A man fatally shot his ex-girlfriend and their 3-year-old son and wounded three others at a northwest Ohio apartment complex before being shot to death by police, authorities said.
The shootings stemmed from a domestic dispute Tuesday night at the Eastpointe on the Mall apartment complex in Lake Township, the Toledo Blade reported.
Police said Jorge Duran Jr. 24, of Toledo, shot five people in two apartments before going outside. He was confronted by officers and was killed in an exchange of gunfire, Lake Township police said Wednesday, according to The Associated Press.
Watch US News crime videos on NBCNews.com
Killed at the apartments were his ex-girlfriend, Amber Jones, 26, and their 3-year-old son, Jorge Duran III, The Toledo Blade reported. A 39-year-old man, a 26-year-old man and a 45-year-old woman were also shot but survived, the newspaper said.
Police did not release the names or any other information about the survivors.
More content from NBCNews.com:


And here we see a prime example of the difference between the sexes. When a woman gets dumped, she goes out and gets five pints of Ben and Jerry's; when a man gets dumped, he goes out and gets a GUN.
...Sounds like you must get dumped a lot.
Actually do you watch ID? Most of those shows are about women killing their husbands.
Yep that's why every time there's a breakup, someone gets killed. Genius post.
Ban handguns.
yah, ban hand guns, because they are always getting up off the table of their own free will, and running after people to kill them.
Takenaka - you really don't want to go there!!! Your Government will control you from cradle to grave and everywhere in between when gun are outlawed. And how does that go again, When guns are outlawed, only the outlaws will have guns. And then they can stop by and rob you anytime day or night and you wouldn't be able to do a thing about it. And about the second time they stop by they'll shoot you dead so you can't testify against them in a court of law. I want my personal protection!!! It's the law!!!
My car is just waiting to start up and kill someone!
And you have a license for that also, go for it. But don't bend over or will all die!!!
Ban handguns, that's brilliant. Handguns were banned from the Columbine Campus, and the college campus in Virgina: Yeah, that worked.
Handguns and their possesion are banned in Chicago and yet they average about 10 to15 BANNED HANDGUN homicides EVERY weekend, not to mention another 50 to 60 shootings in the same weekend time frame. Yeah, ban handguns. That will do it!
What a maroon.
jOCKMAMA....You are so right!! I get tired of hearing about how these men get so stupid ...what do they think they own us or something??? All they can think about is violencecell.....I would like to know what men would really do without us WOMEN!!!! They cant survive!! They get all pissed off and violent....It's sickening....
mike, do you read? You shouldn't be citing TV shows. Men commit 59% of the murders against their girlfriends or wives. Any fool who reads the news must notice that it is most often men being arrested for murder or attempted murder. What a stupid, STUPID statement. "Gee well duh on I.D. I saw..."
And what a surprise he would have had when he showed up to shoot her and her child, if instead of throwing an empty quart of Ben & Jerry's, she had armed herself and shot the SoB. Gun control is one sided in favor of those that control who has the gun. If you don't take advantage of your right you will be trampled under by those that know you have abdicated that right. There should be 1 person dead and that should be the one who came to kill a mother and her child. Evil exists, and to think otherwise is the wisdom of a fool. The choice of to be alive to feel, sad, remorseful, nothing at all or what ever or be maimed or killed by that evil is yours and yours alone. Not any level of government should have the power to tell you if you may or may not protect yourself or others against anything that threatens your safety. Your right to live in peace is inseparable from your right to breath. To rely on someone else for your security usually ends badly as they have to get to where you are and that is usually too long. When seconds count the police are minutes away.
Just going back a few months:
July 22, 2012 - Waldoboro, Maine - Woman shoots sleeping boyfriend in the back of the head and then shoots herself in the face and survives. Woman tells police she was scared her boyfriend was going to break up with her.
August 3, 2012 - Juneau, AK - Mistress of a man who had broken up with her to reconcile with his wife is ambushed returning home with his wife. The mistress shoots the man killing him and shoots the wife several times. The mistress then tells the wife "we will all burn in hell" and turns the gun on herself. Despite taking 43 minutes for help to arrive the wife survives.
August 7, 2012 - Carlsbad, Ca - Woman shoots husband in the heart at point blank range, tells her kids who may have witnessed the killing "daddy fell out of a chair" and takes them out for sandwiches. Woman has not revealed her motive, friends and coworkers of the husband say he wanted out of the marriage.
