E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSSA quick-thinking New Jersey mother protected her children and averted a potentially violent carjacking as she left the Jersey Gardens mall in Elizabeth, N.J., on Sunday afternoon, authorities said.
The woman had just pulled out of the parking lot when a man approached her car at a stoplight and grabbed the door handle, according to Port Authority of NY/NJ police spokesman Al Della Fave.
Della Fave said the woman locked the doors. Then the gunman banged on her window and fired two shots into the ground, he said.
For more, visit NBCNewYork.com
With her children, ages 8 and 16, in the car with her, Della Fave said the mother took off as fast as she could, leaving the gunman behind.
The mom then saw a Port Authority policeman not too far away and stopped to report the incident, Della Fave said.
Office Frank Conti credited the mother's two children "with tremendous recall," and based on their descriptions, Port Authority police officer Edward Gonzalez, along with Elizabeth police, soon spied a suspect's vehicle nearby.
Police surrounded the vehicle and arrested three suspects while confiscating a .22 caliber Smith & Wesson handgun in the glove compartment.
The alleged gunman Terrell Melvin was wearing a monitoring bracelet on his ankle, police said.
Also arrested were the alleged driver of the car, April Sharpe, 31, and Darrell Washington, 26. All were from from Newark.
Charges against Melvin include carjacking, aggravated assault, weapons and other charges, authorities said. The other two suspects, who were not carrying identification, face carjacking charges.
None were available for comment, and it is not known who their attorneys are.
More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:
Leave a Comment:
Wow. Note to idiot thieves: Carjacking in groups leads to charges for everyone, and hanging out with someone with an ankle monitor is just bad juju, especially if there's a gun involved. Kudos to this family for their quick thinking, good observation, and level heads in getting these creeps off the street.
Repeat after me
We need moar guns! We need moar guns!
Where's Zimmerman when ya need him?
Don't give them any advice...innocent people depend on thieves and murders to be stupid.
moar guns? what?
it is a good thing she did not have a gun, she might have shot the carjackers, and then Jessee and Al would be leading a march.
This mother, with her actions, gave us a very good lesson, someone attempting to carjack you-accelerate like hell-if he happens to be hanging in your window or happens to be in front of you run him over or try to side swipe a telephone pole. It might just ruin his whole day.
Way to go Mom!!!
Um well kitty, one of them was already wearing an ankle monitor, so why would you think that they won't still be on the streets? He'll probably have to wear two monitors for a while. After all, you must realise that society has made criminals of them or their parents, certainly it can't be their faults can it?
I think we would be better off, putting these kinds of people in jail and keeping them there, rather than dope heads who only hurt themselves.
@Limbaugh-is an idiot.
The criminal with the ankle bracelet and the gun is hoping you get more gun laws passed so that the innocent citizens are not on equal terms with the people who don't obey the exisiting gun laws and who obviously don't have any trouble getting guns illegally.
Or, did you think that outlawing guns is going to work any better than outlawing marijuana, alcohol and illegal immigrants did?
In addition to the ankle monitor, How about the old ball and chain. Makes the approach to the car a little slower. I guess that ankle monitors work really well :)
The three arrested were all jerks..easy to spot them..all wearing hoodies and its not raining.
3 no accounts and only one gun? Here in the US yet? Damn shameful!
"We need moar guns! We need moar guns!"
So what are you going to do with moar guns, use them for your twisted sex orgies?
Well done!
Maybe they will give him TWO Ankle bracelets this time, that ought to do it. Maybe a nice wrist watch to match.
This woman was incredibly lucky that the carjacker didn't shoot at the car as she was driving away. That he shot at the ground was probably a good indicator that he didn't really want to physically hurt anyone, but people with guns in their hands put in unexpectedly stressful situations (eg, a woman who could identify him as an attempted carjacker) can do unpredictable and stupid things. Good for her to have the wherewithal to lock the doors and take off, but this story could easily have had a very different headline. Always beware an idiot with a gun in their hand!
If she and her children had guns, this wouldn't have happened!!!
You know you could poke someones eye out with that .22.
NEWSVINE should be ashamed for allowing this to be used as a name:
Leave the kids out of this!! She is a child!!
You are showing America what the left is all about! Name calling and HATE speech and yes it is the left that are the real racist!!!
tyler sally; what is going on with all the collapsed on the vine, if you make a statement not in tuned with the PC police, then you are collapsed.
Saxon:
You are right about that!!! The highest rated posts have been collapsed some of them with over 300 votes because they are not in line with the left.
