E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSSA former high school valedictorian is on trial for murder in the beating and stabbing death of his mother in their suburban Michigan home.
Jury selection commenced Tuesday in 22-year-old Jeffrey Pyne's trial, the Detroit Free Press reported. Oakland County Circuit Judge Leo Bowman began weeding out prospective jurors who might have a bias in the case out of a pool of 200, according to the newspaper.
Pyne is charged with the first-degree murder in the death of his 51-year-old mother, Ruth Pyne, and prosecutors are expected to argue he was angry with his mom and killed her, the Detroit Free Press reported. There's no physical evidence linking Jeffrey Pyne with the murder, the defense has argued, according to the newspaper.
Judge Bowman's staff attorney Vicki King told NBC News Wednesday that once jury selection is concluded, opening statements are expected to begin Friday.
Watch US News crime videos on NBCNews.com
Ruth Pyne, who reportedly had a history of mental illness, was found dead inside the the garage of the family's Highland Township, Mich., home in May 2011, the Detroit Free Press reported.
Jeffrey Pyne was indicted in October 2011 and remains in jail without bond, according to the Detroit Free Press. His family maintains that he is innocent, The Detroit News reported.
An autopsy of Ruth Pyne's body indicated she was struck repeatedly in the head with an object and was stabbed 16 times in the neck, according to the News.
More content from NBCNews.com:
- In 911 calls, Kelley tries to invoke diplomatic immunity
- Etan Patz suspect indicted on murder, kidnapping charges, sources say
- 'I got the wrong Courtney': Man picks up incorrect girl from school
- Storm system could snarl East Coast holiday travel
- Displaced by Sandy, elderly sisters find time to laugh
- Video: Thousands sign petition for Texas to secede
Leave a Comment:
You don't normally end up in jail without bond if there isn't any physical evidence.
Who's reporting this incomplete garbage?
Warren...that shows evidence she was struck. What links the son to her death? I don't know anything about this story, except what I've read here, and the article makes me think he shouldn't be behind bars awaiting trial.
Murdered because he was angry and brought up on charges without any evidence. This makes no sense at all, are all the prosecutors just grabbing at cases to help with re-election or in hopes their record of the amount of cases they tried is impressive enough to get them a seat on the bench. If this young man is found innocent I hope he sues the Oakland County, the judge and the officer that escorted him to his cell.
There's no physical evidence linking him to the murder (of his mom) and he's being held without bond? How can that even happen?
This thing we call the legal system really confuses me.
What confuses me is why anyone would think that a former valedictorian could not have committed this (or any other) crime. Who better to commit a cold and calculated first-degree murder than a rocket scientist? Unabomber anyone?
agree "eric"....what is the significance of him being "valedictorian"....