4-star Gen. William 'Kip' Ward, former head of Africa command, demoted over lavish spending allegations

Fethi Belaid / AFP - Getty Images file

U.S. General William 'Kip' Ward speaks to reporters in Tunis in 2008.

A four-star general who formerly led the U.S. Africa Command has been demoted after accusations that he spent thousands of dollars on lavish travel, NBC News reported.

A senior defense official told NBC News that Gen. William "Kip" Ward was stripped of a star, and will be allowed to retire as a three-star lieutenant general.

According to a Defense Department Inspector General’s Report released in August, Ward took an 11-day trip to Washington and Atlanta, costing $129,000, in which only three days of the trip were official business. The military charged that Ward extended trips seven times for personal reasons and claimed and received reimbursement for expenses.


Ward was also accused of improperly bringing his wife along on government-paid trips — one of those included a seven-day mission to Bermuda — and her unauthorized use of armored vehicles.

Ward denied the allegations.

The Army is trying to recoup $82,000 from Ward, NBC News reported.

Ward’s demotion comes on the heels of revelations about retired Gen. David Petraeus, who resigned as director of the CIA, citing an extramarital affair. In addition, the Defense Department is investigating Gen. John Allen, commander of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, over allegations of “inappropriate” emails between him and the woman who sparked the Petraeus probe.

NBC News' Pentagon producer Courtney Kube contributed to this report.

Those who know the two women at the center of General David Petraeus' affair scandal are speaking out. Jill Kelley's brother says she is "dedicated" to her husband, while Paula Broadwell's friend calls her "a pretty great person." NBC's Kristen Welker reports.

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Discuss this post

Do we have generals, admirals who believe they have a god given right to abuse the system? When you have people who have access to large amounts of $ and power they arent used to being questioned. The military brass for the last decade has had few questioning its actions, folks give them a pass because of the war, perhaps that needs changed.

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:46 PM EST

Power corrupts humans, soon they rise above the Law and ethics. It's common.

  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:50 PM EST

The Army is trying to recoup $82,000 from Ward, NBC News reported.

Easy. Withhold it from his retirement.

  • 7 votes
#2.2 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:06 PM EST

square-they are just setting the example set by their boss.

  • 1 vote
#2.3 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:27 PM EST

...I am upset; expected more out of this and other genereals...these guys are typically absolute leaders of their jurisdictions, checked infrequently and reigning supremely...so seems to confirm, absolute power leads to absolute corruption.

...to the republic --- your comment is clearly uninformed, as well as others; any fool in the military or familiar with it, knows while the CINC is just that, these generals operate with autonomy...influenced less by the CINC, but more by the Military Code, privileges of rank and position, fear of subordinates to cross them, UCMJ and their own values, morals and ethics. Criminals don't give a hoot about laws, as liars, deviants or opportunists (like you) care that their misdirected assertions are rooted in fact.

    #2.4 - Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:20 AM EST

    privileges of rank and position

    As General Bruce Clarke said in his pamphlet on leadership and command "you weren't placed in command to exercise your idiosyncracies and take advantage of the perks of your position."

      #2.5 - Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:12 AM EST

      Easy. Withhold it from his retirement.

      Dishonorable discharge no retirement, no retirement benefits including medical.

        #2.6 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:44 PM EST
        Reply

        Is it coincidence or a purge? If a purge then it's a good sign that Obama is getting a grip on his captains, and might get ready to do something bigger in this society. It's part of the job we elected him for I suppose.

        • 3 votes
        Reply#3 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:48 PM EST

        "flexibility" to get rid of his opposition.

          #3.1 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 4:32 PM EST
          Reply

          Fak you sir a hole,Probally faked a 100 black tribal woman on the tax suckers dime

            Reply#4 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:49 PM EST

            Ha ha he he ho ho.

            Gen homie must go

              Reply#5 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:51 PM EST

              Some people just cannot seem to manage having power. I'd like to retire on a three star general's pension. What is that, about $9000 a month?