October 12, 2012(not sure about the exact date) - Highland Heights, Ky - Woman shoots boyfriend because he was trying to end the relationship, the man was a young lawyer gaining momentum in his community and had dreams of becoming a senator.
The list could be longer if I went back farther, but you seem to be almost correct about one thing jockmama, men get the gun afterwards, most women get the gun and commit the action before the breakup has taken place. Actions depend on the person, not the gender. I've been dumped and done the dumping, I can't speak for the Ben and Jerry's but I've never had the impulse to go get a gun. When I've been dumped I go for 5 pints of beer and the first girl to make eye-contact with me. Maybe you should take a look at yourself and realize how you have handled getting dumped, coming to a public forum and spouting ignorance, sexism and bigotry about the opposite sex.
funny you say that considering i just read a local article about some rag that shot her ex boyfriend in the head a couple of days ago...
Guns kill people
Alcohol kills people
Vehicles kill people
War kills people
Me thinks we have a people problem..
My condolences to the families.
@Riverboy21. Well said.
Women thought that equality meant equality in all things, including sex. But our society, the government, and the powers that be, would tolerate none of that. They betrayed women just like they betrayed men. Equality meant that women would not be equal with men, just the same as men. Same sh*tty life. Same deadend career. Same broken promises. Same out-sourced job. Same in-sourced replacement. And if women didn't like it then they would remind themselves that in a globalized world their failure to complete could be matched by millions of women everywhere that could compete . . . compete for their men first.
Always entertaining to hear the cons freak out about their guns. Maybe if you imbeciles would stop promoting guns, 'mistakes' like this would never happen, and the conversation about gun control would never come up, because there would be no reason to. Please start educating yourselves on the proper responsibility and behavior of owning and using a gun.
btj89
kind of odd, when the 1st comment posted, is usually from a liberal on any related topic to this crying for the ban/destruction of anything that makes a loud noise, lol. but then there is the audacity to point the finger the other direction, to try and of course... look innocent right?
btj89, you are not even close to 1/2 right. You imbecileic libs would be screaming to get rid of the knives, swords, spears, golf clubs and ball bats that had replaced the gun. The meek would still be at the mercy of those that will do evil regardless of the implement. Their desire to harm is not because of the tool they use. Please start educating yourself on the reason for the need to defend oneself. The responsibility and behavior of those that would harm unarmed individuals is where you need to look to control. Morals, ethics and values need to be the focus of education and not the liberal mantra of anything goes and don't judge me I can do what ever I feel. And the evil would still have the guns. I hope you have a good place to cower in fear.
Nice rack Lindsay!
Amazing what people will do in the heat of the moment. People have killed their spouses, their exes, their babies, even stabbed their own dog because they get too heated and explode! What an idiot! He had his whole life ahead of him, as did his ex and their baby, and now all 3 are dead, for what! He might have met someone next week that would have made him wonder why he ever gave two craps about his ex! People need to learn to live and let live. This is sickening. I think anger management should be taught by the time kids graduate high school. We've all "lost it" at one time or another. It should be mandatory to take at least one class, same as sex-ed and drunk driving presentations.
Ben & Jerry's works for me.
If guns are smart enough to know not to get up off the table and shoot someone - then how come they are not smart enough to let a hot-head own it? Some of the Pro gun comments seem to be coming from hot-heads - all that Lib this and meek that, you only hurt your argument for the right to own guns.
Hot-heads kill with guns - I think I heard your smart gun telling you to go to anger management classes.
Another tragedy, another opportunity for for the paranoid gun nuts to spew their bull$h!t.
But, after all the tears and all the paranoia, it's just another law abiding gun owner who got tired of abiding.
Patchy- hope your arrogant comment wasn't aimed at me. I do not own a gun and never have. Perhaps I may one day, but have never needed one and have no idea why some people think they need to own 50. My comment was regarding hatred and anger, and how it needs to get under control in this country. Period.
so yea, to the NRA guys here defending your right to own guns(which i fully support)
1. Gun control isnt about taking our guns away. its about trying to ensure scum like this guy do not get a weapon of mass destruction. betcha he has some sort of record of violence....and yes i include guns in that phrase=)
2. im being serious now...what defense do you have for keeping those dandy little toys that can mow down an entire floor of a shopping mall, before reloading, on xmas eve. just wondering
I dont understand point 1 in your comment....please explain.
