Cops: Driver with child in car rams gate, ends up on active runway at Phoenix airport

A woman driving with a small child in her car crashed through a gate at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport and drove onto a runway, Phoenix police said Friday. 

The woman rammed the airport gate around 10 p.m. Thursday and drove onto the runway, police spokesman Sgt. Trent Crump said. Phoenix police with the Sky Harbor Airport chased down the driver after a few minutes and forced her vehicle to halt, authorities said in a media release sent to NBC News.

More on this story on NBC affiliate KPNX 12 News

The incident was the latest involving vehicles crashing through the airport's gates or fences and getting onto its runways. Sky Harbor spent $10 million to upgrade its perimeter security and access gates after a man being chased by police in 2005 crashed a stolen pickup through a gate and drove onto the runways, passing several jets on a taxiway. In 2003, two teens in a stolen car crashed through a perimeter fence and drove onto the airfield. Both incidents caused brief closure of aircraft operations. 


The driver and the child were not injured, Crump said.  The driver was "exhibiting signs of impairment" when she was arrested, the release said.

Watch the most-viewed videos on NBCNews.com

Police said they were not aware of any flights being endangered, but airport operations were stopped for about 15 minutes because of it. 

Sky Harbor's communication department declined to release any details, saying only that all operations returned to normal shortly after a "security incident." 

Police also declined to release any more information until later Friday.

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Discuss this post

Note to journalists: You don't win a Pulitzer by stating in the last sentence of your article that nobody was hurt in a crash that is not mentioned anywhere else in the article.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:03 AM EST

Note to Bill : I think they were referring to the airport gate she plowed through with the vehicle.

  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:28 AM EST

"...chased down the driver and forced her vehicle to halt..."

It might have ended quicker had they all stayed in their vehicles.

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:58 AM EST

I assume that was being sarcastic. :) I'm sure they meant to say chased her while in their cars.

    #1.3 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:59 AM EST

    Meanwhile in the airport terminal, TSA agents successfully wrestled a 86 year old woman to the ground and confiscated her full sized tube of toothpaste averting a possible disaster.

    Authorities are investigating whether the two incidents are related.

      #1.4 - Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:50 PM EST

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tz3dfrdh4U&feature=related

      Officer was i driving too fast? No , mam you were flying to low.

        #1.5 - Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:51 PM EST
        Reply

        I hope they checked her citizenship.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:40 AM EST

        Robert: "I hope they checked her citizenship."

        Why?

        • 4 votes
        #2.1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:26 AM EST

        Yeah, why??

          #2.2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:00 AM EST

          why not?

            #2.3 - Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:45 PM EST
            Reply

            Impaired? Duh!

            • 1 vote
            Reply#3 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:01 AM EST

            DUI plus child endangerment plus she will have to deal with the Feds in addition to the local gendarmes.

            Not her best day...fer sure

            • 5 votes
            Reply#4 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:32 AM EST

            gendarmes ?

              #4.1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:47 AM EST

              The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary describes a gendarme as "a soldier who is employed on police duties"

              Google is your friend.

              • 4 votes
              #4.2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:17 AM EST

              We're AMERICANS, for heaven's sake. We don't read, we don't research and we don't "get" sarcasm. Geez... what's next, ya want us for ta not text and drive?

              • 1 vote
              #4.3 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:40 PM EST

              Google is more like my Big Brother.

                #4.4 - Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:51 AM EST
                Reply

                She was late for her flight and did not want to be delayed by TSA.

                • 7 votes
                Reply#5 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:38 AM EST

                This woman should be prosecuted for child abuse, in addition to all the other state and federal charges, and her child placed in foster care, before she kills the child. I'm sure her lawyer will claim she had diabetes, or suffered an adverse reaction to some medicine, or some other such nonsense, but if she shows evidence of any alcohol or drugs in her blood, then she needs some serious jail time, and not just a license suspension.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#6 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:39 AM EST

                Maybe it is not nonsense. Medical conditions do occur while folks are driving. Wow to open your mouth in such a manner "diabetes or some such nonsense." Wow.

                • 8 votes
                #6.1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:01 AM EST

                Your comment contradicts your username. Perhaps you are aiming for ironic humor.
                Miryn has made a very good point. How is diabetes or any other medical condition or emergency "nonsense" if it is the truth? Perhaps she needed medical help and this was the first occurrence of a symptom.

                This story is void of many details. So the first thing you do is jump to conclusions to show the internet how much of an dolt you are. Congratulations.
                "Mission Accomplished."

