Judge revokes bail for George Zimmerman in Trayvon Martin case

A Florida judge on Friday revoked the bail for George Zimmerman in the Trayvon Martin case, saying he had misled the court about his finances, and ordered him to present himself to the court within 48 hours.

Prosecutors alleged in a court filing that Zimmerman, 28, hid from the court the fact that he had raised $135,000 on a website he set up before he was granted $150,000 bail on April 20. Zimmerman is facing second-degree murder charges in the shooting death of Martin, 17, in February.

In a hearing in Sanford, Fla., that Zimmerman did not attend, Judge Kenneth Lester said Zimmerman engaged in a "material falsehood" about his finances.

Assistant State Attorney Bernie de la Rionda  said Zimmerman's wife, Shelly, led the court to believe they were penniless, which he called a “blatant lie."


De la Rionda said the Zimmermans spoke in "code" about moving finances around during telephone calls while George Zimmerman was in custody.

The state also alleged Zimmerman held a second passport after surrendering one to the court when bail was granted. In revoking bail, Lester said he was not swayed by arguments about the second passport, often routinely obtained by people who lose their passports.

A Paypal account that George Zimmerman failed to reveal to the court during the bond hearing was linked to a website Zimmerman created to raise money for his defense in the Trayvon Martin case. NBC's Kerry Sanders reports.

Zimmerman's attorney, Mark O'Mara, said it was his fault the court did not have the second passport earlier.

Trayvon Martin family attorney Benjamin Crump said Lester's finding that "Zimmerman was dishonest is very important  because his credibility is the most important thing in this entire case."

"Credibility is the issue and we think it is the most important ruling so far in this entire case," Crump said.

The revocation motion was filed as a hearing opened on the confidentiality of evidence in the case, including Zimmerman’s statement to police.

A consortium of more than a dozen media groups is asking the judge not to seal records in the case. Prosecutors and Zimmerman's attorney fear witnesses will be harassed if their names are publicized, but the media consortium says that's not a good enough reason to keep what is usually a public record from being released.

On Friday, De la Rionda asked that the names of witnesses be sealed. Lester said it would take several weeks to review evidence before unsealing any.

O'Mara said he concurred with the state's request to seal the identities of witnesses, because witnesses would be subject to ongoing requests for information from the media, he said, and their stories could change during retellings published in the press.  He added that he does not "deny" freedom of press, but wants "one trial" before a jury in a case that has enormous pressure from the "blogosphere."

After learning that jailhouse conversations were held between George Zimmerman and his wife, concerning an effort to misrepresent the amount of money available to them, the court revokes Zimmerman's bond.

Regarding Zimmerman's statements to police, O'Mara said he would like 30 days to review them before a decision is made on making them public. O'Mara said if Zimmerman's statements were not made voluntarily, he could file a motion to prevent them from being shown at trial. He added that a delay is "not unreasonable."

“I would suggest that this case is months and months and months away from a trial date," he said, adding, "We're six months out from finishing discovery."

See more msnbc.com coverage of the Trayvon Martin case

Zimmerman is accused of killing Martin as he walked through a gated residential community in Sanford, Fla., near Orlando, on Feb. 26.

Police initially declined to arrest Zimmerman, who claimed self-defense, but a special prosecutor who was subsequently appointed charged Zimmerman with second-degree murder.

Msnbc.com's Jim Gold contributed to report. Follow him on Facbeook here.

George Zimmerman's attorney, Mark O'Mara, reacts to Judge Kenneth Lester's decision to revoke his client's bond.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 44
Comment author avatarSir MasonRestored

I hope and pray the bail will be revoked, immediately! :-)

  • 111 votes
#1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:26 PM EDT
Comment author avatarFedupwithFedExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Give it up already! We are sooooooooooooooo tired of the Trayvon BS already! A thug picked a fight with the wrong man....end of story!

  • 236 votes
#1.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:43 PM EDT
Comment author avatarJoe-3144156Restored

There is no legal reason for it to be revoked. But of course in florida it seems there is no need for reason.

  • 138 votes
#1.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:48 PM EDT

Well it was just revoked. Yikes

  • 17 votes
#1.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:49 PM EDT
Comment author avatarLMarcTExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

And where would you stand if the shooter was 30 and black and the victim was a teenager and white?

No answer required. Just think about it.

  • 173 votes
#1.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:49 PM EDT
Comment author avatarJames HeidelRestored

WHAT is to be achieved by revoking his bond? The do-good state has NO CASE and all they do is drum up silly chareges of misleading the court over $100,000!

  • 114 votes
#1.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:52 PM EDT
Comment author avatarkevinoffsiteExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Really FEDUP? Didn't know you were a witness... That sure clears it up.

  • 107 votes
#1.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:52 PM EDT
Comment author avatarEric-913730Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Gotta love the gun loving righties, falling all over their sword for Zimmerman that didn't need to follow Martin at all, and wait for the police.

You lied to a judge, and you got what's coming.

  • 159 votes
#1.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:58 PM EDT
Comment author avatarguy-2789881Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Fedup...Apparently he lied about his passports. Probably lied about everything else too. He probably banged up his own head or had one of his buddy cops do it. The good ol boy network is breaking down when the light of truth is let in.

  • 131 votes
#1.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:58 PM EDT
Comment author avatarAnaBanana-1782128Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

fedupwithfed,

You don't speak for me or most for that matter. This isn't even political. It is a travesty that a young man lost his life because of the color of his skin. That is the thought of most democrats, republicans, independents, etc. etc. etc. . . . and then we have people like you. Who don't want to hear about the ills of our country so we can change for the better. They would prefer we go backwards so that the South can rise and people of color are enslaved once again. . . SEEE! . . . I'm speaking for you and you don't like it much do you?

  • 116 votes
#1.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:58 PM EDT
Comment author avatarBruce-308647Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I am shocked he was even charged giving the amount of evidence that seems to collaborate his story. And now bond is completely revoked?! This case just gets more and more convoluted all the time. I cannot imagine in 1000 years a jury convicting him "without a reasonable doubt". Just a lot fishy going on.

  • 108 votes
#1.10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:58 PM EDT
Comment author avatarEd Bernatvia FacebookExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Travon was kicked out of school for drugs.Sent to his father because his mother could not handle him. Doubled back on the townwatch who was telling police about him. And jumped while on phone. had this happened in my neighborhood there would have been no trial either. MSNBC you have been removed from all my stuff and I have been with you since 1998 because of your bias setting up of this story. And I am seeking our firm cease advertizement on any thing you affiliate with. I have been in that situation before. And it is not good not everyone has the training to deal with thugs. And he needed a gun. Everyone is not chuck Norris....Hope it was worth it MSNBC because last I heard your profits were plummiting....

  • 89 votes
#1.11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:59 PM EDT
Comment author avatarSeven2SevenExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The NAACP slipped the judge some "greens" to make this happen?? To hell with Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, I know they are behind this with their drum beating club. So what, 2nd passport. Is he still in the US? YES. This is purely racially motivated and I hope Zimmerman can sue this redneck Florida court when he is found innocent...........

  • 79 votes
#1.12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:59 PM EDT
Comment author avatarWilliamOfRitesExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

A thug picked a fight with the wrong man....end of story!

By "thug" you mean the armed vigilante and "wrong man" you mean one that carried Skittles instead of a gun??

  • 133 votes
#1.13 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:59 PM EDT
Comment author avatarMike in DelrayExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Hillary set up the "Bill Clinton Legal Defence Fund" and took in Millions....So what people are donating to help Zimmerman with his defence....everyone charged is entitled to a competant defence....Lawyers cost money, in case you don't know....

Hey Fed....

  • 59 votes
#1.14 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:59 PM EDT
Comment author avatarJH-479998Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I hope Zimmerman sues the state of Florida after this is all done. And he should go after horse's ass Mr. Ed for the altered 911 tape and his assinine rants for over a week on his show.

  • 71 votes
#1.15 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:01 PM EDT
Comment author avatarWilliamOfRitesExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Ed Bernat

MSNBC you have been removed from all my stuff

Doesn't that beg the question Ed, why are you still reading and posting on MSNBC??

  • 79 votes
#1.16 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:02 PM EDT
Comment author avatar2-Lane GypsyExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The NAACP slipped the judge some "greens" to make this happen?? To hell with Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, I know they are behind this with their drum beating club

Teabagging Racist...arent you late to your cross-burning?

  • 84 votes
#1.17 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:03 PM EDT
Comment author avatarFed Up-2683606Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Well, LMarcT, then it would fall into that 45% of violent crime perpetrated against whites.... that's done by black racists Funny I don't hear Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson screaming about that "unreported by the lamestream media" statistic

  • 45 votes
#1.18 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:03 PM EDT

The trial will happen folks and all the evidence will come out. If you lie about your finances where bail is concerned then you are deceitful and the court can't trust you. Hence, return to jail.

  • 134 votes
#1.19 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:04 PM EDT
Comment author avatarFed Up-2683606Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Which is why issuance of concealed carry permits is UP...

  • 15 votes
#1.20 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:04 PM EDT
Comment author avatarMinan59Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I cannot imagine in 1000 years a jury not convicting him "without a reasonable doubt". How does anyone murder an unarmed person and think they can get away with it?

  • 84 votes
#1.21 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:06 PM EDT
Comment author avataralans4Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Aren't you late for your welfare checks? 55 people were shot in Chicago last weekend. Any arrests? Crayon had drugs in his system and was looking to rob someone.

  • 39 votes
#1.22 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:06 PM EDT
Comment author avatarStan-3196017Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The ONLY victory that the prosecution can hope for is getting his bail revoked on a technicality ... that's about it! This still screams of a lynch mob!

  • 52 votes
#1.23 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:06 PM EDT
Comment author avatarsaxonExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

LESSON ONE; he did not inform his attorney about the 2nd passport, two he misled his attorney on the amount of money being raised over the inner-net for him;; LESSON, lie to your mother, your father, your pastor, your wife , your children, NEVER EVER LIE TO YOUR ATTORNEY., at the hearing the prosecutor had all the phone calls zimmerman made, they agreed that his attorney was not informed by his client, from conversations zimmerman had with his wife.

(p.s., why do they continue to put baby pictures of Martin up, .)

  • 32 votes
#1.24 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:08 PM EDT

DUMB, DUMB, DUMB. He just keeps doing things that do not help him. Remember, people, his father is a retired judge. I think he knew the law and was involved in the process. When the court says turn over your passport, it means all of them and Zimmerman knew that or should have known that. It implies that he intended to jump, even if that was not the case. It is all about the risk.

  • 99 votes
#1.25 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:13 PM EDT
Comment author avatarphillyfan-2830508Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Ya because everyone MUST have a passport to leave the country, right? What a bunch of fukn idiots. No one smokes pot or crack because its illegal too, right?

  • 12 votes
#1.26 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:16 PM EDT

ed Bernat said:

Travon was kicked out of school for drugs.Sent to his father because his mother could not handle him. Doubled back on the townwatch who was telling police about him. And jumped while on phone. had this happened in my neighborhood there would have been no trial either.

Whoa, where have you been? What news have you been watching? Let me correct a few conceptions here.

Martin was suspended, not expelled. The empty bag in his backpack had possible marijuana residue in it but he wasn't caught with it, so he was suspended, not expelled.

His parents are divorced and his father has visitation, so at the time this happened his Dad was taking him to visit father's girlfriend in a better part of town likely to get him away from bad influences and to talk some sense into him.

W don't know exactly what happened on that night, so there's no being certain that he 'doubled back on townwatch who was telling police about him'.

Zimmerman was not on the phone when the altercation occurred. According to various timestamps there is a gap of 1 minute and 20 seconds between the time Zimmerman hung up the phone with 911 and when the first 3rd party (witness) 911 call came in that had the shot that killed Martin. Martin, however, was reportedly on the phone talking to his girlfriend at the time the altercation occurred.

  • 106 votes
#1.27 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:17 PM EDT
Comment author avatarthturdExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

apparantly some of you ignorant idiots think it is perfectly fine to lie in the court of law... It is now clear that he withheld information such as 2nd passport and his true financial situation.

WHY IS IT THAT YOU JACKASSES THINK THAT RULES APPLY TO OTHERS, NOT YOURSELVES?

  • 88 votes
#1.28 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:18 PM EDT
Comment author avatarrobbopaloobopExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

LMarcT

where would you stand if the shooter was 30 and black and the victim was a teenager and white?

This happens every day

....which case are you referring to, exactly?

Can you be more specific?

  • 16 votes
#1.29 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:23 PM EDT
Comment author avatarscramboloExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The more I read about this case the more I believe Zimmerman is NOT guilty, the justice system is 'rigged' with prosecutors who are NOT out for justice but only fame and recognition so they can climb the 'political- ladder', many, if not most, defendants in sensational cases are tried in the press, and that Zimmerman's lawyer was sleeping at the switch when it came to the second passport. If anyone is guilty of not reporting the second passport it is Zimmerman's legal team. However, he may be guilty, but I don't believe so based on the FACTS which are now available. Time will tell, hopefully!

  • 47 votes
#1.30 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:24 PM EDT
Comment author avatarPaddy O FurnitureExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

And in the end, we will all remember who Trayvon Martin was. But, will we ever know who Channon Christian/Chris Newsom, or Chris Jones were? Just to name 3 out of thousands of white victims of hate crime committed by more than one black person, which is clearly an unfair fight, but I wouldnt expect any different! Please dont ask me to "feel sorry" for the poor black victim who had his name plastered all over the place for weeks and weeks, was even acknowledged by the president (gee I wonder why) but the mainstream media seems to conveniently "overlook the tragic premeditated" murders such as the Christian/Newsom murders and poor little Chris Jones who were attacked and murdered by a group of black people, simply because they were white. Yes, its sad that this altercation ended in death, but it would be sad if he was any race, and I can imagine that Trayvon Martin and Chris Jones are in heaven looking down and nodding their heads at the double standard that exists here.

  • 48 votes
#1.31 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:27 PM EDT

This is not a payoff from the NAACP, this is George not listening to his lawyers or his father. When he set up the first website it was done without the knowledge of his lawyers, and they quit. Now he has this mess with a second passport and I am sure there are other things. He will not take advice from his lawyer(s) and that will be his downfall. And if he applied for a second passport with all this stuff going on, I am sure it raised a red flag and that is why he got in trouble. Is it a US passport btw?

  • 53 votes
#1.32 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:27 PM EDT

"WHY IS IT THAT YOU JACKASSES THINK THAT RULES APPLY TO OTHERS, NOT YOURSELVES?"

Hello and welcome to America! Are you new to my country?

Double standard's the name of the game here 'cause (like the James Bond song goes) nobody does it better.

  • 21 votes
#1.33 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:29 PM EDT
Comment author avatarAnaBanana-1782128Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Fed up,

You mean law enforcement focuses on prosecuting black on white crime more than the other don't you? Because statistics show that I am 100% correct and you are 100% incorrect. Go ahead give me more biased facts, like most "shoplifting is done by blacks" Wrong again! Again law enforcement as well as loss prevention in stores focuses on blacks and completely miss the whites committing the same crimes. Also law enforcement pulls over blacks and hispanics and a higher rate than whites. I had a motorcycle cop right in front of my home and watched as he let a lexus and a bmw go by with fierce speeds that he did notice because his head turned in their direction as they sped by him.,but he took off after a small Toyota with a black family in it that wasn't even speeding as far as I could calculate. Probably for the crime of driving while black through a white neighborhood.

  • 51 votes
#1.34 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:31 PM EDT
Comment author avatarMarchantExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Neither Zimmerman nor Trayvon Martin were Caucasian.

How can one call this a Racial Murder--White upon Black Murder.

Zimmerman is a curious character with lies, and what about Trayvon Martin's character. The young boy Trayvon's picture is still being used for sympathy, he as a "kid". The Media should stop that. Two grown Men.

As someone said before, it was a thug murder. The Judge in Florida is pressing hard to make this a Racial case. Why?=-What is she getting out of this whole over blown, long case that happened in February---Is she being pressured by Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and other Civil Rights Activists?

In order to find out the truth, the Trial must happen, with a closing Verdict. Look at John Edwards. The same may happen here---deadlocked jury, mistrial, or off the Charges.

Zimmerman is paying a big price for being used as an "Example" of Racial Bias in this Country.

  • 25 votes
#1.35 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:33 PM EDT
Comment author avatarMandatedLiberalIdeaExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

AnaBanana, the true racists are the ones who see racism everywhere. Look in the mirror... there's one!

  • 25 votes
#1.36 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:39 PM EDT

Ciewywtb - you may be accurate in your analysis but that does not make it justifiable. The same rules should apply to everyone.

Instead of getting into a frenzy over every twist and turn in the case (and I suspect there will be many more in the days and weeks to come), why don't we all wait until the trial and hopefully the truth will come out. From my perspective there is enough evidence reported in the so called news media to support either a guilty and a not guilty verdict.

For those that are so certain of his guilt or innocence, at this point you appear to be making some assumptions to reach your conclusions. You may be correct, but you also may be completely wrong. So lets wait and see how this all comes out during the trial and quit beating each other up until then.

  • 22 votes
#1.37 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:56 PM EDT

Why, he didn't run and he's still here in the country. The prosicuters are desperate to mak him look worse than what he is.

  • 18 votes
#1.38 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:59 PM EDT
Comment author avatarMark L-464288Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Teabagging Racist...arent you late to your cross-burning?

Spoken like a true Liberal! Fact less emotion that always breaks down into name calling...boy your a big man aren't you...

  • 17 votes
#1.39 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:02 PM EDT
Comment author avatarBullfighter-2591838Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Zimmermann has done everything legal. He deserves his freedom! Lock up the Martin Gangbangin' Family.

  • 18 votes
#1.40 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:03 PM EDT

Marchant

Poor Zimmerman 'used as "an Example" of Racial Bias in this Country.' Really? What about Trayvon Martin? No sympathy there huh? I guess all the 17 year old BOYS you grew up with were fine upstanding citizens that NEVER rebelled or did anything like smoke pot? Otherwise they were thugs too, right?

Zimmerman IS white with Hispanic ethnicity in his background. You really know little about minority relations because if you did, you'd know some white Hispanics are just as racist against blacks as any white redneck.

While the degree of Zimmerman's racism is unknown...but his stupidity is clear.

  • 58 votes
#1.41 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:04 PM EDT
Comment author avatarvfeinsteinExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Oy vey ... There is no law that states that the only racial crime can be black on white/white on black. Yes, Virginia, there IS hispanic on black/black on hispanic, white on hispanic/hispanic on white, asian on black/black on asian, etc., etc., etc.

Further - Sadly, many of Georgey Porgey Puddin' 'n Pie's cheerleaders still have their facts completely wrong ... I suspect however, if George Zimmerman was black and Trayvon Martin was white, the same crackers would be positively apoplectic over such a travesty of justice as we are witnessing in this case. What a pathetic and cowardly lot you cheerleaders are ...

  • 30 votes
#1.42 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:04 PM EDT

Once again the right wingers show their hypocrisy, "No activist Judges" but because this Judge followed the Law you guys want to complain. Classic!

  • 42 votes
#1.43 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:22 PM EDT
Comment author avatarTommy Lee-1217088Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I can see right now that they are going to try to convict Zimmerman not because he is guility, but because he is white.

  • 16 votes
#1.44 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:23 PM EDT
Comment author avatarAnaBanana-1782128Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

MandatedLiberalIdeal,

I guess you prefer I close my eyes and see nothing, hear nothing, and say nothing . . . like that monkey? Me thinks lots of citizens, including you, resemble that monkey. I prefer to keep my eyes and ears open. I rarely speak, so when I do, people tend to listen.

  • 13 votes
#1.45 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:25 PM EDT

TO: FedupwithFed who wrote:

"Give it up already! ... A thug picked a fight with the wrong man....end of story!"

A child of any color or nationality in the United States ought to be able to walk to the store in a gated community, buy skittles and an iced tea, and get back home alive, which was only a couple blocks away.

Whenever a child in the process of performing such a simple task isn't able to get back home, it's usually because a "thug" shot him.

  • 59 votes
#1.46 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:30 PM EDT

I am glad to see all the "righties" on here are supporting LYING UNDER OATH TO A JUDGE.

I guess it's ok to lie and break the law if you are a Republican.

  • 55 votes
#1.47 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:35 PM EDT
Comment author avatarsean1980Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Why is no one talking about the black dude that ate the white dude's face off?????????????? Is that a hate crime??????????

  • 17 votes
#1.48 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:40 PM EDT

PaddyO... by your account of supposed reverse discrimination, then you are admitting that this is a racially motivated case?

Marchant... Racially motivated crimes does not need to be white vs black!!! It is racially. Are you seriously deficient in think outside of black and white?

Ciewywtb42mh6sps... lol

valhallaarwen... if that is the case of G Zimmerman not following his advisors. Perhaps it is similar to G Zimmerman not following the advise from the 911 operator.

scrambolo... using a broad stroke to paint all things as political excuse is simply weak. There are plenty of good DAs and politicians despite of their political beliefs. It is about the intent. It is simply weak to write things off so easily through generalization. This is about accountablity. NO ONE should be subject to such callous nature of others and the written law.

  • 12 votes
#1.49 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:50 PM EDT

Paddy O Furniture: "But, will we ever know who Channon Christian/Chris Newsom, or Chris Jones were? Just to name 3 out of thousands of white victims of hate crime committed by more than one black person"

In how many of these cases were the killers known and taken into custody, but then released without being arrested? That is what makes this case different, and why the media became involved.

  • 21 votes
#1.50 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:52 PM EDT
Comment author avatarJohn-2006106Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Funny that the outrageously poor economic report didn't get RED BANNER HEADLINES.

Non-farm payrolls rose by 69,000, the lowest increase in a year and well below the 150,000 jobs that economists had expected. The previous two months' numbers were also revised lower, adding to the concerns about a sputtering recovery.

Yep, it's almost like MSNBC was waiting with baited breath for ANYTHING to get his news off the radar screen. I wonder why the Media has allowed the Administration to falsify the jobs numbers for March and April, while dutifully reporting the Administration's talking points that things are getting better.

.

  • 6 votes
#1.51 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:00 PM EDT

It don't count.

  • 1 vote
#1.52 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:03 PM EDT
Comment author avatarJim in AuburnExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

vfeinstein-

Which facts do people have wrong that think him innocent?

The fact that Zimmerman following Martin was completely legal? The fact that Zimmerman had a legally registered gun that he had a permit to carry? The fact that Martin was on top of Zimmerman pounding on him? The fact that Zimmerman had a broken nose, black eyes and lacerations to the back of his head?

Then there are facts that are not so clear cut. Things like it appears that Martin attacked Zimmerman.

If you are doing something legal, there is no justification for someone to commit an illegal act upon you. So if indeed Martin attacked Zimmerman first, then he broke the law, and paid for it with his life. If Zimmerman attacked Martin first, actually physically attacked him, not just followed him, then Zimmerman should be found guilty. All the crap about following him has no bearing on this case.

  • 13 votes
#1.53 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:15 PM EDT

Bullfighter wrote "Zimmermann has done everything legal. He deserves his freedom! Lock up the Martin Gangbangin' Family" intersting... If Zimmermann has done everything legal, then why did he not informed the court his financial situation and his 2nd passport? Like I mentioned earlier, you are a typical example of RULES APPLY TO OTHERS, NOT ME.... In addition, it sounds like you're such used car salesman such that partial truth is perfectly fine. And, in your case, I am probably insulting used car saleman.

sean1980... really? you really want to go there? you're one trolling racist who doesn't have the guts to confront the truth, but simply hide behind screens of others flaming on others. WEAK.

Tommy Lee... Convict G Zimmer of guilty before the trial? Really? isn't that what Democrats said about John Edward's campaign fraud case? You have ZERO faith in people. So why should people have faith in your beliefs?

  • 10 votes
#1.54 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:17 PM EDT
Comment author avatarEBC-3901100Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Shouldn't Zimmerman get a reward for ridding the world of yet another thug? How can I donate money to his cause? Sign me up.

  • 6 votes
#1.55 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:20 PM EDT
Comment author avatarsean1980Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

@thturd

HAHA, dude, I'm black. Can't hit me with that racist thing. But, good try. This story is just old and the black zombie isn't making any waves anywhere.WOW!

  • 4 votes
#1.56 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:24 PM EDT

JimInAuburn... You do know that G Zimmerman was following T Martin in a car. So if Treyvon assaulted G Zimmerman, then the assault would have been in a car. Do people think before talking? In addition, just because you are getting pounded during a fight does not mean you're innocent nor guilty. It simply means you were involved in a physical dispute... Again beware of Darwinism.

Really, it is okay to stalk??? Are you trying to justify something you're doing that we're not aware of??? lol??? one disturbe perb....

  • 16 votes
#1.57 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:25 PM EDT

Lying is wrong. Lying while under oath in a court of law is criminally wrong. I said it when Clinton did it, and I'm still saying it now. GZ needs to quit being stupid, and play it straight, or he *will* be convicted.

  • 11 votes
#1.58 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:25 PM EDT
Comment author avatarHell no-568603Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

The posters here sound like a baptist convention. One incident, many different interpretations and only deal with the facts of the case and others are too stupid to even understand the meaning of words.

Why is a hate crime? Elementary Dr. Watson, just because Zimmerman is Hispanic doesn't mean he doesn't hate blacks, quite contrary, by refusing to follow the instructions of the police dispatcher, he shows w/o any doubt, he was up to no good and why, because when he saw the person was black, he decided to chase. Many people have said it many times, had the other guy been white, we wouldn't be talking here or any where for that matter, ergo, it's clear racism. second, if tea partiers are involved, then the only conclussion is that racism is the driving force. All they know is to kill minorities, always trying to impede voting by minoritites. If it is republican, tea partier, then it is racist. Not two ways about it. They are the epitome of racism in America today.ergo, racism is always at the forefront of their actions. They might use the law, but to conceal their true intentions and nothing more. They care for the Constitution like a dictator care for his country.

Now, let's try to show how many mental midgets flock here. Someone with an alias of Merchant said this: Neither Zimmerman nor Trayvon Martin were Caucasian." First of all, technically speaking, races are only three: Caucasian, negro and mongoloid. Caucasian means people whose ancestors came from Europe and let me enlighten Mr. ignoramus that Zimmerman's family's family is white on his father's part and on his mother part, she could be white, because although the media says she is from Peru, I know, met many people there that came from Spain, ergo, Mr. Zimmerman is caucasian, ergo, white. Many ignoramus or let's make it plural, so let's say ignorami can't tell the forest from the trees and they try to disguise that horrendous lack of knowledge by trying to sound like oracles, just like Merchant when in reality they are as lost as Jimmy Hoffa's body. The races, as I learned them to be since I was a child, were: Caucasian, Black and yellow. Trevor Martin is black and Zimmerman white.

Now let's review the latest. It's well known, specially being under oath and even less when in court, that you can't lie. The premise is that if you lie once to the court, you lose all credibility with the court, ergo, your words explaining a lie have no meaning, therefore, the judge decided to revoke his bail. The only person responsible for his situation today is Zimmerman and from my point of view and listening to the 911 tape, he is guilty. He was told not to go after Mr. Martin and that is the most damming thing in this case. People should also know as it has been reported by different media corporations that many of the detectives stated that it was a crime and they also knew about that racist law, product of a racist state, "Stand your ground" and they still stuck with premise that a crime had been committed, but the white sheriff wanted none of that. I know truth hurts, but it shouldn't hurt when we try to find out the truth. Let's remember, the truth should set you free. Guilty as charged.