1 single shot will stop a person with one of those dandy little toys so that point doesnt really work either.
grillizle spantoin plebisite
lol to all the man hating women on this vine. i have had alot of break ups and have yet to gone violent on the women. hell usually im like thank god time to hit a bar and grab some strange was getting bored with the samo samo. the truth is i think that is the case with most men.
here4eternity you do realize that if you have a record of violence you can not legally buy a firearm. whenever you buy a firearm, they take all your info, fill out paperwork, check your ID then call it into the FBI hotline for a computer check on you. the firearm that you buy is also federally registered to you for any future record checks. you dont get the gun untill you are cleared from them. so if this guy had a history of violence, he did not get the gun thru legal means.
Jockmam - you're absolutely right. women generally just eat ice cream and then drown their children afterwards.
When men kill their wives, they actually face a punishment for it.
Women can kill their kids and a husband and often get away with it because it is more difficult to convict a b-tch than a dude.
Amos; I gave you a vote...I like most of your comments :)
After several years of posting serious comments on this topic - all I have left is sarcasm. Most gun owners are not of the same ilk as the pro gun people who post here...lots of wanna be cowboys here - too much John Wayne.
No, Eric, you can obtain a firearm through the myriad of "gun shows" even if you have a record. Backround checks should be expanded to all gun transactions. The right to bear arms also carries the responsibility to own and transfer ownership safely. I am a supporter of the the right to bear arms but I also don't see that right to own weapons that are military grade by individuals. Also, from my personal experience, the people most fervent about owning guns are usually the type that really shouldn't own them.
For all of those that think everyone should be armed, you are just as foolish as those that think all guns should be banned. There would not be less violence, just more innocent bystanders being shot.
sex doesn't matter, crazy is crazy....now riverboy go back a couple months and show us how many you come up with that are males killing ex wives and ex girlfriends....bet there's a difference...I say man or woman lock them up and throw away the key!! Even worse when you read they killed their own child...that deserves immediate death in my eyes!
getagrip1, you are suspended for a week for violating rule # 1 of the Code of Honor.
He killed their 3 year old son. What kind of person could do such a thing?
A Democrat. God be with the family.
A Crazy. A Republican. But I repeat myself.
A dumocrat. Nuff said.
Maybe she was cheating on him. Maybe while cheating on him she got herself knocked-up by another man. Maybe he found out that "his" son was "somebody else's." Maybe the gun that shot his ex-girlfriend and 3-year-old boy was fired with somebody else's bullets.
Maybe, maybe, maybe. Maybe he was attacked by a vicious three-year-old democrat.
Technically the family doesn't exist anymore. But I get what you're saying: A non-existent being with a non-existent family.
self centered SOB
While Obama wanted to talk about the “other part of the equation” with reference to new sources of energy compared to coal and oil during the debate, he failed to bring up just how much has been lost by the American people through investments in failed “green” companies which were a part of the wasteful spending that was nearly $800 billion in stimulus money.
It appears that these alternative energy sources should be pursued with private funds, not taxpayer dollars. Then if it fails, it’s all on the investors, not the taxpayers. I wonder if A123 will come under the same criminal investigation as Solyndra
Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/10/another-of-obamas-green-energy-stimulus-recipients-goes-bust/#ixzz29ball6zI
@ counterfeit president: If we had followed your advice about alternate methods of wired communication, your post would not exist and the world would be a tad more intelligent.
Maybe you leave the politics out of it when talking about the murder of a 3 year old child...
This guy, at that moment, was not a liberal or a conservative, democrat or a republican. He was a child murderer...
Why are there more and more of these killings? Because our country is going nuts from this political / economic / gender / divisive Bull Sh**t
Blamee - There is no "maybe" in the universe that is sufficient justification for a man to shoot and kill a 3 year old child. None.
unfortunantly when my friend came back from iraq, he found out his wife was 3 months pregnant while he was gone for a year. i volunteered to extend my tour so he could get back on time. when he got home he shot, his wife their daugher and hisself. sometimes things just happen to make a person snap. i know he dearly loved his wife and daughter. he kept talking about how he couldnt wait to get home to be with them, that is what was keeping it together for him while over there.