The only way this could have ended better would be if she had run over him first. If all he has is .22, it would be worth a try...I mean if the kids aren't in the car.
Um airdog, the majority of voters are all for outlawing this or that and no, they never learn anything, no matter how many times they get bitten, they are always surprised, again.
No..the only way it could have ended better would have been if all 3 violent thieves would have been killed.
Society back in the day wouldn't have stood for that.
Um sane, http://www.firearmstactical.com/pdf/fbi-hwfe.pdf "Probably more people have been killed by 22 rimfires in this country than all other calibers combined."
WHy would someone think they can get away with a car jacking while wearing an ankle monitor? WHere did he think he was going exactly (I mean besides back to prison)?
Would have loved to see the look on his face if she had pull a 45/410 Judge out and answered is 2 22cal shots with two of her own. Let me guess another march because she had a bigger gun than him.
http://www.gunblast.com/images/Taurus-Judge/DSC00272.jpg
http://www.gunblast.com/Taurus-Judge.htm
So the carjackers had a vehicle? Makes no sense!
Ever hear of "Chop Shops?"
Or useing a stolen car as a get away car?
SamAdams. That is very true. You never pull it out unless you intend to use it and you always shoot to kill. That is what the training will tell you. Otherwise why bother having one? Sorry if you don't like guns. When the brown hits the fan you will be the 1st victim. Good luck.
Maybe they wanted a car each.
Hmmm... stealing a car so that you have a get away car from the crime of... stealing the car?
Where are all the gun toting people! This lady managed to save her children, herself and help catch the crooks without the use of a handgun. She used her brains instead......no way! I'm shocked! I thought you had to tote a gun with you everywhere to be safe or at least that's how it works here in Tennessee.
Maybe I was wrong....maybe we don't need to revert back to the days of the old west where you handled things at high noon in the middle of the town square.
So omgwitwct11 you are suggesting that we do away with guns because of 1 incident?
You would be a fool to try to pull a gun in this case.. That is a pretty sorry try to be anti gun.. Maybe you should take a certified course on handguns and learn how and when to use one. Also I would suggest listening to the stories of folks who loved ones have been harmed because they didn't have protection. Then come back and make a more informed comment.
Thanks, Tennessee
From what I've read on these boards, you should always have one and always shoot to kill.
High noon sounds fine to me. Duels makes for a politer society.
Well seeing as its extremely difficult for people to legally carry a gun in public in New Jersey that would help explain why they were not around OMGwitwct11. Gun owners are not saying a gun is the solution to every violent confrontation they are suggesting that it is a tool for such confrontations. It is up to the person to decide how they will react.
Omgwitwct11
She manages to save her children, etc… she used her brains instead, she did this without the use of a handgun.
Read the article again. The carjacker fired a couple of rounds into the ground. He could just as easily have fired the rounds into her face, then what?
Hm omg, do you think her lock stopped the bullets or that her car could outrun one? Get a clue, the only reason that she is not dead is because he did not want to kill her.
@ IWonder
Ever think that if he shot her while she sped away the car would be wrecked and useless? Not counting the public scene from someone driving by. Carjackers want to take a vehicle with the least amount of attention they can gather. Sure the shots made a noise but a 22 is not that loud and can be confused with a vehicle backfire.
A duel is a joke. Most gun owners would not want a fair fight where the other person had an equal chance to shoot them. If research is made I believe you would find that the majority of people in Florida killed in the name of "self defense" are unarmed that is unless you want to count the policewoman that was killed by a motorist. I have not heard of two people in a gun fight without one of them being a policeman. It's always someone carrying a gun shooting someone unarmed then saying that person threatened them bodily harm. Don't get me wrong, I have a concealed carry permit but I don't carry in public. Only at home and in my car and yes I would shoot someone that threatened me with a weapon. I over 70 years old and my fist fighting days are over and no way would I want to have a shootout with someone in a duel.
Well larry, you certainly are entitled to your opinion. I'll stand behind what I said.
I am over 70 years old as well and have never used a weapon against a human and do not intend to, however; my fighting days may not be over, depends on the circumstance.
" I thought you had to tote a gun with you everywhere to be safe or at least that's how it works here in Tennessee."
and yet you are living proof that morons still do exists.
omg - You method of analysis is that of a child. When you have to resort to over exaggeration to make your point you just show you have no reasonable or rational means available to you. Thousands of people a year defend themselves with firearms, mostly without having to fire a shot. You of course would take the firearms away from those people and make them all victims because one person didn't have to use a gun to prevent a crime. That is both myopic and idiotic.