  • 14 votes
#1.59 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:37 PM EDT

@ Thturd,

I believe that GZ is innocent. I think they will try to give him a guilty verdict because, 1. Al and Jesse have stopped their march for justice as they see it. Seems a little funny to me, why all of the sudden they are quiet, cause I've never known anything to silence them. Why should people have faith in my belief's you asked? I mearly stated my opinion as I see it, I don't expect them to "have faith" in my beliefs.

  • 4 votes
#1.60 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:44 PM EDT

Teabagging Racist...arent you late to your cross-burning?

Aren't you late for your welfare checks?

2-Lane Gypsy, alans4, you are both suspended for a day for violating rule # 1 of the Code of Honor.

Above all else, respect others. Address issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks.

  • 12 votes
#1.61 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:01 PM EDT

Those liars always get away with it!...Where is Zimmerman to stalk Zimmerman when we need him?

  • 13 votes
#1.62 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:04 PM EDT

LMarcT: if the shooter was 30 and black and the victim was white and a teenager, what I can tell you is Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson wouldn't even get involved!!!!!

  • 8 votes
#1.63 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:23 PM EDT

What I find surprising is the amount of money he was able to raise and in times when people are pressed to the limit to make ends meet in this low economy. Then try and keep that 130,000 from court records.

  • 10 votes
#1.64 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:43 PM EDT

For all those quoting the "facts," you don't know the "facts." The jury is the finder of fact, and only after ALL evidence has been presented, tested, balanced, and analyzed. Until then, nothing is proven fact. There are a lot of conflicting allegations presented being accepted as facts, depending on the bias of the listener after receiving them through the media. Good grief.

Also, don't confuse the bail hearing with the trial. They are separate issues entirely. Frankly, attempting to mislead the court regarding the financial information and the passport was foolish. Whether it was the accused, or counsel, or whoever behind it, it impacts the accused. Period.

In time, this will reach trial and a jury. Until the conclusion of that process, nothing is certain and not everything is divulged or clear. For everyone to reach a verdict on a message board based on media reports.. well, silly. Just silly and possibly harmful.

While I know our system is not perfect, generally, I believe that juries do their best, with few exceptions. Let the process play out, let the jury do its job. The vehemence with which some of you defend your "verdict," pre-trial, is a bit unnerving and then you rail that a fair trial cannot be had because you fear the ultimate verdict may not concur with your own? Stunning.

  • 9 votes
#1.65 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:44 PM EDT

LMarcT - I wonder what would happen if a black man shot an unarmed Mexican and claimed self defense. No need to wonder, the answer is nothing! This just happened in Arizona. Where's the big stink and the lynch mobs in this case?

The revocation of Zimmerman's bail, is just more political correctness being directed from above. If Zimmerman was going to leave the country, he would have already done it. In fact, given the security on our borders, who needs a passport? Of course the Mexicans might be more diligent in guarding their side of the border.

  • 7 votes
#1.66 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:59 PM EDT

I have a headache - anyone have an asprin?

  • 2 votes
#1.67 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:02 PM EDT

I'll also take an aspirin - love it when Newsvine takes 10 minutes to load its ads, so much for the edit option.

  • 4 votes
#1.68 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:09 PM EDT

thturd:

You do know that G Zimmerman was following T Martin in a car. So if Treyvon assaulted G Zimmerman, then the assault would have been in a car. Do people think before talking?

Actually, GZ noticed Martin while GZ was in his vehicle, then when Martin took off, GZ exited his parked vehicle and attempted to follow Martin on foot. The incident that ended in Martin's death took place roughly 100 yards away from GZ's parked vehicle. This is information that has been made available to the public so anyone who's done any research could find it.

Does that help answer your question about whether people think before talking?

  • 6 votes
#1.69 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:13 PM EDT

just take two advil...post us when the zimmerman goes away...

    #1.70 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:15 PM EDT
    Comment author avatar45charlestonExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    Thye Judge dfid what he had to un der the law when he suspects misrepresentation in obtaining the bail !

    However the new hearing will reassess the amount not the bail itself.

    It doesn't change the facts of the bail.

    BZ will be granted bail but may be forced to pay a larger portion. The Lawyer should move the money to his trust account which is what the money was donated for .

    The burden for the state is to prove GZ wasn't acting in self defence.

    All known evidence points to self defence !

    • 3 votes
    #1.72 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:20 PM EDT

    This is a rehash of what happened just after bail was posted. I.E. the money was known about the day after. The second passport is probably the problem.

    • 1 vote
    #1.73 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:33 PM EDT

    hope they put zimmerman....in with some real thug gangster's...they will make sure he doesn't hurt the wanabe's...

    • 9 votes
    #1.74 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:34 PM EDT

    @James Heidel...what part of lying to the court about his financial status and failing to surrender his second passport are you having difficulty understanding. He violated the conditions of his bond. Back to jail for him. And his wife should face perjury charges, as well, for lying to the court about their financial status. Can't believe there are still people out there willing to defend this dishonest, kid killing, low life.

    • 14 votes
    #1.75 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:45 PM EDT

    To those saying the law is not applied fairly, and if the races were reversed the black man would definitely be charged, read this, Murdock is black Lavoie was white, no charges have ever been filed, Murdock used the stand your ground law.

    http://www.crestviewbulletin.com/articles/fla-11411-pompano-beach.html

    • 1 vote
    #1.76 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:48 PM EDT

    The Judge didn't even mention the 32nd passport !

    He only mention money in setting the amount at the bail hearing.!

    That will possibly result in a higher bail amount but as we all know he had trouble raining the 10% which $15000 dollars !

    It is not about the setting bail itself.

    • 1 vote
    #1.77 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:52 PM EDT

    GZ's honesty has no bearing on his guilt.

    The state has to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. You don't have to believe GZ. You have to prove he intended to kill TM & that will never happen.

    If this gets past discovery I will be shocked !

    • 2 votes
    #1.78 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:02 PM EDT

    He didn't violate the conditions of the bond but rather the law which applies in setting the bond.

    There is a difference. He will now have a new bond hearing !

    • 3 votes
    #1.79 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:06 PM EDT

    You people need to read and listen to all the evidence that has been released already.

    Zimmerman was informed that he was not needed to follow Martin. He did stop.

    Lets also look at the video of the clerk selling Martin the tea and skittles. Any of you 'intelligent' people notice anything odd. How about Martin wobbling on his feet. How about the clerk moving back away from Martin during the transaction. How about the fact that the clerk stopped moving all together while watching Martin. Sounds to me like Martin was acting in a suspicious manner at the store.

    • 2 votes
    #1.80 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:12 PM EDT

    feeling no sympothy here, listening to symphothy of destructy. Thats what zimm did acting like a wannabe, putting himsellf in a position unwelcome to a peaceful state. As far as florida hmm, bet you get worse news than the man eating dude, florida is a a republican expierment gone wrong.

    • 2 votes
    #1.81 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:19 PM EDT

    Irene46 said:

    trayvon did have residual amounts of tch in his system from marijuana he had used several days before. yet we'll never know what was running through geozim's vein's, since the police tripped and fell for every word that rolled out of his "only one passport-indigent" lying mouth.

    Actually, we do, since his medical records show he was under medication by a psychologist. He was taking Temazepam and Adderall. Here's what Wikipedia says about Temazepam:

    Temazepam (brand names Restoril and Normison, among others) is an intermediate-acting 3-hydroxy hypnotic of the benzodiazepine class of psychoactive drugs. Temazepam is approved for the short-term treatment of insomnia. In addition, temazepam has anxiolytic (anti-anxiety), anticonvulsant, and skeletal muscle relaxant properties.

    Adderall is a brand name of amphetamine salts-based medication used for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and narcolepsy,legal only in the United States and Canada.

    So he was taking one drug to go to sleep (Temazepam) and another to stay awake (Adderall). Adderall, by the way, is an amphetamine--the same class of drugs as meth[amphetamine]. Temazepam is a benzodiazepine, and this is listed as a possible side effect:

    Paradoxical reactions, such as increased seizures in epileptics, aggression, violence, impulsivity, irritability and suicidal behavior sometimes occur. These reactions have been explained as consequences of disinhibition, that is loss of control over socially unacceptable behavior. Paradoxical reactions are rare in the general population, with an incidence rate below 1% and similar to placebo.However, they occur with greater frequency in recreational abusers, individuals with borderline personality disorder, children, and patients on high-dosage regimes. In these groups, impulse control problems are perhaps the most important risk factor for disinhibition; learning disabilities and neurological disorders are also significant risks. Most reports of disinhibition involve high doses of high-potency benzodiazepines.

    So if someone is going to argue that Martin was 'high'--had traces of the activive ingredient in marijuana in his system (and note the medical examiner's report said it was a trace and below the level that medical research says causes impairment) then you must also bring up the fact that Zimmerman also had psychoactive drugs in his system.

    In my state if a psychologist has you under treatment for any kind of mental disorder, you have to surrender your weapons and permits. Also in my state is a law that says if you have a history of any violence--even a restraining order/injunction, and even if it is mutual, your permits are revoked and your weapons must be surrendered. I'd like to know if FL has a law like this.

    As Zimmerman had a prior restraining injunction against him (and one on his girlfriend) plus a history of assaulting an officer (even if said charges were dropped, he was still arrested for it and it is on his RAP sheet) I would ask why he still had a weapon and a permit.

    • 14 votes
    #1.82 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:22 PM EDT

    I think the racial aspect of this case is inconsequential and trivial. Do any of you really think that Zimmerman shot and killed Martin solely because Martin was black? I seriously doubt that. It seems that this neighborhood had a history of break-ins and burglaries reported as committed by blacks. Many neighborhoods have experienced the same problems with Hispanics. Many neighborhoods have experienced the same problems with young white drug addicts or thugs.

    My first impression (after reading several news articles) was that Zimmerman was likely a wanna-be cop. His past history strongly suggests it. Race or ethnicity has little to do with it. Martin was a 17 year old young man that was suspended from school because of an empty bag with traces of pot. That could probably happen with half of the students(his age) in American high schools. Race or ethnicity has nothing to do with it.

    The facts are that Zimmerman was an enthusiastic member of the Neighborhood Watch program (not a hired armed guard). As such, his strict instructions were to observe and report any and all suspicious behavior and NEVER follow or confront a suspect. The dispatcher that took his 911 call clearly reminded him of those critical instructions. He not only violated those instructions, but violated another condition that his duties forbid him from carrying a fire-arm.

    The facts are that Martin was an under-age young adult armed only with a bag of candy and soft drink intended for his little brother who was waiting home alone. Martin was a young man visiting his father who was a legal resident of the community. He had as much right to be there as Zimmerman. I can easily imagine the terror of a 17 year old being stalked by an older stranger with questionable motives. At 17, would I have chosen to double back to confront my stalker or risk leading him home to possibly endanger my little brother? I don't know. Do you?

    The most troubling aspect of this case is that a very small and inefficient police dept. was the deciding factor in sending Zimmerman home as a free man and sending young Martin home in a body-bag. I still find it hard to believe that it was because Zimmerman was white and Martin was black. I think it had much more to do with Florida's much too vague "Stand Your Ground" law.

    This small police department probably felt the new law hampered them from charging and arresting Zimmerman. Now, add in the factor that Zimmerman's father was a retired judge. Imagine the furious phone calls to the Chief of Police demanding that the judge's son be released immediately because of this new and vague law.

    The most obvious racial tone was the emergence of black leaders, Jackson and Sharpton, to bring this case into the national limelight. I'll be the first to admit, in my opinion, that duo have played the role of agitators in some previous cases. Not this time. As a white father of two adult young sons, I heartily congratulate them for forcing this issue into the courts where it belonged in the first place.

    A 17 year old kid (yes, a kid, not yet a man) lies in his grave. Truth and justice must be served regardless of our political beliefs or any prejudice we may hold in our hearts.

    • 10 votes
    #1.83 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:26 PM EDT
    Comment author avatarJim in AuburnExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    You do realize that he was not on a patrol session? Zimmerman was just on the way to the store or back from the store when he saw Martin.

    He was keeping the suspicious person in sight because they ran. Kind of like when a police officer chases someone that runs when they see the cops. The dispatcher said that they did not NEED him to follow the person. They say this to cover their buts so you do not sue them if you get hurt. It is perfectly legal to follow someone in your neighborhood if you find them suspicious. Also, if you listen to the call, you hear him running to catch up with Martin after he took off. It is at that point that the operator says they do not need him to follow Martin. He says OK and stops running.

    His statement is that he began to return to his vehicle when he was confronted and attacked by Martin.

    My guess is that Martin was probably high. Was a bit afraid and decided to attack whitey that was following him, errr I meant whitey hispanics.

    • 5 votes
    #1.84 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:51 PM EDT

    The stand your ground law doesn't hamper anything. It is an extension of the laws of self defence & means you don't have to take a way out if it presents itself !

    GZ will probably never face a jury. He should be released at discovery since there is no evidence to prove his guilt !

    • 3 votes
    #1.85 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:54 PM EDT

    So What he didn't tell them about $135,000 and his bail was revoked. Good for The State of Florida. This is not an issue i can do anything about. The one thing i will say is this IT IS NOT A POLITICAL ISSUE. This is probably not the racial issue the People are making it out to be. This is a Legal issue and it needs to be resolved quickly. The statement about 6 months is ludicrous if it were me in his shoes i would insist on the speedy trial according to the law and Constitution if they don't have the evidence now then they can only be trying to fabricate evidence. Get on the stick Florida and get him to trial.

      #1.86 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 9:08 PM EDT

      Under the law TM is an invitee on the property since he has no ownership or parent living there.

      He can go to the dad's girl friend's condo but can be observed by a NW or anyone living there . There were in fact blue & white signs posted that the complex was under surveillance by NW'

      GZ did the right thing & called authorities.

      • 6 votes
      #1.87 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 9:08 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarCheryl-3343292Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      As far as for George Zimmerman...Florida law states that you can protect you, your property and family as needed with force. Mr. Zimmerman did the right thing and the courts are not looking at the fact that Mr. Zimmerman had blood on his head...did he do that to himself...no he was jumped by this punk walking around in a hoodie in the dark. For one if you have nothing to hide, when asked to identify, you identify, you don't jump the individual...that's why he got shot. If this incident would have involved me, I would have done the same thing. Jump me and you deserve whatever happens...including death. Rev. Jesse Jackson and Rev. Sharpton are blowing this all out of proportion and feel that this was done out of being racist...mexican against negro...give me a break. Just something for some individuals to do to stir up the media. The law is the law for a reason...means obey it and you get to live longer than expectancy will give you.

      • 5 votes
      #1.88 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 9:13 PM EDT

      sean1960...

      Thanks for the chuckle on the white guy asking for hate crime rights. I once had a workmans comp claim that inevitably led to my company treating me differently than how they treated another worker (latino) who also had a previous workmans comp claim. My attorney simply said that any type of reverse discrimination claim wouldn't be viable. Apparently the courts do indeed look at race very differently.

        #1.89 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 9:28 PM EDT

        commonsense said:

        Do any of you really think that Zimmerman shot and killed Martin solely because Martin was black?

        No. I don't.

        My first impression (after reading several news articles) was that Zimmerman was likely a wanna-be cop.

        I saw an article where a reporter went back to Virginia where Zimmerman used to live and where his father was a judge, and talked to a friend. That friend says Zimmerman said he applied to be a cop in FL, was turned down, and asked his friend to look into the requirements of being a cop in VA since he'd been rejected in FL, and if he (Zimmerman) could pass he would move back to VA.

        Martin was a young man visiting his father who was a legal resident of the community. He had as much right to be there as Zimmerman. I can easily imagine the terror of a 17 year old being stalked by an older stranger with questionable motives. At 17, would I have chosen to double back to confront my stalker or risk leading him home to possibly endanger my little brother? I don't know. Do you?

        Martin's father wasn't a resident, but they were visiting the father's girlfriend, who was, and had done so on multiple occasions over (reportedly) the previous two years. (Unless Zimmerman was a new arrival to the neighborhood, which it seems he was not, it seems reasonable to think that he may have seen Martin on other occasions.) The father's girlfriend had a son named Chad, younger than Martin, who Martin may have considered his 'little brother' and who was obviously trusted enough by both father and girlfriend to leave home to babysit while the father and girlfriend went out to dinner. Halftime of the NBA Allstars game, Martin decides he wants tea, Chad requests Skittles, Martin goes to buy, never comes home.

        While nothing concrete has been said, had I been Martin's father and Martin been my son who is hanging out with questionable friends, letting his grades slide to a B+ and being suspended for possible drug use, I would have taken my son out of the neighborhood during his suspension, lodged him with my girlfriend in a neighborhood away from any possible bad influences he may have picked up, and tried to talk some sense into him, instilling in him a sense of responsibility; there is this younger child who looks up to him as a surrogate 'older brother' and he has a responsibility to set a good example. To reinfiorce that sense of responsibility, leave him alone to babysit one evening. Since Chad is not much younger than Trayvon (think the article said he's thirteen) it is okay to leave him for short periods of time but not for longer periods so Martin didn't go far to get the tea and candy.

        You know what gets to me? Chad probably thinks if he hadn't asked his 'older brother' for candy, Martin might not have left the house that night and would still be alive. It's called survivors' guilt. Chad, if you're reading this...keep telling yourself this isn't your fault. None of it was. A lot of people made some bad decisions that night, and your brother is dead because of those decisions, but it is not your fault.

        • 8 votes
        #1.90 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 9:41 PM EDT

        Jim in Auburn said:

        My guess is that Martin was probably high.

        The medical examiner's report states that the levels of THC, the active ingredioient in pot, was not high enough to cause impairment in Martin.

        Zimmerman has amphetamines and benzodiazepines in his medicine chest at home, which can cause 'aggression, violence, impulsivity, and lack of control over socially unacceptable behavior.' These drugs are being prescribed by a psychologist to treat Zimmerman's anxiety, insomnia.

        If you're going to insist that Martin was under the influence of drugs you have to be fair and point out that Zimmerman was also under the influence of drugs as well.

        • 13 votes
        #1.91 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 9:53 PM EDT

        enough of the racist crap already! a stupid, racist, cop-wannabe harassed and picked a fight with an innocent kid and killed him. and anyone who defends this idiot is a racist as well.

        END OF STORY.

        • 9 votes
        #1.92 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 10:05 PM EDT

        Zimmerman was half white and have Peruvian. Mexico was as distant for him as most of us.

        Does Florida law state that you can use deadly force to protect the property of your neighbors as well? Does that apply only to your next door neighbors or include all of those on your own block? Perhaps it applies to your entire community, township, city and county. Exactly how far are the perimeters where we are allowed to stalk an individual we may deem as a suspicious character? The entire State of Florida?

        I've got news for you, Pal. I am a free American citizen and Florida resident. Any stranger in street clothes that confronts me on public property and demands my identification will be met by my own version of "stand your ground" by telling you to mind your own business. The same goes for any gated community where I am invited. You may have a license to carry a concealed weapon and shoot me dead. You can then share the same cell as Zimmerman. You will never intimidate me.

        Those of you that yearn for the old west where we took the law into our own hands may be happier in the remote warlord villages of Afghanistan. Don't forget to grow a heavy beard and wrap a towel around your head lest your severed head be placed high on a wooden pole.

        • 12 votes
        #1.93 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 10:15 PM EDT

        Sally... I saw your suspension of a couple of posters above over a little name calling. I have but one question.

        Where the hell were you & Tyler during the Rush Limbaugh vs Sandra Fluke debate. The crap was hitting the fan for days and not once did I see a suspension of any poster. Try being a little consistent.

        • 4 votes
        #1.94 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 10:29 PM EDT

        Sir MasonRestored

        I hope and pray the bail will be revoked, immediately! :-)

        • 88

        • !

        #1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:26 PM EDT

        FedupwithFed Comment collapsed by the community

        Give it up already! We are sooooooooooooooo tired of the Trayvon BS already! A thug picked a fight with the wrong man....end of story!

        • 208

        • !

        #1.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:43 PM EDT

        Gee Sally, only the liberal comments get restored? So much for freedom of opinion or speech on newsvine? 88 to 208 tells the majority!

        • 4 votes
        #1.95 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 11:02 PM EDT

        There are some truly disgusting comments here defending Zimmerman. The blatant lies and shady history combined with the fact that Zimmerman was on Benzos and Amphetamines are more than enough to hold Zimmerman until trial. It is obvious Zimmerman has no moral compass and would have no problem lieing or fabricating evidence to benefit himself. All the supporting evidence so far has been in favor of Martin and I am sure they are keeping their most damning evidence hidden until the trial.

        • 11 votes
        #1.96 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 11:30 PM EDT

        For all those quoting the "facts," you don't know the "facts." The jury is the finder of fact, and only after ALL evidence has been presented, tested, balanced, and analyzed. Until then, nothing is proven fact. There are a lot of conflicting allegations presented being accepted as facts, depending on the bias of the listener after receiving them through the media. Good grief.

        Actually, all the key evidence has been outlined in publicly available documents. What I find interesting is that the prosecutor is bound by law to outline all the key evidence in the indictment against an individual, but in this case, the prosecutor ignored virtually all evidence that would support Zimmerman's story while including evident favorable to Martin. The prosecutor KNEW there were photos of Zimmerman's cuts and injuries but did not include them. THe prosecutor never even asked for any doctor's reports on Zimmerman, even though he was examined and a doctor's report detailed the injuries to his eyes, nose, and back of his head. It's very obvious that the prosecutor who pressed the charges presented only one side of the evidence that was available, and this is perjury for them to do that. Zimmerman has not been treated fairly since all the race baiters got involved in this case.

        • 1 vote
        #1.97 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 11:35 PM EDT

        Should we be surprised that Zimmerman's defenders ignore the lies he's told, and reject punishment of him for violating the law?

        His lying about having no money is a fraud on the court, as is that of his wife, who should also be prosecuted. Fraud is a serious offense. Well, it would be if Zimmerman weren't sufficiently white.

        • 7 votes
        #1.98 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 12:08 AM EDT

        Cheryl-3343292 says "if you have nothing to hide, when asked to identify, you identify."

        Cheryl-3343292, Identify, post your true identity now!

        • 2 votes
        #1.99 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 1:05 AM EDT

        A thug picked a fight with the wrong man

        The NAACP slipped the judge some "greens" to make this happen

        Crayon had drugs in his system and was looking to rob someone.

        Please dont ask me to "feel sorry" for the poor black victim

        Lock up the Martin Gangbangin' Family.

        Shouldn't Zimmerman get a reward for ridding the world of yet another thug?

        As a white person, I am shocked and embarrassed by the racist comments on this board! Perhaps I am naive, but I did not realize that racism was still so rampant today. It seems to me that the ONLY reason why people are still defending Zimmerman - even though it becomes more and more apparent that he is a liar - is because he is "white" or, at least, "white enough". The truth will come out - but certainly not out of Zimmerman's mouth!

        • 13 votes
        #1.100 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 1:22 AM EDT

        Assistant State Attorney Bernie de la Rionda said Zimmerman's wife, Shelly, led the court to believe they were penniless, which he called a “blatant lie."

        To obscure his finances from the court, Zimmerman used "code."

        Zimmerman also FAILED to submit ALL of his passports to the proper authorities.

        This racist nut is being tried for 2nd degree murder.

        Yet, the court, that he is being tried in has caught Zimmerman lying and dying the court!

        In the due process of law, arrogantly, Zimmerman continues to make his own decisions.

        Zimmerman refused to obey the police dispatcher's orders, not to follow Trayvon.

        The above recently discovered events, give strong credence to the fact that Zimmerman, is a defective non-conformist being, who on February 26, 2012, stalked, snuffed out, killed and murdered Trayvon Martin!

        Send this Thug and Sludge to prison...for the rest of his life!

        • 7 votes
        #1.101 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 1:46 AM EDT

        Have you listened to the tapes? The "order" that the dispatcher gave to Zimmerman was that they did not NEED him to follow Martin. He was running at the time by the sound on the tape. He says OK, and then the running sounds stop.

        Now as for the lying to the court about money, if he did, then he should be held accountable.

        As for the second passport, does he really have it? Did he just lose one and get another one, so the government shows he has two but he really only has one and he turned it into the court?

        • 2 votes
        #1.102 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 2:50 AM EDT

        And ironically he is not even allowed to use that money, but yet the judge revokes his bail based on said money.

        • 2 votes
        #1.103 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 3:52 AM EDT

        Jim in Auburn,

        Not by coincidence, your previous illogical post was about to be responded to:

        Jim in Auburn

        vfeinstein-

        Which facts do people have wrong that think him innocent? The fact that Zimmerman following Martin was completely legal? The fact that Zimmerman had a legally registered gun that he had a permit to carry? The fact that Martin was on top of Zimmerman pounding on him?...Things like it appears that Martin attacked Zimmerman. If you are doing something legal, there is no justification for someone to commit an illegal act upon you.

        Jim, Get Real.

        Only the racists and the retarded believe Zimmerman's nonsense!

        Have you listened to the tapes?

        All people who listened to Zimmerman's call, to 911, heard the tape.

        The "order" that the dispatcher gave to Zimmerman was that they did not NEED him to follow Martin.

        Jim, you are playing games.

        The police dispatcher's statement to Ole George that "we do not need for you to do that, is a common sense directive, a command, an order. Within a span of just several months, do you know that Zimmerman called 911, 41 times? He called 911 ranting about seeing "suspicious black men?"

        By the police, no such suspicious Black men were ever found.

        Zimmerman's calls to 911 form an accurate picture of his racist' mind.

        He was running at the time by the sound on the tape

        If he was running, he was running toward Trayvon.

        He says OK, and then the running sounds stop.

        If you believe your above statement, you will believe all of your fabrications.

        By Zimmerman, an "OK," does not have significance.

        Zimmerman was in pursuit of Trayvon

        Needlessly, Zimmerman killed Trayvon.

        Now as for the lying to the court about money, if he did, then he should be held accountable.

        If he will lie to the court, for sure he will lie about his actions in the murder of Trayvon.

        The honest people seeking legal justice thank God that Zimmerman has been caught in a lie.

        It is good that he is being "held accountable."

        Judge Lester has revoked his bail!

        As for the second passport, does he really have it?

        From you, more junk.

        If he talked in "code" to hide his finances, he knew about his second passport.

        Who knows, maybe Zimmerman had plans to flee the country.

        Did he just lose one and get another one

        The facts are against your support of this killer. Jim, you have decided to grasp at straws.

        so the government shows he has two but he really only has one and he turned it into the court?

        Tell your above last "point" to prosecutor Angela Cory. She just might believe you.

        What a "trickster" you are attempting to be.

        Send Zimmerman to prison!

        • 7 votes
        #1.104 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 3:57 AM EDT

        -Anna-

        And ironically he is not even allowed to use that money, but yet the judge revokes his bail based on said money.

        correction: Zimmerman was caught defying the court.

        Anna, apparently, do you know the law better than the judge?

        • 4 votes
        #1.105 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 4:07 AM EDT

        And ironically he is not even allowed to use that money, but yet the judge revokes his bail based on said money. anna #1.103

        there is jailhouse tape of geozim and his wife talking in code about the money in an effort to keep it a secret. because he is not able to use the money at this time does not mean he could not have used it to post bond. even if the funds were unavailable to him he's not entitled to withhold financial information.

        geozim lied to his counsel and his wife lied to the court.

        • 7 votes
        #1.106 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 4:20 AM EDT

        Yes, Irene, a lie was put before the court.

        If Judge Lester had known about the $135,000, he probably would have set Zimmerman's bail higher.

