true...u are so right. people in america should be prosecuted for 1st degree murder based on what you think is "creepy lookin"!

that's what america is all about! charge anyone who "looks creepy".

He sure looks cocky in that photo. I think by the arrogant looks he has that he is guilty! String him up and make him watch the Oprah Network the rest of his life.

true, anyone jason thinks looks guilty and "cocky" should be murdered.

thanks for sharing, jase.

@ian---doesn't cmt751 has a right to think he is creepy looking (or ugly or handsome or young or old) just as you have a right to your opinions? The post didn't say anything about guilt or innocence at all, just a comment on his appearance. So what?

I bet when he gets convicted (and he will), "Bubba" will wipe that cocky grin off his face.

Cops generally don't do well in prison, much less one who kills women.

What Tap 2X said.

What happened to his first and second wives?

I just find the fact that Scott Peterson was convicted of murdering his wife and unborn child and now Drew Peterson is on trial for his wifes' murder interesting to say the least.

I wonder if Ancestry.com could find out if these two are related.

Let's not dismiss Ian so quickly, as he points out that men are automatic suspects in most if not all serious crimes. I recently heard on the news "the man" (suspect) concerning an arson, yet there were no witnesses.

Any job funded directly by taxpayers should always be subject to civilian review board scrutiny, anything less is nothing more than wholesale tyranny.

" Those who give up their freedom for the promise of security deserve neither" Abraham Lincoln

I'm a lot less concerned about how he looks...and a lot more concerned about how many of his wives have turned up dead or missing.

Neither constitutes guilt...but it certainly doesn't help the defense.

Men are only "automatic suspects" because they commit well over 90% of the world's violence. It would make no sense for a detective looking for a suspected child rapist/murderer to START looking for a woman. That's just common sense.

I watched the movie and Rob Lowe made him out to be creepy and a bit weird...I wonder if that was his slant on hs character, or if he was told Peterson actually acted that way.

Ian,

Did you follow any of the stories leading up to his arrest? Well here in Chicago we were spoon fed this garbage everyday by the media. Drew is an arrogant scum bag. Hope he gets convicted.

Maybe I’m missing something but was there a mention about any actual evidence against this guy. Charges and accusations make for interesting news copy but unless I'm mistaken it takes proof to convict. Personally I think he did it but if I was on the jury without any actual evidence I would have no choice but to vote not guilty.

otto-372694

They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

Ben Franklin

WisePati,

Ex-Cops are kept out of General Population.

To All,

I'd be willing to bet a pay check, that he walks.

......can we get back to taking out all the creepy, cocky guys??????!!!!!! I was grokin to that....'cept it would get pretty lonely round here.......

Nobody looks good in their mug shots, and the media usually finds just the right photo to paste into a story like this one.

Otto: the overwhelming majority of arsonists are men; less than 17% of arsonists have ever been women. If you are a newscaster making a guess, using 'he' would be a pretty good one by those odds.

Unfortunately for our ilk, it is MEN who committ the vast majority of all SERIOUS crimes; this only highlights man's inhumanity to man (and woman). The stats are all available online, you know?

Well, if nothing else, this case is a lesson to all future husbands who want to get rid of their wives that you have to cremate the body after you get the initial ruling of accident, then spread the ashes and get rid of everything that had to do with the dead wife. Once the potential crime is ruled an accident, you are not getting rid of evidence (aka obstruction of justice) because THERE IS NO CRIME.

IMO, based on the various rulings which should be allowing in all all sorts of otherwise illegal hearsay, this guy will be convicted. The state put so much effort into getting this guy. They tried everything, even trying to charge him with having an illegal shotgun, which was allowed for police officers and he was a police officer at the time.

When the state has decided you are guilty and they can't prove you committed a crime, they will make up a crime and try to convict you of that. Effectively, that is what is happening in this case. His last wife took off and they can't prove he did anything so they decided to dig up his third wife and what had been an accident is suddenly reviewed many years later and what was an accident is suddenly a murder. I don't know who this guy pissed off, but someone really has an ax to grind and Drew Peterson became the target.

