WikiLeaks case: Manning grilled over why he didn't complain earlier about treatment in detention

Patrick Semansky / AP

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning steps out of a security vehicle as he is escorted into a courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., on Thursday.

FORT MEADE, Md. -- Pfc. Bradley Manning spent six more hours on the stand Friday during a hearing on the WikiLeaks case, facing questions from the prosecution, the judge and his own attorney, David Coombs.

The discussion never deviated from Manning's treatment while at Quantico brig, focusing mainly on why he didn't complain about his treatment before January and on various incidents that may have led to the military to put Manning on prevention of injury status, which put more restrictions on him.

Manning did seem to choke back tears at one point when he spoke about his family.

When asked why he never complained about his restrictive status to his family during visits, Manning's voice hitched and his face got red. "I didn't want them to worry about me," he said. He added that he worried that he would not be allowed to have visitors if he complained.


One of the Marine guards who was assigned to Manning testified Friday evening about how Manning behaved at Quantico, saying that he was not a disrespectful inmate, with the exception of an incident in January 2011.

The guard testified that Manning yelled at the brig commander, which led the guards to call a "code blue" and mobilize a response team to possibly remove Manning forcibly from his cell. In the end, Manning wasn't removed from his cell, but the guard explained just how significant this incident was in the facility.

Assange asks Obama to release leak suspect

"It was an extremely big deal to show disrespect to the commanding officer of the brig," the former guard said.

Judge Denise Lind asked whether it was standard for someone who is disrespectful to the commander to be placed on suicide watch as a result.

Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

"It never happened before," the former guard said.

Earlier, a prosecutor, U.S. Army Maj. Ashden Fein, read through dozens of weekly evaluations in which Manning said that treatment by his guards was "excellent" and the facility "very professional." Fein also walked through months of assessments in which Manning did not ask to be taken off of protective status (which is essentially one step less restrictive than suicide watch).

Despite arriving at Quantico in late July 2010, Manning did not ask to be taken off prevention of injury status until January 2011, the defense said, when he appeared before a board to plead his case for fewer restrictions.

The defense argued that Manning demonstrated that he might harm himself on several occasions - including once making a noose.

Among the exhibits presented in court Friday were two bedsheets. Manning said that he recognized one of the sheets and, when asked whether it was the sheet he had made a noose out of while in detention in Kuwait, Manning said, "yes, sir."

Watch US News videos on NBCNews.com

The prosecution asked about Manning's handwritten statement on an admission form at the Quantico brig, in which he responded to a question about any suicidal tendencies with a cryptic "Always planning, never acting."

Manning said that when he appeared before the board in January 2011, the focus was on those two incidents. When the board asked about his admission statement, Manning told the court Friday that he had responded that it was really more of a philosophical question, so he gave them a longer, more intellectual answer.

Bradley Manning's psychiatrist says his recommendations ignored by Quantico staff

Manning said he argued with the board about what is really true or false, and explained that humans are fallible. He said it may have been a "sarcastic answer, given on a whim."

Manning did elicit laughter from some people in the courtroom when Fein asked him if he needed a "comfort break." Manning responded that he could wait. "Seven more minutes will be good," he said, adding, "I can control my bladder." The prosecutor said he would try to limit his next few questions to exactly seven minutes.

More content from NBCNews.com:

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

 

 

Discuss this post

F@#$CK that traitorous piece of dung!

  • 9 votes
Reply#1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 12:01 AM EST
Comment author avatartitfourtatExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Death by firing squad.

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 2:25 AM EST

"Traitor"? This kid sacrificed his career to inform his fellow Americans of impropriety in the military..... and his freedom. This is what one would expect from a real patriot, not a traitor.

  • 11 votes
#1.2 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 5:56 AM EST

ARRESTED OVER POSTS

POLICE STATE HAS ARRIVED PROTECT YOURSELVES BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY

RICHMOND, Va. — A former Marine involuntarily detained for psychiatric evaluation for posting strident anti-government messages on Facebook has received an outpouring of support from people who say authorities are trampling on his First Amendment rights.