        Zimmerman was aiming for lower bail.

        Therefore, he lied.

        • 5 votes
        #1.107 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 6:33 AM EDT

        MoonWolf99

        A thug picked a fight with the wrong man

        The NAACP slipped the judge some "greens" to make this happen

        Crayon had drugs in his system and was looking to rob someone.

        ...Shouldn't Zimmerman get a reward for ridding the world of yet another thug?

        As a white person, I am shocked and embarrassed by the racist comments on this board! Perhaps I am naive, but I did not realize that racism was still so rampant today. It seems to me that the ONLY reason why people are still defending Zimmerman - even though it becomes more and more apparent that he is a liar - is because he is "white" or, at least, "white enough". The truth will come out - but certainly not out of Zimmerman's mouth!

        Moonwolf99,

        Excellent points.

        Agreed.

        The hateful and racists comments of many of these posters are a staunch reminder that many "Americans" believe that this country's laws should rest on a foundation of 2 societies...separate and unequal. Their selfish and twisted views are bad and pathetic. Their awful comments makes one wonder how many of these hateful posters are White-Anglo Saxon?

        Probably, very few.

        When their ancestors came to America, whether they were the Irish, the Italians, Slovak, etc, history confirms that their forebears were considered low on the "Aryan pecking order." Now, with achievement under their belts, by looking down on other ethnicities, pervertedly, they somehow feel better about themselves.

        Question for you haters?

        How many of you would be accepted into the "British Court?"

        None!

        • 3 votes
        #1.108 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 6:57 AM EDT

        Oh for crying out loud, just shoot Zimmerman and be done with your lynch-man mentality!

        Just because someone doesnt agree with you, they are a racist? Get over yourself already! YOU are the racist!

        • 4 votes
        #1.109 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 10:58 AM EDT

        25Walker

        The hateful and racists comments of many of these posters are a staunch reminder that many "Americans" believe that this country's laws should rest on a foundation of 2 societies...separate and unequal

        That blade has two edges... BOTH sides have had their racist commentators. Starting right with MSNBC.

        • 3 votes
        #1.110 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 11:09 AM EDT

        Zimmerman's credibility mean little considering the credibility of most if not all of the major prosecution witnesses is damaged beyond repair due to the changing of their stories. i don't pretend to know if he was right or wrong or what happened, but the burden of proof is not on him, and the prosecution has little to nothing

        • 1 vote
        #1.111 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 1:00 PM EDT

        I can't wait til this case gets dismissed.

        • 3 votes
        #1.112 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 1:47 PM EDT

        FedupwithFed

        Oh for crying out loud, just shoot Zimmerman and be done with your lynch-man mentality!Just because someone doesnt agree with you, they are a racist? Get over yourself already! YOU are the racist!

        FedupwithFed,

        Your "diversionary" tactic will not work.

        Along with Zimmerman's actions, the posts on this forum demonstrate that racism is alive and still "unwell" in this country. If you do not believe that racism exits, check the history books from 1619 and follow the history down to the latest government statistics on the disparities between jobs, education, health care, housing, etc. Denial will not get you anywhere.

        Your denial of racism is your first step in protecting this long-standing institution.

        You tried, but you failed.

        trust_verify

        That blade has two edges... BOTH sides have had their racist commentators. Starting right with MSNBC.

        What racists commentators are you referring to?

        Here are a few: Limbaugh, O'Reilly and Hannity.

        "Starting with MSNBC."

        In the category of racism, Fox is way out front.

        Jack Smith-2207765

        I can't wait til this case gets dismissed.

        Jack, you will have a very long wait.

        Zimmerman's own attorney says that his client's trial is many months away.

        Lawful people cannot wait for Zimmerman to be convicted.

        George is a killer.

        He needs to hear the sound of his prison door cell closing behind him.

        • 6 votes
        #1.113 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 2:37 PM EDT

        That blade has two edges... BOTH sides have had their racist commentators. Starting right with MSNBC.

        trust_verify #1.110 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 10:09 AM CDT

        and finishing with fox news.

        • 4 votes
        #1.114 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 9:45 PM EDT

        Is anybody out there? Please listen to me all of you
        thinking and reasonable people, we need to stand up and fight for our rights to
        defend ourselves; we cannot sit this one out!!! Way too much is at stake. THE RIGHT
        OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT IS INFRINGED!!! OUR RIGHT TO
        LEGALLY DEFEND OURSELVES AND OUR LOVE ONES IS WHAT'S REALLY AT STAKE HERE.
        Let’s organize ourselves and do just as they did when they started protesting
        and occupying Sanford FL. Let us exercise our right to be heard!!!! I don’t
        know about you guys, but I’m not about to let them put me in a position where a
        man, teenager gang banger or not or any other kind of eminent treat can just do
        as they please without the fear of retaliation. Stand up for our rights let’s
        march and show them that we’re not going to take it!!!

        If you don't want to get hurt, don't you try to hurt me. Mind your own business, don't put yourself in a situation where I will have to defend myself because I will.

        Enough is enough!! Let's end this Bull sh!t!!!!!!

        • 1 vote
        #1.115 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 11:07 PM EDT

        25Walker

        trust_verify

        That blade has two edges... BOTH sides have had their racist commentators. Starting right with MSNBC.

        What racists commentators are you referring to?

        Here are a few: Limbaugh, O'Reilly and Hannity.

        Well lets start with YOURSELF. I stated that they existed on BOTH sides. I never stated there weren't white racist on here... Perhaps you are OVER sensitive or simply in denial... you know that whole Blacks are oppressed minorities and thus cannot possibly be racist. Look at your "reverends" for a (im)perfect example. Tell me MSNBC is not bias leaning towards racist. They are more than happy to report when it is a White on minority crime. They will even twist things as in this case to make the story. But if it is a Black on any crime race fails to make the story... even when there are clear photos and NO QUESTION of the racial makeup of the persons involved. Zombie guy is an example. Marissa Alexander had race mentioned only because the "white" courts were sending her away for 20 years... they forgot to mention that her jury was 7 Blacks and 5 others. They quickly let that story DIE once that information was put out. After all they couldn't skewer Miss Corey since she was just getting started with George.

        • 2 votes
        #1.116 - Sun Jun 3, 2012 6:45 AM EDT

        Im so tired of all these people defending this guy. I dont know if he is a racist or not. I dont know if he killed Trayvon in self defense or not. He hasnt gone to trial yet, the whole story is not out. What I do know is that he has lied to the court about his finances and a second passport. If he is willing to lie to the court about these things, doesnt it make sense that he would lie to save himself over these charges. This is just common sense. You people defelecting the issues are not doing yourself or anyone else any good. Look inside, do you like what you see when you blog your hatred?

        • 4 votes
        #1.117 - Sun Jun 3, 2012 7:25 AM EDT

        thturd, thanks. I keep wondering about that with George and his continuing to act this way.

        • 2 votes
        #1.118 - Sun Jun 3, 2012 2:13 PM EDT

        For me, this changes nothing. However it does show a pattern of horrible judgement. If Z and his attorney feel these funds were not accessible and for defense purposes only, they may not have felt or thought for a minuet that these funds we to be claimed as assets. Second, He has not run off, he turned himself in when required....both times, and did not try to flee. Does this make him guilty of murder, 1st or second degree? Nope. does this make him look worse? You betcha!!!

        • 2 votes
        #1.119 - Sun Jun 3, 2012 5:14 PM EDT

        Beyond all this disgusting racism, there is something here that is as clear as the day to me : Zimmermann and his wife were planning to take the money, take his second passport and flee the country. No, not Mexico, probably Peru or a country that does not have an extradition treaty with the United States. What does that tell us ? Goerge knows he is in trouble . It could not be that he has no confidence in the American court system since his father spent his adult life as a judge ? !

        George Zimmerman acted like a typical drug abuser : unable to control his actions and then too yellow to face the consequences. Yeah, let's legalize !

        • 4 votes
        #1.120 - Sun Jun 3, 2012 7:52 PM EDT

        there is something here that is as clear as the day to me : Zimmermann and his wife were planning to take the money, take his second passport and flee the country.

        You've got it all figured out, don't you? It must be nice to be so much smarter than everyone else. Who could blame him for wanting to flee the country? It's becoming clear that there is no way he will get a fair trial here, because the courts and politicians are too afraid of the mobs. He has no chance at being found not guilty, even if everything happened exactly as he said it did.

        • 2 votes
        #1.121 - Mon Jun 4, 2012 7:23 AM EDT

        Who could blame him for wanting to flee the country? It's becoming clear that there is no way he will get a fair trial here, because the courts and politicians are too afraid of the mobs. He has no chance at being found not guilty, even if everything happened exactly as he said it did. bruce 308647 #1.121

        who could blame him? really?! you blind geozim enthusiast make excuses for every wrong he's done and continues to do.

        all your bleating about geozim not getting a fair trial shows what short memories you all have or you're just desperate to find reasons to blubber 'poor geo'. remember casey anthony the most hated woman on the planet? she wasn't convicted of even the slightest charge for the killing of her little daughter.

        he thought he was a big man walking around with a 9mm, then shooting and killing trayvon. now he needs to 'man up' and face the consequences.

        • 2 votes
        #1.122 - Mon Jun 4, 2012 2:41 PM EDT

        For those like Smyth who choose to mince words declaring that G Zimmerman was not following in his car after the 911 Operator? ARE YOU GUYS IDIOTS OR BLIND? G Zimmerman was on foot when he caught up to Treyvon Martin. So how the F' did G Zimmerman meet up with T Martin. Let me remind you, this means that G Zimmerman was carrying his gun getting out of his car when he chose to FOLLOW OR STALK on foot!!!!

        Get it through your freaking head, G Zimmerman ignored the 911 operator's instruction of dis-engage!!!! G Zimmer chose to ignore the instruction and chose to confront. It is you who are BLIND.

        TommyLee...Second, G Zimmerman lied under oath to avoid jail time in regards to (1) second passport (2) financial situation. So please explain how the jurors are to expect him to tell the truth when G Zimmerman will be facing more jail time if found guilty. G Zimmerman thinks he is above the law (may be a little or a lot), but compounded by stupidity. No, it appears exactly like how the prosecutor charged him with... G Zimmerman put himself in a position to committ a crime that he did not have intention of committing in the first place. However, there is not excuse for ignorance nor stupidity. We humans have long protected the weak as we alllowed the victims of Darwinism to thrive under our noses. So there you have it. I wish I have the power to put them in your home with yorur family.

        • 1 vote
        #1.123 - Mon Jun 4, 2012 4:46 PM EDT

        thturd

        Get it through your freaking head, G Zimmerman ignored the 911 operator's instruction of dis-engage!!!! G Zimmer chose to ignore the instruction and chose to confront. It is you who are BLIND.

        You were there? You have the surveillance tapes? George was out of his vehicle and on foot before he was ADVISED "We do not need you to do that". Mind that this was AFTER the same dispatcher had said words to the effect of "let us know what he is doing".

        But seriously... why are we debating this still? We all have our opinions based on the details in the 183 page report and all the rumors and half facts. Lets see where George ends up on bail and then trial. There is nothing to be gained at this point until at least the release of the "sealed" information. Then we can all twist was is released once again.

        • 2 votes
        #1.124 - Mon Jun 4, 2012 4:56 PM EDT

        trust_verify: Don't understand your point. I hope you are not suggesting that you were there as a witness? So give me a break. G Zimmerman was informed not to continue persuit several times. Yes, there was atleast once that he was in the car. "let us know what he is doing" is pretty straight forward question. What was the person doing???? Let me see.... I can probably think of a few thing... WALKING, DRINKING, EATING, TALKING ON THE CELL PHONE, LOOKING BACK AT ME.... You have got to be crazy if you think that the Police will ask a person so that he will shadow a suspect...

        • 2 votes
        #1.125 - Mon Jun 4, 2012 8:11 PM EDT

        "let us know what he is doing" is pretty straight forward question. What was the person doing???? Let me see.... I can probably think of a few thing... WALKING, DRINKING, EATING, TALKING ON THE CELL PHONE, LOOKING BACK AT ME.... You have got to be crazy if you think that the Police will ask a person so that he will shadow a suspect...

        thturd #1.125

        thturd, geozim does not appear to be too sharp (he seems a few bricks short of a low) so if the dispatcher actually said "let us know what he is doing" he may have thought he could take the liberty of following trayvon. if what was said was "what is he doing?" even geozim should have been able to conclude that they were questioning 'what was he doing at that moment?'

        • 1 vote
        #1.126 - Mon Jun 4, 2012 11:37 PM EDT

        I can probably think of a few thing... WALKING, DRINKING, EATING, TALKING ON THE CELL PHONE, LOOKING BACK AT ME.... You have got to be crazy if you think that the Police will ask a person so that he will shadow a suspect...

        Never have I claimed to have been there. Never claimed to KNOW what happened. Based on the evidence we have however the only think we KNOW is that there was a physical altercation and Trayvon got shot.

        What is interestingly, though you have the same evidence everyone else has; you have Trayvon doing things that were not done and would have been near impossible to see.

        Walking... yes that would be visible... even walking quickly or as reported running
        Drinking... The container of tea was never opened. It was INSIDE his hoodie and only discovered once rescue efforts began
        Eating.... Again found in his pocket and unopened
        Talking on a cell phone... We know that now but the phone does not appear to have been visible at a distance (something in his hand) and he was using earbuds. That would explain his "looks like he is on drugs" but not visible at NIGHT at a distance.

        As Irene noted, George was/is a few bricks shy of a full load. (never been in debate). I never suggested police would SUGGEST shadowing but it could be interpreted wrongly by George. Even later 9-1-1 callers were asked to LOOK out their windows while the fight was happeneing. Suggesting SOME push to get more information. Have to take Georges mindset at the moment, based on past interactions, into account. "Give us more information". It is VERY possible George got as far as he did before being advised "we don't need you to do that"... He is dumb enough to just hang out until police arrive... "see this is where is was when I could no longer find the suspect" or words to that effect when police caught up to George. "start 'here' "

        • 1 vote
        #1.127 - Tue Jun 5, 2012 7:29 AM EDT

        thturd:

        Get it through your freaking head, G Zimmerman ignored the 911 operator's instruction of dis-engage!!!! G Zimmer chose to ignore the instruction and chose to confront. It is you who are BLIND.

        Please just send the evidence or links to it, that proves what you're saying is correct! GZ responded when the dispatcher told him we don't need you to follow him, by saying "OK". He then spent the next several moments communicating personal details to the dispatcher and planning when/where he'd meet the officers who were on the way. During that time, he clearly wasn't out of breath anymore, and admitted he didn't know where the kid was.
        I'm very interested to read the evidence you have that proves he ignored the dispatcher and continued to chase Martin (and how he was able to carry on that conversation while chasing down a younger, lighter, high school athlete). Please share it with us all. Thanks!

        • 2 votes
        #1.128 - Tue Jun 5, 2012 2:56 PM EDT
        Reply

        Given the liberal media hype and racist rhetoric from the left I can understand why Zimmerman would flee - he stands about zero chance of getting a fair trial. however, bail, as I understand it, is based on two things; risk to the community and risk of flight. If he surrenders that second passport, he's no greater risk to the community or of flight than he was before the discovery of the passport, so he should free on bail pending trial and, if so adjudged, conviction.

        • 83 votes
        #2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:31 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarVanessafromDCExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        What have you been smoking??? You sound like the racist to me. Trevon was Judged, stalked and murdered....was that fair????

        • 85 votes
        #2.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:40 PM EDT

        Vanessa where does he sound racist?

        • 67 votes
        #2.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:49 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarwascigarmanExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        Yes, it was fair the way that the whole thing turned out. It was Zimmermans right and job to stop people not known to the community. As it turns out, Martin was a wannebe thug, thief, and a wanabee gangsta who had no respect for authority. Had Martin not attacked Zimmerman, nothing would have happened. In Florida, we all have a right to protect our property and our neighborhoods, and we will continue to do so. All of you Thugs, Thieves and Gangstas had better stay out of our neighborhoods, we are all armed, come on down and meet your maker.

        • 87 votes
        #2.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:50 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarbrendan-4Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        Vanessa is refusing to accept that Trayvon beat the living hell out of George prior to being shot. Considering witness testimony and crime scene photography back up these claims, the racist one here is Vanessa by condeming Zimmerman without a true trial.

        • 115 votes
        #2.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:51 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarLMarcTExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        I gotta side with oldgaffer here. Too late though, his bail was revoked.

        • 15 votes
        #2.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:52 PM EDT

        If he wanted to flee he would have already been gone by now.

        • 69 votes
        #2.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:54 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarEric-913730Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        It's called "projection" where you accuse someone else of something that you are doing.

        Thus, "Given the liberal media hype and racist rhetoric from the left"

        We can deduce that the person that wrote this is racist.

        • 31 votes
        #2.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:59 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarpzphimlExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        Thanks for that eyewitness first hand account there VanessafromDC. Without that information that you saw with your own eyes we would not know what happened.

        Hypocrite. Fair to say what happened without all the facts? Get a life and stop being racist.

        • 76 votes
        #2.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:59 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarDon41331Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        I think VanessafromDC sounds racist to me. She sounds like she's already tried and convicted Zimmmerman before there's even been a trial. If Zimmerman was black he wouldn't receive this kind nonsense.

        Besides, where would Zimmerman flee to where he wouldn't be brought back? Iran? Cuba?

        Puh-leease...

        • 72 votes
        #2.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:02 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarartsyladyRestored

        brendan4... exactly how did Trayvon beat the 'living hell' out of George? He had a broken nose and several cuts. That's not exactly 'living hell.' To me beating the living hell out of somebody would mean broken ribs, broken extremity bones, concussion, missing teeth, etc. How do you know what happened? Were you there? Ummm... no. Didn't think so. How do you know Trayvon wasn't simply protecting himself. Bottom line... Zimmerman got out of the car, armed and looking for trouble EVEN AFTER HE WAS TOLD MY 911 OPERATOR TO STAY IN THE CAR.

        I HOPE ZIMMERMAN IS FOUND GUILTY AND GETS THE MAXIMUM SENTENCE. He's dangerous cop wannabe. Period.

        • 65 votes
        #2.10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:04 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarguy-2789881Restored

        Old...He was caught lying to the Court. Judges tend to frown on that. He is a thug that picked on a kid and when he couldnt beat him in a fair fight he blew him away. Facing 25 to life, Florida will revoke bail for a liar.

        • 71 votes
        #2.11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:05 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarDon41331Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        I HOPE ZIMMERMAN IS FOUND GUILTY AND GETS THE MAXIMUM SENTENCE. He's dangerous cop wannabe. Period.

        YEAH WELL I'M GLAD YOU'RE NOT ON THE JURY. That's a relief. Period.

        • 57 votes
        #2.12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:07 PM EDT

        I continue to be amazed how people who so often demand personal responsibility can so quickly claim that everyone is out to get them! How can anyone claim that the media has a liberal desire to harass Whites with money? The media is composed of Whites with money!!!!! George, enjoy your time in jail while the system works to give you a speedy trial.

        • 35 votes
        #2.13 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:07 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarCandlewyckeExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        Actually Don41331 Vanessa cant be a racist. She is black and therefore is automatically a victim no matter what the circumstances. Does that make me sound racist? Oh well At least I take pride in calling her out for the content of her lack of character and here misplaced moral indignation and if that means I am a racist then I guess I can wear that title with pride.

        • 60 votes
        #2.14 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:08 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarStMillerRestored

        I always come back to the thought that Zimmerman went looking for trouble with a loaded gun...created the trouble for himself...caused a situation where that trouble resulted in an innocent person's death...then acts shocked that he found trouble.

        So many people are willing to support his claim of self-defense but is it really self-defense when you cause the trouble you're in.

        It's like a one man Ox Bow incident.

        • 88 votes
        #2.15 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:08 PM EDT

        So it's ok if you're getting beat up and not winning the fight that you pull out a gun and shoot someone? WOW really!

        • 44 votes
        #2.16 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:09 PM EDT

        I agree the media wants Zimmerman. But they wanted Casey Anthony too. There simply isn't enough evidence to convict. Zimmerman walks.
        End of story.

        • 32 votes
        #2.17 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:09 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarLorr-2611132Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        wascigarman

        Yes, it was fair the way that the whole thing turned out. It was Zimmermans right and job to stop people not known to the community. As it turns out, Martin was a wannebe thug, thief, and a wanabee gangsta who had no respect for authority. Had Martin not attacked Zimmerman, nothing would have happened. In Florida, we all have a right to protect our property and our neighborhoods, and we will continue to do so. All of you Thugs, Thieves and Gangstas had better stay out of our neighborhoods, we are all armed, come on down and meet your maker.

        Please tell me you are not a parent. Travon Martin on that day was not a Thug, Thieves or Ganstas and people like you should not be given a license to carry a gun - you need to be under a doctor's care.

        • 54 votes
        #2.18 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:11 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarbrendan-4Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        artsylady, did you not see news reports of neighbors as witnesses giving statements about how they observed trayvon on top of george beating him up? do you just refuse to accept that they gave testimony?

        a 911 operator is not a cop, therefor has no authority to make demands.

        • 25 votes
        #2.19 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:11 PM EDT

        @artsylady - gz was NEVER told to stay in his car... when he was ASKED not to follow - HE WAS ALREADY OUT OF HIS CAR(TRUCK)...

        also, there is no evidence he was looking for trouble

        • 29 votes
        #2.20 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:12 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarlynnnnRestored

        He lied to the judge.....the same judge who will preside over a trail where his credibility will be a factor.

        I watched this on TV the judge was pi ssed. If any of you have missed this until now

        Zimmerman is not very smart

        • 53 votes
        #2.21 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:12 PM EDT

        Actually Don41331 Vanessa cant be a racist. She is black and therefore is automatically a victim no matter what the circumstances. Does that make me sound racist?

        Nope, not by me. But I'll bet she would.

        Oh well At least I take pride in calling her out for the content of her lack of character and here misplaced moral indignation and if that means I am a racist then I guess I can wear that title with pride.

        Good point. But as long as we're throwing the "r" word around, we might as well make it more meaningless than it should be.

        • 8 votes
        #2.22 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:12 PM EDT

        So, no consequences for misleading a judge by withholding information?

        • 28 votes
        #2.23 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:12 PM EDT
        Comment author avatargofins-4159157Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        fedupwithfed needs to be taught a life lesson. I wish I could be there to witness it. And I'm white. Tool.

        • 8 votes
        #2.24 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:13 PM EDT

        He should have turned over both passports and been honest about his finances from the start. Now it looks to the court like he was lying. Once you're caught being less than up front with the court, "well, if he wanted to run he would have by now, well, any normal person would want to run, he won't get a fair trial, blah blah blah" that means nothing to the court. the only thing that matters is that he was not completely forthcoming. Let this be a lesson to anyone who is on trial and things "eh, the court/judge doesn't need to know about this."

        • 29 votes
        #2.25 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:13 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarbayllieRestored

        oldgaffer-1714383

        Given the liberal media hype and racist rhetoric from the left I can understand why Zimmerman would flee - he stands about zero chance of getting a fair trial.

        Zimmerman decided to be the police, prosecutor, judge and jury so I would say he is getting a FAIRER trial than the person he targetted.

        • 52 votes
        #2.26 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:14 PM EDT

        Except for the fact that lying to the court is considered contempt, and punishable by jail.

        • 30 votes
        #2.27 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:17 PM EDT

        wascigarman

        Yes, it was fair the way that the whole thing turned out. It was Zimmermans right and job to stop people not known to the community

        Zimmerman had no right to stop anyone - the only right he had was call the police.

        Sorry but the only people I will allow to stop & question me is the police - not some police wanna-be.

        • 55 votes
        #2.28 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:17 PM EDT

        Every single person on this thread that supports Zimmerman would have fought back against his aggressive approaches that night like Martin did. None of you can honestly tell me that if some guy like that basically stalked you through a neighborhood that you knew you had a right to be in...came up to you and put a hand on you that you would not have fought back.

        • 47 votes
        #2.29 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:17 PM EDT

        Pretty much every defense attorney that had his/her say on all the networks indicate the case against Zimmerman is weak and that he will be acquitted if it goes to trial, and many of them say the case may even be dismissed before it goes to trial.
        So what to do? They will keep Zimmerman in jail for as long as possible, any way they can.

        • 15 votes
        #2.30 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:17 PM EDT

        Fairer trial? It was put as self defense until the media turned it into a circus. It is okay to shoot someone if you are being beat up and they go for your gun.

        • 15 votes
        #2.31 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:18 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarwascigarmanExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        I certainly hope that you are correct. We need more Zimmermans out protecting our neighborhoods in Florida.

        • 26 votes
        #2.32 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:19 PM EDT

        Samson, don't play dumb. You know good and well what StMiller's statement meant. Zimmerman was the aggressor up to the point when Trayvon Martin decided to confront his aggressor and, up to the point when Trayvon was shot at close range in the chest, was successful in that regard. Even then it could be argued, assuming evidence supports it, that Trayvon Martin was defending himself during the pre-shooting phase of the altercation. If the evidence demonstrates that Zimmerman did everything right in terms of his assertion that he was on neighborhood watch, then he will, likely, be exonerated. However, if he failed to do that, if the evidence doesn't support that assertion, then Zimmerman will, likely, be convicted and sentenced. Don't play the Stupid card just for show. Indeed, don't play the Stupid card at all. None of the best people do.

        • 23 votes
        #2.33 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:19 PM EDT

        brendan-4

        artsylady, did you not see news reports of neighbors as witnesses giving statements about how they observed trayvon on top of george beating him up? do you just refuse to accept that they gave testimony?

        no such witnesses exist. Stop making $hit up. Not one witness has said that he/she is 100% sure that Martin was on top.

        • 29 votes
        #2.34 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:19 PM EDT

        Mike....I would have agreed. When they made it murder 2 I thought, no way they convict. But it looks like the prosecutor knows more than we do if they are worried about him running. He's toast.

        • 19 votes
        #2.35 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:20 PM EDT

        fedupwithfed needs to be taught a life lesson. I wish I could be there to witness it. And I'm white. Tool.

        Is that a threat?

        • 9 votes
        #2.36 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:20 PM EDT

        wascigarman

        I certainly hope that you are correct. We need more Zimmermans out protecting our neighborhoods in Florida.

        you mean people who assault women and police officers? You mean people who lie in court?

        • 40 votes
        #2.37 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:20 PM EDT

        Cigar...If you need thugs like Z to protect you, you are in trouble.

        • 38 votes
        #2.38 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:22 PM EDT

        He lied to a judge, he should know better than that, his father is a judge. His bail was revoked for two reasons passport and he lied about his finances

        • 31 votes
        #2.39 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:23 PM EDT

        What's sad is 19 people so far bumped Vanessa's ignorant and subconsciously racist comment (she admitted her own racism by externalizing that flaw onto others via projection). It never ceases to amaze me how racist some people are, and then accuse others of racism. White racists do it, and so do racists of color appraently.

        People are such ignorant tools sometimes.

        You sound like the racist to me

        And you sound like a racist idiot to me...so I guess we're even now. Go back to your collectivist thinking where race is important.

        • 15 votes
        #2.40 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:23 PM EDT

        If he wanted to flee he would have already been gone by now.

        joe the plummer #2.6

        it not only about jumping bail it's about lying about being indigent to get a low bond.

        • 18 votes
        #2.41 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:23 PM EDT

        Joe for Z....It was self defense until some light was put on the good ol boy network.

