Levees protect New Orleans, but annual bill is crushing

Gerald Herbert / AP

This flood wall and floodgate are along Lakeshore Drive and Lake Pontchartrain in New Orleans, La.

In the busy and under-staffed offices of New Orleans' flood-control leaders, there's an uneasy feeling about what lies ahead.

By the time the next hurricane season starts in June of 2013, the city will take control of much of a revamped protection system of gates, walls and armored levees that the Army Corps of Engineers has spent about $12 billion building. The corps has about $1 billion worth of work left. 

Engineers consider it a Rolls Royce of flood protection — comparable to systems in seaside European cities such as St. Petersburg, Venice, Rotterdam and Amsterdam. Whether the infrastructure can hold is less in question than whether New Orleans can be trusted with the keys. 

The Army Corps estimates it will take $38 million a year to pay for upkeep, maintenance and operational costs after it's turned over to local officials. 


Local flood-control chief Robert Turner said he has questions about where that money will come from. At current funding levels, the region will run out of money to properly operate the high-powered system within a decade unless a new revenue source is found. 

"There's a price to pay for resiliency," the levee engineer said from his office at the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority-East. "We can't let pieces of this system die away. We can't be parochial about it." 

On Nov. 6, New Orleans voters were faced with one of their first challenges on flood protection when they voted on renewal of a critical levee tax. The tax levy was approved, meaning millions of dollars should be available annually for levee maintenance. 

Bob Bea, a civil engineer at the University of California, said the region must find additional money to keep the system working properly. "If you try to operate it and maintain it on a shoestring, then it won't provide the protection that people deserve." 

How New Orleans has changed since Hurricane Katrina in 2005, with Douglas Brinkley, Rice University Professor.

Many locals remain uneasy, even though Turner's agency is a welcome replacement for local levee boards that were previously derided. 

"It's scary," said C. Ray Bergeron, owner of Fleur De Lis Car Care, a service station in the Lakeview neighborhood where water rose to rooftops after levees collapsed during Hurricane Katrina in August 2005. Before Katrina, Bergeron said the local levee boards were complacent. "They told everybody everything was fine, 'Oh yeah, it's fine. Let's go have martinis and lunch.'" 

After Katrina, the locally run levee boards that oversaw the area's defenses were vilified, and quickly replaced by the regional levee district run by Turner. 

Congressional investigations found the old Orleans Levee Board more interested in managing a casino license and two marinas than looking after levees. Inspections were ceremonial, millions of dollars were spent on a fountain and overpasses rather than on levee protection. And there was confusion over who was responsible for managing the fragmented levee system, U.S. Senate investigations revealed. 

Still, experts generally agree the old levee board's failings did not cause the levees to collapse during Katrina. Poor levee designs by the corps and the sheer strength of Katrina get the lion's share of the blame. 

Since the Flood Control Act of 1936, the Army Corps has given local or state authorities oversight of water-control projects, whether earthen levees in the Midwest or beach walls in New England. 

Bill Haber / AP

Water is pumped through giant tubes around the floodgate at the London Ave. outflow canal during a test in New Orleans in May 2009.

"That's been the eternal problem with flood-protection systems," said Thomas Wolff, an engineer at Michigan State University. "You build something very good and then give it to local interests who are not as well-funded." 

New Orleans is an unusual case because the area is inheriting the nation's first-of-its-kind urban flood control system. 

"We've given a very expensive system to a place that may not be able to afford it over the long term," said Leonard Shabman, an Arlington, Va.-based water resources expert. Letting the Army Corps run it isn't much of a solution either, he added. "It's not like the corps' budget is flush." 

The nation has spent lavishly on fixing the system in the seven years since Katrina flooded 80 percent of New Orleans and left 1,800 people dead. 

"It is better than what the Dutch have for the types of storms we have," said Carlton Dufrechou, a member of the board of the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Foundation, which monitors local environmental issues. 

Ensuring it remains that way could be tricky. The biggest headaches are several mega-projects with lots of moving parts, all needing constant upkeep. The corps is building them across major waterways that lead into New Orleans. 

Take for instance the 1.8-mile-long, 26-foot-high surge barrier southeast of the French Quarter that blocks water coming up from the Gulf of Mexico across lakes and into the city's canals. Water from this direction doomed the Lower 9th Ward and threatened to flood the French Quarter. Maintaining this giant wall alone will cost $4 million or more a year. 

"You have to get out there and do exercises, do the preventive maintenance, change out equipment over time on a particular schedule," Turner said, enumerating the challenges. "There are a lot of cases where a single thing goes wrong and that can create a failure, a complete failure where you can't close the system." 

There is a mounting list of to-dos. 

Already, lightning has knocked out chunks of wall. Grass hasn't grown well on several new stretches of levee. Louisiana State University grass experts have been called in to help seed them. 