Wow dirp that is a lot of conspiracy surrounding one lowly cop!

How many women do you know take off and never speak to their families that they were so very close to? Cause I betchya none of them are alive to say why they split.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If they couldn't convict Casey Anthony, then they are not going to convict this guy. All the evidence is heresay. As much as I want this arrogant $hitbag to see the inside of a cell for the rest of his life it's not gonna happen. Why else would he be so cockey?

And thanks MSNBC for elaborating on the judges decision to exclude the murder for hire witness. No need to explain WHY the judge threw it out. Is the guy no longer living? Could he not testify under oath to it in this trial? Did he refuse to do so? It's not an important detail or anything. It was only the headline of the damn story! Brilliant reporting as usual!

Please show some real evidence, otherwise a fair jury, (not considering facts that are not in evidence or information that has in been reported in the media) has to find him NOT GUILTY!

We don't convict people in this country because they look creepy or guilty .... or at least we are not supposed to .........

Actually - 85% of wives killed where by husbands - great statistics

Having said that this was wife number three who either went missing or drowned in a bathtub

Serial wife killer? Probably - arrogant cop who knew all the ins and outs - yes

My question is what took them so long to get this guy?

I was really creeped out when Petersons lawyers was gleefully happy that his missing wife can't be mentioned during the trial and laughing about Petersons missing wife on tv when a lawyer asked if any of them seriously thinks she is alive.

so much for guilty until proven innocent! i assume u are not american. at least i hope not.

I hope he lives another 30 years, all of it in prison.

...and no doubt you conducted the forensic psychiatric evaluation to be able to conclude he is.

ian: I guess you believe OJ did not murder Nicole either.

ian - you may want to reread your comment. In America, the phrase is "innocent until proven guilty."

And he was proven guilty.

Innocent until proven guilty - in a court of law. We are not in a court of law. We are not jurors. We have a right to speculate and give opinions.

Debra - don't get my hopes up! I thought the same thing about Casey Anthony and we all know how that turned out. Since he is only charged with the murder of the third wife, at least he can still be charged and tried for the murder of the fourth one day. I sincerely hope the prosecution can prevail with this case, but like I said, you never know.

this crappy story has been going on in chicago for several years now. EVERYONE knows his name and picture by now----all to well! we are sick, sick, sick of it, him and the story. everything.

i, for one, am so tired of hearing about this guy! this right after we finally got rid of the governor blagojevich story! and before that it was the governor before him, ryan, who went to prison! these stories take years and years before it reaches a conclusion.

but wait until the part about the blue plastic barrel! with the mentally challanged brother-in-law helping!! HELPING!!!!

and the illegal shotgun? it was illegal because the barrel was to short! being trained in firearms, i guess you would really need a bigger shot pattern! it really does not look good if you miss----with a shot gun!

at any rate, wives #1 and #2 got a divorce. and after wife #4 disappeared, a 18 year old girl moves in with him!!!! knowing full well that wife #3 died and #4 was just RECENTLY missing!!! but what the hell, let's roll the dice!!! again. seems drew does not like to be without female company!

(what is that old line about how 'beauty fades but dumb is forever'????!!)

and there is even the part of where a tv news anchorwoman was going out to see him, and was photographed/filmed in her bikini, getting in/out of the pool with him, going in and out of his house. on several occasions! she was ostensibly getting the inside story!!!! (i'm sure that wasn't all she was getting!) she was quickly fired from her anchor job (on chicago's NBC station(?)). it wasn't the way they got their stories. well, it was the way she got hers!!! errrr, story!

say what you want, creepy looking or not, this guy is a real babe magnet!!!

it is like fish jumping into the boat!! and he is still tied up to the dock!!

Please! There is overwhelming circumstantial evidence and YES people are convicted often on heavy circumstantial evidence. All I am praying for is a good, fair selection of jurors that plan to stay for the long hall and deliberate appropriately unlike the jurors on the Casey Anthony case. Lucky Jose Baez!

