174-foot Army landing craft runs aground, spills fuel into Alaskan bay

Petty Officer 3rd Class Jonathan Klingenberg / U.S. Coast Guard

The Army vessel Monterrey is grounded on Puffin Island in Chiniak Bay near Kodiak on Saturday. A boom was placed around the vessel to help contain spilled diesel.

A 174-foot Army Reserve landing craft carrying equipment to help move an Alaskan village struck a rock in a bay near Kodiak, then was run aground to keep the vessel from sinking, causing thousands of gallons of fuel to spill, Coast Guard and Army Reserve officials said Saturday.

The Monterrey was crossing Womens Bay with a crew of 15 aboard on Friday night when it struck a submerged rock, said Petty Officer 3rd Class Grant DeVuyst, a Coast Guard spokesman in Kodiak. The Coast Guard received a Mayday about 10:15 p.m. local time, and the vessel was grounded about four miles away on Puffin Island in Chiniak Bay, DeVuyst told msnbc.com.


Two fuel compartments appeared to have been breached, spilling more than 15,000 gallons of diesel fuel, DeVuyst said. He said that the fuel was expected to disperse but that the Coast Guard was working to get skimmers in to clean up any remaining diesel.

The Monterrey was traveling from Port Hueneme, Calif., to Bethel in western Alaska, carrying a load of construction equipment and vehicles for the Marine Corps, said Maj. Annmarie Daneker, media relations officer with the Army Reserve in Fort Bragg, N.C.

Daneker told msnbc.com that three crew members who suffered minor injuries were taken to Kodiak, treated and released.

Daneker said the first focus would be on cleaning up any spilled fuel, then getting the equipment off the Monterrey. She said the Army Reserve would dispatch another vessel to pick up the equipment unless the Marine Corps required a quicker effort.

The construction equipment was to be used in a federal project to move the villagers of Newtok to Mertarvik, about nine miles away, the Army Reserve said in a statement. The Marine Corps is leading the construction of an emergency shelter, homes, roads and an airfield for the villagers.

Newtok, a Yupik Eskimo village of about 400 people on the Ninglick River in western Alaska, is threatened by erosion and melting and sinking permafrost. 

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3

What's even worse is that the vessel grounded on Puffin Island and everybody had to put out their cigarettes.

  • 8 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 10:34 PM EDT

Ugh... it really pains me to reply...

THAT WAS BAD!

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:51 AM EDT

I wonder why they did that?

    #1.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:49 AM EDT

    Uh oh, I see this coming, Now Obama will ground all of the Army ships.

    • 3 votes
    #1.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:32 AM EDT

    Look at that pathetic picture. You can see fuel leaking out around the boon perimeter.

    The army doesn't have any clues.

    Spill cleanup is archaic. I'm sure the oil companies don't care and would not have anything better but why not

    ask them. Let's find out !!!!!!!! And if they don't - make them do better. They have enough of our money.

    Infact, the top 5 execs should go to prison in the next oil/fuel spill over 1,000 gallons.

    That would give them reason to improve and create better responses, don't you think ?

    • 2 votes
    #1.4 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:53 AM EDT

    Lee2-3538213: You summed it up perfectly! It's high time we stop the big oil companies from controlling our energy source and really push efforts to use alternatives. This is totally disgusting and unnecessary. This country put a man on the moon in less than a decade--there's no reason why--EVEN NOW--that we have to stay in the stone age and use oil for everything.

    I lived in Kodiak back in 1989 when the Valdez oil spill occurred. You should have seen the water--and talk about jobs! So many fishermen had no work for months because of that accident.

    • 2 votes
    #1.5 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:14 PM EDT

    Let us all gather to shed crocodile tears for this "oil spill!"

    Yes, many years ago we DID "put a man on the moon," several, in fact. That, of course was not THIS GENERATION who can't see the moon from their Ipods and computer games. We didn't get our international rating of 25th in math for not learning math!....OK, OK, That is EXACTLY how we did it!

    I have been living in Alaska for more than 50 years. Some fishermen may have had to change their location, but most simply totaled up their losses and sued Exxon for that. It is one of the big, emotional stories here to tell everyone that the oil "will never go away." The fact is, we had much more oil spilled during World War II than what has happened in recent years. But the fishermen and businessmen here, as they are now doing in the Gulf of Mexico are coming up with eternally creative ways to collect money from oil companies.

