
Courtesy of Ashley Broadway
Ashley Broadway, left, married her 15-year companion, Lt. Col. Heather Mack, in November — their first chance to hold a formal ceremony after the 2011 repeal of "Don't Ask Don't Tell."
An on-base club for Fort Bragg spouses extended a "special guest membership" Thursday night to the lesbian spouse of an Army lieutenant colonel, marking another twist in a six-week-long saga that prompted a pro-gay Marine Corps directive and that has drawn the attention of gay and lesbian activists nationwide.
The Association of Bragg Officers’ Spouses (ABOS) offered Ashley Broadway an invitation to join the group as a “special guest,” but not as a full member — meaning she can attend all club functions but cannot vote on club matters — according to an email to NBC News by the association’s board.
Broadway immediately rejected the overture, calling it “extremely demeaning.” Broadway married her 15-year companion, Lt. Col. Heather Mack, in November — their first chance to hold a formal ceremony after the 2011 repeal of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” the policy that kept gays from openly serving in the military. The couple has a 2-year-old son and Mack is due to give birth to their second child on Sunday.
“I correlate ‘guest membership’ to saying, ‘Heather, you can be gay and be in the military but we’re not going to treat your spouse as equal.’ I can be in this club but I can’t have full membership? That’s not acceptable,” Broadway said in an interview with NBC News Thursday night. “I’m either going to be a member or not. I applied to be a full member with a vote.
“I am declining their offer.”
In a statement mass emailed Thursday evening, the Bragg officers club said some information reported in the media about Broadway’s membership application “has been false or misleading,” including assertions that the board changed its bylaws after Broadway applied.
“In mid-November, ABOS received an inquiry from ... Ashley Broadway, requesting information on the eligibility for membership in ABOS of a same sex spouse. As this was a case of first impression, she was told that such a request would need to be studied,” read the club’s statement.
Since going public with her story, Broadway has maintained that she received a phone call during the first week of December from a club representative, informing her that Mary Ring, the group’s president, had rejected her application because Broadway does not have a military spouse identification card. (The U.S. military does not recognize same-sex marriage under the Defense of Marriage Act and does not offer benefits — or ID cards — to same-sex spouses.) Broadway also serves as director of family affairs at the American Military Partner Association, a fact mentioned by ABOS leaders in their explanation of the events.
“ABOS’ membership application does not explicitly require a valid (Department of Defense) ID Card but some member benefits and events do require a valid DoD ID Card,” the club’s statement continued. “ABOS received Ms. Broadway’s letter requesting reconsideration on Friday, December 7 and by Monday, December 10 a similar letter to the ABOS President was published on her organization’s website.
“ABOS’ by-laws were never changed retroactively in an attempt to exclude anyone. The ABOS Board’s bi-annual review of the by-laws began in July 2012, at which time the by-laws were removed from the ABOS website and continue to be under review,” the statement said. “Since the by-laws were written and adopted well before the repeal of ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’, the term ‘Spouse’ is not defined.”
In a separate email to NBC News, the club’s board maintained that Broadway was never rejected by the Bragg social club because “a formal application was never filed,” and that she simply had inquired about membership eligibility of a same sex spouse and was told the club would need “time to look at the issue.”
The "special guest" invitation to Broadway sparked criticism and skepticism Thursday night from Stephen Peters, president of the American Military Partner Association, a Washington, D.C.-based resource and support network for lesbian and gay military families.
“So that leaves the question of: If the bylaws and the application do not explicitly require a valid DoD ID card, why is she still being denied full membership?” Peters asked. “What do certain unnamed ‘events’ requiring a valid DoD ID card have to do with anything?"
Before the ABOS website was made fully password protected and before the group took down its Facebook page – both done after initial reports of Broadway’s membership battle surfaced – the American Military Partner Association took screenshots of both sites. The ABOS website and Facebook page “were changed retroactively in order to add the requirement of an ID card after Ashley applied for membership,” according to Peters. Those screenshots were shared Thursday with NBC News.
As of Thursday night, the website was fully accessible and no longer password protected.
“It's fantastic that they have finally contacted Ashley after a month of silence, but if the ABOS mission is to support all military families, why are they continuing to deny same-sex military spouses full membership?” Peters asked. “Offering ‘guest membership’ to Ashley is like offering her ‘second-class membership status.’ There is no valid reason why she should not be offered full membership as outlined in the organization's bylaws.”
Citing the Broadway flap, the U.S. Marine Corps on Dec. 9 issued a branch-wide directive that same-sex spouses be allowed to participate in spouses clubs at all Marine bases.
On Wednesday, Pentagon officials said they support a decision by leaders at Fort Bragg not to intervene in the matters of its on-base spouses club.
The legal basis for the Pentagon’s stance is a Department of Defense “instruction” drafted in 2008, three years before the repeal of the “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy, a Pentagon spokesman said. That directive ensures that “non-federal entities” operating on U.S. military installations don’t discriminate on the basis of “race, color, creed, sex, age, disability, or national origin.” There is no mention of discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Broadway, meanwhile, has been nominated for the Fort Bragg Military Spouse of the Year award, a precursor to the Army Military Spouse of the Year award and — perhaps, ultimately — the 2013 Armed Forces Insurance Military Spouse of the Year award, which represents all branches. She is one of about 10 Bragg spouses nominated for the award from that base. Online voting for the base-level award takes place Jan. 22.
Related: Pentagon opts not to intervene in ban of lesbian by Fort Bragg spouses club
Related: Marine Corps orders spouses clubs to allow same-sex members
Related: Same-sex wife of Army officer banned from Fort Bragg spouses club


The "offer" is like from the 50's down south. "Ya'll colored folk can look at the white's only water fountain, but ya can't drink from it."
The 'gracious offer' is still a snub.
It's nice for the public to see where you can't simply do a job in the army. It has to be a constant pissing contest over trivia - and they wonder why people jump out the window.
I am getting tired of this "soldiers" story.
In the last several weeks it just seems like she is looking for an excuse to grab the "Limelight" in her quest for "Equality". Well, I for one would not go looking to join organizations that DON'T want me, and two, once she/they get in, what kind of attitude are they going to display after not being asked to join in a lot of the activities?
In my life, I enjoy an "elevated" status, where because of my knowledge, skills, abilities and finances I have been asked to join the local country club. I have been there a few times and enjoyed the people I have met and talked with, but I won't join because I consider my self "Scooter Trash". For those of you who don't know that what term means, it means extreme motorcycle enthusiast.
I would much rather spend my free time traveling Americas highways and byways, meeting everyday salt of the earth people, seeing beautiful sights, experiencing what I consider total freedom.
No offense to the countryclub scene, it's their choice, not mine, if they want to spend saturday morning playing "pasture pool" (a game I am not fond of even tho' my ancestors invented it) thats fine. And I respect it.
You won't see me filing a federal civil suit against the Hells Angels because they wont let me into their club house either, I prefer to enjoy going where I know I am and will be welcome by people that will enjoy my presence and company.
And Mr. Cheetah, thats the reason I only put in 9 yrs rather than 20, couldn't be a soldier anymore without a degree in political B.S.
Well now they are Politically Correct.....
Well, if she stopped now she'd lose everything she fought for as well as her principals. The media is the one that brought the spotlight on the bigoted group of army wives, and now she/they have to roll with it, even if at this point it should be clear to them they wouldn't even want to join this club if they could. Think about it.... A bunch of rumor spreading, disgusting, fat army wives sitting around giving you judgmental glares.. Not a club I'd want to join.
Stop whining. GO into the club or don't.
The Club you should be joining is the Health club on base.
"...bigoted group of army wives..."
What nonsense. The army wives have a right to include or exclude anyone who does not meet their definition of "army wives". If the male "wife" of a homosexual couple wants to join, should he be allowed to? I don't think so.
How come homosexuals like to pollute everything that heterosexuals are involved in? Why don't they start their own Same-Sex Army Spouse Club, the way Gay Bars are set up for gays? After all, they have the right to do anything and be anything in today's America.
dave-1091320
You do realize the debate is over the definition of "spouse". There are female officers who have male spouses. Or are you still of the opine that women should not be in uniform?
I guess that answers my above questions.. that sounds like the same arguments used pre civil rights.....
'Separate but equal' is not equal. Did we learn nothing from the civil rights movement of the 60's?
Dave:
It's the Ft Bragg Army Spouses' club. By it's name, it is open to all spouses of all serving members at Ft. Bragg, male or female.
And no, gays don't have the right to do certain things in America, that's the whole point of the gay right movement. They want the same rights as everyone else has.
I agree with Dave. If gay men and women want to have a spouses club then do it. Otherwise let the hetero spouses take a vote and let the MAJORITY vote stand!
Sick and tired of a minority group wanting to change or impose their beliefs on the majority of people who want nothing to do with it. This has nothing to do with the group. These women want to be heard and want the club to see it their way. They want to win this argument plain and simple. If I was gay I would not want to be a part of this club because they already express they do not want me. These women have another agenda other than being a part of this club.
Actually, unless we are deceiving ourselves (as many are obviously doing), homosexual couples are NOT equal to heterosexual couples. In a heterosexual couple, you don't have to ask yourself who is the "wife" and who is the "husband"; nature makes that clear from a mile away. Homosexuals are the same sides of a coin, something nature does not intend.
And, while being with anyone you want is your individual right, it is not your right to force everybody to recognize it as a "marriage"; it is not and cannever be. At least as long as humans continue to populate this earth.
It is really an insult on those who fought the civil rights to be lumped together with homosexuals. Civil rights are not anywhere near homosexual rights.
I am sick and tired that these homosexuals want respect and to be treated the same. I treat no gays any different than I do hetero... and I disagree with the gay lifestyle. I will not respect any gay person until they earn it. So all you gay people can quit DEMANDING respect from the hetero community. I will never accept that being gay is right, I will agree that being gay is an acceptable behavior that I can deal with.
Translated to mean: "We won't stop until we get everything we want."
You just can't reason with a militant agenda.
you going to helllll gay bytches
It would have been interesting to see the out come of this had it been a black lesbian couple. Honesty, I believe it would have been different. Had they been denied, obama would have been notified, he would have said that the Army acted stupidly, and invited the couple to the whitehouse to smooth things over over a beer. Either that or, Al and Jesse would have would have been on the scene screaming about racism.
Hey Harley Mike, I have a degree in BA degree in Political bs and still only managed to make it 3 years. When you idiot commanders who are heavily connected up the chain (father and father in law were both ring knocker generals) that is more worried about a vehicle looking good for the unit's next media encounter (newest weapons system on the market attracts a lot of attention) than whether it actually works, the people more interested in getting things done than performing in a dog and pony show tend to get screwed. Four of the five platoon leaders who served under him resigned and got out early.
As for this lesbian couple, sorry ladies but the old school US military are often profoundly religious (Ever hear the phrase "there are no atheists in foxholes"?) and the homosexual lifestyle may be accepted by the higher ups, but it is considered an abomination by the Christian church. There's also the fact that many soldiers in the military didn't want DADT repealed, and while the civilians in charge may have done it for political purposes, a lot service members themselves were against it. Why would anyone expect their wives to simply "Oh gee the Pentagon says they're allowed to be in the military now so we have to accept them"? The Constitution does mention something about freedom of association. The Wive's club is free to associate, OR NOT, with whomever they wish. Any time you have to give a class to the bulk of your employees just to get them to accept a small minority of people who want to work for you, something is wrong.
As for me, I don't care as long as the person does their job. My only problem with it being that I would be concerned that their presence would be a disruption among my other troops. In the artillery, distractions can have fatal consequences for friendly troops.
Open your gay lesbian bisexual and transgender club, what is the problem. By the way the wife is only one not two. Stop whining.
Yeah. Replace the word 'gay' with 'African-American' and say that again. Tell that to the people, white and black, that fought for civil rights in America in the 60's. They're not trying to 'impose their beliefs' on anyone. They want the EQUALITY as announced in the Declaration of Independence and guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States of America.
BTW... the NRA membership is a MINORITY of Americans. Maybe we should treat them like you want to treat the LGBT community.
The members of that "Club" are spouses of American Military Personnel, NOT the Taliban. They should ACT LIKE IT! Either that or STAY THE F^CK OFF THE BASE. MY taxes pay for that base just as much as anyone else's here. Can't play fair. Get Off My Base. THEN you'd be an 'independent' club.
People do not choose their race. People choose their sexual orientation - no matter what the politically correct BS science says. And this kind of crap is why so many are leaving the military. Neither one of those broads are in shape either.
Amanda - We learned alot from the Civil Rights Movement - that force creates force, not cooperation. The tremendous backlash against force caused many decades of resentment instead of an authentic acceptance over time. Many scholars have concluded that 'separate but equal' would have allowed for individuals to achieve much greater success and a more balanced transition. You cannot simply mandate a change in thinking. This country fought a Civil War that proves that point and there are many who believe the war could have been avoided as well. Simply by researching how England and other countries were able to stop slavery without going to war with their own people or suffer the same problems America has is enlightening. It should be noted for clarity, as far as civil rights serving as a foundation for arguments for homosexuality (in lieu of having a foundation built on morality), much disagreement exists within the black community regarding any foundational equivalency of homosexual behavior and civil rights issues regarding race.
I'm confused.. Which one is the spouse? Do they get to receive speical treatment that a straight couple could never get and they both get to be in the club?
How do we know the other girl isn't the spouse?
Really? When did you choose to ignore your attraction to the same sex and only focus on your attraction to the opposite sex? Cause you have to be attracted to both to have something to choose from.
As far as this small minded club goes, they either need to vag up and accept all military spouses equally, or move their fannies off base and pay for all of their own facilities and programs themselves.
They can be as bigoted as they want, they just need to be willing to be personally responsible and pay their own way, and not use government benefits.
It appears they didn't have to offer her any type of membership. According to the article the military does not recognize her as a legitimate spouse. Under current guidelines it appears the club was actually going out of their way to try and include her in recognition of their relationship.
My guess is she didn't want to hang with the filthy heteros.
Hi, Harley Mike,
Thank you for your service, defending the civil justice and rights of all Americans. (Last I checked, only religious organizations are permitted to practice gender-specific bigotry.)
Hey Scuba
Yeah. Replace the word 'gay' with 'African-American' and say that again. Tell that to the people, white and black, that fought for civil rights in America in the 60's. They're not trying to 'impose their beliefs' on anyone. They want the EQUALITY as announced in the Declaration of Independence and guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States of America.