You are very much mistaken (or watch too much TV) if you believe a person cannot be convicted based on circumstancial evidence. Granted, it's usually not as convincing as direct evidence but juries are allowed to consider it. A jury may not find it credible, or relevant, or convincing, but it's not inadmissable just because it's circumstancial.

Why, because of a movie you saw on the Lifetime channel? That is the man-hater channel, all it ever shows are movies about rotten husbands that end up getting screwed ......for being criminals, no, for being rotten husbands...not for any other reason. As far as I know that is not felonious in any state, not even Illinois. That channel is for nasty women who hate what they can't have, a husband off their own, so they condemn everyone they have an opportunity to, and that they love.

All you have to do is look into this story a little bit to see what's going on here. I don't watch Lifetime lol.

The reason that there is no "Hard Evidence" is that he was a crooked police officer and had his buddies destroy the evidence that would have supportted the murder charge. As a Police Officer, I hope that he gets convicted and that he and Bubba live happily ever after

Jumpmaster: speak for yourself. If hearsay always led to convictions, there would indeed be many people in jail. But we wouldn't ALL be in jail. Even though he appears to be guilty as sin, he does have the right to a fair trial. But enough circumstantial evidence and hearsay can lead to a conviction.

I may have a little bit more information than many because I live two miles from BB where Drew Peterson lives.

Drew cheated on his first wife so she divorced him a few years into the marriage. She has remained quiet throughout this ordeal. His second wife charged him on numerous occasions with domestic violence only to drop the charges before she finally divorced him. He was already dating Kathleen by the time his divorce was finalized. She also made the same accusations of abuse shortly after their marraige - and in fact shared with family members that she feared for her life. Drew and Kathleen were pretty much history - all but the property settlement - when she died. They were due back in court in just a few days when she was found dead in the bathtub with not a drop of water in the tub. The autopsy showed death by drowning. Drew went over to talk to Kathleen that night and when no one opened the door after he knocked, he went next door to get a neighbor to enter the house with him. SOMEHOW he knew she was home but apparently knew he would need a witness when he entered the house. He instructed the neighbor to check upstairs while he checked downstairs. Of course, it was the neighbor who found Kathleen in an upstairs bathroom.

The talk around town is that other fellow officers covered up things when Kathleen was found dead but by the time that Stacey disappeared they weren't going to stick their necks out again. Drew was "told" to retire or resign from the department shortly after Stacey disappeared. He chose retirement even though it meant a loss in retirement pay instead of waiting a few months to get his full retirement pay.

First, there may not be any "hard evidence" because he ws a cop that knew how to cover his tracks but there is a ton of circumstantial evidence. As someone said, an individual can be convicted on circumstantial evidence.

Drew Peterson is as cocky as they come - I pulled up beside him at a stop light shortly before he was arrested. He was riding high on his motorcycle - every fiber of his body was saying "look at me - I am the king". I wouldn't say he is ugly or even hideous - more like a once good looking guy getting old -but he definitely a cock sure attitude that clearly shines through.

A few things stick out in my mind. Stacy, his 4th wife, by everyone's accounts was not the type that would walk away and leave her babies but yet that is what Drew is claiming she did. She "supposedly left her babies and her entire family behind to take off with another man. Not one person who knew her says she is capable of doing that. Yet, with all her pictures that have been published in papers all over the U.S. and on the internet reaching outside this country, no one has ever seen her. She had already shared with family members that she was going to leave Drew and that she was frightened for her life. She often related to her sister as well as a pastor of her fears for her life. The pastor has given his statement to the police that Stacey came to see him and told him that Drew had confessed to her that he killed Kathleen and that he could do the same to her and knew how to get away with it. Why didn't she go to the police. He was the police. Who would they believe - one of their own or a wife who was getting ready to divorce her husband? Everyone is sure that Stacey is dead and the pastor felt an obligation to reveal their conversation in the early days just in case she was still alive somewhere and in danger.

