
Abby Drey / Centre Daily Times via AP
Joe Amendola, left, attorney for Jerry Sandusky, loads boxes of files into his car after the trial adjourned Thursday.
ANALYSIS
At the end of the first week of Jerry Sandusky’s sex abuse trial, the prosecution's case is nearly done. The defense case will begin Monday. For a number of reasons, the defense has a very difficult task in overcoming the evidence presented.
No one thought the prosecution's case was weak going into this trial and it wasn't. There were eight witnesses who claimed that Sandusky had inappropriate contact with them -- from bizarre hugging in the Penn State showers to much more serious and disturbing conduct. There were two independent witnesses: Mike McQueary, the then-graduate assistant football coach who said he saw Sandusky in the shower with a boy, and the janitor whose colleague allegedly said he saw Sandusky performing oral sex on a boy in the shower. And then there were Sandusky's own words in letters to one of his accusers and a bizarre contract with one of the alleged victims calling on him to pay the boy to spend time with Sandusky.
After witnesses testified that Jerry Sandusky molested them, lawyers for the former Penn State assistant football coach will begin presenting their case to jurors on Monday. NBC's John Yang reports.
So far during this trial, however, Joe Amendola has done a very good job representing his client.
A lawyer is only as good as his case and this was a case that had to go to trial. The state could not offer Sandusky anything short of an effective life sentence. If convicted of just one of the most serious offenses against even one of the victims, Sandusky must serve a minimum of 10 years, with a possible maximum of 40. There are six victims for whom offenses carrying 10-year mandatory minimums are charged. Then there are a variety of other charges. No doubt if convicted of all the offenses, the judge will order some of the sentences to run concurrently, but theoretically Sandusky could be ordered to serve more than 500 years. The state could not have make an offer that would be anything less than a life sentence. Amendola had to go to trial, regardless of the strength of the prosecution's case.
Full coverage of the Jerry Sandusky trial
But Amendola's case is not that strong. And he had a difficult task of cross-examining victims who allege molestation. Throughout the trial, he did a wonderful job of confronting the alleged victims with problems with their testimony without alienating the jury by attacking them. This is a difficult tight rope to walk and he did so admirably.
He also exposed some real problems with some of their testimony.
Most of the victims have changed their story -- some of them since their grand jury testimony, which was made public in November. Some of the victims continued to have friendly relationships with Sandusky as adults, years after the alleged abuse. A number of them testified that they remembered new details, or changed their view of Sandusky, only upon reflection or after counseling. One testified he became angry with Sandusky for the first time when Sandusky cut off contact with him. Finally, Amendola did a very nice job in demonstrating that physical evidence corroborating the final victim's story was missing and that this victim claimed to have been the only boy at Sandusky's house during a period when other alleged victims also claimed to have been there.
These problems with the victims' testimony, well-developed by the defense, will likely not be enough to overcome the prosecution's case. The number of victims, the independent witnesses, and the defendant's own words appear to make anything other than a conviction on a number of these counts a very remote possibility.
More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:
- 4 climbers presumed dead in Mount McKinley avalanche
- Woman drives car into street party, up to 30 hurt
- Video: Tourist is a hero two days in a row
- Obama order poses dilemma for eligible illegal immigrants
- Sex case: Jehovah's Witnesses must pay $20 million
Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook


Will Penn State be called "Pedo State" henceforth?
Nitpickin Lyins
Oh yes, that scum bag is abnormal alright. Cut his nuts off and waste him.
I can't believe this guy wasn't killed already.
It's the same old defense ... he didn't do it ...
AND THEN ... after dragging victims through the mud ... again!
He's crazy and couldn't help himself ...........
will sandusky be training them... to bath ... at state penn...
Tough task, wow, what a understatement; the defense must prove to the jury that for over 20 years, he was really controlled by a alternate personality that compelled him to act out his fantasy's; all the defense wants to do now , is end this massacre as soon as possible; i expect them to offer a plea, if the State would accept it, which i doubt they will.(the only reason to accept a plea would be to end the endless appeals that will follow, and save money).
