Military: Service members, not bosses, to blame in Colombia prostitution scandal

A woman identifying herself as the escort who had a confrontation with a Secret Service agent who refused to pay her fee spoke publically during a paid interview on a Colombian radio network. NBC's Mark Potter reports.

Individual decisions, not tolerance by their superiors, were behind the misconduct of 12 service members working in Colombia to prepare for President Barack Obama’s visit last April, the U.S. Southern Command reported Friday. The misconduct, it said, ranged from having prostitutes at their hotel rooms to propositioning college-age greeters at their hotel and even allowing bomb-sniffing dogs to sleep in hotel beds and defecate on bed sheets. 

"Military and civilian leaders did not create or foster an atmosphere of tolerance for prostitution or marital infidelity," investigators said in the report, part of which was released to the public.

The misconduct prior to the Summit of the Americas resulted from "individual decisions," and not a single, coordinated party or event condoned by superiors, it added. 


The scandal unfolded when the hotel where the 12 men were staying notified the U.S. Embassy of concerns, the report noted. Those were:

  • Keeping their female companions past the allowable hour of 6 a.m. on April 12.
  • Drinking alcohol at the pool.
  • Allowing bomb-detection dogs to sleep in the beds, soil the linens and go to the bathroom in inappropriate areas around the hotel.
  • Propositioning college-age female greeters at the hotel who were working with the Colombian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 

Prostitution is legal in Colombia but it is prohibited under the Uniform Code of Military Conduct.

And, despite the fact that the rules for the U.S. military assigned to the Summit of the Americas included a curfew and restriction on alcohol consumption, they did not prohibit the U.S. military members from visiting specific locations, such as prostitute bars, or from having foreign nationals in their hotel rooms. 

The report concluded that the actions did not compromise national security. "No sensitive items were stored or permitted in the individual military members' hotel rooms," it stated.

Seven Army soldiers and two Marines have received administrative punishments. Three of them have requested courts martial, which would give them a public trial to contest the punishments.

A dozen Secret Service officers, agents and supervisors were also implicated. Eight have been forced out of the agency, three were cleared of serious misconduct, and at least two are fighting to get their jobs back. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

 

 

 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4

If the military starts going after every single service member who engages a prostitute, a third of the enlisted and probably a quarter of the officers will end up being brought up on charges within a very short period of time. They will have to increase the number of lawyers in the military by at last ten fold just to handle these cases. The only thing that these guys did wrong is that they let their activities become a public image problem for the military. To go after these men seems highly hypocritical since I would bet that at least some of the people who are writing the reprimands have been guilty of the same offense themselves on more than one occasion. I am not saying that the behavior is proper or something that should be encouraged, I just question the selective punishment of these service members.

  • 15 votes
#1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 6:56 PM EDT

They knew better and chose not to follow the rules. Make them examples so others don't do the same. The Lesson Learned is what we can take away from this unfortunate event.

  • 12 votes
#1.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 7:51 PM EDT

Sure the boss is always innocent—the higher the chain of command the more innocent they become—the year is 2012 I wonder how long the ones in charge can lie to themselves and the pubic..

  • 14 votes
#1.2 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 9:54 PM EDT

Every time something happens involving the military it's always the lower ranks that get the discipline. Example=Abu Graibh. Time to make the higher ups accountable also.

  • 8 votes
#1.3 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:21 PM EDT

You all miss the point, if it had not been the fact these people were under the presidential protection detail, there might not have been a thing said about it, without going into a soap box tirade, it's safe to say that when your primary job is to protect the president, your held to a different standard right or wrong.....

  • 4 votes
#1.4 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:30 PM EDT

kip360

it's safe to say that when your primary job is to protect the president, your held to a different standard right or wrong.....

It's safe to say that when you are in the military, sh!t rolls downhill.

  • 5 votes
#1.5 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:47 PM EDT

I am astonished at people that have this level of clearance / responsibility would behave as pigs. Who puts the President's life at risk for a screw? Who allows an animal to defecate indoors, as a guest of another nation no less?

This is not normal, its not par for the course, and I hope that these nasty vermin are fired and lose their benefits / pensions as this behavior was not an accident, this was all done on purpose.

  • 11 votes
#1.6 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:26 PM EDT

Kip360, if they respect the subject of their mission. Not many do.

  • 4 votes
#1.7 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:30 PM EDT

Typical of the news media to print something about the Military... They put the men and women in harms way then let the news media do what they do worse screw the men and women who are there to keep freedom of the press they die in the wars while the news media cuts them down.. Let them get a chewing out and for get it ..The military takes care of it own,, But the leadership must be worse now days.. Protect your troops don't get your face on the tv just to get your next Star.

  • 1 vote
#1.8 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:33 PM EDT

Revise that. My 20+ years in the military showed me the officers were the biggest pervs out there. As an enlisted, at times I was embarrased by the sophmoric behavior of the "elite". Basically, if you eliminated the enlisteds, the officers would have nothing to do. If you got rid of the officers, the enlisteds would still have a job. Rings true with politicians, doesn't it.

  • 3 votes
#1.9 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:49 PM EDT

Back in 1986, or so, I was out flying a mission, and we got typhoon evacuated (could not land at home base) to the Philippines. When we got off the plane, the whole crew was given a how-not-to-get-STDs briefing, and handed condoms by people in charge (I honestly can't remember who after a 22-hour day, and it was about 1 am when we got there. It may have been our senior people from the plane, or the people at Clark Air Base).

