Jury picked for Amish beard- and hair-cutting trial

Amy Sancetta / AP file

Sam Mullet outside his home in Bergholz, Ohio, on Oct. 10, 2011.

Prosecutors will begin arguing their case Tuesday in the federal hate-crime trial of an Amish leader and 15 followers accused of forcibly cutting the beards or hair of their religious enemies last fall. 

A jury was selected on Monday for the case being heard in U.S. District Court in Cleveland, The Associated Press reported. 

Samuel J. Mullet Sr. and his co-defendants, all but one of them relatives, face charges of conspiracy, kidnapping, hate crimes and obstruction, "because of actual or perceived religion" of the victims, according to an affadavit.


Sixteen men and women are accused in three separate attacks on nine people. Mullet, 66, is accused of being the ringleader of the assaults although authorities say he was not present during any of them, according to Reuters.

Prosecutors will seek to show that Mullet had cult leader-like control over the members of the  Amish clan who allegedly engaged in the attacks. 

Some of the alleged victims are parents of some of the suspects, highlighting a bitter dispute within the Amish community, which is normally known for its pacifism.

Federal prosecutors say the attacks were revenge in a dispute between Mullet — leader  of a group of Amish in Bergholz, Ohio, that had separated from the larger Amish community 17 years ago — and other Amish bishops, according to an FBI affadavit.

Read the affidavit

A gathering of 300 mainstream Amish overturned Mullet’s decision to excommunicate eight families after they left his clan in 2005, prompting Mullet and his followers to launch the attacks, the affidavit said.

In the forcible cutting of the victims’ hair and beards with 8-inch horse mane-cutting shears, some of the victims were wounded and bloodied, the affidavit said. 

In Amish culture, men’s beard hair and women’s head hair have religious significance.

If convicted, Mullet could get life in prison, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported. 

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Follow Kari Huus on Facebook

 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3

Even the Amish are losing it now?

  • 16 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:03 PM EDT

Do they go "low ride" on their buggies and get some rims?

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:43 PM EDT

Santa Claus was excused from the jury pool.........

  • 6 votes
#1.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:58 PM EDT

Cullero, maybe!
I'm surprised they didn't flip out in jail so far! (Maybe they have!) Bad time to be part of a group that has no electricity and therefore .... no house arrest ankle bracelets.

  • 2 votes
#1.3 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:59 PM EDT

Do they have to bring the defendants to court in a horse drawing buggy?

  • 1 vote
#1.4 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:25 PM EDT

It's pretty sad I agree..

  • 1 vote
#1.5 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:34 PM EDT

Even those who claim to be so separated from society so that it does not influence they way they live are falling apart. How terrible.

  • 4 votes
#1.6 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:19 AM EDT

They'll get off on a technicality because they weren't properly Miranda-ized: "Thou hast the right to remain silent. ....."

  • 2 votes
#1.7 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:47 AM EDT

"Clop-clop-BANG-clop-clop-BANG-clop-clop-BANG!"

The sound of an Amish drive-by shooting.

  • 6 votes
#1.8 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:44 AM EDT

Not a hate crime, but a "hair crime".. Funny the guy's name is "Mullet"

  • 2 votes
#1.9 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:01 PM EDT

Actually they allowed electric to be put in their home so they could do the ankle bracelet. They can ride in a vehicle, you can take your tractor over and plow their fields and while roofing you house they will charge all their batteries for their power tools. They don't care to use it they just won't buy it.

    #1.10 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:51 PM EDT

    Why should money be spent on these people by putting them in jail? Make them do community service far from their homes and work on farms without paying them and make them sleep in the barns. Too much time and money has been spent on this nonsense.

      #1.11 - Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:20 AM EDT
      Reply
      Comment author avatarEli3kExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

      They should just do what Romney did, laugh about it and blow it off as a silly prank

      • 21 votes
      Reply#2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:05 PM EDT

      The fact that the defendant's name in yet another hate crime hair-cutting case is *Mullet* is silly enough w/o bringing Romney's *boyish hijinks* into it.

      Besides, Romney plied a pair of scissors, not Ann's dressage horse mane-cutting shears like Mullet did. Not remotely similar :P

      • 3 votes
      #2.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:08 PM EDT

      It was a crime but hardly a hate crime worthy of life in prison. What's that? Ohio has Prisons for Profit? Oh, that explains the draconian sentences and vigorous prosecutions there's a corporate profit involved....