              • 2 votes
              Reply#6 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:04 PM EST

              KEEPING IT THOUGHTFULLY HONEST: Now we know why President Bush and those
              Senate Republicans during the conduct of those wars for weapons of mass destruction , kept telling to us, "let's “wait” to see what the Generals have to say
              with their thoughtful war strategies!" THE INCONVENIENT TRUTH: Apparently, the
              General were too busy taking care of their first business with their women socializing
              to set up their sexual dating priority arrangements and spending too! However, it does seem that they do have nice taste in the selection of attractive women and who knows what other hidden talents they may have! Hum…

              • 1 vote
              Reply#7 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:47 PM EST

              had he been enlisted he would have been ousted and would of not received any retirement. Once again a double standard in our military.

              • 3 votes
              Reply#8 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:53 PM EST

              So correct . All I can think about is the soldier who posted comment on his face-book page and that was the end of his service.By the way this is nothing new with the 3 and 4 stars the two stars are also big headed. Having served almost 25 years in the Army I came across a few of them

                #8.1 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 7:55 PM EST
                Reply

                why worry about ward? try to get back some of what obama has lavishly blown away,idiots!!!

                  Reply#9 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:58 PM EST

                  Why worry about Ward. Try to recover some of what Obama has lavishly blown away,Idiots!!!

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#10 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 4:03 PM EST

                  ...you clearly turn a blind eye to the comparatively inequitable comings and going of other generals, senate and house members and other government (state and local as well) who abuse their positions...of all and any party...don't put one on the firing line and allow those who set up the scheme to fire the bullets. Republicans waste just as much money as Democrats; no party has a hold on corruption. Assign blame where it belongs and don't a blanket or shot gun blast to any one party...current President didn't put in place the current War or the Billions wasted (blown away) in Iraq and Afghanistan.

                    #10.1 - Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:30 AM EST
                    Reply

                    $129,000 for an 11 days trip???

                    He's not the only one. Who pocketed all this money?

                    No body can spend that much money... $13,000 a day.

                    If someone else doesn't draw some fire I say give him back the Star and forget it happened.

                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#11 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 4:03 PM EST

                    There are people who will take a cheap shot at the President, no matter what the topic.

                    DNFTT

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#12 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 4:32 PM EST

                    I watched the Asian Media this morning, as Obama and Family departed Air Force One in Myanmar...

                    Saturday he will be in Thailand for a short visit and tour of the Thai Palace and many other places...

                    Obama will be reminded of the U-Tapao deal with NASA & Thailand. Thanks - but NO-THANKS...

                    This makes how many trips for him and the family the last 3.5+years???

                    At least this time they used only one airplane for themselves. Not like the EU trip where the wife had her own plane...

                    Next week the New Chinese Leader will be in Thailand, closing numerous business/trade deals, already made...

                    Remember the $3+billion USD loan Obama made to Brazil, so they could develop their off-shore oil reserves??? This enabled them to send oil to China. China had already reached a $10+billion deal with guaranteed oil deliveries for a decade...

                    BTY - I will be in BKK - If his motorcade comes by I will shot him a MOON & one finger salute...

                    • 1 vote
                    #12.1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:12 AM EST

                    AC Robertson, Like Nixon, Reagan, Bush I and Bush II never took vacation or went on any government trips?

                    During 2 terms as President, Bush spent all or of part of 477 days at Camp David, on retreats and made 77 trips to his Crawford Ranch, in Texas, where he spent all or part of 490 days, on his Ranch.
                    The total number of days of vacation or retreat President Bush took, while in office over a period of 8 years was 967 days, or 32% of his total time in office, was spent on vacations or retreats.

                      #12.2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:14 PM EST
                      Reply

                      If it were some lowly enlisted person they would be court marshaled and given a dishonorable discharge along with some brig time.