How about taking a plea you piece of s**t, dragging the victums into court was shameful and disgusting ! maybe he will slip in the shower and fall on a razor and bleed to death !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Did you read the analysis piece? The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's case is so strong that any deal that they could have realistically offered would be for at least as long as any realistic remaining lifespan, so there was really no deal to make, no "bargain" for pleading out, and how likely is it that someone this narcissistic could bring himself to admit guilt and "elocute" anyway?
@ Post #1 Leroy. I am not from PA but can say this has nothing to do with the good people that live there. I also think Penn State is a great college but you have to ask why administrators there let this POS loose for so long when so many knew. Big, Big dollar payouts will drain their finances with Punitive damages not covered by insurance.
Sandusky has no plea and will certainly be found guilty. I only hope a guard in prison takes a long break while he gets raped over and over...........
My point about the plea was for the benefit of the victims, NOT SANDUSKY ! he can kill himself for all I care,
He has ruined lives of countless young men (that we know of) and penn state !
I reiterate my point: why would anyone this narcissistic do anything to benefit his victims, when he tells himself that he really didn't do anything wrong and that he cared about them so much and now they are just out to get him because someone has planted in their minds that they can get some more of his money? Look, I think this guy is a serious sicko, but not "sick" in the sense of being so mentally defective as not to be criminally culpable for his actions.
why would anyone think he would be bothered by being raped in prison- for all i know he may be looking forward to it!!
I like this photo of Amendola. What a clown he looks like. Amendola deserves a Pulitzer Prize for discovering (inventing) the first case of Histrionic Personality Disorder in which a person (Sandusky) only acts in an over the top way with young boys from poor, troubled families. In the Amendola variety, you don't soap up Joe Paterno or PSU players in the showers to get attention. You only tickle and massage young boys. When you look at how far Sandusky claims to have gone with boys (lying on top of them, giving presents, showering)...he could have at least taken a few girls to athletic events, given them a few presents. He could have skipped showering with them and he would have gotten lots of love from girls without doing anything suspicious or wrong. Send Slimedusky and his fool lawyer to prison, together.
Your last name is misspelled. It should start with a "T". The attorney is participating in the justice system. Everybody is supposed to have a defense attorney that does his very best to defend the accused even if the attorney thinks he is guilty. When we start sending people to prison for what they are accused of and not for what they are convicted of I hope you will be the first one unjustly accused and I hope they put you in Sandusky's cell. He is a pretty big guy and in pretty fair shape. I'll bet he will need comfort and you will give it to him. Your new name will be Mary.
Defense attorneys are slimy liars, they will throw any lie out there and not have to produce an ounce of proof. They will blame a victim when they are standing beside the most evil person knowing full well their client is guilty. I've seen lawyers rubbing the back and caressing the arms of people who have raped and murdered and act like their client is just misunderstood. They will try to get the most perverted scum to walk the street making excuses like his mama didn't hug him enough, daddy left, he was bullied, ADHD, hit his head or any other nonsense they can make up. They are as low a human being as their client and it seems this joker is just like his creepy client, all of a sudden when things are not looking too good let's claim a stupid defense of some mental disorder that I'll bet his nasty family didn't even know he had, well dream up another one.
Amendola looks like a creepy pedophile too. I bet they both get off talking about what Jerry did to them little boys.
123...What does a pedophile look like, exactly? A father, brother, friend, teacher, coach--they look like any average Joe citizen. To imply that his attorney is a pedophile without any evidence to support that contention, is not only without merit, it is just wrong--and slanderous. All those hoping that Sandusky will get raped repeatedly in prison or hope for it are very likely wrong also. The ones that get raped are the inmates that least deserve it--generally they are of slight build, first time offenders, not affiliated with any gangs, are in for non violent offenses and are celled with long timers. Rape is wrong no matter who it happens to. I'm not defending Sandusky--he is a narcissistic sociopath IMHO. Still, his punishment should be to lose his freedom for the rest of his life--never allowed to abuse another child. He is a coward and will likely PC up as soon as he hits the door. You will never convince me that rape is a solution to anything...ever. The point is to keep him from harming more children and to punish him by taking away his freedom and control...and he will have very little control over his daily life in prison.