We had guys, who brought up a new hooker "fiancée" from the Philippines to live with them in the dorms every few months. It was known about, tolerated, and maybe even encouraged in a fratboy way.

Unless they clamped down on policy, like after Tailhook, they are just being hypocritical about things they KNEW damn well were going on, and they really never bothered to give a crap about before.

  • 3 votes
#1.10 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:57 PM EDT

JS, these were "servicemen" only in a formal sense. They were on a diplomatic mission, duty bound to give a positive image to the USA. They were not combat soldiers dealing with the stress of recent battle!

The report is of course a whitewash intended to clear those above a certain rank. It won't fly. We have Senate committees to make sure those in command accept their responsibilities instead of pointing fingers downward.

  • 2 votes
#1.11 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:18 AM EDT

Strange how they want to hang the service men from the highest yardarm but when a democrat president does something similar it is excused by saying "it is only sex", re clinton.

It seems the dems never stop attacking the service men and women in this country. Their lastest attack is to try and keep them from voting in Ohio.

  • 6 votes
#1.12 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 1:31 AM EDT

Dave

What an ugly comment and couldn't be more untrue. Check out the administration's vigorous enforcement of UOCAVA across the nation to make sure service members receive their ballots in sufficient time to absentee vote... because states weren't doing it!

    #1.13 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 6:19 AM EDT

    Military: Service members, not bosses, to blame in Colombia prostitution scandal

    Bullsh!t. After 20+ years in the military, I can tell you that the lower ranks do exactly what the upper ranks allow them to do. Someone, or quite possibly several someones, in their chain of command have not been checking on these people. If they had, this sh!t would not have happened...not at this level anyway.

    • 4 votes
    #1.14 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 11:14 AM EDT

    Right on, earth!

    We didn't accept this sort of excuse from Japanese war criminals ("A man away from home has no neighbors") and it is no more valid here. The doctrine of command responsibility should be applied now as then, when Gen. Yamashta went to the gallows.

    For the benefit of the truly dumb It has been codified: all Americans on official business, military or civilian, will continue to be bound by the laws of the United States wherever they are sent.

      #1.15 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 11:35 AM EDT

      all this came about because of them not paying up for services rendered would have been alot cheaper just to pay up . hide sight is 20/20

      • 1 vote
      #1.16 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 11:39 AM EDT

      The bomb sniffing dogs have an excuse for their animalistic behavior, but there is no excuse for the humans.

      • 1 vote
      #1.17 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:09 PM EDT

      Who puts the President's life at risk for a screw?

      Show me where the President's life was at risk at ANY point when this was happening. He wasn't even in the f*cking country.

      • 2 votes
      #1.18 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:15 PM EDT

      Boy I saw this commin a mile away. As a 23 year Army Vet, never blame the higher ranking officals. No way. No matter what the case or who's involved. If ya violate the UCMJ, Take your punishment and go on with your career. But dont let anyone make a scape goat out of ya just to keep the monkey off their back. And the press need to get their Liberal prejudgemental ass off the backs of our military. Or someday they may be fighting their own battle for freedom. Cause there sure is no freedom of the press in today's market. I remember the press back in the day's of Viet Nam. Lie to the public, just like they do today. Did'nt like them then dont like them now. And Supervisors Civilian or Military that wont stand up for their troops or agents in this case. Ya'll might need to think about another line of work. I remember the Officer's that would fight for their troop's. Can ya spell WHITE WASH.

        #1.19 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:41 PM EDT

        Whiskey Eye, Maybe the service was'nt worth payin for. Been quite a few place's in my career where, Aint no way in hell i'd pay some of the hooker's.

          #1.20 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:48 PM EDT

          Why not blame the folks who did the deed and no one else? Isn't that is what it is all about? If they wouldn't have had an issue with payment then she wouldn't have gone to the police.

          • 1 vote
          #1.21 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 1:24 PM EDT

          Being retired military, I knew what my troops were doing. I wonder why these peoples superiors didn't know what they were doing since they were supposed to be setting up protective areas for the PRESIDENT. These supervisors should be punished, too.

          I know of instances where a supervisor was busted in rank or in one case sent to prison for what his troops did. Because they did nothing or ignored their responsibilities to lead. Times sure have changed.

            #1.22 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 1:25 PM EDT

            Robert, I have no idea when you were active, but I do know from my own experiences ( 1967-1987 enlisted through E-6 and then officer through 0-4, most of that time spent pulling liberty somewhere in the Pacific) that, yes, in times gone by, as regards drinking and prostitution, supervisors, both enlisted supervisors and officer supervisors, knew exactly what their men were doing...because the supervisors were right there with them doing the same thing! And that's the same thing our fathers, grandfathers, and generations throughout history were doing.

            Sex is pretty much a basic draw for members of the human race. Without it we wouldn't be here.

            • 1 vote
            #1.23 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 1:43 PM EDT

            Tsun Tsu declared that those in leader positions are responsible for the actions of the soldiers under their command. This is required reading at every one of our military academies. But, when things happen these days, they always get the bye. When you fail to enforce the rules, you create this type of incedents. When i was in the service, I saw the vast majority of the people I knew, enlisted, or command abuse one chemical substance or another. But, they did this after the required work had been done, by everyone from top to bottom. As long as the leaders aren't punished, disapline will be a serious problem.