    The oil will get cleaned up...you can go back to your previous plans. . . to learn NOTHING from the past.

    • 2 votes
    #1.6 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:37 PM EDT

    Aren't there depth-finders to avoid rocks? Did the rocks just sneak up on them?

    • 1 vote
    #1.7 - Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:16 PM EDT

    darned sneaky stealth rocks...

    • 1 vote
    #1.8 - Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:46 AM EDT
    Reply

    this is what happens when the jar heads don't use their regular taxi service...

    • 17 votes
    Reply#2 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 10:41 PM EDT

    oops somebody will get a slap on the wrist for this one.

      #2.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:57 AM EDT

      Charts do exist. You just have to use them.

      • 3 votes
      #2.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:26 AM EDT

      Multi-service operations always turn out badly, especially when one of their names begins with "A".

      • 2 votes
      #2.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:37 AM EDT

      VH NAVY:

      HAHAH! ROTF -- I like your style, friend! They aren't any better across the pond, either!

      • 1 vote
      #2.4 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:06 AM EDT

      At least it didn't turn into a Schettino disaster.

        #2.5 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:40 AM EDT

        Firmly agree with "VHNavy"

          #2.6 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:18 PM EDT

          Charts do exist. You just have to use them.

          First rule of navigation: Don't take your ship where the birds walk. Nautical charts are quite useful in determining where birds walk.
          Second Rule of navigation - Never ask the skipper to hold your beer...

          • 1 vote
          #2.7 - Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:40 AM EDT
          Reply

          I'm a former Marine and I can't help but agree with VH Navy. Why in hell does the US Army have to have landing craft? We have the best Navy in the world and they know how to land a boat withut crashing into the rocks.

          • 32 votes
          Reply#3 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 10:48 PM EDT

          It is operated by the navy Mikatoga, The headline is wrong, It was carrying Corp of engineers equipment and they made a rather extreme leap that the united states has a sea going army...lol. They did a good job here in this case. When ever your toting diesel the best thing for everyone is a grounding and the vessel in question is designed to do just that Land. The diesel will be evaporated within two days and unlike crude, no nasty shore lines to clean.....Peace.

          • 6 votes
          #3.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:12 AM EDT

          @jeffery f - Wrong, grasshopper! The U.S. Army has operated transport vessels for many decades. There is a move afoot to transfer the Army's fleet to the U.S. Navy, but you know how slowly bureaucracies work! Maybe in our children's lifetimes...

          • 5 votes
          #3.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:45 AM EDT

          Next thing you know..the Navy will have their own planes!..........

          Huh...my tongue is in my cheek!

          • 5 votes
          #3.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:09 AM EDT

          jeffery wrong the diesel will not evaporate in 2 days. some of it will dilute in the water and a very small portion will evaporate but diesel is high in oil content and does not evaporate.

          • 6 votes
          #3.4 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:44 AM EDT

          A pity that whomever was in command didn't know how to read a nautical chart. Maybe someone just pointed and said, "Thataway, yer doan need no map."

          • 2 votes
          #3.5 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:18 AM EDT

          Orb

          maybe the rock isn't on a chart.

          • 4 votes
          #3.6 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:25 AM EDT

          @Darthdon sorry that deal got finalized. The Navy got all the HSVs and the Army kept their fleet.

          • 1 vote
          #3.7 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:06 AM EDT

          It said 'reserves' .... I don't think they borrowed it without permission...

            #3.8 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:08 AM EDT

            The Air Force operates three 120-foot drone recovery vessels and two smaller vessels to recover aerial targets and support range safety, patrol, and salvage operations, at Tyndall AFB, FL.

              #3.9 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:47 AM EDT

              @ bluethunder, diesel is almost identical to JP5 which is primarily aircraft fuel and essentially both are kerosene. As far as dilution, not any out side of its natural hydrogen atom will do so, the rest like dumped aircraft fuel will evaporate nothing needs to be cleaned.