That is right we fought for those rights, I am not going to compare a gay person with a black person. Get your head straight and quit comparing apples or oranges. Blacks have contributed to this society and have earned their respect. Gays have yet to contribute and I will not listen to their demand for respect. They need to EARN IT!
BTW... the NRA membership is a MINORITY of Americans. Maybe we should treat them like you want to treat the LGBT community.
IDIOT stay on subject, WTF does this have to do with this argument. I own no guns.
The members of that "Club" are spouses of American Military Personnel, NOT the Taliban. They should ACT LIKE IT! Either that or STAY THE F^CK OFF THE BASE. MY taxes pay for that base just as much as anyone else's here. Can't play fair. Get Off My Base. THEN you'd be an 'independent' club.
Obviously you never served in the military. Those wives can do what they please, they have that right. They do not own the establishment they hold their meetings. There is no "building" called the spouses club. If there is I have never seen one in the 20 years I served. These women hold their meetings at thier homes, at a convention center on base, at clubs etc. Get a clue. The spouse club is a bunch of wives who get together as a support group within their company, command, unit.
We are so doomed now that we've pussified the armed forces.
zoloft9
you do not know enough about the bible to voice an opinion just like you do not know enough about physics and science. You only have your "philosophy" and even a bum has those.
That would apply if the spouse's club specifically stated they were for heterosexuals only; it does not. It says 'military spouses'. Mrs. Broadway therefore had no reason to suspect she would NOT be welcome when she filed her application to join after marrying her partner.
Now, that being said, I recognize this spouse's club is a private, non-profit organization.
As a private organization, they have the right to exclude whomever they wish. While I personally may find it morally and ethically reprehensible, by law it is their right.
As a nonprofit organization, under the rules of the state in which they are organized, they are allowed to discriminate the basis of sexual gender preference. Nonprofits in the State of North Carolina are required to not discriminate based on gender, color/race, or national origin; however, the laws of NC do NOT ban discrimination based on gender sexual preference.
When the Armed Forces as a whole institutes a Force-wide ban on discrimination based on gender sexual preference, this private, nonprofit spouses' club CAN continue to exclude lesbian and gay spouses; however, they would not be allowed to meet on or use government facilities for meetings--a policy which the Marines, in their infinite wisdom, made abundantly clear earlier this month. I shall look forward to that day when the Armed Forces institutes that policy. It IS coming, it's just a matter of time.
I guess I just don't see how allowing people, whom you will never meet, interact with, or who will never have any impact on your life, to be able to make decisions about what is best for their own life is forcing anything on you. If the proposed changes were to make same sex marriage be the only acceptable marriage, or have it be mandated that everyone must marry someone of the opposite gender, then yes, that would be forcing something onto you (and I would join you in your opposition).
The point isn't to make everyone say that they agree that it's right to be homosexual, or that is preferable, or whether it's something God is against or not. The point is that everyone has the right to live their life the way that they see fit. It's not about taking away your rights, or forcing you to live your life a certain way, rather it's about expanding the rights of others. Family isn't one-size-fits-all. I may not agree with (if I knew all of you personally) all of the choices that everyone posting here has made for themselves, but I support each and every one here's right to make those choices.
Science is science. It is neither politically correct or incorrect. People DO NOT choose their sexual orientation. You religious nuts say that because if your 'god' makes someone that is gay, but it says in your buybull that it's wrong, it's a paradox your brainwashed minds can't comprehend.
And what does being 'in shape' have to do with anything? Have you heard about the fact that over 40% or Americans are obese?
Why are so many people offended by homosexuality? My husband, a decorated, disabled Marine and I fully support the equal rights of same-sex couples. Some of the most true, honest, and real friends we have ever had have been....GAY! Our children will learn that everyone is different and have their owns feelings and choices from birth. We feel sorry for those who express such anger at same-sex couples as clearly they are supressing some issues or other negative feelings.
I express it because I am tired of hearing the whining and wanting more more more. I have seen the changes that heteros have to make to accommodate the gays. Those who dislike gays will not change overnight. Some heteros can accept it overnight but some can't. I am one of those people and one day I will accept them. But not unitl they shut up and show me they can do something other than cry and bitch about stupid things such as this, when there is more important things the military has to worry about!!!!!!
History is writing for winners , they are tho ones that "hold" the truth and have the right to rewrite history,
The tragedy of the civil war was not all about slavery,
Pres. Abraham Lincoln was personally against slavery, but in his first inaugural, he made it clear that placating the Southern states was more important. Quoting himself in other speeches, he said, "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."
The Southern states, especially, preferred a weak federal government with strong and independent state governments. Many Northern states inclined toward a stronger federal government. As years went by, this conflict grew sharper until the Southern states decided they had the right, even the obligation, to protest by leaving the Union. These states felt the federal government was becoming too strong and assuming too many rights
Shipping was a vital part of their economic well-being. Goods and services moved in and out of ports. Some of these ports used were in the Northern states. The federal government, driven by those in the Northern states, sought to pass taxes and tariffs on these goods and services. This seriously hurt the economy of the Southern states. The delegations from Southern states were not about to let members from Northern states railroad through congress taxes and tariffs they felt were oppressive. They also felt their way of life and their states were being particularly targeted since tariffs and taxes were not equally applied to goods and services in Northern states. Imposed tariffs and taxes were factors leading to the Civil war.
The "Defense of Marriage Act"? Why not call it:
The "Defense of Discrimination Act"
The "Defense of What Makes Me Uncomfortable Act"
The "Defense of Arbitrary Selectivity Act"
The "Defense of Homophobia Act"
The "Defense of Religious Dogma Act"
These people fight for freedom around the world, including their local military bases. Seems that our elected representation is far more interested in maintaining their careers than maintaining a standard of freedom for all of us.
"Gays have yet to contribute and I will not listen to their demand for respect." Pretty much sums it up.
"I am sick and tired that these homosexuals want respect and to be treated the same." And I thought that in America "these truths were self-evident". Silly me.
We have many freedoms guaranteed to us in America. Discrimination is not one of them - no matter the desperate rationale.
Eveyone is being duped into accepting "gay" rights in the same category as racism or women's oppression. I find it insulting for african americans and women, and for our society that the media believes we're really not smart enough to notice the fundamental differences.
This article hits the nail on the head!
The Leftist Liberals strike again.... They scream "eqaulity" and want all lesbians and gays to be excepted on every level and demand entry to all things without discrimination. You will get a kick from this; My friend is stationed in D.C. at the Pentagon and his wife, who is a woman, sent a request to the American Military Partner Association there in D.C. This is what she was told:
Dear Mrs. _________, we appreciate your interest in the American Military Partner Association here in Washington D.C., but regret to inform you that your request has been denied. Let me remind you that the American Military Partner Association is established for the partners and spouses of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender servicemembers. Thank you for your interest,
Sincerely;
Stephen Peters
Executive Director
stephen@militarypartners.org
Is that not the pot calling the kettle black or what? We want equality, but discriminate at will!!!!! Open your eyes America. When she went to the media with her letter from them, the media turned a blind eye and said not interested..........That is your American Liberal Soceity who have nothing but harsh words for any Conservatives who don't agree with their own personal agenda.
Yeah, a LOT of projecting going on here:
It's NOT 'apples to oranges' as you so poorly put it. A person is born into a race and with a natural sexual preference. Also, you appear to not have the ability to know whether someone has 'contributed to this society' or not. You don't know what contributions have been made by gays because of the stigma pressed onto them by bigots like you. BTW, you have earned NO RESPECT from me.
Such a projection there little squid. You rant about 'minorities' trying to get their way and you can't make the connection? Can you name another minority that gets their way so much?
Me? Twelve years in places I'd rather forget. Probably saw more action in my twelve than you did in your "twenty" too. Maybe you even gave me a ride to one of my destinations. And the meetings ARE held on base in many commands. No, they do not have their own building. (Wow that was soooo funny) But they DO frequently use base facilities. And if you use the base facilities, you're using my tax dollars. See? I wrote it out for you. You know... like I SPELLED IT OUT FOR YOU.
Grow a pair squid. We fought for ALL Americans. At least I did. You... maybe not so much.
Search for this article:
Homosexual People and the Vindication They Long For (Part 1)
exerpt
"I fear that this great "Land of the Free" is not so free anymore. Because there are terrible consequences to opposing the tide of the homosexual agenda — I have lost the right to disagree. It is considered a hate crime to speak anything against homosexuality, even if it is evangelistic in nature. It is a most stern warning of the signs of the times we live in."
She could accept the offer and in time change their minds make them see how petty the whole thing has been. She would / might be able to change policy and make it easier for the next person. This would require some extra effort on her part which really isn't fair.
I will beg to differ with you on that one.
My belief system has sects for the gays (the Minoan Brotherhood) and the lesbians (the Dianics). If two of our Dianics or two of our Minoans choose to make a commitment to share the Goddess's Gift of Pleasure only with each other, our priests and priestesses can marry them. The government's refusal therefore, to recognize our religious marriages as marriages infringes on our First Amendment rights to practice our religion as we so choose.
And as worship of the Goddess predates Christianity by quite a bit, and Christianity didn't start trying to define marriage until the Bible was codified by the Nicene council in 300 CE, I'd submit your definition of marriage is no more or less valid than ours is.
Now, childish 'one-upmanship' aside, we live in a secular society and the law of this country is separation of Church and State. Imposing the Christian definition of marriage on the entire population is clearly unfair to those of us who are not Christian and violates the non-establishment of religion clause our Founding Fathers wrote into the Constitution. When I took the Oath of Citizenship I swore to uphold and defend the Constitution and this country from all enemies, domestic and foreign and I am sworn to uphold those oaths from both personal and religious convictions.
Blacks fought for the right to marry whoever they wanted. So are gays and lesbians. Blacks fought for the right to be considered equal and be given equal rights. So are gays/lesbians. The civil rights movement did more than guarantee right only to blacks, that guaranteed rights for everyone.
Did you know back in the late 1800's the railroad barons had brought so many Chinese workers over to help build the railroads that people started saying that there were too many Chinese, that if this kept up we'd all end up speaking Chinese and be a Chinese colony,that they were invading and taking jobs and resources away from American citizens? In in reaction to those citizen concerns the Us government banned any further immigration from China, the Chinese already here couldn't marry whites, couldn't own businesses and property, had to live in specially-designated neighborhoods set aside for them. Those law remained on the books until the Civil Rights movement of the 60's, when equality for blacks resulted in equality for all races. This is just another side of the same dice.
Harley Mike, #1.3- What an EXCELLENT! post! I can just feel the "TRUE FREEDOM" you speak of from reading it!
I continue to stand by all previous posts of mine that state: "TRUE EQUALITY IS TO BE FOUND "ONLY" IN DIVERSITY; BY RECOGNIZING AND EMBRACING DIFFERENCES." (just as you've done in your post) Isn't the separation of Church and State just that? a Diversity of 2 "recognized and embraced" differences? "recognized and embraced" for exactly what they each are, which can only be defined in and by "the differences" between them?
Happy Riding!
They don't want to be excepted. They already are. They want to be accepted. Makes the rest of a post more believable when you're not contradicting yourself in the first sentence. /s/
You should really think about this one for a minute JJ. There would not be a reason for the existence of the American Military Partner Association except (see, that's correct usage ;) for the discrimination of the "Wives' Clubs" in the first place. The "rejection" was likely the same they received that forced them to create their own organization.
It's the opposite of "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours" or "do unto others." More like "you did unto us, so now we're doing unto you."
This is not a discrimination issue. What most forget is the ultimate law's and those are of our Creator, he
finds the gay behavior abdominal in his site and so should all those he created, not to pacify them that their life style is expectable and give them permission to do so influencing small children and their lives. The whole issue of so called same sex marriage is disgusting, actually impossible by definition of marriage and it’s purpose. Shame on those who do except and condone you are certainly questions in the eyes of God. Life is mortal, Eternity is forever, how will you spend your Eternity if even your thoughts condone and except these acts of abomination before God.
America has some serious moral issues, encouraged with those in politics only seeking votes not what is proper conduct of human and spiritual value. Why does the once proud America except this insane behavior?
jrsquid-gay people do contribute to society-they have jobs, they pay taxes, do volunteer work-they do everything you and I do. The difference between a gay person and an ethnic minority is that it is impossible to tell just by looking at a person what their sexual orientation is. So if a gay person were to make a major contribution (that would get press coverage, garner a lot of attention, such as donate very generously, organize a large fundraiser for something charitable, coordinate a large volunteer effort, etc), only people who know that him/her personally would know that a gay person made that happen. Conversely, to use your counter example, if an African American person were to make the same contribution, everyone would be able to see without having to know that him/her personally what their race is.
Why the pro GLBT group collapse comments from the ones that disagree. Why you have to force your believe or way of life to others. You want everybody be tolerant to your way of life imposing your will.
Oy.
Gays work, live, pay taxes. They certainly do contribute. And they aren't 'demanding respect'; they are insisting that the 'equality for all' laws of this country be applied fairly and equally to them as well, as they too are part of the 'all'.
Laws passed in this country should apply to EVERYONE fairly and equally.
I have yet to meet a gay person, or any person, that automatically gets my respect. That means these two women and the group they represent.
ScubaJim
you are a liar and a fake. I can tell by the way you write. I do not ride boats. You on the other hand are a quitter and been discharged for some OTH reasons. You have a hate for the military and any other establishment. Nobody does twelve years or half way through a career and just get out and then turns around and proudly claims to have fought for our country. You are a disgrace and quit acting like you where a Marine. Those guys will give you a blanket party for being the kind of guy you are. If you served you served against the grain. Obviously you where part of the old crew who saw no wars/combat. I did the math you faker. I on the other hand have been to Bosnia, Horn of Africa, Iraq and Afghanistan.
Here is really the bottom line: It is a Military Spouses Club. She is not legally a spouse.
FYI, unmarrried, shacked-up, baby mamas cannot join either.
Obviously it's another slow news day for the sensationalistic mainstream media.
Whenever it's slow they drag out the pedestrian GLBT nonsense to force on everyone.
It's tiring listening to the incessant whining and complaining of these "special interest" groups.
In related news, I changed the blade in my razor this morning.
JJ101:
The American Military Partner Association is for PARTNERS of military serving members. Your friend's wife is a 'SPOUSE' therefore membership to an organization for 'Partners' is not open to her since she is not a 'Partner'.
Um.
If a cop pulls you over are you going to say "F***off?" or are you going to say "Can I help you Officer?" That's automatic respect.