His lawyer is legally bound to offer a vigorous defense--no matter if it is Amendola or a court appointed attorney. I believe that they have made some questionable decisions that have made a successful outcome on his part very unlikely. Have you people that are out for vengence against the lawyers ever considered that they may be crazy like a fox? They are riding a fine line between offering a vigorous defense and having the case overturned for "ineffective counsel." Would you p!ss off a jury by bringing up a histrionic defense when it opens the prosecution up to being allowed to have their experts examine him and testify that he is a narcissistic sociopath with no conscience? They have made some calls that that make me believe these defense attorneys have children and don't want their client back on the streets either. But, their hands are tied in some way--they have to present, at least, a very good appearance of competency in order to avoid that "ineffective counsel" ruling so often seen in appellate courts. Wait and see what happens before judging too harshly. Sometimes our justice system does work. Think strategy.
Actually, Amendola is a pedophile.
He impregnated a 16-year-old female client of his. He was 49 years old at the time. They ended up marrying in 2003, but have since divorced. They have two children together.
Public record. Look it up.
Birds of a feather, flock together.
Pedophiles are attracted to pre-pubescent children. Unless he started her several years earlier, I wouldn't say 16 qualifies, though it's still disgusting in my opinion. I haven't read anything about the age of consent in her state at the time, so it may or may not have been legal, even if it was consenting. Not supporting him, just wanted to clarify the definition because that word gets thrown around on these forums all the time and I don't think everyone truly understands the definition.
gramgigi; it appears you are not a American citizen; if you were, you would have learned in grammar school civics; that the Constitution of the United States Article 6, states that a person charged with a crime, felony, must have legal counsel, that legal counsel must defend that person with the best defense he /she has the ability to raise; failure to do so will result in a reversal of any guilty verdict; that is the American way, in your country it is probably different; that is why we have been the envy of the world for all these years.
Saxon; American citizen or not, I think gramgigi was just stating what they have seen and how (no matter how Constitutionally Correct it might be) it is disgusting at times to watch. I am an American citizen, I did have civics in school and I have to agree with gramgigi it can be stomach turning to see. I get it. I know it is that way, and it has to be that way. But it doesn't make it any easier to witness. As far as America being the envy of others is quickly losing ground as well. Without bringing race, religion and/or politics into the discussion, we are headed down a sinkhole at an ever increasing rate of speed. I'm not sure anyone, at this point, can even stop it.
geo-305...: yep i agree, democracy is the hardest form of government; however our collapse(which is eminent) was caused by our sleeves, letting our elected leaders being influenced by the world wide banking, oil cartels; our collapse started in 1913, with the passage of the private banking act (aka federal reserve act); it is a wonder it has taken 100 years; but the end is around the corner, it will be interesting how historians view our inability to see how we sat back and allowed the banking cartels to take over, and collapse the greatest experiment in history.
geo- why not bring race, religion, and politics into the discussion- they are the reason this country will fragment and fall apart eventually. they all do sooner or later. we've had a good run, but the next centuries will be asian or indian. learn to speak chinese everyone!
Are you SERIOUS that lawyer is a pervert too? Dear God, HOW is it that he didnt lose his law license and wind up in the pokey? GROSS GROSS GROSS!
The defense faces a rough task. NO KIDDING, REALLY you don't say? If they raise this idiotic defense of mental illness so he what couldn't help himself???? You have got to be kidding me. This guy has a MOUNTAIN of evidence the size of Everest against him. This case is air tight. The question remains is Penn State sympathy going to play a role? Answer: a RESOUNDING NO .. IT IS NOT nor SHOULD it. This is EXACTLY what so many in this country are furious about both on the left AND on the right. It is the putridness and lack of faith those of us who obey the law and do the right thing but our institutions do not. It is a lack of faith of those of us who do not have the benefit of being born lucky, smart, athletic, or rich. Who when these institutions flout the law kick excrement in our face. It happens on the university level and it happens on Wall Street and in Washington they because of their putrid MONEY get away with literally murder. This guy RUINED lives as IF he murdered them and if he gets out of this because of sympathy for an institution or his so called mental illness I will SPIT!
The Catholic Church has the very same problem. And they want to know why people are turning away from this corrupt pedophile infused church with its corrupt pope? Are they kidding? If I were Catholic NEVER would I send my kid to be with a priest alone, NEVER would I join a church that I was not 150% absolutely sure my kid would not be touched. I would sue them nine ways to Sunday if anything happened after the NERVE of that corrupt institution doing the shameful thing it did and that was cover up sex abuse of children. What could be worse? Penn State did the same thing: COVER UP and they should go to jail!