              @ Darthdon, I was a navy lad for 8 years, the skippers on all sea going military vessels are trained by and in the US Navy. The army doesn't train ANY officer to control open water vessels. It would be like sending a microbiologist to a space shuttle as captain. Corp of engineers have flagged vessels but the handlers are all Skippy's, sorry cowboy.....peace

                #3.10 - Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:38 PM EDT

                You all shouldnt talk bout things you dont know. I know for a fact that the Army has boats and they arent run by the Navy because I work on those boats. I have worked on this one also. The boats are run by Warrant Officers from the Army and manned with Army crews. They are 88L and 88K.

                • 1 vote
                #3.11 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:33 PM EDT

                143rd TRANSCOM Hua! Now 143rd ESC.

                • 1 vote
                #3.12 - Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:52 PM EDT
                Reply

                They're Infantry swabby not jar heads.
                I don't think a grunt was driving the boat but if I'm wrong I'm sure someone will be on here to correct me.

                  Reply#4 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 10:53 PM EDT

                  army boats are driven by the army, and the jar head comment was for the fact that they were hauling uncle sam's misguided children's gear....and watch the swabby comment us enlisted airedales walk upright..lol

                  • 8 votes
                  #4.1 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:03 PM EDT

                  Uncle Sams Confused Group to the rescue .

                  • 3 votes
                  #4.2 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:43 PM EDT
                    #4.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:07 PM EDT
                    Reply

                    why again was the eskimos being moved? melting iceburgs? is this normal?

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#5 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 10:56 PM EDT

                    "Erosion and melting and sinking permafrost", and no, it's not normal-- or it wasn't. Thanks to climate change, it is now. And all of you chiming in with "There's no such thing," try talking to some of the people losing their homes because of it.

                    • 6 votes
                    #5.1 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:08 PM EDT

                    I'm wondering why they are paving roads and building an airstrip near the melting/sinking permafrost.

                    It will just sink in a few more years.

                    • 5 votes
                    #5.2 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:21 PM EDT

                    Sane, they are making roads and an airstrip so I can get all my gold mining equiptment in.

                    • 5 votes
                    #5.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:35 AM EDT

                    Yes it's normal, it happens every 250 years.

                    • 1 vote
                    #5.4 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:28 AM EDT

                    Every 250 yrs? I wish I could make up numbers like that in my checking account. I wonder when we gave up science and went back to superstition for a basis of out decisions. Just shows how brainwashed people have become by the corporations that rule the country and how our education system has failed.

                    • 4 votes
                    #5.5 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:35 AM EDT

                    if it's anything other than spongebob and dorito's, it's abnormal.

                      #5.6 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:35 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      This is what you get when you put horse drivers in boats.

                      They even do worse in aircraft.

                      Leave their feet on the ground where they belong.

                      • 7 votes
                      Reply#6 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 10:56 PM EDT

                      Well, because of "Affirmative Action" and "Diversity" nowadays anybody can be the captain, even if it is a certified idiot.

                      • 11 votes
                      #6.1 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:03 PM EDT

                      Midnight: Racist much? When you talk about "certified idiots" you should be looking in the mirror.

                      • 6 votes
                      #6.2 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:09 PM EDT

                      Hey Hoodie-Doodie, try to learn some US History, a few decades ago, if there were 10 ships, the ten captains would be the best of the best, the best qualified individuals. Now, because of "Affirmative Action", "Diversity" and crap like that, the 10 captains are: one hispanic, one african american, one asian american, one gay, one lesbian, and so on... tha's reality ind 21st century America.

                      • 17 votes
                      #6.3 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:17 PM EDT

                      boy r u wrong

                      • 4 votes
                      #6.4 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:38 PM EDT

                      REPLY: 'Midnight', any one of them would be worth 10 racist, intolerant, bigots such as yourself.

                      • 14 votes
                      #6.5 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:43 PM EDT

                      Hey midnight, just as likely that a few decades ago, the best qualified individuals were not even allowed to apply. When a Black, a Hispanic, or even an Irish guy (or girl) applied, we all know the WASP got the job dspite being deaf, dumb, and blind. Maybe you should join the rest of us in the 21st century and leave your bigoted past behind!

                      • 9 votes
                      #6.6 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:44 AM EDT

                      This reminds me of those who read a book on bricklaying and think that they are now an expert...When in reality it takes lots of practice and skill to lay brick and stone where it will stay put together.

                      The man who believes himself to be an artist because he bought a paint set.

                      The carver with his knife in one hand and a piece of wood in another....Does not make a skilled carver.

