can't blame that on the government.

  • 8 votes
#1.106 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:07 AM EST
Comment author avatarDMorganExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Domestic terrorism is going to be our biggest security threat over the next decade. We don't need to worry as much about Iran, North Korea, or even groups in the Middle East if we have groups within our borders already...

I've said this before, myself. And, like the members of the KKK, most of these people you are referring to can be found in any number of churches, thumping their BuyBulls, right before they head out to cirlce-jerk with their militia buddies.

the worst thing that ever happened to mankind was religion and the need for people to create gods to believe in. It's the ultimate in mindlessness and hate.

truth be told -- most of the hate groups in this country are christian right-wingers, and most of their hatred stems from the inane, ridiculous dogma of the BuyBull and christianity.

  • 9 votes
#1.107 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:14 AM EST

I-Stevo, do you really think our government is oppressing our citizenry like the Nazi's in Germany, or the Soviets? Are you serious? I hope you are not because reality calls. We are not oppressed in any way, depite what the wingers are peddling. What aren't you free to do?

Nobody to blame but ourselves is wrong. Nobody voted to have the products we buy made in foreign countries. The people who OWN the COMPANIES that make the stuff figured out they would MAKE MORE MONEY if they made the stuff overseas. We went along for the ride while our neighbors slowly got "downsized." Then, the "cheap" foreign products were the only things that we could afford. It wasn't a choice we would have knowingly made. The fact that it has taken 30-40 years is the only way this could happen.

  • 10 votes
#1.108 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:15 AM EST

Hah! Governments have always been enemies of the people with their boot on our necks. That's the reason for the first and second amendments. In fact the entire bill of rights was designed to try to keep the government, somewhat, in check.

There are probably some militias that are not excessively radical, but I am not a joiner. It's true that there is strength in numbers but I stand alone and am not a danger to anyone.

  • 5 votes
#1.109 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:23 AM EST

From Romans:

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man [e.g. like the ego of "self"]—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.

And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of [spiritual] death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.

  • 4 votes
#1.110 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:27 AM EST

DMorgan, Have you seen "The Invention of Lying" Really funny movie and hits what you say about the invention of religion exactly (lying about a big invisible man in the sky who controls everything).

  • 5 votes
#1.111 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:29 AM EST

I challenge you to find a single period in the history of the US where people like you didn't claim that the US government wasn't moving in the wrong direction. Every single generation is beset by people who pine for the 'the good ole days'. Let me make it perfectly clear... There never was such a thing.

Could that be because Government is always moving in the wrong direction? From it's inception it's been moving in the direction of getting larger and larger, essentially moving away from being small and limited.

The rise in the number of these militias is better seen as an indicator of how poor our education system is that it produced such a large number of people that ant be anything but simple minded reactionaries in manner of thinking akin to a palinesque black and white world view.

I concur, our liberal education system is poor but I'd point to the rise in the number of food stamp recipients as an indicator for just how poor our education system is first.

  • 2 votes
#1.112 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:39 AM EST

Terrorists. Plain and simple. We have an election process. If you don't like the currently elected, wait and vote them out. If you can't vote them out, and you can't live with the decision that majority made, then you need to leave.

A militia should only be necessary if the government takes away your right to vote them out (Russia).

  • 7 votes
#1.113 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:39 AM EST

I want government to help not hinder, I want government to show us the path not make it, I want government to be a leader not a follower but what these stupid militia don't understand is it's not the government who is eroding our freedom. It's not the government who is becoming socialist.

It is the powerful individuals and the powerful corporations who tell our elected officials which way the wind blows or how many times to fart a day. Everything the government was back then is no longer true today. Money = Power = Dictate/Write policies that favor Money and Power.

When all logic fails - follow the money. Example

Oil Companies hate electric cars why because oil will no long be needed thus reducing oil companies CEO's pay, Shareholders Dividends and the future of their money sources. If I was a oil company or billionaire shareholder I would spend some of my billions to keep it going wouldn't you. Thus our present day law of United Citizens = Corporations are people too. Corporations can now run unlimited ads against anyone who will not follow their orders.

There has always been racism in this country but now the rich are willing to jen up as much racial hatred as possible to insure anyone that does not look and think like them never get into the Presidents office again.

But this is the kicker no matter how much money you have you can't control the birth rate by which the minority for the first time has produced more children than whites in 2010 with in a few years whites will be the minority across the board until 2055. That will make a 40 year period in which whites vote may not matter in any election. Again with this in mind that means some billionaire and billion dollar corporation will lose money and power. They see the numbers as I do. Under estimating any rules of law because they will make the law to their liking. If know one is there to check them can you blame them? NO you would do the same or at least most of you would.

Take the Koch Brothers, in order to write policies they are systematically developing think tanks or taking them over completely- CITO Institute is an educational research institute - for example is resisting this, but for how long? It seems one of there goals is to re-educate or shape education for their beliefs and goals. Leading back to keeping money and power.

Us old white men will pass and hopefully the next generation will not have greed ways about them.

God bless you and God bless the United States of America.

  • 7 votes
#1.115 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:54 AM EST

Ahhhh, another lib propoganda article...I love it!

The center also reports a steady rise in the number of hate groups in America — from 604 in 2000, to more than 1,000 last year. Those include anti-gay groups, anti-Muslim groups, black separatists and "Christian Identity" groups, which hold racist and anti-Semitic views that overlap with neo-Nazi beliefs.

I seem to recall a pretty big hate movement in the OWS crowd. Jewish bankers, investors, corporations, all conservatives, all in their cross hairs. When you have a President that operates on division and hate, this is what you get.

  • 7 votes
#1.116 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:54 AM EST

What you don't understand is that these hate groups have nothing to do with Republican views these groups are Democrat groups. I understand that you would like to push it on your Republican counter parts but these groups all hold Democrat and socialist views. Look it up and you will see that the Skinhead movement White Supremacists; socialist; Democrats, black panther party; black separatist; Democrats, KKK White Supremacists; Democrats. I know you wish it was the other way but those are not the facts these are.

  • 2 votes
#1.117 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:00 AM EST

I feel inclined to point out that the left has their own share of militant groups-- though they rarely use the term militia to describe themselves. There's any number of radical race groups (black panthers, la raza), violent environmentalists (Earth Liberation Front, etc) and radical feminists-- all of which are armed and have committed violent bombings, assaults and other actions against people in authority. So just remember that the door swings both ways, oh ye hypocritical liberals.

  • 9 votes
#1.118 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:07 AM EST

It's nice to see the left has its own conspiracy theories. As usual, guns in the hands of the people frighten the left wingers very much because they see it as a threat to their socialistic/progressive agenda, so they see militias behind every tree.

One can be absolutely certain that they will employ every opportunity to villify guns and the people that possess them.

Damn that 2nd amendment.

  • 8 votes
#1.119 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:11 AM EST

Fox News = Propaganda Machine = Misinformation = Get 50 million people to believe what you are saying even if it is a lie. Example Electric cars are bad. WOW really. Then in the same program blame the high gas prices on President Obama. The logic would be more American buy more electric cars to reduce the demand for oil thus lowering the price. NOT Fox Noise they want both for political gain. Money = Power.

The only law to stop people from voting is nothing. History has proven that.

  • 9 votes
#1.120 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:12 AM EST

Why would you need a gun - To protect yourself - Hunt - Kill people who disagree with you "see overseas revolts"

  • 1 vote
#1.121 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:14 AM EST

Example Electric cars are bad

They go 30 miles on a 12 hour charge. They cost what, 60k? Whats not to love right? hehe

  • 2 votes
#1.122 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:15 AM EST

It's the government and politicians fault. Everything is pit one group of Americans against another group everybody yells and nobody listens. That jump doesn't include people like me who won't arm to the teeth and actively attack. But I feel disenfranchized in this country. There is more hatred towards my group since anytime since the turn of the last century. Then we were mostly immigrants now we are third and fourth generation Americans and we won't go hide in our neighborhoods and churches. We will stand here and say bring it on. This group on group hatred is dangerous and it is fostered by the policies of our government.

  • 3 votes
#1.123 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:17 AM EST

Tea Tarded is exactly the kind of rational level headed American who can sit down with other normal people and peacefully resolve differences and achieve national unity.

Who is the president who has the leadership, education, charisma and charm to calm all these inflammatory remarks.

It certainly isn't Obama. He has demonstrated that he can not even get along with members of his own party.

Of the 43 million registered democrats, Obama is the best they have to offer after seeing what he has done in the last three years? At least the Republicans are having a nasty mud slinging festival, getting everything out in the open. The democrats are tied to Obama like a dog can be chained to a tree.

    #1.124 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:20 AM EST

    The logic would be more American buy more electric cars to reduce the demand for oil thus lowering the price. NOT Fox Noise they want both for political gain. Money = Power.

    Naaaa, here is the fix right here!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4L29yBMay5o&feature=player_embedded

      #1.125 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:22 AM EST

      rightwing terrorists, that all they are. FACT; more americans were killed on american soil by rightwing american terrorists than by foriegn terrorists before 911. when clinton was president during the nineties we went through the same thing with the rise of the whitewing christian moral minority trying to push its values on the majority, which resulted in the killing of innocent american men women and children. too many innocent children. alls it takes is one of these terrorists withthe same mentality as the norway killer, to fire the first shot. these people are not rational thinkers. and bill they have everything to do with the rightwing republicans. there is no difference between the rightwing and the republicans, they have merged as one and the same.

      • 2 votes
      #1.126 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:33 AM EST

      Kornfed/Bill/Nancy: Nice try all, but let's stop pretending this is about anything as lofty as political movements or policy failures. These bottom-dwellers are about what they've always been about: uncomplicated, simple-minded hate and fear. No matter who is in the White House, what energy, education or foreign policies you have or don't have, you'll have these would-be anarchists waiting to crawl out from under their rocks. Decent people don't need to be looking for excuses to blame their existence on democracy and decent Americans don't need to fear free speech as some kind of weakness, or a President in office you didn't vote for as "creating divisions". Let them whine and pine for an America that never existed--an all-white land without laws, standards or national purpose or common decency. They will continue to be what they've always been...irrelevant outsiders who will never have a real role in this country they hate so much. Keep them out in the open...they disintegrate in sunlight.

      • 5 votes
      #1.127 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:33 AM EST

      Funny how hate groups like the Black Muslims, CAIR and Media Matters never seem to get any notice from these progressive puritans. I guess they are employing your "weapons of choice" in spewing their hate.

      I also note the tons of "collapsed" (i.e. censored) comments by the guardians of political correctness here with the MSM. I have some news for them: they are a dying form of media. We know your game and we're not buying it any more.

      • 6 votes
      #1.128 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:51 AM EST

      I never even though about joining one of these groups until reading about it on this post. Thanks. And they even leave a web address to join in or to at least get info. I don't trust the gov't so groups like these are needed.

      • 6 votes
      #1.129 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:52 AM EST

      These pigs are not picking up arms to protect against the "government."

      They are picking up arms to fight against AMERICANS.

      Gay Americans.

      African-Americans.

      Hispanic- Americans.

      Muslim-Americans.

      Liberal Americans.

      Female Americans.

      Non Evangelical Americans.

      Jewish Americans.

      Birth control using Americans.

      Clean air and water loving Americans.

      Non White Male Supremacist AMERICANS.

      They're picking up arms against YOU!

      The Confederates are raising their ugly heads again.

      • 8 votes
      #1.130 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:55 AM EST

      LogicRequired:

      ...."Is playing army on the weekends illegal?"...

      I got this one.

      Hey, LogicRequired!

      They're Muslims.

      (Watch him squirm)

      Have a nice day.

      • 3 votes
      #1.131 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:01 PM EST

      This is yet another "bogus article" put up by MSNBC.

      It falsely claims anyone/group who disagrees with the Obama Regime agenda, it magically deemed by them as a hate-group.

      That is utterly foolish, as well as anti-First Amendment.

      Besides the "Southern Poverty Law Center" was deemed a racist hate group itself, and has been classified as one for the past several years.

      So why would anyone consider anything they claim? Come on..........!

      • 8 votes
      #1.132 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:01 PM EST

      army-3854635

      Terrorists. Plain and simple. We have an election process. If you don't like the currently elected, wait and vote them out. If you can't vote them out, and you can't live with the decision that majority made, then you need to leave.

      A militia should only be necessary if the government takes away your right to vote them out (Russia).

      Our elections are rigged. It's already been proven by Iowa, declared Mittens the winner, then weeks afterwards changed their minds and said it was actually Frothy, this may have easily affected the votes in several states during that time. Then in Maine, the head of the GOP there was blatantly denying the plain and simple truth that Ron Paul won the state, and admitted he will not allow the true results to even count, because they will show that he won. It's suspected that Nevada had heavy fraud as well, but nothing blatant can be proven there yet.

      The plain and simple truth is, our government is bought and paid for and NOW is the time for a second revolution. They won't allow this revolution to be peaceful, by allowing the true voice of the people, for the people, Ron Paul to win through fair demcratic elections, so they only leave us one choice, and that is to enact OUR 2nd Ammendment rights, to rise up and take our country back!

      • 9 votes
      #1.133 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:06 PM EST

      And your Avatar has to do with what? Dumb-dee-dumb-dumb

      Ha ha ha ha...nice try there Obama Regime guy! Spoken like the artical says they do, hee hee.

      • 3 votes
      #1.134 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:29 PM EST

      Well , well. It seems that once again the Liberal Left leaning media and this Administration are at once again. It also is very well apparent from a lot of the posts that their tactic once again works well. Fear Mongering! Yes that is all this Administration and the Media have done since Obama took office. We all can look back at all the promises the First African American Presidential Candidate promised. He first off promised to be a President to all. Well folks for those of you who may have short term memory loss. It was President Obama's own words that caused the first schism's of division in this country. When he basically told the Republican Minority Congress at that time to get to the back of the bus and enjoy the ride. Wow, that was a great first hand at bringing unity to an already divided nation.

      Then that was not the beginning of it. Lets see how many are so short of memory. Then the Democratically Controlled Congress began to ram legislation after legislation down the throats of those who opposed them without any concern for opposition input. No just sit down and shut up. Look at the complete BS Media photo shoot they gave us when he was trying to make it look like he was working with all of us on the Health Care Bill. Lets see the jury is still out on the Constitutionality of that bill. Yet still memory serves me correct the majority of Americans where mad that Congress had the audacity to just shove something down our throat. It was not so much about the Health Care law as to how it was presented and brought forward to us.

      So yes this President has shown an utter disdain for our Constitution by side stepping the Legislative Branch in appointing non confirmed Czars. Now lets face it people most of us who grew up during the boogie man days of Communist Russia, heard all about those Czars of Russia. So of course we have a bad feeling about the label used. Then this President appoints people during Congressional recess knowing these people where not going to be confirmed. Then getting on National TV and literally thumbing Congress in the Eye. So yes he has also feed fuel to this Fire.

      We have been told time after time that if we don't do this then this will happen. So because people are reacting to this by exercising their free rights to bear arms. Then also the Constitution also gives us the Right to form People Militia's. Yes a lot of people where comfortable with then President Bush. Its interesting that the Left likes to point out the Encroachment of Freedoms that the Bush Presidency brought on us with the Patriot Act. Heck now they don't even need a warrant to enter your home. All they have to do is label you a terrorist. So yes people are scared. There is only one solution for this. That is if this President begins to reign in his appetite for power. To begin to try and be a President to all the People of the US.

      This President had and in my opinion still has the time to make a lot of reparations. Just by the fact that he is of not just African American descent, but also Caucasian. He could use this to his advantage by bringing healing to the races and anger that still is deep seated in this nation between the African American and the White race in this nation, he could bring reconciliation rather than more hate. Yet what has happened is the opposite. More and more racial division has occurred in this country. So all of this has fueled these movements. When people are feeling uncomfortable they tend to do things they would not ordinarily do to get their comfort level back.

      So yes people are scared and this President has done very little to comfort the nation. He has failed as a President and a leader. Oh yeah I am going to get flamed by alot who think he can do no wrong. Yet from day one of his Presidency he showed me he was not a Real Leader. When he kept on blaming Bush and how he continues to Blame Bush and now the Repubican Congress. I keep waiting to see when anything is going to be his fault.

      • 6 votes
      #1.135 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:32 PM EST

      You people are a joke. If your opinion is based in one party or the other, you are already too brain washed to matter.One party is as bad as the other and both are as anti-American as the other. They polarization is by design. If the people are arguing with each other, few o us are watching them. They are all crooks, they all put forward illegal agenda's. It's all about power and money for them.

      I saw the question asked if the militias were growing just in "certain" states. According to the SPLC, if it is to be believed, the largest growth has occurred in California, Oregon, Washington state, Illinois, and New York state. Given the far left nature of these states, it makes one wonder, why?

      I keep seeing the "all White" statement made. Really, taken a role of militia lately? Most are comprised of middle class working people, Male, female, white, black, American Natives. But the all white charge helps those of a certain political position falsely imply racism or supremacy. Akin to the practice of demonizing guns, they do this, they do that, as if a gun can act on it's own.

      "Those who beat their guns into plows, Will plow for those who do not". Thomas Jefferson.

      "A government large enough to give you all that you need, Is large enough to take all that you have". Benjamin Franklin".

      Okay leftist sensors, collapse this comment too. We all know what category the MSN moderators fall into. Just calling them as I see them.

      • 8 votes
      #1.136 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:34 PM EST

      woodlawn: It certainly isn't Obama. He has demonstrated that he can not even get along with members of his own party.

      I guess you (like so many others) have been mistaking all the GOP primary fights and the GOP debates as a love fest? jesus h nipple -- i've never see so much hate in one place as you get with a room full of republicans. and their hate for each other burns like a supernova...

      • 5 votes
      #1.137 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:37 PM EST

      Wow,
      I haven't read a comment on here that isn't extreme, in either direction Left or Right!!!! I like reading all the comments that try and "spew" facts. None of them accurate, some are down right lies (again on both sides Left and Right). Settle down everyone!!! Quit being so judgemental and extreme towards your neighbors!!! as for the article, who cares what these people are doing as long as they aren't breaking federal or local laws. They don't affect me, and probably not a single one of you (even tho some of you will claim they do).

      • 2 votes
      #1.138 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:37 PM EST

      @ jollyoldsoul1

      "...In the last few months 16 people have been shot and killed, several of them children under 12 and elderly. Whats the difference between " Militia" And "Street Gangs"..."

      Well, who did the killing, the militia or street gangs? There is the difference.

      • 2 votes
      #1.139 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:39 PM EST

      I keep seeing the "all White" statement made. Really, taken a role of militia lately? Most are comprised of middle class working people, Male, female, white, black, American Natives........................................have you taken a poll? don't think so, show us all the non-whites in these militias. you stateing otherwisedoes not make it so.

      • 2 votes
      #1.140 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:42 PM EST

      These extreme militia groups aren't a representation of mainstream conservatives no more than Hitler is President mentor (hopefully anyway). But they do represent a feeling of being threatened by a federal government that is increasingly becoming more invasive and controlling with a constant focus on a " fundamental change of America" according to Obama's personal ideology.

      No President has been so politically divisive and fiscally irresponsible as President Obama and a Congress hell bent on putting our nation on a road to a disastrous financial and economic collapse. They are the problem along with their corporate master$ who pull their puppet strings. Our current national debt which is still climbing is the only proof needed.

      • 1 vote
      #1.142 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:50 PM EST

      Is it the economy that is doing this or is it just us doing it to ourselves? Look at TV. Dozens of shows like Doomsday Prepers , Son of a Guns, 48 hours, Walking Dead, all ten CSI shows, all 10 law and orders, and the scare tactics of today's 24 hour news cycle. I am not just talking about Fox News but all of them. They have convinced people that you are never safe. Look at that Nancy Grace broad. Stranger abduction of children does happen. And even though it happens somewhere almost everyday it is still a rare event. Your odds that your child will be grabbed are lottery win small. If not smaller. Grace acts like a new kid is abducted a 100 times a day. Are you really that much safer if you have 80 guns and three years worth of supplies in your house like people do on Doomsday Prepers? It all reminds me of a old Twilight Zone episode. One of those Hutaree idiots lived two blocks away from me for years. He was one of our neighborhood strange behavior nuts. Every neighborhood has a couple. We let a geriatric "B" movie actor convince us that our government is not just the problem but the enemy. Just like our northern neighbors in Canada we are the most free people in the world. Unlike them we live in fear of everything. They have legalized gun ownership up there just like us. What they don't have is idiots with 60 guns and 5 footlockers of ammo in their basement. We have fallen victim to the Washington/Jefferson myth that they were freedom loving patriots when they were actually slave owning tyrants. Buying and selling people for their own economic gain. These conspiracy nuts veer from "our government is incompetent and incapable of doing anything" to "our government is a all controlling malevolent entity controlling our every waking second" and back in a second. Maybe one is true but both cannot be.

      • 2 votes
      #1.143 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:51 PM EST

      You can fall for this media hype if you want but its not all entirely true! if you think minorities are not armed and a immediate danger then think again its just that they address themselves as gangs and operate openly in our cities these so called militias have not shown the aggression that the gangs are constantly showing, the truth is these mindless liberal agencies want to bring those militia groups down but don't bother the gangs or report on their agendas, they only expose the white militias that have done very little in the way of violence." Keep the McVay conspiracy out of the picture that is a whole different story". for the most part these militias have been around as long (longer) then we have been a nation and they are the check valve that keeps the government in check, its only natural that the government wants to remove them so they can take over completely, most of them will never raise a hand against the American people, but the government will, and going after them is what will fuel the fire. all we have is accusations at this point and fabricated BS. these people just want to keep their rights. when was the last time you saw a armed group of militia driving down the road machine gunning people at random on the streets, enough of the stereo typing of these organizations its more hype then fact. I'm staying neutral on this issue. Remember Ruby ridge and Waco? who were the Villeins? we will never know the truth about Waco only that it got way out of hand, and Ruby ridge never should have happened. I'm not standing up for David Karish, but I'm also not supporting the government on their handling of the situation, I have noticed that these things always happen when we have Democrats in office, and they generate the fear of our losing our constitutional rights.

      • 2 votes
      #1.144 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:54 PM EST

      Solutions539 - The people revolting in Syria have guns as well. So did the people in Libya. As you can see from those examples, no number of citizens with guns would stop an army with training, bigger guns, etc from enforcing its will. The rebellion is Libya was successful only with the outside intervention of a much larger army. What would stop a government from enforcing its will militarily would be an army of unwilling soldiers, so your money is better spent educating your soldiers to respect the will of the people and the sanctity of life.

      But it is a time honored fallacy to believe that the second amendment is somehow a buffer against an oppressive government.

        #1.145 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:09 PM EST

        Sovereign citizens?

        Sounds to me like The New World Order Oligarchy has found their suckers.

        You do realize individual sovereignty is one of the foundations of the founding of our country, right? It's THE foundation of Civil Disobedience, ala Gandhi and MLKjr, you know that right? You do realize that you can't have popular sovereignty without individuals first voluntarily giving over their sovereignty first, right?

        Obviously you don't. You're just a conspiracy theorist. Good job for not knowing jack about your own country, the Enlightenment, or Civil Disobedience.

        All individuals are sovereign, the governments of the world (if they are compulsory states) can only aggress gainst that sovereignty.

        If you have the mental and physical ability to govern yourself, then you have the right to govern yourself. If you harm no others or their properties in governing yourself, then LOGICALLY all external compulsory government is tyranny.

        But it is a time honored fallacy to believe that the second amendment is somehow a buffer against an oppressive government.

        You might want to stfu and read the founders...they quite explicitly said the 2nd Amendment wasn't so much for hunting, self defense, or to stop foreign invasion as it was to overthrow a tyrannical DOMESTIC government (or more directly, to defend against a domestic government's tyranny).

        This isn't debatable...go read and stop your ignorance.

        • 2 votes
        #1.146 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:23 PM EST

        Again its obvious that it doesnt take much to stir up the masses. An article stating that there are 1200+ Militias operating in the United States is taken as fact without verification. And reading some of the posts here confirms that there are a few here that are in dire need of formal education.