Our institutions are dying and to put in place in this country a guy who is a member of the 1% and think he will understand the aggrieved 99% is INSANITY .... people hate their institutions and love them at the same time. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over thinking you will get a different result. YOU WON'T!
I would assume that the Catholic Church is watching this case closely, but since the Church seems so out of touch on most social issues, I'm not that confident they are. Then again, maybe they are so secretly brilliant that they wish to see the Catholic Church dissolve totally after this generation of dinosaur leadership, that never in the future of mankind again will institutions such as theirs be viable. The Catholics, recently the Jehova's Witness scandal, and a few other's like this Sandusky case, it makes one wonder if the next generation won't have parents taking their children to a biker bar on Sunday morning to drink beer and swear...where the kids are safe!
Be a lot safer than with a priest, a biker has more morals than molesting a little boy.
Interesting...where are the trolls who come out in droves with their racist bile when the article is about black on white crime or black on black crime. But here you a a piece of @!$%# (white) pedophile molesting innocent white children....and all I hear is tumbleweeds blowing in the forum.
Well, I'm admittedly very predjudiced against rapist perverts, regardless of the race or sex of their victims.
Outrider, maybe you should put the other oar in the water. Black on black is racist? What you hear is a tumblebug you have for a brain.
Defense lawyers defend scumbags and criminals and they defend the innocent when the government accuses them of something they did not do. We have to bear seeing and hearing from the lawyers defending the criminals ONLY because one day we may have to use them to defend us against wrong accusations. There are many innocent men and women in jail because the jury thought defense lawyers defend criminals and the prosecution only has criminals to prosecute. I see five different doctors every month and I will deal with 50 more than deal with one lawyer. May God protect us all from criminals and lawyers.
Santa:
You are correct. Everyone has a right to present a defense, and everyone deserves the presumption of innocence in court, for sometimes criminal defense attorneys are defending totally innocent people, and sometimes they are defending people who are in fact criminals but not guilty of the offense with which they are charged. Even with all of these safeguards, we both know that sometimes innocent people are nonetheless incarcerated, even executed.
However, I'd pretty much bet my life that Jerry Sandusky is not truly innocent; when your best defense is "I'm a histrionic personality and because of that I like to hug and soap up little boys in showers," you're not really innocent.
Too bad they don't do hangings anymore.
Histronic Personality Disorder? BS! This monster has a Hedonistic Personality Desire to rape young boys and vulnerable adolescents for the sheer pleasure and power of it. Why is free on bail?
I wish somehow an irate father locates the out on bail, Sandusky, in a dark alley.
I don't, Dasvet. The father will be prosecuted and rot in jail and his son will feel even more horrible that his father is in jail. He isn't worth going to prison for, you know?
What I find scary is that this tactic may open a whole new can of worms for other pervs to use in their defense when they get caught; this is a slippery slope.
Elizabeth...Read the comments on this vine. Don't you think that the jury is going to be a bit put out by this histrionic cr@p. If I was a juror, I would find it irrelevant and just a side note. I have listened to many men that have been raped in prison and let me tell you--they did not deserve it and it wasn't part of the deal. They were willing to do their time over the drugs they had stashed. Be careful what you wish for because it doesn't usually happen to the right person. They have child killers, murderers, pedophiles, serial killers in prisons. They also have frauds, MJ distributors, thieves etc. sharing the same space because of budget cuts. Then there is the PC group...most of whom are sex offenders. They are not the ones that get taken out unless they get some status for it. They are separated from GP. Yes, it happens, but it doesn't always happen to the right person and when it does, the perp, is in for life (the one that commits the rape). Generally, if they are in GP, they are short timers in minimum security facilities and are harrassed endlessly, but rarely raped because the other inmates don't want to do anything to interfere with their release. Lots of assaults...but few rapes. Besides..who the hell would want to have sex with Sandusky? Inmates have their standards as well. This post is just a FYI. No offense intended. Just something to think about...or not...as you choose.
Davset...An then the child of the irate father would be fatherless. How is that ok? Another troubled child is not what this world with pedophiles in it needs. Let the fathers stay home and teach, guide, and protect their children.