You state that you served in the military. When you transferred to a new post, new unit, did you refuse to listen the new commanding officer until they 'earned' your respect, or do you automatically say 'yes, sir? when they address you? That's automatic respect.
If you see a woman wearing a nice dress on the street, do you immediately walk up to her and feel her up, or do you compliment her on her dress politely? That's automatic respect.
When you call customer service because you have a problem with something you own, do you immediately start cursing on the phone or do you start with "Hi, good morning, I'm having a problem with..." That's automatic respect.
All I can say is that it's a good thing this military member's wonderful spouse is taking care of this nonsense during the stress of pregnancy rather than during the stress of a deployment. I mean, gosh knows there's nothing more important than acceptance in the wives' club.
I'd divorce her.
And by the way, this is precisely why I could never be a lesbian. I HATE women. Nags and drama queens, every single one of us.
They closed their Facebook accounts, etc? Really? Who knew the Marine Corps was so full of cowards?
And, jrsquid, try not to be so judgmental. There are so many wonderful people in this world who just, coincidentally, happen to be gay. You probably encounter them every day and don't even realize it. "Gay" is not a disease and it does not define a person. It is just one facet of the whole diamond. Who a person is is something in the basic character of a human being - like kindness, compassion, forgiveness, generosity, honor, integrity. THOSE are the things that really count in a person, not who they sleep with at night!
"They need to contribute"? They need to earn respect? How, exactly, would you suggest they do that? By, maybe, enlisting in the military? Putting their lives on the line for everyone else? (even you, squidly) Making it their lifework? Rising to the rank of Lt. Col.? Is that the kind of thing you had in mind? Or is it just the "gay thing" that you want them to divest themselves of in order to "earn respect"?
Sexual lifestyle is not a right, marriage is not a right, and she is not a spouse by federal law. Those are facts. Why is this story been running for months? Acceptance of the acts of homosexuality? It is now taught in school as acceptable for many years. Which in my opinion has contributed in a rise of insecure individuals unsure and delusional concerning their identity.
Amanda
that is what you may do. I have yet to respect the person. I can respect the uniform and what it represents and the rank of a military officer. I do not have to respect the person. YOU DEFINITELY OBVIOUSLY never served.
And yes occasionally I do choose who I automatically respect out of ulterior motives... who doesn't? I usually forget those peoples faces.
Wordsmith yes I am judgemental and it may take me a while to fully accept gays, like I have stated. Right now I hate gays.
Think about the fact that there are gay pride groups, black pride groups, Hispanic pride groups but if someone starts a white or heterosexual pride group they are deemed to be evil raciest and hate mongers. Why is it ok for someone to be proud to be black or gay or Hispanic but not ok to be proud to be white or straight? Just more evidence of how all of this politically correct bs is just reverse discrimination.
Wordsmith. How about quit bitching for starters. I know they are great athletes, good soldiers etc and I know hollywood put them in a bad light and youth TV does not do them justice and reality shows makes it worse. That is the bad side of trying to fit in. I do not agree with this ARTICLE and I thnk that a compromise was in the works and the gays decided that they did not want to accept it until they see it according to the gays perspective. No way i am going to accept that and respect that decision.
Actually, in the version of the Bible that I have it says 'Thou shalt not lie with a man as with a woman, it is a detestable thing." It's not 'abdominal', and since my Bible was printed in 1961, only in later versions has the Church officially changed it to 'abomination'.
Oh, and since neither God nor Jesus ever said anything about women lying down together, God must have a double standard.
Whose God? Yours might, mine doesn't.
And your God says 'Judge not, lest ye also be judged.' I was under the impression that you Christians believe He makes the Final Judgement in heaven.
I was also under the impression that you Christians believe God has a purpose for everything and everyone and that he doesn't make mistakes. Therefore, gays and lesbians are a part of His plan, too. Who are you to decide that God's plan is faulty? Are you not, by judging his creations, therefore judging God?
ScubaGolfJim---What do you see in this story that allows you to attack others in such a way? Do you believe everything it says without question? or do you know it is nothing more than a propaganda piece put up by the group this woman is director of? As the director of the group who wrote this article it is more like interviewing the bank robber and believing his story of innocence based purely on his side. The group she belongs to not only proposes to educate the masses through media and news stories, they are the same group who nominated her for spouse of the year as they run the event. This story and the hype around it are run by an organization who only allows gay members. Funny they would attack a organization who would only allow straights for discrimination. So this whole thing is about getting even or revenge or re-education of the worst kind. It is not about equality it is to prove a point nothing more. This story has gotten more time on msnbc than the war in Afghanistan this year. Kind of proves my point.
After reading this article, I, a retired senior non-commissioned officer, feel compelled to say:
(1) I'm glad I'm retired
(2) I'm glad I live in Washington State :)-
Little Squid,
You make me laugh more than my dogs make me laugh! I'll give you two examples: President Carter renounced his affiliation with the Southern Baptists owing to their gender-based discrimination; and show me a female Priest.
Have a nice day.
What part of EQUALITY do you dumb Christian hicks not understand?
I have not served, no. My dad was a Vietnam and Korean war vet, but I have not served. I wanted to at one point but am ineligible.
And here you contradict your first point:
I have yet to meet a gay person, or any person, that automatically gets my respect.
I offer respect to everyone I have contact with (both in everyday life and here on the Vine) until they prove unworthy of it. Even if I don't agree with them, their viewpoint, or what they've done, they are still human and have their own reasons for behaving as they do.
Amanda everyone judges everyone has faults no one is without sin and and no one is righteous. Christians have no right to judge. I KNOW I AM being judgemental and I know I am wrong, BUT so are the gays. Two wrongs do not make a right, but since this blogs does nothing but vent peoples views. I find it harmless. I wil not lose sleep.
Ulterior motives like getting a girl or getting a job. Do you respect that officer that gave you a ticket. Do you remember his name? Do you remember anyone who you respected out of motive? Be truthful you probably do not even respect your boss but act like you do. I respect people in a flash second such as a MOH who I see, because I know what he had to do to get the MOH.
Amanda-2017567--- I think you are confusing good manners with respect, respect is given or offered as a form of recognition or gratitude. By the way common in the military-even if you do not respect the person you always respect the rank. You do not salute the officer you salute the rank there in lies the prestige, tradition, and values. It also reflects on the person wearing it as attainment and sacrifice to have achieved it. But I can tell you from experience there are a variance in the types of people who are wearing the rank not all good and not all bad.
Amanda. I have yet to meet a gay person who automatically gets my respect. (yet)
jrsquid, I can honestly say I have no respect for you, OR the service you did. I am embarassed that you ever represented the U.S. military.
trust
What part of Equality DO YOU NOT GET hahahahaahaha obviously you are gay and do not believe in hicks or the church.
Cult,
That is good. See anyone can disrespect, good boy, you proved my point. See what happens when you bitch too much. Just as I have been doing. It breeds people like Cult of Personality and myself. So Gays quit bitching!!!!
Harley Mike
Of course not, what would give the Feds jurisdiction over such a matter? Aside from that, the Hells Angels is a private organization and as such should be allowed to set any membership rules they choose. The military is a function of the government and there should be no discrimination against US citizens of any sort in any branch or extension of government at any level.
Back country read above and get caught up. You are beating a dead horse. The spouses club is not affiliated with the military. It is formed by the spouses of service members. They meet wherever and have a support group or just a readiness group gathering.
Has the "gay" gene been discovered yet, cause the last time I checked ethnicity was biological, unlike homosexuality which is ideological. I kinda tired of the fallacious comparison between the two. The worst mistake the club made was assuming this was about joining the club. This is about making a statement to normalize homosexuality. They should have stuck to their guns and been like "We'll think about it when you pass, height, weight, and possibly the PT test."
the wordsmith, #1.54- GREAT! point! " "Gay".....does not define a person." So, too, should it also NOT UNDEFINE a "Non-Gay"?
RESPECT isn't earned, it's GIVEN (or not) and that is where the responsibility for RESPECT begins, i.e., we have an 81% DISAPPROVED OF CONGRESS, because RESPECT for and to The American People IS NOT BEING "GIVEN". If it were, it would be reflected back to The Congress.
There's another story about a Woman who was attacked and thrown off a Subway Platform and the very first comment on the first thread that follows SUMS IT UP so well! And there was an horrendous story about all these shootings that occurred in Oakland the other day and a call for help from The Oakland Police to the Public about "the Thugs" that were probably behind it. The Oakland Police SHOWED NO RESPECT for the Public by planned "AMBUSHING" of a vulnerable Occupy Camp at 3:00AM. Now they wish and NEED to be GIVEN the Public's Respect? YOU GET WHAT YOU CREATE.....RESPECT or otherwise.
This story seems like "She respectfully asked", They respectfully answered" and now "She respectfully declines". It was "new territory" to the Club just as much as it was "new territory" to the Seeker and I'm happy to see that the Media has followed up with the outcome since it was last reported. I'M NOT HAPPY TO SEE THAT ANOTHER WHOLE THREAD IS COLLAPSED, THOUGH!
Betty Garrity
Your post sure did make me laugh.
"....and give them permission to do so influencing small children and their lives."
Like your priests pile driving young boys in the back of the church, hypocrites.
"Shame on those who do except and condone you are certainly questions in the eyes of God."
I think you mean accept. Anyway, doesn't your "god" tell you that only he can judge you, no one else. Yet here you are judging these people because of their lifestyle.
"What most forget is the ultimate law's and those are of our Creator,"
I don't believe in your creator so her "law's" don't apply to me. Look, I lead a good life, I treat people the way I want to be treated. I treat all people the same and believe I am good natured and a good person. I don't need a book to tell me how to act and I don't need a book to tell me how to treat other people. If two men want to marry or two women want to marry then go for it. WHO CARES, it does NOT affect your life in any way, shape or form. Your book says to love thy neighbor, hate the sin but love the sinner, judge not lest thee be judged thy self(something like that) yet you do none of this.
You don't have to agree with their lifestyle, but who are you to tell them they can't do that. As your book says "god" will judge them so don't worry about it, just worry about yourself.
But jrsquid, respect has nothing to do with this situation. It's about equality. Something the military has been fighting for since its establishment. When we soldiers fight, we do so for every man, women, and child that call themselves American regardless of sexual orientation. I may not have respect for everyone I fight for, but I still believe in equality. You seem to have forgotten that. You, sir, are no soldier.
Lieutenant Scrounge;
Let me say, Thank you for your service and welcome home Sir,Your post is very spot on when it comes to the reality that John and Jane Citizen Never see, and the thing of serving almost 40 yrs ago we had a couple of "Gays" in our unit, and and back then "Gays" were dealt with harshly, i.e. midnight blanket parties, cars being trashed, etc. but "Dr. J" and "Gallegos" never let on, and it was only discovered by accident. Now imagine if you will, the feelings of a bunch of "Macho Redneck" boys back then, we knew"What we should do" but these men had become a part of "US", we realized that these two would lay down their lives for the "team" and never think twice and we came to realize that we would do the same. It was a time of a lot of inner turmoil. They never DEMANDED anything, they were always soldiers first, the life they led was secretive and cautious. As I see it those men changed the outlook for 11 other men on our team and as I see it they did MORE for "GAY" rights than 10,000 "Flamers" marching in the streets of San Francisco.
Change has always come slowly and forced change is not good, it only creates martyrs on one side of the topic and trouble makers on the other. I am being honest when I say I do not approve of the "GAY" lifestyle, but it does not mean that I am or will be a green eyed, hairy monster with 6 inch fangs dripping blood in your quest for acceptance. Only that the heritage and culture I have come from sees it as an abomination, but because of those two men that to this day I would still willingly lay down my life for as well as the other 10 men that got to know them.
Mr. Zoloft;
You are welcome sir, and tho' I am a christian by choice I don't try to force it on anybody and if I am asked if I am I readily admit it, and will start to witness but, if the person starts to steer the conversation away from it or say they don't believe, that is their right. I would rather let my actions in life be an example of what I profess to believe rather than stand on a soap box on a street corner at rush hour. And besides Grandma always said "Christians aren't perfect' only forgiven."
Mr. JJ101;
Thanks for the little tid bit of info about the true double standard we sometimes have to live by. It reminds me of Grandpa's favorite saying when I caught him having a cigarette after his 3rd heart attack "Do as I say, not as I do". When the week before he caught my buddy and I walking down the street having a smoke on the way home from school.
Sandi & Alim, WOW you both have away of saying whats on your minds and you don't sugar coat it do you? Points well taken and understood, even if it sounds like frustation underneath your words.
Mystery Rhee;
Thank you for your kind words, tho' I ask you to look at my profile and some of my previous posts to get a fuller picture of me and you may or may not be so giving of those kind salutations. But I have enjoyed your previous posts on other threads and thank you for trying to stay balanced and open minded even if you are a little "left" of me. Shalom
Mr. ScubaGolfJim;
Thank you for your service and help to protect our right to be sitting here agreeing to disagree. I am at the other end of the spectrum from you and I can almost feel your frustration, but sir, we will not convert the world to see things our way overnite but thru sensible point/counter point talks and conversations we can soften others out-looks.
Actually yes I do. Coming from one of the worst neighborhoods in our municipality to a net worth now of over a million, and being, despite the dictates of his church, willing to accept an openly-practicing pagan in his front office and quietly ignoring the crystal on my desk masquerading as a paperweight.
I respect him to the point where I give my effort to the job and do whatever I can to hep the company move forward irregardless of whether that is in my job description or whether I get paid commensurate to what I do. I'm a biometrics technician, janitor, technical writer and certified EVSE installer on a receptionist salary. I also co-write my boss's books and do the research for them, accompany him to speaking engagements and conferences with Senators and Congressmen, and I see the respect he gets from those who esteem his words and actions highly without ever having met him themselves.
And if your dislike of gays is so apparently evident, how many of the people you know would volunteer such information? I'm guessing you know many people without knowing what sexual preference they harbor. How do you know one of them is NOT gay? Do you ask everyone you know and/or are friends with if they are gay?
betty: What is ..."proper conduct of human and spiritual value." Do you know?