        The poster rigth above this one is an excellent example:

        D Buck-2239568

        You can fall for this media hype if you want but its not all entirely true! if you think minorities are not armed and a immediate danger then think again its just that they address themselves as gangs and operate openly in our cities these so called militias have not shown the aggression that the gangs are constantly showing, the truth is these mindless liberal agencies want to bring those militia groups down but don't bother the gangs or report on their agendas, they only expose the white militias that have done very little in the way of violence."

        Nice way to try and avert the direction of the article. Minoritites you say? What you mean is non-WASP which makes you the minority in the U.S. These militias are made up of all ethnicities sharing a like minded ideaology. Only the media wants you to think that they are all white males with a hate agenda, when in fact they view the Federal Government as the enemy.

        I think the funniest post that I've read so far is from:

        keck yes. when the new black panther party states they "need to kill some crackers, and some cracker babies" you pretty much know they will kill them, as you stated, stand and deliver.

        It has NOTHING to do with the article, and clearly shows how the "Oh yeah well what about this" crowd will always show up. Kind of like showing up to play football dressed for ballet...

        • 1 vote
        #1.147 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:24 PM EST

        Funny how these people willing to fight for freedom and the constitution are being marked as terrorists. The real terrorists are those who take away citizens' rights. The terrorists are the ones who bust into people's houses armed to the teeth in tactical gear in the middle of the night because someone grew some plants. They are the religious freaks who scare their children with the thought that everything they do is sinful and God is watching. The terrorists are the bankers and stock brokers who literally destroy families. They are those who use fear to get what they want. The are the prison and military/industrial complexes. They are the threat of war because politicians don't respect other peoples' sovereignty and right to self determination. The terrorists are the judges who convict the innocent and uphold unconstitutional laws and practices. Terrorism is an authoritarian system in which no amount of logic or reason can persuade the authority. Terrorism is being controlled by immoral greedy idiots. It is giving away half of what you make for things you disagree with in the first place. Terrorists are the ones who lie and spread propoganda. They make you fear your neighbor. Terrorists are the journalists who intentionally spread fear. (Reefer madness, crazy militia men, Iraq has WMD's)

        If you do the research, these sovereign citizens have a very strong legal argument as well as having common sense on their side. They are correct that when the federal government breaks its contract with the people, it no longer has a legitimate claim to power. Individuals are not the only ones who see it this way. Almost half of our states have likewise declared sovereignty.

        This is mostly due to the Federal government using its right to regulate interstate commerce. The problem is, the feds consider all commerce as being inherently tied to interstate commerce and therefore part of it. This argument was once used to prohibit marijuana. Of course that was when they had to be sneaky since everyone at that time knew it was unconstitutional to regulate the cannabis plant in this way. Before this trick they had devised a scheme where one needed to take their crop to D.C. to purchase a tax stamp, except it was ilegal to bring cannabis into DC. The federal government often relies on intentional misinterpretation of the law.It was even recently decided in court that if Police forcefully enter your home accidently while serving a warrant, you have no right to resist them.

          #1.148 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:24 PM EST

          There are many posters here who will have a field day with my post and I say have at it folks for you will be the ones with egg on your face when all prophecy is fulfilled and becomes your reality.

          I am not worried or concerned and fear no person or government. The rantings and ravings of a world that has lost sight of their savior is all that is currently happening.

          Religions aside, everything currently happening has been foretold and prophesied for literally thousands of years. All of you blind, deaf, dumb, self-centered, self-serving, humanistic, idol-worshiping, hateful, racist, house-divided, condemning people cannot see the truth staring you in the face. For the first time in the history of this world more people believe there is no God than believe one exists. Most believe the greatest lie ever told, you are your own god and the real one is just a faerie tale in the sky.

          As any woman who has ever given birth can tell you labor begins with a twitch and over time develops into a very real, agonizing pain. The pain increases to a level that is for most almost unbearable. It is at the point of almost unbearable pain the actual birth takes place and suddenly the gift of new life lies before you and the great pain is gone. So shall it be for all mankind. The twitch at the beginning of labor for mankind has commenced. Please be aware it is going to get worse, the pains will become more intense, will be longer in duration with shorter time spans between each pain. But then will be born the gift of new life for mankind and all of those who have kept the faith.

          You are free to chose between the lie or the truth, but to be sure with the lie comes death and with the truth comes real life, liberty, and freedom. When it does all comes to pass, and it will, please remember you made fun of me, ridiculed me, and called me insane. But also remember I, along with the faithful, was right on the money.

          Be excellent to each other, peace out.

          • 2 votes
          #1.149 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:36 PM EST

          The spike in these groups can be attributed to a combination of factors, including the sluggish economy, radical propaganda and anxiety over the election of a black president, Potok said.

          What a load of BS!!! First off, he's not a "black" president, more acurrately he is a mixed race president, but don't let the facts get in the way. You liberals never do anyway. However, that is not the point.

          In my opinion, the main reason for any increase in militia groups is due to the continued talk of "revolution" that I see on these Newsvine blogs and elsewhere. Those comments have mostly come from self-identified liberals and OWS types. Any right thinking person who reads these comments knows to take them as a warning/threat to the principles that made this country great! I won't stand for it and I know damn good and well that I am not alone in that thought!

          • 1 vote
          #1.150 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:44 PM EST

          Not restoring many comments. Derails.

          • 2 votes
          #1.151 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:49 PM EST

          The propaganda spinners are having a happy little lunch of $hit sandwiches.. Everyone who does not agree with their democrat or republican views is bad and the word Militia has been spun into uneducated white bible kissing murderers.. Have we had a small amount of violent acts here at home?, why yes.. Is it even remotely close to the small countries levels of hate violence?, heck no.. Inner city gangs are armed and organized mostly minority groups who could surely be classified as militant criminal Militias.. Our enemy is corporate greed plain and simple.. Big oil derailed electric cars with its $$$$.. The battery technology that would make electric cars 250 mile per charge was bought up by them never to be seen.. The population of the world is now manipulated by the money movers purely for their profit and entertainment.. 99% of the groups they call militia are harmless weekend warriors preparing for the event of a lawless breakdown of our society from natural or economic disaster..That 1% is a few hundred people who are squish heads and that's not a bad percentage compared to the general population.. Same spin they put on the people protesting the corporate/government machine.. Trying to make Militia and preppers look evil or nutty is just more of the same fear mongering BS..

            #1.152 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:54 PM EST

            What a cluster**** of a thread. A few things to remember people: 1. WE ARE ALL SOVEREIGN CITIZENS 2. THE UNITED STATES IS NOT A DEMOCRACY 3. THE UNITED STATES IS A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC

            • 2 votes
            #1.153 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:59 PM EST

            Many of these comments lead me to believe that some of you don’t see any changes with how the government is now and that they are at war with a “tactic”, that allows them to use force anywhere in the world against anyone (the same as a dictator can).

            Amongst the most important of which is the Patriot Act and NDAA which allow the President on his say so alone to execute, detain or torture American Citizens without evidence or trial, based solely on his say that “someone is a risk to National Security, and is tied to Al-Qaeda”. If you don’t need evidence and there’s no trial, you can’t legally fight an accusation by the President that you or anyone else is a terrorist.

            It is TREASONOUS to consolidate power this way. The Constitution is the very document that gave our government its powers. There is no POTUS, Congress or Courts without the Constitution. That’s not “buying into something that any educated person would reject” That’s what’s really happening.

            Sure things SEEM to balance out, but when this much power is in one persons hands then many of us are not willing to idly stand by waiting for the one time that power gets abused. To me you can’t be rebelling against your “country” if your countries government isn’t following the document that allowed its existence. To me fighting politically for the hearts and minds to return to the government of the Constitution is being a Patriot. If that makes me part of the Extremist Right to anyone, of course I think they’re the ones that are nuts.

            There are many of us that feel this way. We are understandably concerned as the Constitutional powers seem under constant challenge and attack, and the Bill of Rights is being shredded before our eyes.

            “United we stand, divided we fall”. Were supposed to be united by the Constitution, but when the people in power are attempting to destroy, usurp and re-interpret that document you have division. In my opinion there is little hope from a course of civil war if we don’t all unite under the banner of the Constitution. That may seem dramatic, but where else can it go if one group in power is re-writing the Constitution and the other is wanting it adhered to?

            EVERY Soldier, Law Enforcement person, Firefighter, and Politician swore and Oath to defend the Constitution from all enemies [sic -of the Constitution] both Foreign or Domestic. They didn’t swear to defend the country, the government, a person, not even We The People. When that precept is under attack you’d have to expect a political response to defend it against those that would see it ended.

            This is beyond simple socialism or theocracy, those are only the sheep’s clothing the real problem wears. This is a rising tyranny, and a subversion of the Constitution that IS happening.

            • 6 votes
            #1.154 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:01 PM EST

            ProIndividual... It is entirely debatable whether the Founders included the second amendment for the purposes of protecting citizens against the government. Some founders did support that notion and others merely sought to include it because of our weak army, our former reliance on militias, the will of the states to maintain their own power, etc. You can't simplify the point of the second amendment down that easiy then tell others to "STFU". Easy hard charger.

              #1.155 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:13 PM EST

              #1.90, #1.101, #1.136---great posts.

                #1.156 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:22 PM EST

                The SPLC is right on with It's reports. Many such groups contain a lot of younger discharged military folks too. Many of these vets seem to be so taken with militarism that they simply cannot meld themselves back into a civil society, therefore they invent a militaristic threat to supply animation to their delusions.

                  #1.157 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:58 PM EST

                  I support the Right of the People to possess and bear arms; to defend their homes, their families and themselves when NEEDED; to Peacefully protest against their own Government; and to rise up against Government WHEN ALL ELSE FAILS. The "Founding Fathers" of the U.S.A. guaranteed, in the document known as The Constitution of The United States of America, all of those Rights, and more, in the First and Second Amendments to that same document.

                  These home-grown "American Taliban" so-called "militias" are NOT the militia envisioned by George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, etc, etc, etc. These "militias" are nothing more than private armies, which the "Founding Fathers" spoke against. The Constitutional militia is comprised of "able-bodied" Citizens age 16-60, called up to serve in the militia to defend the United States of America and the individual and several States of the U.S.A. in times of war.

                  By the way, I am one the those "Pinko-Commie-Leftist-Liberal-Socialists" the members of these so-called "militia" hate so much. I also "happen" to own guns -- and am willing to use any of them to defend myself against any of these American Taliban so-called "militia" when they come to take MY Rights and Liberties away.

                  • 2 votes
                  #1.158 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:06 PM EST

                  ProIndividual... It is entirely debatable whether the Founders included the second amendment for the purposes of protecting citizens against the government.

                  Then quote the founders where they said it WASN'T.

                  Good luck.

                  I can quote them for years where they said it was the original intent. It's no more debatable than the existence of slavery at the founding. Please attempt to actually read them.

                  And BTW, many of the quotes I would write here are already done below in other comments by other posters.

                    #1.159 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:11 PM EST

                    Four Points Shy Of Genius
                    #1.154 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:01 PM EST
                    It is TREASONOUS....

                    The Constitution of the United States of America, Article 3, Section 3 states quite clearly that

                    "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
                    The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."

                    I think you should change your handle to Four Points Shy of Education.

                    • 1 vote
                    #1.160 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:29 PM EST

                    I'm sorry.

                    Have I been on another planet? Isn't this the planet with Teapublicans screaming about the "Government coming to take away" your rights and guns? Isn't this the place where the Right makes millionaires out of blathering buffoons who preach to their wide-eyed, paranoid and xenophobic audience to beware of the "evil" government because they're trying to ruin this country?

                    Am I wrong to point out that conservatives and their elected officials have been systematically banging the drum, yelling in support of those "patriots" who openly call for secessionism and civil war?

                    I must be mistaken. I could have sworn I heard that message being loudly promoted by the Right.

                    Now, all of a sudden, it's the OPPOSITE? Now, those crazy, dangerous militants practicing for war against the U.S. are just quaint, weekend enthusiasts? They're not the paranoid and zany idiots who swear they're being taken over by Sharia Law and Socialists?

                    These aren't the "Strict Constitutionalist," "Anti-Regulation" people that overlook the "Well Regulated" part of the "Well regulated militia" phrase in the Constitution? Really??

                    I'm sorry. My bad. Please beam me back to my home planet. You know -

                    The planet with video evidence of "Non racist" bigots spitting on Black congressmen. The planet with no evidence of that. The planet with NO evidence that our president is a Muslim/Socialist who is after your guns with plenty of evidence to support it.

                    That one.

                    Have a nice day.

                    • 3 votes
                    #1.161 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:39 PM EST

                    Four Points Shy Of Genius
                    #1.154 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:01 PM EST
                    It is TREASONOUS....

                    The Constitution of the United States of America, Article 3, Section 3 states quite clearly that

                    "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
                    The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."

                    I think you should change your handle to Four Points Shy of Education.

                    Interesting that you point out only one word to attempt a counter argument. Anyway...

                    You quoted:

                    "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them"

                    What is attacking the Constitution if not an Act of War?

                    P.S. Making abusive ad hominem attacks on my screenname doesn't do much to give credence
                    or validity to your poor argument on my word choice.

                    • 3 votes
                    #1.162 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:51 PM EST

                    Putting myself on double-secret probation for being a complete limpbag.

                    Not the first time!

                    "You won`t have Tard to kick around anymore!"

                      #1.163 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:56 PM EST

                      TeaFarters:

                      The President has no birth certificate, despite his birth certificate.

                      The President is a Muslim, despite his allegience to Rev Wright for all those years.

                      The President is ruining the economy, despite the turn around of the economy after G.W. Bush.

                      The President is a thug, despite his knack for diplomacy and protocol, like bowing.

                      The President is a Dictator that lacks leadership (one of the funnier ones).

                      The President is weak, despite being a ruthless thug from Chicago (another funny one).

                      The First Lady is trying to tell us what to do by promoting healthier eating, but Sarah Palin is protecting our freedoms by telling us we're all Christians.

                      The President is trying to force his beliefs on us by sitting down at the table with and compromising with Republicans.

                      Don't blame guns, they're "just tools." The militants aren't racist and dangerous - they're just white men in camouflage, practicing with tools to help them with their Black, Mexican, Homosexual Problem.

                      Warning: Beware of any claims from the right that they are in posession of common sense.

                      Have a nice day.

                      • 1 vote
                      #1.164 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:56 PM EST

                      Shut yer yap,

                      This is for you most of all. Its so like some who are liberal to use the tactic you just used. That is to reduce supposed claims to the ridiculous. I too can do the same. Lets just go the facts at hand. Here is a copy of the US Constitution for all to study. Since many here think they know what it says. Alot also have never even laid eyes on it. Yet many wonder why so many are joining these according to their own opinions " Right Wing Extremist Movements" which it too funny.

                      If someone shows an ounce of Patriotism, because they embrace the Founding Father's principles, and seem to feel threatened by our government. None of these groups would have zero traction. Yet also our Founding Fathers warned of what happens too when we become to apathetic. Like so many saying oh our government wouldn't do that to us. Well alot of Jews in Germany thought the same thing, along with Catholics, Gays, Blacks, Romanians, etc. during Nazi Germany.

                      History is what we are to learn from. If we don't learn from our Historic Failures we will be doomed to repeat them. I still believe in my Nation as a whole. Yet I also belonged at one time to a militia. Why? For one I felt it was my Patriotic duty to belong to a Militia. Ours was organized to operate with all State and Federal Law Enforcement in the event of Natural Disasters, or other issues with the state when it comes to man power needs in the arena of law enforcement. That is also the other reason our Founding Fathers told us to form these. Well look at the time they lived in. They did not have the Internet or the communications we have today. So yes the need for local citizen Militia's was even greater than. So there is a reason for them and they are not all about EXTREMISM or FEAR MONGERING. So read this Constitution and I hope you all enjoy. I for one have visited our Nations Capital twice in my life. I would say all need to visit it at least once to get a real appreciation for the Nation we live in.

                      THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

                      (See Note 1)

                      We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
                      establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,
                      promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
                      and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United
                      States of America.

                      Article. I.

                      Section 1.

                      All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the
                      United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

                      Section. 2.

                      Clause 1: The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen
                      every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each
                      State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous
                      Branch of the State Legislature.

                      Clause 2: No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to
                      the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United
                      States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which
                      he shall be chosen.

                      Clause 3: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the
                      several States which may be included within this Union, according to their
                      respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of
                      free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and
                      excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. (See Note
                      2)
                      The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first
                      Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term
                      of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The Number of
                      Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State
                      shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be
                      made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts
                      eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York
                      six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia
                      ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.

                      Clause 4: When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the
                      Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such
                      Vacancies.

                      Clause 5: The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other
                      Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

                      Section. 3.

                      Clause 1: The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators
                      from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, (See Note 3) for six
                      Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.

                      Clause 2: Immediately after they shall be assembled in Consequence of the
                      first Election, they shall be divided as equally as may be into three Classes.
                      The Seats of the Senators of the first Class shall be vacated at the Expiration
                      of the second Year, of the second Class at the Expiration of the fourth Year,
                      and of the third Class at the Expiration of the sixth Year, so that one third
                      may be chosen every second Year; and if Vacancies happen by Resignation, or
                      otherwise, during the Recess of the Legislature of any State, the Executive
                      thereof may make temporary Appointments until the next Meeting of the
                      Legislature, which shall then fill such Vacancies. (See Note 4)

                      Clause 3: No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age
                      of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who
                      shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be
                      chosen.

                      Clause 4: The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the
                      Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.

                      Clause 5: The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a President
                      pro tempore, in the Absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the
                      Office of President of the United States.

                      Clause 6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When
                      sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the
                      President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no
                      Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members
                      present.

                      Clause 7: Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to
                      removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor,
                      Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall
                      nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and
                      Punishment, according to Law.

                      Section. 4.

                      Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and
                      Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof;
                      but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except
                      as to the Places of chusing Senators.

                      Clause 2: The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such
                      Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, (See Note 5) unless
                      they shall by Law appoint a different Day.

                      Section. 5.

                      Clause 1: Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and
                      Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a
                      Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may
                      be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and
                      under such Penalties as each House may provide.

                      Clause 2: Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its
                      Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel
                      a Member.

                      Clause 3: Each House shall keep a Journal of its Proceedings, and from time
                      to time publish the same, excepting such Parts as may in their Judgment require
                      Secrecy; and the Yeas and Nays of the Members of either House on any question
                      shall, at the Desire of one fifth of those Present, be entered on the Journal.

                      Clause 4: Neither House, during the Session of Congress, shall, without the
                      Consent of the other, adjourn for more than three days, nor to any other Place
                      than that in which the two Houses shall be sitting.

                      Section. 6.

                      Clause 1: The Senators and Representatives shall receive a Compensation for
                      their Services, to be ascertained by Law, and paid out of the Treasury of the
                      United States. (See Note 6) They shall in all Cases, except Treason,
                      Felony and Breach of the Peace, beprivileged from Arrest during their Attendance
                      at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from
                      the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be
                      questioned in any other Place.

                      Clause 2: No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he
                      was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United
                      States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been
                      encreased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United
                      States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.

                      Section. 7.

                      Clause 1: All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of
                      Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on
                      other Bills.

                      Clause 2: Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and
                      the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the
                      United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it,
                      with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall
                      enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If
                      after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the
                      Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by
                      which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that
                      House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses
                      shall be determined by yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for
                      and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively.
                      If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays
                      excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in
                      like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment
                      prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

                      Clause 3: Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the
                      Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of
                      Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and
                      before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being
                      disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of
                      Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case
                      of a Bill.

                      Section. 8.

                      Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties,
                      Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and
                      general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall
                      be uniform throughout the United States;

                      Clause 2: To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

                      Clause 3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several
                      States, and with the Indian Tribes;

                      Clause 4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on
                      the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

                      Clause 5: To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and
                      fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

                      Clause 6: To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and
                      current Coin of the United States;

                      Clause 7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

                      Clause 8: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for
                      limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective
                      Writings and Discoveries;

                      Clause 9: To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

                      Clause 10: To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high
                      Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

                      Clause 11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make
                      Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

                      Clause 12: To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that
                      Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

                      Clause 13: To provide and maintain a Navy;

                      Clause 14: To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and
                      naval Forces;

                      Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of
                      the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

                      Clause 16: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia,
                      and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the
                      United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the
                      Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline
                      prescribed by Congress;

                      Clause 17: To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over
                      such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, byCession of particular
                      States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the
                      United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the
                      Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the
                      Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful
                      Buildings;--And

                      Clause 18: To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying
                      into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this
                      Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or
                      Officer thereof.

                      Section. 9.

                      Clause 1: The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States
                      now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the
                      Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or
                      duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each
                      Person.

                      Clause 2: The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended,
                      unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

                      Clause 3: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

                      Clause 4: No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in
                      Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.
                      (See Note 7)

                      Clause 5: No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

                      Clause 6: No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or
                      Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound
                      to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

                      Clause 7: No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of
                      Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts
                      and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

                      Clause 8: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no
                      Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the
                      Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of
                      any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

                      Section. 10.

                      Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation;
                      grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any
                      Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of
                      Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or
                      grant any Title of Nobility.

                      Clause 2: No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any
                      Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary
                      for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and
                      Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the
                      Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the
                      Revision and Controul of the Congress.

                      Clause 3: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of
                      Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement
                      or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless
                      actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

                      Article. II.

                      Section. 1.

                      Clause 1: The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United
                      States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and,
                      together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as
                      follows

                      Clause 2: Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof
                      may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and
                      Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no
                      Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under
                      the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

                      Clause 3: The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by
                      Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the
                      same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted
                      for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and
                      certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States,
                      directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in
                      the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the
                      Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the
                      greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of
                      the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have
                      such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of
                      Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and
                      if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said
                      House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President,
                      the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having
                      one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from
                      two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to
                      a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having
                      the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if
                      there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse
                      from them by Ballot the Vice President. (See Note 8)

                      Clause 4: The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and
                      the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same
                      throughout the United States.

                      Clause 5: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United
                      States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to
                      the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who
                      shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years
                      a Resident within the United States.

                      Clause 6: In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his
                      Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said
                      Office, (See Note 9) the Same shall devolve on the VicePresident, and the
                      Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or
                      Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer
                      shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the
                      Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.

                      Clause 7: The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a
                      Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period
                      for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that
                      Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

                      Clause 8: Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the
                      following Oath or Affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
                      faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the
                      best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United
                      States."

                      Section. 2.

                      Clause 1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of
                      the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into
                      the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing,
                      of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject
                      relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to
                      grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in
                      Cases of Impeachment.

                      Clause 2: He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the
                      Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;
                      and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate,
                      shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the
                      supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments
                      are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law:
                      but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as
                      they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads
                      of Departments.

                      Clause 3: The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may
                      happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall
                      expire at the End of their next Session.

                      Section. 3.

                      He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of
                      the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge
                      necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both
                      Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with
                      Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall
                      think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall
                      take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the
                      Officers of the United States.

                      Section. 4.

                      The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States,
                      shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason,
                      Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

                      Article. III.

                      Section. 1.

                      The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme
                      Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain
                      and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold
                      their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for
                      their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their
                      Continuance in Office.

                      Section. 2.

                      Clause 1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity,
                      arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties
                      made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting
                      Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and
                      maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a
                      Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and
                      Citizens of another State; (See Note 10)--between Citizens of different
                      States, --between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of
                      different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign
                      States, Citizens or Subjects.

                      Clause 2: In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and
                      Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have
                      original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme
                      Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such
                      Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

                      Clause 3: The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be
                      by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall
                      have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be
                      at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.

                      Section. 3.

                      Clause 1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying
                      War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
                      No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses
                      to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

                      Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason,
                      but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except
                      during the Life of the Person attainted.

                      Article. IV.

                      Section. 1.

                      Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts,
                      Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by
                      general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings
                      shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

                      Section. 2.

                      Clause 1: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and
                      Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

                      Clause 2: A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime,
                      who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of
                      the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be
                      removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

                      Clause 3: No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws
                      thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation
                      therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on
                      Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due. (See Note 11)

                      Section. 3.

                      Clause 1: New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no
                      new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State;
                      nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of
                      States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well
                      as of the Congress.

                      Clause 2: The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful
                      Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to
                      the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to
                      Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.

                      Section. 4.

                      The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican
                      Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on
                      Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot
                      be convened) against domestic Violence.