You have a point, but my main wish is this scum doesn't remain breathing. If I was on a jury, the father who did away with Sandusky, would never be convicted.
Dasvet...Understandable reaction...I think your children deserve to have a father like you to protect them and keep them safe from the likes of this scum sucking twit.
Anyone who knows anything about needy kids from troubled family environments understands why they do not testify as if reading from a script. . . .verbatim every time.
Those same causative factors are why some continue to have contact with Sandusky. I have not had the stomach to read every word about this trial but I think it's safe to assume few, if any, of his victims have had intervention or treatment for their traumas.
These kids have PTSD. They cannot be expected to think or behave like men their age who have not experience the same traumas
jk...You have an excellent point!! They have been ingrained with the feeling that they "owe" Sandusky for all the favors he has done for them and then there is the guilt. Inside, they believe that they are partly responsible for their victimization--which is not true--but they can't shake that feeling. The men that have told me they have been raped have repeatedly said the same thing: "I should have died before I allowed that to happen to me." Good post and good intuitive skills.
He is going to plead Insanity? That is always how they get out of gay allegations. Sandusky did what he did and was not insane just stupid and a gay pedaphile. Most gays are not Pedophiles. He tried to be gay with males he could intimadate. He is not gay. He is a criminal. Let us not forget Harvey Milk and how his murderer got off on a Twinkie defense. It is time we face these people for what they are. No excuses.
Umm...your post is so rambling and contradictory that I'm not sure what you were trying to say. No, there is no reason to think he's gay and this has nothing to do with gays.
Rape and pederatsty are about the assertion of power. They are about using sex to assert power. This usually is the case with statutory rape where the victim is too young to give real consent. This man was on a serious power trip, and these boys, now young men, were used to gratify his own massive ego. My primary interest in this is about his "charity". I wonder whether he set it up to meet young boys with evil intent, or whether he met so many through it and found out that some would do almost anything to please a grown man who would pay real attention to them, especially one who could help them meet their sports heroes and take them places, and found this to be a temptation that he could not or would not resist. I also wonder about his own childhood and if he was originally a victim as all too often one generation's victims become the perpetrators of the next.
jers...No he is not going to plead insanity. He can't. It would have been stated at the beginning at the start of the trial.
He's goin' down. Too bad he had to cause so much destruction in so many young lives before he was brought to justice. All these young men need to sue and own any property belonging to this creep (and his wife.)
I say destroy Sandusky with extreme prejudice.
Sounds to me like everybody but Sandusky himself is acknowledging the fact that he is guilty.
Yes, as a matter of his constitutional rights he's entitled to a sound defense, however, once he is judged guilty he should be immediately remanded into custody and never allowed to see the light of day as a free man from that instant forward, for the rest of his existence. Actually, I prefer the death sentence for such perps as he, but I think this whole thing is going to hurt him, and he's old enough that he should die off relatively quickly. I still think they ought to be looking at Penn under a microscope, and the wife, too.
Stay strong guys; that light at the end of the tunnel doesn't appear to be a train...
The death sentence for rape and child molestation has been suggested before but clearer heads prevailed. If you are going to sentence someone to death for such crimes it is in the criminals best interest for them to kill the victim so thay can't testify. So instead of a live victim you have a dead victim. He will be put in protective custody and live out his sorry life behind bars.
it would be nice if Cleland would allow the prosecution to bring in "expert testimony" re: the effects of child sex abuse on survivors. that would help clear up most if not all of the supposed "inconsistencies"
Great post Elizabeth. You clearly have the intelligence to "get it."
Gary,
I agree, but I wonder if the defense does try to make that argument, if the prosecution would then be able to counter that with an expert to explain why it is common with abuse victims. That may be allowed in rebuttal, though it wasn't on their initial presentation.
Sanddusky needs his penis and both hands cut off and all his wealth given to his victoms.
I hope all his money goes to his victims and the wife will relive all the times she treasured her country club lifestyle instead of turning in her pervert husband while she loses everything.
Jim: If you asked him I think he would think that cutting of his hands and penis is his wealth. His victims do deserve compensation...but cutting off people's body parts is not what we, as Americans, are all about. I understand the anger...just not the solution you offered.