Insisting you get respect when you live in a questionable manner is insulting to the rest of society, she rejected a invitation to be a special guest because she thought it was demeaning, what does she think sharing a vibrator with another woman is ? now she wants to infect another element os society, her lifestyle to every moral person is demeaning, degrading, perverted un Godly anti human, and everything people have been taught for thousands of years in most minds, you can't change that overnight with a couple of executive actions, we were better off not even approaching this gay thing at all, it will come back and bite you in the behind, you can not legislate normal, and even if you do and you give the people a false sense of normal it will come with a price tag and it will be a faux normal, there are two kinds of normal represented in two pieces of fruit one piece is fresh and in good condition normal for its bushel, the other is rotten and mushy normal for its bushel, which bushel do youwant to be a part of, or should we just mix the two together? these people in time will have you all on witch hunts to remove all the oppositions of evil, evil is disguising its self as good, just ignoreit don't feed it. the media feeds it because its the medias baby. notice how it never ends. now I am not saying that all Gay people are bad people far from it some very good people out their, but there is something not right about some of the things that they do, now if God or the ancient what ever you want to call them says the act is a abomination then it must be, therefore avoid the act, just as you would avoid murder, rape, or anything that has been labeled with a mister yuck sticker. now go ahead Liberals don't allow free speech or free thought collapse this before someone can read it.
James-3217672, #1.57- EXCELLENT!!! GREAT!points made!
ItIsWhat!t!s, #1.73- Very interesting and seemingly valid point that you make there. I've never heard Anyone make the argument between Biology and Ideology like that.
Mr. BackCountry;
Sir, please re-read that post at a slower pace, I meant it as a euphemistic expression. Everybody has been comparing apples to oranges and going point/counter-point over states law vs DOMA, social vs societal, religious vs hedonistic etc., for almost the last two weeks with this story and in my first line you will see I am thinking ''WE" have beat this horse to death from both sides of the aisle henceforth, me, just throwing out the line was just for showing the absurdity as I have come to see this dog and pony show where it is only galvanizing peoples attitudes. I am fully aware of the legal aspects of such a case (of me suing to join the H-A), but I thought you would (and most people) would see the no-win situation we are truly facing at this point with this "LEADER".
When I was in, I had a damn good Captain turn in his papers and I asked him why he was leaving and I thought his answer of "To become a Major or higher you have to have a Lobotomy." was a joke but now seeing this Lieutenant Colonel in action I am starting to believe it.
Harley Mike, #1.77- OF THE MOMENT! (and that is why I go to all the trouble of specifically copying name and post# before speaking!) LLLLLMMMMMAAAAOOOOO!!!!!!!!
You aren't sayin' you're a "Flip-Flopper", are you?
JrSquid (I assume you are quite young, the immaturiuty shows)
You said you have seen nothing contributed by gays to society.
A ludicrous claim.
I will give you a few exmples though I could give you a hundred thousand or so:
Computers--Ever hear of Alan Turning, his work breaking the enigma code in WW2 had a lot to do with winning that war and directly lead to the computer you are using right now. He is known as the Father of Computing.
Cole Porter--Revolutionized Popular Music and you will be hard put to find a musician who would not give him great credit. It would be extremely easy to list thousands of others in performing arts as well from theater, to movies, to music and dance. Then again I doubt you know much about culture.
Fashion--Yes the clothes you wear. An insdustry filled with highly creative people of which most of the major dewigners are gay. Calvin Klein, Perry Ellis, Halston, Galliano, and so many more. Of course you think that poly-blend KMart shirt you wear has nothing to do with that...though it is likely a knock off of their designs from a few years ago.
Alexander Hamilton--the man who set up the American Banking and economic system, 1st Sec of the Treasury. Yes he was married (so were Liberace, Eltoin John and Peter Allen) but his real lover was John Laurens of SC.
Speaking of Alexanders--Alexander the Great--Maybe you have heard of him? Did a sting in the military a long time ago. Conquered much of the known world at the time?
I couod go on, but your only respoonse will be to comment on whether I have ever been in the Military. Grow up.
No,it was about joining the club. Spouse's clubs organize fundraisers, drives to make care packages for soldiers overseas, and participate in other morale-raising support activities. She wanted to be part of that, to support her spouse materially when that spouse was not physically present.
As Mrs. Broadway is not an active member of the military, there is no reason for her to have to conform to the requirements and tests for an active-duty serving member.
Whew, sometimes when I read comments posted it depresses me. Many demonstrate how little we have advanced as a species. Hatred, fear, intolerance still reign throughout humanity. Good lord people, are you ever going to get past this crap and learn to live and let live. Live your life the way you chose, and stop hating those who claim the same right - to live their life the way they chose. When you are about to take your last breath, and (hopefully) you get a chance to gauge the sum total of your life, will you look back with regret because you lived a life filled with hate and fear. I can't think of anything worse. You don't get a chance to go back and fix these things. The time to do it is now. When you renounce hate, and forsake fear, it's like a 1000 lb weight is lifted off your shoulders, and by the way, the world instantly becomes a better place.
I'm just sayin'
Nope, not gay, sorry to burst your fantasy. But unlike some people who call themselves Americans, I do have respect for people who do not share my views, like non-smokers and dumb Chirstian hicks who push their views onto me. I believe a gay person has just as much right to do what they want as I do.
As I put in a previous post, these ladies should start their own spouses club, one that is open to all spouses. Which would you rather be tied too, one that supports equality, or one that is homophobic, and probably racist. I mean if you can hate gays, why not hate colored people too? Is that YOUR type of equality?
Which one is the wife ?
I thought the club was private. My home is too, but I don't have to let anyone in, especially some pervert.
Oh, so you're a psychic now? Remember, not many can put in 20 and come out an E3, which is a generous assumption based on your writing. So, just where is your "proof" that I'm "a liar and a fake?" Your pathetic 'attempts' below will be taken on one at a time.
Well since you listed 'squid' in your moniker, what did you do? Huh? Since you didn't 'ride boats,' did you perchance ride ships? See? A 'boat' is a submarine, while a 'ship' is, well, a ship.
Ah, another meaningless and unfounded ridiculous rant. Because I have struck a homophobic nerve of yours you try continue to try to insult me and claim to 'know' that I didn't serve my country in the military. There are MANY reasons people leave the military. Someone that 'served' would know that.
Was 'forced religion' the reason I resigned? Again, not the only reason. Was it the surgery required to rebuild the ligaments and tendons in my knee? No. That was not the only reason either. Maybe the specialists disqualifications after the 'less than 60%" rehab success? Nope. That wasn't the only reason either. Neither was any of the myriad other aspects that had to be considered. As stated before: they all add up. But for you to accuse me of less than honorable service is about as ignorant of a statement anyone could make. If you did serve, you are an embarrassment to the rest of us.
Au contraire. I apparently respect the military much more than you do. I'm more accepting of different people in the military than you. And "any other establishment?" My how you expose your true bigotry and hatefulness more and more with each post.
Wow! Nobody? Ever? So you 'know' every single member of the military? You 'know' what each and every person who has ever served has experienced? See? Unintelligent babble is exactly that. Unintelligent babble. And you just keep on and on spouting it out.
If I'm a 'disgrace' in your eyes, no big deal. You have proven time and again how lacking you are in the IQ field. BTW, it's 'were' in this case, not 'where.' Well, I guess. But with your rants, who knows? Another example: I never 'acted' like I was a Marine. Really, Marines aren't the only ones that hitch rides on Navy ships or boats.
OOooohhh. You watched Full Metal Jacket, huh? And what kind of "guy" is that? Your fantasy version? Dream On.
LOL!! And how did you 'do the math' with NO NUMBERS? Tell me squid. When did I enlist? When did I resign? You have no clue, but you 'did the math.' You just keep on and on shooting yourself in the foot with your illogical, incoherent, and unintelligent rants.
Been there. Done that. And more. If you really did put in an honorable 20, good for you. But you show more and more how unlikely that is to be true with each one of your desperate posts.
BOO-HOO-HOO
It won't be too many years till gays will OWN the military thru their constant whining.
Hell in a rainbow adorned handbasket.
I don't blame her for refusing. There doesn't appear to be anything "special" about her.
I could care less about the gay issue. What I do care about is why the Army is allowing this obviously very obese woman to stay that way. I'm so sick of this "new normal" crap that is being force fed to us. Being that fat is far from normal, and in the Army it should not be allowed, you either stay in some sort of shape or your shown the door. She's an officer for Gods sake, what kind of example does she set looking like a refrigerator.
She could probably take you out JCB.
She couldn't run 200 yards without having a heart-attack Jooby, much less swim a 100 yards without sinking. She's huge.
and, if she is considered a "role model" as an officer in this countries military this country is in very big trouble.
The LT Col. is pregnant in that picture. Last I saw, the Army says its okay for a woman to be pregnant in the military. She will need to lose weight and get back into shape after her maternity leave.
Mrs. Broadway, the subject of the article, is under no compunction to conform to Army standards as she is not active-serving military.
JCB -- very good point --- Jooby -- anyone can "take someone out" with a weapon --- theses are morbidly obese "Officers" in the armed forces --- pretty sad example what we claim to be "Our country's finest". Fat, gay women ... no wonder the world laughs at us.
But again --- this is probably allowed because they fall into several "protected" species and that makes the rules for normal people unenforceable ...
So JCB your whole bitch is they way she looks? How juvenile. Maybe you should look at some of the men in the armed service while your at it.
The Leftist Liberals strike again.... They scream "eqaulity" and want all lesbians and gays to be accepted on every level and demand entry to all things without discrimination. You will get a kick from this; My friend is stationed in D.C. at the Pentagon and his wife, who is a woman, sent a request to the American Military Partner Association there in D.C. This is what she was told:
Dear Mrs. _________, we appreciate your interest in the American Military Partner Association here in Washington D.C., but regret to inform you that your request has been denied. Let me remind you that the American Military Partner Association is established for the partners and spouses of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender servicemembers. Thank you for your interest,
Sincerely;
Stephen Peters
Executive Director
stephen@militarypartners.org
Is that not the pot calling the kettle black or what? We want equality, but discriminate at will!!!!! Open your eyes America. When she went to the media with her letter from them, the media turned a blind eye and said not interested..........That is your American Liberal Soceity who have nothing but harsh words for any Conservatives who don't agree with their own personal agenda.
And for those that say it is a "partnership orginization", look at their website, it says for partners and spouses. That is what is wrong with this world, they all scream that their rights are being infringed, but have no concerns in taking away other peoples rights. Stand Up America!!!!! We are suppose to be forced to listen to their cries for rights, but when they kick our rights to the wayside, we are seen as racist and biggots....
The truly 'pathetic' thing about msnbc (lowercase intentional) is that they foster an environment of discrimination on these stories, against ANYONE who DARES speak out against ANYTHING SODOMITE. Well, the Constitution gives me the EXACT same right to voice my own opinion. It also gives me freedom of religion as well. As a true, Born Again, Christian, I LOATHE the SODOMITE lifestyle. I love the people, but LOATHE the way they live. Why?. Because my Master Jesus Christ did as well, and I try to live EXACTLY the way He did. I REFUSE to sit back and allow the SODOMITES and pro-SODOMITE agenda crowd to be the only voice heard. Now let's see how long it takes msnbc's 'community' to collapse these comments. The truly funny thing about that is, collapsed comments actually get looked at even more than those that arent :) May Jesus Christ guide you to the TRUTH, of the "law" that matters MOST to me, and should to all of you as well, above ALL others...the King James Version Bible's Law.!!!
Spoken like a fat person Steve. It's not how she "looks" Steve, it's how overweight she is. And I feel the same way about obese male officers. I think it is totally pathetic that we have no "standards" concerning the "fitness" of our military's officers. These obese slobs are not worthy of being an officer if they can't control their obvious addiction to food, no one has the "right" to be in the military, it is a privilege to serve, and your fitness has EVERYTHING to do with your service. Sorry but your argument is absurd.
I dont think they have caught on to the fact that their goofing on those women with the spouse award..
You have absolutely no idea when that picture was taken Amanda. That picture could very well be several years old, not new at all. If you look at the picture closely, having lived in DC for years, that is late September based on the leaf color of the trees, there are NO leaves on those trees this time of year, so your point is invalid. And she's way to heavy even 5 months ago if she was pregnant when that picture was taken.
Pregnancy does not normally make a woman gain 200 lbs.
If the gay lifestyle is so natural I suppose she was impregnated by her "spouse."
Navy MCPO (ret)
i love arguments like yours:
because it obviously applies to heterosexual couples where one or both parties are infertile :)
so obviously their lifestyle isn't natural either, heterosexual infertile couples aren't natural - right ?
i adore arguments like yours :)
Taxpayers fund 100% of the military. The Pentagon sucks up nearly 70% of the federal budget. Unless all the bigots want to give every gay and lesbian person in the U.S. a pass on paying federal taxes every year, all citizens ought enjoy the same equal rights, including employees of the DoD - who also pay taxes. It is contrary to both the law and common sense to have any policy that forces individuals to pay taxes to a govt. agency that then makes them discriminate against themselves, for no reason other than that they are not in the majority. That is the definition of tyranny by the majority, a principle this nation not only professes to find unjust and ethically repugnant but also attempts to enforce on other nations around the world. Hypocrisy is not unlawful, but more theocrats in the military and govt. are fast realizing its core existence is the basis for prejudice. Those in the majority only make themselves appear small and powerless, if not also cowardly, when resorting to group discrimination to prevail on an issue that is (a) none of their business and (b) does no harm to anyone and would benefit all.
JJ101:
The American Military Partner Association is for PARTNERS of military serving members. Your friend's wife is a 'SPOUSE' therefore membership to an organization for 'Partners' is not open to her since she is not a 'Partner'.
Exactly, so how do YOU know that the Lt. Col. is NOT presently conforming to regulations as regards height, weight and PT requirements?
Its possible that they don't care one way or the other about the club, or even want to be a member, what cooks their cookie is that they were treated differently because they are different and that is not acceptable to treat someone different just because they are.
now where are my rights as a straight person to not be bothered with thousands of gay issues in every aspect of my life, why do we have to have gay this and gay that rammed down our throats every min of every day and in every aspect from religion to Boy Scouts and now some Army wives club, in our schools, to me their presence is like the flu it really makes me sick to my stomach, and its begenning to resemble a infestation they are everywhere, now for 35years that they have been basically out of the closet its been like a down hill snowball, and now it is becoming threatening, the only reason she wants into the club is because they don't want her and that to her is not tolerable, so in essence the club is being bullied by a dike, yes bullied like the gay community has been bullying the rest of us for the past decade. they bully our churches, they bully the boy scouts, they bully everything that wont bend their way, they are bullies. that's what T Roosevelt said about them Bully! Bully! Bully! there is nothing worse than the gay community ganging up on everyone else and bulling them. where are the rights of these organizations to establish their own rules and run their own clubs without some form of invasion. even if she got them to change she would be more unwelcome then she was before, now all you meanies stop bulling the straight people, and all you liberals time for your En4m@. Liberal bulling of everyone not in their collective mind set is getting pretty bad to, who would have thought that 40 years of brainwashing could cause so much degradation to a society. and make it to where a society would want to throw out everything that 237years of hard work and sacrifice built, and replace it with political correctness and massive controls, freedom be damned. where are we headed? I believe in live and let live but I also believe that its a two way street. why is it that 3% of the population can hold the rest of the country prisioner to its demands. why is it that 3% of the population can force 97% to go in the direction they demand you go? America is fading away, and when its gone and you all live substandard lives in every respect the people that brought you to that point will teach you that things are better when they are not and you will believe them because you won't know any better. we don't need the change we are getting, its change for the worse not better. its never ending BS and more rules with more controls, and no freedom of thought. they are already manipulating speech with their Politically correct crap, crap would be the politically correct way to describe it, if it smells like crap then it must be crap.