                      Article. V.

                      The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary,
                      shall propose Amendments to this
                      Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the
                      several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in
                      either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this
                      Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several
                      States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode
                      of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment
                      which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall
                      in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the
                      first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its
                      equal Suffrage in the Senate.

                      Article. VI.

                      Clause 1: All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the
                      Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under
                      this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

                      Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be
                      made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under
                      the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and
                      the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution
                      or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

                      Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members
                      of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both
                      of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or
                      Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be
                      required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United
                      States.

                      Article. VII.

                      The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall
                      be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so
                      ratifying the Same.

                      done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the
                      Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred
                      and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the
                      Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,

                      GO WASHINGTON--Presidt. and deputy from Virginia

                      [Signed also by the deputies of twelve States.]

                      Delaware

                      Geo: Read
                      Gunning Bedford jun
                      John Dickinson
                      Richard Bassett

                      Jaco: Broom

                      Maryland

                      James MCHenry
                      Dan of ST ThoS. Jenifer
                      DanL Carroll.

                      Virginia

                      John Blair--
                      James Madison Jr.

                      North Carolina

                      WM Blount
                      RichD. Dobbs Spaight.
                      Hu Williamson

                      South Carolina

                      J. Rutledge
                      Charles 1ACotesworth Pinckney
                      Charles Pinckney
                      Pierce
                      Butler.

                      Georgia

                      William Few
                      Abr Baldwin

                      New Hampshire

                      John Langdon
                      Nicholas Gilman

                      Massachusetts

                      Nathaniel Gorham
                      Rufus King

                      Connecticut
                      WM. SamL. Johnson
                      Roger Sherman

                      New York

                      Alexander Hamilton

                      New Jersey

                      Wil: Livingston
                      David Brearley.
                      WM. Paterson.
                      Jona: Dayton

                      Pennsylvania

                      B Franklin
                      Thomas Mifflin
                      RobT Morris
                      Geo. Clymer
                      ThoS.
                      FitzSimons
                      Jared Ingersoll
                      James Wilson.
                      Gouv Morris

                      Attest William Jackson Secretary

                      NOTES

                      Note 1: This text of the Constitution follows the engrossed copy signed by
                      Gen. Washington and the deputies from 12 States. The small superior figures
                      preceding the paragraphs designate Clauses, and were not in the original and
                      have no reference to footnotes.

                      The Constitution was adopted by a convention of the States on September 17,
                      1787, and was subsequently ratified by the several States, on the following
                      dates: Delaware, December 7, 1787; Pennsylvania, December 12, 1787; New Jersey,
                      December 18, 1787; Georgia, January 2, 1788; Connecticut, January 9, 1788;
                      Massachusetts, February 6, 1788; Maryland, April 28, 1788; South Carolina, May
                      23, 1788; New Hampshire, June 21, 1788.

                      Ratification was completed on June 21, 1788.

                      The Constitution was subsequently ratified by Virginia, June 25, 1788; New
                      York, July 26, 1788; North Carolina, November 21, 1789; Rhode Island, May 29,
                      1790; and Vermont, January 10, 1791.

                      In May 1785, a committee of Congress made a report recommending an alteration
                      in the Articles of Confederation, but no action was taken on it, and it was left
                      to the State Legislatures to proceed in the matter. In January 1786, the
                      Legislature of Virginia passed a resolution providing for the appointment of
                      five commissioners, who, or any three of them, should meet such commissioners as
                      might be appointed in the other States of the Union, at a time and place to be
                      agreed upon, to take into consideration the trade of the United States; to
                      consider how far a uniform system in their commercial regulations may be
                      necessary to their common interest and their permanent harmony; and to report to
                      the several States such an act, relative to this great object, as, when ratified
                      by them, will enable the United States in Congress effectually to provide for
                      the same. The Virginia commissioners, after some correspondence, fixed the first
                      Monday in September as the time, and the city of Annapolis as the place for the
                      meeting, but only four other States were represented, viz: Delaware, New York,
                      New Jersey, and Pennsylvania; the commissioners appointed by Massachusetts, New
                      Hampshire, North Carolina, and Rhode Island failed to attend. Under the
                      circumstances of so partial a representation, the commissioners present agreed
                      upon a report, (drawn by Mr. Hamilton, of New York,) expressing their unanimous
                      conviction that it might essentially tend to advance the interests of the Union
                      if the States by which they were respectively delegated would concur, and use
                      their endeavors to procure the concurrence of the other States, in the
                      appointment of commissioners to meet at Philadelphia on the Second Monday of May
                      following, to take into consideration the situation of the United States; to
                      devise such further provisions as should appear to them necessary to render the
                      Constitution of the Federal Government adequate to the exigencies of the Union;
                      and to report such an act for that purpose to the United States in Congress
                      assembled as, when agreed to by them and afterwards confirmed by the
                      Legislatures of every State, would effectually provide for the same.

                      Congress, on the 21st of February, 1787, adopted a resolution in favor of a
                      convention, and the Legislatures of those States which had not already done so
                      (with the exception of Rhode Island) promptly appointed delegates. On the 25th
                      of May, seven States having convened, George Washington, of Virginia, was
                      unanimously elected President, and the consideration of the proposed
                      constitution was commenced. On the 17th of September, 1787, the Constitution as
                      engrossed and agreed upon was signed by all the members present, except Mr.
                      Gerry of Massachusetts, and Messrs. Mason and Randolph, of Virginia. The
                      president of the convention transmitted it to Congress, with a resolution
                      stating how the proposed Federal Government should be put in operation, and an
                      explanatory letter. Congress, on the 28th of September, 1787, directed the
                      Constitution so framed, with the resolutions and letter concerning the same, to
                      "be transmitted to the several Legislatures in order to be submitted to a
                      convention of delegates chosen in each State by the people thereof, in
                      conformity to the resolves of the convention."

                      On the 4th of March, 1789, the day which had been fixed for commencing the
                      operations of Government under the new Constitution, it had been ratified by the
                      conventions chosen in each State to consider it, as follows: Delaware, December
                      7, 1787; Pennsylvania, December 12, 1787; New Jersey, December 18, 1787;
                      Georgia, January 2, 1788; Connecticut, January 9, 1788; Massachusetts, February
                      6, 1788; Maryland, April 28, 1788; South Carolina, May 23, 1788; New Hampshire,
                      June 21, 1788; Virginia, June 25, 1788; and New York, July 26, 1788.

                      The President informed Congress, on the 28th of January, 1790, that North
                      Carolina had ratified the Constitution November 21, 1789; and he informed
                      Congress on the 1st of June, 1790, that Rhode Island had ratified the
                      Constitution May 29, 1790. Vermont, in convention, ratified the Constitution
                      January 10, 1791, and was, by an act of Congress approved February 18, 1791,
                      "received and admitted into this Union as a new and entire member of the United
                      States."

                      Note 2: The part of this Clause relating to the mode of apportionment of
                      representatives among the several States has been affected by Section 2 of
                      amendment XIV, and as to taxes on incomes without apportionment by amendment
                      XVI.

                      Note 3: This Clause has been affected by Clause 1 of amendment XVII.

                      Note 4: This Clause has been affected by Clause 2 of amendment XVIII.

                      Note 5: This Clause has been affected by amendment XX.

                      Note 6: This Clause has been affected by amendment XXVII.

                      Note 7: This Clause has been affected by amendment XVI.

                      Note 8: This Clause has been superseded by amendment XII.

                      Note 9: This Clause has been affected by amendment XXV.

                      Note 10: This Clause has been affected by amendment XI.

                      Note 11: This Clause has been affected by amendment XIII.

                      This information has been compiled from the U.S. Code. The U.S. Code is published by the
                      Law Revision Counsel of the U.S. House of Representatives.

                      Updated September 20, 2004

                      • 3 votes
                      #1.165 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:56 PM EST

                      TheSwordNPen79

                      You forgot the disclaimer "void where prohibited by law".

                        #1.166 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:05 PM EST

                        I don't see any quotes from the Founders about the left's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment...BECAUSE THEY DON'T EXIST.

                        Figuring this out yet, StMiller?

                        And that's not a knock on the left, or endorsement of the right...both seem to abandon the original intent where it suits them.

                          #1.167 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 2:39 PM EST

                          realist: For the first time in the history of this world more people believe there is no God than believe one exists. Most believe the greatest lie ever told, you are your own god and the real one is just a faerie tale in the sky.

                          Hilarious. You spew your cultist rubbish, claiming again that your cult is correct, factual, and all the others are absurdly false. And you have absolutely ZERO PROOF to support your cult claims. And then, you jokingly call yourself "realist" -- which is the funniest part of it all...

                          Intentional lie or not -- the greatest practical joke ever played on mankind is your BuyBull.

                          Cheers!

                            #1.168 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 5:58 PM EST

                            DMorgan:

                            I’m not sure you are aware of this, or that you particularly care but I just visited your vine home page and took a quick review of your posts.

                            It seems that 90% of your comments are caustic, belligerent, and filled with hatred. I assume someone in your past taught you that if you didn't have anything nice to say not to say anything at all. What happened to you that made you such vocal a "Hater"?

                            I mean seriously dude, you're actually coming across as the same kind of person you seem to characterize in your attacks. Perhaps you should spend some time looking in the mirror and think about where all that hate comes from, if your lucky you may end up a better person, not one that no one would want to hang around.

                            If your highest ideal is one that man is unconstrained and therefore virtue can be perfected in man (such that the real problem is only to rid the world of the un-virtuous and each person is their own god.), you're falling WAY short of your OWN MARK.

                            You should check this video out as it applies to your seemingly blind hatred of religion:

                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dwz_Z62e0s&feature=player_embedded

                            • 1 vote
                            #1.169 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:31 AM EST
                            Reply

                            Wonder how they all got so anti-(whatever), too much Faux news.LOL nuts with arms.

                            • 75 votes
                            #2 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 11:32 PM EST

                            This is what happens when kids don't get enough love, confidence, and education growing up. I can't help but wonder what percentage of these people come from unhealthy/unstable homes.

                            • 39 votes
                            #2.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:24 AM EST
                            Comment author avatarMike Davis-433554Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            It's the natural reaction of white, male, Christians to having the US government slip out of the grip of their control. Obama is a real and symbolic threat to white, male, Christian control of the US government so they are panicking and now taking up anti-government, militant, and authoritarian stances because they feel like they can't control it through a democracy.

                            • 44 votes
                            #2.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:41 AM EST

                            Sit quietly still for a short time and experience what is true inside. If there's fear, ask some questions. It's possible to find some peace if we're not always so reactive. Some are asking or singing, why why occupy?! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49z3cheFN20

                            • 3 votes
                            #2.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:08 AM EST

                            The Sovereign Citizenship scam has been around since at least 1969. Do Google searches on Sovereign Citizenship scam and Posse Comitatus. These idiots put small down purchases on houses, take out loans to buy cars, furniture and appliances and apply for credit cards. They try to pay off their debts using fake bank drafts or bills of exchange and then get upset when the house gets foreclosed, the car gets repossessed and they get their wages garnished for non-payment of credit card debt. Then they file for bankruptcy and try to get the debts discharged by using the fake bank drafts and bills of exchange. Then they get upset when the bankruptcy judge will not discharge the debts by stating fraud was involved. The ones that don't file tax returns at some point end up in jail.

                            • 13 votes
                            #2.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:36 AM EST

                            RepubliCons gin these crazies up with Rupert Murdoch's help via his Tabloid Mentality news outlets, namely by the cult headquarters of Fox Tabloid entertainment. These crazies have no idea how they are being manipulated. They do not understand the world they live in and are very afraid - thanks to Murdoch! Religious leaders remain mute about them - many support them. The American people need protection from them and I am thankful that we - and President Obama- are being protected from them.

                            Domestic terrorists are just as bad as foreign terrorists. Visit Oklahoma City and ask Americans who were victims of this idiotic and paranoid mentality. I am thankful that our government is protecting our President as well as the rest of us AMERICANS!

                            (If people are conspiring to overthrow our government, I am behind whatever our government has to do to protect our government and our people. The Republicans lack of strong patriotic input against this racist faction, especially via their Fox Tabloid TV, proves where they stand. I would like to know their candidates opinions about them.)

                            • 18 votes
                            #2.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:08 AM EST

                            No it is not Fox news. Have you people buried your heads in the ground and isolated yourself from reality. It would be a defiinite benefit to a lot of you to watch Fox. It is the only station that does not give all and only the liberal take on everything. These people are not creating the so called militias because of the economy, it states in the article that they exploded when obama was elected. Duh!!! These people saw what was coming when democrats controlled the house, senate, and presidency. Taking away of our constitutional rights, democrats and liberals not abiding by the constitution, liberals like maxine waters and democrats touting the government takeover of businesses, which is socialism, the liberal trashing of our constitution. The occupy leaders stating they want to get rid of capitalism. This is why the militias are forming. I am not one, but totally understand why. At some point they may have to defend what our forefathers fought for over 200 years ago. Defend the constitution that you liberals and democrats take so lightly, those who do not care about the constitution, those liberals who do not want to abide by it, and those liberals and democrats like ginsburg who does not want the constitution and would like to throw it away.

                            • 24 votes
                            #2.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:43 AM EST
                            Comment author avatarlittlechangesExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                            These guys are the irrational new Ronald Reagan/George Bush version of the irrational old John Birch Society. The taproot is targeted hatred of women, especially black women; once you feel superior to half the planet's population, there's no stopping the crazy dick-grabbing violence. Yes, gays and lesbians are second on the list. But heck, they still harbor hatred not just for Bill Clinton but John Kennedy!, so there's not much help for these half wits. Instead of 1950/1960s knee-jerk "them damn Communist (fill in the blank)", the U.S. has to deal with 1990s/2000s knee-jerk "them damn Socialist (fill in the blank)". Dumb, crazy guys with guns are always dangerous for society, everywhere in the world. The U.S. protects treasures them not because of the Constitution, but because they are a source of income for those making money off them.

                            These redneck, semi-literate white guy hate groups are the grandsons of groups that operated long before 1/2 white Obama and long before ex-Fox Glenn Beck and other noxious reichwing crackpots inflamed by the ignorant, divisive bile spewed by Aussie Rupert Murdoch's corporation. But Murdoch and Roger Ailes figured out how to financially exploit that theocratic male stupidity, which, apparently knows no bounds. Canada looks better and better by the day. I do wish people would realize that, for decades, these guys have used the U.S. military to fund and train their endeavors. Stop calling every guy who joins the military and gets paid off the taxpayer dole a "hero." Ironic, they become employees of the very govt. they hate. Not so funny their sons will do the same. If only Mother Nature would produce fewer males and more females, the low rent trailer park part of the US wouldn't look so much like the Taliban.

                            • 13 votes
                            #2.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:50 AM EST

                            I can remember back in the late 70's watching the news and a report was coming out that Louisiana was adopting a law that all people , even Adults will have to wear a helmet when riding a motorcycle, and they where doing it for our own good. My daddy was sitting in his chair behind me said that's what Stalin said to the Russian people. Its for your own good.

                            I know that everybody should where a helmet and seat belts when on the road but it isn't the governments responsibility as a free nation to tell me what is good for me. When you let the government start, there will be no end. It may take 100 years but it will happen. Personally I don't think extreme mountain climbing, and jumping out of a perfectly good plain makes any sense but I do respect the right of the individual to make that choice and not the government.

                            In fact I use to wear my seat belt till they told me I had too. I stopped.

                            • 9 votes
                            #2.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:03 AM EST

                            The thing about fox news is, they lie right to your face, they know exactly what pushes your buttons, and none of y'all ever think to ask any questions about the twang y'all just accept as fact.

                            • 18 votes
                            #2.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:09 AM EST

                            The thing about fox news is, they lie right to your face, they know exactly what pushes your buttons, and none of y'all ever think to ask any questions about the twang y'all just accept as fact.

                            You seem to be one those who believes the lie that everyone not a democrat watches fox and doesn't think or educated themselves. You have made this assumption because you were told it was true and haven't done any question asking to see if it is true. I rarely if ever watch fox and get most of my information from liberal outlets like U.S. News, MSNBC, and the local newspaper. How is it then I still consider myself conservative on most issues?

                            Fox is on 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and has both news shows along with commentary shows, you do know the difference don't you?

                            • 6 votes
                            #2.11 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:46 AM EST

                            No it is not Fox news. Have you people buried your heads in the ground and isolated yourself from reality. It would be a defiinite benefit to a lot of you to watch Fox. It is the only station that does not give all and only the liberal take on everything. These people are not creating the so called militias because of the economy, it states in the article that they exploded when obama was elected. Duh!!! These people saw what was coming when democrats controlled the house, senate, and presidency. Taking away of our constitutional rights, democrats and liberals not abiding by the constitution, liberals like maxine waters and democrats touting the government takeover of businesses, which is socialism, the liberal trashing of our constitution. The occupy leaders stating they want to get rid of capitalism. This is why the militias are forming. I am not one, but totally understand why. At some point they may have to defend what our forefathers fought for over 200 years ago. Defend the constitution that you liberals and democrats take so lightly, those who do not care about the constitution, those liberals who do not want to abide by it, and those liberals and democrats like ginsburg who does not want the constitution and would like to throw it away.

                            Take a deep breath mark. They said the same thing when Clinton was in office and he was a white boy from the south. These guys just don't like liberals. They live is some anti-government fantasy land and knowing nothing whatsoever about the real world and how it works. they are always on the rise when a Democrat is in office.

                            • 9 votes
                            #2.12 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:50 AM EST
                            Comment author avatarMary Henrichvia Facebook

                            This is the start one group. the press has blacked out occupy. police even arrested some [occupy] stating 'hate crimes' its all BS get on you tube and see what the WORLD is protesting..or be marched in to a fema camps'to be safe' halliburton' runs FEMA now...wake up now...look into occupy,fema camp,halliburton

                            occupy 99% is not out to kill the 1% that has stole the white house and paid off the GOV. they have killed the bill of rights.and most dont even know it.the press has blacked it out.

                            • 5 votes
                            #2.13 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:11 AM EST

                            It's the natural reaction of white, male, Christians...

                            No it isn't. It's the unnatural reaction of frustrated nuts with self-esteem issues.

                            label them redneck illiterate country bumpkins

                            There's nothing wrong with being a redneck or a country bumpkin, and nothing evil about being illiterate, though learning to read and write is so important, it's self-defeating not to.

                            And there's nothing wrong with owning guns or using them properly.

                            But these guys are nuts. They are tolerable insofar as they don't hurt anyone, but their 'philosophy' has spawned plenty of terrorists and other criminals. Some of them would probably be nice people if they weren't so woefully misguided, but others are beyond the pale. Catering to them is foolish.

                            • 4 votes
                            #2.14 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:08 AM EST

                            Wonder how they all got so anti-(whatever), too much Faux news.LOL nuts with arms.

                            This is what happens when kids don't get enough love, confidence, and education growing up.

                            It's the natural reaction of white, male, Christians to having the US government slip out of the grip of their control. Obama is a real and symbolic threat to white, male, Christian control of the US government so they are panicking and now taking up anti-government, militant, and authoritarian stances because they feel like they can't control it through a democracy.

                            Or... Maybe because there's a historical f*cking precedent for citizen militias independent of federal government control-- and these groups have been around, some of them, since the inception of our nation. Remember, while you deride the right-wing/GOP that it was the left-wing, democratic president JFK who stated:

                            "Today we need a nation of minute men; citizens who are not only prepared to take up arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as a basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."

                            Care to temper your vitriolic rhetoric? Also, see my comment at 1.101

                            • 4 votes
                            #2.15 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:08 AM EST

                            A: It's the natural reaction of white, male, Christians...

                            B: No it isn't. It's the unnatural reaction of frustrated nuts with self-esteem issues.

                            C: Yeah. White male christians!

                            ________________________________________________________________________

                            A.... label them redneck illiterate country bumpkins

                            B: There's nothing wrong with being a redneck or a country bumpkin

                            C: it's nothing to brag about, either... for a growing number of Americans, being a BuyBull-thumping mindless moron, steaming with hatred for anyone who doesn't believe in your unprovable, mythical nonsense, is justification enough for fringe behavior that seems to sit just fine with far too many people...

                            • 6 votes
                            #2.16 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:23 AM EST

                            Open your eyes people. If the government continues to intrude on our civil liberties these groups will only grow. Stay the F out of our personal lives! It's not up to the government to decide what we can eat, what we have to purchase, who can have an abortion, what guns we can buy, what I can have sitting on my front lawn, etc etc! And it's a very thin line between our law enforcement agents and a criminal.

                            And to the rest of you who think everybody should live their lives as you do I hope you catch one of the first bullets to fly!

                            • 3 votes
                            #2.17 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:32 AM EST

                            DMorgan -- your statement at 2.16 seems to be an opposite, but equal hatred to the "growing number of Americans, being a BuyBull-thumping mindless moron, steaming with hatred for anyone who doesn't believe in [their] unprovable, mythical nonsense." Your caustic pronouncement against people of faith is just as dangerous as the judgment of the faithful against the faithless. Unless you are willing to lead by example, then you have no place to criticize those that do not agree with you.

                            (And no, I am not a "BuyBull" thumping Christian-- but I can recognize hateful discrimination when I see it).

                            • 4 votes
                            #2.18 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:04 AM EST

                            I was a democrat. My party went so far left I can't follow them. Make me choose between who my people have been for a thousand years and who you demand I be against my will. I'll choose the the thousand year ancestry. This time I'm not an immigrant like the last time you attacked us. I'll stand my ground and make you arrest me then fight it in court. But I do feel my government is actively attacking my people.

                            • 2 votes
                            #2.19 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:26 AM EST

                            The concept of an armed militia was created over 200 years ago. Armed militias were effective in the 1700s because they had access to the newest technology - guns. Wake up boys; the world has changed. Charging forward with an automatic weapon may sound romantic but it is stupid. Wars of the future will not be won with guns. If you choose to march forward you will face a battle hardened National Guard and have no chance of surviving. Get smart. Get active politically. Learn to use the new tools. Stop wasting your time and all the gunpowder.

                            • 3 votes
                            #2.20 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:27 AM EST

                            Michael Bishop Getting political active is bull. Republicans are Democrats. Decomcrats are Republicans. You vote for Obama you get crap. You vote for Romney you get more crap. Both are crap. The only person that could make a difference will never get elected. Ron Paul or Sarah Palin. Too many people are afraid of that type of change. I would rather put my trust in guns and gunpowder than our leadership in government. My guns can protect me, you and your political hacks can't.

                            • 4 votes
                            #2.21 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:08 PM EST

                            WMG: DMorgan -- your statement at 2.16 seems to be an opposite, but equal hatred to the "growing number of Americans, being a BuyBull-thumping mindless moron, steaming with hatred for anyone who doesn't believe in [their] unprovable, mythical nonsense." Your caustic pronouncement against people of faith is just as dangerous as the judgment of the faithful against the faithless. Unless you are willing to lead by example, then you have no place to criticize those that do not agree with you.

                            LMFAO! Wow, you did a great job of "restating" my words, and then purposely misstating what their meaning is. Lovely. You could go to work, sitting right next to Rush on his radio show!

                            Your caustic pronouncement against people of faith...

                            Wow! yeah, that's what I said alright! LOL -- a wholesale judgement of all "people of faith". This article is not about "people of faith" -- it's about these right-wing, over zealous whack-jobs, many of whom ARE fueled by ridiculous religious dogma. Some people can actually read their religious books and NOT lash out against people. Why? Because they don't "think" the scriptures tell them to...they don't "think" their god hates the same people they do... Unfortunately, we have too many people in America who think otherwise!

                            is just as dangerous as the judgment of the faithful against the faithless

                            Again! LOL! It isn't the faithful against the faithless in this country. It is millions of hateful mainstream christians against everyone else -- those without cult beliefs, and those simply with DIFFERENT beliefs. These are the people who are ALWAYS making the attacks, and the latter are those who are always defending themselves against this legislated cult rubbish which the religious reich keeps championing...

                            • 3 votes
                            #2.22 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:28 PM EST

                            BikeBoy: The only person that could make a difference will never get elected. Ron Paul or Sarah Palin.

                            LMFAO! The most hilarious comment made today so far...