Life is a b!tch sometimes.
and then you marry one....
jersey girl, stifle your wop comments, eyetalian moron.
Wopamania is a way of life in Jersey just ask their hero Ford Fairlane!
That's too funny Doc. LMAO.
A democrap who already voted, we just are trying to figure out how many times.
Your right all that rampant voter fraud which exists in Republicans heads.
@ howhegotnowhere:-nope, you ignorant schmuck, as the ron paul fans have pointed out, voter fraud exists primarily in the GOPiggie primaries.
There has to be drug or alcohol abuse involved. This goes beyond crazy.
Um, it's called domestic violence. It's about power and control, not drugs and alcohol.
I read the BLADE online every day. I lived way too many years in Toledo. It was long enough to witness a steady slide into increased unemployment and economic misery, the decline in public services, rampant gang activity and more. And what I see every day about arson of abandoned houses, violence against strangers and domestic violence is appalling. This is sad. Maybe drugs involved, certainly other elements, too. Toledo may focus these events but they happen too regularly elsewhere, too.
As soon as a problem arises the first thing an individual does who has access to a gun (because they're far too many in this country) is think the problem can be solved by using that gun. Five people shot, likely some will die, all because the gun nuts and gun manufacturers are flooding the society with them. These kinds of mass killings by gun are happening more and more now almost everyday around the country. We need to ban guns in the U.S. then maybe we'll have a homicide by gun death rate life other civilized countries--"0".
The difference between killing someone with a gun and not killing somebody with a gun is education. Gun safety, gun training, fear of the final act of shooting somebody, getting caught and the long ugly trial and then you hang. That's what needs to be stressed, is you kill you die!!! None of this twenty years with parole because the jails are so crowded. Naa!!! Gun registration could help, at least gangsters would have to prove why their packing. You know stop and ask!!! If i'm legal what do i care? But you don't want a government that has taken your rights of owning a gun away. The little tin hat they'll put on your head then will make you go were ever they want!!! Oh by the way you make to much money, were going to raise your taxes!!!! Sucker!!!
Do you really believe this guy was worried about getting caught? Talking about tougher penalties is just as fruitless as talking about banning guns. Any person who would kill his own son had no concern about consequences. If you could have threatened him with ten different death penalties it wouldn't have changed his actions in the least. He was typical of the kind of thinking that says, "If I can't have them no one can." As for consequences, it was suicide by cop, otherwise he would have surrendered. He didn't care about dying. His only goal was killing. That's the kind of person he was.
Jean Valjean,
Everytime there is a problem someone kills someone with a gun? What? Are you as nutty as you sound? How can you be shrill on a bulletin board posting? How many guns are "too many"?
I know, you are another liberal and could not possibly care less about a constitutional right that Americans have. Do remember that guns made this nation and have protected it for over two centuries.
If you are looking for something to ban because there are too many of them, try banning cars.
Oh, and, get a job.
Hey Jean, my suggestion if you think those other countries are so great......move there
Jean is a government employee! He knows in the not so distant future, we're going to be coming for him, his boss and all the stolen money. Cowards always stand behind big brother! He'll be under his kids bed, if you're looking for him! He lives in his own little world, where he can piss in his pants if he wants to!! I know a pathetic government a$$ kisser when I hear one.....just sayin!
It is bad enough when one person thinks they have the "right" to hurt/kill another adult, but NO ONE has the right to take their anger out on a child!! Just because you have contibuted your egg or sperm to create a child does not give you the right to turn around and kill it. This sorry way of thinking is not imited to men, women are just as bad, if not worse. How anyone could look at an innocent child and kill it is beyond sick, it is the worst form of evil on our planet.
Definition of a Liberal- An individual who believes in freedom to the maximum. In other words its an individual who believes in having as many individual freedoms as possible. I had to clarify because people really keep using the word incorrectly. This means that liberals do believe in individuals rights to bear arms. I am a liberal. I fully support the second amendment. In fact I fully support all of our constitutional rights and freedoms. I know for a fact we all need guns for self-protection.