                • 3 votes
                #6.2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:12 PM EST

                True story here, a man drove clean through the telephone pole in front of my sister's house then his car ended up on their front porch, the good news is that it was loud enough to sound like a bomb exploding and paramedics arrived quick enough to save his life because he was having a heart attack. But with this new information I'm learning from Hismomraisedadamnfool I feel betrayed by the system, I didn't know being in a car makes you immune to all medical complications, I will have to petition the PD in my town to re-investigate the car crash and take his kids away to foster care if he has any.

                • 2 votes
                #6.3 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 5:39 PM EST

                Perhaps you are missing my point. As a fine example of lawyers claiming various "medical conditions", research the Diane Schuler Taconic Parkway wrong-way driving case in 2009, where the lawyers tried claiming she had diabetes, when in fact she had had gestational diabetes, which is a temporary complication of pregnancy. They claimed she had a tooth abscess, which caused her to self-medicate for the pain. They claimed she had a "lump in her leg which could have been the cause of an embolism. None of these alleged conditions were effective in refuting the fact that her BAC was 0.19, and there was THC in her blood, as well, indicating marijuana use. This was the official toxicology report that proved her intoxication was the cause of this accident, which killed seven other innocent people. This is the kind of nonsense I am referring to, and the kind of tactic the airport gate crasher's lawyers might try to use to excuse her actions, and as I said, if the BAC and/or drugs in the blood show she was actually legally intoxicated or impaired, then they should throw the book at her. I fully understand that people with diabetes can black out behind the wheel, or exhibit behavior that looks very much like intoxication, and most of the time, it can be reversed fairly quickly. If they are drunk at the same time, the drunkenness will be the deciding factor.

                However, if one has a medical history of such a condition and is aware of the likelihood that it can happen at any time, it is no different than allowing an epileptic prone to seizures to get behind the wheel. There is a danger to the public in doing so, and the laws prohibit this in most cases. As another case in point, there was a driver in NJ back in the fifties, who had Meniere's disease, and had unpredictable attacks of vertigo, one of which caused him to lose control of his car, cross the center line, and kill the occupant of another car in the opposite lane. He was prosecuted for manslaughter, and his conviction was upheld on appeal. The basis for the conviction was that he committed an act of willful reckless endangerment by getting behind the wheel of his car, while knowing full well that he might suffer an attack while driving.

                Driving a car while taking medicine that might impair one's ability to drive, and getting into an accident, will likely result in a charge of DUI or DWI, and there have been many cases that have resulted in convictions. Just because a drug is legally prescribed does not remove the user's responsibility for its potential consequences. Look at any prescription label, and if it says "May impair ability to drive or operate heavy machinery", and you get into an accident that injures another party, this fact will likely be discovered, and will result in serious consequences for driving while impaired. People on long-term narcotic drugs for pain, despite being prescribed by a physician, face the same consequences.

                • 3 votes
                #6.4 - Sat Nov 17, 2012 9:17 AM EST
                Reply

                So much for "hardened resources" at the airports of the nation when an impaired woman can get out onto the airfield so easily. Think what someone with nefarious intent could do....

                • 5 votes
                Reply#7 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:45 AM EST

                I was thinking the same thing. Imagine and "impaired" woman with 1,000 pounds of C4 instead of a child.

                • 4 votes
                #7.1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:21 AM EST

                They're typically just chain-linked fences. Not concrete walls. Many gates don't have any personnel security, just a keypad that opens the gate.

                • 2 votes
                #7.2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:38 AM EST

                Shut up! you gonna give em ideas.

                • 1 vote
                #7.3 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:19 PM EST
                Reply

                You can FLY!

                Just make the minivan go 88 MPH and flip on the flux capacitor switch.

                No really, you can FLY!

                • 6 votes
                Reply#8 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:09 AM EST

                Tragic, but funny flylowguy.

                I just watched "Days of Wine and Roses" this morning. People should be required to watch this movie every year they update their license.

                • 2 votes
                #8.1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:29 AM EST

                no one drove in that movie

                • 1 vote
                #8.2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:49 AM EST

                True story. A friend on mine drove a bus on late night shift at KCI(Kansas City International), and called the tower to get clearance for takeoff. The tower knew Dave and gave him clearance and he took his (empty) bus onto the takeoff strip and zoomed to about 80 mph. I think he claimed mechanical failure and "aborted" takeoff. This was in the early eighties and the night was dead as a doornail. I'm sure they got a good laugh. PS; Yeah, we were all college age.

                • 3 votes
                #8.3 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:03 PM EST

                Robert, was dave the employee bus driver? If so I believe I know him, and yes he was just off the wall enough to do it for those who doubt the story.

                • 1 vote
                #8.4 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:42 PM EST

                Yeah, Dave was driving. I'll ask, do you know the profession he went into after? That's the FUNNY part.

                • 1 vote
                #8.5 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:55 PM EST

                Well, I want to know now. You said too much and not enough.