                            • 7 votes
                            #2.23 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:30 PM EST

                            Bike boy - This is the 21st century. The domestic problems we face don't amount to much more than house keeping. The banking and investment execs caused more damage to the US economy than any middle eastern terrorist could have dreamed of. If you want to do something effective, start filing law suits against the bankers and investment execs and elect officials who will charge them with treason. Organized, you can defeat the oligarch puppet masters.

                            All that target practice may feel like you have options but in reality it will do you no good. Running around in the woods with a bunch of Rambo wannabe's may be good exercise but you will never get a shot off. The real enemies of the US will not attack us with guns of any size. They are brewing up biological and chemical weapons that will take out up to 80% of the population within a month (it took 3 weeks for the 1918 flu to spread from the east coast to Calif). Our government is the best the world has ever seen. Parts of it may have been hijacked but those people can be rotated out the next election cycle.

                            Only a strong federal government can provide the resources we need to detect and stop those who would want to destroy us. I respect Ron Paul and want Bush's Patriot Act gutted. Paul has been a trooper and often right about defining the issues and solving them but he is too old and becoming less articulate each year. Sarah Palin is a prom queen looking for a party. She has demonstrated that she was contemptuous of her constituency in AK and is proud of her ignorance. Get over her.

                            • 3 votes
                            #2.24 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:50 PM EST

                            If the President wants to bring the country together, he could just announce he is not running again. There will then be no need to have militia. The folks who critcize Militia do not see their rights eroding away a day at a time when the Democrats are in office in Washington. It has nothing to do with the color of the President, but everything to do with the Dictatorial ways of this Administration and the Democrats in general. Count me in! I pledge to get 10 voters to cast their vote for the Republican ticket. Hopefully this call will be taken up by all who love their country and Freedom.

                            • 2 votes
                            #2.25 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:18 PM EST

                            Funny how these people willing to fight for freedom and the constitution are being marked as terrorists. The real terrorists are those who take away citizens' rights. The terrorists are the ones who bust into people's houses armed to the teeth in tactical gear in the middle of the night because someone grew some plants. They are the religious freaks who scare their children with the thought that everything they do is sinful and God is watching. The terrorists are the bankers and stock brokers who literally destroy families. They are those who use fear to get what they want. The are the prison and military/industrial complexes. They are the threat of war because politicians don't respect other peoples' sovereignty and right to self determination. The terrorists are the judges who convict the innocent and uphold unconstitutional laws and practices. Terrorism is an authoritarian system in which no amount of logic or reason can persuade the authority. Terrorism is being controlled by immoral greedy idiots. It is giving away half of what you make for things you disagree with in the first place. Terrorists are the ones who lie and spread propoganda. They make you fear your neighbor. Terrorists are the journalists who intentionally spread fear. (Reefer madness, crazy militia men, Iraq has WMD's)

                            If you do the research, these sovereign citizens have a very strong legal argument as well as having common sense on their side. They are correct that when the federal government breaks its contract with the people, it no longer has a legitimate claim to power. Individuals are not the only ones who see it this way. Almost half of our states have likewise declared sovereignty.

                            This is mostly due to the Federal government using its right to regulate interstate commerce. The problem is, the feds consider all commerce as being inherently tied to interstate commerce and therefore part of it. This argument was once used to prohibit marijuana. Of course that was when they had to be sneaky since everyone at that time knew it was unconstitutional to regulate the cannabis plant in this way. Before this trick they had devised a scheme where one needed to take their crop to D.C. to purchase a tax stamp, except it was ilegal to bring cannabis into DC. The federal government often relies on intentional misinterpretation of the law.It was even recently decided in court that if Police forcefully enter your home accidently while serving a warrant, you have no right to resist them.

                            • 1 vote
                            #2.26 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:29 PM EST

                            Good job for not knowing jack about your own country, the Enlightenment, or Civil Disobedience.

                            All individuals are sovereign, the governments of the world (if they are compulsory states) can only aggress gainst that sovereignty.

                            If you have the mental and physical ability to govern yourself, then you have the right to govern yourself. If you harm no others or their properties in governing yourself, then LOGICALLY all external compulsory government is tyranny.

                            It's the natural reaction of white, male, Christians to having the US government slip out of the grip of their control.

                            Except I'm not white or Christian, and the head of my State's militia is black. Anything else, bigot?

                            • 2 votes
                            #2.27 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:30 PM EST

                            well said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                            • 1 vote
                            #2.28 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:33 PM EST

                            Mr. Bishop;

                            This country is called the United States of America, not the country of America. It has 50 small countries making up a whole with the Federal Gov't who was designed to engage in foreign wars and to create commerce for all states sitting on a small plot of land called the District of Columbia. It is about the size of any state's smallest county or parrish.

                            The National Guard is also controlled by the Governor of the state and as the Democrats know and Nancy Pelosi has said on the news, the Federal military is the training and breeding ground for freedom lovers, whom she calls "terrorists". I think the National Guard and the Federal Army would not be fully for the Federal Gov't in the event of a civil war. There are too many intelligent people in the service today that also love their states and do not like to see what is happening in Washington.

                            We all love our country, and I am sure no one wants to see a civil war, but if it comes to losing anymore of our freedoms due to the Federal Gov't and this Administration, then I think we are fast approaching one. Increasing the militia by 6 times isn't a legacy President Obama or any politician would like to be known for. He should just quit while he is ahead.

                            You should Vote Republican in NOV 2012 and get as many others to vote Republican.

                              #2.29 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:46 PM EST

                              Good lord, people! Why is that the right-wing side can't see the difference between taking away guns and gun control?

                              Obama is in favor of gun control, he's not "after your guns," get a grip already! He is in favor of better background checks, of gun sellers actually enforcing the rules and laws, and of limiting ridiculous-sized magazines and assault weapons for general sale.

                              The 2nd Amendment says people have a right to bear arms to protect their family and property. Even if you stretch that to include being able to hunt for food, I can only see the logic in handguns, rifles and maybe shotguns being legal. You do not need an assault weapon to protect your home, or kill a deer. You do not need 32-rounds to scare away a burglar or shoot someone threatening your safety, particularly if you are a responsible gun owner and can shoot with any accuracy.

                              Gun advocates argue that "if you outlaw guns, only the outlaws will have guns" and say that since criminals can get access to these weapons, then normal people should too. Since when does two wrongs make a right? Maybe if those type of weapons were only manufactured for military use, and were not available on the open market they wouldn't also be so readily available on the black market. These weapons are all over the place, of course criminals can get access to them!

                              And now we have all these "militias" that try to say they are peaceful and not a danger, and don't intend to be violent, yet are armed to the teeth. Are we supposed to believe this is a coincidence? Of course they don't want gun control, then they can't build their own army. And we're supposed to believe they are only building an army because they are afraid they will lose their guns. Nice try.

                                #2.30 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:05 PM EST

                                No chance of surviving? It seems like an armed militia - the Taliban, has not only survived for the past 10 years, but is on the verge of beating us (as it did the USSR) using only small arms and improvised explosives against the most advanced weapons that we possess (except for the nukes). And do you really think the "battle hardened National Guard" will fire on their own friends/family? I think it is far more likely they will turn their weapons on those who would give such an order.

                                  #2.31 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:14 PM EST

                                  JLS these people feel like they are being backed into a corner. Every animal needs a certain amount of freedom and self control for a functional sense of well being. Horses need to be broken by the hand of man to be useful in the hands of man, but are afterwards never their whole and natural selves. Men should not be similarly broken although Pavlovian training is tyranny's bread and butter.

                                  Now for some people, being a broken animal doesn't bother them, they barely even notice. For others, those who are aware of it, it is a constant source of anxiety. What one man feels when a hand is about to strike him may pale in comparison to what another feels simply knowing he could be struck.

                                  Simply put, there are a lot more people becoming aware of how powerless they are at the hands of a giant power-hungry centralized authority. Imagine growing up, that every time you tried to use your full brain, certain neurons and portions of the brain were selectively discouraged via discipline. It would be gradual, but these parts would go to sleep. This could include the part of your mind that reacts to fear or anxiety being retarded by training. Its called behavioral modification and if it happens incrementally and gradually it is nearly impossible to observe. People are waking up and becoming aware of what happened

                                    #2.32 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:54 PM EST

                                    Let me go on the record here to say that Mark387384 is rising in support of these dangerous, subversive groups.

                                    Mark. You are but a product of FOX and Co.'s malicious and wreckless propaganda machine. That and your own small mind and bigoted leanings have combined to make you completely insane.

                                    Deluded, racist, Constitutionally ignorant, supremacist inmates are trying to take over the assylum.

                                    Come and get it, boys.

                                      #2.33 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:54 PM EST

                                      You certainly do not have to be in a Militia to be armed to the teeth as you say.. People of all walks have been gearing up and stocking up.. When one sees a threat to ones civil liberties it is prudent to take steps to guard against the threat.. Obama has helped sell a lot of guns and ammo..

                                      Gun owners are afraid of Mr. president Obama because before he was commander in chief he sponsored a bill that would have put a $10 tax per round of ammo, Hillary was having a wet dream about that and was very upset when he changed course and allowed the weapons ban expire.. If a tax like that is not gun control then what the F is?? He later abandoned this path until some future time because it was not very popular with the voters.. This fantasy that all militia groups are white hate groups is total insinuated lies.. Most just want the knowledge and Means to protect their family and community from possible threats like armed and organized inner-city gangs that are real and not perceived threats and kill more people and commit more crimes in 1 year in the US then all the peaceful and radical Militia groups that have existed in 50 years including McVeigh.. You surely don't have to be in a Militia to have misplaced hate, Ted Kazinski the uni-bomber comes to mind..You do know that the police are not there to protect you.. They are only charged with investigating and apprehending people who have broken a law and that you are responsible for your own safety.. Our sheriffs department told us this when my wife called them after we were threatened death by a person with violent mental issues.. My neighbor a militia member helped guard our family because I was out of the area.. The person who threatened us eventually committed suicide after becoming violent with his own family..

                                        #2.34 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:04 PM EST

                                        TNRebel: I love reading all the comments from the intellectual ivory tower types...LOL...

                                        Yeah, them thar edumacated folks! I hate them, too!! (eye roll)

                                        You just don't get it...So label them redneck illiterate country bumpkins...

                                        OK...no problem there!

                                        I would rather spend a weekend with them, then with you discussing the finer points of wine ,high dollar coffee shops,

                                        LOL...wow. In all your list of hatred, you now go to the wine lovers -- one of the fastest growing industries in the US, despite our lovely Bush Recession... and then, the demonic "expensive coffee shop" folks. while starbucks (to name one of those wildly successful yet horrible things!) employs almost 150,000 people in over 17,000 retail stores.

                                        or how you think wealth should be redistributed

                                        LOL. from a guy supporting whack-jobs who think they shouldn't pay any taxes, but will be the first to use medicare, medicaid, social security, drive on roads, call police and fire when they need them, etc, etc, etc.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #2.35 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:01 PM EST

                                        blahblah and roadrunner - i repeat - get a grip. Gun CONTROL is not TAKING AWAY GUNS. How hard is that to understand? Who really needs an assault rifle besides the military, honestly? If you think wanting to enforce background checks means your guns will get taken away, then I guess that means you recognize that you qualify as someone crazy enough to not be allowed to be armed.

                                        blahblah, nobody has brainwashed you or I. That is simply ridiculous. Wanting better gun control and safety is not akin to backing anyone into a corner. Nobody is being broken like a horse. The idea that people don't need assault rifles for daily use, or 32-round magazines is not taking away your freedoms. Sheesh. That argument is stale and pathetic.

                                        Roadrunner - sure, the police can only really do anything when the law has already been broken, it's a messed up system, we all know that. Nobody is against the 2nd Amendment. But the right to bear arms to protect yourself does not mean you need an AK-47 or a 32-round clip! Do you need to pump 30 bullets into the bad guy, or do you think a couple might suffice? If you are really a responsible gun owner and know how to use it, it shouldn't require much for you to hit your target. And most militia groups are located in rural areas in compounds - so what inner-city gang is threatening them? And of course you don't have to be in a militia to have misplaced hate, nobody said that. I'm glad there was someone around to protect your family when threatened by a crazy violent person, but I don't think they had to be a militia member to do so.

                                        All this fear-mongering hasn't led anywhere. "oh no, Obama is going to tax ammo and take away our guns, quick - buy as much as you can now!" - and what happened with that? Oh yeah, everyone panicked, and the tax didn't go through and the guns haven't been taken away. And did it ever occur to either of you that a tax like that would maybe make people more responsible about how and when they choose to discharge their firearms, because of the cost? Maybe the financial cost is the only way to remind some of you of the potential cost in lives if you are irresponsible. Kind of like the high taxes on cigarettes, it's a deterrent. Just maybe, people would make sure they only used them to protect their families, or to hunt for food, and not just for sh!ts and giggles or to be a bada$$ militia member.

                                        The bottom line is, the 2nd amendment only provides the right to bear arms in protection. And that would mean an actual threat, not a perceived government boogey-man.

                                          #2.36 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:52 PM EST

                                          LOL DMorgan, I didn't read TNRebel's post, sounds like it was a hoot. Do these people really think that you either have to be an uneducated, anti-government, conspiracy-theorist, gun-toting lunatic OR a snobby wine-loving coffee drinker? LMAO!

                                          Sorry to burst his bubble, but I hate wine and don't drink coffee. And I have no problem with people exercising their 2nd Amendment rights. But I do have a problem with people being gun-toting lunatics who feel the need to have as many guns as possible and to have assault rifles for no reason, because they imagine the government is out to get them.

                                          blahblah talked about brainwashing.......i think they are the ones who are brainwashed. i mean, they listen to the NRA and the gun lobbyist's lines, the people who manufacture the guns and obviously have a huge motivation to keep people buying them - what idiot thinks a salesman is the most honest source of information?

                                            #2.37 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:59 PM EST

                                            oh and one last thing Roadrunner - your comments about the police not being able to do anything until the law has already been broken.....well duh - for someone so concerned with personal liberties being taken away, would you really argue for a system in which we punish people for things they MIGHT do? Or threaten to do? Cuz whenever right-wingnuts threaten abortion doctors, or the like, they hide behind the first amendment, as I recall. They can threaten all they want as long as they don't break the law, right? So what did you really want the Sheriff to do? That is exactly why it's a messed up system, there's simply no easy answer, it's a rock and a hard place. Which is of course why we have the 2nd Amendment. But again, protecting yourself doesn't amount to having an arsenal.

                                              #2.38 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:03 PM EST

                                              Gun CONTROL is not TAKING AWAY GUNS

                                              Then pass an Amendmenmt. You can't overrule the Constitution with a lesser law. "Interpretation" be damned, the original intent is clear: gun control is illegal.

                                              Besides, anyone who is versed in game theory mathematics knows that the only people who follow such rules are law abiding gun owners, who then become potential victims to the only people commiting murders to begin with; criminals who don't follow those rules.

                                              Your mental problem is that you believe rules solve problems. In fact, they don't. Sociopaths don't follow rules. M<aking rational rules only works on the rational. Stop trying to govern all sane people for what a tiny percentage of insane people do...who won't follow your governance anyway.

                                              And why control guns at all? There are 100,000,000 gun owners in this country with 200,000,000 guns. There are only 11,000 murders per year. That's .011% (or 1/100th of a percent) of the total gun owners being murderers.

                                              You literally want to govern and control the 99.989% for what the .o11% do. It's stupid on it's premises.

                                                #2.39 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 2:49 PM EST

                                                Notice how anti-gays, anti-hippies, anti-terrorists, anti-Muslims etc. are always called hate groups. But anti-Christians never are.

                                                  #2.40 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 4:25 PM EST

                                                  that's like saying Hitler was a hatemonger, but anyone who hated him right back isn't...

                                                  Of course people hated him right back! And, of course people hate christians right back, for all the hatred and deigration they spew out to millions of Americans at every opportunity.

                                                  You should really stop being silly with your inane analogies.

                                                  Christians seem to think that they can take shots at people -- yet, when their targets shoot back, they cry "we're the victims! we're the victims!!" What nonsense. There has never been a larger hate group in this country than christianity.

                                                    #2.41 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 6:05 PM EST
                                                    Reply
                                                    Comment author avatarMax Murtaughvia Facebook

                                                    Well written article, with obviously alot of research to boot, hope to see more from this writer in the future!

                                                    • 25 votes
                                                    #3 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 11:43 PM EST

                                                    You're right. The only problem is the "source" of the research, primarily a discredited, biased, prejudiced organization known as the SPLC. Who, by the way, produces their "reports" primarily at the behest of those who pay them big bucks to do so.

                                                    • 19 votes
                                                    #3.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:25 AM EST

                                                    I smell an endorsement for this article from DHS and DOJ.

                                                    • 13 votes
                                                    #3.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:41 AM EST

                                                    Kinda like Rush and his sponsors.

                                                    • 9 votes
                                                    #3.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:14 AM EST

                                                    Max, you have GOT to be kidding! The article is pure hate speech. The article is pure propaganda!

                                                    • 13 votes
                                                    #3.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:24 AM EST

                                                    Good NutBag expose! Clinging like there's gonna be no tomorrow! What a hoot!

                                                    • 10 votes
                                                    #3.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:04 AM EST

                                                    The thing I have noticed with the so called liberal media is that they will try to present both sides to a story where there is no such thing with conservative media. Its a shame that with the explosion of all types of media that we as a country have become more divided. It allows hate groups to become more narrow minded when they are able to only see and hear what they want, apparently being open minded isnt a survival trait.

                                                    • 6 votes
                                                    #3.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:23 AM EST

                                                    "The movement includes paramilitary militias as well as groups of "sovereign citizens," who believe they are not subject to federal or state laws, nor obligated to pay federal taxes according to SPLC." So what the SPLC is saying is, these militias are starting to act like the people in office, above the law and cheating on their taxes.

                                                    • 10 votes
                                                    #3.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:15 AM EST

                                                    Carl S: Who, by the way, produces their "reports" primarily at the behest of those who pay them big bucks to do so.

                                                    Whoops! there you go, bringing Faux News and Rush LimpBag into the conversation again!!

                                                    • 5 votes
                                                    #3.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:27 AM EST

                                                    Ha! Right on Tommy!

                                                    • 3 votes
                                                    #3.10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:54 AM EST

                                                    Funny how hate groups like the Black Muslims, CAIR and Media Matters never seem to get any notice from these progressive puritans like SPLC. I guess they are employing their "weapons of choice" in spewing their hate.

                                                    I also note the tons of "collapsed" (i.e. censored) comments by the guardians of political correctness here with the MSM. I have some news for them: they are a dying form of media. We know your game and we're not buying it any more.

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #3.11 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:57 AM EST

                                                    Isn't "Christian militia" an oxymoron?

                                                    • 6 votes
                                                    #3.12 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:01 PM EST

                                                    Isn't "Christian militia" an oxymoron?

                                                    "christian values" certainly is!

                                                    • 6 votes
                                                    #3.13 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:14 PM EST

                                                    DMorgan

                                                    Carl S: Who, by the way, produces their "reports" primarily at the behest of those who pay them big bucks to do so.

                                                    Whoops! there you go, bringing Faux News and Rush LimpBag into the conversation again!!............................lets continue with the corporate wealthy bought and paid for propaganda machines known as think tanks..... the heritage foundation the cato institute, the manhatten institute, club for growth, americans for prosperity, the heartland foundation... there isn't enough space to list them all here.

                                                    • 3 votes
                                                    #3.14 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:37 PM EST

                                                    Jerry King;

                                                    Show me one of these groups who has "Christian" in their names. Missouri 59th, Missouri 9th, Missouri 25th, Missouri 17th. This is the theme followed state to state. I see none of them that has Christian in the name. Strangely, according the SPLC the states with the fastest militia growth are California, Oregon, Washington state, Illinois, and new York state. Odd given their decidedly leftist governments, don't you think?

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #3.15 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:45 PM EST

                                                    agreed!

                                                      #3.16 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:45 PM EST

                                                      Membership then dropped sharply during President George W. Bush’s two terms before rebounding in late 2008 after the election of Obama

                                                      Well well, we can see what kind of people Republicans are after reading this quote....Fear mongering, paranoid, racists. Surprise surprise!

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #3.17 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:52 PM EST

                                                      Show me one of these groups who has "Christian" in their names. Missouri 59th, Missouri 9th, Missouri 25th, Missouri 17th

                                                      Irrelevant. Ku Klux Klan doesn't have "christian" in its name. Focus on the Family doesn't either. Neither does 700 Club. But they are christian POS's through and through.

                                                      • 3 votes
                                                      #3.18 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:19 PM EST

                                                      "This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it."

                                                      Abraham Lincoln (1st Inaugural Address, March 4, 1861)

                                                        #3.19 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:38 PM EST

                                                        Allow me to go on the record saying that BigTex is calling for the overthrow of the government.

                                                        Anybody listening?

                                                          #3.20 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:59 PM EST

                                                          Anybody listening to a guy from a state that gave us Dumbya Bush, and then, tried to stick it to us again with another idiotic, BuyBull-thumping, self-righteous evangelist governor? Nope - not listening to anyone spewing rubbish from texas.

                                                          Cheers!

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          #3.21 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:05 PM EST

                                                          shut yer yap...
                                                          That was a quote from one of our greatest presidents, but feel free to say what you want, i'm sure nobody is listening to you.

                                                          DMorgan...
                                                          What are you, eleven? Your plays on words are so witty and unique and origional. Try to be a big boy.

                                                            #3.22 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:33 PM EST

                                                            @ Jerry King and DMorgan, The best Oxymoron know to man is Politically Correct.

                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            #3.23 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:01 PM EST

                                                            These racist idiots are nothing more than American Terrorists and no better than the Taliban.

                                                              #3.24 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 4:39 PM EST

                                                              In spite of your whining, big-tex, the only thing i "need" to be here is honest. You may want to try that from time to time...I notice you haven't tried it yet.

                                                                #3.25 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 6:21 PM EST

                                                                DMorgan...

                                                                #1 When was I whining?

                                                                #2 Show me one instance when I was dishonest. Just one.

                                                                Sorry if I offended any eleven-year-olds out there by comparing this guy to you.

                                                                  #3.26 - Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:25 AM EST
                                                                  Reply
                                                                  Comment author avatargemininimegExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                  If the militias are afraid Obama will be re-elected then they need to kill off the current Republican candidates. With all their weapons it shouldn't be a problem. Especially for a bunch of terrified little cowards. Man, how do you deal with yourself when you live you life being scared to death? Buy a bunch of guns I guess.

                                                                  • 25 votes
                                                                  Reply#4 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 11:43 PM EST

                                                                  You can tell a lot about a person's character by observing them when they don't get their way.

                                                                  • 37 votes
                                                                  #4.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:26 AM EST

                                                                  can we not wish for the death of people based on political ideology? thanks.

                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                  #4.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:54 AM EST

                                                                  I can agree with that statement James! Anyone that wants the government to run their lives ought to be the first in line.

                                                                  One poster states: In words even a totally crazed Person can understand - the government has biggger, bettter and more guns; In the unlikely vent the govrnment wants to come around and confiscate somebody's 9mms they will confiscate it

                                                                  I don't know about this comment, seems the backwoods Taliban is giving them a heck of a go and they can't even read. You libs need not to get your panties all waded up, the militia's are not against democrats or just republicans. They are standing up for the Constitution of the United States, not some idiot who thinks he knows what best for our Nation. It really doesn't matter what color he is! Keep on believing that if you want, just shows who the real racist are!

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  #4.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:28 AM EST

                                                                  Nice spelling and word usage, darrell. Did you drop out of the third grade, or the fourth?

                                                                    #4.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:30 AM EST

                                                                    I'm not a militia kind of guy, But if these folks want to join a milita. Let them. The group SPLC is the biased organization. If the liberals of the demodratic party sneezed they would break SPLC neck ( I'll let you figure out where there head is) This country was founded on freedom. However I must admit that I'm becoming very concerned about the path of our Government. Patriot act, Defence authorization act, Defence secretary Panetta just made a statement to congress that The US military can deploy force through the UN and not with the US congresses approval. Even President Obama made the statement even though he signed the Defence authorization act "He would never use it". THEN WHY SIGN IT INTO LAW. Who made him sign it. Who is forcing the POTUS to sign into law something he does not believe in. This is a problem caused not by just Democrats but Republicans also.