Next point, Drew's brother-in-law came forward to tell them that he feared he had helped Drew dispose of Stacey's body because Drew had enlisted him to help carry a 55 gal drum from their master bedroom on the day she disappeared. Drew's defense team has thrown out that the man USED to be an alcoholic so is not a reliable witness. He is and has been sober for several years so why would he recant such an event if it didn't happen. Also, repair men who went to the house saw a blue 55 gal drum sitting in the Peterson's garage just days before Stacey's disappearance.

Drew owns (or owned at that time) an airplane that was parked at a very small local airport right outside of Bolingbrook. He took that plane out on the day that Stacey disappeared.

Stacey was just a baby when she met Drew Peterson who was more than twice her age. He charmed his way into her life, even buying her a car, but then he began to control her every movement. He is so typical of an abuser - and sadly, the same end result when someone decides to get out. Almost all deaths that occur from a domestic violence incident happen when the victim has finally decided to leave. When the abuser realizes they have lost control, they totally lose it. This happened with Nicole and O.J. and it happened with Drew and Stacey. Pure greed was behind Kathleen's murder. Drew was furious when he realized that Kathleen was going to take their home and his pension as well. There was already a report on file where he broke into his old home and attacked Kathleen - telling her she should die. He just made it happen a few weeks later.

Dlynn: your little account is why we do not allow hearsay of rumor to be the basis of convictions. If the death was by drowning, wouldn't the original autopsy have evidence of that drowning. Was the original coroner so incompetent as to not find the evidence that you apparently have been able to find ?

I won't go into the various people who say they heard the third wife say that she heard Drew Peterson say something about the second wife. Hearsay is bad enough when you are unable to confront your accuser, when you get into triple hearsay, you may as well say rumor.

I don't know what your rambling about the brother-in-law of the fourth wife and the airplane and the age of the fourth wife have to do with the death of Kathleen Savio-Peterson, the one this trial is about. The same apples to Drew Peterson's retirement and his airplane ownership. You see, when you start to ramble about rumors, you end up confusing FACT with fiction. A trial should be about fact, not rumor.

Of course, if you want to just go on rumor, heck string him up, right next to Mitt Romney (for being a lying thief.)

Mitt Romney being a lying thief IS fact.

KARMA Or God Drew Peterson!PICK!

only if he rolls over ....................:)

I do not believe the prosecution has the evidence.

and since when does that matter? the city HAS to convict,its broke and the sharks ....er lawyers....would have a feeding frenzy from his incarceration prior to trial.

Scottmtm,

I agree with you, as long as Drew keeps saying 'I didn't do it', and other then that keeps his trap shut he will walk.

That is 100% correct. I'm a retired police detective & have investigated many, many, many deaths. Remember we are just citizen onlookers in this case, but from everything I have seen, there is not one shred of real evidence to convict the guy. (There may be more evidence that the police & prosecuters have that we have not seen yet.) I'm not saying he didn't do it or he did do it, but if a jury convicts him on this crap, he will just win on an appeal. Around here, the state's attorney would never have brought such a weak case to trail. This case is dead for the prosecution in ref to any real solid evidence. It's just the he said/she said crap. They are just going forward with the prosecution now to take a desperate shot and to make it the worst possible case scenerio for the defendant to go through, period.....

BRTCARGUY - Actually, the Will County Prosecutor wouldn't press charges either - when it happened and now we have another young mother dead because Peterson wasn't behind bars. You know and I know that the police most likely have evidence they have not shared with the public. With that said, I'm elated that he has spent the last year in jail - and hopefully it will be many more.

Dlynn: your speculation is why this case is going forward. I bet you actually believe that the state could not possibly try to railroad someone, like the 17 CONVICTED KILLERS who, it was later proven with DNA evidence, could not have possibly committed the crime.

I find it very interesting that several of the overturned convictions in the state of Illinois have come from Will County. Will and DuPage county prosecutors are known for not letting the facts get in the way of a conviction.

