Government chopper used for son's dance invitation

FBI are investigating a hoax call involving two flights landing at New York’s John F. Kennedy Airport. The caller claimed there were hijackers hiding in the wheel wells of both planes. WNBC’s Pei-Sze Cheng reports.

U.S. Customs and Border Patrol officials are investigating claims that one of its helicopters was used to help a teenager invite a girl to homecoming.

While on a routine mission over northern Virginia last Wednesday, a CBP helicopter was allegedly used by a Department of Homeland Security employee to fly over his son’s high school and drop a stuffed animal with the invitation, NBCWashington.com reported.

Students, who were just being released from classes for the day, watched excitedly as the helicopter hovered close to the football field and dropped a stuffed bulldog with a red bandanna parachute to the ground. Then students said they saw the junior boy, carrying pink roses, walking toward the senior girl and leading her to the football field to collect the stuffed animal, which delivered the message, “Fall Fest?,” The Washington Post reported.


Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

Irene Cromer, a Prince William County Public Schools spokesperson, told The Washington Post that the boy’s father asked the principal for permission to have a helicopter fly in and drop the stuffed animal.

A US Customs and Border Patrol pilot is under investigation after using a helicopter to help his son invite a girl to a high school homecoming dance. WRC's Derrick Ward reports.

“It was completely authorized,” Cromer said. “They did ask for permission. They were granted permission.”

It’s unclear how the incident was planned and who was flying the helicopter, but the boy’s father is a senior official in air operations at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Watch the most-viewed videos on NBCNews.com

In a statement, Michael Friel of U.S. Customs and Border Protection said, “CBP management is looking into the matter and the pilot in command of the aircraft has been relieved and reassigned to administrative duties pending completion of the review of the incident.”

Patriot High School’s Fall Festival is Saturday, September 29. 

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 5

Once again the taxpayer foots the bill for some moron that thinks taxpayer property should be used as his own personal playtoys. This guy needs to billed billed for the flight pay of the crew and the cost of the fuel it took to pull this stunt.

  • 76 votes
#1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:43 PM EDT
Comment author avatarDevils sonExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

I worked for a major medical center/university in Chicago. The Med Center had a air rescue helicopter. It had to make runs to refuel to Midway airport. They would give employees rides there and back basically for fun. Until it was stopped due to liability issues. This was probably similar so I doubt if any "taxpayer funds" or at least very little were involved. He had the schools permission. If he had is boss's permission, big deal. I bet Romney and Trump uses their aircraft for personal reasons and deducts the fuel as a business expense.

  • 11 votes
#1.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:46 PM EDT

So they "relieved the pilot" of his duties, they know who "requested" the fly over AND THEY HAVE TO INVESTIGATE!!! INVESTIGATE WHAT? We know who the kid is, we ALSO KNOW WHO THE PERSON WORKING FOR HOMELAND SECURITY IS AND THE RELATIONSHIP, WHAT DO WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE? I know what should be done, the person responsible for ORDERING THE PILOT to perform this act SHOULD BE FIRED, the person ORDERING the flight plan, SHOULD BE FIRED, the person allowing the school drop SHOULD BE FIRED, the pilot should get a raise for doing what he was told, and then that money should be taken away BECAUSE HE DID NOT TURN THE ASS*OLE IN FOR WASTING GOVERNMENT MONEY. No "investigation" is needed, any 3rd grader could handle this job.

  • 26 votes
#1.2 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:51 PM EDT

Devils son -- are you serious??? He got the schools permission to hover the helicopter and that makes it ok. Little or no taxpayer $$$???? You're either out of touch or you're part of the 49% that don't pay taxes therefore you are clueless about where us WORKING TAXPAYER's $$$ goes. That is government (read TAXPAYER) property and it doesn't run on air. So who paid for the fuel and their paychecks? Please don't comment when you REALLY don't know what you're talking about.

  • 23 votes
#1.3 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:05 PM EDT

I am retired Navy aircrew myself. I know that flight crews are scheduled for certain amount of flight time for training. If you take off at home base at 10 AM and have to fly navigation trainers for two hours and land back at home plate at noon, does it really hurt anything if the rout for the training flight goes over your families house and you tell you wife to take the kids outside at 11 to wave to Daddy? You can fly for two hours someplace else, or you can fly over a preferred route and do some good for morale.

And the tax payer is not out any more money if a flight crew gets to let his kids see "daddy's airplane". For the extra time the pilot of this helo hovered, well, hovering is part of the flight proficiency training. Doing 20 minutes of hover to drop the bear, or hover over the practice field is still 20 minutes of hover practice.