It is supposed to give ALL people the freedom of religion, but it doesn't.
My belief system has sects for the gays (the Minoan Brotherhood) and the lesbians (the Dianics). If two of our Dianics or two of our Minoans choose to make a commitment to share the Goddess's Gift of Pleasure only with each other, our priests and priestesses can marry them. The government's refusal therefore, to recognize our religious marriages as marriages infringes on our First Amendment rights to practice our religion as we so choose.
In the copy of the Bible I have, printed in 1961, the Old Testament says God says 'Thou shalt not lie with a man as with woman, it is a detestable thing.' Somewhere between 1961 and now, the word was changed to 'abomination'. Oh, and nowhere does it say anything about women lying with women, so I guess God has a double standard.
Jesus doesn't say anything against homosexuality, at least not in the version of the Bible I have. The New Testament verses that deal with the subject are from letters written by apostles, not disciples--the disciples heard Jesus's words from his own lips but the apostles heard it later secondhand or thirdhand and therefore given how words can be misinterpreted and misunderstood, those latter epistles can't be trusted:
A novice was starting out in the monastery for the first day and the head monk gave him a handwritten copy of the monastery rules for him to copy out.
The novice asked 'Is this an exact copy of the original?" The head monk said 'yes' but he got to thinking.
Some time later the novice found the head monk in the archives sitting on the floor crying. He rushed over to the old monk thinking something was wrong, but the old monk just pointed to the page of a dusty old book sitting in front of him."The word is not 'celibate', it's 'celebrate'!"
Around 329 CE a handful of Christian elders got together all 8000 scrolls of Christian teachings that existed at the time, picked out what they liked and put it together in a book called the Bible. Whatever they didn't like was labeled 'the Forbidden Books' and hidden away, and are currently said to be gathering dust in the Vatican archives somewhere.Until we see the old scrolls and verify what is in them, you cannot be absolutely sure that what is in the Bible IS what has ALWAYS been in the Bible.
Mmm. So why are you on the computer? A home, etc? Did you, as Jesus said, 'Give all you have to the poor and follow me'? Are you married? (the church's official position is that Jesus was never married.) if you ARE married, do you make your wife cover her head, as it states in Corinthians 1? I can almost guarantee that if you did she'd divorce you in a heartbeat.
For all you complaining about the LT COL's weight please justify the appearance of GEN Schwarzkopf. He also appeared to be obese and one would assume unable to pass his physical. But he sure did the job he needed to do at the time. Take a look at all the linemen in the NFL almost all wualify as obese - any of you macho men want to get into a fight with them.
JJ 101,
Conveniently, you hide behind anonymity. The "email" from your friend is false. Anyone is free to see the facts by going to AMPA's page for membership (militarypartners.org/join) and noting that ally (AKA heterosexual ) spouses are welcome.
--FROM THEIR "JOIN" PAGE--
Your Status (check all that apply): *
Civilian Partner/Spouse of an LGBT Servicemember
Active Duty Partner/Spouse of an LGBT Servicemember
Active Duty, Nat'l Guard, Reserve LGBT Servicemember
Civilian Partner/Spouse of an LGBT Veteran
Prior Service or Retired LGBT Veteran
Civilian Partner/Spouse of a Non-LGBT Servicemember (ally)
Civilian Partner/Spouse of a Non-LGBT Veteran (ally)
Active Duty, Nat'l Guard, or Reserve Non-LGBT Servicemember (ally)
Prior Service or Retired Non-LGBT Veteran (ally)
Non-Military/Veteran Civilian Ally
---
If you're going to lie - make sure you do so in a way that you won't be caught so easily.
Not to bright are you Amanda? That photo was submitted to MSN by Ashley Broadway the Lt. Col.'s partner, it says so right below the picture. If the Lt. Col. were "the picture of health, and the in shape person" you seem to want to convey, then why submit a photo that makes you both look like refrigerators in a picture that will be on a national thread? My guess is your heavy also.
There is no justification Holly, he's an obese person, who should have been told "either get into some relative shape" or your going to be retired. And he wasn't much of a General in my book, his ideas were pathetic, his decisions defied reality.
While i might agree the Lt. Col. should spend more time on the obstacle course and less time at Old Country Buffett.This kind of treatment is unacceptable. They knew she wouldn't accept the offer. I understand and sympathize why she refused, i get it. It was insulting. Equal rights do not come easy. It doesn't matter if your black and being told to sit in the back of the bus or a member of the homosexual element trying to join a club. She would have been more effective accepting the offer and changing things from the inside.
Who knows why she submitted that picture? Maybe it was the only one she had on hand? Maybe the only one she could find? If someone said they had to have a picture of me right now the only one I would be able to give them is one that was taken after I had facial reconstructive surgery after a bicycle accident four years ago. I try to avoid pictures now and have nothing recent--and even before the accident I rarely posed for pictures.
Not once did I ever say 'she's the picture of health and in shape'. As you pointed out, the picture is not current. While I cannot say that she DOES NOT look like that currently, neither can you say that she DOES look like that.
Way to go on the deflection, but here, I'm going to go on this little side trip with you.
I was 97 when I got pregnant with my 1st child. I lost 10 pounds in my first trimester to morning sickness, dropped to 87 pounds, then was at 151 When I gave birth to my oldest son. At my three month checkup I found I was pregnant again and I was at 140. By the time I had my second son, I was at 175. My doctor told me to bring the weight down gradually and he wanted to see me at 140 for a couple months then drop gradually to 120 since he said 97 was too skinny for a 5 foot two Asian female.
I am currently at 130. I ride my bicycle, walk,or ride the bus everywhere I go; I volunteer at the local animal shelter and take dogs for walks, escort visitors looking or adoptable pets. On nice days my neighbors come out of their houses and watch me practice Kumooyeh with my swords in the field behind the local church. I run a mile and a half in just under 13 minutes. The building I work in has four floors and I can run the stairs from the biometrics lab in the basement to the top floor bathroom without losing breath.
Is 130 heavy for a 5 foot two Asian female? I have no idea. I have extra hanging around my middle left from having two children eleven moths apart, but my weight does not prevent me from getting through a typical day, doesn't prevent me from enjoying running shelter dogs through the agility course, doesn't keep me from enjoying a romp with my kids outside. So whatever my weight, it's not keeping me from doing things I want to do so I'm happy with myself. I look in the mirror in the morning and I love the person looking back at me. And that in the end is all that matters.
WOW! This thread sounds like something out of the 700 Club..
Damn, there's a lot of hatred here for two people and their family from people that don't even know them...
Sorry, fat joke are lame...
The Military should never had ever allowed gay people or accept it. I just wonder how did this Lt. Col. get her rank certainly not by having everyone know she is a female queer which sickens the normal people. Where is the morals today if the gay asks for something they usually get it and now the sick two being discussed got turned down and don't like it. Personally I don't think the club should have offered them ANYTHING but a discharge.
amanda: 2.18 "Whap!" Seems as if every post is 'easy pickin'. Sad, isn't it? Americans to the core - freedom to fear and hate. Freedom to make no sense whatsoever. My rights rule - your rights? Phffft.
JCB-1236504 -
Wow, you really don't like to consider any evidence that goes against your opinions, huh? She is, in fact, pregnant in the photo...a quick 5 minute search reveals not only the full photo (with her "baby bump" visible) but the fact that she is due to deliver any day. She got pregnant shortly after returning from a deployment in March.
So, yes, the photo was taken this fall, probably in September or October. Despite what you may think you know, not all women "show" the same amount at the same time during their pregnancy nor gain weight in the same pattern. In fact, the fact that she has been pregnant before only increases the likelihood that she would get "bigger" more quickly this time. You have no evidence to support your insults about her weight - just your theory that she was overweight before she got pregnant. Is it possible there is another reason you have a problem with the LC?
NMCPO:
That post is derogatory, demeaning, and unbecoming an individual who made it to E-9 in my Navy.
You are an embarrassment.
Dumbo
You refer to yourself as Normal. You are not Normal.
Most people are not male.
Most people are not bigots.
Most people are not white.
You are not normal, you are simply average...and that is boring.
People with your hateful attitude are in the minority, and your kind is dying off.
You will not be missed
JCB, you're getting hated on but I agree with you, maybe it's the keyword "officer" Go to college become an officer, gee that's hard.
Now on to what I actually wanted to say, this whole thing is ridiculous, so Ft Bragg doesn't want you in their spouses club, guess what? In a couple of years you'll get a new duty station and maybe they won't be as assholish? The military is NOT civilian life, if they wanted you to have a spouse they would've issued you one.
Lesson one: military spouses can be total bitches, get over it. I know I had to. I'm married to a (now retired) 1SG I'm ten years younger then my spouse and the whole we don't use our spouse's rank is bull@!$%#, I made the mistake of believing that in the beginning. BECAUSE of my husband's rank I was ostracized and/or used all the time (sorry I can't help your soldier I have NO rank) doesn't mean they don't try.
Why would you want to be a member of a club like this anyway? Screw em, they're not worthy of having you there anyway.
Oh Christ!!! Let the woman join the club. I promise her sexual orientation wont turn you all gay! She just wants to be accepted and why not. I say oust the club from being affiliated with the military unless they do the right thing and stop thinking they are better than others.
Which one? Only one can be accepted, the other one has to join the husband club.
this world is going to hell in a hurry, and people are more worried about gays and leisbians.
Why would anyone want to join a club that they're not welcome in? All clubs vote on who will be accepted and who won't. If the club is forced to accept her, they will probably just shun her. How is this good for her or the club? You can't force people to accept you.
Search for this article:
Homosexual People and the Vindication They Long For (Part 1)
exerpt:
"The point is that gay marriage is incompatible with a nation that maintains its Christian foundation. The fact that it has gained so much support is evidence that our once great nation has abandoned its godly principles. As these principles that once protected our freedom are laid aside, real liberty will vanish along with it. "If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?" Psa 11:3"
Just another liberal lookingfor their 15 minutes of fame. Just another gay thinking the whole world should change for them only.
One is military (Lt. Col.), the other is her spouse. Military personnel do not join spouse's clubs. What a stupid statement.
Good point. Why did blacks want to join the military? Why did women? They weren't welcome at first either.
Wow, didn't realize there are still so many bigots around. When will you all just die?
This spouse's club is a private, non-profit organization.
As a private organization, they have the right to exclude whomever they wish. While I personally may find their decision to be morally and ethically reprehensible, by law it is their right.
As a nonprofit organization, under the rules of the State of North Carolina, they are required to not discriminate based on gender, color/race, or national origin; however, the laws of NC do NOT ban discrimination based on gender sexual preference.
When the Armed Forces as a whole institutes a Force-wide ban on discrimination based on gender sexual preference, this private, nonprofit spouses' club CAN continue to exclude lesbian and gay spouses; however, they would not be allowed to meet on or use government facilities for meetings--a policy which the Marines, in their infinite wisdom, made abundantly clear earlier this month.
Never !!
And if this woman was Black she would not be excluded, you betcha!!!
JayDivider
Our country is free to practice any religion...it has never been a country of " godly principles ". Just because In God We Trust is printed on our money doesn't mean that it's your God they referred to.
So what your saying here is we should go back to the"Old Ways"....how far back? When women didn't have the right to vote or when we had slavery....Just what are you saying here?
A society that fails to progress is destine to fail. We ask for Equal Rights Under The Law....NOT SPECIAL RIGHTS.
How can you say "just let her join the club", when even the military itself does not recognise the "marriage"? She can not have a military ID, as do all spouses, she can not have any military benefits, as do all spouses, but she "must" be accepted to a club that is for only spouses?...make any sense to you? If the Federal Government doesn't recognise the so called marriage, why should anyone else? The repeal of Dont ask dont tell, just says it is ok to be gay in the military, but DOMA says only a marriage between a man and woman will be recognised by the Federal Government and if Obama wanted something diffrent or even truthfully supported something diffrent, he would of had DOMA repealed along time ago. Don't be angry gays and lesbians, your vote was not the only one bought by your president to promise such great things and deliver nothing. Basically what he did was promise to be the first open president that will allow the gays and lesbians all freedoms, then you vote for him and chant his name, now he laughs at what sheeple you are by spitting in your face and not even bringing a measure to Congress to repeal DOMA and has no plans to in the future either...lol.
Amanda
The decision made by the Marines Corps is follow the order of the highest Command , DoD , The Marine Corps is not a Democratic institution , if that was the case DADT will remain unchanged.
Actually the legislation is already working its way through Congress. It would effectively repeal DOMA, and it's called the Respect For Marriage act:
It's only matter of time before DOMA falls.
redvirginia:
The policy dictated by the USMC earlier this month said that if their private, nonprofit Marine spouses' clubs wanted to discriminate against, and not allow, gay spouses to join, then they would not be able to have their meetings on Federal property--base facilities.
It seems the EEOC and butt lovers are making a mess of America and this article is another example!!!!
Amanda-2017567
That is correct, your comment does not refute my point. The policy of the USMC has to follow the policies of the DOD. However gay marriage is not legal jet in the Army , so is wrong to call wife to a person that is not legally married jet.
Redvirginia - since this is the SPOUSES CLub it is already the Husbands Club.
The Lt. Col is legally married to her partner. Mrs. Broadway therefore is a spouse.
I would argue that the Army DOES recognize same-gender marriages, as the Army recently allowed the chapel at West Point to be used to perform same-gender marriage.
All of that aside, as Mrs. Broadway does not have a spousal ID card, so she is not considered a military spouse. I was not arguing that point with you--merely pointing out that the Marines said if a private organization wanted to discriminate against a section of the population they were not allowed to do s on federal property.