                      This schmuck gets to retire as a high paid 3 star and will most likely get a cushy big business job.

                      Typical of the military top level taking care of each other. Another bad mark against the US military.

                        Reply#13 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 6:58 PM EST

                        His demotion will mean nothing to his retirement...the military retirement caps out at a 1 star generals, so the 2,3,4 star generals all make the same in retirement...not a lot of pity from me...

                          Reply#14 - Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:11 PM EST
                          Reply

                          Sorry rules changed in 2008...

                            Reply#15 - Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:39 AM EST

                            Prove it.

                              Reply#16 - Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:33 AM EST

                              I googled Army Times, went to the archive and found the info, as opposed to an anti-military website. If that didn't work I looked at my husbands pay stub and figured the difference between an O6 and 07-09 retirement pay....he still gets no pity from me. The mark of a good officer is his or her moral standard...he doesn't have one....

                                #16.1 - Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:18 PM EST

                                This is how you would calculate retired pay for most service members that like him entered active duty before 8 Sep 1980:

                                If you first entered a uniformed service* before September 8, 1980:
                                Compute your retired pay based on length of service by multiplying the basic monthly pay for your retired grade at the time of retirement by the years of creditable active federal service at the rate of 2.5 percent for each whole year of service. This is called the "Final Pay" retirement system. That means you get 50% for 20 years of service up to a maximum of 100% for 40 years.**

                                Here is the law, last updated in 2006 according to the website: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/1407a?quicktabs_8=2#quicktabs-8

                                10 USC § 1407a - Retired pay base: officers retired in general or flag officer grades
                                (a) Rates of Basic Pay to Be Used in Determination.— In a case in which the determination under section 1406 or 1407 of this title of the retired pay base applicable to the computation of the retired pay of a covered general or flag officer involves a rate of basic pay payable to that officer for any period that was subject to a reduction under section 203 (a)(2) of title 37 for such period, such retired-pay-base determination shall be made using the rate of basic pay for such period provided by law, rather than such rate as so reduced.
                                (b) Covered General and Flag Officers.— In this section, the term "covered general or flag officer" means a member or former member who after September 30, 2006, is retired in a general officer grade or flag officer grade.

                                Take note that it references title 37 which says:

                                37 USC § 203 - Rates
                                (a)
                                (1) The rates of monthly basic pay for members of the uniformed services within each pay grade are those prescribed in accordance with section 1009 of this title or as otherwise prescribed by law.
                                (2) Notwithstanding the rates of basic pay in effect at any time as provided by law, the rates of basic pay payable for commissioned officers in pay grades O–7 through O–10 may not exceed the monthly equivalent of the rate of pay for level II of the Executive Schedule, and the rates of basic pay payable for all other officers and for enlisted members may not exceed the monthly equivalent of the rate of pay for level V of the Executive Schedule.

                                You see the part about not exceeding Level 2 of the Executive schedule? It has been around forever and I doubt if it has changed since 2006. That means his retired pay is capped at $179,700 even though when you calculate what it should be, based on him falling under the Final Pay retirements system, a monthly base salary (Over 38) times his years of service (39) times 2.5%, is $198,619.20.

                                http://www.opm.gov/oca/12tables/pdf/ex.pdf

                                He is going to get the same amount of money that he would have if he retired as an O-10.

                                  #16.2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:57 PM EST
                                  Reply

                                  He should have just charged it to haliburton, they have carte blanche to rape and kill on behalf of the American tax slave, and the ability to send palettes of cash to nowhere. Why did he bring his wife along, he should have rented a pro.

                                    Reply#17 - Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:44 AM EST

                                    This is what happens when you are constantly being told "Yes" by everyone under you. Eventually you believe that the rules no longer apply to you and that you can do anything you want.

                                    I wonder how many Soldiers this guy took rank from for TDY fraud over his career. He should send them all a personal apology. Oh how the mighty are falling.....

                                      Reply#18 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:04 PM EST
                                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.