If people understand that these little side trips or "Fam Flights" are already covered under the exisiting training budgets, all it is doing is boostign morale a bit. If that bothers you that somebody could actually do their jobs AND smile a bit, then you are a bloody-minded ass.

I have over 3,600 flight hours in EC-130s and spent 21 years in naval aviation. Such flights are a small pittance in compensation for those 2 AM preflights and missing your kids dance recital. So, Ray4ausa, I just showed you how this could occur and NOT COST THE TAXPAYER a penny more than was already scheduled for the day's pilot proficiency training. You are right - NO investigation is needed.

  • 50 votes
#1.4 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:07 PM EDT

The pilot and anyone else involved in this incident should be fired. The unauthorized use of government equipment is not a minor matter, particularly when you are talking about something like a helicopter. They should also be forced to reimbursed the government for the costs fuel and use of the aircraft. Government employees need to be put on notice that government vehicles and aircraft are not their personal toys. In the DC area, the use of government vehicles for personal use is rampant, with the taxpayer footing the bill for the gas and additional maintenance on the vehicle. There should also be an FAA investigation to see if the pilot violated and flight rules to determine if his license should be revoked. Normally, flying below 500 feet over a residential area is illegal unless it is part of official business. It sounds like this pilot may have violated this rule, whether he had permission from the high school principal or not does not matter, the principal has no authority to waive flight rules. There really does not need to be any investigation on the CBP side, they know full well who was flying the helicopter and they know who the senior official was who was involved in setting this up. There is no need to continue to pay these people while they spend six months to a year investigating, they should just fire the pilot and the boys father. The reason for the "investigation" is so they can wait for the furor to die down and then just sweep it under the rug. These people need to be fired immediately the same way they would be in private industry for such blatant misuse of property.

  • 7 votes
#1.5 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:11 PM EDT

...the boy’s father is a senior official in air operations at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

In a statement, Michael Friel of U.S. Customs and Border Protection said, “CBP management is looking into the matter and the pilot in command of the aircraft has been relieved and reassigned to administrative duties pending completion of the review of the incident.”

Is the pilot and senior official one and the same? From the way it's written I'm assuming not. So I'm totally with you Ray4ausa. The pilot was probably ordered (even doing it as a for you boss/supervisor) to do it. Blame the jerk that ordered the pilot to misappropriate government funds. Fire him AFTER deducting the cost of the flight from his final paycheck.

  • 8 votes
#1.6 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:20 PM EDT

Shouldn't DHS be busy figuring out new ways to invade Americans' privacy and liberty?

  • 3 votes
#1.7 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:23 PM EDT

Jim Burrill -

Thank you for your post - and your service!!!

  • 9 votes
#1.8 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:33 PM EDT

So what! If any one of us had the ability to make their child feel like a VIP I know that I would have done exactly the same thing. With ALL the money the government wastes on silly things like the thousands of dollars on toilet seats etc. As long as no one was hurt BIG DEAL!

  • 6 votes
#1.9 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:36 PM EDT

If what Jim Burrill is saying is true, then why can't the officials be quoted in this article at least throw that little scenario that Jim is touting out there so that the rest of us have some sort of clue as to what goes on in our own damn country?! I would have no problem with it if it were part of the route during training or whatever. This at first look, does not appear to be the case. Will we ever know? If it turns out that Daddy just wanted to make sure that his boy looked macho in front of a girl and the rest of the school, then Daddy should be fired and all costs for this little adventure taken out of his final pay.

  • 8 votes
#1.10 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 PM EDT

JMS, Why don't you contact the U.S. Customs and Border Patrol and tell them you'll pay the bill for this no "BIG DEAL" "wastes on silly things?"

I'm sure they would accept the money. :-)

  • 4 votes
#1.11 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:55 PM EDT

Another one voting with Jim B. Those of you condemning the act should chill.

If the helo took off just for operation "bear drop", then maybe a violation.

If the pilot was flying nearby anyway, then I say go ahead make the kids day. Maybe one of them decides to become a pilot one day.

Thank you for your service, Jim.