              #1.24 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 1:58 PM EDT

              Like everything else in the Obama administration..... It has to be Bush's fault!

                #1.25 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 2:05 PM EDT

                Don't do the Crime!

                  #1.26 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 2:10 PM EDT

                  Sorry, the blame should fall not only on the service men but also on the officer in charge. He or she is responsible for the actions of their command and it looks like they turned a blind eye to what was going on. If punishment is being handed out they should be included if for no other reason then not doing their job.

                    #1.27 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 2:22 PM EDT

                    I'll never forget when the Tailhook incident occurred in the early 1990's, an event for naval pilots, which are all officers and in which they acted inappropriately sexually harassing women and even some rapes occurred. But when they ran a photo in the newspapers, it was of an enlisted sailor who wasn't even at the event. It is called misdirection! Of course no higher-ups were involved in this latest scandal.

                      #1.28 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 2:25 PM EDT

                      NBC wonders why its losing popularity by printing this. If Bush was President they would not be printed this damage control article. Instead they do damage control for Obama because of his failing Presidency.

                      Way to go with NBC with your balanced reporting of the news.

                        #1.29 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 2:30 PM EDT

                        To go after these men seems highly hypocritical since I would bet that at least some of the people who are writing the reprimands have been guilty of the same offense themselves on more than one occasion.

                        With that type of thinking nobody should ever be held accountable for any wrong doings. I should never discipline my child because I did the same things. We should never give speeding tickets because we have all exceeded the speed limit at some point in time. That's just crazy liberal thinking.

                        Accountability has no allies, you own it from the ground up.

                          #1.30 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 3:04 PM EDT

                          Bull, the whole mess including the secret service and tailhook for those who referenced it were a symptom of a leadership (Obama and Clinton) where anything goes if you don't get caught.

                            #1.31 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 3:10 PM EDT

                            Yes, I do feel like "shaking my head"

                            I wonder how many" millions of actions" were done in Vietnam with over 600,000 babies made by US men, and many were exported to here for adoption, since no one wanted the poor kids------- most of you dishing here have no idea about a lot of things regarding this subject.

                            And yes, most military people are republicans, so what does this have to do with Obama and Clinton?--Pigs will be pigs--I mean brawn's will be brawn's--or just; men will be men, look at Normandy in France my ancestors were there 1000 years ago--and look at the tall slender blonds all over to this day --pigs!

                            Has anyone even checked Iraq and Afghanistan yet (never hear about this subject), or are we still like the Muslims, and the women are just tools?--Oh, I am sorry is that not what we are fighting for them for--rights for all!

                              #1.32 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 3:29 PM EDT

                              @shaking,

                              Let me finish your post:

                              ......................and if you do get caught, just lie about it, like your supposed to.

                                #1.33 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 3:29 PM EDT

                                WAIT....umm, this is NOT Bush's fault?

                                  #1.34 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 3:45 PM EDT

                                  Washington, what is the difference between the prostitutes in Columbia, and the politicians who prostitute themselves to the Washington lobbyists? The ones in Columbia only trade what is rightfully theirs TO trade. You worry more about what those prostitutes in Columbia did with the Secret Service, than what the political prostitutes are doing to this country. Yep, we know where the priorities are.

                                    #1.35 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 4:11 PM EDT

                                    It's ALWAYS someones elses fault in the USA, We are not honorable men and women anymore. Actually, I can understand why we are not "World leaders" anymore, WE SUCK! And im embaraassed to say it, but we are.

                                      #1.36 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 5:36 PM EDT

                                      Mr. justoneguy -

                                      Mr. Bush hasn't been to Colombia in many, many years.

                                      He's still clean.

                                        #1.37 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 9:05 PM EDT

                                        Ms. Lady Cat -

                                        The criminal is the p#ick who did the p#icking, not his supervisor miles or more away.

                                          #1.38 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 10:43 PM EDT

                                          Need to look at it this way... if a player on a sports team is irresponsible and makes the team look bad, the owners get rid of him as he is surely a problem.

                                          BUT

                                          If a TEAM is irresponsible and makes the OWNER look bad you get rid of the MANAGER as he should have control over the team! Doesn't matter if the supervisor was half way around the world, he obviously has no control of his team, get rid of him!

                                            #1.39 - Mon Aug 6, 2012 10:51 AM EDT

                                            STREET level HO's what a disgrace to this county. They couldv'e at least hired a group of "escorts" maybe they wouldn't have been caught. But hey pay up the 20.00 for a blo& job next time.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #1.40 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:40 AM EDT
                                            Reply

                                            And who says Americans are pigs?

