Calif. sues major veterans charity for millions, alleges fraud and self-dealing

California's attorney general sued a major veterans charity on Thursday, accusing the officers and directors of engaging in self-dealing and fraudulent fundraising, and paying excessive compensation.

The suit seeks to remove the officers and recover $4.3 million that it claims was improperly diverted from Help Hospitalized Veterans. The charity in Winchester, Calif., was founded in 1971 to provide therapeutic arts and craft activities for patients receiving care in Veterans Affairs hospitals, military hospitals and state veterans homes, according to its website.


"What makes this case so egregious is our military servicemen and women are willing to sacrifice their lives for our country and for us as Americans, and when they are in need of help and support we should give it to them and not manipulate charitable people and then personally profit from them," state Attorney General Kamala D. Harris told The Associated Press.

The charity raised more than $108 million in contributions over the last three years, it said in tax filings and on its website, with 33.8 percent going toward its programs. The suit alleges that it filed "false and misleading" tax returns that inflated program expenses and reduced its actual fundraising costs to "less than 30 percent."

Afghan suicide bomber kills senior Army leader, 2 majors

Based on its reported fundraising, Help Hospitalized Veterans ranks among the top 1 percent of charities in the United States. The group once was endorsed by retired Gen. Tommy Franks, who later distanced himself from the charity.

At the same time, it has ranked for more than a decade at the bottom of lists by watchdog groups that rate nonprofit organizations based on their financial management and abilities to use most of their donations toward their causes. CharityWatch says about 35 percent of Help Hospitalized Veterans' funds go toward programs to aid veterans. The recommended standard is about 65 percent.

On a mission: Jogging across the US in name of veterans

The California lawsuit said the charity's president, Michael Lynch, received excessive compensation of $900,000.

The complaint said that former president Roger Chapin, who during a 2008 U.S. congressional hearing about his management of the charity called himself the "the most honest person in this room," retired the following year with a nearly $2 million pension plan. The suit alleges that the group's board members retroactively spiked Chapin's earnings to justify the inflated amount for his retirement.

Social impact investing catches on in the US

Chapin is also accused of diverting the charity's funds through a separate charity called Conquer Cancer and Alzheimer's Now.

Chapin was accused of paying himself more than $493,000 from the cancer charity. That charity received the money from American Target Advertising, a fund-raising firm run by conservative political fundraiser Richard Viguerie, who is not named in the suit.

More charity news in NBCNews.com's Giving section

'It's surprising it's taken this long'
Viguerie, who is identified in the suit as Chapin's long-time friend, is said to have deposited funds into the account of Conquer Cancer and Alzheimer's Now from $800,000 that Help Hospitalized Veterans had lent ATA and was not repaid.

"It's surprising it's taken this long for something to happen with all the serious problems that were brought up in the (2008 congressional) hearing," said Daniel Borochoff of CharityWatch, which monitors the financial records of nonprofit groups. "What's more, this information did not filter down to donors."

But he added: "Mr. Chapin spun a complex web to confuse well-intentioned donors and make it difficult for regulators to untangle."

Afghan officials: 3 US special forces troops slain

Calls to Help Hospitalized Veterans and Lynch's office were not returned. Viguerie did not immediately respond to phone and email messages seeking comment. Reuters was unable to contact Chapin on Thursday evening.

Borochoff said the complaint sends a strong message to unscrupulous charities.

"It's about $2 billion that is raised on behalf of veterans charity, and unfortunately a lot of that's being wasted and not being used to help our veterans," Borochoff said. "It's really ludicrous what's going on. It's out of control, there's such great waste. It's a national disgrace that people are allowed to exploit veterans for their own personal financial benefit, or benefit of their company."

More Southern California coverage from NBCLosAngeles.com

According to Charity Navigator, a third of the 50 military veterans charities it evaluates rate poorly and 20 percent either got a zero for their financial management or a "donor advisory" tag, which indicates the organizations are being investigated by authorities.

That compares to 2 percent for other kinds of charities, said Ken Berger, the president of the Washington-based group that evaluates 5,500 charities.

Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 8

Nothing like a "good cause" to make a few people rich. Even as a veteran myself, I will not be shamed into giving to these types organizations. When I am ready to donate to a good cause, I'll cut the middle man and give it to those that need it.

  • 43 votes
#1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:18 AM EDT

Salvation Army is the only agency that I will ever donate to.

Another sad part about this story is how many servicemen and women are discarded after they have served.