Considering the article says he shot into the ground makes me think that IWonder is correct he didn't want to kill her, now had he fired those two shots into the vehicle???
Good luck getting a .22 to do more than chip auto glass.
Actually it doesn't. It just means that the asshat who's faster and more accurate wins. In the 17th and 18th Century there were actually professional duelists who could be hired to pick a fight with someone, accept a challenge to a duel by the unsuspecting victim, then kill them.
OMG what an idiot - if you can lock the doors and step on the gas (holy cow that's smart, batman!), there's no need for a gun.
Sane,
You are simply wrong. A standard .22 long rifle bullet leaves the gun with about 120 foot lbs of energy. It is travelling at about 750 miles per hour, (right at supersonic). It will deliver its energy to a very small point on the glass. It will break it and pass through with some energy remaining. A high end pellet gun will make a hole in automotive glass and it delivers only about 11 to 12 ft/lbs of energy. The key to breaking the glass is delivering the energy onto a small point. Car thieves sometimes use a spark plug with a relatively light blow. Similarly, rescue professionals use an "automatic center punch". Neither is exerting a lot of energy, but it is focused on a small point.
Arguably, the .22 bullet that pierces auto glass won't have a lot of energy left, but subsequent shots through the broken widow will have plenty of energy.
A .22 delivers about 1/3 the energy of a 9mm. The FBI says that the .22 is responsible for more civilian gun deaths than any other caliber. (Partly because of the large number of .22s available, but also due to the nature of the typical wounds.) These typically aren't "instant" deaths, but dead is dead. The .22 is not a toy. SEALS sometimes use .22s because it is effective and can be easily silenced. They wouldn't use it if it weren't deadly. Don't underestimate the power of the "lowly .22".
omgwitwct11, let me try to explain it for you.
I agree guns are not ALWAYS the answer but sometimes it is when one is trained correctly to use them.
A monitoring bracelet on the perp should have been a shackle -- to the other leg -- and locked to a cell bed. What was he 'in for' in the first place, armed robbery, carjacking?
I'm sure after 2 or three more carjackings the idiots who run our legal system may consider locking him up. Now if he tried to smoke a joint he would be doing at least 10 years in maximum security. Here's a tip folks - want fast police response? Don't bother saying they have a gun or are breaking into a house or raping someone - say you saw a baggie of weed - bam 3 cop cars.
Well big, put yourself in the cop's shoes, you put yourself to a lot of trouble and work catching a burlar, murderer or rapist, he'll be back on the streets before you can get your paperwork done, now someone with a baggie?
Is this him? http://www.mugshots.com/US-Counties/New-Jersey/Essex-County-NJ/Terrell-Melvin.html
Burglary/Entry Dec. 2011
Where's Zimmerman when ya need him?
Wasn't funny the first time you posted it...not any funnier this time.
where is your brains when you need one?
Finally, a GOOD story!
I agree...
.
Bravo to this mom and her children for averting another terrible tradgedy! Before backing out of my garage, I usually hit the lock button; if not, I remember it at the first stop sign. I've always thought there was a possibility of this very type of incident happening. I'm sure this is not the first time that it has happened; all of these incidents don't make the news.
My pickup truck automatlicly locks the doors for me when I start to drive. Toyota that was made in Texas by the way. Americam built vehicle for American wages.
Where does the "Profits" go? Who cares, I would never see a penny of it anyway.
My truck automatically locks too Dave at 15 mph (I have a Dodge Ram)
It's smart to do that txgran- I've actually been at a stoplight and have someone in the crosswalk, cut over and try to get in my truck, I couldn't just speed off because of oncoming traffic so I started blaring my horn caught the attention of a police officer, needless to say guy was intoxicated and thought he knew me, he went to jail and I went to work.
Folks, do you think that a lock will stop a bullet?
Auto locks are also on American-made vehicles.
I wonder: So are you saying everybody that is attacked by a criminal should just put up his hands and give up?? Don't fight back or you might hurt the Thug?
No IWonder it will not, but then me also carrying a gun (which I do) in my vehicle won't stop a bullet either, you were correct above when you said he didn't want to kill her, that's the ONLY reason this isn't a tragic story.
On some of the Fords now you can set up how the auto-lock works either having lock as soon as you start to drive or upon reaching a certain speed. I imagine there are other makes that do the same.
