A worker in the Connecticut Medical Examiner's office has been accused of letting her husband look at the body of Newtown gunman Adam Lanza, a state employee with knowledge of the investigation told the Associated Press.
Jean Henry, a processing technician, was placed on administrative leave Dec. 21 so the allegation can be investigated, the official said. The employee spoke to the AP on condition of anonymity because the inquiry was under way. The investigation was first reported by The Hartford Courant.
Gov. Dannel Malloy said he will be "deeply disappointed" if investigators from the University of Connecticut Health Center verify that Henry engaged in such ghoulish behavior. "I hope that was not true. The investigation is ongoing," Malloy said.
Lanza's body was brought to the morgue in Farmington after he committed suicide at Sandy Hook Elementary School, where he murdered 20 first graders and six staffers on Dec. 14.
Two days after the massacre, Henry allegedly led her husband into her workplace and led him into the refrigerated room where bodies are kept until autopsy. They allegedly unzipped Lanza's bag so they could look at the body of the reviled gunman, sources told the Hartford Courant.
Henry's boss, Chief Medical Examiner H. Wayne Carver II, performed the autopsy on Lanza. The gunman's body was later claimed by his father.
Carver did not return calls and Henry and her lawyer could not be reached for comment. She is embroiled in a lawsuit against Malloy that claims the Democratic governor had her bounced from her old job in the budget office because she is a Republican.
More content from NBCNews.com:
- Fiscal cliff deal includes at least $67.9 billion for special interests
- Sen. Crapo pleads guilty to DWI, seeks 'forgiveness'
- Profanity-laced YouTube video gets officer fired
- Video: ‘Pecs,’ ‘legs,' ‘frisking’: Biden works the room at photo-op
- Court voids rape conviction because woman not married
Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook



Who cares? Wasn't all that long ago it was normal to put dead bodies of scumbags on display.
This mutt should be dumped in the ocean as fish food.
Seems like everyone so far has the same opinion that I do... So what? Why does an accident in the northbound lane of a freeway also slow the southbound lanes to a crawl? Because people want to see the wreck in all its gory details! They even have a term for it (a "gapers block").... People just seem to have a morbid curiosity. Google "Lincoln in his casket" and you will see that someone snuck a camera in to take a picture of Abraham Lincoln lying in state in 1865.
So she showed him. Big deal. I bet most every medical examiner (if they are honest) has done something similar. Now if they had taken pictures and put them on the internet it would be a different story, but this is much ado about nothing. Time to move this story offline as a yawner.
Hopefully someone urinated all over the body.
huh? what? que? co? τι;什麼?
John,I care and it is a big deal.People's loved ones deceased should not be used for people's perverse curiosity.
I think she said it's the democratic governors fault since he "bounced" her from her old job. Maybe she doesn't understand how "appointments" work.
I agree, I think his body should have been hung in public so that people could spit at it and desecrate it as much as possible. Discourage future killers.
So what?...It's an infamous piece of meat.
Much ado...
watch the other hand cul....something here is amiss.
This has to be one of the biggest waste of tax dollars I have heard of yet! An investigation? Really? "We have to investigate someone looking at a dead body!" OMG!!!! A travesty!!!!
Who gives a Damn!!!
... PC idiots and nanny-state drones have taken over society ... so what if this piece of s*** is put on display!
The shooter was a human that suffered from mental problems and didn't get the help he needed.
The comments on this board show exactly how coarse we have become as a nation. Do any of you as Christians blame God for creating Adam Lanza's defective mind? Perhaps we should desecrate and spit on God? And if we find that his mother didn't have her guns properly secured with a mentally disabled person in the house should her body also be hung in the city square? Nothing good will come from screwing with the dead.
Desecrating his body in public would have zero effect on future mass killers. That would mean they were thinking somewhat rationally and that's not how the mind of such a person works. Try and show me anyone who has committed any such act that was "rational"? Good luck with that one.
Maybe he wanted to pork him in the kiester and give him a well deserved send off.
jw101, this is no human being. Personally I would have loved to skin his a$$ alive then scalp him and add salt to his wounds and hear his retched screams for miles around.
She should have just taken a picture with her phone.