There are recurring problems with vibrations and shuddering on a new floodgate at Bayou Dupre in St. Bernard Parish. The corps has plans to overhaul the structure in the spring before handing it over to local control. And there will be the inevitable sinking of levees and structures, as always happens in south Louisiana's naturally soft soils. Over time, levees will have to be raised. 

Col. Ed Fleming, the New Orleans corps commander, said his outfit will work to ensure the transition to local control is smooth. 

"This happens with corps civil projects all over the country. That's the way it works in Iraq, Afghanistan," he said. "We have authority to build, but we have no authority to do operations and maintenance." 

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

 

Discuss this post

"You have to get out there and do exercises, do the preventive maintenance, change out equipment over time on a particular schedule,"

The "big easy"?....your jokeing right?........

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:49 AM EST

I lived in NO for 20 years, loved it...Hurricane Katrina came along and we had to l eave..moved back to Spokane, Wa... The "Big Easy stuff started years and years ago... Pay enuf money and it's "easy" to rake it in...

    #1.1 - Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:25 PM EST
    Reply

    Many locals remain uneasy, even though Turner's agency is a welcome replacement for local levee boards that were previously derided.

    why are you "uneasy"? you have a welcome replacement. they are after all from the government and there to help you. But just to be on the safe side get your dome reservations early.

    • 5 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:55 AM EST

    Or look for real estate that isn't below sea level.

    • 6 votes
    #2.1 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:04 AM EST

    Morning gents,

    Folks down there who have a plan save back their income tax return every year or something similar for evacuation money, no evacuation, they go on vacation. The rest just stand there with their hand reaching out to take whatever is free.

    I can tell you exactly what will happen to these walls and levees over time. The money that is supposed to go to them will be channeled elsewhere and they will be in the same condition that the city let them get in to prior to Katrina. Of course they will blame it on everyone else again.

      #2.2 - Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:51 AM EST
      Reply

      Or they could realize they live below sea level and move elsewhere.

      • 7 votes
      Reply#3 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:12 AM EST

      Nah, it makes much more sense that the rest of us help pay for a silly choice.

      • 5 votes
      #3.1 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:36 AM EST

      to the magical safe kingdom of where exactly? ...would they get a free unicorn upon arrival?

        #3.2 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:51 AM EST

        perhaps they should "run away" to someplace safe, like i dunno maybe NYC...i hear they have 5.000 jobs there. ....

          #3.3 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:59 AM EST

          I personally couldn't care less that they live below sea level, just don't go crying to the fed. gov. every time water gets in your boots, except the fact that you're living there by your own choice and free will and therefore should fix your own problems, the rest of the country shouldn't be paying for the continued, and on purpose, decisions of another.

          • 3 votes
          #3.4 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:21 AM EST

          and I would also include federally funded flood insurance where we pay time after time for people to rebuild on the flood plain of rivers. When people mention NYC, remember they do have the tax base to pay for their protection. Storms will continue to be extreme and everybody had better consider to move inland a bit.

            #3.5 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:17 PM EST
            Reply

            New Orleans being at the mouth of the Mississippi River, the largest and most essential gateway for a vast majority of the Country, is necessary. We just have and will continue to spend billions-trillions on NY, that only exists to serve the 2% on Wall Street. Hypocrites!

            • 2 votes
            Reply#4 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:19 AM EST

            New Orleans hasn't been necessary since sometime after the Civil War. You really need to get out of your trailer more often.

              #4.1 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:19 PM EST
              Reply

              The land under New Orleans is naturally sinking. Seasonal floods of the Mississippi used to deposit silt which built the land back up. But man decided to try to control this natural flooding. So now the land isn't built back up each year.

              New Orleans and Venice. Two naturally sinking cities. Two monuments to man's stupidity. Trying to live where it doesn't make sense.

              • 5 votes
              Reply#5 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:19 AM EST

              economykiller have you ever read a book, there were historical reasons for both Venice and New Orleans. The Mississippi was the gateway into the US at the time and the people went to Venice because of the Mongol hordes because the islands where Venice is now was defenseable. They are not sinking as much as the oceans are raising, due to global warming but I am sure trailer trash like you don't believe in global warming. You just keep your head shoved up your a$$ and everything will be OK

                #5.1 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:23 PM EST
                Reply

                I've visited New Orleans before and after Katrina and in my opinion most of the homes (and residents) of the lower wards are not worth protecting, certainly not to the tune of 12 billion $.

                • 2 votes
                Reply#6 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:42 AM EST

                Rebuilding the community below sea level was a waste of money...but then, that is what the government does best. Lets see what happens once the city has the keys to the dike.