                                            • 5 votes
                                            Reply#2 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 7:04 PM EDT

                                            Americans are pigs, that is what the world loves about us. There was a group of Navy Sailors in Cyprus who went into a Russian mafia bar, bought a ton of drinks danced with all the girls and offended some Russian bad ass. The Sailors then proceeded (when provoked) to beat the @!$%# out of the Russian and all of the Russian bouncers who were part of the mafia, some got pepper sprayed but still fought the Russians. The fact of the matter is, we want our men to be bad ass. We want out men to kick ass. We are proud when they do. Let Sailors be Sailors ... We need to continue to be the bad ass brawlers the world expects us to be. They don't love and respect America because of our policies they love and respect us because we can back them up. There is something fundamental to America about the brawling Sailor or Marine. I personally have been in clubs where we kicked the bouncers ass and the girls loved it and showered us with kisses and dances. When provoked America is the rattlesnake in the "Don't tread on me" flag. The rattlesnake was a species native to North America that they didn't have anywhere else. It is very territorial and when it strikes it will kill you. Early Americans had a real respect for this creature and they passed that respect on to Britain back in 1776. The entire world respects American's readiness to fight. It's time we honor that, get your sticky Liberal hands out of our @!$%#ing business and let us handle our @!$%#ing business. You just sit back and reap the rewards we give you.

                                            • 6 votes
                                            #2.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 9:32 PM EDT

                                            Umm...nuitarus...that is the biggest pile of horse sh*t I have ever read and a sad excuse of how your define yourself as an American.

                                            DSP - CAPT/USNR

                                            • 14 votes
                                            #2.2 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:01 PM EDT

                                            I'd expect nothing less from an Officer. I'm sorry SIR. While we are off serving our country you are working 2 jobs a year for your 100K plus paycheck. I'm not an idiot. I'm senior enlisted and I know the only difference between a Ensign and a Seaman is at least a Seaman has been promoted twice. I understand it takes a lot to become a Captain in the United States Navy and I've met some reserve Captains that I will cherish for the rest of my life. However. As a Flag Officer in the United States Navy you ought to know your Sailors. We are not nice and politically correct. We do not intend to be and despite what the Admiral tells you we should be, we are young Americans. You know the last time I saw a Flag Officer bleed for his country? Never. I have though, I mean you no disrespect but leave the little @!$%# to us sir. It's what we are good at. Chances are if you are in the medical community we've already met.

                                            • 3 votes
                                            #2.3 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:12 PM EDT

                                            Nuitarus, The time to let the fight in a young man out isn't necessarily in a bar, it's on the field of battle or the heat of battle, all the rest of the time we represent the U.S. For some times the only way the rest of the world sees the U. S. is from what our young military members do, Yup, we want the world to fear our military, when we have to fight, but know that they are respected by our military members when we visit. Go ahead keep your vision and we will have to continue to fight everyone we meet for ever. CMS USAF RET

                                            • 3 votes
                                            #2.4 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:45 PM EDT

                                            Common Sense: Really...so Russian Sailors or Soldiers dont take advantage of TDY trips to other countries? French Soldiers? (They are the worst). Canadians Soldiers. I dont think you ever been on a Joint Readiness Training Exercises with other countries- you would think American Soldiers were sublime compared to the *#@$ Ive seen by other countries.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #2.5 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:33 PM EDT

                                            Back in the '70s, an American Icebreaker was returning from Antarctica stopped in Tahiti for a little R&R. They (one American ship) kicked the @!$%# out of the French Navy in a bar fight. There have been no invites from the French for another American Icebreaker to call in Tahiti since then. Good job!!!

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #2.6 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:53 PM EDT

                                            nuitarus, I think what Oilman meant was that your stories about kicking the &%$#@ out of people and Mafia bars on Cyprus lack credibility. I myself detected a rising odor of b.s. as I was reading.

                                            These fantasies are so common among those who have not grown up--or never will.

                                            • 7 votes
                                            #2.7 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:37 AM EDT

                                            I travelled a lot while in the US Marine Corps, and I once had someone call me a loud mouth foul minded egotistical little american pig.

                                            I replied: " Who you calling little?"

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #2.8 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:03 PM EDT

                                            I was in Langkawi, Malaysia for Lima '95 and some of the guys from our ship were in a bar drinking with some sailors off the Russian boats. One of our young idiots got wasted and punch a Russian before passing out. The Russian actually laughed it off and helped carry the kid back to our ship. This has no relevance to the discussion but it's the first time I remembered this since that night.

                                            • 2 votes
                                            #2.9 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:19 PM EDT

                                            I'm sorry, but there is a big difference between the Secret Service and the Marines. The Secret Service is there to immediately protect the POTUS. There is a different level of professionalism required for each of the jobs. The Secret Service is there in an almost invisible, but, strong way. The Marines are always "in your face"! I have no problem with Secret Service members screwing themselves silly on their own time, but, when they are there to protect the President, any president, they have a different set of standards. The chain of command should be punished from bottom to top!

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #2.10 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 2:11 PM EDT

                                            I remember a case from the 1970s. A Greek sailor was with a prostitute when he was ashore, and he got an STD. He was brought up on charges.

                                            The Court decided it was "service connected."

                                              #2.11 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 2:13 PM EDT

                                              nuitarus - from a single statement you make the judgement that I'm some privileged trust fund baby? Aside from your completely moronic diatribe about how you think it's okay to act like a neanderthal on foreign soil because being an American gives you a license to be that way, you couldn't be any further out in left field as to who I am as a person either.

                                              I will keep this short. I come from a family of humble means and grew up in the great state of Maine. Despite our lack of privilege, I was taught core values and had both the smarts and ambition to achieve something greater. I worked my ass off for what I have and never asked for anyone to kiss my ass for it much less believe it gives me carte blanche to think I'm "above" any American or non-American because of it.