  • 43 votes
#1.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:31 AM EDT

I don't know the specifics or if they actually did engage in fraud, but who is California to determine what is "excessive" compensation? Also, will California get a cut of the money if successful, or will it rightfully go back to the donors or intended recipients of the money? I hope these questions get asked by a semi-decent reporter.

  • 20 votes
#1.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:56 AM EDT

The Salvation Army is about the only you can trust.

  • 19 votes
#1.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:41 AM EDT

The California lawsuit said the charity's president, Michael Lynch, received excessive compensation of $900,000.

Kind of like CEOS that receive excessive compensation. What a disgrace. I hope california wins the lawsuit, but the state should not get 1 penny from it. The judge needs to give the $ back to where it belongs.

As for the salvation army.. They need to be cut off from any local/state, or federal government support. They'll never get another penny of my money.

http://www.prosebeforehos.com/cultural-correspondent/12/07/why-the-salvation-army-doesnt-deserve-your-money/

  • 9 votes
#1.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:16 AM EDT

Charity is a business. The purpose of a business is to make money, the more the better. Veterans should not have to beg for care from charities, it should be provided by the government.

The Salvation Army seems to have, year after year, the best record of giving back and donated dollars and fewer scandals than most others.

  • 14 votes
#1.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:22 AM EDT
Comment author avatargetoveryourself12Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Is there anything about this country you support

  • 2 votes
#1.7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:27 AM EDT

A dishonest Charity...I don't believe it! /sarc

  • 9 votes
#1.8 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:30 AM EDT

Those who use the debt that Americans feel towards our service members to enrich themselves through these veterans charity scams deserve to receive the harshest punishment the law allows. With all that our veterans have sacrificed for this country those that take advantage of them are truly the lowest of the low. Not only should these people lose their ill gotten gains, they should get prison time for fraud.

  • 28 votes
#1.9 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:37 AM EDT

Like to see them go after the Wounded Warrior Project which is nothing but a well polished scam. Millions and millions on fancy TV ads, mail outs and nothing to help wounded warriors despite WWP's claims.

  • 11 votes
#1.10 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:06 AM EDT

Based on its reported fundraising, Help Hospitalized Veterans ranks among the top 1 percent of charities in the United States.

There's that "1%" again!

  • 11 votes
#1.11 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:28 AM EDT

Salvation Army, after Katrina hit, they were first on the ground, they had trucks lined up , along with WALMART, they had water and food waiting to get into New Orleans, the Governor stopped them, said she wanted to lock down new Orleans, the Salvation army is the best help organization in the country.

as for the fines of the thieves from the veterans organization, any fines paid will be known as CY-Pres, it will go to like organizations after costs are deducted by the State of California.

  • 5 votes
#1.12 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:56 AM EDT

I have learned to donate to my local charities. There is too much corporate pay in the large charities. The Susan B Komen organization is a great example of more money going to pay the people at the top than to find a cure.

  • 13 votes
#1.14 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:08 AM EDT

myspellcheckerisbroken Very good thoughts. But if the state wins this lawsuit, rather than having the money go back to the original donors, I hope it ALL goes to the intended recipients.

But I agree wholeheartedly with your thoughts about CA. This state has so much financial corruption (the city of BELL and others) that the state attorney general and the state treasurer should be devoting as much time as possible looking into where and how money is spent/wasted in CA.

Anytime there is the abitlity to garner money without specific notification of allotment of the funds there will be corruption. This is one case.

There was almost another financial tragedy in CA when a committee recently tried to add a $1 per pack tax on cigarettes on the last election ballot. Thankfully it failed. The supporters/authors of the bill said it was for cancer research. But in the measure the committee was trying to get this money without any specific dollar percentage going toward cancer research. The measure failed in a very close vote. The problem with bills like this is that people target certain groups to pay for others to have cushy jobs without any accountability. The tax would be held in force until 2015. The money could be spent on anything they wanted in or out of the state. The money could have been used to add as money people to administer the program as they wanted. Had that bill measure passed, what group of people would be targeted next? This type of action just like the Veterans groups mentioned in this article wreaks of corruption/fraud.

  • 5 votes
#1.15 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:21 AM EDT

Meanwhile,

The Federal government retains 75% of every tax dollar spent for admin fees.

Certainly the State of California has a problem of sticky fingers too, I'm pretty sure that 65% of every tax dollar it collects doesn't make it back out the door in services.