        • 15 votes
        #2.42 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:24 PM EDT

        ProIndividual-3906907 - I'm not sure about whether or not someone is this thread is racist, but I definitely agree with you that everyone is potentially a racist regardless of their own race.

        The best line regarding racism is "There is no such thing as reverse racism. It's just racism."

        • 14 votes
        #2.43 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:26 PM EDT

        Its funny, you same people are all attacking Vanessa for her comments but ignore the other dozen comments saying how Zimerman is a victim. If nobody knows the facts then why are you not riping apart their statements? I think we all know the answer to that, Vannessa has a picture up. No matter how many ways you all try to hide and mask your prejudice it will always come out in the end.

        As far as Zimmerman's bail beign revoked I am not sure why some of you are so confused. Bail is based on your ability to pay as well (as one of you left out) and if you don't disclose $150 grand then why would you be surprised about this? Zimmerman did this to himself, like the other gentleman said 2 posts above me, Zimmerman was not then and is not now, vey smart.

        • 29 votes
        #2.44 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:27 PM EDT

        Great Post Candlewycke, could not have said it better! It is ashamed that it is that way, but apparantly it always will be. 150 or so years ago and it is still present that the White people are rascist but Black people are not! If it is OK to bring that up can I call the Romans rascist and attack them without worry for killing so many Christians long ago? I guess you and I Candle will be wearing that title together with pride. When was the last time you heard a hate crime with a White being the victim and the Black being the accused?

        • 5 votes
        #2.45 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:27 PM EDT

        wascigarman - You could not be more wrong! It was neither Zimmerman's right nor his job to stop anyone. At best, he was a self appointed vigilante with no record of any training. Your saying Martin was a wannabe thug or gangsta is also not supported by any evidence except a preconceived notion that any young kid in a hoodie is out for trouble regardless of the color of his skin. It's disturbing that there are already dozens of people who agree with you. If Zimmerman stayed home with his prescription drugs that night we'd all be occupied by something else.

        • 29 votes
        #2.46 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:28 PM EDT

        Given the liberal media hype and racist rhetoric from the left I can understand why Zimmerman would flee - he stands about zero chance of getting a fair trial.

        My my my a man murders an unarmed child and all you have in his defense are old tired excuses for someone that is a phantom. Please explain what "Liberal media" you are talking about as it has been proved time and time again that does not exist except in the minds of right wing nut cases who appear to be afraid of their shadow. From the left? About 15-20% of the nation is in you stupid corener with you so that makes the other 80% leftists? You see if you are not on board with every nutty thing the right believes you are at best a rhino and that makes you a lefty. Where were you righties when lefties took this country from the depression to number one in the world only to hand it back to you guys and right away you almost did the depression thing again. Get a life grow up and post your crap on one of those right wing boards with the confederate flags waving they have no place anywhere else.

        • 24 votes
        #2.47 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:28 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarhollywoodundergroundExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        Yes, it was fair the way that the whole thing turned out. It was Zimmermans right and job to stop people not known to the community. As it turns out, Martin was a wannebe thug, thief, and a wanabee gangsta who had no respect for authority. Had Martin not attacked Zimmerman, nothing would have happened. In Florida, we all have a right to protect our property and our neighborhoods, and we will continue to do so. All of you Thugs, Thieves and Gangstas had better stay out of our neighborhoods, we are all armed, come on down and meet your maker.

        TRANSLATION: That "N*gger" didn't give proper respect and should have followed the orders of a white when told to stop on a public street and deserved to get shot. They don't have the same rights as whites do....when are they going to learn that?

        • 22 votes
        #2.48 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:29 PM EDT

        oldgaffer-1714383

        Given the liberal media hype and racist rhetoric from the left

        And the left is so racist that we nominated and consequentially elected the first black president ever. Yes - what a bunch of racists we are. Dolt.

        • 19 votes
        #2.49 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:31 PM EDT

        It has been noted by the coroner and the funeral director that there were no signs of Trayvon Martin beating anyone. There was a small cut on his ring finger - nothing more. No bruising or ripped skin as there would have been had he beaten anyone. And, even though Martin had trace amounts of marijuana in his sytem, Zimmerman had three types of drugs in his.

        It is entirely plausible that someone else beat Zimmerman earlier and he was out for revenge. The evidence certainly supports that.

        Plus, three witnesses who were told what to say by police the night of the murder have now changed their accounts - saying Trayvon was NOT beating Zimmerman.

        It will be an interesting trial. Too bad Zimmerman didn't act like an adult and let the police deal with someone who had every right to be exactly where he was. But, the showoff had to kill an innocent.

        • 27 votes
        #2.50 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:31 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarrobbopaloobopExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        StMiller

        Every single person on this thread that supports Zimmerman would have fought back against his aggressive approaches that night like Martin did. None of you can honestly tell me that if some guy like that basically stalked you through a neighborhood that you knew you had a right to be in...came up to you and put a hand on you that you would not have fought back.

        Probably right...except that it didn't happen the way you state.

        Mr. Martin made an unprovoked attack on Mr. Zimmerman because he thought he could get away with beating up his smaller, weaker opponent.

        Too bad for him that Zimmerman was armed and not the easy victim that Martin thought he was.

        • 8 votes
        #2.51 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:33 PM EDT

        How do we know that Zimmerman didn't do a CYA by self-inflicting the injuries?

        • 19 votes
        #2.52 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:35 PM EDT

        Just one question. If someone was following you and you thought that you could make them stop by punching them out and while they were out of it get away, would you. Now ask the same question of yourself as though you were a teenager. Zimmerman had no legal right to be following Martin.

        • 22 votes
        #2.53 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:35 PM EDT

        This case has been heard everywhere...how can he have a fair trial? Some are saying that he got off at first cause he was not black? Really? He was not aressted at first because the law in Flordia protected what he did. This case is not about color...it's about what really happened that night and I am sure so much more will be brought out that the media has not chosen to put out there. Yes it's very sad that a young man's life was taken, but some are just going by that this guy just went out and shot him down, in which this is not the case. If Zimmerman wanted to leave he would have done so. But no he has shown up and now has to go back to jail? Why because so many are calling this a race issue. Also if anyone wants to give him money who cares it's their choice! Sad that this guy will never get a fair trial. I live far away from where this happened and I could not even be on the jury cause I keep hearing about this case everyday. From day one all I have seen is attacks onZimmerman...mourn the young man that died and celebrate the life he did live!

        • 4 votes
        #2.54 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:36 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarDoes it really-matter huhExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

        Vanessa is a racist. To say Zimmerman is a racist is false. Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson are racist. Stand out on the street corners and use a horrible thing like this to spread their racist hatred for white people. Leave color out of it and don't hold court out on the street corner.

        • 7 votes
        #2.55 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:37 PM EDT

        oldgaffer-1714383

        Given the liberal media hype and racist rhetoric from the left I can understand why Zimmerman would flee - he stands about zero chance of getting a fair trial.

        Maybe Zimmerman should have stayed in his car, and not stalked this kid after the 911 dispatcher told him not to follow the kid.

        Zimmerman is a trigger happy racist. That;'s what it comes down to. He called the kid a coon on the 911 call.

        Also, as stated in the article, he has a second passport, and had all that hidden cash he didn't reveal to the court. He's a flight risk, and he needs to stay in jail until the trial begins and is over.

        Lock this pos away.

        • 15 votes
        #2.56 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:37 PM EDT

        Travon Martin had every right to defend himself from George Zimmerman if the guy was following him behind houses and down the street.. The stand your ground Law states: that if you feel indangered you have the right to use Deadly Force, If George was following me down the street and behind house's, Ol' George might have never got off the ground, because i would be exercising my own stand your ground law until he wasn't able to move. And every1 saying this is about race is just stupid,it's about Justice.. If only our white community would stand up when injustice happens,Casey Anothony,OJ Simpson just to name a few, would be in jail..So don't hate on our other races fighting for Justice..

        • 21 votes
        #2.57 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:38 PM EDT

        robbopaloobop - 5'11 158 lbs vs 5'8 200 lbs would never cause even the dumbest person to think "that is a smaller, weaker opponent". And he did stalk Martin through the neighborhood. TM's conversation with his girlfriend states that:

        "Martin's girlfriend said that he described a man as "crazy and creepy," who was on the phone watching him from a vehicle, before the man started following him. The friend said that she told Martin to run to the townhouse, where he was staying with his father and the father's girlfriend. She said that Martin told her that he had lost the man and then noticed he was being pursued again."

        • 18 votes
        #2.58 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:38 PM EDT
        Comment author avatarJeanne Donaldsonvia Facebook

        It's no surprise his bail was revoked, he lied to the court more than once. Something stinks about Zimmerman's story. Number one , he was told to back off by the police and he didn't. he followed. Two, he wasn't supposed to be armed as a neighborhood watchman. Three, he did approach and confront the kid. It's really no surprise that if a young man is roughly approached from behind in the dark that when confronted he might slug who he thinks is an attacker. Where the story gets stinky is it was reported that Martin was sitting on Zimmermans chest and beating him. How did Zimmerman reach around Martins body to extract his gun from its holster? Therefore he must have had it in his hand already when he confronted Martin or it was Zimmerman who was on top when Martin was shot.

        • 15 votes
        #2.59 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:39 PM EDT

        He was given bail, he was revoked bail because he was dishonest.

        that alone calls into question his entire account of what went down.

        Brendan "artsylady, did you not see news reports of neighbors as witnesses giving statements about how they observed trayvon on top of george beating him up?"

        apparently you didnt see the news reports where they are all changing their stories, and none of them actually saw martin attack zimmerman. so IF zimmerman attacked martin first, wouldnt he be allowed to defend himself and POSSIBLY end up winning that fist fight?

        i mean, fists cant be guns...obviously, we know that now...dont we?

        • 18 votes
        #2.60 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:40 PM EDT

        St Miller hmm you must be a saint to know what happened that night putting a hand on him the poor sweet 13 year old oops sorry 17 and maybe not so sweet. Why is it that the media still insists on using the old photo and not the photo from the night of the shooting???

        • 4 votes
        #2.61 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:41 PM EDT

        STMILLER

        I believe most of the REAL MEN on this blog would have kicked Zimmermam's A-s when they saw that GUN just as the KID did.

        The rest of them that can't understand that he had NO right to question this kid about anything would have just stood there and than bent over for Little Ole Georgie.

        He should have taken his a-s back to the truck like the Cop's told him to, but the GUN gave him FAlSE COURAGE.

        Zimmerman raised money from people and then cried broke... that's what this is about. I don't know when people are going to realize... this guy is a murderer and a loser.

        • 22 votes
        #2.62 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:41 PM EDT

        I believe that there was a fight and that Trayvon about some point was getting the best of Zimmerman. But I think that's irrelevant. Who started the fight? Did Trayvon think he could get away? If he ran, would Zimmerman shoot him? After all, he did approach him with a gun. I think this can't be proven. I think Zimmerman will walk, but I think he is getting what he deserves by having to live through the horror which is now his life. God will give out justice in the end.

        • 8 votes
        #2.63 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:42 PM EDT

        Just one little lie can turn into a mountain of lies.

        And since we are literally hearing only Zim's side of the story--maybe the time has come for truth

        to be told. The head images: 1st image publized showed nothing/nada, then--- the next one claims to have a huge scratch or laceration, yet when shown days later--it wasn't a gash, or laceration for the scratch were in diverse directions.? The broken nose, I didn't see any swelling, black eyes or even hurtful redness on his nose, did you?

        And wouldn't you think that a Security Guard--Neighborhood watchman---would have some training in protection, defense negotiation prior to being hired. And he was instructed to wait for backup by superiors and he chose to not follow that and pursue the person of interest.

        • 8 votes
        #2.64 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:44 PM EDT

        Zimmerman is a danger to society. Who goes and want to play cop wannabee follow someone because to him he looks suspicious cause he's black and wear a hoodie on a rainy night. Well I dont like stupid looking people does that give me a right to shoot him. They were no self defense here, not when you go and put yourself in a situation because of your own stupidity. And I do not believe Zim statements or most of these account witnesses on either sides. Zim has his version and the kid is dead. All of you here come up with situations and facts that are just totally incorrect. As for Zim's wounds a little bit of blood looks terrible on a pic. Those wounds are nothing and that is the reasonn why he didnt go to hospital or police did not insist on taking him.

        Zim is a muderer whether he killed a black kid, a thief or a drug addict. He killed someone he knew nothing of. All he had were assumptions and because of his messed up thinking he let his prejudice get the best of him. I am not saying that it is necessary because Trayvan was black but it is because of Zim's thinking that black people are up to no good. And that is why he followed him and what ensued he is guilty of whether Trayvan attacked him or not. He is still guilty because had he not made a bad decision he would not have killed someone. He put himself in that situation and he took a life and he must accept the repercussion and consequences of his bad decision. There is a price he has to pay otherwhise we can all go kill right and left on our own misconception and misjudgenments.

        And my views have nothing to do with racism has to do with you make a fatal decision you must pay for the results.

        • 15 votes
        #2.65 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:47 PM EDT

        Jeanne "Where the story gets stinky is it was reported that Martin was sitting on Zimmermans chest and beating him. How did Zimmerman reach around Martins body to extract his gun from its holster? Therefore he must have had it in his hand already when he confronted Martin or it was Zimmerman who was on top when Martin was shot."

        Im not sure you stated that correctly, he wouldnt have reached around martin's body.

        But you would think, if someone has you "pinned to the ground" you're already laying on your own gun right?

        or if the holster is on the side, wouldnt martins legs have felt a gun holster?

        or if the gun was in front, wouldnt martin have been sitting on it?

        clearly it was already in his hands...and martin was trying to save his life, by bringing fists to a gun fight. he lost.

        • 10 votes
        #2.66 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:47 PM EDT

        Eric-913730

        It's called "projection" where you accuse someone else of something that you are doing.

        Thus, "Given the liberal media hype and racist rhetoric from the left"

        We can deduce that the person that wrote this is racist.

        Ok Eric by your logic VanessafromDC is a racist as well because she is "projecting" when she infers oldgaffer-1714383 is a racist

        Therefore by following your logic of "projection" we can assume you are also a racist because you in turn are accusing oldgaffer-1714383 of being a racist by your insightful deduction.

        • 6 votes
        #2.67 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:48 PM EDT

        To all you people that think Zimmerman was wrong here, you all need to take a good look at the law. There was a good reason Z wasn't arrested that night. The Law didn't allow for it, plain and simple. Talk about Double Jeopardy. The people of Fl. passed that law. Where does the State get off stepping in and trying this case when it is there law that protects Zimmerman. I live in MI and we have the Castle Law here witch the SYG law is just a bit stronger. I am a Lib but I like that law. I have been in Zimmerman's Shoes. When you can't get the Police to do there job, then you take the law into your own hands to protect yourself and you property. If someone breaks into you house and you shot them, you shouldn't have to defend yourself in court for doing that. The Castle law protects you from that.

        • 5 votes
        #2.68 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:49 PM EDT

        rocky-2318920 - You're definitely right that they should use an updated photo and you're potentially right that maybe he didn't put his hand on Martin. Let's assume that you're right on both points. That still doesn't change the fact that he stalked an innocent person, as the phone call with Martin's girlfriend states, through a neighborhood that Martin had he every right to be in because he stereotyped the kid, then approached him as he was not allowed to do. Can you honestly say you wouldn't have been as recalcitrant as Martin was in that situation?

        • 7 votes
        #2.69 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:50 PM EDT

        Robbopaloobop,

        How are you so certain that Zimmerman did not physically try to detain Martin? And how are you so certain that Martin did not then legally defend himself against Zimmerman's assault? How precisely is it that you can be so certain of the events of that night? The facts are that you cannot, which is why Zimmerman is in jail, and being tried for murder.

        • 8 votes
        #2.70 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:51 PM EDT

        travons constitutional rights were violated -the right to be left alone. we all have the right to walk on a public street unafraid of being molested by a quasi self appointed militia man . there is one innocent victim here -this young man should be alive today --a crime was committed by zimmerman. zimmerman set himself up as judge / jury -----let's see how he likes facing the same.

        • 9 votes
        #2.71 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:52 PM EDT

        Yes, it was fair the way that the whole thing turned out. It was Zimmermans right and job to stop people not known to the community

        To observe and report, not stalk and murder. Neighborhood watch are not police officers, this is why its against the groups rules to carry weapons because just like in low pay security many people become one because they couldn't pass the police exam. As neighborhood watch you have no authority over another person. Had Zimmerman stayed in his car Martin would still be alive.

        Martin is dead we have no way of knowing if Zimmerman said anything to him or grabbed him from behind to get martin to defend himself. We do know that Zimmerman stalked him, when he shouldn't have been, Zimmerman is the aggressor. Had Martin attacked Zimmerman in his car or tried to drag him out his car I would support Zimmerman shooting him.

        • 11 votes
        #2.72 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:52 PM EDT

        Liar, Liar, Pants On Fire!!

        For those who question as to why the bail was revoked, you need a reality check.

        Blatantly lying to a Judge and you think there is no reason to revoke bail? Why? Because you think he was justified in shooting TM?? LOLOLOLOLOL!!! (LMAO so hard I broke my chair!!)

        One has NOTHING WHAT SO EVER to do with the other, however there is the question of his truthfulness, credibility and morality as the Judge (and everyone else in the country...) now knows that he lied to get reduced bail. Now....... I don't see why he's not lying about his whole case....

        I'm Just Sayin'....

        • 12 votes
        #2.73 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:53 PM EDT

        Jeanne, excellent point! How COULD Zimmerman pull a weapon from a holster if Trayvon was sitting on him? It's just not possible. It looks like the witnesses who recanted are correct. It was ZIMMERMAN that was on top and then he pulled the weapon. Between that and the fact that Trayvon's hands were unblemished, it doesn't look good for Zimmerman. Add in that he continually lies to the court, it looks even worse. His story has not jived from the beginning. When a story stinks, it usually means that someone is lying.

        • 6 votes
        #2.74 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:53 PM EDT

        Every single person on this thread that supports Zimmerman would have fought back against his aggressive approaches that night like Martin did. None of you can honestly tell me that if some guy like that basically stalked you through a neighborhood that you knew you had a right to be in...came up to you and put a hand on you that you would not have fought back.

        This is example of what is wrong with this entire situation and why BOTH lawyers were trying to prevent the press access to the case. Presently at no point has it been stated or evidence shown that Mr. Zimmerman "came up to [Mr Martin] and put a hand on him." That is a complete fictional statement until there is evidence present otherwise.

        Another thing about this case is the nature of people stating that Mr. Zimmerman was "stalking" Mr. Martin. Again, that is a major dramization of the situation without any given support. Most places define "stalking" as a repeated following of an individual over a long period of time in order to intimidate them into to some undesired action. There is no evidence given that Mr. Zimmerman followed Mr. Martin over days but only followed him through a area for a short time.

        Also, in most places, "stalking" is not necessarily illegal unless an "restraining order" is issue. Ask any celebratry about this fact. They are "stalked" all the time by fans and the press. The most those celebraties can do is get a court ordered restraining order against the "stalker". Heck, the celebraty tends to be the one that goes to jail (or gets sued) if they lay hands on their "stalker" and do not have that restraining order.

        Then there is the fact that many people call Mr. Martin a "child". Mr. Martin was seventeen years old. While this IS an age that is normally considered of minor status, it is not considered a "child" age. With parent consent, a 17 year old can join the military and can actually be sent to fight in wars. The US military likes their soldiers between the ages of 17 to 30, and have shown that men of that age can easily be useful in the most dangerous situations that combat can offer.

        There is also the case that IF Mr Zimmerman story was correct and IF the situation was reversed where Mr Martin caused the death of Mr Zimmerman and Mr Martin was on trial here, the prosecution would have most likely been trying Mr Martin as an adult due to the nature of the crime and Mr Martin's age at the time.

        In summary, all of this crap around this case being said on these boards and others make great NBC Sunday night movie script, but are just that, a fictional script and not evidence heard by a jury of 12 peers in the US court system.

        • 3 votes
        #2.75 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:54 PM EDT

        Yes, Lets blame everyone but Zimmerman! It's everyone's fault but his! RIGHT?

        Perhaps he be should sent on an all expences paid by "the State of Florida" vacation?

        • 8 votes
        #2.76 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:54 PM EDT

        Does it matter who is beating up who? The facts that we are made aware of is that G Zimmerman persisted in stopping Treyvon Martin even after calls into 911 and after the dispatcher asked G Zimmerman to not continue tailing the suspect. G Zimmerman initiated the confrontation. It is in Treyvon Martin's right to stand his ground! Treyvon Martin is not guilty until he is found guilty... Unless you UNAMERICAN BUNCH wish otherwise. At this point we know that G Zimmerman had a gun when he approached Treyvon Martin, from the 2nd Degree Murder charge, it is unclear if there was an initial intent to shoot Treyvon. However, the fact is that G Zimmerman shot Treyvon, and the incident could have easily been avoided.

        Here are the BS that some of you idiots are drawing up on the minor, Treyvon, when his record is clearly protected because he is a minor.... in another words you idiots know JACK!!! simply repeating whatever you want to believe. As for the revoking G Zimmerman's bail? DUH, if you are caught with lies that clearly contradict with the facts that one was issued the initial bail... whose fault is that???? Now, here is a simple question to you so called NON-RACISTS... WHY DO YOU HAVE A 2ND PASSPORT? MORE IMPORTANTLY WHY DO YOU NOT HAVE REPORTED THAT YOU HAVE A 2ND PASSPORT, WHEN IT WAS CLEAR THAT THE JUDGE ASKED THE DEFENDANT TO TURN OVER ALL PASSPORT (TO ELIMINATE FLIGHT RISK)? Finally, why are some of you are still posting incorrect facts that have been proven otherwise already??? PARTICULAR MOTIVATION OF PAINTING Treyvon martin in a different light????

        Finally, some of you are Freakin Hyprocrites boarding Racist, because remember that Internet and Newsvine do not erase past comments... So why the F do some of you condemned the flight risk in regards to the Hollaway case.

        no, I don't give a crap how big nor if he was on top of G Zimmerman... The fact is that G Zimmerman knew how tall and how big Treyvon was, because G Zimmerman was tailing Treyvon over several blocks...

        FAIR TRAIL FOR ZIMMERMAN??? I really don't give a crap, because all this BS could have been avoided by G Zimmerman. Unfortunately he chose otherwise. Hence, he now has to suffer the consequences. if he is not guilty, then he better get a good lawyer. If you are so gunho about G Zimmerman's innocence, then put your money where your mouth is... CONTRIBUTE TO HIS DEFENSE FUND. a bunch of gutless jackasses, villify a DEAD MINOR....

        • 9 votes
        #2.77 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:55 PM EDT

        Given the liberal media hype and racist rhetoric from the left I can understand why Zimmerman would flee - he stands about zero chance of getting a fair trial. however, bail, as I understand it, is based on two things; risk to the community and risk of flight. If he surrenders that second passport, he's no greater risk to the community or of flight than he was before the discovery of the passport, so he should free on bail pending trial and, if so adjudged, conviction. oldgaffer-1714383 #2

        no one got more negative press than casey anthony and she got off scott free so stop the senseless whining. if the judge decides to allow bail again it should definitely be increased.

        the amount of bail is also determined by how much cash you person has on hand not just whether they're a flight risk. geozim and his wife lied about how much they had on hand.

        inexplicably the judge seems to think geozim's lies about the passports are no big deal. he's in court and a lie is a lie.

        with all the different versions of what allegedly promoted him to shot trayvon this new set of lies is far from surprising.

        • 4 votes
        #2.78 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:56 PM EDT

        robbopaloobop

        Probably right...except that it didn't happen the way you state.

        and you are speculating, too. Are you psychic? Or were you there when it happened? Or you believe a guy that lied to a judge over the dead kid? Oh, yes, the dead kid cannot tell his side of the story because HE IS DEAD!

        Mr. Martin made an unprovoked attack on Mr. Zimmerman because he thought he could get away with beating up his smaller, weaker opponent.

        again, psychic, present at the fight or just believe the liar?

        Too bad for him that Zimmerman was armed and not the easy victim that Martin thought he was.

        Too bad for Martin that he happened to be targeted by some psycho. If Zimmerman ever stopped me, I would have called the police and have him arrested for harassment but I am not a 17-year-old kid who propbably did not think that it was one of his options.

        Hey, any of you Zimmerman lovers want your family members harassed by some psycho cop-wannabes, good for you. But in my neighborhood, we don't play cops, we call the real ones - that's what my tax dollars are for.

        • 11 votes
        #2.79 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:00 PM EDT

        Chuck - you are confused, but maybe that's because you say you've been in Zimmerman's shoes. Zimmerman's shoes carried a man taking powerful hypnotic drugs - a man with no training and no authority but who thought that the bad guys "always get away" and he should confront that person. You can't take your altered mind and pursue an innocent passerby simply because you live nearby and you have a handgun with you, regardless of your precdonceived notions based on...what?

        • 7 votes
        #2.80 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:00 PM EDT

        @ StMiller

        How is making your neighborhood safer causing trouble? I'm not talking about killing someone just because they look suspicious but keeping an eye on your neighbors homes and property after forming a neighborhood watch. If Martin had been informed by his father that there was such a thing maybe he wouldn't have been in such a hurry to confront and beat Mr. Zimmerman. I can only hope this doesn't happen again and I thank the media for bringing it to the world's attention. The longer it stays in the media the longer it may be a deterrent for someone that puts himself in the same situation.

          #2.81 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:01 PM EDT

          I don't care if he is half white or half spanish. He has a previous history of being disrespectful if not violent . You really WANT this type of person defending you Cigar go right ahead. People like this have a way of turning on you so enjoy your monster and hopefully he doesn't come stalking you one night. A child should not have to turn and defend himself to an idiotic grown man who DOES NOT KNOW ALL of his neighbors. I googled the area and it is so BIG he could not KNOW all of his neighbors & people move in and out of neighborhoods all of the time. Trayvon was NOT a thug and NOT attempting to rob or harm ANYONE that particular night. The child was simply on a jaunt from the STORE, going to what was TEMPORARILY HIS HOME (BECAUSE A PARENT,HIS "F.A.T.H.E.R") LIVED in the neighborhood with his new fiance'. My first two children are of divorce so their "HOME" is where ever their dad or I live and if some are too STUPID to get that then there is a problem. Trayvon Martin was on a cellphone call with someone so how this looked like a suspicious person to George is anyones guess. If you ask me Zimmerman has personal problems and Trayvon Martin's path wandered across this idiot at the wrong time. BUT ULTIMELY ZIMMERMAN HAD NO RIGHT! Now stick that in your cigar and smoke it.

          • 9 votes
          #2.82 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:08 PM EDT

          Confused -

          There is no evidence that any "Neighborhood Watch" actually existed. The organization that owns that trademark has said there was no application by that housing complex to become a neighborhood watch community. A real neighborhood watch program is registered with local law enforcement and receives training from them. That training includes a ban on the carrying of weapons while performing watch activities and certainly would include a ban on participation by someone taking powerful hypnotic drugs. What we have here appears to be a self appointed vigilante playing cowboy, who certainly made his community a MORE dangerous place.

          • 9 votes
          #2.83 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:12 PM EDT

          artsylady, did you not see news reports of neighbors as witnesses giving statements about how they observed trayvon on top of george beating him up? do you just refuse to accept that they gave testimony?

          brendan-4, did you see, last week, that several of the statements were recanted concerning who they say they thought were on top?

          Even if Treyvon beat the living daylight out of him, it was Treyvon using self defense. I would had done the same if someone followed and accosted me at night. I would use every energy in my body to fight for my life. If you say that you wouldn't then you are a bold-faced liar.