                • 1 vote
                #6.1 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:30 AM EST
                Reply

                oh boy looting season is just around the corner, makes "black friday" look tame, and no credit card debt to worry about not paying.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#7 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:55 AM EST

                if you want to live in a fish bowl you can't expect rational people to keep bailing you out...let it go back to nature...

                • 2 votes
                Reply#8 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:10 AM EST

                This is only one part of our decaying infrastructure.

                  Reply#9 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:17 AM EST

                  Let them keep it if they want, but let New Orleans pay for it. I don't want to pay for it, or the upkeep of the Hoover Dam, or any other local project benefiting that community (esp if the project was a political reaction to a natural disaster). If we are asked to collectively pay for the levy system, I've got plenty of ideas for my city's improvement that the people in Washington State can pay for and maintain.

                    Reply#10 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:25 AM EST

                    We are subsidizing people to live in a city below sea level in an area prone to hurricanes. People react rationally to incentives and disincentives. Why are we encouraging people to live in harms way? When the next hurricane hits New Orleans, will rebuild again? This makes no sense.

                    • 2 votes
                    Reply#11 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:27 AM EST

                    What about those who live in Tornado Alley, or the west coast near fault lines, or anywhere along rivers that flood, or anywhere along the gulf coast thru Texas or any high fire areas, or ....... Say, where do you live? Maybe all the millions of displanced folks can move there. But then you'd say that not enough jobs are there so they should stay away so as not to turn your neighoods into a crowded slum.

                      #11.1 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:51 PM EST
                      Reply

                      Another point to consider.... Why would N.0. or the State maintain the levy system at their own expense. If / when it fails, they can count on the Federal government to repair and rebuild better than it was before. There is a significant moral hazard here.

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#12 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:33 AM EST

                      Since it is a "chocolate city" once again.. why do the liberals care about costs?

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#13 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:43 AM EST

                      I thought San Francisco was the chocolate city. Ghiradelli chocolate company on the wharf and all.

                      Why is caring for our infrastructure a partisan matter?

                      • 1 vote
                      #13.1 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:50 AM EST

                      Gee LJ, I thought Louisiana was a red state. Through the years, it has been the red states, which collected the majority of the emergency aid from the US government.

                        #13.2 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:32 PM EST

                        You make a good point.

                        I support caring for our infrastructure in all states.

                          #13.3 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:48 PM EST
                          Reply

                          Well, I guess if "We the People" can afford to pick up the eleven year multi-billion dollar tab (maybe headed to trillions) for New York's 9/11 attack, that's right...it's been eleven years since 9/11 attacks and the building still isn't finished, we can afford to pick up the tab for New Orleans too. "We the People" are going to be picking up the tab for a lot of things for sometime to come. Unfunded Public Employee pensions, State and local governments going bankrupt, bailing out banks too large to fail, Iraq and Afghanistan and the hundreds of thousands of wounded veterans. Of course "We the People" will pick up the tab for hurricane "Sandy" (New York and New Jersey should be up and running in twenty years or so). "We the People" are going to be working very hard for a very long time to pay this off, think of it as Nation Building on the lay away plan.

                            Reply#14 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:50 AM EST

                            Did the U.S. government do a god job of nation building in Iraq? No. Is it doing a good job of nation building in Afghanistan? Hell, no. Why should anyone think it will do a good job of "nation building" in New York and New Jersey? Stand by for another huge waste of taxpayers' money.

                              #14.1 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:41 PM EST
                              Reply

                              $12 billion to build this system equals $35,000,000/New Orleans citizen and $38M/year to maintain it amounts to $100,000/year for each of these same folks. Perhaps it'ss time to begin thinking about relocating this city because in the long run it might be less expensive.

                                Reply#15 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:04 PM EST

                                It's just nature trying to flush the toilet. That city is full of scumbags anyway if they were all swept out to sea that would be a good thing

                                  Reply#16 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:52 PM EST

                                  I agree on that one. Been there. From the cops to the teen age boy prostitutes standing on the lower end of Bourbon Street (next to the cops) it is one corrupt and decadent place, that the media calls "charm". Flush it!

                                    #16.1 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:09 PM EST

                                    There's a lot more to N.O. than just the Quarter. Every city has it's dark side.

                                    I go to N.O. all the time and enjoy it very much.

                                      #16.2 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:50 PM EST

                                      I've lived in Boise, ID for four years, and I'm fairly certain we don't have a dark side if you don't count hipsters haha

                                        #16.3 - Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:24 PM EST
                                        Reply

                                        don't these people know that you cannot stop mother nature and the fact that the oceans will serge and the wind will blow the earth will shift and now lazy worthless people will stand in the way and then blame the rest of us i say if thy are to stupid to move or even get out of the way then f#@$ them let god or the devil have them becuase we do not need stupid nor can we afford it any more

                                          Reply#17 - Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:03 AM EST
                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.