      Carry on, there's nothing more to see here....

      [The remainder of this post has been edited by the Department of Homeland Security]

      • 8 votes
      #2.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:32 PM EDT

      This must make Romney a bit jittery, since he did the same thing to a classmate. As I learned, this type of thing, NitMitt, is assault and battery. It appears that even the ultra-religious fanatics cannot get along. What hope is there for the rest of us. God does not wave magic wands or swoop down out of the clouds to referee either.

      • 1 vote
      #2.3 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:05 AM EDT

      They would serve their time in federal prison since it a federal charge being brought against them.

      • 1 vote
      #2.4 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:53 PM EDT
      Reply

      Maybe they should also investigate the claims of rape within many Amish communities. They aren't what they appear.

      • 5 votes
      Reply#3 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:28 PM EDT

      TCHH - - maybe they should, although I'm not sure who 'they' are.
      The sad part? Even if rapes in the Amish community were proven, the sentences would be a joke compared to what these people are looking at if found guilty. The fact these are considered 'hate crimes' makes the sentencing, etc lots more serous.

        #3.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:55 PM EDT

        These people are using religion to hide behind, like fundamentalist Mormons are about arranged marriges to child brides, and abuse of women. How sad!

        • 10 votes
        #3.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:11 PM EDT
        Reply

        Is it me or does it feel the case is blowing out of proportions ? Facing "charges of conspiracy, kidnapping, hate crimes and obstruction". Next time you are off to the barber's shop, don't forget to bring witnesses with you

        • 3 votes
        Reply#4 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:52 PM EDT

        puric, This is on the news alot in here in Ohio. This guy went way out there towards a cult like group and really does not represent the Amish people. Mr Mullet and his sons broke into a mans house after a feud and cut his beard alongs with wifes hair. He is also accused of raping the wives within his clan.

        Sound familiar? Kinda like Jim Jones and the Hale Bop nut but just wearing Overalls. They expect to get a life sentance. Not a good person, I would have shot his @ss inside my house.

        • 13 votes
        #4.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:32 PM EDT

        Punic - seems that way, but who knows? I can't see how this is a hate crime & therefore rolling around in our federal courts.

          #4.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:50 PM EDT

          Judge gonna say, " Bailiff, wack them hinnies !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

          Absurd follows Absurd !!!!

            #4.3 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:14 PM EDT

            I would think that for most of us it looks like overkill but you have to remember that to the Amish, their hair and beards are sacred. On top of that, someone forcibly entered their house and held them and their children captive while they cut the hair. Most of us would kill someone for forcing their way into our houses, much less holding our children captive while they did anything. So, I think that this is a problem that would probably increase in scope if the law hadn't stepped in. Someone has to stand up to the gangs...be it a gang of Amish or not.

            • 1 vote
            #4.4 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 6:46 PM EDT
            Reply

            More confused than an Amish electrician...

            • 15 votes
            Reply#5 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:56 PM EDT

            Good thing we have hate crimes now. This guy could get life.

            Meanwhile gang members who chose to brutally assault a beat a stranger half to death on the street generally get 1 or 2 years for simple assault.

            See how backwards that is?........any libs out there seeing a problem here.

            • 11 votes
            Reply#6 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:56 PM EDT

            yup I sure do....This country if f-ed up and its not only the Teawackers but the GOP..But then I have to say its the Democrap also...People kill other people and get 20 years to life you kill someone of known value and you get death.. I guess if your Black , Hisp, or just a plain old white person you ain't worth sh*t. I just don't understand a life is a life if your a Christain or Muslim heck even a moman knows that.

            • 2 votes
            #6.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:47 PM EDT

            Your point is a good one. Why is the crime against a person in Group Whatever more serious than a person not in that group?

            That's our Congress in action, penned into law by our President.

              #6.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:48 PM EDT

              Why is the crime against a person in Group Whatever more serious than a person not in that group?

              B/c there are far more crimes committed purely b/c of who ppl in those grps are. These crimes are committed b/c the criminals decided they didn't like where you went to church, who you slept w/, what color your skin was, or in which country you were born.

              You should at least be acting like a provoking @!$%# in order for some guys to decide to kick your ass. But doing so totally unprovoked, just b/c you came from China, or were Native American, or were having sex within your own gender, or went to Mass on Sunday....nope, doesn't fly as a defense & is based upon unreasonable hatred.