                                                                      #4.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:03 PM EST
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      Comment author avatarJohn Brown-4602833Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                      Fox News? I think many of the militia members despise Fox News. The story is quick to paint these men and women as right wingers, when in reality, they are American patriots. These men and women are the people's line of defense against an unconstitutional federal government. Thank you, militia. May we all remember our American roots, and pray we need never employ popular militia on our soil. I'd be more worried if there WEREN'T militia groups growing, what with NDAA, Diebold vote fraud, the War on Islam, drones and derivatives.

                                                                      • 21 votes
                                                                      #5 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 11:54 PM EST

                                                                      I can just see you and your buddies roaring off in your pickups with your deer rifles and an occasional AK47 sticking out the windows off to do battle against an unconstitutional federal government and coming up against the U.S. Army, Marines, Air Force, National Guard, and various police departments. You people are living in a fantasy world, more suitable to John Wayne movies.

                                                                      • 33 votes
                                                                      #5.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:38 AM EST

                                                                      Tell that to the taliban.

                                                                      • 13 votes
                                                                      #5.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:54 AM EST

                                                                      We held back on the taliban for fear of civilian casualties, in this war there are no civilians.

                                                                      • 5 votes
                                                                      #5.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:55 AM EST

                                                                      Wow Darrin LB, thanks for the insight. You gave away much.

                                                                      Expect the cheka on America soon.

                                                                      • 5 votes
                                                                      #5.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:07 AM EST

                                                                      " These men and women are the people's line of defense against an unconstitutional federal government."

                                                                      I am guessing you found the federal govt to be totally 'constitutional' when the supreme court appointed GW Bush as president even though he LOST the election. SO I think you need to re-write that as "unwhite federal government" . That will explain your position more clearly.

                                                                      • 22 votes
                                                                      #5.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:35 AM EST

                                                                      John Brown... You have a very odd notion of what constitutes a patriot. It certainly isn't some nutcase survivalist who's simple-minded reactionary viewpoints cause him to pick up a gun and play army man in the woods.

                                                                      • 24 votes
                                                                      #5.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:36 AM EST

                                                                      The story is quick to paint these men and women as right wingers, when in reality, they are American patriots. These men and women are the people's line of defense against an unconstitutional federal government.

                                                                      You're not going to find a single "leftist" or even "centrist moderate" among that militia bunch, that leaves only "right wingers". To be sure, not all right-wingers are paranoid anti-government types, some truly do love their country and know their Constitution.

                                                                      These militia types aren't defending the Constitution, most have never read it or understood it's principles. The very fact that they're wanting to ignore, defy, or overthrow the Federal Government (set up by the Constitution and run on Constitutional principles) proves it.

                                                                      Calling the Federal Government"unconstitutional" without giving any indication as to how it supposedly violates the Constitution is just plain silly.

                                                                      • 21 votes
                                                                      #5.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:50 AM EST

                                                                      The founding fathers said that the final purpose of the 2nd amendment was for the citizens to protect themselves against the government. This stuff didn't start with Obama it has nothing to do with the color of his skin. It started under Bush and the Patriot Act. It started when we began having "enhanced interogation" on people who weren't even charged with a crime. It started when we decided that being labeled a "terrorist" meant you didnt have any rights anymore, regardless of the fact that now the government can label anyone a terrorist without any real oversite. It continues under Obama now that we can KILL terrorists even if they are US CITIZENS. These groups are rightly getting scared of what the government is doing.

                                                                      @Darrin You say we held back on the Taliban for fear of hurting civilians, well if the US military starts operating inside this country to fight, basically EVERYONE will be a civilian. There's a reason we lost more people in the Civil War than EVERY OTHER WAR COMBINED. I certainly hope that we start to see reason and stop taking away peoples civil liberties, and rebellion is absolutely the worst thing that can happen. But to say something like that makes me pretty away that you have no idea what war is like.

                                                                      @Mo-Mo Bush won the election. The only place that was contested seriously was Florida, EVERY SINGLE recount found that Bush was in the lead. Get over it, the supreme court followed the LAW by saying that Florida violated their own law. Plus to imply these people love Bush is just foolish because most of these groups no doubt HATE the policies he enacted (Patriot Act anyone?)

                                                                      @CM-6969 Most of these groups aren't calling for an overthrowing of the US government, doing so would be ILLEGAL and would result in them being arrested. If anything they are preparing just in case. There's good reason for this from George Bush to Barrack Obama the federal government has been massively expanding its power and scope. Case in point they can label you a terrorist and they have the "legal" right to hold you without a trial, without being charged with a crime, and subjected to "enhanced interogation methods." Even better Attorney General Hold didn't he just say it's LEGAL to TARGET AND KILL US citizens who are terrorists (im sorry ACCUSED of terrorism because it's susposed to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law).

                                                                      • 12 votes
                                                                      #5.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:23 AM EST

                                                                      There's a rotten peanut TeaNut in every garbage can. Shoot 'em up, Baggers!

                                                                      • 8 votes
                                                                      #5.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:09 AM EST

                                                                      So dudogger.. you do realize when you call someone a bagger that makes you the baggie.. right? The guy with nuts across his nose..

                                                                      Just saying.. You must like it.. you seem to call everyone a bagger.. so enjoy!

                                                                      • 7 votes
                                                                      #5.10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:37 AM EST

                                                                      Nice try, but not true. My husband's cousin is one of these people and he clings to Fox News like it's gospel straight out of the New Testament (which, to him, is as good as it gets). I think he misses Glenn Beck's face on his TV more than he misses his own grandmother who died two years ago. And by the way, he convinced my husband to spend thousands of dollars of OUR money on freeze-dried food, he is one of the people who supplies guns to Wal-Mart for these nutjobs to buy, and he never does a thing without checking the Bible first - particularly Leviticus, and he lives in the deep South. He is a walking stereotype, and sadly he thinks he's one of the smartest guys around.

                                                                      • 11 votes
                                                                      #5.11 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:48 AM EST

                                                                      Not that I care about WalMart, but they no longer sell firearms. You can buy BB and pellet guns and hollow point handgun ammo though.

                                                                        #5.12 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:19 AM EST

                                                                        ckelley116--with a little investigation of these groups i think we would find most of them receiving federal / state and local assistance for food / child care/ housing / heating and anything else they can free load off the government. i doubt they are getting school grants or loans. they call it ''bleeding the beast''-----a way of weakening the government. i wish they would go way into the woods and practice their survival skills--within a month they'd be back because they would miss their bar stools and walmart.

                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                        #5.13 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:23 AM EST

                                                                        Nothing says Christian like an AK47

                                                                        • 4 votes
                                                                        #5.14 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:28 AM EST

                                                                        ha ha dudogger likes getting tea bagged! Ha Ha

                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                        #5.15 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:39 AM EST

                                                                        kama - You're wrong about the 2000 election. Gore won, because he would have won Florida had the law been followed. The problem was SCOTUS ruled outside of established law. They had no precedent, and that's why they said their verdict could not be considered as precedent in the future.

                                                                        While the FL Supremes did in fact initially rule incorrectly (a limited recount violated equal justice for all Floridians), the law mandated that rather than SCOTUS halting the recount, the correct legal remedy was a full statewide recount. SCOTUS had no authority to halt the recount, only to mandate that every county had to be recounted.

                                                                        While several research orgs did in fact say that the limited recount would have favored W, they also found that under a statewide recount, Gore would have easily won by many thousands of votes. Al Gore was our first elected president who was not allowed to be inaugurated. The fool that was inaugurated in Jan 2001 ruined our country for decades to come.

                                                                        • 8 votes
                                                                        #5.16 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:54 AM EST

                                                                        Kama... You're exaggerating the purpose of the second amendment. It was not specifically for the purposes of protecting the people against the potential threat of government oppression or to overthrow the government. That is something Projected onto the reading or misreading of that text. It more likely served a young poor US government by giving it the ability to call up mliltias to preserve it rather than overthrow it.

                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                        #5.17 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:17 AM EST

                                                                        dudogger: There's a rotten peanut TeaNut in every garbage can. Shoot 'em up, Baggers!

                                                                        Texas84: So dudogger.. you do realize when you call someone a bagger that makes you the baggie.. right? The guy with nuts across his nose..

                                                                        ______________________________________________________________________

                                                                        No, Texas...that's really not how it works. Making a comment about something you've observed doesn't mean you were involved. But, then again, LOGIC really isn't one of those topics they teach in BuyBull Home Schooling, is it...

                                                                        Once again: all hat, no cattle...

                                                                        • 7 votes
                                                                        #5.18 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:41 AM EST

                                                                        For all who say only right wingers feel that their government is :1 actively attacking the constitution and 2 actively working to divide the people. I grew up a labor democrat now I would classify myself a slightly left leaning independent. I marched for civil rights and anti war in the 60's. But my government is attacking my first amendment rights. And my government is attacking my group of American citizens. So I won't go buy an AK47 but I'm not going to roll over either.

                                                                        • 5 votes
                                                                        #5.19 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:36 AM EST

                                                                        The meaning of the 2nd amendment has been interpreted in different ways, the most timely court ruling held individuals the right to keep arms. I would expect that right to be erroded over time, as rights are being eroded generally. Whether arms kept by individuals for self protection would be used against an individual, a group or an oppressive government who would pose a threat to their life or liberty, I would consider the right to keep arms an important freedom providing the individual's ability to protect themself, if in no other manner than to dissuade that oppression. If the government wages a war against the 2nd amendment to remove the right to keep arms from the People, or to confiscate their arms, it would signal an oppressive act. I fully expect that to happen and to happen soon, since the present administration has set about an escalated erosion of the rights of the People while at the same time having spoken in vague terms regarding the value of the 2nd amendment as a citizen right, as well as mentioned that if the government were to confiscate all of the guns from the People - after the fact - there may be grounds for Constitutional challenge. After the fact is an unsettling proposition. Obama quote in response to the question - What is your position on gun control? "I think that the 2nd amendment means something." (Obama places no verbal emphasis on the words 'mean' or 'something'). "I think that if the government were to confiscate everybodys guns unilaterally that it would be subject to Constitutional challenge." (the Constitutional challenge would come 'after' the confiscation). The People would then be able to go before the Supreme Court to challenge the government for their right to have their guns returned. Sure.

                                                                          #5.20 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:47 PM EST

                                                                          alim-2810059 - Can you give a tangible example of one of your rights that you feel is being eroded?

                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                          #5.21 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:00 PM EST

                                                                          Life LIBERTY and the pursuit of happiness. That is all that I am looking for . Obama and his cronies are trying to set up a welfare state were the government will see to the needs of the people. Well my friends I for one will take care of my own needs thru hardwork and a steadfast resolve to take care of my family. I believe that it was Ben Franklin who said something to the effect that if a man is willing to give up his liberty for protections he will soon have neither. So my advice to the 99 percent is to get off your rearends and get to the buisness of taking care of yourselfs. No free rides just the oppurtunity to get it on your own and the pride to no you did it yourself . Smaller govt. less restrictions on buisness and the right to make it in this country thru sweat and hard work. At last look I lived in the United States of America not the Socialist states of America. Give me liberty or give me death!

                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                          #5.22 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:38 PM EST

                                                                          Can you give a tangible example of one of your rights that you feel is being eroded?

                                                                          How about the PATRIOT Act? NDAA indefinite detention? Military drone surveillance before a crime is suspected or commited (unlike helicopters)? How about assasination of US citizens w/o so much as judge to square the evidence (if it exists)? How about warrantless wietaps? How about self written search warrants by federal agents (like English soldiers did during the Stamp Act)? How about TORTURE!? How about wars of aggression? How about extrotion (tax) on the threat of kidnapping (prison) just for living in a geographic gang turf (within borders) claimed by a mafia (state)? How about the upped ante in the drug war? How about a list of rights violated that both RepubliBloods and DemoCrips have been apart of, that I can list for HOURS?

                                                                          If none of that springs to your mind, then you're a nationalist....an anti-patriot.

                                                                          Here is how you know what tyranny is:

                                                                          If you have the mental and physical ability to govern yourself, then you have the right to govern yourself. If no others or their properties are harmed in that self governance, LOGICALLY all external compulsory government is tyrrany.

                                                                            #5.23 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:44 PM EST

                                                                            Just one tangible example, per your request.

                                                                            My son has been deployed for six and a half years and counting. I recognize that the Constitution requires a declaration of war - sticky little point of law - and that the oath is to defend this country, not our kingdom. I recognize the 'rights' being violated seem to impact him more than I or his wife and kids, but collateral damage comes in many forms. This is my 'one' tangible right subject to erosion that I would point to. Although I recognize it isn't just mine.

                                                                              #5.24 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:01 PM EST

                                                                              Everyone of those things you listed is a response by politicians to the will of the people which is always, always prone to the fear of exaggerated dangers. I.e. the Patriot Act would have and could have been stopped if the people had been reasonable enough to speak out when it was being passed, but instead the people didn't speak loudly enough because they wanted it. They wanted it because they let their fear of terrorism get exaggerated in their minds. Terrorism is less of a danger to an American citizen than murder at the hands of other Americans with guns....less dangerous than getting in your car and driving to work... Less dangerous even than eating dinner and potentially dying of food poisoning. But none of that matters. We Americans are always prone to streaks of unfounded fears. See McCarthyism. We as a population don't think; we react before we do and our politicians are a reflection of that. You can't blame them... The people vote for them.

                                                                                #5.25 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:02 PM EST

                                                                                "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice ". Barry Goldwater

                                                                                  #5.26 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:08 PM EST

                                                                                  Such a typical right-wing nutbag reply. "Obama has limited my right to buy guns. So, since he got elected, I've bought a whole truck-load of guns!!"

                                                                                  (eye roll)

                                                                                  You just can't fix stupid... What's even more impossible to fix is the Right's need to LIE in order to sell their crap.

                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                  #5.27 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:23 PM EST

                                                                                  Everyone of those things you listed is a response by politicians to the will of the people which is always, always prone to the fear of exaggerated dangers. I.e. the Patriot Act would have and could have been stopped if the people had been reasonable enough to speak out when it was being passed, but instead the people didn't speak loudly enough because they wanted it. They wanted it because they let their fear of terrorism get exaggerated in their minds. Terrorism is less of a danger to an American citizen than murder at the hands of other Americans with guns....less dangerous than getting in your car and driving to work... Less dangerous even than eating dinner and potentially dying of food poisoning. But none of that matters. We Americans are always prone to streaks of unfounded fears. See McCarthyism. We as a population don't think; we react before we do and our politicians are a reflection of that. You can't blame them... The people vote for them.

                                                                                  You're playing a semantical game of "ring around the rosie". You admit it's tyranny, just blame it on the voters and not the govt. Who the F cares? Tyranny is tyranny. I don't care if it's ad populum or ad antiquitum.

                                                                                  You admit it's tyranny...it happens to be (in your view) tyranny of the majority. So how does this excuse the tyranny?

                                                                                  Logically it doesn't.

                                                                                  Argumentum ad populum is an informal logical fallacy. Quit polling the lynch mob if the outcome is inevitably a lynching.

                                                                                    #5.28 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:55 PM EST

                                                                                    ProIndividual-3906907 - It's not that I am not admitting that tyranny is tyranny, but I am saying that any militia or rantings in this forum that are blaming some faceless 'government' are wrong. They should be pointing their fingers at each other instead. As I said...the people voted for those in power and those people are implementing the will of the majority. Sadly that is a very poorly thought out will.

                                                                                    Also, my argument is not an example of argumentum ad populum. It is exactly the opposite. I am not arguing that this tyranny is correct or that people are not right to be opposed to the tyranny of the majority. I am just simply stating that it is the majority's fault that they are in the situation they are in.

                                                                                    Argumentum ad populum would be if I were stating that it's not a tyranny since the majority is always right.

                                                                                      #5.29 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:17 PM EST

                                                                                      These knuckleheads are the future butchers of women and children. The very people that shout that democracy is being taken away from them.Cowards all of them.!!

                                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                                      #5.30 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:18 PM EST

                                                                                      ...."Can you give a tangible example of one of your rights that you feel is being eroded?"....

                                                                                      The right to be a selfish, bigoted, supremacist, intent on destroying the rights of everyone who isn't White-Male Centric.

                                                                                      Sorry. I thought I'd answer the question for the little bigot.

                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                      #5.31 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:08 PM EST

                                                                                      STMiller - No your wrong about the 2nd amendment, because Thomas Jefferson wrote letters and journals and said the exact same thing i said. PEOPLE WHO SIGNED THE CONSTITUTION AND WERE THERE FOR THE CREATION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT HAVE SAID IT WAS AND ENDSTOP FOR THE PEOPLE TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AGAINST THEIR GOVERNMENT. The founding fathers were like Christ time ago, there's still letters and journals written by these guys and what they though about it SHOULD be common knowledge.

                                                                                      Oh and for those who argued Bush WON THE ELECTION. The Supreme Court Ruled that Bush won because the state was trying to violate its own state laws. It's state law said that on a certain date the person who announces it would announce it and that would be the end of it. All the recounts never once ever had BUSH win EVER. I dont know where you get the idea that the recounts would have put Gore in the lead but that just isn't true the last closest recount put Gore about a hundred votes behind, but the supreme court said that the recounts weren't legal, because Florida law required the vote winner be announced and certified on the date listed by the person in the office who did so. That person announced Bush had won by the count, and thats why he became president.

                                                                                        #5.32 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:42 PM EST
                                                                                        Reply

                                                                                        God will lead them safely to jail!

                                                                                        • 21 votes
                                                                                        Reply#6 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 11:58 PM EST

                                                                                        One can hope. Yet, even that means taxpayers - you know the upper 48% who actually fund this country, once again pay for these guys. Bummer that the educated, employed and even busniess-owning women these ignorant douchebags hate are now becoming a significant percentage of taxpayers supporting these scum.

                                                                                        • 5 votes
                                                                                        #6.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:59 AM EST

                                                                                        Its implied, Rebel. It doesn't take a great leap of logic to make the connection between people like Rush and these paranoid and violent men.

                                                                                        Also, Rebel, why do you assume littlechanges is a 'sweetheart'. Would you say that to any burly guy who supports womens rights?

                                                                                        • 4 votes
                                                                                        #6.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:25 AM EST
                                                                                        Comment author avatarDMorganExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                                        Where does it have to say it, TNRebel? Rush (the Right Wing HERO) has already made it clear -- and, it was already clear before.

                                                                                        Your filthy goddam BuyBull also makes misogyny pretty clear, too...

                                                                                        • 5 votes
                                                                                        #6.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:51 AM EST

                                                                                        And when you run out of jail cells full of Americans who won't bow down then what do you do. Go ahead arrest me. Then my statement of conscience makes the national news everyday.Bring it on.

                                                                                          #6.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:45 AM EST

                                                                                          Having women members does not mean they are not woman haters. They like to keep some women around for doing those chores that are beneath a man. you know or to have someone to bang occasionally when the kegs are delivered.

                                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                                          #6.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:56 AM EST

                                                                                          And yes, it does take a leap to go from Militia member to women hating moron...

                                                                                          He wasn't making the leap from "militia member". He was making the leap from "right-wing white christian male whack-job" -- which is no leap. And, which this country is full of...

                                                                                          Rush is a fat hate spewing misogynist

                                                                                          And he is one of the highest paid right-wing propaganda machines -- the right-wing's Hero and Mouthpiece. Why do you think that recently all the leadership of the GOP had to speak out against what he said? Because they know, the rest of the time, he is spewing their agenda to anyone who will listen. Just as he did this time, he just didn't choose very good verbiage for his hate speech...

                                                                                          Funny thing is, you want to lump everyone you disagree with in one category.

                                                                                          christ on a soggy bicuit! I don't need to lump these whack-jobs (who you saddle-up with) into one category! you guys do that all on your own WITHOUT my help or anyone else's!!

                                                                                          Oh yes, DMorgan, I never mentioned the bible...

                                                                                          LMFAO! You didn't need to! The mindlessness of your cultism is all over everything you write! And then, in the following sentences, you couldn't resist defending it -- so, my (well-fueled) assumptions were correct!

                                                                                          That's your hatred coming out, not mine...You may want to put some thought into why you hate it so much...

                                                                                          Calling it out for what it is -- a filthy book of mythological nonsense and self-important, self-righteous hatred -- is not hatred on my part, just honest observation. And, the reason I have that observation of its content is becasue I have studied it and manyother cult beliefs in my life. What I hate are those followers who use it to hate others. Who use it to fuel baseless, unreasonable discrimination against other Americans. Who think their cult beliefs MUST be legislated for everyone to follow because THEY cannot stand anyone who thinks differently, so their answer is to force that mindless dogma and neanderthal crap onto everyone by way of legislation.

                                                                                          Or not, I don't care if you want to go through life blindly thinking your views are superior to every ones...

                                                                                          Those who feel they must force their goddam cultism onto Everyone Else are the ones who think their way is the "superior way" and "only way" -- seems you have things reversed, li'l fella...

                                                                                          • 4 votes
                                                                                          #6.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:57 AM EST

                                                                                          It doesn't take a great leap of logic to make the connection between people like Rush and these paranoid and violent men.

                                                                                          Actually it takes a HUGE leap of logic...hence why you're not logical at all in your arguments. You have nationalist tendancies that lead to anti-patriotism. You suffer from the black and white fallacy of either/or, us/them. It's a symptom of psychosis (look it up).

                                                                                          Logical leaps like the one you're making is an inforaml logical fallacy and a propaganda model (guilt by association).

                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                          #6.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:49 PM EST

                                                                                          TNRebel: LOL...You sound just like the Baptist preacher that turned me away from organized religion in the first place...Such hatred and unwillingness to see alternative view points...

                                                                                          Oh, no worries. I have no problem seeing them, hearing them, or reading them. It's impossible to NOT see the hate-speech and continual discrimination practiced by the Religious Reich That hate-speech is everywhere. I stand by my choice to discount or disregard that hate-speech as a very moral position.

                                                                                          If there is after life, you may want to think before you speak...But, your right as well, there may not be...

                                                                                          jesus h nipple. Why do you CONTINUALLY have such a strong need to LIE and misrepresent what people say here? Is that the only way you can salvage your lame arguments? make things up about what other people say, and then defend your make-believe comments?? where did I say ANYWHERE that there is no afterlife? Talk about BLACK AND WHITE and JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS... These rabid right-wing whack-jobs hear anyone discount the BuyBull as an unprovable cult book, suddenly they must not believe in an afterlife!! ROFLMFAO! There have been, currently and through history, over 3000 different cults and gods worshiped. But WHOA! Discount the BuyBull, and that's it! They conclude that you've turned your back on everything! LOL!!

                                                                                          It pleases me to think there is, and that's my right, as it is everyone else...

                                                                                          Who ever said it wasn't your right to believe in cultism or an after life? You can believe in Harry Potter or scientology for all i care. I never said it wasn't your right. Religious Freedom is the right of every citizen in the US.

                                                                                          The mindlessness of my cultism is all over everything I write??

                                                                                          Yes, it is. Are you ashamed of that?

                                                                                          ..So is your hatred...

                                                                                          I have admitted that I detest hate-groups, and people who use their cultism to discriminate against other Americans... I have no problem admitting to that. This article is about these hate groups. Did you miss that little tidbit?

                                                                                          I belong to no cult by the way...:)..I don't go to church..Ha ha.....LOL...

                                                                                          Cultism isn't defined by going to church. Ha ha.....LOL....

                                                                                          And in closing if you think white Christian males hate women, it did mention other groups in the article, guess they all hate women too..Is that the rational were using??..

                                                                                          The word is rationale -- rational (what you wrote) is something you clearly know very little about.

                                                                                          I would say peace be with you, but you don't believe in that so..have a great day..:)

                                                                                          Let's see -- I oppose armed hate-groups and religious-based discrimination and hatred. Therefore, I don't believe in Peace now... Once again, you show how logic, reason and rational/critical thought are skills you do not employ. But -- as for the "great day" -- thank you. I am having a great day; very sunny, too, in fact.

                                                                                          Cheers!

                                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                                          #6.11 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:44 PM EST

                                                                                          Hand 'em their arses, DMorgan!