Nope tarzan, I am not, it was fine that she did something rather than just freezing but let's not make it something it was not. She is alive because he chose to let her live another day, nothing she did prevented him from putting a bullet in her head instead of the ground. True, he didn't want to damage the car but once he knew he was not going to get it, he didn't shoot her just for the fun of it.
1sg, I own several pistols and several air guns but if I was to hit anyone, it would be an accident. I have been target shooting all my life and still can't hit anything.
Interestingly, the average woman can shoot more accurately than the average man. Does not mean that that she is more likely to shoot at someone. It is definitely better to have no gun that to have one and refuse to use it.
I always make sure my doors are locked....always...and never stop for anything or anyone...not a lot I could do except call for help....which I can always do without stopping
called to report a huge ladder falling off a truck on a major highway...lots of cars damaged hitting that debris...hope I never see a car jacking...
This made me lol, I'm an excellent shot and my 15 year old daughter is even better, she can out shoot quite a few of my husband's soldiers, the thing about her though is she's right handed and left eyed so she always holds her rifle funny.
Why? It is an accurate statement.
for the sole fact that it IS an accurate statement Bassai and most men don't usually admit it.
Boy, letting the guy out with an ankle monitor did wonders for his behavior, didn't it?
Time to lock the moron up, and throw away the key.
Yeah, that's unreal isn't it? They aren't intelligent enough to get a good impression on the mindset of individuals that they are supposed to be protecting society from. I wonder how many crimes he did get away with while wearing his monitor.
True - they are looking at this bunch for similar attempted car jackings on Long Island.
I also wonder what kind of a tune they would be whistling if they themselves became the victim of a crime committed by an individual they decided to release with a monitor.
I don't understand how the guy with the ankle monitor was even there in the first place? Every person I've ever met who had one basically couldn't leave their homes other than to go to work, I thought the whole idea of it was to be monitored? Isn't that why they call it house arrest?
They won't keep him for long. They need all the room for the dangerous pot smokers. Why clutter up jails with violent criminals when there are stoners out there buying up all the Doritos and doughnuts?
Car Jacking was his job!
How the monitoring works depends on the state. Here they are used on people who are allowed some freedom of movement as well as people who are confined in certain types of facilities or on "house arrest." Normally the person wearing the monitor is required to pay for the monitoring. 24/7 real time monitoring is very expensive and most are not set up that way, the majority of them do a deriodic data dump and the information can be reviewed or just stored.
There was a guy here several years ago who was on one that was monitored 24/7 and confined to his house. He managed to get it off his ankle and on to his dog. Worked well until the dog got out.
Amen flbikerchick! While I don't "partake" myself I see no reason that our jails (and prisons) are cluttered with non-violent offenders! I think it's the misconception of pot being a "gateway" drug, funny thing I've smoked pot once in my life, but I just hit 15 years sober from cocaine and crank who'd have thought?
It all depends on how the monitor is set up. Some notify the monitoring agency as soon as the approved perimeter is breached, some don't notify until the monitor has been outside the perimeter for x amount of minutes. It may have even been set-up so he could be outside for work, a probation meeting, or for any number of other reasons. Also, most don't have GPS in them, so if the perimeter is breached, the law enforcement agency will know they are not where they are supposed to be, but won't necessarily be able to find them.
I actually got home from work a couple of years ago and found one that had been cut-off laying in my yard.
With having underwear showing over the waist bands of their pants like prison inmates being in such Vogue, the next fashion accessory ... if it isn't already one ... would be mock monitoring devices.
I am very glad this lady got her children and herself out of this situation, however she did it.
Thanks nate and Bassai I've always been confused as to how those things work (you can tell I've never had to wear one)
Must have been an old vehicle. All doors lock automatic since the middle 90's or the expensive ones do. So why did she have to lock the doors? So what would a car jacker want with an old car?
Thats not true. I have a 2005 Accord that does not automatically lock.
My car is a 2006 and it doesn't automatically lock.
@ Steven100,
Chop Shop or a get away car for a bank robbery.
A lot of cars don't lock until you reach a certain speed.
Steven100...
To automatically lock is selectable. Some people don't like the "vehicle" automatically locking the doors, some do.
Personally, I lock them as soon as I get in the vehicle. It's the smart thing to do. As this article shows, there are some stupid criminals out there.
yeah what skiing111 said, mine doesn't lock until I hit 15 mph
My car doors automatically lock, but not until I reach a certain speed so if I was not moving they would have to be locked manually.