Brandon J. Raub, 26, has been in custody since FBI, Secret Service agents and police in Virginia's Chesterfield County questioned him Thursday evening about what they said were ominous posts talking about a coming revolution. In one message earlier this month according to authorities, Raub wrote: "Sharpen my axe; I'm here to sever heads."

Police – acting under a state law that allows emergency, temporary psychiatric commitments upon the recommendation of a mental health professional – took Raub to the John Randolph Medical Center in Hopewell. He was not charged with any crime.

A Virginia-based civil liberties group, The Rutherford Institute, dispatched one of its attorneys to the hospital to represent Raub at a hearing Monday. A judge ordered Raub detained for another month, Rutherford executive director John Whitehead said.

"For government officials to not only arrest Brandon Raub for doing nothing more than exercising his First Amendment rights but to actually force him to undergo psychological evaluations and detain him against his will goes against every constitutional principle this country was founded upon," Whitehead said.

Raub's mother, Cathleen Thomas, said by telephone that the government had overstepped its bounds.

"The bottom line is his freedom of speech has been violated," she said.

Thomas said her son, who served tours as a combat engineer in Iraq and Afghanistan, is "concerned about all the wars we've experienced" and believes the U.S. government was complicit in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. One of his Facebook posts, she said, pictured the gaping hole in the Pentagon and asked "where's the plane?"

Whitehead said he found nothing alarming in Raub's social media commentaries. "The posts I read that supposedly were of concern were libertarian-type posts I see all the time," he said.

The big concern, Whitehead said, is whether government officials are monitoring citizens' private Facebook pages and detaining people with whom they disagree.

Dee Rybiski, an FBI spokeswoman in Richmond, said there was no Facebook snooping by her agency.

"We received quite a few complaints about what were perceived as threatening posts," she said. "Given the circumstances with the things that have gone on in the country with some of these mass shootings, it would be horrible for law enforcement not to pay attention to complaints."

Whitehead said some of the posts in question were made on a closed Facebook page that Raub had recently created so he questioned whether anyone from the public would have complained about them.

"Support Brandon Raub" Facebook pages have drawn significant interest, and other Internet sites had numerous comments from people outraged by the veteran's detention.

Raub's supporters characterized the detention as an arrest, complaining he was handcuffed and whisked away in a police cruiser without being served a warrant or read his rights. But authorities say it wasn't an arrest because Raub doesn't face criminal charges.

Col. Thierry Dupuis, the county police chief, said Raub was taken into custody upon the recommendation of mental health crisis intervention workers. He said the action was taken under the state's emergency custody statute, which allows a magistrate to order the civil detention and psychiatric evaluation of a person who is considered potentially dangerous.

He said Raub was handcuffed because he resisted officers' attempts to take him into custody.1

1. 2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/21/brandon-j-raub-marine-detained_n_1817484.html

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 7:24 AM EST

I am not defending this soldier's actions but if he had lodged a complaint his purported treatment while in confinement would have stepped up a notch or two. I do not blame him for not filing a complaint against those Marines who held his life in their hands. The military is known for closing ranks to protect their own.

The actions that did happen under combat conditions should have been disclosed instead of being covered up. This causes the public to distrust the Federal Government including the military.

  • 2 votes
#1.4 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 1:32 PM EST

guess it's easier to just stay in line, agree with the moral low ground and protect the real criminals eh buddy? Telling the truth in this country anymore seems to get you branded a traitor.

    #1.5 - Tue Dec 4, 2012 12:51 AM EST
    Reply
    Elena ElleDeleted

    One thing people forget is Manning was the first domino in the Wikileaks chain of events. Wikileaks led to an entire downfall of regimes throughout the extremist Islamic states. History will read the succession of government revolutions that way. Manning's gotta take the fall but he really was the trigger that led to some serious sheizen in the middle east.

    Assange was just the reporter - unlike that tard from CNN that leaked Valerie Plame's active CIA status in Iran during wartime, and should have been hung for treason.

    • 8 votes
    Reply#3 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 3:27 AM EST

    How the Govt seems to really want people to believe that this kid, with only a blank CD-RW(which can hold only 700MB of data) is the only person to grab that info from the pentagon? Where were the security measures to prevent it? And the Govt really expects me to believe this kid did it NUMEROUS TIMES(remember, there were over 10 gigs of data released so he had to do this hundreds of times on a CD-RW, which it was stated a blank CD by the Govt themselves, not DVD which holds 4.7 gigs) and was the only one? Sorry I don't buy it.