@ Jaydivider its is obvious that what is going on is a dismanteling of the foundations that America was built on and that means that the foundations of Christianity will be removed as well and something comes to mind that former president Clinton, stated about our present president Obama is going to do and that is rebuild America from the ground up, that means that everything in existence today has to be tore down in order for him to rebuild the nation the way he wants it, that includes everything that is now the foundation of America, Mr Obama is as far from being a religious man as he can get, these politicians only pretend to be religious for as long as it will take to destroy the foundations of America I fear I served America and put my life on the line for nothing. this is only one side of a two sided coin.
Now we have this issue of a woman wanting to be in a spouses club but she has no husband and if she has no husband then what makes her think she is a spouse. I don't recall hearing the Supreme court hearings verdict on what constitutes a marriage, so why is this trouble maker even jumping the gun and expecting the pentagon to step in where it has no business and technically never will have any business, this is a private club right, and why is the media even running this when they wont run the one about the gay club discriminating against a straight person? this is all just one big farce. perverts are not special.
The only reason that West Point perform same sex marriage is because is in the state of New York where is legal, do not provide a federal status, so the marriage is at state level only, this is why she don't have a spouse Military ID. DOD do not recognize Homosexual marriage.
Let the spouse join the spouse's club. Some people just can't stand that they aren't "Above" other people! What do you wives and husbands think your spouses are fighting for, anyway? Sounds like a bunch of "club" beaurocrats, who think their mostly ceremonial positions mean something. The club is to support military spouses! If you can't do that mission, then get out of the way, and let somebody do the job, who has some idea what's going on! Gees!
Amanda- The organization claims to be an officers spouses club and does functions on military installations and the military has every right to say fix yourselves or go somewhere else. And they can be forced to terminate all association with the military.
hell make your own dam gay club
Spoken like a true dull mind...this isn't about being gay...it is about respect and equal access to the same amenities afforded any military spouse.
"DAM"sic right!
oz rising, while it's about respect it is also very much about being gay and equal rights for GAYS. Otherwise, her allowance into the club wouldn't even be in question.
This is about respect!!! Fu#@%$^ earn it like everyone else does. Your bitching, crying, whining, and demanding respect will not get my respect.
Except, jrsquid, "everyone else" (e.g., the other spouses in the club) were able to join the club just by applying. That's how they earned "respect" by your logic... by getting married to a soldier. Well this woman is married to a soldier too.
What would be interesting is to know if any other spouses have been denied membership based on other circumstances.
Overall it's really just ridiculous...
Is that like starting your "own dam" negro club? Did I fall into a time machine?
Hey, Little Squid,
No one wants your respect as you are a total douchbag! Who in their right mind would care what the hell you think about gays? Maybe your boyfriends???? Go back in the closet loser.
Correct me if I am wrong, but the military does not recognize homosexual "marriges".
Gays do not get any respect because they think it is owed to them. I am glad of AID's too bad they found a way to curb it.
FlaNative go back to your closet of pedophiles, child killers, voting goofs, switch hitters, inbreeds, HIV butt buddies, blue hairs, and you full fledge flaming fa**ot.
You do know what they call Florida in Oregon? Heavens waiting room.
squid: "Your bitching, crying, whining, and demanding respect will not get my respect."
Three questions.
Who, in fact, is expressing the majority of "bitching, crying and whining" on this thread.
Why would anyone be interested in gaining your respect?
What do you do to deserve respect?
I do not ask for respect and do not expect it so I have no problem with it. I am in conflict with gays demanding it.
Gays are here to stay. They have established that. Now they want more and want us to do all the changing to accommodate their needs and forget ours. If I dislike the gay lifestyle I have a right to avoid it and not listen to it. I do not need it pushed onto me so that I can be more "understanding" I do not want to understand. I treat gays with a mutual respect. I do not give them the respect as an individual or as a group that has a one way agenda.
This gay couple was given a compromise....They were offended by it because they did not get it completely their way and from their PERSPECTIVE.
Kinjiru
It is like stating womens club, mens club, boy scouts, girl scout, black entertainment, LGBT organization, NAACP, KKK, black panthers, WHAT are you saying? I can go on forever.
squid: " I do not want to understand. I treat gays with a mutual respect. I do not give them the respect as an individual or as a group that has a one way agenda."
I'm fully aware of the truth of your first sentence - you've made that abundantly clear.
Cannot for the life of me make any sense of the second and third.
"...one way agenda." A very strange sentiment, indeed, considering the source.
squid: "I am glad of AID's too bad they found a way to curb it."
You consider yourself a Christian? Comments like that will get you a First Class one-way ticket across the River Styx.
Whether you are or are not a troll, that sentence will qualify you for medical benefits - avail yourself.
Yes I have my faults obviously you are self righteous and have none or you cannot admit to them. 'One way agenda = the gay way or the highway agenda. Gays want respect and will stop at nothing. I want them to do what any other human being has to do and that is earn it.
If I had answer to how they will get respect then I don't believe it would be called respect. Every individual has their own way of getting respect. Everyone is different in that aspect. I also know that I cannot change the emotional makeup of someone and I may offend most. But I am abrasive that way and I have NEVER treated another man or woman wrong physically or in the my presence. On blogs that is a different story. I have to vent truthfully.
I cal myself a christian but like most I have backslided and I know I fall short of the glory of God. But I am not bringing religion into this. I just replied to another post. So thanks for stalkiing my posts. It tells me you are trying to see my view point.
Jrsquid... you speak as if the fact that they are gay is the reason you already don't have respect for them.
I think the fact that you are christian means you need to earn my respect. Ignorance needs to earn its right away as well, correct?
jrsquid
Fact: More heterosexuals have HIV/AIDS world wide than those that are LBGT, and that has always been the case.
According to you there is nothing one could do to earn it. So how does one do this? Stop being who they are? How about you stop being who you are and we'll see how that goes first. Lead by example!
You really should find more time to pull your head out of your ass and get fresh air.
Steve, let's do a fact check here for the USA. According to the CDC, over 60% of new HIV cases are homosexual men. The reason it has spread to heterosexuals is some homosexuals engaged in sex with heterosexual and it spread like wildfire.
Steve, go somewhere and think, afterwards, come back in and blog.
False
Another
male to male sexual contact 28,782
Heterosexual contact 4,416
#hivaidsexposure
Government statistics...
Good advice!
#hivaidsexposure
Al-524682,Jean-982597,Social distortion
Key word you idiots is WORLD WIDE. Your numbers are for the US from the CDC. Go back and read what I wrote.
Look at the stats from the WHO (World Health Organization). What I said is fact.
Damn you haters try everything to insight and promote your BS.
Try rolling the dice again, I think your stuck on stupid.
Steve-3564331,
"Fact: More heterosexuals have HIV/AIDS world wide than those that are LBGT, and that has always been the case."
I have news for you Wyle E. coyote super genius, that's becuase they are bisexual, moron. Just becuase they also engage in sex with women doesn't qualify them as a heterosexual. Also, speaking from a pure population and number perspective, a promiscuous straight male or female can perpetuate the disease faster than a homosexual person can just on sheer numbers alone. Couple that with prostitution, poverty, poor education and risky lifestyle and their you have a huge pandemic in a heterosexual community infected with HIV/Aids alone, a great example is sub-Sahara Africa where homosexuality is still considered an abomination and punishable by death, yet the disease has spread to heterosexuals who are the highest casualties because of the factors I just explained. By the way Gomer Pyle, the virus can be traced to an extremely promiscuous gay Canadian flight attendant in the mid to late 1970s. Also, in the early 1980s in NYC over 90% of the first casualties were all homosexual with the other 10% hemophiliacs(blood transfusions). At the time it was thought to be a gay sexually transmitted disease until it crossed the sex threshold barriers to encompass bisexuals then ultimately heterosexuals at which point no none was excused or safe from the disease. Did you get schooled yet?
Si vis pacem praeparet bellum
DUH!
Don't try and school me dumb ass...I've had HIV/AIDS for 18 years. I think I know the facts.
Try following the bouncing ball and the conversation if you can.
Si vis pacem praeparet bellum
The information you provided must have came from your watching " And The Band Played On".
The presumption from the CDC was the flight attendant as patient zero....However, they also have found HTLVIII in small quantities in people as early as the 40's by testing DNA of people that had died of similar AIDS related causes....Now don't tell me I know DNA testing wasn't available then...I know that too. The DNA tests where currently done.
OK Goober
Reported, read the CoH. :)
Maybe next time you can successfully debate without name calling.
Later.
LOLOLOLOL
Social distortion Couldn't debate on facts so it had to leave.
Report me please!!!!!!! Where do I report Idiots?
squid: "I am glad of AID's too bad they found a way to curb it."
"I cal myself a christian but like most I have backslided and I know I fall short of the glory of God."
May I suggest you fall short of the most minor expectations of civility, and will no doubt need a very creative ruse to get by St. Peter with that crack. I know no atheists that would think, let alone voice, such ugliness.
Thank You SDN
Steve
I will debate facts with you all day long, if you have some that you can back up with links or citations.
However, I will NOT debate with people that resort to childish name calling like you did and continue to do so. Again, read the CoH.
Like you said
Your the expert on the subject, so enjoy and have a good evening....
Social distortion
You have nothing to debate.
I suggested you look at the World Health Organization for the facts I listed.
Your not an adult...Adults can handle conversations....And why bother coming back and commenting if you have nothing but ignorance to defend yourself.
Read this ( * ) & have a nice life moron.
Let's say that they have to finally give in and make her a full member, which they should have done in the first place, but would she really want to be with a bunch of people who will more than likely look down on her and harass her to no end ? It would be kind of like when a male tried to become a waiter at Hooters. He would have been harassed by both other employees and customers. I think she should make her point and then back off because I would guess that she wouldn't like being around a bunch of women who will still not include her as one of the group.
While i disagree with this 'club's position - I agree that the end result, at least for this person will not be full acceptance. Sure we can pass laws and bylaws - but the hens that have been plucked won't likely open the hearts and arms wide anytime soon.
That said, you have to wonder about the inner workings of the club when one application turns it into a media circus event. Obviously, the ruling ladies didn't quite think through the battle.
Not sure that the club actually started this mess. I am beginning to think that this started with an agenda by the person applying (screen shots and satlking facebook pages) does not sound like normal behavior. It would not be the first time someone with a agenda went after an easy target in order to get publicity. It worked.
Absolutely! It is obvious to me that gays and lesbians are the ones who don't want to live in peace. They have too much to "prove" and are constantly looking for conflict. Anybody can act like that, but it takes a mature person to keep things in perspective and not force their ways on others.
No one is Forcing their ways on others jld35 except people like you.
We have nothing to "Prove" and the conflict that you see stems from not being treated equally under the law.
How would it be for you if this was reverse or this was your son or daughter? You wouldn't put up with it for a minute.
We are born this way.....It is not a lifestyle or a choice anymore than yours is.
So when did you know you are heterosexual?
If your anwser is you've always known, then how is that any different for us....We've always known.
Unfortunately the world of social mores is always extremely slow to catch up with a more reasoned approach...it is time for the government to drop the archaic standards and get with the program.
Same sex spouses are entitled to all the benefits of any mixed gender spouses...no government ID card and no other benefits such as family medical care, housing options, family supports, etc.???? This is an example of the distorted values of a significant system...this spouse could end up with her partner being deployed into a war theater, being injured or killed, and she and their children would end up with absolutely no supports at all. If her spouse is hospitalized in a military medical facility she may also have difficulty getting onto the military installation to reach the facility and if she is able to gain access via a daily pass (which can take upwards of an hour or more of sitting in a holding area until someone decides whether or not an individual is entitled to short term access to the installation and whether or not he or she has presented the required and ever changing documents) she will still have no entitlement to make decisions about her spouses medical care, given no information about her condition or care, and will essentially be shut out of the critical aspects of support and decisionmaking about her spouse. Archaic is another word for cephal-anal insertion syndrome. No one is compelled to adopt any lifestyle chosen by others, but being respectful of the choices made by others is a small matter in the scheme of life...small right up until a decision is made to deny that respect!
This is the best response I've read yet. Maybe once the Supremes hand down a judgement about same sex marriage which will supercede state's decisions we will see more of this type of injustice fade away just like we saw segregation issues fade. Let's hope so! Americans detest the arrogance of male-dominated cultures in the Middle East and their low respect for women; but we fail to equate that with our demeaning treatment of homosexuals. Let the Court decide then we'll gradually move into the twenty-first century. But change is coming for a lot of people, and it is time for that change! Strange how Equality works; more respect for other people equals more respect for me, too. When will we ever learn that?
Dont care if you dont go to church. Men who lie with men will not inherit the kingdom of god(and the sin of homosexuality is not the same as race, mixed race marriage or segregation). You can call people intolerent and bigoted but Jesus Christ foretold of people like you. If they hate you remember they hated me first, if they persecuted me they will persecute you for beleiving in me. So your response only strengthens my beliefs. Although from a political standpoint I may believe the federal government has no right to force gay marriage on conservitive states. Ultimetley it dosent matter because Jehovah God will vindicate those who are faithful to him in the end. So I will pray for you like Christ prayed for his executioners, forgive them father for they know not what they do. Have a nice day and god bless you.
bama1987 this is not a Theocracy. From a political standpoint, denial of a civil marriage contract between two competent and consenting adults is Unconstitutional, as has been constantly ruled when brought before the court. From a political standpoint religious beliefs can not be forced upon a Free American Citizen. The inability to realize this fact is a serious flaw in your logic, thereby your statements are irrelevant. The USMC has made a statement that it will not tolerate such discrimination. Semper Fi Do or Die! Personally, I wouldn't want to join any club, but it is probable that if Fort Bragg limps into the 21st century she will eliminate some ignorance, stereotypical thinking and bias.
Bama, from one Christian to another, do you believe that God doesn't love each and everyone of His children? I cannot, regardless of their personal struggles. God forgives you everything you ask for earnestly, I believe that he does for each and everyone of us. I cannot believe that God would hate every homosexual, especially if His children love and accept Him. I will pray for you to be less judgmental to people you know or don't know, for those who do not see things the same as you do. God loves each and everyone of His children, how could any good parent not?
Another christian acting like the devil. False prophet or whatever you want to call it. I see this type of christianity from certain people and it pisses me off. I am a christian, these curmudgeons who post their twisted opinion and relate it with God sickens me.
Funny how gays are abundant in any society where debauchery is rampant
Funny how there are the same percentage of gays in any society, regardless of debauchery. Some society just allow them to get out of the closet more than some others, like Iran.