I haven't seen anyone comment on the faulty memories of the victims and other witnesses. If they can't remember which event happened before another one, or how many people were there, it isn't because they are lying; it's because they are normal people. When these ugly things happened, those involved probably just wanted to forget it and go on with their lives. So they didn't document when/where something happened, who was there, what was said. They just have a memory of the experience but not the details. We're all like that. It would be a sad thing if their inaccurate memories keep them from being vindicated and justice being served.
Annette...Very good point. That they don't always get is perfect or right everytime gives them more credibility in my mind than if they sounded scripted. It sounds like it came from the soul and not coached. I can't remember every date and time I was with a certain person--sometimes not even the right year. I agree totally with your assessment. I hope the jury sees that as well. It is also very easily to get confused when on the stand...very stressful. It took me a minute to remember my credentials when asked when I testified for the first time. Never really got easier. Good post.
Wes Oliver - the Siskell and Ebert of attorney appraisal: is the first article you've ever written? Do you know what the phrase "proof read" means? You get a Failing grade for word choice and syntax - and you're a law professor?
The world has become a seriously F--ked up place to live. On line journalism is as big a travesty as Sandusky's behavior.
SoCalMoFo...........the last line of your post very definitely reveals your ignorance. It will be a cold day in HELL when a little bad journalism is as big a travesty as the sexual abuse of innocent, young children! You are an idiot.
Sandusky for president of Boy Scouts, he cannot help the way he is just like all homosexuals he was born that way and just like little boys. Barney Frank and the pro gay potus will try to get him off
Oh they will? Proof of that claim or are you just a right wing troll? Sandusky and Pedoterno were registered GOP voters: their voter ID cards are online.
winston...Were you born in a sewer? Homosexuals all over the world will condemn Sandusky's behavior. It puts them in a bad light and they hate to see children harmed just as do heterosexuals. Do some reading. Open your mind. Learn to appreciate differences rather than expect sameness around you. Diversity is what makes America a great country and you are part of that diversity....You are so wrong...and your lack of wisdom could harm a child that is confused about their sexuality. Do you think more children need to be harmed? I think that has gone on long enough. How about it? Slow down and enjoy the world around you and all the colors and cultures...and realize that you are part of that beauty.
What's going on in Centre, Co., PA? Sexually promiscuous lawyer, coaches, DA disappears in 2005, admin elites kept of file yet did nothing... Never move there.
No more than that is going on in Florida or other states.
Watch your children and your animals when homosexuals/pedophiles/ bestiality folks are around. GAY; Got Aids Yet
winston...Hemophiliac child: Got AIDS Yet? Homosexuality doesn't have a d@mn thing to do with Sandusky. You are off topic and your ignorance on the subject is truely awesome in its scope. Winston....go back to your Mom's basement and play video games and p!ss in bottles like you have been. It is hard to keep up with the real world, science, and new ideas when you have spent so much time shampooing your hair in the toilet. When you are ready to grow up, take a shower and include your mouth, brain, and ears when you wash and join the real world.
The lawyers for the defendants in the Nuremberg Trials also had a difficult time getting their clients off.
Yes, innocent until proven OF COURSE. Innocent men are convicted all the time. That is tragic BUT for the purposes of blogs here one can say and think anything one wants as long as one is not on the jury or involved in the trial in any way. This is elementary First Amendment. Here's MY verdict -- GUILTY beyond a shadow of a doubt. Sentence: LIFE TIMES TWO! If it were possible to give him a cruel and unusual punishment I would do that.
These excuses for humanity who do that to an innocent child, these institutions that safeguard perpetrators, these governments and Wall Street BILLIONAIRES that screw the innocent of their money without facing punishment and then have to nerve to take a pass with OUR money and give themselves bonuses yet --- They ALL deserve a place in hell. If there is a God and no one wants one more than I, I hope he keeps the fires burning for the lot of them and that includes Mr. Romney and his henchman, Geithner, Bernanke, Summers Rubin, Dimon who sits on the Fed and polices himself and those basT*&^ Senators who practically gave Dimon a kiss before the Senate Banking "Committee" those mostly Republicans but some Democrats who are being paid off by JP Morgan and the big banks so the committee slobbered all over this guilty as sin crime bankster syndicate?