Future killers never get discouraged. If they did the death penalty would work. But, it doesn't. Lanza himself was barely a boy himself. I was struck by how one of the fathers of a little girl who was killed by Lanza expressed his condolences to Lanza's father during a press conference. Now, there's compassion that few of us could muster.
jw101
The shooter was a human that suffered from mental problems and didn't get the help he needed.
Seriously? I don't think you'd feel that way if he had shot YOUR loved ones....
Just to keep the story current,till they figure out how to get the firearms.
Thats all.
Uhhh... maybe it's because policies and procedures were violated?
sorry, I think he gave up his membership card to the human race when he killed the first 6 year old
@ commonsense Policy and procedures were violated in Fast and Furious,wheres the NBC headlines?
They should bury him face down so he can see where he is going.
First of all, not a single authority has come out and said unequivocally that Adam Lanza was the shooter nor have they stated the nature of his death. Only the mainstream, Zionist owned news media are extending that hypothesis and so many of you have fallen right into the witch hunt. Best wishes when you're disarmed and being marched off to an indefinite detention facility because they claim you possess the "evil" gene. I wonder why the mainstream media hasn't said anything else about the other 2 suspects, one seen fleeing the scene by neighbors of the school and the other apprehended in the woods behind the school. Now I'm pretty sure a person on here who goes by the name State_of_Awareness had my other account shut down on Newsvine for disseminating all these same links. If you people believe in the truth then it would be to your benefit, before they take down this post, to copy these links, start doing some research on your own and ask questions because there is more to this story than some distraught, autistic young man went and murdered a bunch of children at some random school he attended over 10 years prior. I mean if his beef was with schools why did he drive right past his old high school, the place where most of his alleged social problems began, on the way to the elementary school? Open up your eyes people and think with your own minds for a change instead of allowing yourselves to be led by the mainstream, Zionist owned media.
Wonderful, well played on the censorship Newsvine. Just add the http and the www at the front of each of those
toddd....oh toddd
we're comming to get you.......quick, hide in the closet
make light of it if you like but then you just make yourself a sheeple Lori and you can clown me all you like but that doesn't change the truth of the information I have presented in my previous comment.
truth, ha, you're just a loon
you accept the Zionist owned mainstream media's version of this matter as the gospel and you have the nerve to label me a loon? That is rich!!! I always appreciate judgments from mindless drones like you Lori, that lets me know I'm doing something right. Personally I would rather know the real truth for the sake of all those innocent murdered children, apparently you don't really care about them though
Todd, your medication has worn off! Or are you just spoofing us with your "anti-zionist media" rant?
I was wrong,
you're an ass and a loon
Actually, I suspect I would feel even more strongly if it were my loved ones. The only way to prevent this in the future, in a country as rife with guns are we are intent on being, is to seriously assess and advance our mental health assistance/protections in this country.
The reason there are so many 'crazies,' is that nobody is doing anything to help the 'crazies.' Parents, even wealthy educated parents, don't know who to turn to, how to get help for their children who are obviously not 'right.' Then think about all the adults who are similarly afflicted, with no one to tell them they need help, no way to pay for it, no way out.
It's not the guns, it's the MINDS.
Perhaps the technician should be reprimanded, but put on leave seems a bit harsh.
But, just wait ... there's a lawsuit lurking in the wings somewhere ...
Right with you Lori!!
and you're saying that people like Baron David De Rothschild and fellow Zionists don't own 95% of all the media outlets in the country? And before you display too much ignorance you might want to learn the difference between a Jew and a Zionist Stillworking but like I said, calling me names or trying to make me look bad doesn't lessen by one iota the truth of the information at the links I have provided but I doubt either one of you sleepy, sheeple cowards will have the courage to look at the real truth because it is too inconvenient to your cushy little lives. Now I could care less if the lot of you sheeple fall off the face of the Earth. I did what I needed to do, put the leads to the truth out there for those with courage to see.
time to toss that ol' copy of the "protocols of the elders of zion"
Not every shooter suffers from mental problems and didn't get needed help. Some people are just evil and act out of that. Some seem to deny the existence of evil, but it exists and it's in more and more people every day.
Looks like chuckster is a prime candidate for our revised and updated Mental Health Care Campaign.
Lanza sure didn't care who ogled...in fact he would be pleased he had an extended audience post mortem.