Mr. Pot and Mr. Kettle have little room to argue!

  • 6 votes
#1.16 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:30 AM EDT

The complaint said that former president Roger Chapin, who during a 2008 U.S. congressional hearing about his management of the charity called himself the "the most honest person in this room,"...

He's probably correct.

  • 7 votes
#1.17 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:46 AM EDT

America??? Support people who will work for a living!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Do not support those who stand in line for freebies!!!! We are a nation that works for a living and those e who stand in line will ruin our US!!!!!

  • 3 votes
#1.18 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:51 AM EDT

The Salvation Army, is NOT a veterans group. Salvation, as in religion. Army, as in God's army.

  • 4 votes
#1.19 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:11 PM EDT

Is Goodwill not as good as the Salvation Army?

  • 1 vote
#1.20 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:30 PM EDT

Sounds like the American Red Cross during 911. Sad!

  • 2 votes
#1.21 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:03 PM EDT

@ TeaParty

One minute you Liberals claim Fox News can't be trusted...the next minute it's the gold standard for information.

Take that logic...bwahhhahhhhahhaaa.

  • 7 votes
#1.22 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:39 PM EDT

LIBS

  • 1 vote
#1.23 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:52 PM EDT

What does having liberal or conservative ideals have to do with the general and blatant greed and corruption of mankind?

What a waste of breath.

  • 5 votes
#1.24 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:45 PM EDT
Comment author avatarKeith Brackettvia Facebook

Fox News print can usually be trusted since they can be held responsible for anything they print as news. Show's like Hannity's and Beck's old one couldn't be trusted because they were always able to claim it was solely entertainment and weren't held responsible. Conservative's problems were they always quoted Fox shows as fact when 99% of other news sources called it a lie.

  • 2 votes
#1.25 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:12 PM EDT

Now we are all learning where charity begins and ends at. The people running charities are cons. I have been trying to get assistance for a guy that is severely burned worse than me, and he needs a car or van with auto doors, auto ignition start as well. I have contacted every agency out there from the Catholic Charities, Good Will, and the Salvation Army, and they all have sent back emails saying "Sorry" but we do not help in those areas.

However, Catholic Charities does sponsor illegals in their legal fees and helping them become legal citizens in the USA.

I guess we all know why there are so many homeless Vets in CA today. The people that are suppose to be helping them are using them for their own selfish gains and profits, and each and every one of these mudderfudders need to be tossed in jail for 20 years for fraud and deception of the people.

  • 1 vote
#1.26 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:25 PM EDT

I'm not surprised but find it scandalous nonetheless. These scam artists deserve some serious jail time. I do not believe, however, that this is the only "charity" where top management gets extravagant salaries and benefits and where only a small percentage goes to the actual programs (in my book, 33.8% is lousy). I bet the same goes for some non-profit organizations. Before giving, check out the charity online. You can check how much is spent on programs, administration, advertising, CEO salary, etc. To Richard #1.18, let's hope you never need a helping hand. Would you tell the people who recently lost everything to fires, for instance, to "forget it Charlie, just get a job?"

  • 1 vote
#1.27 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:47 PM EDT

Claiming to be the most honest person in the room during a congressional hearing still isnt saying much.

    #1.28 - Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:43 AM EDT

    About two years ago I got caught up in their scam... What made me feel bad is the vets were being used...

      #1.29 - Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:51 AM EDT
      Reply

      Forbes magazine reports the top charity groups profit ratio. 50% toward the administrative cost, up to

      90%. I ain't givin' no more.

      • 17 votes
      Reply#2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:25 AM EDT

      I stopped years ago, after the scandal with United Way's top exec living like a Saudi prince on the charity's dime.

      • 26 votes
      #2.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:56 AM EDT

      Same here. I give my donations to local charities that do not have that overhead. Make no mistake though, charities are businesses and act like a business too.

      • 9 votes
      #2.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:41 AM EDT

      United Way isn't a really a charity, it's just another tax.

      • 6 votes
      #2.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:42 AM EDT

      nosferatu-499026

      United Way isn't a really a charity, it's just another tax.

      One of my employers used to beat the hell out of us until we donated to United. They get big tax breaks based on how much money they earn for United. I hated that time of year.

      • 4 votes
      #2.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:28 AM EDT

      jdmbo3, that is illegal and you should still point out that was done to your state labor board.