  • 6 votes
#1.12 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:06 PM EDT

The primary reason this is not stated publicly AlaskaGirl is that if something were to go wrong (pilot or mechanical failure and god forbid someone were to be seriously injured) there wouldn't be anyone to blame. Bottom line is this; the Pilot has the final decision to make in this scenario, delivery of a stuffed animal over the safety of the students on the ground !!!! Let's see, I go with safety of the students on the ground. I suppose it would have been too much to ask the Post Office or FedEx to hand deliver the stuffed animal, huh. This is not really about taxpayer's money or taxpayer/government property....it's about using common sense. A serious lack of it occurred today

  • 3 votes
#1.13 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:11 PM EDT

Don't worry - it's an isolated incident, and they're taking it seriously, so you can all go back to sleep.

  • 1 vote
#1.14 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:11 PM EDT

I thought the Secret Service was in charge of procuring nocturnal company? Boy it's tough keeping up with government agency progress and responsibilities.

  • 2 votes
#1.15 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:08 PM EDT

I think that all kids should have the same opportunity! So, even if it really doesn't cost anything for this "hovering", let's do it for all the kids!

/sarcasm

  • 6 votes
#1.16 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:11 PM EDT

How is this different from all the shenanigans John McCain pulled with taxpayer-owned planes? That would include the one he crashed and then lied about and taking out power lines in Spain playing the 'daredevil' ~ his own term.

  • 1 vote
#1.17 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:47 PM EDT

rogerstv,

The article stated that this was a previously scheduled transport flight carrying the crew and a highly-placed official of the CBP air operations, in other words the crew's boss. The school was along the flightpath. The only diversion actually taken was the hover over the practice field, which had been cleared by school administration.

I agree that this is trying to make a mountain out of an anthill (does quite rise to the level of a molehill). Remember when Prince Harry actually landed his helicopter, in mid-exercise, to have a spot of tea at a local pub? If anyone deserves "punishment" for this, it would be the truly responsible party, the dad (highly-placed official in the CBP air operations) who should have thought more. Regardless of how innocent, the haters and gripers are out in force during this election season.

  • 2 votes
#1.18 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:01 PM EDT

Jim B. ~ thank you. Folks that have never been involved don't have a clue and unfortunately the news never posts full details on any of these stories. No harm was done.

    #1.19 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:19 PM EDT

    You people are missing the point. This boy goes through all this trouble, probably gonna get his parent fired and all he puts in the note is Fall Fest?

    Are you kidding me? Creativity fell short here.

    • 1 vote
    #1.20 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:42 PM EDT
    Reply

    It’s unclear how the incident was planned and who was flying the helicopter, but the boy’s father is a senior official in air operations at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

    a senior official with the boarder patrol has time for this but not the no papers / no fear bus? WTF is wrong with this picture?

    • 17 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:03 PM EDT

    At a time when our government places cuts on welfare, health care, fuel assistance. Add to that the price of fuel for your car the rent or mortgage and the little things like food ( because maybe you want to eat at least once a week ) And add the fact that the price of all these things go up almost every day ( or so it seems ) When clowns like this guy uses our tax money for things like this Maybe it's time to pass laws that would punish them harshly. Maybe all politicians should work for the same pay as most of us have to do. Or even better Have a list of names for every one in the U.S. of voting age and a blind man throw a dart. Then the guy or girl whose name gits hit Becomes the next prez. congressmen ect. I mean really ffs how could they do a worse job then the numb @ss's we have on the job now ?? How far will the push us before something breaks ? any way thanks for letting me rant and good luck to all in the future ( we ALL are going to need it )

    • 14 votes
    Reply#3 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:06 PM EDT

    What cuts? More Americans than ever are collecting some form of entitlements. In fact, we should be kicking all the lazy moorchers who were collecting long before the recession off in order to clear up funds for honest Americans who are currently down on their luck.

    • 3 votes
    #3.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:29 PM EDT

    The only cuts I have yet to see is the pay the corrupt or incompetent politicians get plus their perks kickbacks graphs and lobbyist . And lets be honest Most of America is down on its luck. And yet we send billions to foreign governments while our powers that be scream about how broke we are. Understand I'm not looking to change your opinion. I was just exspressing mine as I for one and right fed up with Washington

    • 6 votes
    #3.2 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:12 PM EDT

    BigBadBampa,

    Well, except for some farm programs, the rest of business benefits seem to be living on as well. In addition to the $billions that many received through the stimulus efforts. And yet today, we read of the huge cash coffers being kept by Exxon-Mobil, health-insurers, pharmaceuticals, and technology (10 companies, who in total hold over $317billion). And yet, they still receive special depreciation allowances, research grants and allowances, and H1b employee visas for foreign workers on-demand.