I disagree Bruce. jw101 was right, and I'll put forth that anyone who does anything remotely like this is as well.
But the rest of that is... they still made a choice (here's where the evil comes into play). A choice to kill 20 tiny children and 6 adults in this case.
Right up until the trigger pull he is redeemable.
After that he's like a grizzly who's killed a human. He's got to be put down.
Jesus can save his soul but his body shall breathe no more.
phuck that @!$%# ,they should post the pics of that a hole Adam Lanza up all over the internet as well as let the public pee and puke all over his corpse ! he was a POS and deserves to be treated as such
Go Lori Go!
We are in fact coming to get Todd the wad!
and if we can't find him ... we'll just collaspe all of his worthless comments!
here we go just one more article on the total A$$hole that caused all the grief..and if you think it is good to show the remains of the no good SOB that committed this act then you are not much better than him.He deserves no news time and no glory.As for the woman at the morgue you are not worthy of your job.what else has been going on there with the deceased??
There are policies and procedures about these things for a reason. How would all you "let someone violate the rules because he was scum (which we all agree he was)" crowd feel if someone took a photo of, say, your deceased mom's vagina and then argued because it was not an offense meriting discipline in THIS case, it should not be in yours?
Hopefully the woman's husband climbed up and took a long hard piss all over him.
We don't even know that Adam Lanza wanted "fame". We don't know what his thought process was. . . or what his mother's thought processes were (since she owned the guns).
Yes, at one time the bodies of convicts were put on public display, often drawn and quartered. Guess what? Societies were more violent back then too. Statistically, violence has decreased over the centuries.
Better for him to visit her at her work than for her to bring her work home.
If she is fired for this, I think whomever leaked the details to the media should be fired as well. After all, they are BOTH violations of policy.
"Zionist owned mainstream" "Zionist owned news media" "First of all, not a single authority has come out and said unequivocally that Adam Lanza was the shooter nor have they stated the nature of his death."Only the mainstream, Zionist owned news media are extending that hypothesis and so many of you have fallen right into the witch hunt. Best wishes when you're disarmed and being marched off to an indefinite detention facility because they claim you possess the "evil" gene."Zionist owned media"" the difference between a Jew and a Zionist Stillworking "
Just what the heck is wrong with you? You rant and rave about hating Jews and Israel no matter what the article is about. Not a thing you have stated is true in the real world, just in your demented conspiracy filled warped brain. Why don't you go live by yourself on a deserted Island, and leave the real world to the rational adults. You and your kind make me ill.
so wanting a second opinion is considered ghoulish? maybe he has been reading all the hush hush do not talk about it or youll be prosecuted ideas....
I can understand the possibility of contaminating evidence...maybe. Otherwise this is a non issue. Who cares who saw the monsters body. I don't. This is not news...really reaching NBC.
Certainly......
Would have absolutely no bearing on this article....would it?.....naw NBC never has an agenda.....
The lady allowing her husband to see the body shouldn't be treated as anything more than a minor infraction and shouldn't even have been newsworthy.
On the other hand,the body should have been donated to science with perhaps a guarantee to the remaining family members that the body's ultimate disposal would not be made known or accessible to the public.
It would be good for the father to tell the authorities whatever he knows about his son and his life with his family until their separation. Also was the separation caused by disagreement between the parents as to how to deal with the son?
should have just cut up or cremated the body,and either toss it out in the trash or flush it down the toilet bowl ,after all Adam Lanza was a POS !
who would want to see this monsters body. I think she and her hubby have issues for wanting to see it BUT i dont think its worth losing a job over.
violate set procedures as well as all common sense at your place of business cause an uproar, bad press, and the possibility of lawsuits, then let us know how that worked out for you...from the unemployment office.
Not sure it's worth losing a job over, but I'm sure it's not "no big deal" for someone who works there. I expect there are all kinds of rules for those who work in this type profession.
Would everyone be so cavalier about it if he'd wanted to check out the children's bodies, too, while he was there?
Really? This is a problem that warrants a solution? Give me a break.
sure would stop that pesky little lawsuit problem though. Is that the solution they were looking for?...ask yourself why else would this make the news? .....