Locked doors only stop someone who does not want in very much. This applies to cars or houses.
Not all cars have electronic locks. My wife's Cobalt doesn't, and it's much newer than our Aerostar which does. In the Cobalt (2005 I think) we actually have to physically lean over and push the locks up and down with our hand! I know, shocking...
But even the van doesn't have automatic locks. You have to personally push a button and all the locks in the van will engage, but they don't engage automatically when the van is moving.
unrelated but still a humorous story
this reminds me of when my daughter was 4 or 5 (she's 15 now) and she saw "roll up" (hand crank) windows for the first time, she literally spent 30 minutes rolling them up and down.
MSpielman- it wouldn't matter either way, if they truly wanted in your vehicle they'd shoot their way in.
IWonder as I said before, you're correct even though I carry a gun in my vehicle, if the person in this article were to shoot at me instead of at the ground, I'd be dead and he'd have my vehicle.
...and your gun.
and my gun... yes sir.
Good for the woman and her kids. It reminds me of a situation I witnessed years ago. A woman was at a stoplight at a busy intersection. I was just coming out of a post office and watched as this idiot ran up to her car and tried to get in. He got the door open and the woman hit the gas. The perp, being the idiot he was, got his hand stuck in the door handle and was dragged across he intersection before he came loose. Ever since then I have learned that you really need to keep those doors locked and keep aware of those around you at intersections.
She should have run the guy over....several times.
No, she did the right thing. Otherwise she would be arrested for murder.
sooooo true , but not funny when you think of trayvon martin , being stalked , and shot for carrying a lethal pack of skittles.
Rojpg Just another troll.
wow, already? don't know how people can relate this case with the trayvon case. Guess those connect the dots puzzles didn't work for repojpg.
He was standing beside her car. She couldn't drive it sideways.
Skittles are trademarked by the Rainbow Coalition. That's why Jesse Jackson got in on the affair.
HE WANTED PRISON TIME , AND HIS FRIENDS NEEDED PRISON TIME ; wide open , '' like a sitting DUCK '', no telling what a career gangster will do , '' when down on his pathetic LUCK.
As they used to say "Three hots and a cot." Of course in AZ you get pink underwear also, oh and a tent.
And we taxpayers have to pay for their existence! Put them on chain gangs working highway clean up at least they would be doing something useful.
or ship them to the countries where we laid out land mines and have them dig them out.
3 squares a day...exercise...tv....no responsibilities.
I guess that guy's parole is officially revoked. And we all thought LiLo showed poor judgement while wearing an ankle monitor!
The scourage of our cities everywhere.
I think you mean scourge.
Smart thinking on the driver's part. Glad they got the criminal too.
More of the "Mom" headlines. If a woman of childbearing age is involved in anything newsworthy, she is never a woman, victim, etc. She's a blank blank Mom. It's insulting to women. Obviously pandering for a headling. It happens at least once a week. Sometimes "Mom's" children are around, sometimes not. I'm surprised more don't complain of something I consider to be on the level of a tabloid. Whoops, that would be most news organizations today, wouldn't it?
I have no problem with using "mom" in the headline in this case. It's simply shorthand to indicate her children were with her. If you really want to make me cranky, let me hear a TV news anchor say, "A family is lucky to be alive this evening." I suppose there's nothing wrong with the comment per se; it's just that it is soooooo overused.
Rick -
You'll never be a mom with that attitude.
My question is, who was monitoring the crook's ankle bracelet? It should have been pretty obvious to the monitor that the guy was out running around in the streets and/or not in the place he told the cops he was going to be. Perhaps the monitor was in a donut-induced coma and didn't notice Melvin gallivanting around all over town.
Not very many of them are monitored real time 24/7 and it is mostly handled by contracted private companies.
Thank you for that Bassai, I was wondering about it myself, all the people I've known that have had ankle bracelets were on house arrest, other than going to work they were not allowed out of their houses within a certain amount of feet and they had to do a bunch of "voice testing" where the system would call every so often. Is that not in affect anymore? If so then house arrest "ankle systems" need to be done away with.
You're one up on me 1sg, I've never known anyone who wore an ankle monitor, don't know whether Texas is up to date enough to have them?
Depends on the system. Wife used to work at the state mental hospital. Picking her up one time I noticed a bunch of people come running outside and looking up. She explained that they had to go outside periodically to make sure they had a good link for the data dump. See my post above about the guy on house arrest.
in additon to Bassai's input; most of them don't have GPS in them, they simply notify the monitoring agency that the perimeter has been breached. Also, it is entirely possible that he was out of the house on approved time.