This story is very tragic and I really hate this happened. It really is sad. He should have just left her alone. If she didn't want him anymore then he shouldve just moved on and found somebody else. If this was the scenario. I dont know for sure because in the story they did not say. Im not going to assume anything. Its really sad. However I do agree with the poster on here that said this is really sad because the next week he couldve met somebody else that made him ever wonder why he was even hung up on his ex in the first place. I fully agree. 100%. That poster was right on.
I do not think that more gun control is the answer. We do not need stricter gun control laws. We need to enforce the ones that are already on the books and in place. Thats all. So all you gun control freaks can stop sprouting your bull@!$%#. As I've sated so many times before, if really hate the fact that we have and we embrace the second amendment, you can always leave and go to a country where there citizens are not allowed to own guns. As matter of facts there are countries where their citizens cant even voice their opinion of a government official, so if you want to live like this, you are free to leave this country anytime you want. Thank you.
jean its been proven that gun laws like that dont work. look at england/germany they have just as many per capita gun murders as the US and the strict gun laws there. you can ban guns all day long and criminals will still get ahold of them unfortunantly.
There is no answer yet to the question of: "Why Canada with the same count of firearms per capita than USA has a way lower rate of killings and injuries by firearms than the USA?"
Please do not joke around by suggesting that they use hatchets, knives, or alikes instead.
genius!!! let the stupid people find whatever they can to hurt others, which i'm sure they would... just freaking genius... *facepalm*
GREAT, ban handguns and black market hand grenades go on sale...not that I would know.
Evidently that person knows nothing about gun control: use BOTH hands, idiot.
Hey gun control is hitting your target.
The US doesn't have a gun problem. We have a moral problem.
Well said. I agree completely. It seems like this guy would have killed her and his son in any manner. If he didn't have a gun, then he would have strangled them, or used a knife or some other nefarious means. He just happened to use a gun. Anyone who can kill a 3 year old child has moral issues. Anyone who can kill anyone in cold blood has moral issues.
bingo, Moose 69! Its a moral issue that has stemmed from a Godless society.
That begins with the parents acting as young sexual promiscuous individuals allowing their daughters to show as much skin as possible, experiment with drugs, legal or not and believing "feelings" are a guide to life. Democrats support Unions, abortions on demand, government provided birth control devices, gays and lesbians public exhibitions, same sex marriages, government from cradle to grave benefits, distribution of wealth, and deviation from our civil social culture traits. Practicing a life without GOD is living without social order.
kota "light in the crotch" uses two fingers, his moms.
What?
Surprised the PC left isn't on here hating on the cops for "violating his civil rights"
Anyone- man, woman, black, white, dem., rep. can kill. We all have our seasons of ups and downs, upbringings, etc.. Banning guns will never happen- the pendlum has swung hard in the 2A favor. Forget that. The US has an excess of freedoms- AND remember the comment as a kid- "You are spoiled?" That's us. Spoiled. The lawsuit case-load is in overload because of whiney babies who have had their poor little freedoms tarnished. Discipline is the other jewel in the US that is gone. Goodbye USA as we know it.
I kind of agree with you, but...too much freedom? Huh?
Everyone who knows you will remember you as that guy who murdered a 3 year old boy...way to make your family proud you piece of s**t.
I already see comments on banning firearms.. Must be obama supporters.
A firearm/ Gun is a tool and depending on how it is used it can be good or unpleasant, it all comes down to the person and how they used it. It is not the fault of the gun but the gun operator.
It should be where anyone that does not have a felony on their record and that is mentally stable should be able to openly carry a firearm. Crime rates would drop as criminals wouild not know who was armed and who was not.
You sir, are an idiot and sycophant with those NRA kill a NiGRA attitudes that tore this country in half before the first Civil War. Keep it up and there will be a second one and this time WE the PEOPLE gotta SHIP YER ASS OFF TO AFRICA SO YOU GET OVER YER RACE PREJUDICE, GO INSANE, COMMIT SUICIDE OR GET SHOT DOWN BY THE POLICIA FOR COMMITTING MURDER AND MAYHEM AND BEING EXECUTED FOR IT THERE! EDUCATION IS NOT GONNA REHAB PEOPLE LIKE YOU ~ MANY OF US ALREADY REALIZE THAT TRUTH!
What? He is a racist because he wants to have guns? "Policia"? Where are you? Are you hallucinating?
Look, nutjob, hate the USA and the Constitution all you want but keep your bigoted, ignorant, and I do mean IGNORANT, crap to yourself. Ok? Ok.