They put procedures in place to protect everyone. Now the question becomes if she showed him one who and how many others has she shown. What if a body is evidence in a murder trial? Great way to get the evidence thrown out. Just say she showed that body to people too and so the evidence is compromised. I am assuming that she probably had to sign documents in regard to procedures and the loss of job if those procedures are violated. Not sure if some of this fall under HIPPA as the person's cause of death could be considered PHI.
Human beings are curious. I'm sure protocols were broken, but this is one of those situations where news of the crime is more harmful than the actual crime itself.
Now the woman gets to sit home and collect a paycheck without having to go to work. I wish I could get "punished" like that. Her current lawsuit practically ensures she won't be fired. Now the people of CT have to pay 2 people to do the job of 1 person.
They should have kept this situation internal, reprimanded her heavily, and then demanded that her butt be at work bright and early the next morning.
The taxpayers of CT are being punished for this woman's lack of judgement, not the woman herself. They now pay double while she vacations for a couple of weeks, fully paid!
I they don't fire her, the taxpayers may be paying much more. Consider the cost of retrying any criminal cases that used evidence from the M.E.'s office when defense attorneys file appeals questioning if evidence could have been tainted.
Can't you hear a Defense Attorney in court saying: "Your Honor, if the M.E.'s Office was unable to maintain security of the remains in a high profile case such as Mr. Lanza'a, it raises serious questions as to whether we can rely on the evidence from that office which was used in convicting my client". . . .(and so on). That's why this certainly IS a big deal and why the M.E.'s Office was correct in making this public and immediately suspending this employee.
who cares is an understatement. BUT, like the old saying goes, you never get "caught" doing something the first time you do it, so the question is " How many other people has she let her hubby take a look at? And NOW it becomes an issue, because it may be YOUR loved one they were messin with....
and as far as this kid, should have been put in an unmarked box in poor man's field with no markers or indicators as to where he is deposited, and forgotten!!
No one said they were messin with the body. It said she showed him the body..
Doesn't mater Kjosee. That body bag should not have been opened by anyone other than the medical examiner. His body was evidence that hadn't been processed. Therefore the evidence bag should not have been opened. Now as Rustyautumn said, anything coming out of that office can now be argued in criminal investigations as being tampered with.
exactly - an internal policy matter. not really a public concern matter, just internal reprimands in the file .
What evidence??? There was how many eyewitnesses that saw him do it. Survivors that said it was him. Please tell me what the hell looking at the body has to do with any of it. Whiny a$$ people need to become a statistic on the suicide charts and just go away.
Right now some sleazbag attorney is trying to figure an angle to sue the state, and find someone... anyone... he can pass off as " victimised" who he can "represent"....while filing paperwork and settling out of court for a few mill......
I don't think they can found 12 people in this world that will award any money for this.
um...what part of;
did you not get?
Lol apparently Robbie's robot brain could not compute any of it!
That's the same thing I was thinking, was "So What?" I don't see myself as someone who would be wanting to gawk at a corpse, but I could understand others, and no offense, but especially males. This is an infamous corpse.
I also strongly agree with Lori, he gave up his membership in the human race when he shot and killed CHILDREN. He lost his dignity and rights, RIGHT THERE, and it's a CORPSE, not a live human.
What DOES a murdering pyschopath look like?
So, if it were your son who went crazy and killed a bunch of people, you'd be on board with burying him in Potter's Field. I don't think so. Taking revenge on someone who is already dead is the ultimate waste of energy.
It would be a waste to make a headstone for him. If someone in my family did what he did then i would have to say I didn't really know who they were at all and thus I wouldn't give 2 craps what they did with the body.
makessense bunch of numbers...I call BS on your post. If it was someone in your family, you would have known he had mental issues, the rest of his family did.
The only reason it would be a waste to make a headstone for him would be because vengeful citizens would most likely deface it. Better to bury him with a marker without a name so his family has a place to mourn him in private.
On that note, I recommend everyone see the movie Beautiful Boy. Paints a very vivid picture of what life is like for the family of the shooter after the fact.
The morgue is not for "sight-seers" unless her husband was identifying a recently deceased family member himself, he had no business peeking into ANY body bag.
I understand that people feel that because Adam Lanza is a monster, it doesnt matter that protocols/rules were broken. However, now she has just opened up an opprtunity for the Lanza family to sue and say their deceased family member was not treated appropriately. Not to mention she has risked her career and professional reputation.
