Winter storms to be named by Weather Channel

The Weather Channel plans to name severe winter storms beginning this year. NBC's Al Roker reports.

During the upcoming 2012-13 winter season, The Weather Channel will name noteworthy winter storms. Our goal is to better communicate the threat and the timing of the significant impacts that accompany these events. The fact is, a storm with a name is easier to follow, which will mean fewer surprises and more preparation.


Hurricanes and tropical storms have been given names since the 1940s. In the late 1800s, tropical systems near Australia were named as well. Weather systems, including winter storms, have been named in Europe since the 1950s. Important dividends have resulted from attaching names to these storms:

  • Naming a storm raises awareness.
  • Attaching a name makes it much easier to follow a weather system’s progress.
  • A storm with a name takes on a personality all its own, which adds to awareness.
  • In today’s social media world, a name makes it much easier to reference in communication.
  • A named storm is easier to remember and refer to in the future.

Related: Check Out the New Storm Names for the 2012-2013 Season

The question then becomes: “Why aren’t winter storms named?” In fact, in Europe the naming of weather systems has been going on for a long time. Here in the U.S., summer time storms including thunderstorms and tornadoes occur on such a small time and space scale that there would be little benefit and much confusion trying to attach names to them. However, winter weather is different. Winter storms occur on a time and space scale that is similar to tropical systems.

weather.com

In fact, historically many major winter storms have been named during or after the event has occurred. Examples include “The President’s Day Storm” and “Snowmageddon.” Yet, until now, there has been no organized naming system for these storms before they impact population centers.

One of the reasons this may be true is that there is no national center, such as the National Hurricane Center, to coordinate and communicate information on a multi-state scale to cover such big events. The National Centers for Environmental Prediction’s Hydrologic Prediction Center (HPC) does issue discussions and snowfall forecasts on a national scale but it does not fill the same role as the NHC in naming storms. Therefore, it would be a great benefit for a partner in the weather industry to take on the responsibility of developing a new concept.   

This is where a world-class organization such as The Weather Channel will play a significant role. We have the meteorological ability, support and technology to provide the same level of reporting for winter storms that we have done for years with tropical weather systems. 

In addition to providing information about significant winter storms by referring to them by name, the name itself will make communication and information sharing in the constantly expanding world of social media much easier.  As an example, hash tagging a storm based on its name will provide a one-stop shop to exchange all of the latest information on the impending high-impact weather system.

Related: Cantore's Famous "Thunder Snow" Video  |  Recalling Snowtober 2011

There will be many differences from the “tropical model” for naming winter storms. Unlike tropical systems, winter weather takes place at latitudes under extreme energy and forcing from the atmosphere.

Often a weather system that is expected to strike a metropolitan area three days from now has not even completely formed in the atmosphere. Therefore, naming of winter storms will be limited to no more than three days before impact to ensure there is moderate to strong confidence the system will produce significant effects on a populated area. In addition, the impacts from winter systems are not as simple to quantify as tropical systems where a system is named once the winds exceed a certain threshold. 

The process for naming a winter storm will reflect a more complete assessment of several variables that combine to produce disruptive impacts including snowfall, ice, wind and temperature. In addition, the time of day (rush hour vs. overnight) and the day of the week (weekday school and work travel vs. weekends) will be taken into consideration in the process the meteorological team will use to name storms.

This is an ambitious project. However, the benefits will be significant. Naming winter storms will raise the awareness of the public, which will lead to more pro-active efforts to plan ahead, resulting in less impact and inconvenience overall. 

Coordination and information sharing should improve between government organizations as well as the media, leading to less ambiguity and confusion when assessing big storms that affect multiple states. It will even make it easier and more efficient for social media to communicate information regarding the storm resulting in a better informed public. And, on the occasion that different storms are affecting separate parts of the country, naming storms will allow for clearer communications.

Finally, it might even be fun and entertaining and that in itself should breed interest from our viewing public and our digital users. For all of these reasons, the time is right to introduce this concept for the winter season of 2012-13.

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

 

 

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4 5 6

How aabout; Dancer, Prancer, Donder and Blitzen/ And don't forget Rudolph. (can't remember all 8)

  • 1 vote
Reply#43 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:06 PM EDT

The names are:

  • Dasher
  • Dancer
  • Prancer
  • Vixen
  • Comet
  • Cupid
  • Donner
  • Blitzen
  • Rudolf
  • 1 vote
#43.1 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:25 PM EDT

....there's comet and vixen in there someplace....

    #43.2 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:27 PM EDT
    Reply

    Are you kidding me? This is news worthy? This is what meteorologists are paid to do?

    Fu**ing idiots.

      Reply#44 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:06 PM EDT

      The local paper in Grand Forks, ND has been naming winter storms for at least 15 years...one only needs to "google" the term Blizzard Hannah to find one of the most devastating ice storms to hit the region.

        Reply#45 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:09 PM EDT

        OH yeah!!!! Well I bet you never had a Blizzard Iago, did you? That's what I thought.....these guys want to give you ND folks a little culture with your 10 foot snow drifts.....no more namby pamby names like Hannah....

          #45.1 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:25 PM EDT
          Reply

          We have a names for snowstorms in North Dakota..We call them WINTER!!