TO give drew a hard time by going to trial seems like tax payer money well spent!

even when there is so little of it to go around!! DUH????!!!

to go to trial with so little ammo is sad. there is no double jeopardy! so if he gets off, he walks.

better to wait until they can get a better case.

some women have no taste....but like the old commercial use to say.. whatta you want? good taste or taste good?................:)

And you are privy to all of this information, how? Are you another Man-hater?

He will still have women writing to him while he's in prison. One of them will probably eventually marry him in prison. Maybe even a female guard. Some women think the jail website in their state is a dating site. Go figure!

you got it freedom, weird isn't it? turns out Forrest has been right all along......you may have a cookie......................

He had a girlfriend while the investigation was going on, a young, naive-looking girl in her 20s, I believe? I wonder if she got some common sense pounded into her brain and left him by now.

Daniel Calc as a matter of fact, I love men. Would much rather associate with men than women. And no, I am not privy to any information that you can't get but I do go a lot by gut instinct. My gut tells me to never, NEVER go near a man like that and to keep myself safe, I follow my gut! How about you? Don't you have just a little bit of 'feeling' about his guilt? Maybe you should become his best friend and offer to testify for him in court. HA! Or are you just devil's advocate?

Hot in Miami - Yes, his girlfriend has left Drew. Her father was very vocal about telling anyone and everyone that he was totally against his daughter's relationship so I am sure her family was finally able to talk some sense into her.

From what I understand the responding officer to the scene of Savio's death didn't follow protocol because she was "found" by Drew Peterson, who was also law enforcement. Therefore no evidence was collected, which clearly hampers the prosecution's case. At the very least that officer should have been penalized for his egregious lack in judgement.

The coroner changed the cause of death from accidental to homicide after exhumation of Savio's body, which they don't often do. Given the CSI effect on juries today, the DA must have concluded there was enough to proceed to trial.

At the very least that officer should have been penalized for his egregious lack in judgement.

remember where this is taking place?!?.....good luck with that.............:)

the law in america doesnt matter. its a joke. mere suspicion is sufficient to convict a man to prison for life. its just like the salem witch trials. do you think americans learned any lessons from that?

they did not, you fool! americans are so, so much dumber than you think. mere suspicion is enough to convict a man to death.

The facts will convict him.

Some people whom we believe to be quite guilty (OJ and Casey Anthony) got off. And some people who were convicted of crimes were innocent. It's an imperfect system that needs reform as everything else in this country and every other country. But I still rather have a 12 person jury of my peers instead of just 1 judge deciding my fate like in countries such as Singapore.

ian, Why don't you say where you're from? From your statements, you have no real knowledge of the legal system in the U.S. and sound like an obnoxious foreign ass. A mere doubt can set a killer free much easier than mere suspicion will convict a man to death. There are mistakes made, but I'm sure that doesn't happen in the rat hole you're from!

ian is a TROLL, pure and simple; no one can have an opinion that differs from him/her (I suspect 'him') or the result is constant badgering.

I would say - ignore it, and maybe it'll go away.

Jennifer: if there were facts, then I would have no problem with a conviction. Unfortunately, this "case" is based on rumor, conjecture, and a whole lot of hearsay.

The problem with hearsay is that it denies a defendant the fundamental right to confront his accuser.

If we are going to convict based solely on hearsay and conjecture, without any facts to back them up, we may as well not have a trial and just put people on pikes based on rumors. Even Jesus Christ had the right to confront his accusers.

Most men that abuse women are cowards.

so very very true but leave out the "most" part still.....you may have a cookie

but I would be afraid to marry again for fear I might get the abusive kind.

thiat would be a sad lonely life, you know the signs, never limit yourself girl. there are still a few of us good guys out here. first sign of trouble, split. that goes for all ladies reading this, he will not change,.... i repeat ...HE WILL NOT CHANGE. ...if you find yourself in the type of situation Gerri mentioned. GTFO.......