Oh, and get a job. Please do not have kids
I think they're supporters of the Mormon idiot not Obama supporters that are trying to ban guns. Mitt the twit was for it before he was against it this morning who knows what his position will be this afternoon.
I don't know if I agree with the open carry, but I do know on thing.....doc is a dumbass
@Nailer45. First off, I am an Obama supporter and I fully support the second amendment. Secondly, it is already illegal for a felon to own a gun. You really need to brush up on our gun laws. Now the last comment about about the mentally stable owning a gun, I agree to a certain extent. That will not necessarily stop a handgun from ending up in the wrong hands. Perfectly sane people own guns and use them as weapons all the time. That will not work. You will have to come up with another suggestion. Not even checking and testing to see if an individual has a criminal background would/will prevent gun crimes from happening or would/will stop guns from ending up in the wrong hands. The people that committed these past mass shooting in the previous months were law abiding citizens with no criminal history. There is no test that they could perform to ever stop a gun from ending up in the wrong hands. Thats real. Its the truth. As with everything else, there will always be somebody who wants to break laws and do wrong inspite of how they've been raised and what they've been taught. Its just real talk. Evil people will always exist.
nailer 45 its not obama that you have to worry about with gun control, its romney. obama's voting record has shown that he is not in favor of gun control. romney's voting record has shown that he is hugely in favor of gun control. the three laws he made in mass. where very harsh gun control laws that did nothing to keep guns out of the criminals hands. while also being costly in the pocket book of sportsman and gun owners. while obama voted yes on repealing the assaut rifle ban, and pushed for reciprocal carry while concealed liscenses between the states. you really need to take some time to look up the real facts of the candidates records.
you do realize that the brady institute that pushes for gun control and banning of firearms grade our politicians on favorability towards gun control. they rate obama as an F, they rate romney as an A, for gun control.
Murder is wrong. All of these posts about MEN and Guns are wrong also. Lucretia Borgia was a female but dudn't use a gun. Lizzy Borden used an axe..... Jack the Ripper may have been a she-male. No gun.
People kill people. Hussein used poison gas. People will use whatever weapon is handy when the time occurs. It is not the weapon, but people.
Here is an example of what happens when mental hospitals were closed under Reagan and now all of the mental/emotional druggies live in apartment complexes with elderly and older people because there are no jobs and they are dependent on parents and grandparents for home, sustenance and money. This has become the norm for Amerikan families due to 28 years of Repubs lieing and pretending they and their policies aren't destroying what once was a great Nation! This type of violence is symptomatic of economic, social and political indifference and stupidity beginning with Nixon up thru Bush Jr. and now here comes Romney with more of the same! Rich and stupid go together like Abbott and Costello! GOD HELP U.S.!
DOC,
You're nuts. Go check yourself in at a mental institution and stay there. I know you already can't vote, thank God. Too unstable.
Must have been an off-duty cop.
Im surprised his cop buddys shot him, they were probably aiming for the double-amputee in the wheelchair and missed.
Why must he have been an off-duty cop?
Hand guns have no purpose other than to kill. Most often, other than drug dealers shooting competing drug dealers, hand guns are turned on husband, wife, girlfriend or boyfriend. Seems as if every day there is a similar story published. We need some decent control over who can obtain these weapons. Gun violence is immediate. How often do you read about someone killing 6 or more people with a knife or baseball bat?
No, they are also good for self defense when your long guns are out of ammo.
Seems every day many are killed with cars (and that includes multiple deaths in cars), hammers, water, stairs, etc.. Ban them, right?
Sheesh.
That's not true, I discharged about 150 rounds out of my P226 this weekend, noone died or got hurt. I discharged about 80 rounds out of my AR, noone died or got hurt.
I had a lot of fun hitting the steel targets that swung around to the other side or tipped a bit standing themselves back up again. I also practiced a bit faster rate of fire to get used to it. Once again, noone died or got hurt even a scratch.
Looks like you are totally wrong.
NC-I'm all for banning some cars, or at least people from being able to drive. I'm terrified sometimes of driving out with other people because there are some crazy drivers! I would love to see things get stepped up so that not every idiot was able to drive. Old people, crazy teenage drivers, people who are repeatedly given DUI's that get their licenses given back to them, etc. I think after a certain amount of tickets you should have to just take public transportation or ride a bike. I know this doesn't really have anything to do with the story, but I've seen several posts on here using driving as an example and I say, yes! Ban some people from driving, just like we wouldn't let some people get guns!