It's all related even though this is about Sandusky it is about ALL of our institutions which were created SUPPOSEDLY for us but are teeming and riddled with corruption from the Congress to the courts (ESPECIALLY the Supreme Court -- shame on them for sure), to the banks, to the universities, to the to the Catholic Church for god sake -- God if there is one must be weeping for all the innocents brutalized by systems that care NOTHING for the people that created them. It is SICKENING. Wars that are phony and make money for private enterprise with gifts of contracts that allow them to do shoddy work accountable to no one, wars that kill thousands for NOTHING, that invade countries for NOTHING, that go around the world like a strutting peacocks inflaming humanity, that allow a gorgeous earth to be smothered by oil that is making it vomit, an earth laden with man made pollution killing innocent children..our children giving us cancer...wait watch the cancer statistics especially from Fukishma but from fracing, from drilling for oil that one day will NOT be there. Get Robert Greenwald's the Koch Brothers documentary and see what sins they have committed. They have committed GREAT sins against the earth and against humanity and have waged war on our very democracy itself. But not only them -- read about them all. Horrible just horrible.
So far off topic, Rosen, that I imagine that you are talking about Jupiter or Saturn. Come on!!! Leave politics out of this...It is getting soooo booorrring for every thread to insult our President or go on a political rant. "Like a strutting peacock inflaming humanity?" Seriously? wow....
I did not say ONE thing about the president. He is the best we have. He's tied by a corrupt Congress. Read Chris Hayes's book 'Twilight of the Elites" he is if I understand the synopsis or discussion of his book on his show was discussing nearly all the things I mention but the main point is we the majority of the people who have been so sad and SO discouraged by the failure of ALL of our institutions whether the university, the church, government, etc. being BOUGHT, SOLD right from underneath us. Sandusky and those who looked the other way are symptoms of the LARGEST issue. "Twilight of the Elites" I want to get that book and read it as my anger is reserved for ALL of it. I feel powerless in the soup of HUGE HUGE HUGE money machine with which I can never compete. The true guilty ones get off but we the 99% are left holding a bag of air while they have a great time like Romney with his multi million buck houses, his worth of $250 MILLION bucks and his elevator for all his cars. IS THIS WHAT THE PEOPLE WANT?? How could they. Will HE reform the banks? NEVER but those who support him somehow think with hard work they can be like him -- THEY CAN'T. As George Carlin said: "IT's a CLUB and you ain't in it" Utube his "American Dream" and that is EXACTLY how I feel. Yes, what I said is a rant BUT it relates to the subject at hand except I do think Sandusky is going to jail where SO many others should be but will NEVER be. They will just keep arresting people mostly of color for pot and fill the privatized jails with many who should not be there!
Here is an overview of Chris Hayes's book: "Twighlight of the Elites" That is what my previous rant is in part about. I quote: "Over the past decade, Americans watched in bafflement and rage as one institution after another – from Wall Street to Congress, the Catholic Church to corporate America, even Major League Baseball – imploded under the weight of corruption and incompetence. In the wake of the Fail Decade, Americans have historically low levels of trust in their institutions; the social contract between ordinary citizens and elites lies in tatters.
How did we get here? With Twilight of the Elites, Christopher Hayes offers a radically novel answer. Since the 1960s, as the meritocracy elevated a more diverse group of men and women into power, they learned to embrace the accelerating inequality that had placed them near the very top. Their ascension heightened social distance and spawned a new American elite--one more prone to failure and corruption than any that came before it."
and it goes on to say and I quote: "Mixing deft political analysis, timely social commentary, and deep historical understanding, Twilight of the Elites describes how the society we have come to inhabit – utterly forgiving at the top and relentlessly punitive at the bottom – produces leaders who are out of touch with the people they have been trusted to govern. Hayes argues that the public's failure to trust the federal government, corporate America, and the media has led to a crisis of authority that threatens to engulf not just our politics but our day-to-day lives.
I agree with it all and my rants not well written but done so at midnight, tired very tired but having such fuming rage about it all and powerless to do anything about it. Just on the dawn of perahps electing a man who will simply perpetuate it all. Mitt Romney is not about MOST of us and never will be. He cannot even accept a cookie from people who are like most of us. He is uncomfortable, nervous in his own skin. He is saying because he has to often things his father NEVER believed. He is just another who will provide a BIGGER ... MUCH bigger hole into which our nation will sink! Is the president perfect? NO but when was a nation ever perfect? Answer: Never and Romney will give us more of George W. Bush except on steroids IF he wants to keep the money of those who are getting him there! All i am saying is do NOT be duped by anyone. Money is the root of all evil the wise men said but in this country it is the very basis of what our country has become. Sad for most of us.