      • 3 votes
      #2.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:34 PM EDT
      Reply

      The real shame is of course the need for private charities to help veterans. These men and women were injured in the service of their country and this country should provide everything they need. Make congress take care of them instead of taking care of their rich campaign donors.

      • 24 votes
      Reply#3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:30 AM EDT

      Rick-911527:

      Your point about congress making sure vets are taken care of has been an issue since WW1. I would like to see it happen also.

      • 5 votes
      #3.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:40 AM EDT

      Yet part of the government has determined that the V.A. is a waste of money!

      • 4 votes
      #3.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:04 PM EDT

      The VA is just another shoddy run gov agency....name an agency that has run efficiently and affectively without fraud and waste?

      • 3 votes
      #3.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:15 PM EDT

      The S.E.C., the D.E.A., the N.R.C., the list goes on and on. But this is just the view of someone in government, not my personal view.

      • 1 vote
      #3.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 2:52 PM EDT
      Reply

      People are despicable. I have never trusted most veterans charitys. I donate to just one, that I know I can trust.

      These people should be jailed, not just sued.

      • 20 votes
      Reply#4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:36 AM EDT

      If there was a bigger crack down of all charities i think you would see how many thieving bastards are out there. It's a shame and there should be a punishment that fits the crime. Death would get my vote.

      • 9 votes
      Reply#5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 6:45 AM EDT

      The American government sends its soldiers to meaningless wars in distance land. If the soldier survives in one piece, he come back home only to find himself unemployed. If he comes back wounded, 'Veteran Charity' organizations are there to exploit him. Back at home-sweet-home, too many veterans end up being killed by gangs, criminals, cops, or drugs. And if he tells the VA doctors he's suffering depression or psychological effects from Agent Orange, or other neurologic agents, the doctors tell him it's all in his head as post-combat syndrome.

      As for the American veteran, if the combat fails to kill him or drives him insane, living in America will.

      • 20 votes
      Reply#6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:00 AM EDT

      Spoken like a true anti-American who never served and will never even meet anyone who did since they wouldn't be allowed in your Progressive Ivy Tower.

      • 7 votes
      #6.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:14 AM EDT

      Wall, baloney, your Post is truly full of elephant patoots. My Dad, is 92 and WWII & Korea Vet, my husband is a 3 tour Viet Nam Vet, the care they both receive by the Veterans Administration is very good, I've never seen a Vet. disrespected in any manner. I'll grant the Agent Orange had some merit, but not today, it is widely recognized for the toxic spray that it is and was. My problem is with the private employers whom won't hire veterans as if they are some how damaged goods. Unconscionable attitude, we want our service people to protect us but somehow there is a stigma attached for service. For a Charity to only allocate 38% of contributions to fund their programs is disgraceful while administrators are awarded the bulk of the contributions. I understand administrative costs and people don't work for free but when nearly 70% of donated funds go to a select few I find it disgraceful.

      • 15 votes
      #6.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:12 AM EDT

      Wall, what are you personally willing to give up to care for disabled vets?

      • 5 votes
      #6.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:36 AM EDT

      sky, wouldn't not hiring vets cause they are "damaged goods" be disrespecting a vet?

      • 5 votes
      #6.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:06 AM EDT
      Ken WulfDeleted

      Sky - Your statement is spoken like a true military brat. I served my time and I know how most (not all) military wives act. The attitude they have is disgusting to say the least.

      You are basing a wide spread problem off of your narrow experience with the military. People hate to hire veterans. The VA is unable to give proper treatment on a lot of injuries. TriCare stops paying for a lot of active military at a certain point if the care for them or their family is "too expensive".

      The government hides and denies the effects of various munitions used. Along with materials soldiers come in contact with during deployments. You mention "Agent Orange" but you seem to have forgotten the Rangers returning from Desert Storm with symptoms of nonspecific nerve agent exposure. Maybe you've just forgot because you don't know any Rangers. I do, 75th 2nd Bn. I was a batt boy and had plenty of contact with these ancient Rangers who have seen more hell than I can fathom.

      Shall we begin to speak of the heavy metal poisoning from the inhalation of uranium dust spread in the air after a Warthog strafes a couple times. To add to that, uranium munitions like to catch on fire on impact - so even more is put into the air. Then again, the Warthog isn't the only thing that fires uranium rounds. The jockey that was torn in half by the round isn't the only person there it effects.

      This can go on and on. You type your incorrect 'facts' all you want but the end truth is: you're a spouse. Not a soldier. So you have no idea what really happens. We keep more from you than you think because we have too much pride and dignity to complain about most things. However, it's coming to and end it seems.