          • 2 votes
          Reply#46 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:09 PM EDT

          Same here in Wisconsin!! Get a grip people. Yes, storms can be bad, but naming them doesn't change a thing, not with todays fast communication. Agreed....it's called winter!!

          • 2 votes
          #46.1 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:19 PM EDT
          Reply

          Good. Maybe it will help people to not wait until the storm arrives before clearing shelves of bread and milk until the last minute, when they won't possibly be resupplied for days after a large storm, but could be re-stocked if people didn't wait until the last second!

            Reply#47 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:09 PM EDT

            I think it is a good idea, it is better then Snomageddon 1,2,3. I live in Virginia, which is not cold enough to snow most of the times, but we get nasty Northeasters, which dumps down rain and as bad as a hurricane. We had a Northeaster one November had to call in work because the roads were flooded.

              Reply#48 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:11 PM EDT

              Wonder what impact this will have with the insurance companies? Currently if there is a "named storm" the homeowever is responsible for a certain% above and beyond deductable. This really only pertained to hurricanes, but now I wonder if they will use this as another way to make homeowners pay more.

              • 1 vote
              Reply#49 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:13 PM EDT

              Dumb idea....names are even worse. Time for Cantore and Abrams to go!!!

              • 1 vote
              Reply#50 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:14 PM EDT

              "Our goal is to better communicate the threat and the timing of the significant impacts that accompany these events."

              Seriously??? With today's' technology of incredibly fast communication, the only way to 'better communicate' is by naming these events?? What about the 'many, many' mishaps of predicting these winter storms that then fizzle out?? (As in one prediction of rain here in the Midwest one year in the month May that ended up with 17 inches of snow here, locally. Guess they could have named that 'Fail'.) The idea is just plain stupid and I also agree with Serpen, the insurance companies are chomping at the bit on this one.
              Stupid, stupid!!

              • 2 votes
              Reply#51 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:15 PM EDT

              quibble, quibble....see, you're the fool for expecting them to know what they are talking about....when you don't know what you are talking about, you change the subject....in this case to naming storms, rather than accurately predicting them. This all mak'ng sense now?

                #51.1 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:21 PM EDT
                Reply

                Khan: Mongolian conqueror and emperor of the Mongol empire.

                Where do they get these idiots? Khan is a TITLE, not a person.

                khan/kän/

                Noun:

                1. A title given to rulers and officials in central Asia, Afghanistan, and certain other Muslim countries.
                2. (in the Middle East) An inn for travelers, built around a central courtyard.
                • 1 vote
                Reply#52 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:17 PM EDT

                absolute garbage ~ now they will name the storm ~ the most horrific snowstorm ever will end up being 2" of slughy mess ~ meanwhile the forecast slughy mix will dump 28" of snow ~ start out unnamed, then go from there ~ what a lame idea. I love the weather channel and all, but i think the weather has already reached the limits of what reality or entertainment TV should be for weather~ When will the first weather related reality show kick off?

                • 1 vote
                Reply#53 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:17 PM EDT

                this is the dummest idea i have ever heard of, lets start naming tornados,, how about naming nice days too

                • 1 vote
                Reply#54 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:18 PM EDT

                If the National Weather Service has not deemed this to be a problem, I fail to see why NBC (owner of Weather Channel) feels it necessary. Neither did Landmark Communications, who started the Weather Channel in the early 80's. I guess since NBC can't put together a line up that people will watch, they feel the need to try and find themselves in other ways.

                Wait, I have an idea.....why not place your energy into getting more accurate forecasts to your viewers?

                • 2 votes
                Reply#55 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:22 PM EDT

                First Winter Stormed should be named after Barrack - Name It: BO (Blizzard Oooooo)

                Chiily Willie

                Frosty The Snow Storm

                Hillary

                Janet

                Ice Tea

                Mohammad The Killer

                Frozen Mullahs

                Dan - Druff

                  Reply#56 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:28 PM EDT

                  Yogi? and they left out Boo Boo. Great idea!!! all cartoon names--Sponge Bob, Porky, Bugs, Goofey, etc.

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#57 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:28 PM EDT

                  Obama will probably make a speech declaring that the US is not, and never has been at war with Nature.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#58 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:29 PM EDT

                  I bet they dont name it untill it comes and goes as much as they miss the forecasts.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#59 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:29 PM EDT

                  Name one storm SpongeBob, go on, i dare you!

                  • 2 votes
                  Reply#60 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:32 PM EDT

                  How about just plain doing abtter job of predicting them. I could care less what they are called.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#61 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:35 PM EDT

                  I think this is a good idea. I'm wondering, though, whether the area of the storm will affect whether it is major enough to be named. Hurricanes/tropical storms have the category 1-4 scale that is the same no matter where the storm is located. Snow/ice storms, on the other hand, have variable severity depending on where they hit. I had a friend in Florida who said that one time, they had a storm that dumped three inches of snow and it was a huge deal - people stayed off the roads, schools were closed, etc, because that type of weather isn't common there and nobody is used to it or prepared for it. A three-inch snowfall in New England (where I live) is just another day, business continues as usual. Will region affect whether a winter storm is significant enough for a name?

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#62 - Tue Oct 2, 2012 12:38 PM EDT
                  Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.