          • 5 votes
          #2.84 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:42 PM EDT

          Basic fact, If he never pursues Trayvon Martin he never ends up on the ground getting his @ss kicked in the first place. He disobeyed the police dispatcher mistake one. He was riding around playing cop (which he is not one- not even a rent a cop) Mistake two. He cornered the kid mistake three. The kid tried to defend himself. Trayvon was not breaking any law at the time of his murder. He was not wanted by the police on any warrants. Mistake number four. So unless young black men are not allowed to be walking to the 7-11 to buy ice tea and candy he had no reason to follow , harass, & confront Trayvon. Zimmerman was lucky that unlike someyoung black youths Trayvon was unarmed. If not he would be the dead one. Zimmerman was the aggressor and instigator of the trouble. If he had just left the kid alone nothing happens. Except Trayvon makes it home safely to enjoy his ice tea and give his sibling the candy. In America, people - even black people have the right to go to the 7-11 without being followed, harassed etc. Being black is not suspicious behavior.

          • 11 votes
          #2.85 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:51 PM EDT

          Just one answer. Z called the police. He didn't have to follow T. If you call for the police and when they get there, ask 'where's this person', and you respond, 'I don't know, the dispatcher told me I did not have to do that'. If the other 40 some odd times you called for assistance you did the same thing, would you feel good about doing it for free?

          No matter how smart Z is, he was smarter for staying alive. You don't need smarts for getting dead.

          Whether you try with volution or land every punch, the damage was done before the first swing. Stop the nonsense.

          • 1 vote
          #2.86 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:02 PM EDT

          Don't forget the recorded screams of Trayvon....for help...over and over....and over......Zim hand control of him......I would say to hear someone scream like Trayvon was pleading for...Zim had the gun out. Bang!

          • 3 votes
          #2.87 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:32 PM EDT

          What have you been smoking???

          the racist one here is Vanessa by condeming Zimmerman without a true trial.

          We can deduce that the person that wrote this is racist.

          Get a life and stop being racist.

          I think VanessafromDC sounds racist to me.

          Actually Don41331 Vanessa cant be a racist. She is black and therefore is automatically a victim no matter what the circumstances.

          people like you should not be given a license to carry a gun - you need to be under a doctor's care.

          fedupwithfed needs to be taught a life lesson. I wish I could be there to witness it. And I'm white. Tool.

          VanessafromDC, brendan-4, Eric-913730, pzphiml, Don41331, Candlewycke, Lorr-2611132, gofins-4159157, don't make it personal folks.

          Above all else, respect others. Address issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks.

          You are all suspended for a day.

          • 2 votes
          #2.88 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:46 PM EDT

          Why is this still being treated like a White vs. Black issue? Zimmerman's name is misleading and all, but he is Hispanic. We don't bat an eyelash when Hispanics (like myself) and Blacks (like Martin) shoot each other over turf and money, but this case has been blown clear out of proportion by hate-mongers like Sharpton who hide behind the veil of speaking for "their people". Last I checked, we're all American. If you have an allegiance other than that, get the Hell out. Enough said. "He had a a right to be there"...who disputes this? Except perhaps the guidelines of a gated community. Has anyone reviewed their policy on guests and how the area is to be guarded? Of course not.

          Here's another question - if it comes down to credibility, where are the raised eyebrows over the falsified, sworn affidavit signed by Martin's purported girlfriend that indicated he called her and was worried about "some guy" following him? And the total lack of evidence in phone records that such a call took place? The burden of proof remains on the State, entirely. It doesn't bode well to accidentally or intentionally withhold anything from the Court, certainly, but the case on behalf of the "victim" here has far more hurdles to clear to secure a conviction. This is an exercise at grasping at straws to break down the defendant's credibility. However, that credibility becomes largely irrelevant if physical evidence and eyewitnesses (Yes, to the idiot who said no such witnesses exist, they do) exonerates him regardless.

          Keep something in mind about our justice system. It's not what you know. It's what you can prove. People can riot like a bunch of savages when he gets acquitted. I assure you, the country at large will not be surprised to see it happen. After all, it did occur years ago after a group of cops had to beat a black man to subdue him, thanks to his drugged-up state. I suppose King being ordered to surrender after being stopped for DUI and continuing to resist even after getting sprayed and tased equated to the police simply leaving him be? Granted, different scenario in many ways, but in response to the equally imbecilic assertion that "the only people I allow to hold or interrogate me are police", apparently even a genuine badge means little to some in our society.

          Bottom line, our Courts serve justice, not some bully mentality of "give them the verdict they want, or they'll riot", which is largely the message being sent by the so-called leaders of the Black community. Get over it, and deal with whatever decision is reached like adults. To paraphrase something I once heard in the Army, "it's above your paygrade".

          • 2 votes
          #2.89 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:46 PM EDT

          Guys! guys! chill! I'm from the future! you want to know the outcome of the case? Zimmerman goes free, and Trayvon family commits suicide because it was shown that Tryvon was a thug and he assaulted a innocent man for asking questions! Tryvon started it which im from the future so i know the outcome of the trial!

          nah honestly though. Tryvon started it, Zimmerman finished it. I like all the hypocrites here. He should of taken it like a man, get his ass beat! he started to lose so he went for the gun! Tryvon and every other scumbag thug would of done the same thing if they started to lose a fight. Gone for a weapon to make it more fair for them. Want proof? Why is it all the thugs run in gangs and jump people? They have no code of honor. Tryvon was a thug so he has no honor. He started the fight and got what he deserved. All parents believe their children are angels even when proof says otherwise. Parents are in denial about the truth. So parents feelings are irrelevant to this case. Just like all the speculation from the racist that turn this into a white vs black thing. I say all those racist morons should be put in jail for Slander towards Zimmerman.

          • 2 votes
          #2.90 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:17 PM EDT

          starsailing:

          Don't forget the recorded screams of Trayvon....for help...over and over....and over......Zim hand control of him.

          You mean the recordings that experts cannot confirm are from GZ or T. Martin? The ones that Martin's mom were sure were his screams, but his dad was sure they weren't? So the experts who analyzed the recordings, and Martin's parents aren't sure, but YOU are? Sounds credible....

          • 2 votes
          #2.91 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:20 PM EDT

          actually you are all racist...and can't help it, you were born that way.....

          • 3 votes
          #2.92 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:51 PM EDT

          Wiz-3385151 - Based on your logic...anyone can walk up to anyone else and starting questioning them like a cop. Zimmerman was not officially sanctioned to 'police' or even 'neighborhood watch' that area. Based on your logic...if that person doesn't want to answer those questions...feels unsafe being followed by some totally random person toting a gun...then too bad. You know for a fact that you would never have put up with that if you were in Martin's shoes.

          Let's assume that Trayvon Martin did smoke a little weed and get into some trouble as a young teenager...Zimmerman didn't know any of that. All he saw was a stereotype he didn't like in a neighborhood where he had proclaimed himself as the neighborhood watch. He had zero legal right to follow or question Trayvon Martin and Trayvon Martin has no idea who this person is, so he rightfully would have felt threatened. You would have too and you would have fought back if that person even remotely lifted a finger towards you.

          I readily admit I would have fought back. If some random guy walked up to me with a sidearm and started asking me who I was and what I was doing there I would most definitely tell that person to "F%&$ off". And unless you want to live in a police state you would too. So let's assume that Martin threw the first punch and was beating Zimmerman's head into the ground. I don't blame him. Zimmerman found trouble after looking for it and took the complete pussy way out when he was losing the fight. But make no mistake...every single Zimmerman supporter would have beat Zimmerman's ass in that situation.

          • 6 votes
          #2.93 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:27 PM EDT

          Jeanne "Where the story gets stinky is it was reported that Martin was sitting on Zimmermans chest and beating him. How did Zimmerman reach around Martins body to extract his gun from its holster? Therefore he must have had it in his hand already when he confronted Martin or it was Zimmerman who was on top when Martin was shot." jessica-1170252 #2.66

          this has been my since one of geozim's relatives (father or brother...i forgot which) stated that trayvon struck him as geozim was reaching into his coat pocket to access his cell phone (cell phone...yeah, right).

          geozim was likely reaching for his weapon. trayvon's gf states she heard rustling sounds (not the sound of a punch) which may have been trayvon wrestling geozim to the ground. it's reasonable he would have been repeatedly striking to get him to drop the gun.

          this makes it feasible why trayvon would have been yelling for help even though he was the one on top.

          • 2 votes
          #2.94 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:30 PM EDT

          Jail Zimmerman, bet after a week he got a new respect about messing with innocent folks. Yep sure the jail dogs got his name.

          • 2 votes
          #2.95 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:31 PM EDT

          Mr Zimmerman had better be thankful I will not be sitting on his jury. I am white and based on personal experience I would vote to convict based on the simple fact he left his vehicle to confront the teen.

          Several years back My wife and I were driving home. We lived in a gated community and our electronic gate pass allowed us to follow another vehicle in. That vehicle then stopped in such a way that we were trapped between it and the now closed gate. The driver then proceeded to get out and come towards me and confronted us as to why we followed him into the gate. Let me tell you all something, that was a very unnerving encounter. Trust me my fight or flight instincts definitely kicked in. We felt threatened and had I had a permit and gun I would have drawn it on the guy. Under these stand your ground laws I would have been in the right to do what I thought was needed to protect myself and my wife.

          We can play race games all we want, and I think it is sad that it is happening. but the real issue is did Martin feel threatened when Zimmerman followed and approached him? How would you feel if you were in his place? Who was actually defending themselves, Z from M or M from Z. This all wouldnt have happened had Zimmerman waited for the police, but no he had to play vigilante.

          • 4 votes
          #2.96 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:42 PM EDT

          StMiller said:

          5'11 158 lbs vs 5'8 200 lbs would never cause even the dumbest person to think "that is a smaller, weaker opponent".

          According to the police report the prone subject found by the first police officer on the scene was a black male, 6'00", 160 lying face down on the ground prone with his hands under his body.

          The subject standing above him identified himself as Zimmerman, George Michael, white male, DOB 10/3/85, 5'09". no weight given, no drivers license. The gun was recovered from inside the waistband of Zimmerman's pants, which suggests to me that he had time and mental capacity to tuck the gun back in after shooting Martin. And there was only three inches difference in height, although 160 for a 6 foot person is skinny.

          • 4 votes
          #2.97 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:46 PM EDT

          Amanda - That's correct. I was responding to someone earlier that was insinuating that Martin thought that Zimmerman was a small guy that he could easily beat up. But my point is that a three inch difference is nothing and when you add in the body size of the two people it would be even less of an influence. I'm 6' ft 195 and I can't even imagine how skinny 160 would be for someone of my height, but there is no way at that skinny you would be eyeballing someone a few inches shorter and 40 lbs heavier thinking..."I could totally kick his ass".

          • 3 votes
          #2.98 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 9:05 PM EDT

          LOL, and still we have foolish discourse on events that took place based solely on biased news reports and blogs from people who weren't there, but thought they were. I found it interesting that the article said that all the "discovery" issues were still months from completing. Perhaps zimmermans attorney should insist on having a speedy trial rather than a prolonged one where any witnesses could rethink their testimony based on continuing news opinion reporting. If those witnesses were to read these blogs they would surely be changing the account of what they saw until they would really question what they saw.

          Guess that is why juries are told not to listen/read media reports while the trial is in progress.

          • 1 vote
          #2.99 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 9:52 PM EDT

          @StMiller

          Oh im sorry that im not a thug, I had a random guy come up to me and ask what was going on. I did not attack the guy, I answered him. I could of walked away and been a dick, but I didnt turn into a wanna-be thug and attack someone because they came up and spoke to you.

          Sorry that I'm not an aggressive douche bag like you. I have respect for my elders. Tryvon started the fight by attacking, he wasn't threaten. he deserved what he got.

            #2.100 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 10:10 PM EDT

            Wiz-3385151 - Right. We should all do what Wiz says and be completely open to answering questions asked by totally random gun-toting strangers.

            It's a free country Wiz, so no...me not being willing to answer total stranger's questions does not make me disrespectful or a "thug". Plus, who made you the arbiter of what look defines someone as a "thug"? Was it the hoody? Honestly, I wear hoodies quite a lot. I work as a software consultant to many major universities and they often gift me sweatshirts ergo I am a thug to you or still just a douchebag?

            • 7 votes
            #2.101 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 10:36 PM EDT

            @StMiller

            You misunderstood. Try re-reading it. I said I answered him but I had the option of not answering him. but i did not ATTACK HIM. Tryvon didn't see the gun, otherwise he wouldnt of attacked Zimmerman. If he did see it and still attacked Zimmerman, then he committed suicide.

            Tryvon was the thug, He attacked someone for the stupidest reason every(What thugs do). OH NOES! SOMEONE SPOKE TO TRYVON! HOW DARE HE SPEAK TO TRYVON!

            Freedom of speech, Zimmerman has the right to talk to anyone. Just like Tryvon had the right to A) Answer him, or B) ignore him. Tryvon took option C. C) Attack Zimmerman because Tryvon wants to be a thug.

              #2.102 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 10:50 PM EDT

              also, there is no evidence he was looking for trouble

              You can't possibly be that naive. You don't pursue someone with a loaded gun if you are not looking for trouble. Zimmerman created the situation instead of letting the police do their job. There is no stand your ground defense for Zimmerman. Furthermore Zimmerman was on prescription benzos and amphetamines and had a history of violence. The fact that he had a concealed to carry permit at all is beyond disturbing. The prosecution has a slam dunk case and Zimmerman is toast. Add all these lies and mistruths on top of the already damning pile of evidence and it clearly shows Zimmermans lack of integrity, honesty, and basic morals.

              • 4 votes
              #2.103 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 11:46 PM EDT

              Wiz-3385151

              @StMiller

              You misunderstood. Try re-reading it. I said I answered him but I had the option of not answering him. but i did not ATTACK HIM.

              wiz, you don't know who attacked whom, do you? Your speculation shows your total bias.

              he deserved what he got.

              WOW. Your statement about a 17yr old child deserving to get shot breaks my heart for 2 reasons: For the kid because he is dead and for you because you don't have a heart.

              Wiz-3385151

              @StMiller

              Tryvon was the thug, He attacked someone for the stupidest reason every(What thugs do). OH NOES! SOMEONE SPOKE TO TRYVON! HOW DARE HE SPEAK TO TRYVON!

              wow, wow, wow....

              Freedom of speech, Zimmerman has the right to talk to anyone.

              nope, it's called harassment. looked it up. You can stop me BUT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASK YOU TO LEAVE ME ALONE, anything after that is harassment,

              Just like Tryvon had the right to A) Answer him, or B) ignore him. Tryvon took option C. C) Attack Zimmerman because Tryvon wants to be a thug.

              for the 10th time -STOP TALKING LIKE YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. YOU HAVE NO CLUE AND SAYING THAT YOU DO WOULD BE LYING.

              • 3 votes
              #2.104 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 11:50 AM EDT

              my quoting got totally messed up so;

              Wiz-3385151

              Tryvon was the thug, He attacked someone for the stupidest reason every(What thugs do). OH NOES! SOMEONE SPOKE TO TRYVON! HOW DARE HE SPEAK TO TRYVON!

              wow, wow, wow....

              Freedom of speech, Zimmerman has the right to talk to anyone.

              nope, it's called harassment. looked it up. You can stop me BUT I HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASK YOU TO LEAVE ME ALONE, anything after that is harassment,

              Just like Tryvon had the right to A) Answer him, or B) ignore him. Tryvon took option C. C) Attack Zimmerman because Tryvon wants to be a thug.

              for the 10th time -STOP TALKING LIKE YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. YOU HAVE NO CLUE AND SAYING THAT YOU DO WOULD BE LYING.

              • 4 votes
              #2.105 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 12:00 PM EDT

              @bayllie

              Oh the irony. You say I dont know exactly what happened? lets look at the facts.

              Zimmerman had 2 black eyes, a broken nose, and a wound on the back of his head.
              Witness say they saw Tryvon on top of Zimmerman, unable to tell who was screaming for help.
              Tryvon was shot in the chest.

              Look up Assault. If Zimmerman would of been the one that attacked Tryvon then Tryvon would of had bruising, which he did not.

              You say I have no heart? I don't care much for people that attack other people, all evidence swings towards Zimmerman side.

              You call me biased? What about you? you say Zimmerman did more then just talk to the kid which caused the kid to attack him. You do have the right to ask me to leave you alone, but you have no proof that Tryvon did that. we only have proof that the thug attacked Zimmerman. and you can either accept that, or remain in denial that no matter what you don't have the right to defend yourself. Which evidence proves that what Zimmerman did.

              If you have proof that it was Zimmerman that threw the first punch then please provide the facts with credible sources and I'd be glad to look at them.

                #2.106 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 3:20 PM EDT

                Wiz-3385151 - If you want to say that @bayllie and I are making assumptions about the episode I would point out that you are making all of all the same assumptions about Zimmerman. You don't know if Zimmerman or Trayvon hit first. Trayvon being seen on top of Zimmerman is not an indication of who started it. At most it is an indication that Trayvon was getting the better of the fight. Also, the witness accounts have already been shown to be weak as some have already changed their story.

                Again...if you read the transcript of the girlfriend's account of the phonecall, Trayvon was feeling threatened by being followed. All of us would be scared in that situation and if then someone walked up and we felt they were a threat we would all potentially end up in a fight. Consider that the Florida "Stand your Ground" law actually protected Trayvon in that situation and he would have been legally in the right to defend himself against Zimmerman. If he felt in danger by some unknown person following him for no reason that he could surmise as he told his girlfriend then he could defend himself. If that qualifies him as a thug in your mind then I know I'm a thug too. According to that law:

                Fla. Stat. § 776.012. Use of force in defense of person

                A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:

                (1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony;

                • 4 votes
                #2.107 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 11:28 PM EDT

                Again...if you read the transcript of the girlfriend's account of the phonecall,

                There is a problem with that in it's her account. We have no way to prove or disprove it. If this case makes it as far as a courtroom, she had better make sure that it is hasn't been embellished in anyway, or the prosecutor will lose a major point of their case. Not saying she's making it up or has left out any details, but with all the falsehoods used as "proof" during the first few days, I have the right to have doubts about her testimony.

                Consider that the Florida "Stand your Ground" law actually protected Trayvon in that situation and he would have been legally in the right to defend himself against Zimmerman.

                As I've said many times in this section, both parties were legal up to the time when the first punch was thrown. SYG takes effect at that point, and it's up to the prosecutor to prove that Zimmerman threw the first punch. So if Zimmerman's account is that he was attacked were true, then SGY falls on Zimmerman and not Martin. If Zimmerman threw the first punch, then SYG doesn't apply.

                • 1 vote
                #2.108 - Sun Jun 3, 2012 3:44 AM EDT

                wiz, change your name. you make abetter defence witness on the ignorance of bigots than can pulled from a crowd.

                • 1 vote
                #2.109 - Sun Jun 3, 2012 9:14 PM EDT
                Reply

                This guy is a major douche! I can't believe people defend him so much. He is a loser! The only reason people defend him is because Trayvon was black which to most people means he is a criminal even though he has no record. I would feel the same if Z was black and Trayvon was white this man needs to go to jail!

                • 63 votes
                #3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:32 PM EDT
                Comment author avatarJeff-2879620Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                If "Z" was black this wouldn't be in the media. And Trayvon was 17 so if he had a criminal past, we wouldn't know because he's a minor, and those records are sealed.

                • 27 votes
                #3.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:40 PM EDT
                Comment author avatarEric-913730Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                Racism is still around and abundant. Look at the posts here and you'll find it all over the place.

                Zimmerman didn't have to follow Martin.

                • 41 votes
                #3.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:00 PM EDT

                Zimmerman didn't have to follow Martin.

                Were you there? You actually saw it with your own eyes?

                Isn't that for a judge and jury to decide?

                • 16 votes
                #3.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:04 PM EDT

                Eric, since when is following someone due to suspicion considered racist? If thats the case, then just about every single cop that has ever observed anyone for anything is considered racist.

                Racism is surely around and abundant, and until we have the equivalent of the NAACP for white people, blacks are inherently racist.

                • 17 votes
                #3.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:08 PM EDT

                Zimmerman didn't have to follow Martin.

                Were you there? You actually saw it with your own eyes?

                He admitted to the dispatcher that he was following Martin.

                • 16 votes
                #3.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:14 PM EDT

                Oh so Zimmerman is a cop now? If he would have listened to the cops none of this would have happened.

                • 18 votes
                #3.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:16 PM EDT

                He admitted to the dispatcher that he was following Martin.

                But you don't know in what context because you weren't there.

                Again, who made you judge & jury?

                • 6 votes
                #3.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:17 PM EDT

                Don, its on the police tape. they said we do not need you to follow him, he said ok, but did anyway-thats not even disputed. This didnt have to happen if Zimmerman would have just reported the guy and let it be. Don't even know hwy he had to report the kid actually. He looked suspicious (to Zimmerman) but he did nothing wrong and was where he was entitled to be. Trayvon didn't have the gun.Trayvon had the right to defend himself too, with some whack job following him and obviously confronting him for no reason.Too bad the kid didnt have the gun. Yet again, if he did, he would be locked up with no chance of stand your ground BS.

                • 18 votes
                #3.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:19 PM EDT

                no we are going by the actual EVIDENCE.. phone recordings of 911 operators telling this @!$%# to NOT FOLLOW???

                • 11 votes
                #3.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:19 PM EDT

                I second that Gotyouallfooled.. he is a douche...smh!!!..and its sad...here we are in 2012 and it continues...at the end of the day we all want the same things!!!...we can all agree to disagree..can we please just leave out the racial overtones??????

                • 10 votes
                #3.10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:20 PM EDT

                If Zimmerman were black or white and this kid was white you would not have heard about this because he would have been arrested and convicted easily.......You can get away with killing black youths all of the time...Like someone stated above about 55 shootings in Chicago last weekend....They don't get investigated or prosecuted the same way....The only way there is a prosecution is if the shooter is black and is caught at the scene or there is a eyewitness, otherwise it is swept under the rug like they tried to do with this...

                • 9 votes
                #3.11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:20 PM EDT
                Comment author avatarFRANCIS-1228935Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                The real reason that most white people defend Zimmerman is because of the reverse racism that exists in this country. "Reverse racism" is a funny term because racism is just plain old racism. Black people want to loot, riot, rape, kill etc etc etc every time a black person is the VICTIM. I wish the "left-liberal" media that controls the majority of the news outlets in this country would stop enticing minorities with false information. The more black folks react to the media, the more BS they'll feed them for their own agendas. Honestly, white people couldn't care less about George Zimmerman, especially since he looks HISPANIC(not white). THE MEDIA NEEDS TO START REPORTING ALL OF THE BLACK ON WHITE CRIME IN AMERICA. You know why they won't??? My guess is that they're afraid white people will arm themselves to the teeth and LEGALLY shoot to kill when threatened by black folks. TRUST ME YOU DON'T WANT THAT especially since the police will look the other way. Have a good day ; )

                • 3 votes
                #3.12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:20 PM EDT

                I'd just like to ask all the whites out there claiming reverse discrimination from blacks: Would you be willing to turn black yourself right now? I mean after all if you're so victimized by black racists--then would you be willing to turn black yourself so you're no longer the "white victim?"

                Dare ya!

                • 15 votes
                #3.13 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:23 PM EDT

                GotYouAllFooled you know damned well if that if GZ was black and TM was white we would never even have heard about this case. There definitely would not have been any arrests made. Happens all the time. Look it up.

                Have a good day :)

                • 1 vote
                #3.14 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:23 PM EDT

                Look the Zimmster isn't stupid. He offered up his passport and the prosecutor already bitched about his lack of acuracy in his financial disclosures right after he was able to make bail with his donation moneys. All this is going to do is stimulate another huge round of donations from his supporters. He made over a quarter million in the six days leading up to his arrest, so far it's estimated hes at least doubled that in donations since. He's going to go get paid about $15,000 - $20,000 or more a day for sitting in jail. Why not? He's not going be convicted. You can tell it by the way Corey's isn't smiling anymore because everyone knows she overcharged and doesn't have the evidence to convict Zimm. Go George!

                • 1 vote
                #3.15 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:25 PM EDT

                Well...none of us was there! Obviously...but there were some witnesses, whom I may add, called the police ON "Z". The fact that the only thing consistent in this case AT THIS POINT is "Z's" CONSISTENT lies is just plain sad. Do you want to try to blame that on Martin too? The only other fact you considered to NOT CONSIDER was the audio tape of the POLICE DEPARTMENT/DISPATCHER telling "Z" NOT to follow Martin. Another thing is that you jump on the poster above us for "Zimmerman didn't have to follow Martin", did you not see the two sentences above? Racisim is everywhere...if not, tell me since you are inclined about "Z's" cognitive processes, what provoked him to follow Martin?

                • 11 votes
                #3.16 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:28 PM EDT

                gofins, the dispatcher will also tell you not to follow a kidnapper, even though you witnessed the event. they will tell you that for your own safety, because if they tell you to follow, and you get hurt or someone gets hurt, its on their backs.

                if you saw someone kidnap a little kid, and you were following while on the phone with police, and they ask you to not follow, would you stop ?

                I sure as hell would not stop following, and that is a very comparable scenario to this one. You, I, nor anyone else on this forum can speculate as to if Zimmerman should have been following or not.

                • 2 votes
                #3.17 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:34 PM EDT

                You can be a douche , a used rag, or what ever. If you are attacked you still have the right to defend your pathetic self.

                It was said if TM did not come back to kick the hell out of Z he would not have been shot. TM was in the wrong

                That is why we defend Z as we put ourselves in Z shoes and ask what we would do? We all defend ourselves or end up like Poppo with no face

                • 2 votes
                #3.18 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:39 PM EDT

                Let the jury decide. Since the black crime rate was up in that area, it is understandable that he was concerned. You can't ignore statistics, and if you do, you are a moron. I'm am really tired of the race card. It goes both ways. There is reverse prejudice in the workplace. How many jobs go to minorities, even though there is a metter qualified candidate??? It happens everyday and I have seen it many times. Get over the race issue....life is unfair all the way around.

                • 1 vote
                #3.19 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:39 PM EDT

                no we are going by the actual EVIDENCE.. phone recordings of 911 operators telling this @!$%# to NOT FOLLOW???

                No, it's not actual EVIDENCE until it's been submitted during a trial. Get it straight.

                  #3.20 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:41 PM EDT

                  Fire blade----You think being a hero and following and possibly stopping someone from kidnapping a child is comparable to shooting an un-armed kid? You have strange morals...I would think stopping Zimmerman from shooting an innocent kid would be more comparable to stopping the kidnapping and shooting an unarmed kid even if he was committing burglary is a deplorable sin....I guess I was raised different than you...Who was raised correctly in the ultimate judge's eyes me or you ?

                  • 6 votes
                  #3.21 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:45 PM EDT

                  Don I am sure the 911 tape has been submitted since the evidence has been submitted.....Are you following this story as reported or just following twitter and not very informed tweets?

                  • 5 votes
                  #3.22 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:49 PM EDT

                  The facts are they were both in the right. Trayvon belonged where he was an felt threatened himself. Zimmerman felt his neighborhood was threatened. Trayvon had every right Zimmerman did to stand his ground. I'm all for citizens arming themselves and defending their own, but if you call the cops, and they tell you to stay put, then stay put. Zimmerman was not in any danger until he went against police orders and got out of his car. Trayvon is afforded the same stand your ground right as any other and now he is dead for it. Zimmerman needs to face charges for the simple fact he didn't listen to police orders.