      • 2 votes
      #6.6 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:00 PM EDT

      Jeff-1570172 and skyparrot, either you are lying for some reason; or you have not gone to very many V.A.'s; or you have not gone to very many departments within the V.A. you attend. Yes, some veterans get all of the care they need, for years and years.

      But the sad fact is, and even sadder because of the denial of the fact, is all of the veterans that slip through the cracks. If you were wiser, you would remember the abysmal national statistics on suicide.

      • 1 vote
      #6.7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:16 PM EDT

      my father passed at home in feb 11 last year.I helped ith him fulltime about 2005.the va is very vague on what it thinks is a help.``between 3hrs 5x aday with gofer assist.and medicare about the same,little less you still must stay on top of them like a kid.not properly trained,some are unreliable,atleast one is in jail due to child molestation after 2yr investigation.got 1oyrs.his spouse was in iraq at time.my mentality became like trained for 25yr ago.you will help and aid,and no bull@!$%# or pay the consiquinces.had a va rep visit once trying to defend the caregivers work.after she was told we asked that person to leave afterturning her back on my dad allowing him to slip and hurt himdelf in shower.i begged her to take us to court so a judge could hear this.point is,charity still starts at home.for any vet,if they can still remember and are capable,its always leave no one behind over there,leave no vet behind when you back and more capable.thats the best and most efficient charity i have seen since my departure in 1988.

      • 1 vote
      #6.8 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:29 PM EDT

      JOHN DOE:

      I am reading all of the horror stories and I take you all at your word. I was surprised about what you said about TriCare. They were one of the only insurances that had no lifetime limit on benefits long before it was law.

      My wife was told 17 years ago that she had 6 months. She's still here. I handle the paperwork. On several occasions I've had to fight. In jumping through the hoops, I always remain respectful and put my ducks in a row, and do and provide the information they ask in a timely manner.

      I have been told by many tricare representatives that it is a pleasure to deal with an upset beneficiary who doesn't yell and cuss at them. Staying calm and respectful has gotten reps to go above and beyond to help me. I start out by telling them I need their help, make them feel like they are truely appreciated, and always thank them for their help. On occasion, I have written letters to supervisors praising the rep for the service I got.

      Sometimes I deal with a rep who starts out being short and curt. We all have, huh? When that happens, I stop and tell them I can tell they are having a frustrating day. I get them talking. It seldom fails to totally change their attitude. Usually it's because they've dealt with a difficult customer. In cases like that, I know they are willing to be helpful because I took the time to listen to them.

      I could go on and on about remembering to treat them as I want to be treated.

      To address the idea of treatment being too expensive. I keep track of the EOB'S, AND GO OVER EACH ONE. On occasion, I have called them to tell them that an item on the EOB was not a provided service and contact the provider to get documentation they need. The biggie is double billing. I feel as much as I am deserving of the benefits, I should help verify the claims are correct. And they do appreciate itTrHere is the shocker and most of you won't believe this.

      Here is the shocker you won't believe. Charges billed to Tricare by providers over the years: $13,550,000. Tricare allowed $10,213,000. Knowing that our medical expenses are outrageous....I worked jobs after retirement based on good medical benefits more than pay.

      Duo insurance and tricare standard allow us to pick our providers. We avoid VA and Tricare providers whenever possible. Lets face it. Personnel levels at VA medical are less than half what's needed.

      I spend far more time than I would like getting services approved. In light of above numbers I believe it is time well spent.

      When I look at it like the money I save by getting approval for treatments, is the best paying job I ever had.

      • 1 vote
      #6.9 - Sat Aug 11, 2012 12:41 AM EDT
      Reply

      another story about greed, fat cats lining there on pockets in the name of charities. I'm glad they got caught, now, where's the money?????????? SGT. Brown Vietnam Veteran

      • 11 votes
      Reply#7 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:02 AM EDT

      Right, men and women of this country serve to get nothing back, and the underline of this story is it wouldn't be brought up if the California government wasn't wanting a piece of the pie for themselves

      • 5 votes
      #7.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:29 AM EDT

      They should do what insurers are required to do under Obamacare. Require them to spend 85% on services for the charity they raise funds for.

      • 7 votes
      #7.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:28 AM EDT
      Reply

      PT Barnum said, "There's a fool born every minute, and two to take him." These disgusting scammers should be put into a uniform, given a rifle with one bullet, and sent into the front lines as cannon fodder.