But don't get facts get in your way.
Or move to Iran.
Funny how straight people are abundant in any society where bogotry and racism are rampant!
Any they should not get support if there partner dies, it is against nature and God. Any one who thinks this is normal, then tell me one thing, if everyone thought being gay or lesbian is a normal behavior then what would happen to the human population. I will tell you it would go extinct, if you think that is normal then God help us all.
Funny how there is no straight person here. Because if there was. You be bitching about your rights being trampled on too.
oz: Your last sentence in #6 - If I may say - an excellent articulation of the most basic of American principles. Well done. Hysteria seems still in fashion, unfortunately. Perhaps some day America will meet its founders ideals.
@Thuirwyne. When i said my political opinion, I should have said if someone forced me into giving one. Ultimetley I dont care if gay people get married or not, in reality I am pollitically nuetral on the subject. And just because I disagree with someones choices on religious grounds dosent mean I wouldn't treat that person with respect. Jesus said love and pray for your enemies and friends. If I got into a discussion with a gay person about our various beliefs, it would be a respectful discussion, and at the end whether we agreed or not I would shake their hand and walk away. But as I said before, what happens pollitically dosent matter. Jesus said his kingdom is not part of this world, he sits at the right hand of Jehovah in heaven. Jesus also said my followers should be no part of this world. Christians in actuality should stay out of politics. The gay community strives so hard for recgonition from a secular government, thats fine have it, I will respect all people but my beliefs wont change. they put their trust in the governments of men, all unbelievers do.But one day the government of men will fail. The kingdom of Jehovah will not.All Christians should put their faith in gods heavenly kingdom, as long as the government allows us to practice our relegion, we should stay out of worldly politics. Respect authority, render unto cesaer what is due him. But all these people put their faith in mans government, and it wont last forever.
bama: "If they hate you remember they hated me first." Might want to give that some thought.
bama: "If they hate you remember they hated me first." Might want to give that some thought.
@sdn. Yes, if the unbelivers persecuted Jesus for his beliefs, the unbelivers of today will persecute his followers. Whats your point?
bama: Next time I'll be less obtuse.
@sdn. I just asked what you meant. If you disagree with Jesus, thats fine, just having a conversation. Just want to know what you meant by that statement.
bama: "If they hate you remember they hated me first." Is it even remotely possible that Christ was speaking to a gay person? If not, why not?
He was speaking to one of the 12 apostles. Men who lie with men will not inherit the kingdom of god. Now, you will get no argument on the political side, all I truly care about is the freedom to practice my religion, other than that I dont care what the government does.
The Bible says 'Thou shalt not lie with a man as with a woman, it is a detestable thing.'
The Bible never says anything about women lying down with women. Therefore, your God has a double standard--and these two women would be fine to go to heaven.
And for practitioners of my religion, that is all we want, and the government infringes on that.
My belief system has sects for the gays (the Minoan Brotherhood) and the lesbians (the Dianics). If two of our Dianics or two of our Minoans choose to make a commitment to share the Goddess's Gift of Pleasure only with each other, our priests and priestesses can marry them. The government's refusal therefore, to recognize our religious marriages as marriages infringes on our First Amendment rights to practice our religion as we so choose.
As an American citizen, your responsibility is to uphold the Constitution, and so this infringement on Constitutional rights IS your business.
When I took the Oath of Citizenship I swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the US and the US against any and all enemies, foreign and domestic. I don't know if you took the Oath or you were just lucky enough to be born here, but even if you were born here and never took the Oath you still have a responsibility to uphold it.
The human race is in no danger of going extinct.The human population always has and will continue to have individuals who prefer the opposite gender as well as those who prefer the same gender. this has been true throughout time, in all cultures, societies, belief systems.
In the desert of the Southwest there's a species called the whiptail lizard. Centuries ago when the area was a fertile grassland there were both male and female of the species. But as climate changed and temps got hotter, the eggs started hatching out all females (ask any herpetologist--the ambient temperature around an egg determines the animal's gender). Today the species is composed entirely of females--and they are surviving, even thriving, with no males.
Amanda, Then you know that the Constitution should be interpreted based its original intent. Homosexually had been outlawed along Adultery and Fornication since the founding of this country. If the intent was was these things to be allowed by the Constitution, then they couldn't have been illegal when it was first ratified. Also, if you understand it, you would realize that many things the Government does to day violate the the Constitution under the 10th amendment. The Constitution was established to set a standard for the Federal Government. States originally had a lot of rights and they been taken away quite a bit in the last 80 years. Did you know that until the 1830's that in Massachusetts you had to be Catholic to Serve in Government. it was in their state constitution. You see each state is like its own mini country agreeing to be in a larger one. That is how the Constutuion was designed, but it has been wrongly erroded away.
Al:
The caveat here is that we are allowed religious freedom so if our religion says it's okay, which law gets followed? The Bill of Rights makes it pretty clear that individual religious rights are sacrosanct--That clause, religious freedom, was one of the main reasons why this colony broke of the British empire. (That and taxation without representation.) Also, many states have repealed their laws against sodomy, adultery and fornication.
However I will agree with you that as of late, the Constitution hasn't been treated as the law of the land.
ozymandias rising, Amanda-2017567
Thank You for your posts & support.
Amanda -
"The Bill of Rights makes it pretty clear that individual religious rights are sacrosnct."
Not much of a scholar on Constitutional matters, eh?
The Constitution is not at all clear on this matter, and it was only since the 1940's that several different Supreme Court decisions resulted in the personal freedoms of religion that you refer to.
"Arkansas,[ Maryland, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina,Tennessee, and Texas have some form of religious requirements to hold public office, and some require a religious test to sit on a jury or be a witness in court. These provisions were legal until the Supremes interpreted the 14th to make these provsions unenforceable.
A Marriage Certificate is nothing more than a legal document, and not a religious document.
I don't know of any marriage certificate application that asks if you are a morally religious person. Why? Because it is against the law. You can get married anywhere, not just a church.
You apply for a marriage certificate as proof that your spouse is entitled as a legal equal partner with you.
You use it for various legal matters from Social Security to health benefits and on. You just can't say "well trust me in the eye's of God we are married", no you need legal proof.
Therefore marriage has little to do with religion and more about law. So from that stand point if we are able to follow our own religious beliefs under the law, and we are of legal age to enter a contract, why is gay marriage such a problem for some people.
Stay out of my bedroom and quit telling me how I have to believe. I have legal rights too, and marriage should be one of them.
Why do these two femanazis want us to accept them? Everything in this world is not equal. Should we send quadriplegic's into space as astronauts just for the sake of equalness? The world needs heterosexuals to move into the future, the world does not need homosexuals. Think about it? Love the sinner, hate the sin!
And this response is one of the main reasons I don't go to church anymore. Intolerant fools!
Taking a stand against immoral behavior in our decaying society.
I'm not willing to accept homosexual behavior any more than I am willing to accept dishonesty, avarice, or indolence.
Peddle this increasingly immoral behavior elsewhere.
The world doesn't revolve around what you accept or don't!
Peddle your immoral prejudices else where!
That's not the reason you don't go to church anymore. That's just an excuse for the real reason. You have other underlying issues...
Great responses, John and Carl!
When are members of religious cults going to accept the fact that not all people are members of the same cult? Moreover, the use of the idiotic term "femanazies" shows what these people really are: members of the low-intelligence Rush Limbaugh supremacist crowd who refuse to accept the fact that all humans are equal.
All humans are equal but not all behaviors are equal. I am so sick of gays that constantly throw their sexuality in our collective faces, clamoring for us to accept their immoral behavior.
So, Pattie, you think that people of faith have low intelligences? What an inane statement! Maybe reflecting YOUR intelligence? I have never even heard Rush Limbaugh and don't care to in the future.
Actually, things like homosexuality, infertility, death, disease, natural disasters etc are all forms of population control. We have around 7Billionish people on earth. Imagine if there were no homosexuals or infertile people, how many more people we would have on earth. I am a Christian and I believe that God loves each and everyone of His children regardless of their personal struggles and sometimes, maybe even in spite of their personal struggles. How could any loving parent cast aside their children?
Linda M, at what point have two people of the same gender ever behaved sexually in front of you? I doubt you have ever seen hand holding or kissing between two gay people, perhaps except in movies or TV. I didn't read anything in this story describing this woman as behaving sexually in front of others or indicating that she intends to while attending club functions. Human beings seeking inclusion in the same activities enjoyed by the rest of the human race are not thrusting their lifestyles in our faces or down our throats. I'd say it's the spouses in this club that are demanding that this woman accept their lifestyles - that of ignorance, bigotry and intolerance. Why does this woman want to join a club that doesn't want her? Because, in spite of their appalling ignorance and inexcusably hateful treatment of this woman, she has the honorable intention of supporting her spouse and the other active service members on that base. Maybe enough gay spouses will be able to join to actually carry out the mission of this club and benefit active service people instead of the club members just obsessing over their own genitals and what sexual activities have been carried out with said genitals!
Char Char you are a naive and weak minded individual if you let a person, who claims to be a christian and post hate on this board, take you away from Christ.
Linda: no, I don't think that ALL "people of faith" have low intelligence. Desmond Tutu, the Dalai Lama, John Shelby Spong, the Nuns on the bus, President Obama, and Vice President Biden, for example, are all very intelligent. Just this moronic fundamentalists with their "God, guns, gays, and "intelligent design" in the schools crowd. Rick Perry, Richard Land, Pat Robertson, Family-Research-Council wave-your-hands-at-Jesus crowd.
Moreover, most people do "throw their sexuality in other people's faces everyday, but showing in different ways, like kissing in airports, who they are having a romantic relationship with and putting wedding announcements in the newspaper.
Patty, you disqualified yourself from any thoughtful conversation when you said you think Odumbo, Idiot Biden and the moronic nuns on the bus are very intelligent. Maybe you should look up the definition of intelligence, it is not reflected in any of these fools that you mentioned. I can only wonder about your intelligence if these are the people that you look up too. If I had to guess, I would say you only made it past the sixth grade, only children can look up to these people that you named.
WOW CK, hateful much? If someone is fighting for this country's freedoms, I don't car if they are straight, gay, lesbian. They deserve the rights and freedoms that every service man or woman has. If I was in a foxhole being attacked, I'd rather have a lesbian that isn't afraid to shoot a gun than a straight person with no balls to shoot.
BS: "..Odumbo, Idiot Biden and the moronic nuns.." This reflects 'intelligence'? Somebody has to occupy the bottom of the bell curve. Welcome to the band.
Liberals are the most intolerant, screaming tolerance people I know.
With this additional background information, I am beginning to sense an agenda. From the beginning, the various "gay" communities/organization have always used "equal," "the same" or "just like everyone else" as their argument acceptance of their agendas. What I find curious with this story is that Broadway the spouse, didn't just submit an application for membership, a simple procedure that other spouses would do. Broadway instead sent in a letter, identifying herself as a lesbian and on that basis inquired about membership. Being equal or just like every other spouse, I want to know why ms Broadway felt the need to highlight her "unique" sameness in her letter instead of just submitting the standard application for membership. I am left wondering now about a "what if" scenario where as member, if ms Broadway were then denied access during a function due to lack of a military dependent ID card, would that then also become to national attention?
Her lack of an ID was an excuse. When she asked to join she was being honest about her situation and status as a spouse not recognized by the military and asked what their policy was. The answer was they didn't have one so first they said no, then they said she could be not equal.
I would have to say her lack of ID which would make her ineligible for medical benefits and survivor benefits considering they have children together and their status as dependants would have more impact on their lives than not being able to attend a "function".
How do they have children together, it's not possible for two lesbians to have children together or am I missing something. I thought the reason of a male and female was to have children, if it is normal for two woman or two men to be together than they should be able to pro-create, if not then it's not normal.
Barry: I just can't elevate myself to the point where I can claim to know the universal definition of 'normal'. I just don't have the credentials - and realize it.
Barry actually genetics technology has made it possible for two women to have a child together. Probably not this particular couple but the tech is still available today.
BS: "How do they have children together"? A rhetorical question, surely?
When I first married I received many calls from my husband's squadron's Officer's Wives Club (OWC) as it was called in those days, asking me to join them for this or that activity. After having to decline many due to my work schedule my contact person asked if I was really not interested or just too busy for the OWC. I explained that as a new arrival to the base myself that I was in training and also off on missions. Oh, she said, I didn't realize you were a pilot too! No, I said, I am a flight engineer. But, she said, isn't that an enlisted position? Yes, I replied. Needless to say I never heard from the OWC again and within about a week my husband and I received letters from the base commander saying we could only go to each others clubs if accompanied by the other! Needless to say someone sent it up the chain since it was a large base.
This was not a rule for any other spouse, considering a number of spouses were former hookers guess that showed their prejudice as it does in this case... Marry a prostitute and she's welcomed into the club, marry a woman or an enlisted woman (who would have her own ID card) and they are not good enough to mingle with such high class people! While I understand the principal this lady's time would be better spent than with a bunch of hussies.
This should be one of the questions put to Hagel since he states he supports equality. If an on-base club or organization does not support equal access for all spouses, should it either be forced to do so or have its on-base privileges revoked?
There is a lot he needs to answer about this and other issues that are facing the military as well as the problems of rape and suicide, I hope he is asked about all of it.
Is this our news ? Sick of hearing it
Good God, a working miltary career woman is not good enough for these clubs? What a bunch of high school IQ level girls. I agree sea2see that Bradway would be better off not with this group. However it is sad that she will not a support group while her partner is out serving the country. What a bunch of witches, hope they remember the greatest Commandment while they are walking around with their nose on the air.
And I hope he addresses rape and suicide FIRST. The health & welfare of service members comes way before any stupid club membership.
And getting rid of all the weapons programs that we are purchasing, that the miltary has no use for.
Fed Up if you are sick of hearing it....why did you click on it, read it and then take the time to post a comment on it?
Not excusing their actions, but I imagine none of these ladies have ever known anyone who was openly gay and it makes them uncomfortable. Believe me, I kind of know how this woman feels. I am almost ten years older than my husband and I was the only wife married to someone of his rank that didn't have children. I went to a few meetings but got tired of being ignored half the time. It seemed they couldn't hold a conversation about anything other than their kids. Since I was never going to be a mom (I found out in my 20's I couldn't have children) I didn't have much to add to the conversations. Perhaps this Military Wives Club feels that Lesbian couples can't relate to any of the problems of straight couples---I assure you they can because we have neighbors who are a lesbian couple and they are the best neighbors you could ask for. From having conversations with them, they face the same day to day relationship stuff we all do. I just hope for this woman's sake she can find some sort of support group. Its especially important when your spouse is deployed to be able to talk about how you're coping or not coping with your spouse being away for months or years at a crack.