                                              As for your comment about never having seen a Flag Officer "bleed" I have two points in response: 1) Captains are not flag officers...flag officers are O-7 and above, and 2) THIS Captain took two bullets in Desert Storm and was awarded a Bronze Star with (V) distinction when he was a wet-behind-the-ears active duty UNRESTRICED LINE LTJG.

                                              My view point has ZERO to do with political correctness. I'm a strong believer in American Exceptionalism, but it seems we all have different interpretions of what that is. Your interpretation will ensure that we will continue to be hated and despised.

                                              So, no...I am quite sure we have never met. However, I can guarantee you that I would not hesitate to ram the UCMJ down your throat if you were ever standing in front of me at Captain's Mast for such behavior.

                                                #2.12 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 2:17 PM EDT

                                                nuitarus -

                                                Back off and point your pecker in the other direction.

                                                  #2.13 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 8:16 PM EDT

                                                  HO s before bro s

                                                    #2.14 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:43 AM EDT
                                                    Reply

                                                    Still beating this dead horse!!

                                                    Love these capitol hill hypocrites who all have a hooker or two on speed dial.

                                                    • 8 votes
                                                    Reply#3 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 7:05 PM EDT

                                                    Flogging a dead horse is the mark of someone who is into sadism, necrophilia and bestiality.

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #3.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:45 PM EDT
                                                    Reply

                                                    All because one idiot refused to pay for services rendered. What was he thinking?

                                                    • 6 votes
                                                    Reply#4 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 7:16 PM EDT

                                                    It's not what was he thinking, it's what was he thinking with?

                                                    • 3 votes
                                                    #4.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:22 PM EDT

                                                    You active duty Service Members enjoy that fun and paycheck now. Obama, is gonna make you guys the smallest Military in HISTORY! You'll be lucky if you can afford a prostitute.

                                                    • 3 votes
                                                    #4.2 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:30 PM EDT

                                                    Obama, is gonna make you guys the smallest Military in HISTORY!

                                                    If Obama keeps it up he is going to turn us into another 3rd world country. But don't worry; if you get in his way on his attept at gaining power he will grind you into the ground just like he is trying to do to us. All he wants is every bit of power he can get; he doesn't care what he has to do in the attempt.

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #4.3 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 4:58 PM EDT

                                                    Oh and after all his yapping about reducing unemployment in this country, if he slashes the military he will have to justify adding hundreds of thousands of people to those rolls. Early retirement won't take care of a family with young children.

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #4.4 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 5:08 PM EDT

                                                    True Rene, this election is very important for all the Service Members. It is they, who will suffer the most. The civilians surrounding the bases will go out of business. Obama, has a dream for America and its very BAD for us all. Look at the bullsh*t promises he made to Boone County, West Virginia. Coal Miners 12% unemployed, while we tax payers are picking up the tab for Solyndra.

                                                    Romney 2012.

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #4.5 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 7:05 PM EDT

                                                    While it is true that the future is "troubling" for obsolete energy sources, and obsolete military programs, the rest of the country/world can't sustain that status quo. Not just the bases (like our Davis Monthan AFB and several others within 100 miles of me), but also Raytheon here. And all of the ripple.

                                                    Yes, that is correct. EVERYBODY! Not just the middle and lower class. EVERYBODY will have to chip in.

                                                    While the middle/lower class actually DO the fighting, the upper class get a tax cut. There is no call for shared sacrifice. There is no "war tax" imposed on anyone. Place IOU in bottle and throw out to sea.

                                                    I swear, this "reality" is looking more and more like Carpenter's "They Live", and the signal is originating from Faux Nuze (and funded by the slime of the Earth).

                                                    NOW FIND THOSE SUNGLASSES!!!

                                                      #4.6 - Sun Aug 5, 2012 1:08 AM EDT

                                                      (and to ramble on)

                                                      ...before we become "Idiocracy"!

                                                        #4.7 - Sun Aug 5, 2012 1:19 AM EDT
                                                        Reply

                                                        It is always an issue of personal responsibility in the military, unless, that is, we are talking about senior field grade or flag officers. Then it is a matter of boys will be boys, nothing to see here, move along.

                                                        Thirty years ago, as a young airman stationed in the "Pearl of the Orient," I was once under the spotlight for a reprimand. The commander, let's call him Capt Nelson (because that was his name), was to consider the case over the weekend. Lucky for me I spotted Capt. Nelson on Saturday night off-base and outside a bar, leaning against the hood of his car, with a young local bar girl in his embrace (actually both of his hands were on her buttocks). So I took the opportunity to ask Capt. Nelson, if it was "a good time to discuss my case?" Capt. Nelson didn't like my impertinence and told me to move along. On Monday morning he told me that after great reflection my reprimand was being reduced to a mere letter of counseling. Such is the military. Discretion is the better part of valor, but it's also about who you know and who you can leverage.

                                                        • 9 votes
                                                        Reply#5 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 7:24 PM EDT

                                                        And this time it is the truth, the Colombian prostitute promises.

                                                        • 2 votes
                                                        Reply#6 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 7:28 PM EDT

                                                        This is news that's so old it looks like something left in the back of a refrigerator for a month.