      And it isn't only veterans that are being used by these scammers -- firefighters, police, EMTs -- all of them have some "charity" out there claiming to help them, but in fact lining their own pockets with the profits of their fundraising. Disgusting.

      • 12 votes
      Reply#8 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:10 AM EDT

      I really hate those type of police / fireman charities. When I ask the person on the phone if he is a volunteer or paid its always paid, so right then anyone should know just a fraction of what you send is given to the police or fireman, most goes to whoever organized that charity.

      • 7 votes
      #8.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:45 AM EDT

      Once, a local sheriff organization more or less coerced (by telephone) my then 14-year-old son into promising to send money. I called them up, informed them they were talking to a kid and they wouldn't get one penny from me -- ever.

      • 2 votes
      #8.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:34 AM EDT
      Reply

      I would have never suspected that this charity was stealoing from those that gave so much.

      Those that are guilty need to face criminal charges and be put away for a long time.

      This can be expecter when ther is no oversite within the organization.

      I am a member of two veterans organizations and I would never dream of stealing from any one of them.

      I worked as a service officer in one of them . I paid money of my own pocket to furnish a computer and supplys. I never took a dime. I also pay my own way to confrences and meetings.

      • 10 votes
      Reply#9 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:10 AM EDT

      It's takes a foul-ball POS to ride the coat tails of a charity for their own, personal enrichment. Most of my experience with charities, people volunteered their time and recources. This is despicable.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#10 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:16 AM EDT

      there's too many people who don't have enough money or time to donate. the ones who have enough money and time don't care cause their families are wealthy enough to have never had a vet in them.

      • 2 votes
      #10.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:08 AM EDT
      Reply

      I reached the point in the article where our veterans weren't getting 95% of the money and stopped reading this. This country has a way of busting or troops in the chops every two weeks. This disrespect has been going on forever, my grandfather survived Pearl Harbor aboard ship and the rest of the war, then survived 25 years with emphysema all the while caring for us. The most get up and go man ever, and wouldn't tell a lie to save his life, and what did he get? The run around. They make my 70 yr old friend sit in a bureaucratic hell what gives the DMV a run for it's money in terms of agony, and what does he get for being 101st Airborne Korea black veteran decorated? The mushroom treatment.

      Isn't there a criminal law to ghetto stomp all these leeches? There has to be some ol' forgotten colonial law we forgot that sentences tar and feathering and exile. See this is why slavery can be beneficial. We can sell them to dig graves of soldiers and veterans with the last one being their own. We could turn the 7 gun salute into their... Ok I quit.

      This is why God made flames in hell. (IDC antithiest).

      • 8 votes
      Reply#11 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:24 AM EDT

      I give to the Salvation Army or charities that I check out through charitynavigator(dot)org that meet my criteria of 85-95% going to their activities - not to the self-serving managers. I believe in volunteerism. It does several things:

      1) Provides a needed service for others and gives the volunteer a feeling of self-worth.

      2) Should you need to get a job, volunteerism looks great on your resume, if not, volunteerism gives you something worthwhile to do in retirement (see item #1).

      It is obvious to me that charitable groups spending 40+% on management are not cost effective nor volunteer based and I will NEVER give to them or ANYONE who calls my phone for the purpose of soliciting funds or work. According to Federal Law, charitable and political organizations can call me but I don't have to talk to them and I WILL NEVER give to them... take me off your list.

      • 5 votes
      Reply#12 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:26 AM EDT

      While the Salvation Army does good work, they are also an example of a fleecing of America. There are many people in the organization that make way too much money. The Salvation Army also does NOT have to submit IRS documents in regard to how they spend their money because they are classified as a church. So who knows the percentage of your dollar that actually goes to helping people.

      In 2010 here in Tampa, it was revealed that a Hillsborough County Commissioner was being paid $92,000/yr as a county commissioner. And he also worked for the Salvation Army making an additional $95,000/yr. According to the Salvation Army the guy helps with fundraising, development and is a liaison to local and state governments. But they refused to release any records showing specifically what he does or when he works, saying such records of the non-profit are protected by federal law. The higher up personnel at the Salvation Army bring home wages that would be considered exceptional in most businesses. Is it really fair that the donors feel they are helping people when in fact it is padding the pockets of a few?