I live in Texas IWonder been here almost 12 years now, I'm honestly not sure, the people I knew who had them were in California. I think we're a little more hard core on our criminals here than they are in Cali though ;)
Then what's the point?
Wait - the guy was wearing a monitoring bracelet, and was out attempting a car jacking?
You can't fix stupid.
apparently you can't deter stupid either.
Few citizens are as smart as a snickerdoodle.
Wondering why the racist hate monger MSNBCBS didn't publish the carjackers race, what they weren't white hispanics? LOL
why you bring that up? are you a racist hate monger?
no it's probably because they were black, I've been paying attention for a good while and I've noticed that if the assailants are black they don't mention race, coming from a very mixed family I have to say Robert is correct.
MSNBC is horrible when it comes to reporting, but when did this become a race issue? unless of course you want it to? which means you're no different.
It really doesn't matter to me what their race or races were, I am glad the family got away unscathed and the perps did not.
THIS ^^^
but I was just replying to Robert and the punisher.
When the mugshots are posted the race war officially begins. That, or the families will give out pics of when the young perpetrators were around 9 years old.
like klone siad, does it hurt, being that stupid?
how is that stupid? maybe we should be asking you if the truth hurts?
Don't bother with Pun. His MO is to attack other peoples comments rather than make a true contribution to the forum. Not a lot of original thoughts coming from his direction.
ah huh, what truths are you reffering to fitzwife? That we should all live life through a racist glass?
Oh and surefiresnake, so you are saying your BS is the only one valid? You are right, I do attack dumb people's comments. one thing's for sure, you tend to make a lot of dumb comments don't you?
See. Yourcomment about attacking Dumb peoples comments is exactly what I'm talking about. Who are you to say anyone is dumb? Nearlyy everyone of your comments is an attack on the person you're replying to, not the subject. You rarely use reasoning in your comments. Then again, even the fact of arguing with you about it is ridicules. Just look how you react to things.
well, surefire, what subject are you reffereing to? that izmee is such an intelligent person to make a connection between what happen in florida and this case? that to stereotype people is how we should all live our lives? that it is ok to be a racist? you really think that a person making such a comment is intelligent enough to have an intelligent discussion? If you claim to be such an intelligent poster, don't tell me you couldn't see what the comment implied? or is it ok, to make such dumb comment, because you some what agree with it?
There you go. That's what you're suppose to do. I haven't agreed nor disagreed with the subject. The reality is all your ideas, fact or not, and points go out the window when you simply point at someone and call them a name. Debate on a subject is good. Calling someone or someone's comment dumb or stupid only shows that the one saying it isn't that far away from that reality.
On the other hand, I do agree with you (surprising I know). To link the two is childish but at the same time so is name calling.
BTW
I gave you the checkmark on your last comment. ;)
well, I apologize if my tact seems childish. I tend to comment based on the level of thought put in a post. yes, name calling is not a good starting point for any debate. I just felt izmee's comments didn't deserve that level of response.
I apologize also, I haven't been paying much attention to the Zimmerman/Martin case, so I didn't make the connection thepunisher. But I did find it odd that they didn't mention the races of the people arrested which msnbc is notorious for if they're white or hispanic.(or both in Zimmerman's case)
The article did not mention what color they are. ? Come on MSDNC, were they negros?
No, they weren't french. what's your point dude?
@Larry - why is that relevant? Why can't we just have one news story that doesn't make assertions one way or another regarding race?
I'm not going to pass any judgement until I hear Barack's view on this.
You take advice from Borat?
April Sharpe? That's an oxy-moron!
Wet Willie. She then has an air conditioned brain. Correct. Shots not fired into ground for $200 Alex..................
It is a dog gone shame that she did not run over the POS while speeding away. If he has an ankle bracelet on and a firearm then they need to lock him up and keep him locked up until he is old and feeble. People like that never learn
...she'd really want her kids to see her squashing that guy...sure...
Carjacking huh? Let me guess now who could be the one's that did it. Hmmm, No don't tell me let me guess. Maybe Al or Jesse could help on this. Maybe Obama could help, he like's to jump in on thing's he knows nothing about. I wonder what would have happened if this woman would have shot the Carjacker's??
LOL, there would be massive protests on the NJ turnpike for shooting an "innocent" carjacker with ankle monitor
hahahahaha