              And these crimes were & still are so common, these grps merit special protection under the law for being victimized by them.

              That's our Congress in action, penned into law by our President.

              Do you even know who was the president who signed & in the Congress who passed the 1968 Civil Rights Act?

              The Civil Rights Act of 1968 enacted 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(2), which permits federal prosecution of anyone who "willingly injures, intimidates or interferes with another person, or attempts to do so, by force because of the other person's race, color, religion or national origin"

              That was the *original* law making it a crime to commit a crime against someone based on their religious beliefs....which is what Mullet did.

              The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, enacted in 28 U.S.C. § 994 note Sec. 280003, requires the United States Sentencing Commission to increase the penalties for hate crimes committed on the basis of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, or gender of any person.

              That was a different president & Congress.

              On October 28, 2009 President Obama signed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, attached to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, which expanded existing United States federal hate crime law to apply to crimes motivated by a victim's actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability

              That was the one that, for the 1st time, incl crimes against the GLBT community as hate crimes. Also a different president & Congress.

              • 2 votes
              #6.3 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:28 PM EDT

              Do YOU even know who was the President who signed the Civil Rights Act of 1875? let alone 1964?

              the civil rights act of 1968 main concern was treatment of Native Americans.

              There oughta be a law...it's never been we have too few laws....it's always been about IF and HOW the law is ENFORCED.

              This generation thinks they are better than their fore fathers, when in fact their great-great great grandparents were every bit as good if not better than them as human beings.

              • 2 votes
              #6.4 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:50 AM EDT

              Its really hard to take a comment seriously when the commenter cannot spell words like "group" "people" or "with".... No matter how much is italicized...

              • 1 vote
              #6.5 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:59 AM EDT

              Its really hard to take a comment seriously when the commenter cannot spell words like "group" "people" or "with".... No matter how much is italicized...

              O, I'm so sorry, SoFlaGirl, does the sight of my disability offend your eyes?

              Then pluck them out.

              And they say NYers are rude.

              • 2 votes
              #6.6 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:51 PM EDT

              Woooah, nelly. Calm down there, scar. No need to tell anyone to pluck their eyes out. Violence promotes violence!

              Also, I was unaware that stupidity is a disability. Thanks for the heads up!

                #6.7 - Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:32 PM EDT

                I may have missed something, but when did abbreviations become misspellings?

                  #6.8 - Sat Sep 1, 2012 2:45 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  Didn't Mitt Romney do this to someone?

                  • 13 votes
                  Reply#7 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:01 PM EDT

                  Am I the only one who finds it very funny that the man accused of cutting off hair and beards is a guy named "Mullet"?

                  • 18 votes
                  Reply#8 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:02 PM EDT

                  I was reading the comments to see if I would be the only person to mention this.

                  • 2 votes
                  #8.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:34 PM EDT

                  Yea, there's DEFINITELY some irony involved here!!!

                  • 2 votes
                  #8.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:50 PM EDT

                  Yeah I say that too.

                  • 2 votes
                  #8.3 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:55 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  Didn't Mitt Romney do this to a guy?

                  • 6 votes
                  Reply#9 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:04 PM EDT

                  Evan11113 - how many times are you going to post the same thing? Another thing lots don't know about the Amish - they are some of the worst puppy-mill offenders in the US. They consider dogs as livestock & treat them as such....killing when they can no longer bring in money by breeding. Horrible.

                  • 6 votes
                  #9.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:31 PM EDT

                  If it is true that some Amish are running puppy mills then they should be severely punished. Castration would be too good for them.

                  • 1 vote
                  #9.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:42 PM EDT

                  but they make a damn good pretzel.mmmmmmm

                  • 2 votes
                  #9.3 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:35 PM EDT

                  Yes, Evan, he did. But apparently that is ok....he called it a "childhood Prank" when he and a group of his friends ganged up on another guy they didn't like, held him down, and butchered his hair.

                  • 6 votes
                  #9.4 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:58 PM EDT

                  he called it a "childhood Prank" when he and a group of his friends ganged up on another guy they didn't like, held him down, and butchered his hair.

                  But IOKIYAR.

                  Having a rich daddy doesn't hurt, either.