    • 1 vote
    #3.3 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:09 PM EDT
    Reply

    In a statement, Michael Friel of U.S. Customs and Border Protection said, “CBP management is looking into the matter and the pilot in command of the aircraft has been relieved and reassigned to administrative duties pending completion of the review of the incident.”

    translation;

    we are working hard to bury this as fast as we can.

    • 24 votes
    Reply#4 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:07 PM EDT

    Yeah, Scooter, go figure that I am sure Czar Napolitano got to approve it because that's what she would do! - bury it and she probably told Friel that's how you cover this up.

    • 7 votes
    #4.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:11 PM EDT

    Should have been prefaced by

    WARNING: RIGHT WING STUPIDITY!

    Yeah, Scooter, go figure that I am sure Czar Napolitano got to approve it because that's what she would do! - bury it and she probably told Friel that's how you cover this up.

      #4.2 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:58 PM EDT

      another comment from the 49% -- afraid all those freebies are coming to an end and you're going to have to EARN your way and pay TAXES?

      • 4 votes
      #4.3 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:06 PM EDT

      Why are you such a mean and vile sounding person?

      • 2 votes
      #4.4 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:35 PM EDT

      Eh - Dottie - get your figures straight 47%. Jeez - you can't even troll correctly

      • 2 votes
      #4.5 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:31 PM EDT
      Reply

      Fire the senior official. Fire the pilot. And then let's all root for the OTHER team on Homecoming night! :-)

      • 8 votes
      Reply#5 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:10 PM EDT

      The pilot may have been doing as ordered.

      • 6 votes
      #5.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:49 PM EDT

      I agree with your, Dr. Knowalittle. While the pilot should be disciplined for obvious lack of common sense, I do believe that he was acting under orders from the Senior Official. It's the S.O. who should be fired, required to reimburse the cost of fuel and other costs plus 50% (just so he understands his stupidity), lose all pension and other benefits, AND do 250 hours of community service for his poor judgement. It's not worth sending him to jail as that would be a true waste of taxpayer money.

      • 10 votes
      #5.2 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:24 PM EDT

      "I was just following orders" - where have we heard that before?

      • 1 vote
      #5.3 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:13 PM EDT

      The Angry Guy,

      So "follow (special, but otherwise legal) orders" or " "pack your bags for your new assignment in Alaska" means nothing. Not every post demands a blatant to Nazism. You're not angry, you are bitter.

        #5.4 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:14 PM EDT

        'The Stuffed Bulldog Made Me Do It!' Wise near a school with kids coming out, no. If it was during an officially sancitioned flight ... yeah I still see problems with it ... but ... few.

          #5.5 - Thu Sep 20, 2012 7:24 AM EDT
          Reply

          Problem;

          Boarder patrol not doing their job people are taking note and upset.

          Solution;

          stay in the spotlight doing stupid stuff and throw it in their face.

          Source;

          lib logic 101 handbook

          • 4 votes
          Reply#6 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:11 PM EDT

          Lib?

          I'm sure you mean democrat, since that is the corporate face of a liberal. Saying "lib logic" is like saying "all republicans support pork" just because some do. Liberals could be you, they could be me. In fact, I bet if you ever have a gay kid, you'll end up a little liberal yourself.

          You use the word "Logic," but I do not think it means what you think it means.

          • 5 votes
          #6.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:36 PM EDT
          Reply
          Comment author avatarCan You Spell Socialism?Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

          Nothing new - Just more waste, fraud and abuse under Obama.

          • 11 votes
          Reply#7 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:19 PM EDT

          Bush created TSA, and also expanded "socialism" more than any President since FDR by putting the prescription drug plan in place UNFUNDED, expanding medicare singlehandedly (oops, actually not singlehandedly since the GOP congress had to pass it. Should we talk about the socialist bank bail out and TARP, started by Bush? Hmmmm? Can you spell socialism?

          • 13 votes
          #7.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:30 PM EDT

          smoot

          blame bush ?? REALLY? are you @!$%#tin me?

          1. this has nothing to do with the TSA

          2. it was a dem congress under bush

          3. clinton/frank/dodd own the bank mess

          4.spell socialism?? sure....O-B-A-M-A

          5. bush is no longer in charge of these clowns

          • 12 votes
          #7.2 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:43 PM EDT

          Can You Spell Socialism?

          My first thought was that... Christie the Hut was flying in from N.J. doing a favor for his son.

          • 2 votes
          #7.3 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:56 PM EDT
          Comment author avatarCroc15Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

          I knew one of these Obammy boy supporters would TRY to blame President Bush! You people need to get over it,you can't blame every single mess that your Obammy boy creates on President Bush!