                                                        However, if anyone thinks that supervisors, both military and secret service, knew nothing and didn't condone the actions, then I have ocean front property in Nebraska to sell.

                                                        • 5 votes
                                                        Reply#7 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 7:37 PM EDT

                                                        If it was not for beer and hookers there would be no economy outside of our military bases.....

                                                        Besides the military guys paid for theirs.......its the government agents who tried to be cheap and started this..

                                                        • 9 votes
                                                        Reply#8 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 7:47 PM EDT

                                                        So what exactly do bosses, or supervisors, or officers get paid more for? They arn't supposed to know what is going on? Bullfeathers. I spent some time in Vietnam and whenever anything went wrong the officers were mysteriously somewhere else. I wouldn't trust a carreer officer with latrine duty.

                                                        • 4 votes
                                                        Reply#9 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 7:49 PM EDT

                                                        Nice "white-wash" from the White House. Okay, it was the individuals fault, on that I agree, but somebody, yes somebody in a position of authority hired these guys, right? I guess they didn't read their full resume' with regard to personal integrity, etc. Oh, it seems as though this politically correct, liberally inclined, power structure in place currently didn't drop the ball on this one after all. Once again, WHO hired these birds? There is a chink in the armour. Fess up administration, @!$%# is lax.

                                                        • 3 votes
                                                        Reply#10 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 7:53 PM EDT

                                                        So this is all the president's fault right? Wrong! Obama does not handle the hiring or firing of military personnel. I can just about assure you that these people were there long before Obama stepped into the White House so you might want to blame a previous administration or the one before that.... Sorry just my opinion.

                                                        • 13 votes
                                                        #10.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 8:11 PM EDT

                                                        Sure Tiffani we can all Blame Bush..

                                                        • 5 votes
                                                        #10.2 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:03 PM EDT
                                                        Reply

                                                        despite all the bad news and scandals coming out of the military the past few years, it still gets a pass from the american public as a knight in shiny armor. unbelievable.

                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        Reply#11 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 8:10 PM EDT

                                                        Funny how there's no mention of Obama's admin. suing Ohio for letting the military vote early. Yep-the left just "loves" the military vote................

                                                        • 2 votes
                                                        Reply#12 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 8:29 PM EDT

                                                        That's actually incorrect, 13BVET. What happened is that military can vote within the last 3 days before the election and the regular Ohio civilian population cannot vote early after Friday before the election, scheduled for Tuesday. The challenge is to expand the final three days of early voting back to ALL Ohioans, just like the military. The military groups joining together to fight the lawsuit are also failing to understand the premise of the lawsuit.

                                                        Read it for yourself, right here:

                                                        http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/litigation/documents/ObamaforAmericavHustedcomplaint.pdf

                                                        • 7 votes
                                                        #12.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 8:51 PM EDT

                                                        Oh Hell, the left is in love with any vote they can get, be it dead, illegal or immoral.

                                                          #12.2 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:52 PM EDT

                                                          Oh Hell, the left is in love with any vote they can get, be it dead, illegal or immoral

                                                          I think you meant "The Right". With Romney as their nominee, they're going to need those dead, illegal, and immoral votes in order to win...

                                                            #12.3 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:18 PM EDT

                                                            actually either way we go we are screwed for the next four years.....neither one of the candidates running right now are worth a @!$%#....yes that means I will not be voting again only this time it is not because of being in iraq or afghan like before!

                                                              #12.4 - Thu Aug 9, 2012 12:29 PM EDT
                                                              Reply

                                                              Yes, and the superiors were never young.......... This is more like a comedy story...except they were trying to use their position to gain sex from possibly underage girls.... did anyone check "Ids" - Sad and sick!

                                                                Reply#13 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 8:31 PM EDT

                                                                Looks like obama found some more people to throw under the bus. Of Course MSNBC's reporting on the Secret Service was muted at best. Including their partying at Hyannis Port.

                                                                • 2 votes
                                                                Reply#14 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 8:39 PM EDT

                                                                PAV...are there ANY articles on here where you are not complaining about Obama? Jesus, Joseph and Mary!!....will you just STFU with that?!!

                                                                • 4 votes
                                                                #14.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:04 PM EDT
                                                                Reply

                                                                Since when is peon behavior not the fault of their commanding officers?

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                Reply#15 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 9:05 PM EDT

                                                                I am a realist with regards to the military, hookers and booze. So, excuding that, what concerns me the most is the "Ugly American" picture painted. These servce men have to realize that their behavior, not only reflects badly on us all as Americans, but, some of the actions in the ten years of this type, have cost civliian and fellow comrades lives. Having military dogs soil an exclusive hotel is wrong. Breaking cultural religious traditions in Muslin countries can cost military life. Or, better yet, make someone go over to the other side. Sick.

                                                                • 2 votes
                                                                Reply#16 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 9:32 PM EDT

                                                                But picking up hookers in Columbia is respecting their cultural traditions.

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                #16.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:14 PM EDT

                                                                But not ours!

                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                #16.2 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:54 PM EDT

                                                                Speak for yourself, kip. Prostitution is still legal in some areas of the U S. Legality aside, it is PRACTICED in pretty much every city, town, and village in this country of ours. Prostitution is about as traditional as breathing.