                      A man at the helm of a ships needs to have the knowledge and a GOD given talent and keenly honed skill for his position.

                      • 1 vote
                      #6.7 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:40 PM EDT

                      I was always told a captain in the army isn't the same as a captain in the navy. A navy captain is higher rank.

                      • 2 votes
                      #6.8 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:41 PM EDT

                      stc, much much higher, usually 2 + pay grades, but Captain on a vessel is called that instead of Master. That just doesn't fit into today's age. But so many are misguided here. The only boats the army pilots are very small landing craft (?). This was a sea goer and had a US Navy capt at the helm. army boys don't do anything over 3 tonnes. Peace

                      • 1 vote
                      #6.9 - Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:23 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      See. Give the army a nuclear reactor and they blow it up. Give them a boat and they run it aground. Let them stick to what they are good at, protecting us on the ground. This is a dangerous as giving a squid a grenade. LMAO.

                      • 12 votes
                      Reply#7 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:17 PM EDT

                      AFM, they do have some good pilots, so I would say they are also good at protecting us in the air

                      • 2 votes
                      #7.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:39 AM EDT

                      Yes, this young generation is real good with computer games...But don't ask them to make a judgement call.

                      You will get this blank stareeeeeeee.DAH

                        #7.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:45 PM EDT
                        Reply

                        Find a scintilla of data offered by any crackpot that might suggest that Global Climate Change isn't man-caused and its front page news.

                        The US Army and USMC have to use tax-dollars to move a whole village of Native Americans due to Global Climate Change and you can't even used the word "climate" in the article.

                        Damn liberal press.

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#8 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:24 PM EDT

                        arsenic

                        Damn liberal press.

                        They didn't want to upset the rightwing nuts. If they did, the gop would cut the funding for this project.

                        • 9 votes
                        #8.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:53 AM EDT

                        How about the fact that climate change has been happening for ever, ice ages, warming, mini ice ages, warming, glaciers forming the Great Lakes, warming. Get the picture?

                        • 4 votes
                        #8.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:35 AM EDT

                        yup the grat lakes were formd form melting ice.they were not here befor .the ice age.at least thast what the the book worm people say lol

                          #8.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:02 AM EDT

                          Hey Johhnnyy, How about the fact that this is the first time that climate change has been man made and we can actually do something about it. This pleasant climate we enjoy is called "Warm Icebox" in the 3.5 billion years of history of climate that we can interpret. Icebox is iceage. Our entire civilization is based on living on the cusp after an ice age. And you want to let that change without a fight. Get the Picture? Naw, and you never will. Idiot.

                          • 1 vote
                          #8.4 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:36 AM EDT

                          Arsenic -

                          (Good name, you seem rather poisonous).

                          This climate change is likely exacerbated by human contribution, but none of the legit science I have read inidcates that it is "man made." Most reports indicate that we are probably 6 - 7% of the cause.

                          Get the picture? Naw, and you never will because you have been thoroughly indoctrinated. BUT, I find no need to call you an idiot.

                          • 1 vote
                          #8.5 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:43 AM EDT

                          mpa

                          This climate change is likely exacerbated by human contribution

                          WOW, you are the 1st one I have seen here. That Is pretty much right on the climate change or global warming. I'm not sure of your figures, but I have never heard anyone in science say it was man made. I have heard, because of man, it's coming faster then previous times. Kudos to you.

                            #8.6 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:25 PM EDT
                            Reply

                            So this is why the Navy doesn't have Tanks; and the Army shouldn't have ships.

                            Separate missions, specialized training.

                            • 5 votes
                            Reply#9 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:29 PM EDT

                            the army has always had landing craft the Navy uses LCACS and some crafts not that many left in service. And it's called joint operations it saves money.

                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#10 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:41 PM EDT

                            didn't save money this time..by the way extra points for the great mistakes pic

                              #10.1 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:54 PM EDT

                              thats San Diego old school 1991

                              • 1 vote
                              #10.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:03 AM EDT

                              must have been nice to cruise around in boon dockers in sunny weather...froze my 6 off

                                #10.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:13 AM EDT

                                You're right Russell. I'm not sure about now, but in the late nineties at least, the Army had far more vessels (keels) than the Navy. Nothing even close in ship size of course, but in volume of bottoms in service, the Mud Munchers had a bigger navy than the Squids.

