After closed discussion of 'jury matter,' John Edwards trial breaks for weekend

The judge in the John Edwards trial calls a closed door meeting with jurors on Friday. NBC's Gabe Gutierrez reports.

Updated at 5 p.m. ET: Jurors in the campaign finance corruption trial for former presidential candidate John Edwards went home for the holiday weekend without having reached a verdict, but not before the judge closed the courtroom for a private meeting with prosecutors and defense attorneys.

U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles told the lawyers that she had "a jury matter to discuss" with them. Thirty-seven minutes later, she sent the jurors home for the weekend, giving them extra instructions about the importance of not talking about the case outside their official deliberations.

She reminded them that they mustn't discuss the case with anyone — "as you walk back to your cars" or "in small groups."  


Eagles said she could hold another closed session to talk "about this same juror issue" when deliberations resume at 9 a.m. ET Tuesday, after the Memorial Day holiday.

 

It will be the beginning of the second full week of deliberations in Edwards' trial in U.S. District Court in Greensboro, N.C., where he is charged with six felony counts of accepting about $1 million in illegal and unreported campaign donations from two wealthy supporters during his 2008 presidential campaign at a time when individual donations were limited to $2,300.

By Stacey Klein of NBC News in Greensboro, N.C., and M. Alex Johnson of msnbc.com.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Discuss this post

Let the Games begin.....Jury Foreman scheduling conflict ???.....Alternate Juror flirting with the Defendant....what will he come up with next ???......Reminds me of and old Cartoon Jingle....And a new Nick-name for Edwards.....

"Felix the cat
The wonderful, wonderful cat
Whenever he gets in a fix
He reaches into his bag of tricks

______________________________

Felix the cat
The wonderful, wonderful cat
You'll laugh so much your sides will ache
Your heart will go pit-a-pat
Watching Felix the wonderful cat"

    Reply#1 - Fri May 25, 2012 5:52 PM EDT
    Garrison Hermanvia FacebookDeleted

    Can a moderator get rid of this advert, please.

      #1.2 - Fri May 25, 2012 7:37 PM EDT
      Reply

      My guess is this "juror issue" means there is an idiot serving on that jury. I've served as a juror three times. Two out of three of those experiences taught me: "there is always one in the bunch". There was absolutely no way to reason with those two people. They had their point of view, and no facts or deliberations were going to change their minds. The defense attorneys always look for this type of person to select for jury duty.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#2 - Fri May 25, 2012 8:00 PM EDT

      Sounds like they either have a juror who is trying to intimidate the other jurors or there is a juror who is not deliberating in good faith. Either that or they have a juror who did not anticipate the trial taking this long and has some kind of schedule problem with a prior commitment. I would not be surprised if we here news on Tuesday that one of the jurors has been replaced with an alternate.

      • 3 votes
      #2.1 - Fri May 25, 2012 8:19 PM EDT

      Intel2 At least you have the time to participate in that type of circus. I am a very busy person, and every time a receive a letter in the mail for jury duty, I just throw it in the garbage can.

        #2.2 - Sat May 26, 2012 12:48 AM EDT
        Reply

        even though Edwards is a *ackass.,,,,,he didn't do anything illegal. The trial is just a waste of taxpayers money. He has created his own hell.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#3 - Fri May 25, 2012 10:58 PM EDT

        Mama always said life was a like a box of unorthodox chocolate.

          Reply#4 - Fri May 25, 2012 11:54 PM EDT

          It certainly sounds like Edwards committed illegal acts and that the evidence is strongly against him. He is a very slick guy and maybe not be found guilty but it would go a long way towards making the "many" others politicians think twice before doing the same thing.

            Reply#5 - Sat May 26, 2012 12:38 AM EDT

            If he had become friends with the Clintons he would have never had to go to trial.

              Reply#6 - Sat May 26, 2012 12:52 AM EDT
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.