                  #8.6 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:21 PM EST

                  @save......law enforcement!!!!! LOL

                    #8.7 - Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:11 AM EST
                    Reply

                    As usual, little information or context, just disassociated words. That's it, keep us stupid.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#9 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:19 AM EST

                    Sad day for "journalism" when the comments on the story are better than the story.

                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#10 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:21 AM EST

                    If she is illegal she will probably sue the state and win, because the signs weren't in spanish.

                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#11 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:08 AM EST

                    I've traveled much of this country & any half way important sign is also in spanish. This is a bi-lingual country. I am white, born in FL and have no issue with spanish speaking people. What's the big deal? I have no doubt that most signs in AR, as in FL & most other states are bi-lingual.

                      #11.1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:07 AM EST

                      Lotta signs in Europe and Asia have english on them also. Just look at it as they will spend their money if they know what they are buying, and can drive to it.

                        #11.2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:09 PM EST

                        yeah pixie, they're in English and Hillbilly, with holes in them.

                        • 2 votes
                        #11.3 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 8:26 PM EST

                        Assuming you can read, paramed, start working on your Spanish to make you smarter.

                          #11.4 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:53 PM EST

                          denouement- the vast majority of your posts consist of name calling. Feel better now honey?

                            #11.5 - Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:26 PM EST
                            Reply

                            Well at least she didn't drive her kid into a body of water to drown.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#12 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:23 AM EST

                            Another warped GOP/Tea Baggers so discussed the Democrats won the election. Arizona, they're in their own raciest world so nothing surprises me from that country.

                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#13 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:30 AM EST

                            English or intelligence are not your strong suits are they dmill? You lose all credibility when you miss out on simple syntax and spelling while making an absolute assinine political rant from something that is completely non-political. Bravo, for you shall truely deserve the title of "idiot of the day".

                            • 6 votes
                            #13.1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:48 PM EST

                            I agree, dmill wins the idiot of the day award.

                            • 4 votes
                            #13.2 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 6:30 PM EST

                            Tracy, you kind of lose credibility yourself when you misspell asinine and truly.

                            • 1 vote
                            #13.3 - Sat Nov 17, 2012 3:05 PM EST
                            Reply

                            She was DRUNK No other explanations necessary.

                            • 2 votes
                            Reply#14 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:50 AM EST

                            Sure, she could have beem impaired by alcohol. . .that, or she could have experienced a mild stroke or even a migraine which could have impaired her ability to discern where she was, how fast she was going, her speech, her sight. Shall I go on?

                            • 2 votes
                            #14.1 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:34 AM EST
                            Reply

                            .

                              Reply#15 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 12:21 PM EST

                              She is lucky she didn't get shot or something. I mean if I saw a vehicle bust through the fence/gate onto the runway I would automatically reach for my gun. If she doesn't stop immediately I would have at the very least shot out her tires, then her if she still kept going. Maybe they saw that a child was in the car right off; that could have been her only savior.

                                Reply#16 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:46 PM EST

                                Gates are there for a reason - access to the facility, by vehicular or pedestrian traffic. As stated above, both in the article and in the comments, she was impaired somehow.

                                I don't think it was a medical condition so much as either alcohol or drugs. Then again, I wasn't there, and am not privy to the situation at hand. Let the law enforcement personnel handle it, along with the appropriate medical personnel.

                                But, and I agree with other posts, something does need to be done to reinforce these gates. This has happened too many times, all around the country, this past couple of years. Communities are being too cost conscious at a time when it can't really be afforded, especially in such a "major concern" area as an active airport.

                                  Reply#17 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:04 PM EST

                                  Cement barriers; electric fence; mote!

                                    Reply#18 - Fri Nov 16, 2012 4:13 PM EST

                                    I do not understand why something stronger like those hydraulic poles that come out of the ground are not installed?? I would think this would certainly stop a vehicle from making it through the airport gate entrances. Fencing is obviously not strong enough to prevent incidents like this from happening so jersey barriers should be used around the perimeter as well.

                                      Reply#19 - Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:02 AM EST

                                      $10 millions in the pockets of bureaucrats.

                                        Reply#20 - Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:01 PM EST

                                        I thought you only saw this stuff on action movies.

                                          Reply#21 - Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:57 PM EST

                                          Hey if you really got to get on a plane... why not? Well, too bad security is overblown these days. Back in the day she probably could have gotten a free flight.

                                            Reply#22 - Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:04 PM EST

                                            All they need is an X-Ray Scanner on the tarmac. Crash through the gate with car, stop, proceed through runway, get out of car then have your items scanned by X-Ray. No need for TSA or big bad Security guards with A-K47's... well maybe a few for the REAL Terrorists if there are any.

                                              Reply#23 - Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:11 PM EST
                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.