                                • 2 votes
                                #10.4 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:45 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                The boat in question is part of the Army Engineer Corps. Most people both outside and inside the Military don't realize that the Army has a sizable number of small craft and landing craft like this one to support it's combat and support operations and has had since before WWII. This is the first time I have heard of them having any problems.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#11 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:49 PM EDT

                                Negative! The Army corp. of engineers has small boats not Landing Craft Utilities (LCU)

                                  #11.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:01 AM EDT

                                  This vessel is ran by the ARMY Reserves, not the army corp. of engineers. This is not a ship but and boat that the Army runs. The Army has more boats than the Navy does. The only reason no one has heard about Army vessels is cuz nothing like this has happened before. All you people are alike and knock something because its not normal to you.

                                    #11.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:58 PM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    This spill makes it clear that we should get rid of all boats in the water....we should just swim wherever we need to go from this point foward.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#12 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:55 PM EDT

                                    Yeah, they sure can't walk...that would require faith!

                                      #12.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:48 AM EDT
                                      Reply

                                      Was it the Italian Skipppper or Gilligan at the helm?

                                      Not only are we responsible for Global Warming we've even been able to aim it at this one village.

                                      • 3 votes
                                      Reply#13 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:56 PM EDT

                                      Your village is next. Mine, next week.

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #13.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:11 AM EDT
                                      Reply

                                      1. For all those comments like Tims: maybe we should take
                                      the planes away from the Navy or cars away from the Air force? Army watercraft has been moving equipment for a long time with little incidents.

                                      2. The Navy had a chance to take over the Army's boats but dint want them. It would take too many
                                      sailors to do what one Army mariner does.

                                      3. The vessel master hit a "submerged rock" in
                                      some of the most unpredictable waters in the world. It’s not like he hit an amphibious ship (USS
                                      Hartford 2009) that sits high in the water in the middle of the day or sunk a
                                      ship of high school kids while showing off (USS Greeneville).

                                      • 5 votes
                                      Reply#14 - Sat Jun 9, 2012 11:59 PM EDT

                                      Ouch .. the Greeneville one stings ... crickets after that.

                                        #14.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:46 AM EDT

                                        I'm enjoying reading all the inter-sevice banter on this article. My thanks to all of you for your service. I grew up "army brat" - dad was career corp of engineers - you know, "the folks who hate running water?"

                                          #14.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:47 AM EDT

                                          MPA.. I have two brothers one was Army and the other Air force you should see us when we get together.

                                          Funny , thing is we all different .They really do not like swimming or the ocean and think i am crazy. Yet they have both have jump out of perfectly good Air crafts so i am sure they are , still i love them.

                                          I always tell them . Why fly?

                                            #14.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:54 AM EDT

                                            Retired Coast Guard -

                                            I know it well. Have one son-in-law who is about to finish in the Army, one who is about to undergo first deployment as Marine, and the youngest is planning on the Navy in the fall. They are tight as ticks, but brutal with the "needles." (I have a niece that is Air Force (sergeant) - nobody messes with her.)

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #14.4 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:17 PM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            I was under the impression that all the different branches of the service worked together for peace. Why are all of you from the different branches now jumping on each others cases as if you were children in elementary school? Talk about bullying!!! No wonder the US is falling apart. Even those of you in the military can't get along. Too bad. I thought you had each others backs!

                                            • 2 votes
                                            Reply#15 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:19 AM EDT

                                            relax AE, trust me when i say we have each others back, we just like to stick a jab in every now and then..it is all in good fun, every family does it

                                            • 10 votes
                                            #15.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:23 AM EDT

                                            Glad to know that. Sure sounded like you hate one another. Had me fooled.

                                              #15.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:28 AM EDT

                                              AE

                                              VH is correct. It's like the old argument about which branch of service have the smartest enlisted members. We all know it's the air force. You see, in the army. The officers send the enlisted out to get shot at. In the navy, the officers and the enlisted both go out and get shot at. In the air force, the enlisted send the officers out to get shot at.

                                              ®¿®

                                              MSGT. USAF/RET.

                                              • 7 votes
                                              #15.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:16 AM EDT

                                              by the way what happen to the old navy work unifom whats up witht he caom now

                                                #15.4 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:04 AM EDT

                                                The new camo is rediculous looking, but the uniform is very comfortable and to answer flnobody, I would say us Navy nukes got you on the smart side, but its ok, because even we lack in the social skills dept!