Ready2change: I really take offense with the people you think should not be allowed to drive; teenagers, old people, etc. If someone has a good driving record, then why shouldn't they be allowed a license? Because you say so? I think fat people should not be allowed to purchase fast food; I think skinny people should have to double up on their fast food; I think short people should have to wear high heels; I think tall people should have to slouch down. Dumb? Yep, about as smart as your comments were. Get real...
THERE ARE TOO MANY STORIES LIKE THIS IN AMERICA EVERY DAYI!
I hope and pray the survivors find peace.
There are times and places where not carrying a large calibre handgun or shotgun can get you killed. Just the other day a man in Soldonna, Alaska saved himself from certain death when he was attacked by a huge,1000 lb, old brown bear. Handgun was a .458 Magnum (Casule maybe) It took all 6, 350 grain slugs to stop the raging bruin.
There are many valid reasons for an armed populace. When, not "if" the fit hits the shan, the unarmed citizens of this country won't stand a chance. There is even a case for being able to protect yourself from an out of control government or military run by a cabal of oligarchs. Self defense aside, feeding your family when the stores are empty when it all goes wrong, is going to be hard to do without a firearm or bows and arrows to put game on the table.
Never travel in bear country without a whistle and a can of pepper-spray, if you have the training and competence, better to have a flat-blaster.
More laws to keep handguns out of the hands of the angry or crazed in not a viable solution. Human life seems to have lost a lot of value, murdering anyone is crazy. Killing your own child is something I can't even begin to comprehend.
Soldotna, alaska
Guns are good for shooting deer or other animals for food
Why do they always have to kill the young ones. Just kill yourself and get it over.
exactly, just get to the problem.
It is so sad isn't it. Why are the children caught in the middle? There is a court case in Buffalo NY this week where a man is accused of killing his 10 year old son by binding him to a chair and beating him to death with a rolling pin. The boy's crime? Lad didn't get enough "A"s on his report card, disgraced his family is the dad's defence.
Now this is effective and expedient police work. Don't try to talk them down or capture them - take them out.
A 25 cent bullet compared to millions in court costs and housing for this murderer. This murderer will NEVER kill again seems like a just and fitting punishment to me.
Rich- It sounds to me like he was shooting at the police. They were supposed to what? Ask him to stop while bullets were flying? Jeez, give me a break. He deserved what he got.
I know he got what he deserved, ready. I was applauding the cops.
So sad that someone would take their anger to this level. An innocent child caught in the middle.
When it comes to acts of killing, it's not about anger. It's about rage, that "firm resolve" our grandmothers and grandfathers use to talk about. Now murder, murder is different. Murder is rage aggravated.
Guns are such an act of futility. That's why the government lets people keep them. When it comes right down to it, you only get off a few shots and then have to either shoot yourself in the head, or get yourself shot by the police. You don't want to go to prison. America is a pro when it comes to prisons. America has more prisons than anybody. Only a fool gets themselves arrested and shown off in a courtroom wearing orange hair. If the Mexican drug lords wanted to do a favor for the most depressed, the most needy and dependent Americans they would add C-4 and remote detonators to their import menu, and lots of it. Drugs only temper the urge to violence. Plastic explosives are the only real outlet for rage. Blowing something up. When that happens, our irresponsible and feckless government will "solve" the illegal immigrant problem real fast. You watch.
Why can't people like this just off themselves and leave it at that? Shooting his 3 year old son? i bet this guy was just misunderstood and a pleasure to be around! You decide your life sucks enough to off yourself thats fine. just leave everyone else out of it
It would seem there will be no Jorge Duran IV.
WHY is someone's murder or a murder ALWAYS about politics? You people are NUTS and if you didn't know, it's CONGRESS that holds the key to EVERYTHING!
The government doesn't hold the "key" to anything anymore. Our aging pretty boys and pretty girls take their orders from the powers that be and watch their bank accounts get fat with your money. Get with the program.
I have the key to your wifes chastity belt....
Well, there's TWO idiots (the blamee and weathermen)...any more?
are you excluding yourself? if not....you make it three!