          • 6 votes
          #7.4 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:13 PM EDT

          Can You Spell Socialism?

          Nothing new - Just more waste, fraud and abuse under Obama.

          Yes I can...Here it is...Socialism for wealthy - aka Mitt Romney


          • 6 votes
          #7.5 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:22 PM EDT

          The guy at the Pizza Hut delivered my pizza 30 minutes late and cold.. do I blame Obama or Bush? It happened while Obama was President, but he was hired while Bush was President.. and it looks like his car was manufactured under President Carter.

          If we're going to start blaming the sitting President for every stupid thing a government employee does we're going to wear ourselves out pretty quick regardless of who is in office.

          • 5 votes
          #7.6 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:48 PM EDT

          Croc15

          I knew one of these Obammy boy supporters would TRY to blame President Bush! You people need to get over it,you can't blame every single mess that your Obammy boy creates on President Bush!

          Why not??? You boys still blame Clinton.

          • 2 votes
          #7.7 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:53 PM EDT

          IA.ScooterTramp

          blame bush ?? REALLY? are you @!$%#tin me?

          As I stated above...why not you clowns still blame Clinton.

          1. this has nothing to do with the TSA

          This is Homeland Security which was created by Bush and the TSA is a part of it.

          2. it was a dem congress under bush

          How soon we forget that Bush had a Republican house under Bush that controlled the budget.

          3. clinton/frank/dodd own the bank mess

          Ah...the blame Clinton thing again. It was the GrammLeachBliley Act that gutted the bank regulations that caused this mess and it was a veto proof bil. Then Phill Gramm slipped in more deregulations in another bill as a rider that finished the job.

          http://losangeles.legalexaminer.com/miscellaneous/the-subprime-mess-and-phil-gramm-an-experiment-in-deregulation.aspx

          4.spell socialism?? sure....O-B-A-M-A

          How about R-E-P-U-B-L-I-C-A-N as in farm and oil company subsidies along with the tax cuts for the wealthy.

          5. bush is no longer in charge of these clowns

          We are still paying the price of the Bush administration blunders and will for many years to come.

          • 2 votes
          #7.8 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:16 PM EDT

          ScooterTramp- Bush had full controll of our government for his first 6 years in office. The Republicans held a large majority of the Senate and House and even had a majority in the Judiciary.

          The financial collapse was caused primarily by the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which had protected the country since the Great Depression. That repeal was due to a veto proof bill by Phil Gramm (R) in 1999. Barney Frank had nothing to do with the collapse. He had no power until 2007-2008. You cannot name one bill sponsored by Frank which could have contributed to the problem.

          Repeal of Glass-Steagall allowed the banks to perform credit default swaps.

            #7.9 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:03 PM EDT

            Pointing fingers at parties does no good, almost (if not all) politicians are to blame, regardless of what political affiliation they support.

            Anybody but the lousy choices we have now/2012

            • 1 vote
            #7.10 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:51 PM EDT
            Reply

            It’s unclear how the incident was planned and who was flying the helicopter, but the boy’s father is a senior official in air operations at the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

            yet another large and in charge genius and,

            “CBP management is looking into the matter and the pilot in command of the aircraft has been relieved and reassigned

            so the PILOT is being blamed, and being reviewed by the very same "senior official"who allowed it in the first place?

            But they are not totally to blame. after all what else do they have to do? obama wont allow them to do their jobs.

            • 5 votes
            Reply#8 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:21 PM EDT

            opps my bad i didn't catch

            While on a routine mission over northern Virginia last Wednesday, a CBP helicopter was allegedly used by a Department of Homeland Security employee to fly over his son’s high school and drop a stuffed animal with the invitation, NBCWashington.com reported.

            But tell me what Routine operation was this? .....protecting the boarder of North Virgina?.....from what?

            • 11 votes
            #8.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:27 PM EDT

            They are protecting us by dropping attack stuffed animals on schools to protect the children.

            • 4 votes
            #8.2 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:52 PM EDT

            Scooter,

            with the type of response of CBP flying over Northern VA, ya never know where those crafty illegals will head. The farther north of the border, the safer they feel. However, the stuffed toy was only a diversionary tactic - yeah, yeah that their story and they are sticking to it!