                  Or having Daddy get you a real Michigan State Trooper's uniform in which you can dress up to play further *pranks*, either.

                  It's that kind of boyish hijinks that leads one to a dissipated life of hosing dog diarrhea off the windows of one's station wagon after one has scared the @!$%# out of the dog.

                  But at least he wasn't running a puppy mill. It was an adult dog.

                  And Mitt the Dog-Whisperer can commune w/ animals, b/c he claimed the dog liked being tied to the roof of the car for hrs at highway speed.

                  So sad he doesn't have that talent when it comes to not whispering to the media about state secrets whilst on foreign trips. Or insulting an entire country b/c only Mitt knows how to run an Olympics.

                  As he was multitasking by cheating on his tax returns claiming a Utah residence when he was trying to run for gov of Massachusetts.

                  I guess that state that didn't want to see his birth certificate wouldn't have him.

                  Ever notice how Romeny's just one big loop-de-loop once you get going? :-D

                  • 6 votes
                  #9.5 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:40 PM EDT

                  Why has this became a Mitt topic?

                    #9.6 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:12 PM EDT
                    Reply

                    Punishment should be a shave, haircut,bath, brush their teeth with an electric toothbrush.__Then make them watch a girliee movie. I notice he wears glasses--technology is OK for some things, but not for everything? Wonder how they sort that out.

                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#10 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:06 PM EDT

                    georgethetroll

                    I notice he wears glasses--technology is OK for some things, but not for everything? Wonder how they sort that out.

                    Eye glasses have been around since around 1300. Not exactly modern tech. Galileo used glass lens in the late 1500's and Ben Franklin was known to wear them in the late 1700's. Just don't ask them to zip it as they generally use buttons.

                    • 4 votes
                    #10.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:09 PM EDT

                    People have worn glasses before electricity so I don't think that would count. It isn't a luxury either.

                    • 2 votes
                    #10.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:09 PM EDT

                    They will use gas motors to dry corn, but not electric. They will ride in a non Amish owned car, but not own one.--list goes on

                      #10.3 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:42 AM EDT
                      Reply

                      Didn't Mitt Romeny do this to a guy?

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#11 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:08 PM EDT

                      Evan does have a point. What Romney did was exactly what these people are accused of yet he faced no charges and this guy faces life. Kidnapping and cutting the hair of a gay guy isn't a hate crime but doing that to Amish people is?

                      • 6 votes
                      #11.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:47 PM EDT

                      That's right he did pin some guy to the ground and cut his hair off didn't he. I'm not sure it was technically a hate crime though. I thought it was because he didn't like the guys hair style. Not that it makes it OK. There was some reports it was because the guy was gay although I'm sure he would never admit that.

                      • 5 votes
                      #11.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:39 PM EDT

                      Kidnapping and cutting the hair of a gay guy isn't a hate crime but doing that to Amish people is?

                      Technically when Romney did it, it wasn't yet a hate crime. Altho *gender* was added to the protected against hate crimes list in the 1990s, it was only 3 yrs ago that it was redefined to specifically mean members of the GLBT community.

                      It certainly, however, was probably battery at the least in the 1960s. But you know those prep schl kids. Dad's always got a fat wallet to make these irksome little things go away.

                      • 5 votes
                      #11.3 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:46 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      All religions who are ritualistic zealots have 0 tolerence for anyone but their own kind. The ten commandments of God have given humanity a standard of behavior not the big bang. Unfortunately people crave to exercise power over others and invent religious rituals to accomplish this. As a result we have a world history replete with violence. There is no need for organized religion. Adherence to the 10 commandments will result in a wonderful civilization that humanity would be proud of.

                      • 9 votes
                      Reply#12 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:14 PM EDT

                      Yes their religious practices are a bit out there.. Some christian and some pagan all rolled up..

                      • 2 votes
                      #12.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:25 PM EDT

                      Mikey

                      I have to agree with you. I think a persons belief does not have to be clouded by others and it should not be influenced by a church looking for donations so they can have a huge brick building with a copper roof and a gold cross!

                      • 5 votes
                      #12.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:40 PM EDT

                      Mikey; couldn't agree with you more. To quote Jessie Ventura, "organized religion is a crutch for weak-minded people who need strength in numbers."
                      All religions are cults to one degree or another. Part of the reason for this is that they attract a lot of followers who are not mentally stable to begin with.