RIP Sandy Hook Victims
Pamalam,The word you were searching for is not monster,it is mentally ill.
Pamalam...you are also assuming she had a professional reputation.
mentally ill is the poor sole wandering the streets muttering to themselves
monster is someone who blows away 20 six year olds in kindergarten
How true IA Scooter...
I hope this woman doesn't lose her job. It was a stupid thing to do, but is it really that big a deal? No, it isn't...
depends on your.."view" ...so to speak.
Jean Henry's and her husbands' actions were inappropriate which I believe should cost her that job.She is not to be trusted any longer and her behavior towards the deceased is not acceptable.
So he looked at it. Why should she be punished? If he stomped and spat on it then it would be another issue.
again;
violate set procedures as well as all common sense at your place of business cause an uproar, bad press, and the possibility of lawsuits, then let us know how that worked out for you...from the unemployment office.
I don't care and from reading the posts here, most people don't care too.
I agree morbid curiosity So what
Wrong, Robbie.... At that point, the body had not been autopsied. Therefore, it was unprocessed evidence in a criminal investigation. Doing anything with the body...even if it is only bringing it out of the cooler to peek at it is tampering with evidence. That could mean charges up to and including obstruction of justice. This foolish woman will be lucky if all she gets from this is fired....
With the way the public feel, if any attorney and relatives of that MONSTER try to sue the state for this will probably get a bullet in the head.
not the way most lawsuits work robbie. most are simply matter of filing forms. and not covered by the press. and sleazebags care about money and nothing else,
And did you know that should you so much as spit on an attorney you can be held for a felony assault charge and in some states "endangerment " to an "officer of the court".....either way its a felony, and you get to appear before a judge who is or was a lawyer. why else do you think they don't get an ass whoppin daily?
Let me reiterate: WHO FRIKKEN' CARES ?!?!
Another example of people looking for reasons to feel "offended".
I am much more upset that the government DID NOT let anyone see Osama Bin Laden's body.....if they really got him.
Right.... Osama has now gone the way of Elvis, huh....? He's not really dead, he just got tired of being the worst terrorist out there and now is no longer going by the name, lives in Sacremento and has had every plastic surgery necessary to make him look like Don Knotts or something.... Right...
Otherwise, I agree, who frikken cares?
Elvis is not dead. He just went home. - Agent K
Could be considered tempering with evidence. Also morally out of respect for the family. If the family wants him displayed they would of had an open casket funeral. I am not defending him I am just stating some reasons why this is an issue. With any type of medical autopsy that involves a crime this is a big no no.
Sounds like she has a problem following the rules. Sounds like the Governor was correct in pushing her out. Fire her.
The Governor is a toad whose kids seriously screwed up many times from selling drugs to a hate crime, were let off by the judge and were given chance after chance. This is essentially a non story. A slap on the wrist would be sufficient.
I actuall think they should show his @!$%#en body to the public to prove that this monster is actually dead.
waste of resources, this is a non-issue in the scheme of things. I think anyone that wants to see should be allowed to see so long as no evidence still needs to be pulled. Autopsy though..really? Waste of tax dollars unless it is being done by a hospital as a learning tool and to research brain disorders or any anomalies in the body.
She should get fired for this . Doesn't matter who the deceased was - her conduct just opened up the M.E.'s office to questions of chain of custody and evidence tampering on other cases.
Protocols and procedures controlling access to morgue are designed to maintain evidentiary integrity of Medical Examiner's findings. She violated this - she should be gone.
I have no idea whether her current lawsuit has any validity, but if this situation is any indication of her judgement, professionalism and maturity - seems like there may have been plenty of reasons an employer wouldn't want her in their organization.
Why is firing someone always the first response? How about a talking to and perhaps a demotion? So you should get fired for a mistake you made at work. I hope you are never in a position where that is true for you!
There are situations where you don't get a "do over" because there are bigger, more serious issues at stake. IMO this is one of those situations. Just like you don't get to let a non-employee or non-authorized person in the pharmacy area of a hospital; or in the area where you process forensic bucal swabs, etc.
This wasn't a convenience store employee who let a friend loiter or step behind the counter into the stock room in spite of the rules.