                                                  #15.5 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:58 AM EDT

                                                  AE, Tradition, Esprit, whatever. It's been around since Hannibal and his elephants and probably before. It means nothing and believe it or not, it's expected. Otherwise someone would think someone was pissed at someone. Like VH Navy said, when the shiit hits the fan, we have each other's backs. During slack times, it's a free for all.

                                                    #15.6 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:29 PM EDT
                                                    Reply

                                                    Just another story to give the Obamanites more reasons to kill the energy industry in the U.S. It also gives you all a reason to fight!

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    Reply#16 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:23 AM EDT

                                                    Well Odumba is fully responsible for this. He is the CIC.

                                                      #16.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:40 AM EDT

                                                      The energy industry is absolutely booming right now ... where does this paranoia come from

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #16.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:16 AM EDT

                                                      Mitchell -

                                                      Thanks for the clarifications. But, canoes are PADDLED.

                                                        #16.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 11:53 AM EDT

                                                        timlmillinois & JohnnyOnTheSpot--you two are such dingbats. Exactly WHO wants to keep us dependent on OIL? Not the Democrats nor Obama. It's your beloved filthy oil rich Republicans and CEO's. You'd blame Obama if you peed on yourselves.

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #16.4 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:24 PM EDT

                                                        Jean

                                                        You are so wrong. It was Odumbas administration that said our gas prices need to be more in line with Europe's.

                                                        It is in big businesses interests to have lower oil prices. That way the cost of producing goods would be lower and they could charge the same prices. If you think the filthily rich Republicans are getting rich off of oil you're wrong. The only ones getting rich off of oil are the people who own oil stocks an upper management, and oil companies profits are not that high if you compare them to the profit margins of other companies and most other companies don't have nearly the risk or regulations that oil has.

                                                        It should also be noted that people of your ilk think that the rich prosper off the backs of the middle class, causing the middle class to shrink. If the rich were getting rich off the middle class it would only make sense that they would want the middle class to grow.

                                                          #16.5 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 3:30 PM EDT
                                                          Reply

                                                          Yeh, 18 year olds running the ship. Great..

                                                            Reply#17 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:26 AM EDT

                                                            They are also the ones who seem to be losing their lives fighting an unnecessary war. You steer the ship and you go fight the war. See if you can do it!

                                                            • 5 votes
                                                            #17.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:31 AM EDT

                                                            World Travel07

                                                            You are correct but the thing about it is the fact that the guys driving these boats don't have to abide by the same rules as far as getting a license to drive these boats! Civilians driving commercial vessels have to go through nine kinds of hell to get a licence but government people don't have to. I am sick of our government making rules as they go along! They should have to abide by the same laws they make but they don't!

                                                            • 4 votes
                                                            #17.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:37 AM EDT

                                                            AE

                                                            I can run a boat! Give me any boat and I will take you for a ride!

                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            #17.3 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:41 AM EDT

                                                            Since when are boats 'driven'? I was under the impression that boats and ships were steered. They still need to go through training. It was a submerged rock. That's why it's called an accident! Sh!t happens!!!

                                                            • 2 votes
                                                            #17.4 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:42 AM EDT

                                                            AE

                                                            How would you say it? Steering a boat is just steering. You still have to drive the boat if you are running the throttles!

                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            #17.5 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:49 AM EDT

                                                            I stand corrected. Sorry!

                                                              #17.6 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:51 AM EDT

                                                              You are corrected again. Ships are piloted.

                                                                #17.7 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:42 AM EDT

                                                                hmm...piloted or helmed for larger motorized ships, sailed or steered for sail/mast powered vessels (helmed is fine for larger sailing vessels and is preferred in some circles), steered for smaller motorized boats and personal craft like jet skis, oared for self powered boats/canoes and such like.

                                                                But no "drive" anywhere, except for snowmobiles being used like wave runners at the local pond (though you'd most likely use the term "ride" instead). ;-)

                                                                Or some odd thing like that. :-)

                                                                Mitchell

                                                                • 2 votes
                                                                #17.8 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:46 AM EDT

                                                                Sorry to break it to you, but the Army has the same if not more stringent training and licensing then the civilian world. Army Vessel Masters go through over nine months of Coast Guard approved schooling to get their endorsement. The same endorsement they can take to the Coast Guard office to get equated to a civilian license if desired.