                      • 4 votes
                      #12.3 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:49 PM EDT

                      Yeh, right. NOT. Looks like you need to just flap your gums.

                      • 1 vote
                      #12.4 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:11 PM EDT

                      All religions are cults, a cult being a group holding the same ideology... Girl Scouts, Boy Scouts could be considered a cult.

                        #12.5 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:17 PM EDT
                        Reply

                        Actually there were 15 commandments to start with, but Mel Brooks dropped and broke one of the stone tablets leaving only 10.

                        • 11 votes
                        Reply#13 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:18 PM EDT

                        That is funny George but the movie was funnier

                        • 5 votes
                        #13.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:23 PM EDT

                        Oy...

                        • 1 vote
                        #13.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:30 PM EDT
                        Reply

                        I guess I will bite!

                        Evan you are a worthless troll. You have the intellect of a 6 year old!

                        • 3 votes
                        Reply#14 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:20 PM EDT

                        What a terrible thing to say about 6 year olds.

                        • 5 votes
                        #14.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:41 PM EDT

                        You're right William!

                        I apologise to all the six year olds except for evan!

                        • 7 votes
                        #14.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:46 PM EDT

                        Why is he a troll? Because he questions why the guy running for president gets to walk scott free for something someone else is facing "charges of conspiracy, kidnapping, hate crimes and obstruction, "? Sounds like an intelligent position to me. The six year olds seem to be you two.

                        • 2 votes
                        #14.3 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:03 PM EDT

                        Sounds like high school.

                          #14.4 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:13 PM EDT

                          Why is he a troll? Because he questions why the guy running for president gets to walk scott free for something someone else is facing "charges of conspiracy, kidnapping, hate crimes and obstruction, "?

                          No, because he keeps asking the same question like little kids do. "Are we there yet?"... "Are we there yet?"... "Are we there yet?"...

                          • 3 votes
                          #14.5 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:38 PM EDT

                          No, because he keeps asking the same question like little kids do. "Are we there yet?"... "Are we there yet?"... "Are we there yet?"...

                          Evan probably just got the notorious *bubblegum* glitch & doesn't realize you need to refresh the pg to see if it actually did go thru b4 trying to re-post. It only appears as tho he's asking it a million times b/c his posts are no longer together b/c ppl replied in-btwn them.

                          Evan you are a worthless troll. You have the intellect of a 6 year old!

                          Inflammatory. Not allowed under CoH. That's called a personal attack. Don't. Click the ! icon & report inflammatory posts. If enough ppl do it, the offender gets a nice suspension :-D

                          • 2 votes
                          #14.6 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:51 PM EDT

                          @ Scar - I would accept that if he had just posted a "Whoops" reply to his other two posts. It seems a little strange to post that question more than once and make no other reply at all. I'm not saying it couldn't happen but it seems strange.

                          • 1 vote
                          #14.7 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:05 AM EDT
                          Reply

                          Religion is source of hate. My imaginary being is better than yours. You don't pray to my imaginary being correctly. I guess "shunning" or not speaking to each other was not severe enough.

                          • 5 votes
                          Reply#15 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:24 PM EDT

                          Once again, zealots using violence as a means to their ends. But hey, how is this any different from the nut jobs in Afghanistan, Iran or other parts of the world where religion preempts a civil society. Just another example of “Christians” not being very Christ like. So typical.

                          • 4 votes
                          Reply#16 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:35 PM EDT

                          How is it different?? Well they are not blowing people up. C'mon guy that's a pretty lame comparison.

                          • 1 vote
                          #16.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:57 PM EDT

                          Batini

                          I would agree with you. If, there were not so many threats on here. About civil war. If the Christians, don't get their way, in November.

                          I have read more than, just a few threats of that. If Obama, is re-elected, Plus an official, claiming, the same thing.

                          Makes me think of them. As something different. Than what they profess to be.

                            #16.2 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:27 AM EDT

                            The next time a muslim blows up 50 people or stones a woman to death for not wearing a veil the defenders of Islam can now point to the Amish as well as Christians that are also clearly evil. They'll go back hundreds of years to find Christian atrocities and I'm sure this will now be brought up as well.

                            Oops, didn't see Toms post. They're already at it. I can't even imagine how these peoples minds work.