                                                                                          Enjoying it!

                                                                                          Pass the popcorn, please.

                                                                                          Lol.

                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                          #6.12 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:06 PM EST

                                                                                          Having read most of these comments I have to admit I find Morgans to be the most abrasive of any ones.

                                                                                          So whatever he is promoting I tend to treat with cautious pessimism.

                                                                                            #6.13 - Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:11 PM EDT
                                                                                            Reply

                                                                                            These are the same cowards who love to play army in their rural backyards, pretending to be heroes for whatever hair brained, racist cause they can think of yet they always seem to be unavailable for actual duty in the U.S. armed services - most probably because they were rejected and deemed unacceptable by those same services because of their psychotic tendencies or were not man or woman enough to sign up for real military duty . And of course not a peep from the NRA and it's minions about the danger of allowing these would be criminals access to any and all types of weaponry.

                                                                                            • 44 votes
                                                                                            #7 - Wed Mar 7, 2012 11:58 PM EST

                                                                                            sounds like you dont like the 2nd amendment too much.

                                                                                            how would you stop americans, law abiding citizens, from getting a gun ?

                                                                                            • 20 votes
                                                                                            #7.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:25 AM EST

                                                                                            The exercise of one amendment cannot be used to infringe upon another.

                                                                                            Try telling that to the NRA, though, and their patriotically ignorant and proud, "sovereign citizens," will tell you that "God And Guns," trumps all other amendments in the U.S. Constitution, including, your Freedom of Speech as well as this article's Freedom of the Press. (Of course, only their freedom of speech and their freedom of the press matters when it's convenient to arbitrarily defend themselves from accusations of using violent means to communicate their messages of intolerance and hate).

                                                                                            Not surprisingly, they also consider modern civil rights to be an invention of "liberals," "socialists," "communists," "mud people minorities," and "labor unions." Thus, as far as they're concerned, your civil rights aren't valued, and it's only theirs, that has any cultural value.

                                                                                            • 30 votes
                                                                                            #7.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:37 AM EST

                                                                                            You can't tell these liberals anything. They want the government to watch everyone why? The truth be known they're scared, of what I don't know. It seems like the time has come, to cull the herd of the ever growing population here in our country.

                                                                                            One poster stated that these militia's were just backyard soldiers, I know some and they are mostly all retired military, or, have served in some branch of the military. The ones that haven't served are being trained by; the ones that have.

                                                                                            With that being said I'm sure not all of them are stable and needs to be watched. Not by the government either, by the very ones training them. They will know whom is and is not worthy of being part of their group.

                                                                                            Let's get this party started and let the chips lay where they may fall.

                                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                                            #7.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:53 AM EST

                                                                                            The truth be known they're scared, of what I don't know.

                                                                                            In your next sentence

                                                                                            It seems like the time has come, to cull the herd of the ever growing population here in our country.

                                                                                            Seems like you answered your own question. In the back of every peaceful, loving 'liberal's mind is fear of you knuckle dragging Morlocks and your violent intentions. Your kind are no better then the Taliban.

                                                                                            • 3 votes
                                                                                            #7.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:32 AM EST

                                                                                            he's Retired military, and a member of Oath Keepers...

                                                                                            So, a complete right-wing religious whack-job. thanks for pointing that out.

                                                                                            • 4 votes
                                                                                            #7.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:55 AM EST

                                                                                            He doesn't like the first amendment unless he can use it to gag other americans or the tenth amendment either.rradiko it is not these people who are gutting the first amendment. It is the liberal government of the US that gives teenage kids gag orders and censors their speech.

                                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                                            #7.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:48 AM EST

                                                                                            Whatever TNR. I served in a different capacity. Retired after 32 years of urban police work -- 7 years in narcotics, 4 years in the gang unit, the rest of it on mtn-bikes in the central district (mostly drug enforcement). Been shot at three times, two of those three attempts almost killed me. And one member of my academy class, also in my gang unit, was killed while i was on-duty. My dad, however, served in WWII...so my family has its own legacy of military and non-civilian uniformed service.

                                                                                            Go blow your self-righteousness out your butt-end. You know NOTHING about me and my history. And that I don't follow your right-wing BS or believe in the hyporcritical, hate-filled religious crap that you do makes me one VERY PROUD American. I'm not interested in you conferderate-flag waving hate-mongers or the christian/religious-Reich nonsense you spew in order to try and legitimize why you claim to "love America" but clearly hate Americans.

                                                                                            Oh yes, thanks for pointing out your intolerance of any opposing views or thoughts..

                                                                                            Again, correction: my intolerance is for hate-mongering views and thoughts (which, yes, I admit -- I do OPPOSE them).

                                                                                            • 3 votes
                                                                                            #7.10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:08 PM EST

                                                                                            American liberty, including your freedom of speech was won with guns employed by those who risked their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor. The latter is something that these PC weenies at SPLC neither have nor know anything about.

                                                                                              #7.11 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:09 PM EST

                                                                                              Right. the SPLC knows nothing about religious-reich whack-groups like the KKK. Yeah. OK.

                                                                                              But, rick in cincinnati - he's the expert who works to take down hate groups all day long.

                                                                                              Yeah. OK...

                                                                                              Just a little refresher, in case you can't recall some of the well-known ideologies of the Klan. This is from their own propaganda, and website:

                                                                                              "Non-whites who reside in America should be expected to conduct themselves according to Christian principles and must recognize that race mixing is definitely wrong and out of the question. It will be a privilege to live under the authority of a compassionate White Christian government."
                                                                                              — The Knights of the Ku Klux Klan

                                                                                              Yeah. There's some more good christian values for ya!

                                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                                              #7.12 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:52 PM EST

                                                                                              dmorgan,you can join the muslim brotherhood for protection from the christians but when the revolution comes you better dig a deeper hole because your Allah will not save you, another thing dm,all christian are not white,they are black, asian,latino, indian,arab, ect, christians are scattered all over this world, so stop your idiotic B.S. comments on this site.

                                                                                                #7.13 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:41 PM EST

                                                                                                These are the same cowards who love to play army in their rural backyards, pretending to be heroes for whatever hair brained, racist cause they can think of yet they always seem to be unavailable for actual duty in the U.S. armed services

                                                                                                Response:

                                                                                                Oath Keepers are currennt or former military/law enforcement...many of which are veterans of foreign wars.

                                                                                                The illogical ad hominem repsonse back:

                                                                                                So, a complete right-wing religious whack-job. thanks for pointing that out.

                                                                                                So keeping your oath is now treason and whack-jobbery? And it necessitates being on one side of the other of your false political paradigm (anyone who thinks left and right exist is an idiot...it's a 2 dimensional political model for a 3 dimensional philosophical world)?

                                                                                                I guess War is Peace, Slavery is Freedom, Ignorance is Strength, Interventions are Humanitarian, Pepper Spray is a Vegetable...Orwell 2012!

                                                                                                My gosh, the world is a bunch of drooling boobs. No wonder we use agrumentum ad populum (the informal logical fallacy of appealing to polls, votes, and popularity) to organize society! Just keep polling that lynch mob and wondering why they keep voting for lynching.

                                                                                                Maybe, just maybe, you nationalists are anti-patriotic because you stand with a government against your country (the fellow citizens). Mark Twain (Samuel Clemons) said all there ever needs to be said about nationalism and patriotism:

                                                                                                "Patriotism is supporting your country all the
                                                                                                time
                                                                                                , and your government when it
                                                                                                deserves
                                                                                                it." --- Mark Twain

                                                                                                  #7.14 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:02 PM EST

                                                                                                  LOL...your first sentence as you try to attack me has to refer to a Religious Leader -- within a biblical religious order responsible for raping tens of thousands of children...

                                                                                                  ...funny how the BuyBull faiths are always the ones with the deepest, darkest crimes against mankind, and provide you with the knee-jerk fodder you use to try and insult others.

                                                                                                  i don't even need to reply. every time you speak, you show how hypocritical you are to your cult beliefs, and how unlike your jesus-myth you truly are (unless you think the jesus creature would behave and act like you people do)...

                                                                                                  if the mythical jesus were actually real, he'd be so upset with those who represent him that his crap would be runny for an eternity... but hey! whatever makes you seem cool in the moment, because that is what "christian values" are all about!

                                                                                                  Enjoy calling folks whackos and nut jobs, just don't get pissed when you get the same..

                                                                                                  I dont. I typically laugh at how easily and how often so-called christians abandon their so-called values and disrespect their own so-called "savior" (who would never behave as they do). They only show what low-life trash they can become without a second thought. It's really quite amusing.

                                                                                                    #7.16 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:56 PM EST

                                                                                                    Keck: ..."sounds like you dont like the 2nd amendment too much.

                                                                                                    how would you stop americans, law abiding citizens, from getting a gun?".....

                                                                                                    Hey, Keck! They're Latino American Muslims!

                                                                                                    Watch him squirm, heh, heh......

                                                                                                      #7.17 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:16 PM EST
                                                                                                      Reply

                                                                                                      The Constitution only involves "militias" in defense from a force outside of the legitimately elected government. Any use of the term "militia" that is outside of a force defending the legitimately elected government of the United States is a misuse of the term. The term "militia" does not refer to an assembly bent on the overthrow of the legitimately elected U.S. government, and any use of the term to refer to a group supporting the overthrow of the elected government is a misnomer, otherwise known as a lie.

                                                                                                      We citizens of the United States went to the election polls in 2008, as we did in 2000 and 2004, to determine who shall occupy the office of President of the United States. President Obama won that election in 2008 by a majority of the vote. He is our legitimate POTUS.

                                                                                                      • 32 votes
                                                                                                      #8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:07 AM EST

                                                                                                      U.S. Code and legislative history going back to 1775 recognize militia as one of the elements intended to defend the Constitution against the "unlawful" (i.e. unConstitutional) actions of government. Being a member of a militia is NOT unlawful. In fact, various states actually have a formal militia. See Tennessee, for one. And the militia is NOT the National Guard.

                                                                                                      USC § 311 - Militia: composition and classes

                                                                                                      (a)The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

                                                                                                      (b)The classes of the militia are—
                                                                                                      (1)the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
                                                                                                      (2)the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

                                                                                                      • 5 votes
                                                                                                      #8.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:29 AM EST

                                                                                                      TNRebel,

                                                                                                      It was definitely intended to be a final check and balance against a out of control Government

                                                                                                      So what constitutes an "out of control government"? These militias seem to fear the legal election of a president by the majority of voters to do the will of the People. Just because the People want something different than these loose cannons does NOT give them the right to commit an insurrection against a legitimately democratically elected government that is doing the will of the People. These militias are not made up of patriots. They're made up of anti-American extremists, with damn few differences separating them from terrorists plotting to do the US harm.

                                                                                                      That said, I always reserve judgement. It takes a truly sick person to commit violence against another person. So long as these folks believing they're holding the thin blue line without harming their fellow citizens, fine. Go nuts. Just remember that taking arms against your fellow citizens is criminal, not patriotic. Timothy McVeigh was no patriot and these militias will not be viewed as patriots if they take similar actions.

                                                                                                      • 4 votes
                                                                                                      #8.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:07 AM EST

                                                                                                      ?

                                                                                                        #8.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:45 AM EST

                                                                                                        Pragmatic said- "These militias seem to fear the legal election of a president by the majority of voters to do the will of the People." You seem to forget people say what they need to in order to get elected, then do what they really wanted to do in the first place. The increased gun sales sends a message to the govt and to the criminal that "We the People" aren't going to stand around while they steal us of our rights and possessions.

                                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                                        #8.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:57 AM EST

                                                                                                        So is the Texas militia, a seperate organization from the national guard, fully under the control of the governor not subject to call up nationally. Is that Ok for you? Or because we live in the south does that automatically make us nut jobs in your eyes. TNrebel you can add the federal judge in San Anotonio who thinks it is OK to give a citizen a list of 15 phrases he couldn't say in his graduation. Which included the ever so radical "may we please have a moment of silence". Think the government is becoming just a bit intrusive in our lives.

                                                                                                          #8.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:02 PM EST

                                                                                                          Yet, when Dumbya Bush (another texan hero) lied about WMD in Iraq and the made-up connection between Iraq and 9/11 to start a multi-Trillion-Dollar war against them (full of dark-skinned, non-christian savages, by the way...) ---- the self-righteous TNRebel and his concern about an "out-of-control-government" was nowhere to be found. instead, people like that spent more time sitting in the corner rubbing peanut-butter all over their groin, watching re-runs of "shock and awe" and the "mission accomplished" moments of that goddam texas moron in the white house. who, by the way, gave a New Meaning to "out of control government" when he drove this country right into a cesspool. let's not forget how daddy-Bush, along with Reagan and Rumsfeld, propped-up Saddam Hussein in the first place!!

                                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                                          #8.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:02 PM EST

                                                                                                          Pick and choose my friend, there are plenty of examples to choose from...:)

                                                                                                          And every single one could be solved if people voted smarter. We get the government we elect. Any insurrection against a legitimately elected government doing the will of the People subverts the democratic process and is anti-American. The guns only need to come out when we get a government we didn't elect. See Russia as an example of this. I do my part going on here and reminding people that as long as they allow themselves to be distracted by stupid wedge issues like contraception, big issues that impact the future of the nation are kicked down the road. We can have these debates when we take care of the important now issues.

                                                                                                          And Timothy McVeigh, see my post 1.90...Inside job...

                                                                                                          It doesn't matter, my point is still valid. The narrative told was a man who didn't like the government, was staunchly anti-tax and pro-rights, and sought to stop the government from abusing its citizens by inspiring a revolt. The actions he (allegedly) took were perceived by the vast majority of Americans as criminal, not patriotic. Any militia taking war-like actions against a government legitimately elected will face a similar perception by the majority of Americans. They will be branded as anti-American terrorists.

                                                                                                          Mom90210,

                                                                                                          You seem to forget people say what they need to in order to get elected, then do what they really wanted to do in the first place. The increased gun sales sends a message to the govt and to the criminal that "We the People" aren't going to stand around while they steal us of our rights and possessions.

                                                                                                          I assume we're all not stupid here. When you know a politician is just telling you what you want to hear, don't vote for them. Vote for honest people. I predict Mitt Romney will be the Republican nominee. And when he is, republicans will vote for him because he's "not Obama" despite the fact that he clearly says and does whatever it takes to be elected. I know it's true. He was a different politician when he was governor. He fit the mold for Massachusetts politics to get elected. Here's my question for you: Will you vote for the "not Obama" candidate come November, even if you know he's just telling you whatever you want to hear to get elected?

                                                                                                          Buying firearms won't stop the parade of fools known as Washington from stealing our rights and possessions, they've been doing that on a regular basis for the past 235 and a half years. You need to get out and you need to vote. You need to vote for the guy or gal who does the right thing because it is the right to do, not because it motivates your ideology, not because it blocks somebody else from office, not because they support a single issue you support, not because they spent the most money, not because they look nice, not because they are a member of your political party, and not because they throw you a bone once in a while to placate you.

                                                                                                          We get the government we elect. America makes the choice. And so long as America thinks that the only choice for politicians is between two parties (who only differ just enough to make people surrender their ability to reason), nothing will change. Get out and vote. It's non-violent, it sends a message, and it's your God-given right!

                                                                                                            #8.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:10 PM EST

                                                                                                            The Constitution only involves "militias" in defense from a force outside of the legitimately elected government.

                                                                                                            The Constituion says no such thing, nor does any of the State ratifying Conventions, nor does any published or unpublished writings of any of the founders that can be construed as original intent.

                                                                                                            "Legitimate" is in the eye of the beholder...as elections can be (and are) fixed in this country.

                                                                                                            Besides, elections are argumentum ad populum, an informal logical fallacy appealling to polls, votes, and popularity. It's irrelevant to whether or not someone's rights are violated. We can elect Hitler, and we can vote to murder all left handed people...that hardly makes either legitmate, logically.

                                                                                                            Someone needs a philosophy instead of an ideology. That someone is you.

                                                                                                              #8.10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:10 PM EST

                                                                                                              see people the problem is rightwing racist idiots like mr. TNReble who are missing a few screws and are willing to do or say anything that the rightwingnuts put out there for them to feed on. if you`ve noticed the number of groups go down when theres a republican president. this country is filled with rightwinged racist bible toting exstreamest idiot hate groups that the right stirs up every election to get them to vote against thier own best intrest and the sad part is it works. I`ve never in my life thought i would see the right go to such a level of disrespect that they have shown this president its f@#@#@# dispicable and they call themselves americans. the right has done nothing to help this country except to instill fear and spread BS lies just like they always do. you people say that Obama is taking your freedoms away well you brainwashed idiots better get your heads out of your ass`es and look around cus your party started the patriot act, 2 wars, colasped the economy, bailed out wallstreet, killed the middleclass, made 400 people as richer then the bottom 150,000,000 people, killing collective bargining, killing education, killing womens rights just to nam a few. you got the rightwing exstreamest tea party created and funded by the koch brothers and karl rove trying to get rid of all regulations and this president and take what evers left of our resources and freedoms. look who voted for mitt the very rich and look who voted for rick the very exstream racist rightwing bible thumpping nuts in this country that want to take us back to the 14th century. 2010 we saw people getting beatin up at TP rallys we saw the country down graded and almost shut down, people kicked out of thier homes, more filabusters then there were in the past 200 yrs, tryed to make MC a voucher program, cut SS and MC, give more tax breaks to the rich, did nothing to create jobs, instead made it thier number one priorty to defeat this president at all cost and i could go on for ever. and to think that you idiots still think that your party is out to take care of you. you are nothing but a blind brainwashed idiot that your party created to do thier dirty work and thats all you`ll ever be nothinh but a useless follower until you WTFUP! sad but very true and who you think started the spying on you dumbass it was your beloved BUSH!

                                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                                              #8.11 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:22 PM EST

                                                                                                              LMAO! I knew this one would try and suggest he fought in the military... and in Iraq, no less. The only way he can hide behind a screen and try to garner any sort of credibility at all...since he is a coward to his own stated faith/values, and cannot stick to those.... let's pretend to be a soldier now, and see where that gets you.

                                                                                                              (yawn)

                                                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                                                              #8.14 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:04 PM EST

                                                                                                              LOL! Wow, you hate the police, too! Figures...

                                                                                                              No doubt -- with every post, you sound like a die-hard christian.

                                                                                                              Keep hidin behind your screen, punkin!!

                                                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                                                              #8.16 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:43 PM EST
                                                                                                              Reply

                                                                                                              Is the "Occupier" Movement on their list?

                                                                                                              Five million dollars in costs to the city of Oakland.

                                                                                                              Burning the Flag of the United States of America on the Steps of City hall that they stole from Oakland City Hall after they broke in.

                                                                                                              Performing economic terrorism by shutting down ports, blocking streets preventing people from getting to/from work.

                                                                                                              Destroying public and private property and the damage to state, city, and federal parks. Using the Statue of James McPherson in Washington DC's McPherson park as a tent Pole and Putting an English Terrorist facsimile, a Guy Fawkes mask, on the statue.

                                                                                                              Breaking into privately owned property and trying to "Occupy" it which is trespassing.

                                                                                                              Holding F the Police rallies.

                                                                                                              Showing up at "peaceful" rallies with riot shields with the Anarchy symbol on them, corrugated metal barriers, and gas masks.

                                                                                                              Defiling churches that were kind enough to let them stay there.

                                                                                                              Racist, anti-Semitic, pledge of allegiance.

                                                                                                              http://conservativehideout.com/2012/01/31/story-update-occupy-oaklands-anti-semitic-pledge-and-msm-ignores-flag-burning/

                                                                                                              “I pledge allegiance to a flag of the imperialistic, capitalistic dictatorship. And to the plutocracy for which it stands, privately owned central bank, under the Jews. With inequality and injustice for the 99.”

                                                                                                              Not a single peep from the Democrats.

                                                                                                              • 20 votes
                                                                                                              Reply#9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:07 AM EST

                                                                                                              no they did "peep".

                                                                                                              nacy pelosi and obama are proud of the occupiers.

                                                                                                              • 18 votes
                                                                                                              #9.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:22 AM EST

                                                                                                              Hey DeMerl, I have a fabulous idea. Why don't you go find one of these groups and personally tell them what cowards they are? Oh, and please let us all know how it all turns out.

                                                                                                              • 21 votes
                                                                                                              #9.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:22 AM EST

                                                                                                              Hey Spider, I have a brother that is part of these groups. He is a right-wing fanatical coward. I tell him all the time. I really feel bad for people like that because they have a serious mental condition that controls their lives. They are not "real" Americans because real Americans, like our founding fathers, agreed to a peaceful transition of leadership. Up until Bush's presidency, we had little of what was going on now. The Conservatives are poisoning the simple minded minions that are "the Patriot Militias". They should get over it and realize that they are the minority. Obama won the election and all the Conservative racists out their are just poor loser's. Ya, I'm a progressive and proud of it. I served my nation in the service and am proud of that too. You don't have to be a mindless Conservative to be a "true" Patriot.

                                                                                                              • 25 votes
                                                                                                              #9.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:14 AM EST

                                                                                                              Thank you for your service for our country, John T.

                                                                                                              Thank you also for your SPOT ON! post.

                                                                                                              • 10 votes
                                                                                                              #9.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:20 AM EST

                                                                                                              Thanks John T. You are right on. Agreed, there are so many folks that hate the fact we have a black president, although, no one would ever say that, except the Aryan nation folks. What happened to compassion in this world. Seems it has been lost.

                                                                                                              • 4 votes
                                                                                                              #9.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:26 AM EST

                                                                                                              My father, my three uncles, my cousin and my nephew all served our country too. That doesn't stop this administration from attacking us and violating our civil rights. I couldn't by 22 I had a heart murmer and blood clots in my legs. DiverDown I wouldn't care if the president was purple with pink polka dots I was a member of the NAACP in the late 60's and my family could check every box on the census form if we wanted to. I still think his administration is attacking MY civil rights.

                                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                                              #9.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:10 PM EST
                                                                                                              Reply

                                                                                                              this is a strange article.

                                                                                                              ....where are these "300,000" americans who apparently want to overthrow the government ?

                                                                                                              the last several attacks on government officials have been radical left wing, jared loughner....and islamic radicals.

                                                                                                              why would msnbc put this story out tonight ?

                                                                                                              .....is this supposed to counter the video of obama from his college days as a radical leftist that was released tonight by breitbarts web site ?

                                                                                                              i wonder if the souther poverty law center counts the weather underground, and bill ayers convicted bomb maker and obamas mentor...

                                                                                                              there is no doubt that obama has been the best gun salesmen in the history of guns, or salesmen....but tying americans that exercise their right as an american to bear arms.....and calling citizens "militia" ?

                                                                                                              .

                                                                                                              this article placement is curious.

                                                                                                              why now ?

                                                                                                              what is going to happen tomorrow...

                                                                                                              • 21 votes
                                                                                                              Reply#10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:17 AM EST

                                                                                                              The police were at their range 1/2 mile from my house today, test firing their M16A2's on the 3-round burst setting.

                                                                                                              This is the first time I've heard assault rifle fire coming from there.

                                                                                                              Coincidence?

                                                                                                              • 10 votes
                                                                                                              #10.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:30 AM EST

                                                                                                              They were practicing blasting TeaDucks in a barrel.

                                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                                              #10.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:13 AM EST

                                                                                                              Keck-I watched the video and there is nothing there but the demonstration of Obama's skills as a speaker and future leader. Harvard Law School-can you say 1%? There is no left and no right-only different financial interests.

                                                                                                              • 6 votes
                                                                                                              #10.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:49 AM EST

                                                                                                              ....is this supposed to counter the video of obama from his college days as a radical leftist that was released tonight by breitbarts web site ?

                                                                                                              Did you even watch the video? He came out to support a tenured professor at Harvard who was calling for more minority representation in the faculty. Oh yeah, wow. That is terribly leftist and radical.

                                                                                                              Good ole Fox Noise. They can tell you folks anything and you'll believe it.

                                                                                                              • 9 votes
                                                                                                              #10.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:04 AM EST

                                                                                                              I watched the video on hannity. There is nothing there. It's the economy stupid. No independent or moderate will change their vote based on that video. Find real numbers on the economy.