    Incidentally, if I treated one of my kids the way this guy has been treated in prison, I would be sent to prison, so why is this kids Constitutional Rights being withheld? I do not blame him for not mentioning it to his family at all, because if he did, and the family spoke up, his treatment would get worse. Happens all the time.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#4 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 7:42 AM EST

    Did you ever serve in the military? Ever hear of the Red Line Brig at Portsmouth? They probably don't have them anymore, but they were hellholes where all transgressions, however slight, were guaranteed to get you a beating. I'm not talking a slap in the face, or a punch in the nose, but a real, multi-player beat down. Bradley wouldn't have lasted three days in one of them. The fact that today's military allows such obvious pansies as Manning to even serve is part of the problem. A real momma's boy. Whatever bad comes his way, he deserves.

    • 2 votes
    #4.1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 10:00 AM EST

    (remember, there were over 10 gigs of data released so he had to do this hundreds of times on a CD-RW, which it was stated a blank CD by the Govt themselves, not DVD which holds 4.7 gigs)

    Hundreds of CDs, each holding ~600-650MB in order to hold 10GB?

    Incidentally, if I treated one of my kids the way this guy has been treated in prison, I would be sent to prison, so why is this kids Constitutional Rights being withheld?

    What Constitutionally protected rights are being withheld? What specific problems do you have with the way he was detained?

      #4.2 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 10:07 AM EST

      Ringo, Manning's lawyer filed a motion of dismisal for violation of his right to a speedy trial for one. His Eighth Amendment rights were violated, cruel and unusual punishment for "speaking out against his treatment" whereby he was placed in a 6x8 cell 23 hours a day and made to stand naked without even the support of a wall during waking hours. Senator David Kucinich was denied access to him during one visit to Quantico. He was deprived of sleep. It goes on and on. Where have you been that you have not heard of his treatment?

      I am providing a link to a British news agency since we do not always get the full details here in the US:

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/10/bradley-manning-military-code-lawyer

      • 3 votes
      #4.3 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 12:41 PM EST

      Ringo, Manning's lawyer filed a motion of dismisal for violation of his right to a speedy trial for one.

      They were also the people demanding that classified information be released, which caused most of the delays...

      His Eighth Amendment rights were violated, cruel and unusual punishment for "speaking out against his treatment" whereby he was placed in a 6x8 cell 23 hours a day and made to stand naked without even the support of a wall during waking hours.

      He didn't have to be naked or stand up until he made a noose and joked about killing himself. Either he was honestly interested in suicide (in which case this may well have saved his life) or he was joking about it, which is still his fault.

      He was allowed to sleep 9 hours a night, could sit down and relax as he desired during the say, could watch television regularly, and could freely talk to the detainees in other cells.

      Where have you been that you have not heard of his treatment?

      Where have I been? I've been to that brig (not as a detainee) and I know the person that was in the cell beside him. Where have YOU been?

      • 3 votes
      #4.4 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 12:58 PM EST

      Sorry Ringo, I doubt the veracity of your (unsupported) claim- mostly because you talk as if you would prefer he be punished no matter what the circumstances. Quantico was never specific as to where exactly he was being held, plus all accounts state they deprived him of sleep and at best would only allow him 2200 to 0500 for sleeping. His complaints are well documented and even detailed by a member of congress. Of course if you have proof.....

      • 3 votes
      #4.5 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 3:38 PM EST

      Sorry Ringo, I doubt the veracity of your (unsupported) claim- mostly because you talk as if you would prefer he be punished no matter what the circumstances.

      You can doubt the rotation of the Earth, it still won't change the facts. As for punishment, I support punishment if he's guilty, and none if he isn't......something you would already know if you thought to ask instead of just making assumptions.

      Quantico was never specific as to where exactly he was being held, plus all accounts state they deprived him of sleep and at best would only allow him 2200 to 0500 for sleeping. His complaints are well documented and even detailed by a member of congress. Of course if you have proof.....