      Here's the article...
      http://www2.tbo.com/news/breaking-news/2010/aug/20/normans-jobs-at-county-salvation-army-raise-questi-ar-38122/

      The Salvation Army needs to come clean and release the records of paid employees (like other charities) and a donation/ expense report. And they should be required to do so every year!

      • 9 votes
      #12.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:01 AM EDT

      I once worked for the Salvation Army as a truck driver. The services that were offered for chemical dependency was housing and counceling. Food was paid for by pooling all the clients food stamp allocations and lots of food is donated by local stores who feel charitable. Clothes and other items are donated and sold in stores tended by non paid clients. Counceling is attending AA meetings that are held off site. Housing was and still is in an old donated factory that was retrofitted to house the organisation. Paid employees get nothing more than minimum wage, to a skilled truck driver this is insulting. I had a little moment of benevolence when I took the job but that ended soon afterwards. This Army of Salvation is just another charity scam, it's called stealing in the name of the Lord

        #12.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 3:21 PM EDT

        Sammy-1287596, #12- Ever heard of the "FALSIFIED RECORDS", "FALSIFIED SPUN-RECORD KEEPING" and the "DECEPTIVE-DATA-SPIN-MARKETING" that produces that supposed 85 and 95% accounting? BS- "Bait and Switch". IT'S ALL FRAUD. AND "ALL" FRAUD IS ILLEGAL. (and that poor Bastard, Bernie, is the only one put away for 3 hundred and some years!)

        Do you really think you can trust anything? That there is really any "credibility" as a necessity to "Trust" out there in even one area or section of The Marketplace, on this day, August 10, 2012???

        • 1 vote
        #12.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 5:00 PM EDT
        Reply

        Cali...sueing a charity for fruad, they should sue themselves for fruad they been doing it for years.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#13 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:39 AM EDT

        "Fruad"? Not once, but twice!

        • 4 votes
        #13.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:00 AM EDT

        lee, spell check please, fraud?

        • 2 votes
        #13.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:17 AM EDT
        Ken WulfDeleted

        Ken, Spoken like a true liberal commie living in his parents basement. Wouldn't know the first thing about the military and would come home crying after one day in boot camp. Go suck on your progressive pacifier and let the real adults handle the work. Scumbag.

        • 1 vote
        #13.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:21 PM EDT

        Gotta laugh at Ken. Ranger school, HA! I went to Ranger School. It's a leadership school. Drop your sorry butt off, give you a task and you're expected to figure out how to do it.

        RIP (aka. RASP now) is where the real action happens. You want to be a Ranger, you get an option 40 when you sign up or hope you get sent to the 75th later, got through RIP, get placed in the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd Bn. Continue to train, crap out your insides, train some more, get deployed, kick some jockey in the head, go back and train some more because you still suck as far as regiment is concerned.

        You want to be a leader? Go to Ranger school, get a tab, wear it like a bada**, never do anything with it.

        Yes, you can be a 'Ranger-Ranger' however, since all Rangers are expected to go through Ranger school eventually most just wear the Ranger patch without the tab.

        • 1 vote
        #13.5 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:24 PM EDT
        Reply

        Charities are big business these days, wished the IRS would tighten up on its definition of a charity where the expenses of the charity were at 10% or less in country and 20% out of country. I see a lot of charities that meet these numbers, anything less is either badly run, over maned or over compensated.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#14 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:40 AM EDT

        I remember when the USO was under investigation so NOTHING and I mean NOTHING would surprise me let the chips fall where they might.

        • 7 votes
        Reply#15 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:49 AM EDT

        108 million dollars raised for arts and crafts projects?

        Couldn't people find a better charity to contribute to?

        • 4 votes
        Reply#16 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:52 AM EDT

        I prefer to donate money to the Unemployed Investment Bankers Benevolent Fund.

        • 2 votes
        #16.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:03 AM EDT

        Arts and Crafts are primarily used for Occupational therapy, hand eye coordination etc., especially good for brain damaged patients, brain traumas of all sorts, IED's, strokes, etc. Don't dismiss the value of the arts and crafts, but the Charity, Help Hospitalized Vets, conduct is despicable. Karma is a nasty beast, how about some jail time!