                                                                  #16.3 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 1:32 PM EDT
                                                                  Reply

                                                                  It does not escape my notice that while the military does not endorse prostitution, the actual prostitution that occured passed 6am of the morning in question is the only issue the military is really concerned about. What the military person decides to do on their own time (liberty call) is their own business. Security issues are related but that is a seperate issue, as are the other things the military is concerned about with this fiasco. Certainly, the actions of some of these individuals were not representative of the US military. These military personnel just happened to get caught up in a fiasco...and that never ends well.

                                                                  It makes me laugh when I see these puritans in outrage, so concerned about underage prostitutes. Are you serious going to blame military members if they end up with one? It is not like the military or anyone else goes out looking for someone underage...that I know of. It is these other countries, which often allow children as young as 12 to drink in their bars, or to loiter outside of them. Now if your next argument is going to switch to the hazards of alcohol use, I believe we already dealt with that issue back with prohibition, and your side lost...horribly. The UCMJ also has regulations that already deal with the use of alcohol.

                                                                  I am going to break with pack here. This thing was blown way out of proportion when it comes to military involvement. The military is just the easiest target, as they always are. I am not the only one who finds this entire thing an interesting, but predictable, development.

                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                  Reply#17 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 9:39 PM EDT

                                                                  It seems that the military does a lot more than not "endorse" prostitution, but it is against the UCMC-miss that part? As is adultry. Why shouldn't they face reprimand for their actions if they violated rules. And how on earth do you know who is and isn't "looking" or caring if a girl is underage? Finally, how did the servicemen meerily get "caught up in a fiasco" if they weren't actively involved? Seems you're trying every argument to absolve them of their actions. What about that whole idea of personal responsibility that everyone's always talking about?

                                                                  • 2 votes
                                                                  #17.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:46 PM EDT

                                                                  Back up a minute, Jed...I never said anything about someone not caring if the prostitute was underage. What I implied was that when servicemen go to a bar, sometime they get so drunk they can't see straight...and if a woman comes rubbing up on him....well, what is an underage person doing in a bar in the first place? Sometimes things happen...and no one is really wiser until later on. For the record, not one military person I have ever known, while I was active duty, had sex with anyone underage, nor did they have a personal interest of any kind. Heard stories of people on other ships, of course...but everyone has those, we called them foamies.

                                                                  There was this one time when we were in Greece. I went by this one bar...actually I was dragged along (seriously, I rarely drank alcohol while I was active) because every one else was there. Now I didn't see it, but I heard there was this one underage person, who was only exposed because HIS friends couldn't bear it anymore. Yeah...it was an underage trans sexual attempting to hit on drunk sailors. Fortunately, I heard no one was dumb enough nor drunk enough to fall for the adams apple.

                                                                  Ah, I see Jed, you think the only underage prostitutes are female....I see the problem.

                                                                  And no, I do not invent reasons to get people out of trouble. About the only thing you are correct about is that the UCMJ does have articles dealing with several things. However, I know of far more scandals involving spouses getting it on while their sweety is deployed or in a war zone than stories about prostitution involving active duty military. The UCMJ doesn't cover the spouse, though. hmmm.

                                                                    #17.2 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 2:09 AM EDT

                                                                    And you know the age that young teens can go to a bar in columbia?

                                                                      #17.3 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 1:28 PM EDT

                                                                      There was nothing wrong here except failure to pay and not taking better care of the dog. This should not be news. Also, we have no liberal media. It is all corporate or big money own.

                                                                      When did having sex become a crime or a reason to destroy someones career.

                                                                        #17.4 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 6:52 PM EDT
                                                                        Reply

                                                                        If their commander did not know what is going on with his troops then he shouldn't be their commander.

                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                        Reply#18 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 9:43 PM EDT

                                                                        Have you been a Commander BrokenTree?

                                                                          #18.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:00 PM EDT

                                                                          No, that isn't exactly right, the commanding officer has the buck stop with him or her. The command should have made it positively clear that anyone stepping out of line will be dealt with the hardest penalty. The command staff has to follow the same rules. The commander cannot and should not have to watch every move his people make, it's not his job. His job is to make sure orders are followed and his command is trained to do thier job.

                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                          #18.2 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:02 PM EDT

                                                                          Kip...your right, but also, a Commander set the atmosphere and culture for his unit.

                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                          #18.3 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:21 PM EDT

                                                                          The commander is responsible for insuring that his troops follow explicitly the 11th commandment; thou shalt not get caught!

                                                                            #18.4 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 1:28 PM EDT
                                                                            Reply
                                                                            Comment author avatarMichael Aufenkampvia Facebook

                                                                            F'n Duh?

                                                                            This is newsworthy, why?

                                                                            • 1 vote
                                                                            Reply#19 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:08 PM EDT

                                                                            Of course not, protect the officers and the service at all costs!

                                                                              Reply#20 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:18 PM EDT

                                                                              If these were young troops or maybe even junior NCOs that did this - no, not even junior NCOs. The Service Members I have seen listed in this case were people with rank levels that indicated they had "been around" awhile. I had 28 years in before I retired - E1 to O4 - so I know what I am talking about here.
                                                                              When you get that certificate that say The President of the United States...has trust in your honor and fidelity..." it MEANS something. If you choose to violate that trust, well, then you deserve to have the book thrown at you. And these are Navy and Marines - they KNOW what "Rocks and Shoals" are - they don't read those to them in Boot Camp and OTS anymore?