                  • 9 votes
                  #3.23 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:49 PM EDT

                  Don I am sure the 911 tape has been submitted since the evidence has been submitted.....Are you following this story as reported or just following twitter and not very informed tweets?

                  There hasn't been a trial, sw philly. Are you a lawyer or do you just follow the local lynch mob?

                  • 2 votes
                  #3.24 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:26 PM EDT

                  Don41331-------------They haven't had discovery yet ? I thought they did since they are releasing evidence? What about all of those tapes and documents that were released under the FL sunshine law? I am pretty sure court proceedings have taken place as in the trial has started....Blacks were lynched nobody else maybe you should research the name Lynch and learn something......So you really think there has been no evidence submitted yet ?

                  The trial is not over but evidence has been submitted on record no matter what you think....I am right and you are wrong......This is not opinion but fact......

                  • 1 vote
                  #3.25 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:08 PM EDT

                  stand your ground does not give you the right to attack

                  Kind of like a gunfight in the old west both standing their ground till some one goes for his gun or walks away or gets carried away. Some only understand the law of a point of a gun

                    #3.26 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 8:42 PM EDT
                    Reply

                    I estimate this thread will accumulate.. 400 comments. Rough guess

                    • 9 votes
                    #4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:34 PM EDT

                    uh-oh, they just revoked his bail, it's gonna be a lot more than 400.. more like 4000

                    • 28 votes
                    #4.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:49 PM EDT

                    It's a very polarizing story. I'll guess at about the 700 mark.

                    • 4 votes
                    #4.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:01 PM EDT

                    And all playing the racist card. I say let the judge and jury decide. We don't have all the facts.

                    • 30 votes
                    #4.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:13 PM EDT

                    I imagine the word "racist" will bat over a 1000.

                    • 13 votes
                    #4.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:15 PM EDT
                    Comment author avatarWHAT?-4099780Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                    I'd just like to ask all the whites out there claiming reverse discrimination from blacks: Would you be willing to turn black yourself right now? I mean after all if you're so victimized by black racists--then would you be willing to turn black yourself so you're no longer the "white victim?"

                    Dare ya!

                    • 37 votes
                    #4.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:26 PM EDT
                    Comment author avatarJessica-1170252Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                    well duh, all white people KNOW that zimmerman is innocent and martin is guilty.

                    but we prefer to let mostly white judges and jury's make it official.

                    • 12 votes
                    #4.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:51 PM EDT

                    Would you be willing to turn black yourself right now?

                    So how should I do that? Shoe polish?

                    :p

                    lol...

                    • 14 votes
                    #4.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:52 PM EDT

                    Give it a rest.

                    • 8 votes
                    #4.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:53 PM EDT

                    No way, proud to be white.

                    No matter how many have tried to attack me over the years I've always come out on top. They've never been able to hurt me.

                    Would not change to save my life.

                    • 10 votes
                    #4.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:54 PM EDT

                    anyone of any color should be proud enough of the race they are to not change. let me ask you this, if every white person turned black overnight and blacks became white would things be better...... of course not, the problem has never been about the color of skin or the race of the person, it has always been about what each individual person does and how they act. there was a time in america when being asian was the same as being black. seems like the asians are doing pretty damn good even with the white man holding them back

                    • 24 votes
                    #4.10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:57 PM EDT

                    This is probably one of the most bulls!@# remarks I've ever seen on a news board.

                    I wholeheartedly agree that Zimmerman should face some jail for this. If I were Trayvon, I would have reacted the same way to some big guy chasing me. Unfortunately the moron (Zimmerman) had a gun. If Zimmerman had injuries he was told not to pursue but he did it anyway and the consequences were as such.

                    Zimmerman, was a hispanic. Not white.

                    Now to your comment about "reverse discrimination". I think your remarks are the most racist I've ever heard of.

                    Sometimes, I wish I could time travel back to the 1700's when they decided to do something SO STUPID as to own slaves because I would smack the idiot in the head and say...you have NO idea how much we're going to pay for this HUNDREDS of years after your stupid idea is ruled unconstitutional and is abolished and not just for those who owned them, but those of us whose ancestors didn't even LIVE in this country at the time of slavery.

                    Give me a damn break!

                    • 35 votes
                    #4.11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:00 PM EDT

                    To What

                    Well What would you want to be White right now? Guess what I have pride in my heritage, I'm sorry for you if you do not. To effing bad if you feel slighted, as we all know that a black person can't get a fair shake anywhere, or get an education or get a good job. We all know that they can only get minimum wage jobs or less. B.S.

                    Give me a break with the why me(us) crap. My people were killed by the millions by the Germans and then were given to Russia after the WWII. People still crack jokes about us all the time but do you here us crying....in case you can't guess I am Polish, well atleast half anyway.

                    I would also guess you would hold some grudge against me as on side of my family has lived in this land before the US was even a country. That side of the family had been deeded land from the King Of England. They also shed blood and gave their lives in the Revolution, Civil war and about every major war since.

                    But I know just because I don't want to be black then I must be some kind of racist. People like you make me sick

                    • 17 votes
                    #4.12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:00 PM EDT

                    I estimate this thread will accumulate.. 400 comments. Rough guess

                    It does not matter what we said here. The judge has revoked his bond, and he needs to be responsible for his actions.

                    People need to think twice before becoming "vigilantes" in that way, especially when 911 had told him not to use violence against the other person. Watching for your neighbors does not mean that you need to kill anybody that may "look"suspicious. That is against the law, it does not matter what State you live in.

                    • 16 votes
                    #4.13 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:02 PM EDT

                    @WHAT?-4099780

                    Good one. I bet not 1 Caucasoid takes you up on that...... Naa don't want that stigma hangin' around their neck (insert "strange fruit" jokes here...)

                    @Don41331 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melasma

                    Just take a bunch of estrogen and progesterone, leave the sorry a$$ shoe polish jokes back in the racist "shoebox". Hey!! Maybe that will help you understand the women's struggle as well!!

                    • 5 votes
                    #4.14 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:03 PM EDT
                    John Keela Gracie Gillvia FacebookDeleted

                    Georgie thinks he is smarter than and above the law.

                    Georgie is goin down.

                    • 25 votes
                    #4.16 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:12 PM EDT

                    Why would I want to be a different race? I don't feel victimized by blacks or any other race. It's more the media and the liberal politicians I feel victimized by.

                    • 11 votes
                    #4.17 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:13 PM EDT

                    Never understood the yahoos like John Keela Gracie Gill and others like that... ALL humans have a fight or flight response and it's something NOONE can do anything about. I guess some don't think TM was human......

                    The kid was scared, he decided to fight back against someone looking to harm him......

                    Unfortunately, the SYG law will allow Zimmerman to get away with stimulating that fight or flight response and killing the person he agitated.... Here's where big Gov't regulation needs to step down..,..

                    • 6 votes
                    #4.18 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:16 PM EDT

                    @ John Keela Gracie Gill...it's people like you that make this country terrible. you should never wish death on anyone. don't you know that stuff comes back on you threefold. And you have kids???? Oh my gosh. I feel really sorry that you carry so much hatred in your heart.

                    • 10 votes
                    #4.19 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:17 PM EDT

                    Just take a bunch of estrogen and progesterone, leave the sorry a$$ shoe polish jokes back in the racist "shoebox". Hey!! Maybe that will help you understand the women's struggle as well!!

                    Hey, do I get free titties?

                    lol...

                    • 3 votes
                    #4.20 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:20 PM EDT

                    I am a bit confused. What does this article have to do with Trayvon other than it is George Zimmerman, there is no race issue here. The guy tried pull a fast one on a court by hiding finances in order to get a manageable bail, and concealing a passport. Who ever was in the wrong on the crime as a whole will be determined rightly by law. We are all people I am no better than an african-american, or latino-american.

                    • 18 votes
                    #4.21 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:24 PM EDT

                    john Keela, i'm a bit surprised at your comments. Especially since those kids in your pic look part black. Little gangsta wannabe's huh?

                    • 3 votes
                    #4.22 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:26 PM EDT

                    Defense attorney Jose Baez for this high profile case.

                      #4.23 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:30 PM EDT

                      well duh, all white people KNOW that zimmerman is innocent and martin is guilty.

                      but we prefer to let mostly white judges and jury's make it official.

                      jessica-1170252 #4.6

                      whether or not this is sarcasm it's probably the truth (except the all white people know he's geozim's innocent line).

                      the judge seems to be going as light on geozim as he possibly can. he tossed out a weak excuse as to why he's ignoring geozim's not turning in both passports. he's giving geozim time to make up a story concerning why he didn't tell his lawyer about the 200k he had raised on the internet.

                      the prosecution even seemed put out with the question as to whether shelly zim will be prosecuted for prejury. why would she not at least be fined?

                      • 4 votes
                      #4.24 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:32 PM EDT

                      Why would anyone be proud of their color? It has nothing to do with who you are. Its just skin. Being proud of your color makes you a racist.

                      • 3 votes
                      #4.25 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:33 PM EDT

                      I'd just like to ask all the whites out there claiming reverse discrimination from blacks: Would you be willing to turn black yourself right now? I mean after all if you're so victimized by black racists--then would you be willing to turn black yourself so you're no longer the "white victim?"

                      If I could, I would do it in a second! I can just imagine never being called racist no matter what I said, getting jobs and promotions to help companies look like they care about diversity, let those guilty white folks feel good about themselves, and now they get to tell everyone about their black friend. You're automatically cool just because you're black, and best of all I would probably do a lot better with the ladies. Sure I might get pulled over a little more often, but I would just donate $100 to the police department fund and get that silly sticker they give you and put it in my window, that should even things up.

                      • 5 votes
                      #4.26 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:35 PM EDT

                      Most whites COULD NOT handle being Black, not even for ONE DAY!! Look at how they cried about Affirmative Action. Which was instituted by law to give people of color, and white women an opportunity in the workforce. Most white men do not have the courage, or the character to face hundreds of years of slavery, racial hatred, segregation, discrimination, oppression, jim crow, church burnings, beatings, lynchings, bombings, injustice, all because of the color of your skin! No, they could not endure!! But, Black folks HAVE!!

                      • 16 votes
                      #4.27 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:35 PM EDT

                      Glad to see all the Republicans here are supporting BREAKING THE LAW AND LYING UNDER OATH TO A JUDGE.

                      I was not aware that Republicans are allowed to break the law and lie, under oath, to a judge. Must be nice.

                      • 12 votes
                      #4.28 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:40 PM EDT

                      stupid is as stupid says, bored. ignorance makes you racist.

                      • 4 votes
                      #4.29 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:41 PM EDT

                      Jessica only if you trade lives with me. Then you can live in the hell I did and still do. I'll take your life. I probably wouldn't have 42 years of medical hell caused by taking birth control pills. So want to trade? But you will trade being called the "n" word for Polack and cracker and redneck by people just like you.

                      • 2 votes
                      #4.30 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:42 PM EDT
                      Comment author avatarAdrian Hallvia Facebook

                      Heres my problem with the case. the prosecutor doesn't want this case tried in the media and on the internet. This case wouldn't be going to trial with out them. At the time of the killing the police investigated and took witness statements. It was deamed a case of self defence and under Florida law he was justified in the shooting, no arrests was made. After the media got a hold of the story, all the public out cry from the black community, then they decide to hire a "Special" prosecutor to get justice. I call complete BullSHlT. I carry a weapon and pray I never need to use it. If someone is on top of me beating my ass and I feared for my life I would shoot them in a heartbeat, regardless of race, sex, age, sexual orientation or hare color. This case is being turned into something its not and Zimmerman is paying the price weather found guilty or innocent. His life will never be the same.

                      • 6 votes
                      #4.31 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:43 PM EDT

                      LogicRequired

                      If I could, I would do it in a second! ... getting jobs and promotions to help companies look like they care about diversity

                      Hate to break it to you... but you know all those black guys that got promoted over you? It was not because of the color of your skin, it was because you failed. You were not good enough, and they were better than you... so they got the promotion.

                      The skin color excuse is just a pathetic attempt to save your self esteem from the obvious truth that you are unwilling to accept.

                      • 11 votes
                      #4.32 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:44 PM EDT

                      Color has nothing to do with the facts. Zimmerman had a gun, he confronted an unarmed Martin after being told not to by the authorities. During that confrontation Zimmerman used his gun to shoot and kill Martin..... What is the big mystery here, sure sounds like 2nd degree murder to me.

                      • 15 votes
                      #4.33 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:46 PM EDT

                      Don41331 had this to say in response to the question "Would you be willing to turn black yourself right now?":

                      So how should I do that? Shoe polish?

                      :p

                      lol...

                      No, it is done with a combination of skin dye, contact lenses, and treatment of one's hair. People have done it. One sociologist did it and lived as a black man who was impoverished for a lengthy period of time--he was shocked to find that not only were the stories of black people being treated badly in pretty much every situation true, but that things were even worse than he'd been led to believe.

                      Similarly, there was a television show which took a white family and turned them "black" and a black family and turned them "white," and then recorded what happened. I'm sure a lot of it was staged, but the two families found out that there really is such a thing as "white privilege" which people take for granted and that there is no rampant effort to make life really easy on the black people (who get "everything" from the government).

                      One example was that the girl, who had been turned "black," walked into a store and asked to fill out a form for employment. The girl at the register opened the drawer, pretended to look, and said that they were all out of applications. She then laughed, after the "black" girl had left, and made a crack about how their customers would flee if they hired a black girl. This was in the 1990s, I think.

                      Yes, if all the European Americans who think that black people have it easy in the workplace and so forth actually believed that, you probably would see some desperate people dying their skin and putting in contact lenses to get part of that "preferential treatment." But, you don't see that. You do see European Americans pretending to be Native Americans to get set-aside scholarships (about the only set-aside scholarships in the US any more are for Native Americans, as some exist because of treaty obligations)--but you very rarely, if ever, see anyone pretending to be black. Even lower-income European American people do not do this to get these theoretical "preferential treatments"--though they would be the ones most in need.

                      This really is a key point. If there is preferential treatment to be had in employment and preferential treatment to be had from the government--why wouldn't there be people doing it. It's fairly easily done.

                      • 8 votes
                      #4.34 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:49 PM EDT

                      it's not nice to fool a judge...it's the best thing that could have happened..he's going to be tough on the defense here on out. they'll try and have him replaced now, hope it doesn't happen.

                      • 5 votes
                      #4.35 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:50 PM EDT

                      What else has he lied about? Maybe self defence? He turned in an expired passport while keeping another that expires in 2014.... And then to be lying about money, well I hope the judge takes all of this in to consideration before setting bail again...

                      Zimmerman seems to be a lier as well as his wife...

                      • 9 votes
                      #4.36 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:58 PM EDT

                      Adrian, The question then begs to be asked. Would you have followed Trayvon after being advised not to do so by the police? If you would have chosen to not follow, I buy your logic. If you chose to follow, you become the instigator and lose all right to the claim of self defense.

                      • 7 votes
                      #4.37 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:59 PM EDT

                      Most white men do not have the courage, or the character to face hundreds of years of slavery,

                      Exactly how many years were you a slave?

                      • 5 votes
                      #4.38 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:00 PM EDT

                      but the media consortium says that's not a good enough reason to keep what is usually a public record from being released.

                      Translation: We don't give a sh*t if they get harassed, as long as we get our scoop.

                      • 5 votes
                      #4.39 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:01 PM EDT

                      Sounds just like Florida--why won't those people do any-frigging-thing on the up & up? What a bunch of conniving a$$holes. Put 'em all in jail, turn on the gas, and leave it to God to sort it out.

                        #4.40 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:03 PM EDT

                        BigAl Las Vegas said it right.

                        • 4 votes
                        #4.41 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:06 PM EDT

                        Doesn't this say it all about our Lame Stream Media:

                        "Prosecutors and Zimmerman's attorney fear witnesses will be harassed if their names are publicized, but the media consortium says that's not a good enough reason to keep what is usually a public record from being released."

                        Screw the witnesses and anybody else that helps to see that justice is served.

                        This is exactly what Obama and his administration did to the Pakistani Doctor that helped the U.S.A. locate and zero-in on the location of Osama Bin Laden. He helps us bring the No.1 terrorist in the World to justice and for that he gets his name sold out by the very Administration he was helping. Another victim hits the rear wheels of the Obama Bus.

                        • 4 votes
                        #4.42 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:11 PM EDT

                        Why am I not surprised he got caught lying again. Said and had his wife and say they had NO MONEY and had over $100.000 in a credit union. What a dumb #$%% talking on Jail house phones. And not thinking it would get recorded. Dam its on the wall you know the Sign saying calls are monitored.

                        Lets see if he runs or turns himself in. He may have already ran. And he also lied and turned in only one passport. He had two. Supposed to turn them all in. Now the D.A. gets to call him an outright liar to the court and his whole testimony is SUSPECT.

                        • 6 votes
                        #4.43 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:15 PM EDT

                        this has nothing to do with race, or obama. this is a simple heariing about a guy who lied to the court. he mislead the court into thinking he was broke when in fact he is setting on 100's of thousands of dollars. simple, nothing to do with race folks

                        • 8 votes
                        #4.44 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:18 PM EDT

                        Yup and he should be charged with perjury. As well.

                        • 6 votes
                        #4.45 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:20 PM EDT

                        Now, about the NewsViner's concerns for attaining a darker skin color for the presumed thug Zimmerman... seems to me that Crispy BaconFace Lady Patricia Krentcil could milk some of her notoriety by becoming a "skin color modification consultant" for George Zimmerman while she's still in the public eye.

                        WOW. George Z is in a real pickle now. Would not want to be him.

                        • 1 vote
                        #4.46 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:21 PM EDT

                        indieparty- umm the person before you had a point. Don't you understand what affirmative
                        action is? I live in Philadelphia, and let me let you, I know firsthand
                        soooooooo many black people, or any other race, get jobs over whites who
                        shouldn’t. Many people who get these jobs are not as qualified, not to mention
                        have a bad attitude, yet they still manage to get the jobs. Companies do it because
                        they have to “make it fair.” I am friends with all races; I just can’t stand
                        ghetto people in general. I don’t care what color they are, but people who have
                        that ghetto, lazy attitude really annoy me. It’s because they aren’t raised
                        properly. I can’t stand white trash either. So people need to get over the
                        color thing and focus more on the ghetto thing. You can be ghetto and trash and
                        be any color. We need to start raising our kids better so this world doesn’t
                        become overrun by trash. As far as this case, all I have to say is if a 6ft 3
                        dude, of any color, started attacking me and I had a gun, I would shoot too.
                        Why would anyone risk being beaten to death? You never know.

                        • 2 votes
                        #4.47 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:28 PM EDT

                        You know, I grew up mixed race and treated differenly. Hated it until I grew to appreciate my "exotic" look. I really would often want to walk in the shoes of a Black person. I realized that if I was discriminated against just for looking different and really didn't look THAT different can only imagine what Black people go through. White people have no idea at all. Clueless. And, btw, just because you are white does NOT make you superior to anyone. Just means your ancestors came from a diiferent part of the world.

                        • 5 votes
                        #4.48 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:28 PM EDT

                        IndieParty -

                        Hate to break it to you... but you know all those black guys that got promoted over you? It was not because of the color of your skin, it was because you failed. You were not good enough, and they were better than you... so they got the promotion.

                        The skin color excuse is just a pathetic attempt to save your self esteem from the obvious truth that you are unwilling to accept.

                        So does that mean that if black people do not get promoted that is just because they have failed also, and it is not racism like you always see claimed?

                        • 3 votes
                        #4.49 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:29 PM EDT

                        Continue to think anyone comming up to you is an agressor will justify your rationality to do what's been done. Believe(se' la vie) is a rudimentary oxymoron.

                        • 1 vote
                        #4.50 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:39 PM EDT

                        what differance does any of this make ... in the end Zimmerman will go free.. thats a fact

                        • 1 vote
                        #4.51 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:41 PM EDT

                        If I could it would be done in a heartbeat. No longer would
                        I fear or ever suffer harassment again from the racist card being thrown at me
                        for treating people equally!

                        I could call white people all kinds of names including racial
                        slurs in a crowded public room where I am the only black guy in it with zero
                        fear of any consequences and laugh about it!

                        I would be labeled a “Boot licking uncle Tom” because I DON’T
                        think a white person deserves to at least have his/her a** kicked for throwing
                        out a racial slur at a black person. There by the grace of GOD go I, applies
                        without meaning to people of this mindset and yet we both know white people
                        agree with this mindset.

                        I know it depends on exactly where you are at. But my claim
                        has been proven with taped and aired examples for decades now! Everyone is a victim
                        of something so everyone should pay a victim tax so that every victim gets
                        paid. No one is exempt from sin!

                        This is why the law use too limit victim status at physical
                        and/or financial harm. Now you can be physically and/or financially harmed for
                        what you say!

                        There is no way for this atmosphere to be NOT selective! It must
                        be selective, opinionated and strips everyone’s right to have their own moral
                        system therefore surrender their children!

                        I a six foot 200 pound male, I know I take my chances going
                        through a 120 pound woman confronting me as I walk home. The best course of
                        action is to turn away and contact authorities. Both men could have avoided
                        this outcome.

                        But it is done so we need to decipher the cause of their
                        meeting. I know why the shooter was there. Does anyone know why the victim was
                        there? To say it does not matter is drawing a conclusion, verdict! And granting
                        home invaders protection! People can be beaten to death and it sounds like most
                        witness’s testimonies are inadmissible. The fact that they changed them only
                        proves them un-reliable.

                        Leaving us with only the reason for the meeting. Come in to
                        my yard and I do not know you and you give no clear reason for being there I
                        will try to remove you myself before calling authorities! Statistics do not
                        back up the claim that denying people the use of deadly force as “progress”.

                        “Last resort” is risking the life of you and yours! Refusal
                        to except this is protecting home invaders!

                        • 2 votes
                        #4.52 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:42 PM EDT

                        Since they revoked the bail I think its going 2 be more than 4,000 its going 2 be more like 6,000 or even more than that.

                        • 1 vote
                        #4.53 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:44 PM EDT

                        Big Al Las Vegas -

                        Name one thing that Zimmerman was doing that was illegal leading up to the altercation. Anything? You may claim shooting Martin was illegal, but what before that was he doing that was illegal? And at the point of shooting Martin, it appears that Martin was in the process of pounding Zimmerman in the face. So shooting him could be self defense very easily.

                        People claim that it was OK for Martin to attack Zimmerman because Zimmerman was following him and he thought he wanted to do him harm and he was afraid. Well, Martin was mistaken. Zimmerman did not want to do any harm. He only did it after being attacked mistakenly by Martin.

                        If you want to say that Martin was justified in attacking Zimmerman, because he thought he presented a danger, and being shot proves that, he was a danger you could do the reverse.

                        Zimmerman was suspicious of Martin. So he followed him. And sure enough he was right because Martin attempted to mug him. So Zimmerman was correct in being suspicious.

                        See it works both ways.

                        I still maintain that they were both mistaken. Martin was not up to anything, and Zimmerman posed no threat to Martin. But because Martin attacked Zimmerman mistakenly, it resulted in his death.

                        • 3 votes
                        #4.54 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:46 PM EDT

                        No, that means that some of the same crap that Blacks had to endure 50 years ago, persists in ppl who want to keep the same azzinine false opinions and beliefs. Ya know, like the geezer Trump!

                        • 2 votes
                        #4.55 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:49 PM EDT

                        Martin was not on Zimmermans land, Martin had done absolutely nothing wrong to be followed in the first place and had this been properly investigated in the first place, we wouldn't have a polarized nation on this issue.

                        This was never about race, this was about Zimmerman with a temper and having a judge for a father who repeatedly bailed him out of his troubles. This time he wasn't able to get his son off for it.

                        I say wait until all the evidence is out and the jury decides, neither side is correct in assuming guilt or innocence. However lying about his finances was a huge mistake and I don't blame the judge for revoking the bail, his lawyer should have known better. Its not like the information that he had that website wasn't out there.

                        • 1 vote
                        #4.56 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:50 PM EDT

                        If Ronald McDonald was following you around MickeyD's in his crazy whacked-out makeup face and followed you out the door and down the street into your 'hood, would you have the fearful urge turn around and face him and murder Ronald McDonald with gunshots? When you stare into his loving happy meal face, do you see a sweet and kind Ronald McDonald, or do you see a menacing Insane Clown Posse ?

                        What if Ronald McDonald was one of us... just a slob like one of us... Just a stranger on the bus, trying to make his way home...

                        I believe a large segment of the 'merkin population has gone angry insane from all the indoctrination of behavior modification they take in from The Media -- TV, movies, talk radio, music lyrics, people practicing stupid behaviors on each other because they saw something on a Reality TV show. NO WONDER people from other countries don't have much respect for 'merka anymore... just sayin'...

                        • 1 vote
                        #4.57 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:24 PM EDT

                        John Keela Gracie Gill banned, new user making racist remarks.

                        Failed audition.

                        • 8 votes
                        #4.58 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:54 PM EDT

                        @fishman-1985527 "as we all know that a black person can't get a fair shake anywhere, or get an education or get a good job. We all know that they can only get minimum wage jobs or less. B.S."
                        Bull @!$%#. Your race card is denied.

                          #4.59 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 10:25 PM EDT

                          Sally:

                          Damn right; racist remarks. Fight for juustice Sally. Can I have your job? I will really get rid of that woman abusing scum Trust Verify. How many times must women report him? Why is he off your radar?

                          • 1 vote
                          #4.60 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:27 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          If Zimm didn't follow the bail hearing rules, then off to jail he should go.

                          There is another case of stand your ground law, where a man shot an unarmed man, from his car! The man in the car was not arrested, what's going on? What driving away wasn't an option?

                          Shooting someone should always be the last resort!

                          • 55 votes
                          #5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:35 PM EDT

                          Hummbird your first sentence is absolutly correct. It dosen't make any differance black, white, red, or whatever you want to call it. he didn't follow the rules, no excuses no BS off to jail he goes. If this was you or me there wouldn't be any question. See ya in court.

                          • 25 votes
                          #5.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:59 PM EDT
                          Comment author avatarDasvetExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                          The second passport has no stamp, and is not usable to get out of the country without that stamp. Zimmerman will be out of jail very quickly on bail using the money that I am thousands of others donated. A young wanna be tough teenager took his bad @ss mouth to a gunfight.

                          • 7 votes
                          #5.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:28 PM EDT

                          hummbird-3359530

                          If Zimm didn't follow the bail hearing rules, then off to jail he should go.

                          There is another case of stand your ground law, where a man shot an unarmed man, from his car! The man in the car was not arrested, what's going on? What driving away wasn't an option?

                          Shooting someone should always be the last resort!

                          In Pennsylvania in my city - we had something like this happen. Dude driving through a neighborhood stops at a guy who yelled to him "slow down". He gets out - gets into an altercation and ends up shooting and killing the guy who yelled at him. He claimed self defense and was convicted of murder. See? Not everywhere in this country is full of crazy gun toters.

                          • 9 votes
                          #5.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:35 PM EDT

                          You are correct. We are becoming too paranoid as a society. More and more people want to take the law into their own hands. We are making killing out of fear a normal thing. We call it " stand your ground," the government calls it "preemptive strike." One could simply set a condition for killing another by taking a beating enough to look like a victim, kill and go free. and indeed he was misleading with the judge and should be held responsible according to court protocol.