                              #16.3 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:36 AM EDT
                              Reply

                              Tnis is just a perfect example of why I don't buy into any oranized religion...Momma Rose hit it right.....jail that dude and call it a day

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#17 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:45 PM EDT

                              the guys name would have to be mullet haha, and as far as romney anything is better than what we have now!

                              • 2 votes
                              Reply#18 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:48 PM EDT

                              john h: That what I was thinking about the name. Made me LOL.

                                #18.1 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:39 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                So why are we using tax dollars to take to court those who don't pay taxes?

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#19 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:56 PM EDT

                                yup, sounds about right

                                hair cut - life

                                rape , murder - 5 to 10

                                • 2 votes
                                Reply#20 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:07 PM EDT

                                Good points! Talk about absurd!
                                The whole Hate Crime law & the thinking (?) behind it are a waste!

                                • 1 vote
                                #20.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:43 PM EDT

                                Good points! Talk about absurd!
                                The whole Hate Crime law & the thinking (?) behind it are a waste!

                                You wouldn't think so if you were a member of Matthew Shepard's family.

                                Fred Phelps, leader of the Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas, took his church's "God Hates Fags" message to the funeral of Matthew Shepard, held in Casper, Wyoming, on Saturday, October 17, 1998. Two of his picket signs read: "No Tears for Queers" and "Fag Matt in Hell."

                                These @!$%#s ought to be chaged w/ hate crimes, too.

                                • 3 votes
                                #20.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:54 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                Has the hate crime thing been around for a long time or is it more recent?. What happened to the ole crime is a crime?. If a man kills his wife because he now hates her, is that classified as a hate crime?. The hate crime thing seems weird.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#21 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:10 PM EDT

                                I agree. If you hurt / kill me, is it that big of a leap to think you might also have hated me??
                                A "hate crime" makes any crime against someone in a specific group more horrible than if you're only in the group called "humans."
                                Tip your hat to our Pres for signing this BS into law!

                                • 2 votes
                                #21.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:23 PM EDT

                                hate implies anger.what if people do it for the fun of it?

                                  #21.2 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 10:40 PM EDT

                                  Has the hate crime thing been around for a long time or is it more recent?.

                                  1968.

                                  If you hurt / kill me, is it that big of a leap to think you might also have hated me??

                                  It is if the sole motivation is your race, religion, country of origin, or sexual orientation.

                                  Tip your hat to our Pres for signing this BS into law!

                                  Which president are you tipping your hat to, exactly?

                                  There have been 3 versions, ea redefining its predecessors, in the last 46 yrs.

                                  If you're tipping it to Obama, his sign-off didn't add in the religion bit, which is what this particular case is using. You should be tipping it to LBJ for the original version.

                                  hate implies anger.what if people do it for the fun of it?

                                  Even more reason to put them away for life, b/c they've shown they're very sick mother@!$%#ers.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  #21.3 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:05 AM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  It's about time we stopped idealizing the "peaceful" Amish. They may refuse to fight in wars, but they're regular human beings, not that different from the rest of us crass, ordinary folk.

                                  • 1 vote
                                  Reply#22 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:29 PM EDT

                                  Amish on Amish crime.....such a national tragedy.

                                  • 3 votes
                                  Reply#23 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:35 PM EDT

                                  Lol!

                                    #23.1 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:40 PM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    Sam Mullet sounds like he is the Amish version of Charles Manson!

                                    • 3 votes
                                    Reply#24 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:38 PM EDT

                                    Old Sam Mullett took the scissors

                                    And told the neighbor, "Now you'll get yers"

                                    When the missus said, "Get out, you knaves!"

                                    He turned around and cut her waves.

                                      #24.1 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:32 AM EDT
                                      Reply

                                      A HATE CRIME?!?! Are they kidding?

                                      Gee. How many people were robbed, beaten & murdered in the greater Cleveland area alone in the last month or so? Guess those crimes fall under the new "non-hate law" law.

                                      If you've never heard of the "non-hate law" law - it's hot off the Congressional press & lawyers are foaming at the mouth! The new law really helps people that commit crimes against people they feel "non-hate" toward get what they deserve!!! (Twice the jail time & 10x the expense to each citizen.) Marvelous!

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#25 - Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:40 PM EDT

                                      If I was on the jury I probably wouldn't go much beyond assault. Six months sounds appropriate.

                                        #25.1 - Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:41 AM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.