                                                                                Reply#21 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:26 PM EDT

                                                                                Hey OSO- You are lost. I can see why you stayed in the service. I do not think the military men called the shot at all. Who is easier t blame, the Secret Service or service people? Obviously the Secret Service "the elite" never screw up. B>S> My money says Secret Svc and the boy and girls in the service followed suit. No one will ever admit that though. Thanks.

                                                                                  #21.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:56 PM EDT

                                                                                  Two seperate issues here, each side was not doin it right, but not together.

                                                                                    #21.2 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:07 PM EDT

                                                                                    Both the SS and military screwed up literally including their supervisors that were involved. No free passes here, it's bye bye time.

                                                                                      #21.3 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 11:44 AM EDT
                                                                                      Reply

                                                                                      Baby killers. All. Jar Heads. Hang em. Wait. UCMJ prohibits prostitution? I would like to know the article.

                                                                                      What at story if that were true. 98% of the military Courts Martialed. In Korea, the US Army ran a brothel? Get real folkies.

                                                                                        Reply#22 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:44 PM EDT

                                                                                        No, but Marines do kill a lot of baby killers. Kind of a hobby of theirs.

                                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                                        #22.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:59 PM EDT

                                                                                        Somebody must be butthurt the recruiter rejected him.......

                                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                                        #22.2 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:09 PM EDT
                                                                                        Reply

                                                                                        So much for the type "A" personality Warfighters that do great things on the battle field but their heroism is washed out by a bunch of morality police. There was a saying in Special Operations when I served in SMUs in the Army for 23 years; you can have the greatest warriors; SEALS, Rangers, and other special units, but to keep most men of that type happy and on your side, there must be some tolerance to drinking and tail chasing. Otherwise your just going to have a Squadron/ team/ platoon of choir boys who only want to work 40 hour weeks; but you'll see them in church... but they will be the best in the eyes of this judgmental politically correct intolerable morality police society we are turning into.

                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                        Reply#23 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:55 PM EDT

                                                                                        Sure, Scienceguy, every army needs a few cutthroat s.o.b.'s. It also needs a few top commanders who know better than to send such types to an international conference where they will represent the United States of America. Or if we're so short of dog handlers and bomb sniffers we have to send them, then the junior officers who go with them must be briefed to 1) watch those soldiers closely, and 2) refrain from going off on a binge themselves.

                                                                                        If the officers have done the second but not the first, then they should at least lose command.

                                                                                          #23.1 - Sat Aug 4, 2012 12:56 PM EDT
                                                                                          Reply

                                                                                          You're correct that each individual is responsible for their own personal behavior. But, what you don't understand is that in the military, the "commander" is responsible when their underlings get caught with their fingers in the cookie jar. This is the way it works and the military looks at this kind of thing and sees it as "the commander can't control his/her soldiers."

                                                                                          As a detachment commander, one of my husband's the lieutenants decided to drive his car after a few beers. He hit a brick wall (wasn't hurt), the German police came, they didn't do a blood test for 2 hours and by then his BAC was below illegal levels.

                                                                                          Five hours later, the 2LT called my husband (in the middle of the night - which either means someone died or there's trouble at the detachment) to tell him what he had done. I can't write here what my husband said....just use your imagination and then make it 10 times worse.

                                                                                          As soon as my husband got off the phone with the 2LT, he had to call the Colonel - in the middle of the night, which means that the colonel was not just mad, he was really, really mad. I remember what my husband said and the last words out of his mouth were, "I want this lieutenant out of my command now."

                                                                                          The 2LT did leave but not for a month. And during that month - in fact, within a few days, the 2LT became a 1LT. There was nothing my husband could have done to stop the promotion as 2LT to 1LT is automatic in the Army. I remember all the soldiers standing in formation as the 2Lt got promoted and I wanted to PUKE!

                                                                                          We're all personally responsible for the stupid choices that we make in our lives, but the rules are differentif you're in the military and your your soldiers make stupid choices. No, it probably doesn't seem fair, but it is what it is.

                                                                                            Reply#24 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:56 PM EDT

                                                                                            Yes..but something like this is not a show stopper. Thats why Article 134 of UCMJ is such BS. Its a subjective article. You get a church going Commander and he feels what you did was Biblically wrong and he fries the Soldier. You get a party going Commander in the same case and he gives you a high five. Its BS, its subjective, and its BS.

                                                                                            Even DUIs (Drinking Driving) is Article 134. Some Soldiers lose rank, others get a pat on the back. BS BS BS. Prostitution is under Article 134. Article 134 is the catch all clause for anything the Command "FEELS" is not morally or Ethically correct. But the standard is not defined. For a Libertarian like me, a formal Commander, I feel the Government does not belong in peoples bedrooms, for a Evangelical Commander- the Soldier is toast. No Standard!

                                                                                            • 3 votes
                                                                                            #24.1 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 11:07 PM EDT
                                                                                            Reply

                                                                                            We the American People Demand to Know:

                                                                                            Who did he hump and when did he hump it?

                                                                                              Reply#25 - Fri Aug 3, 2012 10:57 PM EDT
                                                                                              Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
                                                                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.