Upending well-worn ideological and partisan categories, Hayes entirely reorients our perspective on our times. Twilight of the Elites is the defining work of social criticism for the post-bailout age."
Gentlemen and women of the jury I'm here to show your that my client, Mr. Sandusky, is completely innocent of the charges put against him here at this court. In fact, he is the victim of these young men who over a period of time willfully and persistently pressed their mouths and anuses against his penis despite his efforts to ward off their lewd advances against his will.
First and foremost, most pedophiles are not homosexuals. Just because Sandusky sexually assaulted boys doesn't make him a homosexual. He had easier access to boys than he did to girls. After all, he couldn't spend so much time in the basement and hotel rooms with girls. When he gets to prison, he will have to be protected from the general population. His victims couldn't remember exact dates etc. because they were so traumatized they blocked out most of what happened. Unless you were abused, you cannot imagine what a child will do. Hang him hi!
Berry....It doesn't mean he is a homosexual...maybe bi, but he, clearly, preferred boys over girls. It is a preference that is about having power over these boys. Generally, peds don't cross preference or race lines, but there are many exceptions.
The last victim that testified said Sandusky never performed oral to him. An expert pointed out that was likely because this young man was a few years older than the others and therefore past puberty, so Sandusky wasn't wanting to be reminded of that. It was an interesting observation and leads to more evidence that he truly did fit the definition of pedophile, with it's pathology.
Not that I'm an expert, but from everything I've read and heard from experts, it clearly seems to be a situation of who they can easiest get access to. It's often in their own family that abuse occurs. In that context, it would be easier to have access to girls than it would for girls in a non-family setting, where being around them that much would gain suspicion much more readily.
If the family situation isn't there, it would seem to be easier for a pedophile to access children in a non-family situation through boys. This could be through sports, mentoring, etc and not bring nearly the amount of suspicion. There isn't any indication that Sandusky has had any relationships or interactions with adult men, so there is no basis to assume he is gay or bi, as that is about adult attraction.
It is interesting how people choose to believe that a pedophile who preys on little boys is a homosexual. All of them seem to feel that having the same genatilia is the indicator. Next time you're around kids...take a look at the physical differences between a 10 yr old boy and a 10 yr old girl. Other than hair length in some cases, you won't find many differences. A young boy isn't muscle bound...but he does have similarities to a female.
It has also been noted that pedophiles who choose boys, do so because they see themselves.
I agree Jed, that it was easier for Sandusky to assault boys. MUCH easier to explain away than being around little girls.
what about his wife ....she must have known ......But Chose to close her eyes and ears ....What do you think
jude...I think that there is not enough evidence to support charges of conspiracy to commit child abuse or to support obstruction of justice. There has to be probable cause and I just don't see where they are going to find it. Do I believe that she knew or suspected? Yup, I do. Do I believe that it can be proven? Nope. I don''t. However, social censure and street justice is a bitch...especially when you have been used to being put on a pedestal for years. She will walk a lonely road with a lot of potholes....
Unfortunately, there are a good number of women out there who really didn't have a clue about their spouses pedophile tendancies or actions. Those women choose to believe that the man they chose to love and marry could not do the things people are saying. Those women have heard every 'reasonable' explanation. They choose to ignore that little voice in the back of their mind telling them that something IS wrong.
The pedophile explains that 'so and so' is having difficulties at school, home and wanted to talk into the wee hours of the morning. The pedophile explains that 'so and so' called and sounded distressed so he is going to take him for a workout. Upon arriving home, the workout went great - we worked up quite a sweat and showered.
See, everything is explained...in detail...just not ALL of the details.
Dude rocker is going to get up on the stand, and totally collapse, hysterically sobbing about how he didn't 'know' he was hurting anyone, and they're going to haul him off to a state hospital... soon to be transfered to a cush private hospital, where Dottie and friends can visit...
It's how the 1% do it....