This was the Medical Examiner's Office. Homicide, suicide and suspicious death investigations take place there and evidence is collected and evaluated. There are very serious, legal decisions made based upon what is generated out of this place. An employee doesn't get to play around to satisfy her husband's and her morbid curiosity.
And yes, I've been in situations where people have been terminated for less. . . where one unlocked door led to job loss.
@ Just a cleaning lady.... Ok i would understand if she had been showing the body of the children this worthless human being so easily murdered. But she didn't. PLease don't sympathize with these demons, he lost all rights even in death after he took the lives of those helpless pchildren. I bet someone like you is probably also a James Holmes sympathizer. Ridiculous. This is why these crazy people think they can go out and kill people and get away with it because they think they have rights. Well once you take the life of a child or any other person, you should be hung and displayed in town square for all the other wack jobs to see.
This is news?
So what's the problem? He was an adult...
Human curiosity never changes. Nor does perversity, sympathy, or he need to heal...
All said, the State would do well to publicly view the corpse, without refrigeration, in the sun, until the crowds get bored with it...
SO what? Why do people always want to fire someone for making a mistake even when it is stupid? Can we not just demote them and train them first? That is what is wrong with this society. We don't want to stop and correct the incorrect action. How will people ever learn? No matter how old someone is, mistakes will happen and people should always be provided an opportunity to learn. This was not such a horrible mistake but it was a stupid one.
This is the kind of work environment where there are protocols and standards when you START working there. She simply showed that she has no problem disregarding those standards.
Tina, you really have no clue here, do you? This goes WAY beyond Adam Lanza and what he did.
It doesn't matter who Jean Henry allowed her husband into the refrigerated room to see. It doesn't matter if it was Adam Lanza, John Doe or one of Henry's own deceased relatives.
I'm sure there were more bodies in that room than just Adam Lanza's. Would it have been alright for Jean Henry to show her husband the body of a woman who was beaten to death by her husband? Would it have been alright for her to show him the body of a man who had died in a horrible car accident? Has she in the past? Would she again had she not been caught the next time another case that was "interesting" to her or her husband came along?
The fact of the matter here is that Jean Henry knew the protocols and procedures of working at the medical examiners office from the minute she was hired. She knew the sensitive nature of the work she was entrusted with every day and she knew that she was breaking those protocols and procedures and doing something very, very wrong by leading her husband into the facility and to the refrigerated room. But, for whatever reason, she took it upon herself to completely disregard those protocols and procedures to satisfy her husbands curiosity, her own or both. She put herself and her husband above all else and, yes, there is something wrong with that.
The very fact that an unauthorized individual was in a secure room where he had no business being has jeopardized any potential ongoing criminal cases housed there. There's a little thing called "contamination" that can make or break a criminal case. For example: say for instance a few hours before this tragedy had happened a guy had walked into a convenience store, robbed it and shot three people in the store before fleeing. He was caught later that evening and taken into custody and the bodies of the victims were being housed at the morgue for autopsy. It is critical that the names of every single person who comes near those bodies is known. If when the M.E. does the autopsy and finds physical evidence that he cannot link to anyone else in the store, their loved ones and friends they might have had contact with around the times of the murders or to the suspect in custody, there's a big hole in the prosecutions case. Turns out, there is a hair that somehow transferred from Mr. Henry to one of those innocent murder victims because Jean Henry was careless enough in her job to think she was above the same protocol and procedures the rest of her co-workers maintain. Jean Henry just created enough reasonable doubt to set that guy that robbed a convenience store and murdered three innocent people free to do it again. If one of those three people had been your husband, son or parent would that have been alright with you just because this woman was satisfying her and her husbands morbid curiosity?
In my opinion, she deserves more than just being fired for this. She needs to be prosecuted for her stupidity and lack of good judgment. This issue has nothing to do with Adam Lanza. It has everything to do with someone who has tainted this medical examiners office and every single case they have worked while she has been an employee there. If she has broken one rule, chances are she has broken others. Yes, that is something very serious, very newsworthy and very worth an extensive investigation.
Are you trying to excuse this conduct by calling it a mistake? She didn't make a mistake. She intentionally allowed her husband to view a body in the morgue. This wasn't an inadvertant act, like hitting the wrong button on your computer. She knew what she was doing and deserves termination...
Too many of you are basing your opinion on the deceased instead of on the stupid behavior of the employee...