                                                                                                              • 3 votes
                                                                                                              #10.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:39 AM EST

                                                                                                              no. obamas connection with leftist radicals is what will be exposed.

                                                                                                              and its about time we see this support of radical leftist ideals....we now know why van jones was fired so quickly.

                                                                                                              but for america to understand having a terrorist as your mentor, well they might think differently than sotero.obama

                                                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                                                              #10.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:59 PM EST

                                                                                                              Keck: ..."well they might think differently than sotero.obama"...

                                                                                                              Are you aware that the "sotero" thing was an article by the Onion Magazine?

                                                                                                              It was intended to mock stupid republicans.

                                                                                                              Enter you, Keck - quoting from a satirical rag.

                                                                                                              You're a riot, dude.

                                                                                                              Just slink away before anybody notices.

                                                                                                                #10.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:14 PM EST

                                                                                                                Shut the Keck up.

                                                                                                                  #10.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:15 PM EST

                                                                                                                  TNRebel: Your so much smarter then us bumpkins...:)

                                                                                                                  I think you're right, there... Especially when you consider that each time you say something like this, you use the word your instead of you're. And us instead of we. So yes -- smarter isn't a bad thing, ya know?

                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                  #10.10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:19 PM EST
                                                                                                                  Reply
                                                                                                                  Comment author avatarEd-418360Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                                                                  All you libbies are terrified- no guts- you guys are the first to hide under the stand- face it- No guts.

                                                                                                                  • 12 votes
                                                                                                                  Reply#11 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:17 AM EST

                                                                                                                  Keep telling yourself that Ed

                                                                                                                  • 20 votes
                                                                                                                  #11.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:37 AM EST

                                                                                                                  What a high-intelligence comment, Ed. Yer TeaMommy must be right proud!

                                                                                                                  • 6 votes
                                                                                                                  #11.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:14 AM EST

                                                                                                                  Hey dudogger what's up man? Hey I know the the libs usually try to service their fellow man, so I don't know what these guys are talking about.

                                                                                                                    #11.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:07 AM EST

                                                                                                                    Terrified? Sure. Plenty of reason. No guts? Not so much.

                                                                                                                      #11.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:49 AM EST

                                                                                                                      And you think your comments are smart DuDugger? You are the same kind of left side version of what is wrong with this country. Let's not speak to the issues just namecall MLK would be ashamed of you.

                                                                                                                        #11.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:18 PM EST

                                                                                                                        hey ed i think that you mean those rich rightwing scumbag draft dodgers that you chicken @!$%# brainwashed rightwing war mongers that you have in your party. if they ain`t using fear or god or spining BS lies as thier motive to get you idiots to vote for them then they wouldn`t have anything to run on.

                                                                                                                          #11.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:25 PM EST
                                                                                                                          Reply

                                                                                                                          this article reeks of 'chrystilnacht like' propaganda.

                                                                                                                          ...form the obama administration.

                                                                                                                          • 13 votes
                                                                                                                          Reply#12 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:23 AM EST

                                                                                                                          form?

                                                                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                                                                          #12.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:15 AM EST

                                                                                                                          @ keck: Very true...

                                                                                                                          Plus, they attempt to lend legitimacy to the bottom-feeders of the SPLC. (SPLC are the real terrorists) Research the term 'Fusion Centers.' You can thank (hate) the SPLC for them. This MSN article is gourmet food for the idiotic, typical, passive, lazy 'PC' average American. Americans are the most TOLERANT people on the face of the earth, they'll tolerate a media (like MSN) that puts out disinfo like this, to assist the USA Inc. in the 'Divide and Conquer' tactic. Answer? Ignore the media and don't believe a word they say. You will have a much happier existence and be free from their brainwashing / programming. John Adams quote "The Universality of the Militia must be maintained." (versus "select militia"; i.e. Army, Navy, Police)

                                                                                                                            #12.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:43 PM EST
                                                                                                                            Reply

                                                                                                                            How does anyone think Obama is a socialist? He is a capitalist ALL THE WAY to the bank(s). And 755% increase in militia groups since 2008? That's just nuts. I am very interested in all the possibilities for what causes such a need to organize anti-government groups. Racism and the economic instability are the obvious reasons, but it would be interesting to go more in-depth. I would love to read more about this. Any recommendations?

                                                                                                                            I think survivalists and extreme militia people all suffer from a serious anxiety disorder, after all, the definition of anxiety is "fear of impending doom". A civil war is coming, if Obama gets voted again? Please. No one has a crystal ball like that, and only someone with very unhealthy and totally distorted thinking would avow such certainty in an grim future made of pure conjecture. In fact, statistically speaking, these adamant fortune tellers will most likely die of cardiovascular disease long before they use their arsenals and all their stock-piled goods. I absolutely support being prepared, cautious and educated, but being paranoid is very unhealthy for everyone. As much as I think militant groups are perpetuated by ignorance, I also feel sad for them and their families-the anger, the paranoia, the waste of money, the hostility, the isolation, the fear, the risk of jail, the sharing of mis-information, etc etc. They are pretty sad and completely worthless hate machines.

                                                                                                                            • 19 votes
                                                                                                                            #13 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:27 AM EST

                                                                                                                            try researching "the weather underground"

                                                                                                                            • 15 votes
                                                                                                                            #13.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:34 AM EST

                                                                                                                            You are in a time warp. They haven't been around for years.

                                                                                                                            • 16 votes
                                                                                                                            #13.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:40 AM EST

                                                                                                                            so ?

                                                                                                                            ...they are a great source for researching domestic terror groups

                                                                                                                            • 9 votes
                                                                                                                            #13.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:42 AM EST

                                                                                                                            Reason for forming militias:

                                                                                                                            defense of their community from an outside assault.

                                                                                                                            Don't think it cannot happen here.

                                                                                                                            • 11 votes
                                                                                                                            #13.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:34 AM EST

                                                                                                                            Just remember y'all, that ignorance is militia spelled backwards.

                                                                                                                            • 10 votes
                                                                                                                            #13.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:09 AM EST

                                                                                                                            Capitalists don't want to redistribute income, but socialist do. Maybe that would be a good place to start.You could follow that up with considering ObamaCare - straightforward socialized medicine. Next, you might want to think about Obama's pride in being the Food Stamp president - free food, there's a capitalist concept (not). From there, you could progress to his remarks about much being required from those to whom much has been given. The guy is a Chicago pol thug community organizer - socialist to the core. However, he doesn't seem to mind benefitting from the capitalist system.

                                                                                                                            • 9 votes
                                                                                                                            #13.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:10 AM EST

                                                                                                                            It is time for everybody with ability to hide their abilities and become very very needy. Then, when nothing is being produced anymore, and there is nothing left to redistribute, drag out your abilities when the beg you to do so and pay you handsomely for it. But for now, all they want to do is penalize ability and reward need --- so it is time to be needy.

                                                                                                                            • 5 votes
                                                                                                                            #13.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:15 AM EST

                                                                                                                            try researching "the weather underground"

                                                                                                                            You try researching them. They could not be farther from "militia".

                                                                                                                            They were fighting the government to protest a war.

                                                                                                                            • 4 votes
                                                                                                                            #13.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:06 AM EST

                                                                                                                            TNRebel...One thing wrong with your bigoted post. The Crips and Bloods believe they are a militia. So those fat necked, fat gut country boi militias flying that rag Stars and Bars from their pickup with rifles aimed at law enforcement or anyone who disagrees with them are in the same league.

                                                                                                                            All those shaven-headed, fists pumping prove what? Try that up in the northeastern states and watch how fast those fat bois end up with an ass kicking or worse.

                                                                                                                            Furthermore, the Second Amendment for the "ignernt" gun runners and gun addicts has one little all too overlooked fact..."a well regulated militia"...check the facts. That "well regulated" according to our history books meant it was funded by taxpayers.

                                                                                                                            Who is funding these fat necked fat bois? oooooh...let's alllllll beeeee soooo skeeeeeeered....Here come day Stahs and Bahs. Grow some brains before you post bigotry.

                                                                                                                            • 2 votes
                                                                                                                            #13.10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:18 AM EST

                                                                                                                            They just are the extreme of what many people are feeling. Focus on the extremes and hope the ones not that extreme keep watching TV. Because if more people begin to feel like I do OWS will look like a kids party. We forced a sitting president to drop out of the election once before. You can't jail us all.

                                                                                                                              #13.12 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:23 PM EST

                                                                                                                              That flag you all get so upset about wasn't even the flag of the confederacy. You wouldn't recognize that flag if it was flying down the highway from me. Which by the way it is about 9 miles. Folow the line call eveybody you don't agree with names that won't make them go away. Today the flag you get so upset about in many sections of the populace nationwide means you have a rebel attitude. You won't follow just because the government or society tells you to. The patch I put together I was helped by a black guy to pick out the parts to put together including the battle flag. I have since renounced that total rebellion towards God and society. In otherwords I finally grew up.

                                                                                                                                #13.13 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:40 PM EST

                                                                                                                                @TNRebal4016842

                                                                                                                                Excellent depiction of what should have been. For a militia today to be under direct control of this government would be a treasonus act upon the people of this nation. Our governments have declared war on other nations as an uninvited police state since Korea. So have they really ever been the government our forefathers had in mind when forming the Constitution? The impeachment of this system of government is long overdue. It won't be done easily this is for sure.

                                                                                                                                Without a proper declaration from Congress. Dysfunctional then as now. As a "people" of "we the people" I take issue to having to be treated like a terrorist by TSA at the airport and now at a road block. Uninvited police action on me at the airport and no declaration of war on me, as I am no terrorist. If I was a Muslim teen our troops would be seen as a terrorist group and I for one don't want my kids to look like that around this world. Patriot Act, NDAA, Trespass Bill MY ASS. These people are doing this to thousands of people like me and my family. Have you ever heard of divide and conquer? That is what this is all about. Hind site is 20/20 now comes the brick wall. Get ready to be ready, it's commi'n.

                                                                                                                                  #13.15 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:26 PM EST

                                                                                                                                  Capitalists don't want to redistribute income, but socialist do. Maybe that would be a good place to start.

                                                                                                                                  So, I'm guessing you don't apply that to all the gov't handouts to farmers, veterans or churches... And i'm sure you NEVER deposit any of your money into banks insured by the FDIC. Right?

                                                                                                                                  You could follow that up with considering ObamaCare - straightforward socialized medicine.

                                                                                                                                  Unlike Medicare Medicaid which (i'm sure) NOBODY in your family has ever utilized... And never social security!! We should stick to a much better program - like leaving people uninsured so they walk into emergency rooms for care, for free, which hospitals must provide, and which ends up costing the taxpayers 10x as much.

                                                                                                                                  Next, you might want to think about Obama's pride in being the Food Stamp president - free food, there's a capitalist concept (not).

                                                                                                                                  Yes! Obama invented food stamps. I never heard of food stamps before Obama was elected. And republican right-wingers NEVER use food stamps or any other welfare!!

                                                                                                                                  Plus! The Bush Recession is Obama's fault, that's why more Americans need food!!

                                                                                                                                    #13.16 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:30 PM EST

                                                                                                                                    TNRebel: When people see Rebel, they immdeiately swing to racist...

                                                                                                                                    No, they think of a small-minded fellow with low self-esteem who gives himself some tough-sounding nickname in order to feel better about himself. It's your Little Man Syndrome showing itself again...

                                                                                                                                    Dude, you really should go back to being Mayor of Smallpenis, Wyoming... and leave these discussions to the rest of the folks, until you can come back and discuss/argue these kinds of topics without telling lies and tall tales. All the dishonesty and misrepresenting what others say/write doesn't impress anyone. You've lost any credibility here that you might have had otherwise.

                                                                                                                                    You should know by now -- if your argument has ANY merit at all, there's no need to tell lies.

                                                                                                                                    Cheers!

                                                                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                    #13.17 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:36 PM EST
                                                                                                                                    Reply

                                                                                                                                    Excuse me, but it is not the election and the economy that has led to the rise of these militias. It is the color of the president's skin. The rise of these white supremacy groups and gun sales kicked off the day Obama was elected.

                                                                                                                                    • 29 votes
                                                                                                                                    Reply#14 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:30 AM EST

                                                                                                                                    but the article said "black separatist groups" too.

                                                                                                                                    ...so black supremacy groups too, according to the article.

                                                                                                                                    • 14 votes
                                                                                                                                    #14.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:33 AM EST

                                                                                                                                    what evidence do you have that its the color of his skin jamie? is it simply because you assume that everyone who disagrees with you must be dumb, ignorant and racist, since you're so obviously smarter than everyone? and no they didnt kick off after Obama was elected, they kicked off around the time of waco and started accelerating after 9/11

                                                                                                                                    • 19 votes
                                                                                                                                    #14.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:18 AM EST

                                                                                                                                    Not so. When Reagan was in office, various militia often made the news. Though they started proliferating when Clinton took office, or rather after he'd been in long enough to show his true colors.

                                                                                                                                    And no, that was not in reference to his skin.

                                                                                                                                    Even Bush (the both of them) had militia following their actions.

                                                                                                                                    Of course, you wouldn't know that unless you go beyond the main stream media and do some research for yourself.

                                                                                                                                    • 11 votes
                                                                                                                                    #14.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:39 AM EST

                                                                                                                                    If ignorance is bliss, Jamie must be the most blissful person on the planet.

                                                                                                                                    • 9 votes
                                                                                                                                    #14.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:23 AM EST

                                                                                                                                    Jaime I could care less about his color I care that his administration is attacking my civil rights. But just keep swallowing that liberal BS right until those not armed are standing on the steps of every federal building in the US with signs.Then maybe you will get the point.

                                                                                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                    #14.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:29 PM EST

                                                                                                                                    Yeah. lonereb's "civil rights" are being attacked. right as we speak, no less!

                                                                                                                                    LOL!!

                                                                                                                                      #14.7 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 6:30 PM EST
                                                                                                                                      Reply

                                                                                                                                      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_terrorism

                                                                                                                                      The term economic terrorism is strictly defined to indicate an attempt at economic destabilization by a group. More precisely, in 2005 the Geneva Centre for Security Policy defined economic terrorism in the following terms:

                                                                                                                                      Contrary to "economic warfare" which is undertaken by states against other states, "economic terrorism" would be undertaken by transnational or non-state actors. This could entail varied, coordinated and sophisticated or massive destabilizing actions in order to disrupt the economic and financial stability of a state, a group of states or a society (such as market oriented western societies) for ideological or religious motives. These actions, if undertaken, may be violent or not. They could have either immediate effects or carry psychological effects which in turn have economic consequences.

                                                                                                                                      http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Occupy-Vote-Is-Economic-Violence-Jean-Quan-135502513.html

                                                                                                                                      Protesters voted to extend a blockade at the Port of Oakland through early Tuesday morning at Monday night's general assembly meeting.

                                                                                                                                      More than 100 dock workers were turned away Tuesday morning at 3 a.m. when their shifts were cancelled over safety concerns.

                                                                                                                                      All shifts were ordered back on by 7 a.m., according to the Oakland Port.

                                                                                                                                      "These disruptions cost workers shifts and wages, delaying and reducing paychecks," Robert Bernardo, the port's communications manager, said in a statement. "They also cost the port and City of Oakland vital resources. They hurt the many businesses that pay taxes and help us create jobs. These disruptions also distracted us from the productive work we need to be focused on to create more jobs and economic opportunities for the region."

                                                                                                                                      Mayor Jean Quan echoed those sentiments in a press conference late Monday night. She said this action was "economic violence" and not fair to port workers or the community.

                                                                                                                                      "I want to thank everyone for being peaceful today...but after the unofficial vote of the general assembly to continue the economic punishment of the Port of Oakland, I just have to say this -- while we have not had physical violence, the economic violence to this city is not fair."

                                                                                                                                      Perhaps hearing Quan's words or simply getting tired, a group of protesters left the picket line at 4 a.m. Tuesday.

                                                                                                                                      "The labor community has already said they do not support this and still a small group of people are going to hold this port, this city, this community hostage," Quan said.

                                                                                                                                      • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                      Reply#15 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:39 AM EST

                                                                                                                                      By your definition the 1% are the biggest economic terrorists of all. They acted together and collapsed the world economy through fraudelent and insane financial practices. Occupy Wall Street!

                                                                                                                                      • 22 votes
                                                                                                                                      #15.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:28 AM EST

                                                                                                                                      Yep and you keep voting for them. Democrats and Republicans. Do you honestly believe that Obama's 1 Billion dollar election war chest isn't coming with strings attached?

                                                                                                                                      • 12 votes
                                                                                                                                      #15.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:00 AM EST

                                                                                                                                      I love how you assume I support either party. I don't.

                                                                                                                                      • 6 votes
                                                                                                                                      #15.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:37 AM EST

                                                                                                                                      The 1% are just the scapegoats. The government caused this economic mess, and then blamed the 1% because they knew that envy and covetousness would prevail.

                                                                                                                                      • 8 votes
                                                                                                                                      #15.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:17 AM EST

                                                                                                                                      no, the 1% own/control the government

                                                                                                                                      • 4 votes
                                                                                                                                      #15.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:29 AM EST

                                                                                                                                      And if there was no state with it's monopoly on violence, law, money, geography, etc., what would the "1%" control then? NOTHING.

                                                                                                                                      The problem always reverts back to the state, as companies who control it are funded of our own free will (except where govt hands them favors).

                                                                                                                                      The lack of philosophical and economic understanding is staggering. This isn't a chicken and the egg argument.

                                                                                                                                        #15.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:43 PM EST
                                                                                                                                        Reply

                                                                                                                                        These area a bunch of gun toting fake ass weekend warriors with racial biases overtaking their common sense. Nothing patriotic about them or their ideals and threats.

                                                                                                                                        • 18 votes
                                                                                                                                        Reply#16 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:45 AM EST

                                                                                                                                        They are doing this to protect their families and communities from jack booted thugs like the ones that attacked John Singer and his family. Leave them alone, and you will never have a problem with them.

                                                                                                                                        • 10 votes
                                                                                                                                        #16.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:27 AM EST

                                                                                                                                        Protect their families... please. They are delusional, undereducated, geo-challenged, small-minded racists. It's really that simple. Believe me, I'll never have an issue with them because I would never live in communities that spew hate.

                                                                                                                                        • 7 votes
                                                                                                                                        #16.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:30 AM EST

                                                                                                                                        Frequent male Flyer

                                                                                                                                        "Believe me, I'll never have an issue with them because I would never live in communities that spew hate."

                                                                                                                                        "They are delusional, undereducated, geo-challenged, small-minded racists."

                                                                                                                                        just saying...sounds like you are spewing hate

                                                                                                                                        • 6 votes
                                                                                                                                        #16.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:56 AM EST

                                                                                                                                        Wow Flyer that seems like you are spewing some hate. Sheep like you crack me up. One day you just may be seeking safety from people like this.

                                                                                                                                        • 5 votes
                                                                                                                                        #16.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:11 AM EST

                                                                                                                                        I never saw so many collapsed comments...WTF?

                                                                                                                                          #16.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:27 AM EST

                                                                                                                                          But frequent male flyer You do live in just such a community. Your liberal supporters of Obama spew hate towards everyone that doesn't go along with their policies. I want to see the proof from the administration that the Vatican is involved in money-laundering. Your side put that out this morning.

                                                                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                          #16.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:50 PM EST

                                                                                                                                          The government is trying to dehumanize these people so they can justify attacking and killing them, and the liberal morons on this blog are going along with that. Time to take sides.

                                                                                                                                            #16.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:34 PM EST

                                                                                                                                            Black man supporting the report of a black controlled SPLC doesn't carry much weight. Smacks of racism just like the report.

                                                                                                                                              #16.9 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 3:21 PM EST

                                                                                                                                              FMF: "Believe me, I'll never have an issue with them because I would never live in communities that spew hate." "They are delusional, undereducated, geo-challenged, small-minded racists."

                                                                                                                                              Nanette: just saying...sounds like you are spewing hate

                                                                                                                                              DMorgan: Actually, Nanette, all he did was make an observation and repeat what he observed. That isn't hatred, it's just reporting back what he observed. So, chill out.

                                                                                                                                              Hate (in case you didn't know) is more like that moment, right after the 9/11 attacks, when hatemongers Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell raced to the nearest microphones and blamed the 9/11 attacks on gays and women/femenists. Or, Rush Limbaugh's recent right-wing, anti-female rants. hate is also the catholic cult priests who have raped tens of thousands of children, and then watching the cult protect the rapists and then, furthermore, watch the cult followers, even after it is all exposed, continue to send the cult leadership millions and millions of dollars to keep feeding the machine -- which, by the way, is still getting caught raping children!!

                                                                                                                                              I have many more examples. So, just an FYI -- these is a difference, Nanette.

                                                                                                                                                #16.10 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 6:39 PM EST
                                                                                                                                                Reply

                                                                                                                                                Groups like this have existed for quite some time, and as long as they are law-abiding they have the constitutional right to exist. However, I don't see this as much more than fearmongering,(Dare I say it?), from the liberal media. However, just to remind everyone; here is the oath that all of our military must take.
                                                                                                                                                "I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

                                                                                                                                                "I, ____— (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of ____— do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

                                                                                                                                                • 8 votes
                                                                                                                                                Reply#17 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:48 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                Capitalismkillsbirthrates, I would rather believe in God than believe in you.

                                                                                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                #17.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:25 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                So when defending the Constitution and obeying the president are mutually exclusive then what do you do?

                                                                                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                #17.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:57 PM EST
                                                                                                                                                Reply

                                                                                                                                                Nothing but contempt and scorn for these scumbags and wannabees. True "patriots" don't threaten people. True patriots don't settle things with a firearm. Government has it's evils and shortcomings, but at least it does have checks and balances to keep it on a leash, and we have a say, however small, in how tight we keep it. What about these guys? Who are THEY accountable to?

                                                                                                                                                • 31 votes
                                                                                                                                                Reply#19 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:54 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                Excellent points William. Well written and to the point.

                                                                                                                                                • 14 votes
                                                                                                                                                #19.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:13 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                Good thing you were not around Wm. Sanders in 1770's because under your theory George Washington and everyone fighting the British were not "true"patriots"". And who is the government accountable to, it is not the American people? How are they on a leash, definitely not with ethics or financially? People with many voices have been beaten down to much, whether they are African, Mexican, Asian, or European ethnicity, to believe in what the government has become.

                                                                                                                                                • 10 votes
                                                                                                                                                #19.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:38 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                Yes. Huntington. The Revolutionary War era is so applicable to 2012 United States. Why don't you draw a comparison to Braveheart while you're at it... geez.

                                                                                                                                                • 11 votes
                                                                                                                                                #19.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:27 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                WM these people will be held accountable to those who have more power then them. I would suggest you arm yourself. If you think the government can be everywhere when you need them think again. What these people prepare themselves for is when all order is broken down and nobody is there to stop them. Think about it. Every policeman and soldier will be home defending their families or organized to take control.

                                                                                                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                                #19.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:06 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                I stand by my statements, and my record speaks for itself...and at least I don't hide behind a keyboard playing Monday-morning patriot. For the record, the Founding Fathers wanted to AVOID war...they tried reconciliation instead of shooting first and asking questions later.

                                                                                                                                                Believe me, I have gripes against our government, but it is OUR government. You are able to post here, right? You can vote, right? I can assume you can take time out of your busy schedules to visit or write to your elected leaders, yes?

                                                                                                                                                Shooting first and asking questions later only creates more problems (think any nation in Africa or the Middle East). The merry-go-round of violence is endless. These countries have militias, and by and large I doubt you would feel very safe.

                                                                                                                                                And I find it insulting that anyone would compare these nobodies to our Founding Fathers...at least they had more intelligence and wit than these dim bulbs, and this was before the internet!

                                                                                                                                                • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                                #19.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:20 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                They can't help it William...They are clueless...but they are among a long, long line of those who have always predicted the near end of the US, because supposedly democracy can't possibly succeed. They're no different really than the terrorists who thought if they knocked down a few towers in NY and took out a piece of the Pentagon, America would collapse is panic. They're worse really, because how ignorant of this country do you have to be if you actually LIVE here? Freedom to them is supposed to be about who you keep OUT..who you marginalize...who you prevent from voting, who you control, who you take rights from. You can almost understand why these bottom dwellers are in a constant state of panic. It's not their country (never was, but they don't know that either.)