      He was being held in the brig. That makes it pretty simple, since it is a small facility. Documenting that someone claims something is exactly that: a documentation that they've claimed something. It is not documentation that it actually was a true claim. There are well documented claims that people with light skin are far superior to people with dark skin. Do you actually believe that is true?

      • 1 vote
      #4.6 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 5:19 PM EST

      Somehow your question does not surprise me.

      No proof. Good day.

      • 1 vote
      #4.7 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 8:07 PM EST

      Somehow your question does not surprise me.

      No proof. Good day.

      Somehow your avoidance of questions does not surprise me. You have no evidence.

      Good day

        #4.8 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 9:20 PM EST

        See, Ringo is one of those types of special people that need to take revenge on the world for not all being 'MURICANS! See, REAL 'MURICANS don't need any inconvenient facts to get in the way of a good Fox News narrative, and they sure as heck don't need to think for themselves or prove anything. The ring of "truthiness" fed to us by the powers that be should be plenty! Right? Wow, and you dolts are worried about a "fiscal" cliff, got news for ya bub, we done already tumbled over the "morality" cliff. Thanks for playing!

          #4.9 - Tue Dec 4, 2012 12:58 AM EST

          So what you're saying, Ed, is that you have no real argument to make or anything of value to say. Lacking those things, you decide to lamely troll on the internet.

          Five lines of text, and Ed couldn't get anything remotely close to the topic or reality.

          See, REAL 'MURICANS don't need any inconvenient facts to get in the way of a good Fox News narrative, and they sure as heck don't need to think for themselves or prove anything.

          You RWNJs are just sad

            #4.10 - Tue Dec 4, 2012 8:10 AM EST

            mike3775, the DOD IT Security Office would have immediately known this kid was downloading data from their servers. I believe they let him do this so the IT Police could follow the trail. I have been around IT offices for a long time in my career to know IT knows every keystroke you have made along with every file you have viewed. This kid was definitely set up by his own government and made the patsy for a larger fish. There can be no other explanation or defense. IT security offices know all events that occur on their system, period.

              #4.11 - Sun Feb 3, 2013 10:50 AM EST
              Reply

              LOVE all you people shedding tears for this guy>

              I have an idea!...Shed some tears for the soldiers being sent home in coffins/or without arms and legs.

              If you don't like our military and our govt_LEAVE.

              You won't be missed

              signed

              SGT J H

              Vietnam vet-USMC

              • 1 vote
              Reply#5 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 8:12 AM EST

              Funny, last time I checked, the United States Constitution stated this:

              Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

              So what does that mean? WE AS CITIZENS ARE FREE TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST ANYTHING WE FEEL IS WRONG. You saying "If you don't like our military and our govt_LEAVE." means that you support the way President Putin of Russia feels, JAIL ALL DISSEDENTS AND HOLD BULL@!$%# TRIALS FOR SPEAKING UP AGAINST BULL@!$%#. If you don't like the fact that the US Constitution APPLIES TO ALL, maybe you are the one who should move, preferably to a country that has views like you hold, like Russia, China and Cuba

              • 4 votes
              #5.1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 9:52 AM EST

              Hey Rom - We don't like paying for useless wars, trumped up with false evidence by Zionists. Perhaps you enjoyed your time over there, but just remember, our freedoms were never in jeopardy from anyone in Afghanistan or Iraq. We went over there to secure gas and oil pipelines for Israel and our oil companies. You were only a tool to be used for their profits.

              We do shed tears for those soldiers who died for wars based on trumped up lies. Example: The mobile biological weapons labs were actually for filling weather balloons. The Niger documents were forgeries. Do you ever wonder who forged them and why?

              Here is one of the ways they sold the war.

              Zionist
              warmongers like Ken Adelman and the Zionist Washington Post pushed the war in
              an editorial titled, “Cakewalk in Iraq.” Jewish supremacists Richard Perle and
              Paul Wolfowitz told you that Iraq would “Welcome us as liberators.” Iraq became
              the longest war in American history. Here is a report from USA Today: “Pentagon
              officials estimated for the first time Wednesday that up to 360,000 Iraq and
              Afghanistan veterans may have suffered traumatic brain injuries.” Now that’s
              not counting tens of thousands who have suffered maiming, amputations, or death
              in this war based on lies.