            • 2 votes
            #8.3 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:15 PM EDT

            Scooter ... are you aware that there are places where items shipped from overseas are received in NOVA and MD? You know... SHIPYARDS? The full name is CUSTOMS and Border Patrol. There are also THREE International airports in the DC metro area ... Ronald Reagan Airport, Dulles and Baltimore-Washington. But I guess the CUSTOMS aspects must have slipped everybody's minds.

            • 2 votes
            #8.4 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:16 PM EDT

            1. It was a routine training flight.

            2. the boy was the son of the pilot.

            • 2 votes
            #8.5 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:38 PM EDT

            Give them a break. This was all part of their NEW undercover operation. Remember Operation Fast and Furious where they were going to put chips in all those automatic weapons and sell them to mexican gangs? Well, this was a training flight for Fast and FURRIEST where they put tracking chips into stuffed animals. It all makes sense when you think about it like a bureaucrat.

            • 1 vote
            #8.6 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:52 PM EDT

            IA.ScooterTramp,

            Please pay a little more attention to the agency's name "Customs and Border Patrol". This agency not only polices entry of people into the United States, but also the entry of animals, plant products (including food) and material goods; assessing tariffs where appropriate. If you have traveled outside the US; you know that on your return, you first deal with the agents controlling border (Border Patrol or Customs depending on venue) and then with the Customs Agents controlling entry of materials (Customs can search you, your luggage, your vehicles used in crossing the border). Movement of personnel and material, including collected evidence is probably pretty routine and probably more practical with helicopters than fixed wing aircraft or automobiles.

            • 1 vote
            #8.7 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:30 PM EDT
            Reply

            You do have to admitit is pretty cool though!

            • 1 vote
            Reply#9 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:24 PM EDT

            That boy is definitely going to get some action that night.....gitty

              #9.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:22 PM EDT
              Reply

              They are not allowed to protect our borders or enforce the laws so why not.

              Too bad MSNBC wasn't this excited when a the Air Force had to dispatch a Gulfliner to ferry the obama dog to Hyannis Port. Guess Bo couldn't tag along on Air Force one.

              BYW.. When I say the "obama dog" I meant the dog Ted Kennedy gave Barry... not the other one.

              • 7 votes
              Reply#10 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:27 PM EDT

              If you are a proud American (notice the capital "A") veteran, why don't you do the honorable thing and tell the truth instead of spreading lies, schmucko? THe airport could not accomodate Airforce 1 so they had to fly to gulf streams to haul aids, staff and the O'bama family.

              I would question whether you were really in the military.

              • 8 votes
              #10.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:36 PM EDT

              Since you have neither the courage or foresight to question anything about the obama propaganda machine I doubt you lack the courage for anything.

              I would question if you are even capable of independent thought.

              However, Maybe you can enlighten us about the Air Force jet that was provided to fly the first daughter and friends to Mexico for Spring Break?

              Lets not forget the Nancy Pelosi Fiesta either.

              • 5 votes
              #10.2 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:55 PM EDT

              Can't defend your position so you change the subject huh? Sissy.

              • 8 votes
              #10.3 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:59 PM EDT

              WOW! You can tell smoot is an Obammy boy supporter,his mommy must have told him who to "support"!

              • 3 votes
              #10.4 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:17 PM EDT

              The thing about arguing with Libs is ... you can't The only right way of thinking is there way.They have a magical ability to make logic disappear. If you do manage to make a point they tend to attack and say such things as "Can't defend your position so you change the subject huh? Sissy." and avoid the question. Notice that smoot mahooty did not answer your question ? The true mark of the truly blind. And if you are reading this Smoot You need to think a bit before you respond. as you are the one that changed the subject when proudAmerican ( notice the cap ? ) replied "

              Since you have neither the courage or foresight to question anything about the obama propaganda machine I doubt you lack the courage for anything.

              I would question if you are even capable of independent thought.

              However, Maybe you can enlighten us about the Air Force jet that was provided to fly the first daughter and friends to Mexico for Spring Break? "

              Lets not forget the Nancy Pelosi Fiesta either.

              • 4 votes
              #10.5 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:31 PM EDT

              Jim Burrell, great to have a post from someone who knows what he's talking about from experience and who makes sense. Since the aircraft was flying a routine mission over Northern Virginia and the school also is in Northern Virginia the detour likely was minor. If the aircraft flew extra miles, charge for the extra fuel unless it was just flying around to satisfy flight time requirements. Those who want blood, get it somewhere else.

                #10.6 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:15 PM EDT

                proud,

                I notice that Mr. Boehner kept the Speaker's jet, even after complaining about it. Just like Texas took all the federal aid, after complaining about it. Some of us really do pay attention.