                          • 12 votes
                          #5.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:41 PM EDT

                          Are you kidding? "Taking a beating enough"? If you beat me at all, I'm shooting you.

                          • 11 votes
                          #5.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:46 PM EDT

                          Dasvet, why does he have a second passport without a stamp? I thought you could only get a passport via the government with a stamp, at least when I got mine it had a stamp. Makes you wonder huh. Fyi, I would never screw over a judge in a case. He needs to learn how to listen to his lawyer, which he is not doing.

                          • 6 votes
                          #5.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:52 PM EDT

                          Lot of people need shot, did you not watch the Hatfield's and the McCoy's

                          • 1 vote
                          #5.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:53 PM EDT

                          Eric -- Be careful about your response to a fist fight. Typically, only "REASONABLE FORCE" to protect yourself is legally justified. If you get into a bar fight, for example, even if the other guy started it and he's beating you, you think you have the right to whip out a gun and shoot him? I think not.

                          • 5 votes
                          #5.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:53 PM EDT

                          Dasvet, ignorance is bliss, so i guess u r 1 happy person.

                          Passports only get stamped when they are used to leave or enter a country (and not every time- I've had numerous occasions when the border agent didn't stamp mine,) so the only relevance here is that Zimm did not use his second passport since being released on bond.

                          Zimm is a chronic liar. His stupidity will hopefully result in his being in prison for the rest of his life. Then again, it is Florida, home of Casey Anthony and Rick Scott.

                          • 12 votes
                          #5.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:54 PM EDT

                          I'm betting it's an old expired passport and that he turned in his current valid one. He's back out on bail by monday.

                          • 5 votes
                          #5.10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:59 PM EDT

                          Hmm, there are some issues with these posts. First, if you are going to LIE under oath about how much money you have, you will lie about wrongfully killing someone. Second, if you approach someone with a gun and antagonize that person and THEY defend themselves and you kill them, YOU are a coward. Point blank. You should keep your punk a$$ to yourself, no altercation, no feeling of inadequacy, no smack down, no death. Plain and simple. And to the IDIOT that gave money to a MURDERER, I feel the sorriest for you. You condone murder and you are no better than he. I don't give a damn if the roles were reversed and Martin was alive instead of Zimmerman, Martin wouldn't get a friggin' dime of my hard earned money. Murder is murder. The problem is everyone is so jumpy and on edge, we don't know when to ignore IGNORANCE and rise above STUPIDITY. People walk around thinking they are above the law and that they ARE the law. Everyone needs to get a grip. No one should die because someone says something out of the way to them or they have a problem with the way someone looks. It's just plain stupid!!!!!

                          • 11 votes
                          #5.11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:09 PM EDT

                          This is just a paperwork issue, and will be resolved shortly, agreed. Now, if he tried to use it, that is another issue. I had two driver's licenses for a while, when I lost mine at a grocery store, and it wasn't returned to me for nearly three months. Was that a federal crime, because I left the old one in the nightstand and did not turn it in?

                            #5.12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:11 PM EDT

                            he didnt lie under oath about his finances, thats the courts and prosecutor playing legal games. the donations for his case are separate from their personal monies and cannot and would not be treated the same, so when a court asked the zimmermans how well THEIR finances were, they told the truth as the donated money is not part of the zimmermans income or savings or any assets they own and would not be counted as such. zimmerman is not receiving a fair trail and why is he in full restraints when he was on bail? or is msnbc only showing the initial courtroom photos of old? the passport has no credence.

                            so if zimmerman said he was rich would the bail then be raised? if so then that is very very very illegal for the courts to do. its so pathetically sad to see people who still will not see the truth when its spitting in their face, pure emotionally driven judgment with no facts and even after facts have come out these people will still not believe it and they will blast anyone who says different, these are the mental slaves of the world all the ready to be full fledged government slaves.

                            • 3 votes
                            #5.13 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:32 PM EDT

                            No actually I wouldn't shoot you but if you attack me as a 230lb man did I will put you in a wheelchair for the rest of your life. Is that reasonable enough?

                            • 1 vote
                            #5.14 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:48 PM EDT

                            Well Dasvet if you were pending trial for murder and the judge told you turn in your drivers license and you turned in one and kept the other and lied on the stand about it and your finances then yes, it's a crime and the judge can then order you to jail. Get it now?

                            • 4 votes
                            #5.15 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:04 PM EDT

                            ShakeDown, TakeDown, BreakDown.

                            George Z is GOIN' DOWN. The Good Life is over, gangsta.

                            HINT: Soap-on-a-rope prevents having to bend over.

                            • 6 votes
                            #5.16 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:24 PM EDT

                            Eric the Muy Terrible actually if someone kicked my butt. I would dust myself off. And the next time I saw them I would try harder to win with my Fists. Only wimps need guns out on the street. Wimps and cowards that hide behind them.

                            Protecting your home or family that's one thing. Hunting for food is another. Using a gun to avoid getting beat up. Yeah thats a coward

                            • 3 votes
                            #5.17 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:26 PM EDT

                            Mike416;

                            Sounds like your town is Philly or one of the other PA holes. Where a mugger stands on every other street corner, the NBPP intimidates voters and all charges are dropped and if someone invades your home, you must flee rather than defend it because the law won't allow you to. Is that about right? See?, not every part of the country is a nanny state, wastrel, hole where the criminal element has all the "rights" and the law abiding citizens are forced to be their victims by the very laws intended to protect them, rather than the misunderstood, under privileged, entitled criminals. Generalization is a beach, huh?

                            • 1 vote
                            #5.18 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:47 PM EDT

                            The white race will do what ever to please the Black race just to keep them from buring there down down and lotting there stores which has nothing concering the crime. I wish everyone would go to Mug Faces in not just there area but others and see witch race comments the most crime.

                            • 1 vote
                            #5.19 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:04 PM EDT

                            Nicodemus1946

                            Mike416;

                            Sounds like your town is Philly or one of the other PA holes. Where a mugger stands on every other street corner, the NBPP intimidates voters and all charges are dropped and if someone invades your home, you must flee rather than defend it because the law won't allow you to. Is that about right? See?, not every part of the country is a nanny state, wastrel, hole where the criminal element has all the "rights" and the law abiding citizens are forced to be their victims by the very laws intended to protect them, rather than the misunderstood, under privileged, entitled criminals. Generalization is a beach, huh?

                            Learn to read dolt. No one said the criminals have all the rights. You dont, however, have the right to shoot someone who calls you an idiot whilst you are acting like an idiot.

                            • 1 vote
                            #5.20 - Sun Jun 3, 2012 11:37 AM EDT
                            Reply

                            He also lied about not knowing about the donated 200k. The Orlando Sentinel is reporting that the prosecution said he and his wife were talking in code about it on the jail phones.

                            Lies, lies, lies. And if he can lie to the judge, imagine how he would lie to lowly Sanford cops that he considered so awful and pathetic. Hey...Georgie said that, not me.

                            The judge just ripped Georgie a new one and revoked the boy!

                            • 50 votes
                            Reply#6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:36 PM EDT

                            Oops..I meant he revoked the "bond"

                            • 18 votes
                            #6.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:51 PM EDT

                            Playing chicken with the court. What a moron. Yes, he should have his bail revoked just for his sheer stupidity. Oh and as for not surrendering the 2nd passport to the court being his lawyer's fault.... Oh please, that's what lawyers always say when their clients are dumb as a box of rocks.

                            • 25 votes
                            #6.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:17 PM EDT

                            I swear I want to know where the liberal left are getting all of these codes that everyone seems to be talking in. Everytime someone says something, they try to claim it's some form of code for racism. The obfuscation of the language by assigning words new meanings comes straight out of the leftist manuals. For Example:

                            Urban used to mean pertaining to a city environment.

                            Thug was a common low life street criminal.

                            Gay meant happy and carefree

                            Rainbows were what you saw on the side of plastic ponies and little girls bicycles, not the back end of a Prius.

                            If anyone is "talking in code" it's the liberal left.

                            BTW the person who threw the first punch is responsible for the fight, no matter what the other guy says to him. It's called the first amendment perhaps you should read up on it. Unless Zimmerman made physical contact with Martin, Martin's punch to Zimmerman's face started the fight. If people would lose the freaking chip on their shoulders and grow up, a lot fewer of them (and innocent bystanders who occasionally end in the crossfire) would end up in the morgue or prison. I guess the idea that you only have as many rights as you're willing to extend to everyone else needs to be taught in school. They also need to go back to teaching kids the rhyme about "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me."

                            Dr Martin Luther King Jr had a dream that his children would live in a country where they would be judged not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. Which of the two combatants in this altercation had the content of character that Dr King would've approved of, the juvenile delinquent or the hard working man who volunteered his time to protect his neighbors from a gang of thugs who had been preying on the neighborhood?

                            • 15 votes
                            #6.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:36 PM EDT

                            No. It's not the one who threw the first punch. It's the stalker with the gun that started it. And we know who did that.

                            • 18 votes
                            #6.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:02 PM EDT

                            The "Juvenile Deliquent" who was innocently walking down the street with a soda and pack of skittles against the guy following him with a gun in his hand.

                            Martin Luther King had a dream. WE have a nightmare.

                            With the media playing up the racial overtones of this case, Zimmerman is probably safer in jail than he will be on the street.

                            • 4 votes
                            #6.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:20 PM EDT

                            You were not there,you have no way of knowing the truth, but your comment stinks of racist /bias remarks. Zimmerman had plenty of time and counsel to come up with a story of his own. He could have started the fight then got beat up Who knows. He is the aggressor for confronting when told not to. You wonder why Black culture still has a chip on their shoulders? Just re-read your own comment.

                            • 8 votes
                            #6.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:22 PM EDT

                            The central fact remains that if GZ had followed 911 instructions, none of this would have happened.

                            • 2 votes
                            #6.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:14 PM EDT

                            The evidence points toward Zimmerman following the suggestion (not an order), when he replied, "ok" to "you don't need to do that".

                            • 1 vote
                            #6.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:59 PM EDT

                            Dasvet::: Evidence is pointing more and more towards Zimmerman doing just as he dam pleases about anything and everything. OK, it was a suggestion and not an order-- but anyone worth his salt would have done as was suggested. It is a suggestion, not an order, that you look both ways before crossing a street. So you think it is OK to just forget that suggestion? Many people have and the funeral is in a couple of days.

                            Did the judge just suggest that GZ reveal his financial status? Did the judge just suggest that he turn in his passport? I don't believe judges just suggest.

                            And evidence points toward GZ telling a boldface lie when he replied "OK". Evidence points toward GZ being a liar.

                            • 2 votes
                            #6.9 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 10:15 AM EDT

                            Susie-2759697

                            And evidence points toward GZ telling a boldface lie when he replied "OK". Evidence points toward GZ being a liar.

                            Which EVIDENCE is that? Please cite the evidence and source. The only source of EVIDENCE at this specific time would be the recordings and the 183 pages of discovery that have been released.

                            I agree George is not the sharpest crayon in the box. Throwing unfounded statements around like they are fact is not much better. You chose the word, not me. YOU have no PROOF that George lied when he said OK. You have no proof that he continued to follow after he said OK. Those are things that the prosecution, or you, will need to provided proof/evidence of. It is not up to the defense to prove a negative.

                            • 1 vote
                            #6.10 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 11:18 AM EDT

                            Zimmerman's bail should have never been revoked because he should have never been arrested to begin with. This whole trial is a sham, it's all lies just to make the Blacks happy. 98% of the evidence supports Zimmerman. I'm not sure what some people are thinking, but it's been proven that Zimmerman followed police orders and did not go after Trayvon. It was Trayvon who circled back around and attacked Zimmerman from behind according to the evidence. Once this fiasco is over I hope Zimmerman sues the DA, the Judge, the prosecuting attorney, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Eric Holder and Barack Obama. Everyone of these people were responsible for assigning guilt to Zimmerman when there was no evidence supporting their views.

                              #6.11 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 3:16 PM EDT
                              Reply

                              Revoke his bail and send the murder back to jail where he should have been from day one. If a criminal, or anyone for that matter wants to flee this country, it's very easy, especially for GZ, hell he's part Hispanic he'll blend in well crossing most borders.

                              • 16 votes
                              #7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:37 PM EDT

                              I thought he was white? The media told me so.

                              • 16 votes
                              #7.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:05 PM EDT

                              ok fine, he's "white hispanic".

                              • 2 votes
                              #7.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:12 PM EDT

                              Yeah he is going to flee like he did the last time. No one knew where he was and when the courts wanted him to come in he did. Such a flight risk. What a joke. Why not let an innocent man sit in prison until it is proven he is innocent

                              • 9 votes
                              #7.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:19 PM EDT

                              He is both hispanic and white. Whether or not he is a flight risk should be somewhat irrelevant. He isn't trustworthy enough to be afforded the benefit of the bond. He obtained it under false pretenses. He lied. Not sure why so many people are ready to jump in and defend a killer. I think it's just racism. It's amazing the things people will say on the internet because of the benefit of anonymity. At least we are clearly aware that we do not in fact live in a post racial society.

                              • 17 votes
                              #7.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:29 PM EDT

                              That's right Joe, innocent until proven guilty. And if you can't post bond or your bond is revoked, you sit in jail to ensure you show up in court. That's the way it works weather you like it or not. Besides, when you profile a young man whom has done nothing wrong, stalk him and confront him, you have just given up your right to use deadly force when you get your ass handed to you as a result. And that's the way that works. Weather you like it or not.

                              • 11 votes
                              #7.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:51 PM EDT

                              He didn't flee last time, he wasn't under arrest.

                              It isn't illegal to avoid Jesse Jackson and the black panthers.

                              Not yet anyway.

                              • 5 votes
                              #7.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:56 PM EDT

                              Joe for Zimmerman,

                              This is not a joke and the law should work the same for everyone. George Zimmerman lied, his wife lied and his attorney lied. So he should sit in jail and await trial just like everyone else who kills somebody. If he lied to get out of prison, It makes me more likely to believe that he lied about what happened between him and Trayvon. So sit it out George!

                              • 13 votes
                              #7.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:13 PM EDT

                              well with the help of his lunatic right wing nut job friends... I'm pretty sure he will get to spend some time there. What an idiot...he probably claimed entitlement to pro bono legal representation also.

                              • 3 votes
                              #7.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:18 PM EDT

                              Since when did one person shooting a kid and lieing to the court have anything to with race? I was raised people are people no matter how light or dark their skin is and whether or not they wear a dress. I can't believe how bad things have gotten again. Its so sad everything has to be about race or sex. Sorry but George Zimmerman needs to grow up and take responsibility for what his actions whether he thinks he was in the right or not. He shot and killed an unarmed 17 year old boy after he was told by 911 not to follow him and not to engage him.

                              • 6 votes
                              #7.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:24 PM EDT

                              He is not anything except the suspect in a crime at this minute. He is not a criminal until the jury decides he is after hearing all the evidence and rendering a verdict.

                              • 3 votes
                              #7.10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:51 PM EDT

                              I would have to agree with so many ppl. Zimmerman should not have followed Martin after he was told not to. That should throw syg law out of the window. The phone calls to 911 tells the story. ( Race) that's all media. That facts are the a man call 911, he was told to stop he didnt and now and child is dead. You can say that he did this because he's a racist. I really care if he is. What he did was wrong.

                              • 1 vote
                              #7.11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:28 PM EDT

                              Whatever the case for those minimizing what Zimmerman has said to date, this is the greatest news that I've heard in a long time! 'Suspect in a crime'? Oh dear, I do see his stories crumbling faster than the speed of sound, in light of the fact that he murdered a young black teen, rather than walking away.

                              George Zimmerman forever altered the life of Trayvon Martin, and with that, his life of freedom too. First rule is that he actually believed he was deserving of two passports, and totally unaware or actually ignorant of the fact that they are watching his every move.

                              • 3 votes
                              #7.12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:38 PM EDT

                              He needed a Gun to fight a teenager. Now the taxpayers of Florida get to pay to protect him in prison. He will have to fight bigger FELONS

                              His testimony is the one thing that would have maybe got him off.

                              Now they have him on TAPE lying and consorting with his wife to lie. About Money and withheld he had a second passport. The jury will hear how he lied to a court of law. And then are supposed to believe him about killing a kid. He is so screwed.

                              • 1 vote
                              #7.13 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:49 PM EDT

                              And Trayvon Martin-RIP changed ALL of our lives so we can fight our fights with good words and understanding we may not know what is right.

                              • 1 vote
                              #7.14 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:50 PM EDT

                              The only racism floating around is coming from irrational Zimmerman haters. You say he's not trustworthy, but he's done nothing to violate any trust. He never misled the Court about the money he collected for his defense. The Judge is mad because he didn't get as much bail money that he wanted. Bail amounts are supposed to correspond to the risk of flight. Zimmerman has never exhibited any risk. What's happened is bail money has become an income source for the States. This scam is the biggest miscarriage of Justice We've seen in a long time, Zimmerman should be sitting at home relaxing watching the ball games on TV instead of being used as a patsy to please racists immature Blacks. I fully expect Blacks to riot, burn, steal, assault and murder innocent people when Zimmerman is found not guilty.

                                #7.15 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 3:42 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                Ha! This is a stretch by the prosecution at best. The original passport became invalid when the replacement was issued. Any time you travel, they check the passport number. a replacement is given a new number and the old number becomes void. The finances...that's funny. He did not have control of the finances at the time, and therefore, did not misrepresent anything.

                                • 21 votes
                                #8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:38 PM EDT
                                Comment author avatarVanessafromDCExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                That is "IF" they check the numbers.....Nice try.

                                • 14 votes
                                #8.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:46 PM EDT

                                Vanessa they are checked by computer automatically nice try to you

                                • 25 votes
                                #8.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:53 PM EDT

                                The real racists are people who want to say this was about race when nothing shown to the public would lead someone to believe that. As for the rest of it...NOTHING to this point released to the public as "evidence" even shows for a fact that a crime was committed. Some people just want to continue to have "their opinions" about what happened. Why don't YOU stop being a racist and let the justice system work the way it is supposed to without adding YOUR ridiculous comments and assumptions. And just for the record...I am NOT defending Zimmerman either..IF he is guilty it will be proven in a court of law and he will get what he deserves...It is NOT for you, me, or anyone else to determine anything unless we happened to be on a jury hearing the case. The idiots throwing out OPINIONS on both sides is ignorant. Anyone who wants to judge and convict someone themselves after trying to accuse Zimmerman of doing that is nothing more then a hypocrite because they are doing the same thing they said was wrong...Maybe someone else should get over themselves and "look in the mirror" or possibly "stop smoking whatever they are smoking"..............

                                  #8.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:05 PM EDT

                                  Hate to tell you this, but you can have multiple passports.

                                  As an American, If you travel to say, Israel, and is stamped there, don't try to use it in Saudi Arabia or other Arab country. It won't be accepted. Solution...... second passport.

                                  • 5 votes
                                  #8.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:07 PM EDT

                                  If that's the case, he should have turned in the 2nd passport and kept the first. Would have made the judge's decision a non-issue. But he lied about that just like he's lying about what happened the night he shot Trayvon.

                                  • 19 votes
                                  #8.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:18 PM EDT

                                  It was still valid because of the dates and he could still travel with it. When he turned in the second one he should have turned in the first one just to save his self the headache. but we have to remember that was the second reason his bail was revoked. He also lied to the judge about his finances which helped set the bail amount from the start.

                                  • 7 votes
                                  #8.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:18 PM EDT

                                  XD, I'm sure it's perfectly ok for the average citizen to have more than one passport if they'd like, but not when you're wanted for murder!!

                                  • 9 votes
                                  #8.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:22 PM EDT

                                  VanessafromDC probably never had a passport before which shows you she doesn't know what she's talking about.

                                  Anytime you go through passport control TSA checks it in their database.

                                  Or do you think Zimmerman will slip out in disguise?

                                  • 6 votes
                                  #8.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:25 PM EDT

                                  Surely you're not that dense. The point is ...he retained a valid passport, in addition to lying about his finances in his testimony to the court. Say goodnight George.

                                  • 13 votes
                                  #8.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:30 PM EDT

                                  And yet it was the original passport that was turned into the court, not the second (replacement) passport. So what you're indicating is that the first passport wasn't even valid and yet that's the one Zimmerman handed over. Sounds devious to me. Add that to the fact that he also lied about his finances and there was more than enough there to fairly revoke his bail.

                                  • 14 votes
                                  #8.10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:33 PM EDT

                                  Why not? He slipped out of both police custody and jail in his disguise! I have a passport and have done some extensive traveling with it...and it is safe to say, when they swipe the passport, they just swipe it. Those lines for customs are soooooo damn long tht they just dont care firstly...secondly, when you are pending trial you KNOW to surrender your passport, BOTH if you are Zimmerman. He keeps lying, about everything...its like the guy dont have faith in the judicial system this country has worked so hard to establish. Why would he anyways? His father is a judge! This guy is wreckless and dangerous...never suffered a consequence in his life, so no wonder why he is the modern day Houdini....consequences seem like a foreign language to him. Do you have any thoughts on Zimmerman's behavior thus far? Trayvon Martin is nowhere to be seen...so the show is all about him. If you had not noticed, this is PUBLIC COURT, and all you do is under the microscope. So stop judging VanessaDC and clarify your own goddamned judgements. Turn the mirror on yourself!

                                  • 8 votes
                                  #8.11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:45 PM EDT

                                  Surely you're not that dense.

                                  Well you be sure to tell Vanessa that.

                                  The point is ...he retained a valid passport, in addition to lying about his finances in his testimony to the court. Say goodnight George.

                                  Could be a technicality. He could be back out on bail tomorrow or next week. What-cha gonna do then?

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #8.12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:48 PM EDT

                                  There are always strict provisions for a Bond, Zimmerman did not follow the rules so it is best that he goes back to jail. He lied and he was caught in his lie by the court. The judge made the right decision to revoke his Bond.

                                  • 12 votes
                                  #8.13 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:54 PM EDT

                                  Total BS. This whole thing is about the prosecution trying to make it so he can't afford to pay for a decent defense and to make it so the only media attention swaying the potential jury pool is what Martin's racist parents are putting out. These are Kangaroo Court tactics. He should be given a change of venue to outside of Florida. Anyplace else this would have already been adjudicated as self-defense. Total BS. The passport issue was nothing but a mistake by Zimmerman's attorney. There is no, none, zero indication that he had any intention of felling the jurisdiction.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #8.14 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:20 PM EDT

                                  smoke and mirrors, it was his website, the money's going into his pocket for defense, he lied, plain and simple. listen, if he's brass enough to go in and lie to a judge about bail, you think he's being honest about the shooting????? his credibililty just flushed down the toilet.

                                  • 7 votes
                                  #8.15 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:35 PM EDT

                                  Idiot, This incident clearly shows the devious side of Z. Remember that his dad was a judge, and is bzcking his son. Do not tell me that he was not aware of his intent in obtaining a new pastport. If he lied in order to get a replacement pastport then he should be charged for the offence. Z, still believes that he is above the law, bacause of his father connections,

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #8.16 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:39 PM EDT

                                  When someone perjures themselves, they perjure themselves. It doesn't matter if he knew about his financial situation or the passport or whatever. Zimmerman had counsel: he had the ability to determine his financial situation, even in jail. He perjured himself, plain and simple.

                                  Even if he's found not guilty, he could still go to prison for up to five years for this.

                                  • 5 votes
                                  #8.17 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:41 PM EDT

                                  Thanks for telegraphing the nature of your remarks in your first sentence. "Total BS."

                                  Even this is not Zimmerman's fault in your estimation....it's his attorney's.

                                  Precious.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #8.18 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:55 PM EDT

                                  debt, yes Zimmerman has counsel, this is his second set of lawyers who he won't listen to anyone. He will sink his own case with his antics. He is an idiot. He should listen to his lawyers.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #8.19 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:32 PM EDT

                                  Comment # 9 deleted, derail.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #8.20 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 6:55 PM EDT

                                  The way I understood it, Georgie turned in his valid passport. Then he informed whoever that his passport had been lost (or did he claim stolen). The passport was issued on the basis of his statement-- which was a lie. He must be a pathological liar-- it comes so easy to him.

                                  Sounds like the Liar faction was inherited.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #8.21 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 10:30 AM EDT

                                  Susie-2759697

                                  The way I understood it, Georgie turned in his valid passport. Then he informed whoever that his passport had been lost (or did he claim stolen). The passport was issued on the basis of his statement-- which was a lie. He must be a pathological liar-- it comes so easy to him.

                                  apparently you have NO clue what you are talking about.

                                  1. it takes several WEEKS to get a passport

                                  2. If a new passport had been issued this recently it would expire in 10 years not in 2.

                                  3. You have no proof under what circumstance the passport was reissued. It is possible he misplaced it and then found it again after receiving the replacement.

                                  As to which passport he surrendered. It has been stated elsewhere(this thread even #8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:38 PM EDT) that once a passport is replaced the prior one is VOID so he obviously surrendered the old one and apparently gave the current one to his lawyer. Don't let that fact be inconvenient to your STORY though. The judge even said the passport was not a major factor in his decision. Most likely because the lawyer had the passport and had surrendered it to the court, just late.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #8.22 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 11:25 AM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  The media groups say those aren't good enough reasons to keep what is usually a public record from being released.

                                  MEDIA GROUPS SAY??? Well screw them!! Just shows that they want to influence the case.. I think the safety for all those involved comes first... big deal what they say... most people are too stupid to go on facts and you can't trust MSNBC that's for sure... love how they edited the 911 calls...

                                  • 11 votes
                                  Reply#10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:41 PM EDT

                                  So you are saying that the Gov should be able to keep public information from the public? Good now we know who voted for the guys that created the Patriot Act.

                                  • 8 votes
                                  #10.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:58 PM EDT

                                  The useful idiots, as always!

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #10.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:13 PM EDT

                                  Since innocent people have already had death threats due to Spike Lee's ineptitude I do think it prudent for the court to consider protecting the witnesses.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #10.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:30 PM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  Second passport has never been stamped.

                                  Sorry never been out of country with a passport only on military orders. Since the second passport never been stamped does that make it useless?

                                  • 2 votes
                                  Reply#11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:42 PM EDT

                                  No, it means it's never been used, means as both of us know, that he got another one to replace the one he surrendered...period.

                                  Question...was he planning on taking a one way trip?

                                  • 15 votes
                                  #11.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:53 PM EDT

                                  Yes its useless. When the 2nd passport is issued the First passport becomes invalid. Each passport is numbered, and when a new one is issued the previous is deactivated.

                                  • 7 votes
                                  #11.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:00 PM EDT

                                  Nobody stamps a passport anymore.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  #11.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:00 PM EDT

                                  Do you have a passport dude? Because I just picked up my replacement one for a lost one last week and they had the number in the system and yes it becomes deactivated, but the only way it becomes his passport/active is when he signs it...there is no stamping!!!.

                                  • 4 votes
                                  #11.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:04 PM EDT

                                  He surrendered the one which was issued first and expired this month..and kept the second one that expires in 2014

                                  In other words he surrenedered the invalid one and kept the good one

                                  Then he lied about the money....not realy a good start with this judge

                                  • 18 votes
                                  #11.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:17 PM EDT

                                  He surrendered the one he said he lost....

                                  • 6 votes
                                  #11.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:20 PM EDT

                                  The first one is useless because they cancel out that number

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #11.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:39 PM EDT

                                  He surrendered the one he said he lost....

                                  As weak as "the dog ate it" excuses.