                                                                                                                                                • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                                #19.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:00 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                Well keep it tighter dude because this administration has violated two sections of the constitution and 4 of the 10 amendments of the bill of rights.Wm if you lived in Texas this year you would be wondering about that you can VOTE thing. Lets see our March 6th april 3rd april 17th May 29th (cross our fingers) primary. and we will have the municipal elections 1 week after everybodies terms of office run out ( cross the fingers again). I'm not so sure about that right to vote thing here.

                                                                                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                #19.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:12 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                Government has it's evils and shortcomings, but at least it does have checks and balances to keep it on a leash

                                                                                                                                                LOL @ your delusional statism.

                                                                                                                                                Boy, that state school curriculum sure did it's brainwashing job on you!

                                                                                                                                                Not very observant, are you?

                                                                                                                                                I suppose you still think the Pledge of Allegiance they say every morning in schools from 5 years old until you graduate high school is "for education"...lol. It's brainwashing, there is no other purpose. It makes children love the state (not the people). It was ILLEGAL to refuse to say it until the 1940s, even for religious reasons.

                                                                                                                                                I suppose you don't notice the govt funding of pro sports? A KID'S game!? Why? To bombard the masses, especially kids, with nationalist (not patriotic) images. How can we save our kids from this cult of death? They do this is in every state (compuslory govt) in the world.

                                                                                                                                                You are completely clueless.

                                                                                                                                                  #19.10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:26 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                  Boy, that state school curriculum sure did it's brainwashing job on you

                                                                                                                                                  It's better than the BuyBull-Home-Schooling that millions of idiot kids get these days...

                                                                                                                                                    #19.11 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 4:37 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                    TNRebel: Oh, and all those names you guys are throwing at militia members...Those words were used at one time to describe our Founding Fathers too...

                                                                                                                                                    Oh, yeah, there's a valid comparison. Our Founding Fathers... And, the modern day Religious Reich gun-nut whack-jobs whose lives mirror the Deliverance movie.

                                                                                                                                                    (eye roll)

                                                                                                                                                      #19.12 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 7:05 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                      Squeal like a pig, boy.

                                                                                                                                                        #19.13 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 7:12 PM EST
                                                                                                                                                        Reply

                                                                                                                                                        Isn't it funny how they are trying to make the word "Militia" have a negative connotation?

                                                                                                                                                        How about "Front" or "Liberation" or "Brotherhood"? Like the Animal Liberation Front, Earth Liberation front, Muslim Brother Hood, Palestinian Liberation Front, Black Liberation Front, United Freedom Front?

                                                                                                                                                        Instead of calling themselves a "Militia" they should just call themselves a "Liberation", or "Front", or "Brotherhood" then there wont be any problem with the Left?

                                                                                                                                                        Don't forget the new "Movement".

                                                                                                                                                        • 11 votes
                                                                                                                                                        Reply#20 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:57 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                        It's the actions of those groups, not their names, that produce the negative connotations. Being on the fringe, whether far left or far right, doesn't make them any more palatable, either.

                                                                                                                                                        • 8 votes
                                                                                                                                                        #20.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:00 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                        Im wondering what "actions" they have actually done? If they break the law fine arrest them. The majority of these groups aren't doing anything illegal or breaking the law.

                                                                                                                                                        • 9 votes
                                                                                                                                                        #20.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:02 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                        What is so flipping funny with most of those who "fear" the malitia is that the very word, malitia, is in the U.S. Constitution!

                                                                                                                                                        2nd amendment reads, "A well regulated malitia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

                                                                                                                                                        So, if a malitia is plotting terrorists acts, which involve killing of innocent life or breaking the law, they should be held accountable. However, if a mailtia is demonstrating their 2nd Amendment rights, preparing for what may happen, they have every right to do so.

                                                                                                                                                        We have to remember that our country, whether you like it or not, was founded and established by men & women such as these. Now, not all malitia are the same - just as not all soda pop is the same. You have different flavors - ideals - motivations for preparing.

                                                                                                                                                        It is the individuals responsibility to decide which one they want to associate themselves with. Either way, the majority of the those who are part of a mailitia believe that the U.S. Constitution is what makes America, America foundationally speaking. So any "mailitia" that leans toward anarchy as it's motivation is potentially dangerous.

                                                                                                                                                        This should not, however, be fodder to start making new gun control laws. Law abiding citizens will be stripped of their guns while law breaking criminals will still be armed and the potential threat of a tyranny of a socialist, Marxist, Moaist, facist or communist state could not be stopped as well.

                                                                                                                                                        You ask what is so bad about those states of living? Ask the over 1 million people murdered under Mao. Ask the millions of Jews who were murdered under Hitlers facist/socialist regime. Ask the hundreds of thousands who starved to death and/or resorted to cannibalism to survive under Stalin's Communist regime. In every case - EVERY CASE above, the people were unarmed. They could not defend against evil.

                                                                                                                                                        • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                                        #20.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:12 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                        I'm a registered democrat and self proclaimed liberal. I have a problem with the violent acts of each and every organization you just named. Violence is violence no matter what the color of skin on the perpetrator. Too bad you can't recognize the same. Amazing how none of these people had a problem when Bush and his cronies passed the Patriot Act and deregulated industry allowing them to send our jobs overseas. Somehow it wasn't a problem until a black man took office. Remember, just because we are liberals, it doesn't mean we don't own guns as well!

                                                                                                                                                        • 7 votes
                                                                                                                                                        #20.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:27 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                        @ kama, "... If they break the law fine arrest them"

                                                                                                                                                        What about those in our government that have not only broken our laws (Remember that the US Constitution is the Supreme Law of this land and EVERY law, bill, amendment, executive order must be constitutional or strengthen a natural right or a put a stronger limit our federal government and that is all they can do), but also gone against the way OUR government is required to operate?

                                                                                                                                                        About 25 - 30% of us have been calling for their arrests.

                                                                                                                                                        @ Machinehead - "They are manipulated and conditioned by the mass (leftist) media to believe that government is the answer to all problems, and so must be given all the power, funding, and legal authority to force the people to fall in line"

                                                                                                                                                        Those who serve within our federal government cannot legally, constitutionally take more power for themselves, and "We the People", nor the states gave them more power. To do so is an attack upon us by domestic enemies. ("Domestic enemies pursue legislation, programs against the powers of the US Constitution. They work on destroying and weakening the Rights of the People guaranteed by the Constitution. Plus they create laws, amendments, etc that goes against the restraint on the three branches of our government by the Constitution").

                                                                                                                                                        Domestic enemies (like traitors), since they work from inside a country/government, must say things that get people to like them, follow them, but their actions are not those of a supporter of the country, government; but works against it, destroying it from within. The only way they can be "discovered" is by their actions.

                                                                                                                                                        "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague." Cicero (58 B.C.)

                                                                                                                                                        • 4 votes
                                                                                                                                                        #20.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:48 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                        Defending the constitution is not treason. Cicero was from an empire that was not a democratic country. One that enslaved most of europe and the middle east. I wouldn't think his opinion would be the best here. Where many people feel our government is violating the constitution right and left. He also believed his leader was god.

                                                                                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                        #20.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:27 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                        Sorry Joe, the word "malitia" doesn't appear anywhere, not even the dictionary! The word is militia, and the problem is the organizations being discussed refuse to be regulated. Sovereign Citizens do not even consider themselves to be bound by the Constitution as they have renounced their U.S. citizenship and declared themselves to be "sovereign. You used the quote "a well regulated malitia"(sic). Well then, these groups must follow the law, not just their own interpretation.

                                                                                                                                                          #20.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 5:19 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                          Defending the constitution is not treason...

                                                                                                                                                          These whack jobs aren't defending the Constitution! Get real -- most of them have never read it (or anything else other than their BuyBulls) and the only thing they think they are defending are their bomb shelters and their wives which, in some cases, are also their sisters.

                                                                                                                                                            #20.8 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 7:09 PM EST
                                                                                                                                                            Reply

                                                                                                                                                            Yes, interesting points for sure. The definition and distinctions of the term "militia" is important, as someone mentioned above. Do "militias" and "occupiers" fall into similar categories? Could their growth be compared? And another discussion of violence vs non-violence protest of government seems necessary. Where does "hate" come in? What is the most powerful way to create change? How do we decide how an angered fringe group should be/can be empowered in the democratic process? Etc, etc, etc. All in all, a very interesting story.

                                                                                                                                                            • 6 votes
                                                                                                                                                            Reply#21 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:04 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            I wonder if by allowing these articles to be viewed on my fb I am allowing hate to escalate? That is not my intention, also, I still have faith in God first and our country second to not let any of this happen. They've proved in the past that they can stop this type of activity quickly and the only ones hurt most of the time are the anti-Americans or perpetrators. In God we trust.

                                                                                                                                                            • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                                            Reply#22 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:17 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            The Government should not hesitate in rounding up these militia nut cases. The Germans had similar groups in the 1920s called the Freikorps. They were later allies of...the Nazis.

                                                                                                                                                            These groups of racist cranks and crazies should be given no quarter in a democratic society. Round them up and try them for treason against our Constitution and Republic.

                                                                                                                                                            • 14 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #22.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:16 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            You sound like a VERY dangerous person Commander Ray.

                                                                                                                                                            I hope you do not live near me.

                                                                                                                                                            • 9 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #22.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:23 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            Say what you must but when the world crumbles and governments fail it is those with the power and the guns that will rise to the top. No matter what you do now by attempting to take the guns away from those who abey the law will only give strengh to those who do not. I for one will leaglly keep my guns until you pry them from my cold dead hands. It was a corny movie but The Postsman does have some truth what will happen when shet hits the fan. I will not be led by the wrong. If the jews had a militia they may not have been led to their deaths so easly.

                                                                                                                                                            • 5 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #22.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:49 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            Commander Ray You are why I will keep plenty of bullets and guns in the safe. And by the way I am not a christian I am way too smart for that.

                                                                                                                                                            • 5 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #22.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:01 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            Commander...so, in your DEMOCRACY, any group that does not view your way of thinking or beliefs should be rounded up? That is not a democracy plain and simple.

                                                                                                                                                            Go back to the library and start studying...your education is lacking.

                                                                                                                                                            • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #22.6 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:31 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            No mention of La Raza they wish for the eradication of blacks and whites, they are very vocal and active .

                                                                                                                                                            • 4 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #22.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 11:32 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            Commander ... "round up these nut cases", Really? Who is going to determine who are "nut cases" and who are just gun owners?

                                                                                                                                                            • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #22.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:27 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                            Commander Ray treason is an act not a belief. You can't round them up and try them because they think different then you. All you do then is prove they were right.

                                                                                                                                                            • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #22.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:32 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                            The Government should not hesitate in rounding up these militia nut cases.

                                                                                                                                                            I hope they militias round your Torie butt up.

                                                                                                                                                            They aren't commiting a crime by having militias, nationalist statist (anti-patriot).

                                                                                                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                            #22.10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:30 PM EST
                                                                                                                                                            Reply

                                                                                                                                                            Here we go again. Don't you reporters and editors have access to Google? A quick search will reveal that the SPLC has been discredited more than once.

                                                                                                                                                            Want to discuss militias? Read the U.S. Code first.

                                                                                                                                                            • 10 votes
                                                                                                                                                            Reply#23 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:22 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            Here are your " Christian Taliban " watch out America !!!!

                                                                                                                                                            • 17 votes
                                                                                                                                                            Reply#24 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:22 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            Are you believing only what is in the article or do you live in a place where the Nation of Islam and Black Panthers have no presence?

                                                                                                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                            #24.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:49 PM EST
                                                                                                                                                            Reply

                                                                                                                                                            I own a gun to protect myself from militias, not the US govt or even criminals. Try your ****ing power trip somewhere ELSE if and when law and order breaks down, jerks

                                                                                                                                                            • 11 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #25 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:23 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, AND George Washington all said the same thing about the 2nd amendment. They said that it was so the citizens could defend themselves, ultimately against their own government if it becomes to corrupt. Somehow i think you'll join that militia with your gun if the government starts rounding up people who don't agree with them and calling them terrorists so they can hold them in jail without charging them with a crime. Or even better they just have to accuse you of terrorism and they apparently can kill you without a trial even if your a US citizen, we know this is true because we actually already did it!

                                                                                                                                                            The rise of these groups didn't start with Obama it started with Bush and the Patriot Act. Rightly, these people are worried about what their government is becoming. We now hold people without a trial or charging them with a crime because they are labeled a "terrorist." The people who decide who gets labeled a "terrorist" aren't elected officials. You basically have no way of contesting being labeled a "terrorist." And now they can kill you because your a "terrorist."

                                                                                                                                                            Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. It's a cornerstone of the republic.

                                                                                                                                                            • 10 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #25.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 4:08 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            In the next election we will see massive numbers of illegals voting for Obama. No ID, no problem! This is why the Democrats are fighting every effort to have some kind of voter ID. Obama must be God! He even raises the dead on election night and they all vote for him.

                                                                                                                                                            As for all these white militias, It might be just what you think! But I have not seen one comment from you racest bastards about the black panthers or any of these type of groups! Oops, that's right, they are all working inside the government now!

                                                                                                                                                            • 12 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #25.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 6:27 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            Steve, time for your medication.

                                                                                                                                                            • 7 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #25.3 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:24 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            Take a double dose Steve.

                                                                                                                                                            • 7 votes
                                                                                                                                                            #25.4 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 7:39 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                            But I have not seen one comment from you racest bastards about the black panthers or any of these type of groups!

                                                                                                                                                            ROFLMAO

                                                                                                                                                            Did you wake up from the 60s yet there Steve? And it's spelled Racist, not Racest. :D

                                                                                                                                                              #25.5 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 8:51 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                              kama, I agree with you completely.

                                                                                                                                                              Our forefathers realized that we would get domestic enemies serving within our government sooner or later (Human nature being the problem). They created ever way they could think of to make a government powerful enough to deal with foreign nations, and yet limited enough in power that it could not "enslave" its own people. That is why the separation of powers, why the limited power of our fed gov, and why the states (except where overlaps fed gov power, fed gov power takes precedence) and the American people have unlimited powers (Amendment 10). Why it is put into writing within the US Constitution that at no time, for any reason can anyone who serves within our federal gov take away nor weaken any of our natural rights.

                                                                                                                                                              "I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations". James Madison

                                                                                                                                                              "The said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." Samuel Adams, 1788

                                                                                                                                                              We, the people, are the rightful masters of both congress and the courts - not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution”. Abe Lincoln

                                                                                                                                                              "There is nothing new in the realization that the Constitution sometimes insulates the criminality of a few in order to protect the privacy of us all". Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice, US Supreme Court. Majority opinion in 6-3 ruling that refused to expand police powers to search or seize evidence that they suspect may be stolen, 3 Mar 87

                                                                                                                                                              "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent which will reach to himself" Thomas Paine (1737-1809), Dissertation on First Principles of Government, 1795

                                                                                                                                                              "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed."Noah Webster, 1787

                                                                                                                                                              Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech’. Benjamin Franklin

                                                                                                                                                              Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat usJustice William O. Douglas

                                                                                                                                                              "The history of liberty is a history of resistance. The history of liberty is a history of limitations of governmental power, not the increase of it" Woodrow Wilson Speech in New York, September 9, 1912

                                                                                                                                                              If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, it expects what never was and never will be ... The People cannot be safe without information. When the press is free, and every man is able to read, all is safe” Thomas Jefferson

                                                                                                                                                              "If everybody is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking". Gen. George Patton

                                                                                                                                                              The opinions of men are not the object of civil government, nor under its jurisdiction. Thomas Jefferson: 1779

                                                                                                                                                              "I would remind you, that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And... moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue". Barry Goldwater

                                                                                                                                                              Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence. From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to ensure peace, security, and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable. The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good. George Washington, in a speech to Congress, January 7,1790.

                                                                                                                                                              The strongest reason for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government”. Thomas Jefferson

                                                                                                                                                              "A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government". Edward Abbey

                                                                                                                                                              "My belief has always been ... that wherever in this land any individual’s Constitutional Rights are being unjustly denied, it is the obligation of the federal government - at point of bayonet if necessary - to restore that individual’s Constitutional rights" Ronald Reagan, Press conference 17 May 83

                                                                                                                                                              When liberty is taken away by force it can be restored by force. When it is relinquished voluntarily by default, it can never be recovered. - Dorothy Thompson

                                                                                                                                                              The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive. Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Abigail Adams, Paris, Feb. 22, 1787

                                                                                                                                                              All that is necessary for evil to triumph, is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke.

                                                                                                                                                              • 8 votes
                                                                                                                                                              #25.7 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 10:14 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                              OOHHHH Big bad Dave, you guys crack me up. Well it is that time of the year when the libs panties get all wadded up. Dang does it hurt that much? Well this is the first step to see what the majority thinks before the action takes place. I guess all these true patriots are just going to give their power to the government.

                                                                                                                                                              Just before you idiots start crying about Bush; no they didn't like the patriot act and when it came about the liberals damn near creamed their jeans. Thinking this just might be what we need to get all those guns under control. Opps did I just say that, damn gotta watch that. Not very PC of me, is it!

                                                                                                                                                              Man I've never heard such cry babies in all of my life, tell my guberment on you. AhhhAhhh. You people definitely don't deserve the freedom you so enjoy. The true militia will allow the democratic process to take place long before they react.

                                                                                                                                                              So what they are storing up weapons and ammo, so what they are storing up food and water and so this is your business because of what? Don't be afraid and result to name calling and conjectures about people you don't even know. Just what is it you're so afraid of?

                                                                                                                                                              • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                              #25.8 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 12:56 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                              Well David since I don't think I'll even meet someone in the militia and I find my rights are in more danger from my government. I'll skip buying the gun and just let them arrest me and fight every step of the way through the courts and get all those rights groups overseas to make me their cover girl of the month. Watch it on the news.

                                                                                                                                                                #25.9 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:36 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                                I own a gun to protect myself from militias, not the US govt or even criminals.

                                                                                                                                                                Then you're highly confused (brainwashed) as to the realistic statistical threats to your life and liberty.

                                                                                                                                                                  #25.10 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 2:35 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                                  Our federal government has a pistol that fires a poison ice dart that causes a person to have a heart attack with a small almost undetectable entry wound. Ice loaded with poison, melts, no bullet clean kill. What kind of malita nut would want one of those. Can I get one of those? Probably not. It's for use by the 1% on the 99% anyway. Hay what kind of a nut would by 30,000 guilatine's and put them in military bases in the good old US of A. Do a search MSM isn't gonna say anything about it. "30,000 guilitines on American soil" is a search name. I wonder if they were made in the USA. Tax dollars sure paid for them. Fiat money anyhow. Probably gonna slice sausage with e'm. Yeah right! Patriot Act, NDAA, H.R. 347 Trespass Bill, just to name a few. Freedom gone. Hay folks what in the hell do you think is going on. Jumpi'n Jeasus these people are running this country and it is supposed to be the other way around. These malita guys can see the obvious coarse and we should be helping them instead of slaming them. They spend thair own money and personal time to be prepared to fight a government that buys 30,000 guilatines to do what with. Our state should be helping the cost of maintaning a malita instead of provideing retirement and health benefits to legislators and career politions. Christ. You call these guys "nut jobs". Well before you catch that ice bullet or have your head in the sausage cutter you will pray for some of those nut jobs to get there before it is to late. A stitch in time saves nine. This country was borne by the gun and may need to be saved by the gun. When all else fails it will be better to have them then not. Get e'm you don't have to use them but you will at least have a choice. I am quite sure that I would rather catch a bullet in the chest then to have my head lying in a basket. I wonder if you can still see while your brain is alive. Don't want to find out.

                                                                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                                  #25.11 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:09 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                                  The popularity of these monitored threads are such a wonderful resource for the media to pass on. Are the public willing to stand against the government? Is it time to take the guns yet? How do we do it - feel them out with hitting and taking down 'militias' first and state it was for everyone's 'protection'? Will the People stand for it? Should we wait and see if Obama is re-elected first and do it in the second term? When is the time ripe for doing the gun sweep? They tolerated the NDAA language. They're unable to fight back effectively against the attack on the church. We're inserting atheists into the mix on the heels of the outgoing religious folks. The contraceptive setup worked with Fluke. There's healthcare thing - that's the big socialist foot in the door. Once we're in, we're in. We'll turn this country into a socialist nation in a heartbeat. We've beat those old outmoded Americans with their own Constitution. We've got just the right man in office to do it. Keep calling them haters and religious nuts. Unless of course, they actually are paying attention... uh, oh.

                                                                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                                                  #25.12 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:12 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                                  Thank you Knine I appreciate someone else knowing their history and having the knowledge to put quotes of these people up. If we believe in the constitution we should probably remember to look to the people who wrote it and what they said about it if we want to continue using it.

                                                                                                                                                                  The interstate trade clause of the constitution is not a giant loophole to allow the government to do whatever it wants.

                                                                                                                                                                  The general welfare clause can't be used to defend making people do things for their own good, otherwise you end up telling people what they can eat, where they can go, how fat they can be, how much money they can make, ect ect.

                                                                                                                                                                  Until people start remembering the point of these things we'll continue to have Democrats and Republicans fighting over nothing. The problem isn't one of the two parties the problem is in BOTH parties. We need to vote out those people and get in people who understand that government isn't always the solutions, and YES GUNS MAY KILL PEOPLE BUT THE CITIZENS OF THE USA OF THE RIGHT TO OWN THEM, so you're just going to have to accept that some citizens will use the guns illegally.

                                                                                                                                                                    #25.13 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 9:30 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                                    You may be right, but not in the context that you probably visualize. If society breaks down. When all the delivery trucks stop running. If our power grid goes down, then we will see carnage on a large scale.

                                                                                                                                                                    The problem will be the availability of food. Without power to refrigerate certain foods, its shelf life is approximately three days! That is, if the delivery truck or trains are able to run. If not there is probably less then a weeks worth of food in most houses.

                                                                                                                                                                    When people run out of food they are going to go looking for it and it won’t matter where they find it. To survive they are going to try to take it! There in lies the problem of which you speak. It will not be armed militias but each an every individual who is starving.

                                                                                                                                                                    I raise my own beef, and grow my own vegetables! When they come looking they will find me. But I need what I have to feed my family. I will defend what is mine to feed my own before I let others take it.

                                                                                                                                                                    So by all means, by a gun, you may need it!

                                                                                                                                                                      #25.14 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 7:10 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                                      Steve & TNRebel.

                                                                                                                                                                      Same guy -- different screen-name.

                                                                                                                                                                      But all the same whack-jobbery from post to post...

                                                                                                                                                                        #25.15 - Fri Mar 9, 2012 7:21 PM EST

                                                                                                                                                                        Keep dreaming dMorgan! When the time comes and I "pray" it does not, you will probably be the biggest blatting ass on the block!

                                                                                                                                                                        Unless some one kills me, I have the ability and the resources to survive and to protect my family while doing so! I bet your option is to go to the nearest government office and cry for help. That is, if you don't already work there!

                                                                                                                                                                          #25.16 - Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:04 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                          Reply

                                                                                                                                                                          Who Cares? You Hillbilly beer guzlin inbreds don't scare us!

                                                                                                                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                                                                                                                          Reply#26 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:24 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                                          They're probably not too concerned with how you feel.

                                                                                                                                                                          • 4 votes
                                                                                                                                                                          #26.1 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 1:44 AM EST

                                                                                                                                                                          I'm absolutely certain there are many many millions more heavily armed very white proud Americans who are actually true to this Country, believing in our great democracy and to it's principles than all these goofy weekend white warriors who many think they are doing some right-wings mandate to overthrow our government or do God's work all put together. That's beyondlaw enforcement and armed forces. Then there are the other halve of Americans all just as patriotic of color and all of them with the same rights to stockpile lots of arms to defend themselves and our Country, and they do.

                                                                                                                                                                          Excuse the pun but it would be like a rat crawling up an elephants leg with sex on it's mind. The disappointment would be all theirs unequivocally.

                                                                                                                                                                            #26.2 - Thu Mar 8, 2012 3:25 AM EST