Gerri, I'm sorry for what you went through, not all men are bad. However, I know what you went through it took me 24 yrs to remarry and we're in it 15 months and I have been given the gift of bruises under my arm and recently pushed into the kitchen counter which left both forearms really badly bruised. I did not see it coming. I was divorced at 23 and I feel stupid. My daughter is/was dating a Mississippi cop and he's broke down her front door, shoved her and such. She has even said to me she can go to no one. Him and his felloe officers are 25 and older dating 19 yr old girls taking them to bars (UNDERAGE DRINKING< HELLO) nothing will happen to them.

I have been there so I know where you're coming from. My suggestion? Just have a relationship without marrying or living together. That way, if he does a 360 and turns into an @$$, you tell him to stop calling you and don't have to deal with him or see him ever again, instead of dealing with a contested divorce, the threats, the inability to get him out of your house, and having to give up 50% of your assets in divorce court. This lets you have some degree of control, rather than putting yourself in a vulnerable, powerless position. I'm not telling you what to do, but simply, providing you with an idea so you can still have a relationship without feeling trapped, which is what I'm trying to do in my own life.

An awful lot of widows and divorcees never remarry. Once you have been used and abused in the name of "love" why go back. All most men want is a live in hooker and maid/slave. Why would anyone voluntarily go back to that?

never: if your daughter has not left the guy and he is still like that, she needs to leave him. As to the cops supposedly protecting their own, if they have any integrity, they won't. Once they see reality, they know very much your daughter could be their daughter and they won't allow it to continue.

If she complains and nothing happens with the city cops, call the county or the state, those guys don't take no @!$%# from no one.

but the 'girlfriend' moved in and out several times before leaving for good!

it took a while!! 'dumb is forever.........."

HOT IN MIAMI.

why does that title/handle just not fit the picture of you trying to have a good relationship? gee, i don't know, but somehow hanging yourself out there with ''HOT IN MIAMI" just doesn't fit very well.

it seems you are sending out, yet again, mixed signals.

and you wonder why it doesn't work. perhaps professional help might help you sort it out. we can only hope.

cop.....chicago....and you expected?...........................

Technically the fourth wife is missing. No body = no murder. Sad, but true. The reason it has taken so long is because they have been going back and forth with motions mostly about whether or not hearsay evidence would be allowed. That is a big part of the prosecution's case, so they need it to be allowed. I wish they could prove what happened to the fourth wife so they could try him for that too.

Actually, not quite true. More than one person has been convicted of murder without a body.

I dont know all the ins and outs of this case cause it has just dragged out way too long but does he look sinister - yes, is he arrogant - yes, did he kill this wife - probably, but last I heard you cant convict someone on *probably*. Yes people can be convicted on circumstantial evidence (like Casey Anthony should have been) but in this case apparently the Prosecution has no way of specifically tying Drew Peterson to her death. He has the advantage of being an ex-cop thus knowing ways to cover his tracks not only in this death but in the disappearance of his last wife. If he could be convicted on the smart-azz look on his face he would be convicted in a second. But that is not how the law works. So I wont be surprised if he is acquitted and tries to use this case to write a book and to soak up more of the limelight that he has enjoyed thus far. I just hope every woman out there takes a good long look at him and if he gets out not go near him with a ten foot pole.

lawful1,

Not true, he could choose a bench trial (judge only), but he probably will not. If I was in his shoes in this case I would though, most judges do not like cicumstantial evidence to make a trial.

its not a judicial system its a criminal court system, BIG difference................

The court system IS the judicial system.

different Branch's of a redundant system....justice can and often is bought.....course depending on your train of thought .............

protective custody.....nuff said....would be nice though..........................:)

It is odd because it is a pack of lies, and he is smirking because he thinks he is going to walk.

Yeah and didn't she tell a priest and her sister that if "I end up gone he killed me." Then they made that peterson's law or whatever..

Too bad they cannot use that in his case or can they?