                                  • 6 votes
                                  #11.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:58 PM EDT

                                  He surrendered the one which was issued first and expired this month..and kept the second one that expires in 2014

                                  I'd like to see where you got that information, so far it has been reported both ways with no confirmation on which one got turned in. Other then that, it could of been the unexpired one that was not reported to the court as it is invalid and not needed to be reported.

                                  The first one is useless because they cancel out that number

                                  They don't need the stamp anymore because it is logged in to the federal system when it is swiped in the reader. Some heavily traveled countries still do stamp, but that is getting to be fewer and fewer. That's one of the reasons why they delayed implementation on use of US passports to go to Canada and Mexico a few years back, there was delays in getting to reader system operational and passports that would not read.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #11.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:37 PM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  Maybe a little to OLD? JUST REVOLKED as seen on MSNBC LOL.

                                  • 4 votes
                                  Reply#12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:43 PM EDT

                                  As in the Volkstead Act?

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #12.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:49 PM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  LOL,,,just came over the News,,,his Bail has been REVOLKED !!!!

                                  • 7 votes
                                  Reply#13 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:44 PM EDT

                                  learn to spell

                                  • 7 votes
                                  #13.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:20 PM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  I would feel the same if Z was black and Trayvon was white....

                                  Exactly. From my perspective, Zimmerman is a homicidal predator that almost got away with a thrill killing, because of the Stand your Ground Law.

                                  I do have to wonder what would have been the outcome if Z was black and Trayvonn was white.

                                  • 21 votes
                                  Reply#14 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:48 PM EDT

                                  OJ walked and both victims were white. Anymore questions?

                                  • 28 votes
                                  #14.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:54 PM EDT

                                  anyone got skittles?

                                  • 1 vote
                                  #14.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:00 PM EDT

                                  Stevie....give us a break! "...homicidal predator that almost got away..."? You be eating too many Skittles washed down with Arizona iced tea?

                                  • 6 votes
                                  #14.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:10 PM EDT

                                  What does OJ have to do with Zimmerman? Because OJ was incorrectly set free we should set free another murderer? Is that your logic? You're just picking sides based on race? You don't care about justice and safety for all people?

                                  • 6 votes
                                  #14.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:36 PM EDT

                                  Stevie, obviously, your perspective will always be from the black perspective. What else is new?

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #14.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:45 PM EDT
                                  John Keela Gracie Gillvia FacebookDeleted

                                  listen 2 yourself. Run 4 what. He had know idea that Zimmerman was going to shoot him.

                                  Just like he walk to the store he tried to walk back home. You don't feel sorry for him mother or his father. So stop lying to yourself. That's why Zimmerman going back to jail. For telling lies like he did the night he kill Tayvon and tried to use that stand your ground law. It will come all out in court buddy.

                                  • 5 votes
                                  #14.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:35 PM EDT

                                  Inner city education will take one far in this world.

                                    #14.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 10:28 PM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    GOOD!!!!

                                    • 15 votes
                                    #15 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:48 PM EDT
                                    Comment author avatarodb2Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                    blackboy took skittles to gunfight -thats all

                                    • 8 votes
                                    #15.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:00 PM EDT
                                    Comment author avatarNoelleGExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                    old dirty ba$tard2, you're an a$$hole...that is all

                                    • 8 votes
                                    #15.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:28 PM EDT

                                    You're just happy because he's non-black. If he was black you'd be screaming injustice from white white whitey.

                                    I'm going to exclaim "GOOD!!!!" when Zimmerman is found not guilty because there is plenty of reasonable doubt in the case.

                                    • 11 votes
                                    #15.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:31 PM EDT

                                    odb2, maybe if Trayvon (NOT blackboy) knew he was going to be a suspect in a cop-wannabe's drama of being a hero, he would have brought more to the fight instead of Skittles and a canned drink. But no, he just thought he was going to the store for some treats and didn't think to be prepared for a gunfight or ANY fight. Zimmerman belongs in jail.

                                    • 17 votes
                                    #15.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:34 PM EDT

                                    I'm not sure where your doubt lies. He admitted to killing a teenager. He could have stayed in his car. Where is your humanity?

                                    • 15 votes
                                    #15.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:37 PM EDT

                                    It's gonna be sweet when Zimmerman walks...

                                    • 7 votes
                                    #15.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:43 PM EDT

                                    robbopaloobop

                                    It's gonna be sweet when Zimmerman walks...

                                    You find a dead unarmed teenager "sweet" do you?

                                    • 14 votes
                                    #15.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:00 PM EDT

                                    It's not even reasonable doubt. It's downright innocence. Can GZ own a gun? Yes, second amendment guarantees him that right. Can GZ carry concealed? Yes, his permit allowed that. Was he attacked? Yes, the physical evidence corroborates that. Did he kill his attacker? Yes, that is called self defense.

                                    It is irrelevant if he got out of his car. He is allowed to leave his car if he wants. It's a free country.

                                    The fact that GZ is even being charged is a joke. Everyone, especially the special prosecutor knows this is all a big Potempkin production to satisfy the masses. What an enormous waste of time and money.

                                    • 6 votes
                                    #15.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:03 PM EDT

                                    @Rob,

                                    Under the law hey may very well walk. It still doesn't make it right or excuse what he did. And, regardless of color he voluntarily killed that young man.

                                    How sweet will it be if this happened to someone you loved?

                                    • 11 votes
                                    #15.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:03 PM EDT

                                    No, culheath, it will be sweet that a man's life isn't ruined because he lawfully defended himself.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #15.10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:05 PM EDT

                                    Dasvet

                                    No, culheath, it will be sweet that a man's life isn't ruined because he lawfully defended himself.

                                    Zimmerman already ruined his own life as well as many others. You have no more idea than anyone else at this point whether Zimmerman's actions were appropriate self defense, you're simply projecting that by asserting it as though true. Saying doesn't make it so.

                                    No matter what the outcome of the case, I find nothing about it sweet.

                                    • 11 votes
                                    #15.11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:13 PM EDT

                                    And you are assuming that Zimmerman is guilty, and you are projecting that it as though true. What is different about my assertion? I don't know exactly what happened that night, and neither do you. Not sending an innocent man to prison seems pretty sweet to me, but you believe otherwise?

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #15.12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:23 PM EDT

                                    Jeff, you're wrong, the man is not innocent. He may get off because of that asinine law, but he's not innocent.

                                    And guess what? Context matters, so try to wrap your mind around that.

                                    If the man does walk, after stalking and killing a TEENAGER (who are by definition often stupid), then I'm going to be one angry white person.

                                    • 6 votes
                                    #15.13 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:39 PM EDT

                                    you're simply projecting that by asserting it as though true. Saying doesn't make it so.

                                    Considering the evidence that has been release, it gives strong reasonable doubt. If you have the inside track to any secret "damning" evidence that you could prove, please provide it. And yes, he has ruined his life and others; but does that mean that he needs to be railroaded because people want him to be? I think that if this goes to trial, there will be an acquittal. Just too many loose ends, and not enough evidence to prove otherwise based on what is out right now. The only strong thing going (as far as been released) for conviction is the call to the girlfriend from Martin, and that can go either way as there is no way to prove or disprove the conversation besides the fact it took place.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #15.14 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:46 PM EDT

                                    Dasvet

                                    And you are assuming that Zimmerman is guilty, and you are projecting that it as though true. What is different about my assertion? I don't know exactly what happened that night, and neither do you. Not sending an innocent man to prison seems pretty sweet to me, but you believe otherwise?

                                    Re-read my post, there is nothing I said to indicate I think Z is guilty of anything except having shot Trayvon. You are assuming he is innocent by way of self-defense...you don't know that yet.

                                    All I know for certain is that Zimmerman initiated the sequence of events.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #15.15 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 9:17 PM EDT

                                    By being observant of his crime ridden neighborhood? If it is self defense it is not guilt. By that reckoning, a soldier is guilty of killing an enemy soldier. You are ignoring the circumstance. You ARE saying that Zimmerman is guilty of a crime, when you say he shot Trayvon, implying that he is guilty of murder. He isn't as of this date. Zimmerman isn't a criminal or he would not have a concealed carry permit. The CCL requires checking any applicant's criminal record. Trayvon's record is sealed because he is not an adult.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #15.16 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 11:04 PM EDT

                                    Dasvet::: You can be observant of your crime-ridden neighborhood and not shoot people just because you don't like Skittles and iced tea-- or the hoodie he was wearing.

                                    Just because it is a crime-ridden neighborhood doesn't mean that you get to shoot everyone you THINK committed a crime or MAY commit a crime.

                                    I wonder how many of the hot-headed white kids that live in that crime-ridden neighborhood committed crimes in that crime-ridden neighborhood.

                                    BTW-- a soldier killing an enemy soldier happens in war and war is a different circumstance. At least it was in the past. Oh well, things are different now than they were back in WW2. No, I didn't serve in that war-- they didn't take seven-year-olds. But I lived through it-- and my dad served in WW2.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #15.17 - Sat Jun 2, 2012 10:52 AM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    holy @!$%#!!!!! leave it to the liberal media to get them to revoke his bond. savages

                                    • 8 votes
                                    Reply#16 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:49 PM EDT

                                    So,,,the Media did it?,,,,,wow, get your haed out of the sand jager.

                                    • 24 votes
                                    #16.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:54 PM EDT

                                    Of course the media did it just like them getting him arrested in the first place. If it was not for the liberal media we would have never even heard about this. They leave so much out but a thug gets shot by someone defending themselves and everyone is all freaking out. Teaching everyone not to defend teir own or stick up for their cimmunity. This whole circus act is a joke it will get stretched out then he will be found not guilty and then we can have some more riots. No one rioted when OJ got off for killing a white girl but this is different.

                                    • 12 votes
                                    #16.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:04 PM EDT

                                    OJ was innocent, or so said the jury. Although you can argue with the juries verdict, you can't prove OJ shot and killed anybody. We know for a "fact" Zimmerman shot and killed Treyvon. I'm not saying he was justified or he wasn't justified, but he did shoot him (fact). Stop comparing apples with oranges.

                                    • 17 votes
                                    #16.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:19 PM EDT

                                    Why of course, bobr4350. It makes perfect sense that the liberal media would convince Zimmerman to lie about his financial situation. That is the only way the liberal media could guarantee the judge would revoke Zimmerman's bond. We all know that Zimmerman wants to be in prison for murdering an unarmed teenager.

                                    • 8 votes
                                    #16.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:29 PM EDT

                                    Man calls cops about suspicious person. Cops say 'Okay, we're on it'. Guy says 'I'm following him'. Cops say "We don't need you to do that.' A person ends up dead at the hands of the caller. I would think that would require at least some kind of investigation and probably followed by a trial. If it hadn't of been for the media, it's unlikely an investigation would have ever occurred. Lots of stuff has been blown out of proportion and misrepresented since then, but the fact remains that this should have been investigated from the beginning.

                                    With that said, I believe Zimmerman will walk. While it's clear to me that Zimmermans actions are what caused the incident to happen, everything beyond that point is not clear. Who started the actual fight? Who threw the first punch? If Zimmerman hadn't of shot, what would have happened? It's very unlikely there is enough evidence to prove 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.

                                    • 5 votes
                                    #16.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:35 PM EDT

                                    Zimmerman has no right to watch out for his neighborhood? That is the only reason you have that Zimmerman caused the fight? Zimmerman said "ok" when cautioned by "you don't need to do that", which indicates he understood that. A man wanting to shoot someone does not call the cops in the real world. It was investigated from the beginning, Zimmerman was arrested, handcuffed and taken to the police station where the arresting officers determined that he acted in self-defense according to the SYG law in effect in Florida. I am sure that Zimmerman didn't know how much money had been donated to his cause, since it was an non-going situation.

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #16.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:54 PM EDT

                                    Wow it's okay to call Martin a thug but, not Zimmerman killer. Either way it's a death that could've and should've been avoided. If only Zimmerman had listened to the dispatcher we would'nt be going through this now. Now that's done and over with a trial will soon come. Zimmerman claims to act in selfdefence but he's showing all the signs of a guilty man. 1st misleading the courts of finacial stabilty, now 2nd passport even if he was innocent it, this situation will put a dent in his credetibilty.

                                    • 13 votes
                                    #16.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:55 PM EDT

                                    The liberal media made Zimmerman lie about the money and withhold information that he had a second passport. Shame on them.

                                    • 5 votes
                                    #16.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:00 PM EDT

                                    Zimmerman stated "ok" when asked not to follow the suspect. No evidence has come forth that he did not do that. If Zimmerman is convicted on this flimsy, edited, MSDNC hyped evidence, then we are all in trouble if we try to watch our neighborhoods..

                                    • 3 votes
                                    #16.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:02 PM EDT

                                    Ok or okay means yes; but since you feel that's not what he meant why not just say NO?

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #16.10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:08 PM EDT

                                    What post are you answering, Cowboy. If it isto my post, then please explain what you are saying.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #16.11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:19 PM EDT

                                    @trm2008,

                                    first of all let's get something straight, know one can make anyone lie that usually instinctual when a person is trying to hide something. It really doesn't matter how you racist try and justify George Zimmerman's action or even intentions he is a murderer and he is going to pay for his wrong doing. You know the saying "karma is a Bi**h" well now it's pay back time for him. No bad deed goes unpaid for. I must say though, your statement was the dumbest I've heard today it's even laughable just like you are. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Don't drop the soap George.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #16.12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:22 PM EDT

                                    first of all let's get something straight, know one can make anyone lie that usually instinctual when a person...

                                    Evidently, the dripping sarcasm in my remark flew right over your head. Of course no one made Zimmerman lie.

                                    I must say though, your statement was the dumbest I've heard today

                                    It was supposed to be. I do believe that you laughing at me because you failed to recognize such obvious sarcasm doesn't exactly convey intelligence on your part. But, by all means, keep laughing.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #16.13 - Mon Jun 4, 2012 12:47 PM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    Oh boy here we go again!!! I must say though that I found it unusual that a person could get bond when they were charged with second degree murder. But your laws are so much different than ours here in Canada I just assumed it could be done there for whatever reasons. I have always wished Canada could be tougher on crime just like the US but in this case I am finding the law really wishy washy. Firstly here Canada he would have been arrested right at the scene with the probable cause being that there was a dead body laying there and Zimmerman saying he shot him in self-defence. Well here that is for the courts to decide not the police but I feel being Zimmerman's dad is a former judge had something to do with this. But now it is getting ridiculous with all the leaks of different documents and yes he is being tried in the press with us not knowing the complete story. Personally I am not a Zimmerman fan nor am I a fan of this Stand Your Ground law and I believe this whole thing could have been avoided if Zimmerman would have stayed in his van and minded his own business once the police were called. But he had an agenda of some sorts on his mind and with the drugs he was taking on a regular basis that could have a lot to do with it. They are the types of drugs that can make you agressive and cloud your thinking but noone seems to want to focus on that - just that the boy has a minut amount of pot in his system. Trust me I know that Zimmerman's drugs had much more of an effect on him than the tiny bit of pot found in Trayvon's system. But are people focusing on that - no and I hear it wont even be allowed in. From all I have read they should just release Zimmerman now because this case has been so poorly handled that he is going to walk so why drag it out. I dont care about Trayvon's background - whether he was a troubled kid or not - he did not deserve to die that night and why on earth was Zimmerman carrying a gun as a Security Guard (not even an official one) that night. And how will anyone ever be able to prove that in Zimmerman's mind he felt threatened. You cant - he says he was and Trayvon has no voice from the grave. This case just makes me sick and when I read all the comments favoring Zimmerman and putting Trayvon down I just get angry that people would come down more on a dead kid than take an honest look at the perpetrator. Sure blame the victim - what on earth can he say. I dont care if Zimmerman is convicted anymore but I do wish him a very long and miserable life. Oh and doctor - when he gets out you had better up his meds cause he will need that!!!

                                    • 44 votes
                                    #17 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:50 PM EDT

                                    Very well said!

                                    • 16 votes
                                    #17.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:16 PM EDT

                                    Best comment I have read yet regarding this tragic event. No one can explain to me how I can chase a kid with a gun then get so scared that I had to shoot him. The racism in this country has reached astronomical heights. All colors need to speak - no - YELL out that this must end now. And the 30% of crazies that won't change need to be isolated and ignored. No press coverage - no nothing - just ignored.

                                    • 21 votes
                                    #17.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:30 PM EDT

                                    My feelings exactly. I, however, hope this idiotic imbecile with the mind of a kid playing "cowboys & indians", will go through trial and then convicted and sent to jail for a long time. He needlessly took someone's life. which wouldn't have happened if a professional cop had taken care of the matter, while he sat in his car.

                                    • 16 votes
                                    #17.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:30 PM EDT

                                    But in Canada the maximum sentence for First Degree Murder is 25 years. You automatically get one year off for every two years of good behavior. Thus a mass murder would be out in 15 years if he said he was sorry and behaved himself.

                                    Also, since there is no First Amendment equivalent in Canada we would know very little of this case, only that it happened. There would have been no media frenzy about it and Zimmerman, if he was not convicted of illegal possession of a handgun, would already be free and no one would know.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #17.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:33 PM EDT

                                    well, this this then....apparently they the people living in that neighborhood were having problems the police couldnt respond to quickly enough or ever reallly...esp here in the usa...so they had to have neighborhood watches...well, zimmerman was doing his job in that neighborhood...he probably wasnt the only neighborhood watch...he saw something suspicious and huge trayvon not the little boy portrayed earlier..and then the speaches edited out ...not good ..that was a media left view...lying which is what they do best..and then zimmerman persuing trayvon on foot and then the police saying are you persuing him and zimmerman saying yes and then being told by the cops to stop....zimmerman proceeded to walk and look for trayvon not seeing him...he went bk to his truck whereupon trayvon appears out of nowhere confronting zimmerman...and then pounding the heck out of him and zimmerman yelling for help as trayvon is huge and zimmerman fears his life because hey there are thugs in that neighborhood commiting crimes...and trayvon is bigger then zimmerman towering over him so why wouldnt he think he was a man not a boy.....so the gun he was carrying and justifiably because neighborhood watch should be with protection....in case he was attacked and was ...why didnt trayvon just go to his uncles house..why did he decide to suprize zimmerman and then attack him....if he had gone bk to the apt then he would be alive today....both men thought the other was up to no good...that is a given...but to actually attack when knowing that the guy following you had given up and gone bk to his truck...that is still in question...what is up with that....unless he was use to doing these kinds of things...at the begining there was a mention of a backpack that had jewelry in it...I havent heard anything about that since..what happened there...this is a witch hunt...a racist witch hunt and believe me I cant see how you can even say that its a white on black thing when hispanics call us whites gringo's...haha....I dont think this was a racial thing at all ..what it was ..was identifying someone who looked like they werent partof the neighborhood who was huge looking a man not a woman walking at night and there being crimes commited there anyway...as far as the money there was known before that they were trying to get money for defense ...what is that a suprize and in the begining there wasnothing ..but over timemoney was collected...then having another visa ...so what he wasnt gone...he was still there and why not think of leaving the country when you think in that country your not going to get a fair trial...because the blacks are on the move....they call hispanics white...so the hispanics now need to know they are in our class now...the white class....i have to say that not all blacks think the same....there are some who didnt vote for obama because he was black....which really shows their hand....how racist they are....I listen to the words of what a person says....and then what they do...and the people that they surround themselves with....you want honesty and justice not a media driving race fighting people passing judgement....this is sooo wrong..and then threats by the black panthers .....causing fear even in the family that is wrong....its sad that someone died...I feel for trayvons mother...and family....but he was the one who attacked the person following ...why did he ffeel he needed to attack someone and be aggressive....zimmerman was taking drugs that were perscribed...I take drugs perscribed.....seizure drugs that do make people aggressive....in my case its not physical aggression...if you are going to get onto someone for taking meds then that would be most of the world....I dont think the pot trayvon smoked afffected him ...it wears off quickly....what it shows is the fact that he doesnt mind breaking the law....so what else was he doing....

                                    • 7 votes
                                    #17.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:49 PM EDT

                                    Actually I do care about al the facts. I do care about all teh factors that came into to play that night. I do care about due process of law. I also support stand your ground and the castle laws fully. Yes I care about the whole story. It all matters. But that is what the oublic is not allowed to have. We only get bits and pieces and are swayed to think one way or the other. But One thibng is very true. Zimmerman is innocent till proven guilty and should be treated as such.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #17.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:54 PM EDT

                                    SHar, he WAS arrested at the scene, handcuffed, and taken to the police office, despite what MSNBC said. The police station, at the station, decided that Zimmerman met the apparent evidence needed to be freed. It is hard to believe posters here haven't read and seen that fact.

                                    • 6 votes
                                    #17.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:58 PM EDT

                                    I don't know about all that Shar. Can a Canadian citizen even own a gun? I guess if you feel your are threatened with death, no matter the circumstances, you should just accept it? What if Zim had used a rock or a stick laying in his proximity to inflict death on Trayvon? Would that satisfy everyone? You don't have to be a real cop in the US to legally carry a loaded weapon.,

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #17.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:00 PM EDT

                                    Archie, I sure wouldn't defend myself if I was being belted on the head by someone. Yeah, right! It would be so apparent that the beating would just stop by its self. I would certainly not want to have a charge of defending myself on my record, would you?

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #17.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:15 PM EDT

                                    @vickie-239905,

                                    Maybe you should proofread what write before you send it off for everyone to read. I am aware that being racist has it's limitations but you can fixed that by going back to school. Reading and writing is fundamental idiot. Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #17.10 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:50 PM EDT

                                    eyy you hoser..

                                      #17.11 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:53 PM EDT

                                      From all I have read they should just release Zimmerman now because this case has been so poorly handled that he is going to walk so why drag it out.

                                      There lies the crux of the problem, it was still under investigation before the protests started, but things were rushed in order to please the mob. It makes a difference. My family waited 6 years for officers to prove a man killed his wife, and then killed my cousin to make it look like a murder-suicide. Were we upset, yes we were. But we had to wait until technology and evidence caught the guy in a lie. Now the guy is serving life in prison (was death before the governor commuted all sentences) with no chance of parole. And in the case of Martin-Zimmerman, it looks like to rush to justice will end up letting Zimmerman walk free even if he did provoke the situation (which looks more and more doubtful the more evidence released.) I want justice done, but I don't like it at the pace of mob justice.

                                      Also, since there is no First Amendment equivalent in Canada we would know very little of this case, There would have been no media frenzy about it and Zimmerman, if he was not convicted of illegal possession of a handgun, would already be free and no one would know.

                                      Actually, that would be second amendment, the first is of free speech (which many here display here with their ignorance.) As to the second part, it has become a matter of spinning the story to make it more appealing to the media. Here, it is getting to the point of right and wrong and legality, it is of baser emotions. In this case, as it was initially reported, it was white guy shoots black kid, and that equal media attention almost automatically. Most of the items reported at the beginning of this story has been disputed by even the prosecutors own evidence, but many on this seed still try to use them as facts. And when that fails, they use emotional arguments instead of law.

                                      Can a Canadian citizen even own a gun?

                                      Yes they can, they're highly restricted.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #17.12 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:09 PM EDT

                                      Manns1963 Love You! You're so right reading is fundamental! Vickie can you spell MEDS?

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #17.13 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:26 PM EDT

                                      OH CANADA, you get it, and your laws reflect that you get it. Bless you for bringing some sanity to the continent!

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #17.14 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:35 PM EDT

                                      Vickie may be an awful writer grammatically, but what she wrote was true. Please just go by the content of what she wrote...this isn't a writing contest! Many others posting here would flunk English 101 as well!

                                      Much blame goes to the current PATHETIC state of education in this country!

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #17.15 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:36 PM EDT

                                      Annie, when the truth hits the libs right in the face, they revert to being grammar police.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #17.16 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 7:47 PM EDT

                                      @Annie-1496690,

                                      Oh please stop blaming everything around you for your illiteracy. Can you just take responsibility for your own intelligence or lack there of? That's so typical. And as far as her point, how can anyone decipher what the point is if they can't even understand what is being said. English 101 has nothing to do with that idiots grammar. Hate, ignorance, and LACK OF KNOWLEDGE is to blame for this one, not even the pathetic state of education in this country as you so claim. And as far as I'm concern nothing she has says has an inch of truth behind it. A racist nor bigot ever speaks the truth, they only spew hate.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #17.17 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 10:25 PM EDT
                                      Reply

                                      This isn't about race, it is about a stupid law, that is being abused, stand your ground, go look up the stat's, all you have to say is I feared for my life, because you are losing a fistfight, and your the one armed?

                                      What happened to running away, shooting in the air, or aiming to wound not kill?

                                      Hey if someone breaks into your home, shoot first ask questions later, But if you go and initiate a dispute, or confront someone, they might feel justified in punching your lights out, because they don't know if your some crazy man that wants to kill them!

                                      I just want some justice and sanity back! Stand your ground laws, are just stupid! Because if their is only one man standing and no witness's, we have the Zimmerman, Martin case!

                                      • 25 votes
                                      #18 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 2:51 PM EDT

                                      The reason why this is such a hot topic is because this is about race. The reason why so many people attack Trayvon is because he was black and they don't care about dead black people. They dont' care about justice for everyone. I believe that George Zimmerman murdered Trayvon. I don't think he set out to do it, but he's a loose canon. I think Trayvon was just trying to get home, but George thought otherwise because he is black. Also, since when is it impossible for hispanics to be racist against blacks? Just because George tutored a black student doesn't make him impervious to racism. He thought Trayvon was up to no good because he was black. Period.

                                      • 16 votes
                                      #18.1 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:22 PM EDT

                                      Recently a young black woman shot a gun into the ceiling of her home to scare her abusive ex-husband away from her baby girl and herself. The florida judge refused to let the young woman declare a "stand your ground" defense and sentenced the young black woman to a "mandatory" 20 year sentence for discharging a firearm......go figure.

                                      • 14 votes
                                      #18.2 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:27 PM EDT

                                      I thought you said earlier that Zimmerman was very smart and knew how to get out of any charges. Trayvon was probably up to no good.

                                        #18.3 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:31 PM EDT

                                        'prob up to no good,' what an idiotic statement... so, Tray deserve to be murdered in cold blood, shame on you

                                        • 7 votes
                                        #18.4 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 3:53 PM EDT

                                        I think Dasvet is just a troll. He wants to get under people's skin by saying hateful remarks. It's best to ignore bullies.

                                        • 8 votes
                                        #18.5 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:00 PM EDT

                                        truthhurts - she broke a number of laws there.

                                        You can't shoot into the ceiling of your home to scare someone.

                                        You can't use a gun unless your life is in danger.

                                        • 3 votes
                                        #18.6 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 4:02 PM EDT

                                        Vickie239905

                                        You just sit there and put on this Blog a lot of lies and you should be shamed!!! You were not there nor was I so I can't say with any certainty what happened between the two of them. I can think of many reasons that a person would do what you have done without firsthand knowledge and one is that you are just a Racist!

                                        I do feel that this Judge has seen most if not all of the evidence that was handed over for indictment, he is obviously afraid that Zimmerman will try to run and can't be trusted. Some of you folks have donated and given money simply because the kid is BLACK not because you think Zimmerman is innocent.

                                        Perhaps your money will serve him well at the Prison Commissary because he is going to need it.

                                        • 4 votes
                                        #18.7 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:07 PM EDT

                                        bf, her life was in danger. It was not just an arguement. To top it off, she had just had a baby.

                                          #18.8 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:21 PM EDT

                                          Not so much a stupid law; it's someone stupid abusing the law!

                                          • 1 vote
                                          #18.9 - Fri Jun 1, 2012 5:30 PM EDT