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                #17.9 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:26 AM EDT
                                                                Reply

                                                                I Can see that the Oil Boom looks to be working out good, half of all the fuel is floating right past it.

                                                                • 2 votes
                                                                Reply#18 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:35 AM EDT

                                                                Mr. Maeweather, if 1991 is old school , where does that leave 1975? Oh and VHNavy, airedales have never been known for walking upright

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                Reply#19 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:37 AM EDT

                                                                Carl, "1975" is in the history books. 8)

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                Reply#20 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:45 AM EDT

                                                                Thanks, timlmillinois, but I'll pass. I'll let you 'run' all the boats you please. Just watch out for submerged rocks!

                                                                  Reply#21 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:49 AM EDT

                                                                  A E--timimillinois wouldn't know what a submerged rock is..........

                                                                    #21.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:25 PM EDT
                                                                    Reply

                                                                    Rick I sure am glad somebody wrote it down, as I forgot to

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    Reply#22 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:49 AM EDT

                                                                    this happens more than it should,the only time you hear about it if it's a oil company,military.Lots of beached ships with crushed hulls,all the oil leaked out,not even a mention.Everyone needs to be accountable,people put safety last when it comes down to the all mighty dollar.

                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                    Reply#23 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:52 AM EDT

                                                                    Are boats steered or driven?

                                                                    FYI:

                                                                    Answer:

                                                                    I would say its not a huge deal to say either. I have heard many a ship/boat operators, Masters, Commanding Officers, Skippers and whatnot refer to themselves affectionately as a "Ship driver" or a "Boat driver". I am sure there are more than a few "old salts" out there, who by the very grumpy nature, would object. Also IMHO steering or acting as a helmsman is only one part of the operation. Driving the boat would be all of the things you need to know, such as navigation, rules of the road, stability and so on.

                                                                    I guess I am one of those Grumpy old salts. A traditionalist would say that the word drive when used in a nautical context has a bad connotation, generally meaning out of control, as in "driven ashore", the current drove it down the river", "driven by the wind" and so on. The propulsion system is also often referred to as "the drive". I do not like the word drive when used about boats because it implies that it is as easy as driving a car. Traditional language uses steered, or at the helm (as in he was at the helm), at the wheel or tiller, or in regard to sailboats, "sailed". Most Nautical dictionaries do not even have the word drive in them in this context. Frankly, among people who have a lot of experience with boats, using the word drive to mean in control of the boat, reveals that you are a novice. If you don't care about that then it doesn't matter. We all learn by experience. I would suggest getting a copy of Chapman's Piloting Seamanship and Small Boat Handling if you want to learn as much as you can about boating.

                                                                    However, with the huge growth in popularity of boating, the word drive has become more common, mainly because new boat owners didn't learn the vernacular. The word drive has been picked up by the media and most mainstream boating publications now use it. So it's your choice.

                                                                    Read more: #ixzz1xMaS5iHN

                                                                      Reply#24 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:58 AM EDT

                                                                      AE

                                                                      I like your answer to the question of "Steering or Driving". I really didn't know that it was that big of an issue with you. Back in the day when the engineer controlled the throttles from the engine room, the Captain steered the boat. Now the Pilot or Captain drive the boat because that individual is in complete control of the boat due to the fact that the person at the helm is in complete control of the throttles and the steering. You can use terms as "Underway" or "Sailing" but you wouldn't be sailing in a motorized vessel even though I know a lot of sail boats that have motors.

                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      #24.1 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:28 AM EDT

                                                                      Only one comment about your interesting and informative post: Conning a ship isn't easy, to be sure, but neither is driving a car. Loss of life in auto accidents dwarfs all other causes of death in the U.S., and most accidents are caused by folks who assumed they knew how to drive, but clearly didn't. Worse yet, many bad drivers know how bad they are, but don't give a damn, until they see a Crown Vic in the rear view mirror.

                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      #24.2 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:38 AM EDT
                                                                      Reply

                                                                      Army...at sea? Need this come as a suprise?

                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                      Reply#25 - Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:16 AM EDT
                                                                      Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                                                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.