Very odd, yes. But if you asked his attorney's, I'm sure they'd say but not beyond the realm of possibility. Anyway, since that is a different case all together, it likely won't even be mentioned during his trial.

maybe they can get the ghost whisperer on it, at least we would get to see Jennifer.......beat the hell out of looking at this smug schmuck...............................:)

And no one has heard from her at all? That's very odd indeed.

not if your a tad bit on the dead side...............................:)

Odd to me since he's been in custody Stacy has not came forward after "running off with another man". One would think she'd like to see her children and family who haven't heard anything from here since she "R-U-N-N-O-F-TEED".

dont know if hes from the ME but .....shariah law....stoning....drew .....yep that works..........:)

( if of course he is found guilty, i vote we try out this whole shariah gig, just this one time)..............:)

Jennifer? the ghost whisperer? is that you?......................:)

Drew's own stepbrother tried to commit suicide after fearing he may have helped dispose of her body. His name is Thomas Morphey. Goolgle Drew Peterson, Mims, and Thomas Morphey all together and you'll find the reports.

Jennifer - After his brother-in-law helped him move the blue barrell from the master bedroom - and back to his vehicle in the garage, the brother-in-law never saw it again. Drew denied it being in the garage even though workers at the home saw it several days before Stacey's disappearance. Speculation is that Drew drove to the tiny local airport outside of Bolingbrook and loaded the barrell into his plane. There is no telling where he dumped the barrell before he returned to the airport. Also, his cell phone was drawing pings from a location close to a waterway between Lockport and Romeoville (adjacent towns). A search team came in from TX and checked the entire area - including the water - but again locals believe he did this to throw everyone off He claimed he was not in that area the day she disappeared. You have to admit, it was a smart move on his part. Go to a location where you know her body is not and then claim you were never there to draw suspicion. This occurred in the evening hours AFTER he flew back into the small airport.

Personally, I think they may have more evidence linking him to Stacey's death than they do Kathleen's but as long as he is behind bars, other women are safe.

Sociopaths don't kill people. He's a psychopath. There is a difference. Bernie Madoff is a sociopath.

perfect criminal?...in jail, now trial.......evidently not.................:)

IAScooter.. which side are you actually on?

Sociopaths can and do kill people.

A lot of tubs and sinks will slowly drain out, as the stopper doesn't have a good seal or the o-ring is bad or missing. After so much time, the water would slowly drain away, hours or a day or two, depending on how bad it was leaking.

thank you Steve, im certain that's what happened..... it was that "o" ring not the "oh @!$%#" ring....................:)

Do you know when the last time he claimed he saw her alive before finding her in the tub?

Do you know when the last time he claimed he saw her alive before finding her in the tub?

right before her "accident"..????..............................:)

let me know if i win.....................:)

He had visitation rights with his and Kathleen's two sons. He picked them up for the weekend and just happened to go back by himself to check on Kathleen. Of course, he made sure he wasn't the one that found her but the neighbor next door that he talked into going into the house with him. He was so sure she was in trouble that he had a locksmith come to the house to open the door. All by the book. As someone said, he didn't even try to explain how the bathtub was dry - he let others say it. Unfortunately, his fellow officers back then didn't even look at Drew as a suspect - but when Stacey disappeared, it was a wake up call for them. None backed him up this time around. No one could even tried to explain how she was covered in bruises. No only did she drown, but she must have thrown herself around the bathtub before falling in the last time.

I bet he didn't plan on the water draining out of the tub...but that's what I think happened.

He didn't "stage" a damn thing - his friends in the Bolingbrook PD did all that for him. She was found face down in a dry bathtub with her head smashed. They all decided it was an accident right away (one of Peterson's friends even admtted this), then made up a story to explain what they found. Can you imagine if a "civilian" made up a story like his? "Let's see...she could have fallen backwards, smashed the back of her head on the edge of the tub, then rolled over, then drowned, then all the water drained out of the tub. Yeah, that's it".

This is no criminal mastermind here, folks. If the "referee" is a member of your team, and you know he won't call a foul on you, you can hack away all you want with no finesse at all.

hang what?....................:)

( yes i know and no im not a member of the vine S&G PD.)

Stop trolling and at least contribute something besides smarta$$ remarks IAScooter.

It is hard to imagine

its easy if you try...no hell below us...above us only sky............:)

Fail.