        • 5 votes
        #16.2 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:26 AM EDT
        Reply

        Square dude - And tighten up the definition of a church. They don't have the balls to go after the big guys unless it is after a 5 year investigation where it costs more to investigate then the people are stealing. But, what the hell do I know.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#17 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:52 AM EDT

        Actually, the story is nothing new. This stuff has been investigated over the years of the major charity organizations. Almost all of them, with the exception of the Salvation Army, have private jets, limos with full bar, fly to foreign countries and have extravagant gatherings. When pressed about this in the past, they said they have to have to entertain large donors, dignitaries and the like. They get good sized salaries and live high-on-the-hog from donated money. If I were a sizable donor and they showed me how they were spending the money, even if it were on me, I'd have to take a step back and say wait a minute. This is how my money is being used? Their argument on this doesn't really hold water.

        • 4 votes
        Reply#18 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 7:53 AM EDT

        Send these SOB's up to the old Stony Lonesome, where they'll get some good prison love they so sorely need.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#19 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:03 AM EDT

        Isn't this whats capitalism is all about making as much money as you can anyway you can. Obama was right the US is not a Christian nation it is a greedy nation, one nation under money for money with liberty and justice for those who can make the most any way they can. Money bless America the best government that money can buy, now go to the polls and vote them money makers back in until we become another third world country with only the rich overlords and the poor slave class .

        • 7 votes
        Reply#20 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:07 AM EDT

        wow

        • 1 vote
        Reply#21 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:13 AM EDT

        Giving to large charities is a big mistake. (Including breast cancer charities). The best thing to do is to really give a vet a hand. Go down and volunteer at the VA and listen and help the guys that need help. Donate to your local woman's shelter, if you get a waitress that looks like she's struggling then give her a $100 tip, tip the motel maids generously, and give generously to the local food drives, and give (and volunteer) at the homeless shelters.

        There are a lot of people and places and ways to help that are not going to go to someone's house that is a whole lot bigger than yours.

        • 6 votes
        Reply#22 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:19 AM EDT

        All of these so called non-profit organizations are just a scam to make money off of other peoples misfortunes. They sit behind a fancy desk and deny you benefits for this or that reason so that the grant money will be used to pay their outrageous salaries. And the sad part is that they use these millitary men and women to protect their right to do so.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#23 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:22 AM EDT

        lol you couldn't be more false about nonprofits. there are no fancy desks and our budgets are very tight. and if you don't think they are actually helping people, you've clearly never worked for a nonprofit. last year, i helped a girl get a scholarship to a top university in california so she could be the first person in her family to ever go to college. do you think that is meaningless? not worth your money? not supporting charities is one thing but why are you now dismissing all nonprofits as scams too?

        • 1 vote
        #23.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:13 PM EDT
        Reply

        This sounds like the US Naval War College. The retired Navy officers hired people they know and family members. Once they are hired, they create a good old boy network and pay themselves a lot of money under the "Professor" position. They hire themselves under title 10 which gives them flexibility to get rid of people who they deem to be too honest and hardworking. Most of these so called professors do not have PhDs and are hired to teach one simple course while they take 2 to 3 weeks on conferences or seminars they teach. They only teach 3 or 4 seminars then they enjoy the rest of the time going to Monterey, California, Hawaii, and Florida. Their bonuses are huge and are kept a secret. All under taxpayer's money! If you don't belong to the retired crooked officers's club, and are just staff, you are in for a rough ride. Why? Well, they are really self absorbed, a8ssholes who think they are better than anyone! They hire their family and friends. The new College of Distance Education Director is the son of the another director who was a director more than 10 years ago. The prior director hired his son as favor for hiring him. It is really sad, these are suppose to be the best, instead they abuse the system. The whole Navy is corrupted. Admiral Wisecup who was president, knows what's going on and he turned his head away, now his the Inspector General, most likely a man who will protect his interest and the academic failures of the Naval War College

        • 5 votes
        Reply#24 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:23 AM EDT

        The complaint said that former president Roger Chapin, who during a 2008 U.S. congressional hearing about his management of the charity called himself the "the most honest person in this room," retired the following year with a nearly $2 million pension plan.

        DUH. In a room full of Congressmen, Al Capone could truthfully make that statement. Proves nothun'.

        • 9 votes
        Reply#25 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:28 AM EDT

        LOL, SSSOOOOO true.

        • 1 vote
        #25.1 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:36 AM EDT
        Ken WulfDeleted

        I know what you mean. I feel the same way about soros

        • 2 votes
        #25.3 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:58 PM EDT

        Ken Wulf, find a counselor to talk to. If you hate the V.A., go to a church, almost all ministers are certified couselors.

        • 2 votes
        #25.4 - Fri Aug 10, 2012 1:58 PM EDT
        Reply
        Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 8
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.