              • 3 votes
              #5.2 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 12:15 PM EST

              @ Sgt J H, under don't ask, don't tell - this namby pamby little puke would have been DD'd and there wouldn't have been a security breach. Screw politically correct they're volunteers and they're being held to a lesser standard than those of us who served during the Draft years. $78/month after boot camp didn't buy squat, but serving in a war zone almost doubled that and you got rewarded with the aroma of Hoppe's #9 and cordite. Hooah.

              What some of these people are missing, is that Manning took an oath to "uphold and defend" against all enemies foreign and domestic; by divulging confidential information, no matter how trivial it may seem to the uninformed it jeopardized others.

              • 1 vote
              #5.3 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 3:26 PM EST

              Right, shed tears for all the troops that died, I totally agree, but think about this, THEY WOULD BE ALIVE IF IT HADN'T BEEN FOR A WAR BASED ON LIES!

              • 1 vote
              #5.4 - Tue Dec 4, 2012 12:59 AM EST

              Bubby's Grampa

              @ Sgt J H, under don't ask, don't tell - this namby pamby little puke would have been DD'd and there wouldn't have been a security breach. Screw politically correct they're volunteers and they're being held to a lesser standard than those of us who served during the Draft years. $78/month after boot camp didn't buy squat, but serving in a war zone almost doubled that and you got rewarded with the aroma of Hoppe's #9 and cordite. Hooah.

              What some of these people are missing, is that Manning took an oath to "uphold and defend" against all enemies foreign and domestic; by divulging confidential information, no matter how trivial it may seem to the uninformed it jeopardized others.

              I love it when uber-'MURICANS bring up the oath and conveniently forget that "all enemies, foreign and domestic" INCLUDES THE WORD DOMESTIC! I suppose we should all be happy we are strafing journalists and laughing about it eh? Real good guy.

                #5.5 - Tue Dec 4, 2012 1:03 AM EST
                Reply

                Like all folks that get to cool their heels in prison for awhile, Manning had plenty of time to concoct a story with his attorney's to try to make himself look like a victim.

                The only victims here are the folks in our military, and other supporters around the world that he jeopardized. I would bet that many of the folks that worked with the U.S. in Afghanistan are already dead. Let's stay focused on the real truly heinous crime.

                • 2 votes
                Reply#6 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 8:45 AM EST

                If our troops were not in Iraq illegally in the first place(incidentally where are the weapons of mass destruction Saddam had?), none would have been killed.

                • 2 votes
                #6.1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 9:53 AM EST

                Troops were diverted to Iraq from Afghanistan due to intelligence reports, odd that after all these years military intelligence still seems an oxymoron.

                Due to this we missed our best opportunity, prior to Abbottabad, to expunge the tall dialysis patient. That and the chubby intern under the Resolute desk, which may or may not have caused the lack of a green light for scout/sniper teams who had eyes on OBL prior to 9/11.

                  #6.2 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 3:43 PM EST
                  Reply

                  When a person exposes gaffe, do it for the social/political reasons not for money. He made lots of money.

                    Reply#7 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 8:46 AM EST

                    Manning made "lots of money"? While in a brig? Are you serious?

                    • 1 vote
                    #7.1 - Tue Dec 4, 2012 1:04 AM EST
                    Reply

                    jerk.

                      Reply#8 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 8:53 AM EST

                      Manning did not realize he was 'being mistreated' until he got his scum sucking shyster lawyer. Any lawyer who would represent Manning should get the same punishment the whining little weasel gets -- including death -- when he is convicted. He knew what he was doing and it was premeditated. He did it while stationed in a war zone and he compromised security for thousands of military personnel. He gave away classified information to our enemies and showed absolutely no remorse. He is a spy and a traitor. He has no defense except for the lies his lawyer will prepare him to repeat.

                      • 2 votes
                      Reply#9 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 8:54 AM EST

                      Manning got what he deserved at Quantico. It's no different than what happens to a child molester who gets hard time and discovers the contempt other inmates have for "short-eyes".

                      • 1 vote
                      #9.1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 3:46 PM EST
                      Reply

                      Manning the poster child for STUPID - he didn't do this act for any patriotic reasons, he did it because he was mad at the he had been dumped, go back and read some of the earlier news articles. His thought process, " I will get even with everyone". He deserves everything he gets.