                And since no member of the First Family can travel by public transport due to Secret Service issues, are you suggesting that a President's spouse and children be immediately confined to the White House as a posh prison?

                By the way, I also spell the name of our company with a capital "A", America.

                  #10.7 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:37 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  Last time I saw the regs, dropping objects from aircraft is "frowned on" by the FAA. Of course, that's probably all the CBP pilot will get is a good "frowning."

                  • 5 votes
                  Reply#11 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:27 PM EDT

                  fire all involved today. This is such poor judgement how can you not dismiss them immediately.

                  • 4 votes
                  Reply#12 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:28 PM EDT

                  Dad should have just bought him a nice hooker with big floppy knockers to "escort" him to the dance. Would have been far cheaper, he would have retained his job and sonny boy would have been guaranteed to get laid.

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#13 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:32 PM EDT

                  It was completely authorized,” Cromer said. “They did ask for permission. They were granted permission.”

                  I bet you it wasn't authorized by Homeland security lady.

                  • 5 votes
                  Reply#14 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:40 PM EDT

                  maybe he was checking for "terrorist"on the ball field...our tax dollars at work...but i do feel safer now...

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#15 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:43 PM EDT

                  $500-1000 invite, better get him places..

                    Reply#16 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 1:57 PM EDT

                    Wait a minute, so the chopper was on a routine mission in the area and took 5 minutes to drop the bear? What's the big deal?

                    • 4 votes
                    Reply#17 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:04 PM EDT

                    I agree. Seriously, what the hell is the 'big deal' here? So the Father did something irresponsible with Federal equipment. At LEAST the son involved has a Father who is involved with his life, and wanted to do something 'out of the norm' for his Son's dance.

                    Bill the Father and Son for the cost of fuel, dock the Father an hour of two of pay, and be done with it.

                    These people crying about their tax money be spent on a stupid stunt, are now so eager to have even MORE of their money spent on ridiculous Federal investigations over a Father taking some 'taxpayers time' for doing something special for his Son.

                    • 1 vote
                    #17.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:30 PM EDT

                    Tony Titan

                    I understand parenting and doing great things for the children, however,

                    Look up the word rationalization please. Once you see the meaning, then read your post again.

                    These people crying about their tax money be spent on a stupid stunt, are now so eager to have even MORE of their money spent on

                    I know - the amount of money spent here, there and a trillion here and a trillion there. You don't think that adds up when we are in a deficit and it keeps going higher.

                    • 2 votes
                    #17.2 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:12 PM EDT

                    Chuck 25 and Tony. look up rationalization then refer to my comments in #17.2

                      #17.3 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:19 PM EDT

                      I am being 'rational'....Charge the Dad and his Son for the fuel, dock Dad an hour or two of pay, and be done with the whole thing. It's NOT that big of a deal.

                      Spending any extra money while in a deficit, for an investigation that concludes that Dad simply did something irresponsible....THAT is being irrational & irresponsible.(for wanting to spend money we don't have)

                        #17.4 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:39 PM EDT

                        How do you know the chopper was on a routine mission? It is a big deal.

                        • 2 votes
                        #17.5 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:53 PM EDT

                        Tony, I am sorry you do not understand what rationalization means - basically, it means its Okay because "no harm, no foul" and "everybody does it so why can't I" - it is used in the context of defense mechanism in psychology - like if you got caught with your hands in the cookie jar and you told your mom, "I was really hungry and it is at least another hour until supper". I hope this helps you with the understanding rationalization, not the word rational.

                          #17.6 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:05 PM EDT

                          Tony, I Googled it and here is the definition of Rationalization - hope it helps

                          In psychology and logic, rationalization (also known as making excuses[1]) is an unconscious defense mechanism in which perceived controversial behaviors or feelings are logically justified and explained in a rational or logical manner in order to avoid any true explanation, and are made consciously tolerable – or even admirable and superior – by plausible means.[2] Rationalization encourages irrational or unacceptable behavior, motives, or feelings and often involves ad hoc hypothesizing. This process ranges from fully conscious (e.g. to present an external defense against ridicule from others) to mostly subconscious (e.g. to create a block against internal feelings of guilt).

                          People rationalize for various reasons. Rationalization may differentiate the original deterministic explanation of the behavior or feeling in question.[3][4] Sometimes rationalization occurs when we think we know ourselves better than we do. It is also an informal fallacy of reasoning.[5]

                            #17.7 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:15 PM EDT

                            Ralph, we know that the helicopter and crew were on a routine mission because we read the article. It's detailed in the second sentence. Scroll up and read it again, I'll wait.

                            I'll save judgment as to how big a deal it was until they release details like the scope of the mission, if the mission was impacted as a result of this action, how far out of the flight path they went, and other such things that weren't mentioned, but are huge factors in determining the impact to standard operations/waste of resources before I speculate on what punishment, if any, I deem appropriate.

                            • 1 vote
                            #17.8 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:59 PM EDT
                            Reply

                            Wow- we can thank morons like this for our service members not having the tools/equipment/supplies they need. This little stunt cost money - at the expense of thetaxpayers. The kid and his father both should have to shell out the cost of this little escapade (and the father should be fired from his cushy, well paying government job).

                            • 4 votes
                            Reply#18 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:05 PM EDT

                            rswall,

                            Our troops did not have the supplies they needed for a number of reasons. The need was not foreseen, delays in production of the goods, interruptions in the transport chain (as when Pakistan shut its borders), failure of contractors to properly complete their work in a timely fashion, or failure of the military chain of command to fulfill its obligations. Often, the chain of command, facing material shortages, had to allocate those materials (meaning not everyone got armor upgrades as quickly). These are always a consequence of war. But not one of the reasons had anything to do with government waste anywhere else in the federal budget. Trust me, the Pentagon wastes enough of its own money to figure how to get what it really needs.

                              #18.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:48 PM EDT
                              Reply

                              few things are ever black and white. but dont let that stop anyone from jumping to a conclusion and looking for a rope and a lynching tree.

                              if the pilot fired up the chopper and flew to the school for this stunt, that is one thing. if he was on a regulary scheduled patrol, and took a few minutes to veer out of his way and drop a stuffed animal, that is something else entirely. too bad that detail is omitted.

                              so save your ire until you know the whole story. and while you are at it, you might lighten up. in case anyone missed it, we have bigger issues confronting us.

                              • 6 votes
                              Reply#19 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:09 PM EDT

                              I'm glad that whoever planned it, had time to plan to make something special for their child, but federal regulations state that, "At no time will a publically owned vehicle be used for private functions, unless authorized by a superior."

                              Are you telling me the guy had his superiors permission to do this little stunt?

                              Seriously? Armed forces personel, are not allowed to use military vehicles as POV's. Neither is the Police Department, or Fire Department, and ambulance drivers, are not allowed to use emergency response vehicles as POV's.

                              Now here is a government helicopter being used as a POV. Under government charter, that's wrong. That's government memorandum. And i'm pretty sure this @!$%#, has written quite a few memorandums', in order to tell his subordinates not to use government vehicles as POV's. A car, van, truck, airplane, and helicopter under government auspices is a government vehicle. They are not POV's to be used at anyone's discretionary and arbitrary decisions against rules and regulations.

                              Look it up.

                              • 4 votes
                              Reply#20 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:11 PM EDT

                              I fail to understand why the border patrol needs a helicopter in New Jersey. Is it the New York or Pennsylvania border they're watching?

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#21 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:12 PM EDT

                              I would think that it's the Atlantic but who knows

                                #21.1 - Wed Sep 26, 2012 5:54 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                I hope the girl said "No"

                                • 3 votes
                                Reply#22 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:13 PM EDT

                                Parasites in Washington and Maryland? Really? I thought Border Patrol was supposed to be protecting us from terrorists and drugs and illegal entry. Wait, if you or I dropped a teddy bear from a helicopter, we would go to jail, then these same criminal feds would lock us up for violating 30 different laws. We pay for these blood sucking fleas of humanity.

                                • 5 votes
                                Reply#23 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:13 PM EDT

                                What is the big deal! The dad just wanted to do something cool for his son. No harm no foul, get over it people!

                                • 3 votes
                                Reply#24 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:15 PM EDT

                                you pay for it then!

                                • 3 votes
                                #24.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:27 PM EDT
                                Reply

                                So did she say yes or no?

                                • 2 votes
                                Reply#25 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:15 PM EDT

                                I was wondering the same thing... "yes" or "no"

                                  #25.1 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:29 PM EDT

                                  I was also wondering this. You'd think they would have said something. I suppose the reason for this article was meant to piss people off.

                                  At our highschool we used to have a helicopter fly in the football field every year for ROTC kids for fun. Until 9/11.

                                    #25.2 - Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:20 PM EDT
                                    Reply
                                    Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 5
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.