                        Reply#10 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 9:29 AM EST

                        I don't care if they put Bradley Manning in a cage and slowly lower it into a pool of piranhas. His continued existence serves no useful purpose whatsoever. He was a member of the military. He broke the military rules in a major way. He committed treason. He needs to go. Now.

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#11 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 9:48 AM EST

                        What about his superior officers who did nothing to stop this LOWLY E-3(IIRC correctly)? When I was in the Navy, when a friend in CIC let me in, and the XO saw me in there(I had no clearance for that room), not only did I get a dressing down, so did my friend, and so did my friends LPO, LCPO, and Department head. How come no one above Manning has been charged with allowing this to happen, since as I pointed out earlier in this thread, he had to do it over a long stretch of time. Again, notice how only 1 person has been charged.

                        There is a coverup going on over this, there is no way an E-3 could grab gigabytes of data using only a CD-RW. Where were the security measures at the Pentagon? How come no one noticed that gigabytes of data was accessed over time by the same PC continually? Oh yeah, gotta protect the higher ups like Petraeus.

                        • 1 vote
                        #11.1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 9:57 AM EST

                        On what unit, and what was the nature of your deployment when the incursion into CIC occurred? Even though it's common for CIC personnel to need Secret or Top Secret clearances there is a level of normal traffic that does occur that doesn't require this same clearance level.

                        • 1 vote
                        #11.2 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 3:51 PM EST
                        Reply

                        one must remember that MSN news is part of the govt. propaganda machine, that puts the ring in our noses to lead us to believe the govt. bull@!$%#. those of us that watched the interview on DEMOCRACY NOW (LINK TV) got an entirly different story reported, about the hearing!

                        • 2 votes
                        Reply#12 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 9:56 AM EST

                        So you would rather listen to a different propaganda machine, and claim righteousness? Sorry! Wrong answer! Next!

                        • 2 votes
                        #12.1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 10:02 AM EST
                        Reply

                        Please, court martial Manning and lock him up already. Manning is vermin.

                          Reply#13 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 10:02 AM EST

                          Steven - Lets lock up Larry Franklin and the 2 AIPAC cohorts to whom he passed on American secrets. They are vermin.

                            #13.1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 12:19 PM EST
                            Reply

                            He did stupid (and somewhat childish) things, without concern for the consequences, like a spoiled brat, expecting a slap on his wrists. Now he knows how serious it is, and will look for any possible way out, whether it is all lies or not (his lawyers, by the way, are paid to lie about the innocence of their clients, so you can discount whatever the defense atty's say.)

                            He deserves whatever punishment he receives. I personally wish it were a capital offense.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#14 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 11:25 AM EST

                            It basically is a capital offense when he compromised the security of people in the middle east theater. He's lucky he wasn't allowed access to the yard at Quantico.

                            • 2 votes
                            #14.1 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 3:55 PM EST
                            Reply

                            What he did was wrong. He knew it or else he wouldn't have had to sneak around. He got caught. I wouldn't like to be in his position either but he put himself there. Enough about him, what about the other people he put in danger and he doesn't care. He's no hero. He is a thief of US documents while in military service. Please finish it up, give him his sentece and let's move on.

                              Reply#15 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 12:51 PM EST

                              He did not leak info for a noble purpose.He did it as he was mad about DADT.The fact that he did this for a little bitch reason ought to be enough to have him locked up for good.Killing isn't on the table though that would be great.Rmember-NO NOBLE PURPOSE for this,only a little pansys' reason

                                Reply#16 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 3:59 PM EST

                                Let the kid go! The newspapers made the information public and they weren't prosecuted. The government doesn't just classify strategically sensitive material, it classifies anything that might be embarrassing or that might outrage the citizenry, things we should probably be made aware of.

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#17 - Sat Dec 1, 2012 10:07 PM EST

                                The risk/reward ratio for whistleblowers is great. It's not for everyone, but if you want to learn how to blow the whistle from a veteran whistleblower, check out my blog on the Huff Post:

                                  Reply#18 - Sun Dec 2, 2012 2:21 PM EST
                                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.