Further justifying homosexual behavior in our decaying society. Tragic.
I hope you and your antiquated ideas are retired chief, lead follow or GET OUT OF THE WAY.
sea2see, "lead, follow or GET OUT OF THE WAY". "Little mouse heart, what YOU are".. really saying is "fall in place". Atheist Pig/ common nim-wit.
You don't know me or my religious beliefs but you not being able to write coherent sentences at even a grade school level makes you calling me a "nim-wit" really funny especially when the word is nit-wit! What's up with all the quotation marks??? You sir are an Uncommon nit-wit!
How is homosexuality immoral?
How is it not immoral? Most gays hate religion, have multiple partners, do not believe in hard work, think their issues are more important to really important issues that affect the majority, Aids is no doubt started in the US by gays, gays are abundant in hollywood and any society where debauchery is rampant.
Being gay is not progression it is regression or repetition ie... Roman Empire.
I personally don't know many peoples who are gays, but the few I know :
- do hate religion, after all religion hate them so that's quite normal.
- All the ones I know have been with their partner longer than I have been with my wife.
- Have very high standing professions, most are professionals.
I'm not going to comment about the rest of your rant as obviously every person's issues are important to that person (common sense maybe) and the aids thing is just stupid.
Plus you need to learn some history.
Oh hell... where to begin... how about at the beginning...
Maybe because homosexuality is a Natural occurrence in the human race and in many animal species as well. This is scientifically documented in multiple studies. Your stance is based on a book written by men claiming it to be the words of a fantasy being in the sky. And the obvious fact that know absolutely nothing about homosexuality except it must 'freak you out'.
Soooo.... where do you find that tidbit of info, and what does it matter? There are many gays that post here on NV that are also religious. And so what? You would also say that I hate religion. I don't hate religion. I hate the idiotic thing people do and say because of their religion. Now THAT is probably true of "most gays" also.
Again, where do you get this info? And that's different from straight folks? Studies have shown your claim to be utterly false, just as the ridiculous claims about most pedophiles being gay. Simply not true.
Now THAT is probably the most ridiculous statement I've seen in days. Where DO you come up with this sh!t?
They rightfully believe that they are human beings that are deserving of the same rights and equalities as announced in the Declaration of Independence and guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States of America. I believe the American people can be 'concerned' about more that one issue at a time. And why do you believe that YOU should decide what issue is more important than another.
Damn! No Surprise! You're WRONG again.Ever heard of Africa? THAT'S where AIDs originated. That simple fact has been known and verified since the 1980's. Again... PROOF that you have no clue what you're talking about.
And probably in your hometown too.
Ooooohhh. Too easy... Again... like your hometown. Again, homosexuality has been proven by scientific studies to naturally occur in many animal species as well as in humans. IT IS NOT A CHOICE! You folks deny that because you can't justify in your mind that your 'god' made someone gay but in the bible it says you can't do it.
Being gay is a Natural occurrence. It is neither regression or progression. What IS progression is the realization that gay people are still, ultimately, just people.
People do things every day that I don't like. That doesn't mean what they do is wrong.
Why is the aids comment stupid, it is a fact that the aids virus in the United States was transmitted by a gay flight attendent. Maybe you should read the bible and it will tell you God thinks of gay and lesbian lifestyles.
squid: You got some real hate and fear going there.
You claim to know what is 'moral'. 'Moral' is, of course, a value judgement, rather than an absolute. You do realize that your definition of 'moral' (or mine) has absolutely nothing to do with our Constitution or Bill of Rights or their application in this nation? None whatsoever - that's fundamentally what makes this nation what it is.
Do you believe that our rights should be determined by your moral compass - rather than the documents mentioned above?
No matter how disparaging you are to others, your attitude will never elevate your status as a person or a citizen one centimeter.
To second Jo and Scuba- Looking at the gay people I know
-some are religious some are not. Those who are not don't (in general) hate religion. Many have just been pushed out of whatever they used follow, or left because of the awful way they were treated once they came out. Some are sad that they are so unwelcome at church, and wish they could join in again without having to pretend to be someone they are not.
-To be honest, my gay friends are a lot more careful sexually than my straight friends. A far greater percentage of my straight friends are spotty on their use of protection, engage in random, no strings attached sex, and are more likely to start sleeping with people before they begin dating (essentially meaning they have more friends with benefits relationships, and have more relationships that started originally as a one night stand)
-Finally, every single one of the gay people I know is college educated. Every one. Now whether they can find a job in this economy is another matter, but is shared equally by straight people.
So tired of this crap! Being gay is not natural, they where not born that way, they choose to live that life style, some maybe in a commeted relationship, but like someone else commented most have multiple partners. I know one couple and they break up, shack up with other women, and men then get back together for a short time. One is a professional, and the other is sorry and will not hold down a job. However if I was denied a membership to a club, guess what I would not care! This is just another gay person trying to get in the news and force their life style on others. Also did she have sex with a man to get pregnant? if so what does that say about their life style? Just another example of how the morals of this country are going to hell in a hand basket!
MIC-ALABAMA: how old were you when you decided for yourself that you were straight?
Joobyfoo....Everyone is born straight and decide from there what they do.. such as becoming gay, a pedophile, a prostitute, murderer, adulterer, drug addict...etc...the choice is yours..see?
Are there born serial killers and rapists? Crackheads and prostitutes? Environment and choice determines a lot.
yafool: fosho.
great fat slobs in the service . what have you been doing for 15 yrs. ? quit laying around with your lover & get to work.. quit playing the gay card. u will not get respect by doing so fool.
The gay card? LMFAO
Expected comment from a man named Earl.
-IF- this is "ordered" it could be that the such is not a "lawful order". Read deep into previously published account. I'd research it and bring it myself, but,,, it is "their for the taking". "Homosexuals" are --disgusting-- ALL OF THEM "Atheists". Their "isn't much of an 'argument'". Not in "my book" their isn't. Blame Obama that the -Crap- went in in the first place. HOPE that a next President "isn't" a -gay - monger such as the "likes of" B. Obama, -idiot president.
"Maybe" you should --clarify-- why THINK "homosexuals" are atheists...
or you could seriously work on your punctuation.
I know a homosexual man who told me he used to believe in God, but he kept feeling guilty all the time. So he said he accepted there is no God and now he feels great! Without a conscience, you can do anything you want and justify anything. That is why I don't trust an atheist.
Jim....I believe our commander in chief is in fact bisexual..... google "larry sinclair"
James, I think what Jim means is that you can't really believe in god and the bible and believe that a gay lifestyle is ok.
ya: "I think"? I think not.
PLEASE learn to write simple sentences in English! PLEASE "research it and bring it" the difference between there and their! Your calling others idiots is ludicrous!
This has become less about the club, and the fact that she wants in, and more about the "Cause".
I don't see what the big deal is, if you are so one sided that you can't be in the same room with gays or lesbians then you best lock yourself in your own "closet" at home.
Tend to your own backyard, and avoid all the evil if it freaks you out.
As a spouse of a retired military member, I can say that it is a difficult job to endure for so many years and one that deserves recognition. Kudos for supporting your spouse.
As a person of faith, I know that God wants us to love one another and treat our neighbors with kindness and respect.
As a U.S. citizen, I just wish one place in this United States could remain sacred. I'm sorry if that's offensive...but what about being offensive to everyone who doesn't agree with the gay lifestyle? Why do you have to force your way of living onto me? You can say that you're not...but you are. You want to be in all the clubs, religious churches, political arenas, you want your lifestyle taught to my child in school and you don't care if it infringes on my rights or beliefs. We all have rights here, not just the people who are so insecure they go out of their way to be "accepted" by society. I know I will never belong to a Gentleman's Club (I'm a woman), I know I'll never belong to the Mickey Mouse club (I'm an adult). Maybe I should throw a fit...not accept an honorary membership to the MMC...and order Disney to let me join the club or I'll make them seem like the bad guy in the whole situation.
I accept you as a person, that's it. I will treat you kindly when we meet, but it doesn't mean I will invite you to dinner--because I don't agree with your lifestyle. I wouldn't invite Obama to my home, so don't get too offended at that...I don't agree with his lifestyle either.
You have the right to live a nice life if you want. I'm not telling you to change, why do you try to make the world change for you?
I don't agree with your life style, one of judging others, something the bibles says is wrong. Your belief that what you believe should some how affect the way others live their lives within our laws. You wouldn't be invited to sit at my table because I am very anti-bigot! Nothing infringes on your right to be homophobic as long as you don't want to be accepted by society or your belief that God is OK with your twisted thinking.
Janedoh-3004900
Just what is sacred about a social club? That really is what a spouses club is. That pretty much shoots down the rest of your argument.
His "lifestyle?????" Married, has children, has a high paying job, what part of his lifestyle don't you agree with (your once chance to show you are not racist?) While I may not agree with his views on MANY things I could see sitting down to a beer with him to have a discussion.. and if he wants to join me for dinner he just has to accept the invite knowing it won't be the Ritz.
Jane: most of us here are U.S. citizens, regardless of sexual orientation, and these various organizations do not belong exclusively to you and need not exclude other citizens--which would be trampling on their rights--because of your beliefs. Your religious group is "sacred" but you have no right to ask that nonreligious public-participation groups cater to your sense of the "sacred" at the expense of others or negate another person's existence simply because you don't like him. Members of every faith and belief system have to figure out how to cope with the fact that some of their beliefs keep them from participating in something in society and deal with it as best they can. If Muslims want to attend an NFL game, they simply have to cope with the fact that beer is sold in the stadiums and the sexes do not sit separately.
Adhering to one's beliefs--whatever those happen to be--is a personal task. Your lack of agreement with the President's "lifestyle" is halarious, by the way. A married guy, never divorced, who loves his wife and has some nice children--How absolutely dreadful!
Janedoh3004900 wrote:
"As a U.S. citizen, I just wish one place in this United States could remain sacred. Sacred for whom? Sacred for everyone, or just what you deem sacred? If that's the mindset (and I wonder how ANYONE could find ANYTHING "sacred" about an officer's club), then here's a news flash for you: various people will find various things to call sacred, and exclude whomever they want on the basis of it being sacred, and sooner or later YOU will be excluded. I'm sorry if that's offensive...but what about being offensive to everyone who doesn't agree with the gay lifestyle? If you find the gay lifestyle offensive, you don't have to try it out. However, you have no right to deny a human being equal access when they aren't breaking any laws, just because YOU find them offensive. I may find your cologne offensive or your hair offensive, but I'm not gonna prevent you from walking in the door. Someone else may not find you offensive at all, and I'm okay with that.
Why do you have to force your way of living onto me? Why do you have to force YOUR way of living onto ME? You can say that you're not...but you are. READ what you wrote! You want to be in all the clubs, that she would have full access to if she were married to someone with a penis = see how ridiculous that sounds? religious churches, plenty of gay people DO believe in God, even though so many of his flock hide their hatred (of what they don't understand) in a cloak of righteous indignation, all the while ignoring the fact GAY PEOPLE COME FROM HETEROSEXUALS, and yet you hate what is made in God's image; you know, that whole "God doesn't make mistakes" thing. political arenas, Ah, that's the one you fear the most you want your lifestyle taught to my child in school If you won't teach your child to accept everyone equally, to take them on their individual merit, to treat ALL human beings with the dignity and respect they deserve, then yes, the schools will! and you don't care if it infringes on my rights Show me where you have the right to treat another human being as a second-class person? What makes YOU so damned special? or beliefs. When your "beliefs" infringe on the rights of another person, you are WRONG. You can have all the beliefs you want, but don't try to force them on others through the legal system.
We all have rights here - Fine: YOU voluntarily give up all of your spousal benefits, YOU give up everything you are allowed because you are married, YOU be prepared to be fired from a job or kicked out of your house or be denied access to your spouse when they are in the hospital, then you come back and talk about those RIGHTS and how different your life is because you don't have them!, not just the people who are so insecure Insecure? You flatter yourself, lady they go out of their way to be "accepted" by society. I was born in the USA, I pay my taxes, I've fought for this country, even to defend people like you to have the freedom of speech to say bigoted statements. I don't give a damn about your acceptance, I want my rights as a US citizen. I know I will never belong to a Gentleman's Club (I'm a woman), I know I'll never belong to the Mickey Mouse club (I'm an adult). Maybe I should throw a fit...not accept an honorary membership to the MMC...and order Disney to let me join the club or I'll make them seem like the bad guy in the whole situation. When a local gentleman's club or even Mickey starts dictating policy for all law-abiding, tax paying CITIZENS of the US, I'll stand at your side and pitch a fit with you.
I accept you as a person, that's it. No, you don't. I will treat you kindly when we meet, and say nasty little things to all your other backward-minded cronies about me when I leave the room, because the truth of the matter is you LIKE the way it makes you feel superior, you LIKE the way it makes you forget about how miserable a person you really are to hate someone, you LIKE knowing you can hide behind your hatred and exert control over another human being. but it doesn't mean I will invite you to dinner--because I don't agree with your lifestyle. I wouldn't invite Obama to my home, so don't get too offended at that...I don't agree with his lifestyle either. I may not agree with your lifestyle either, but if you were hungry, I would feed you. Even if that meant I had to eat a little less.
You have the right to live a nice life if you want. Great, then call your legislators and tell them everyone deserves the same rights you have. I'm not telling you to change, yes, you are. why do you try to make the world change for you?" Because it's the right thing to do for ALL citizens, not just the ones you want.
Who is doing the "forcing" of a lifestyle and who is being simply intolerant? I too am a person of faith and I am a military retiree who is proud of my service to my country- we should never ignore sacrifices made by servicemembers and their strong silent partners and spouses. You are absolutely correct: I too want to be in communities where we can do some good for each other and our world. But as an American who happens to be gay and married to a man that supported me in my military career, we are not afforded access to the same benefits as you and your husband- it is that simple and in a country that values equality, it is simply unjust.
Perhaps this week you will have a medical appointment covered under Tricare, the military health insurance plan, eligible due to your federally recognized heterosexual marriage- so why should my same sex marriage be discounted and render my spouse inelligble if both your husband and I have served our country honorably? And heaven forbid if you die this week, but the government affords you the privilege of being buired in a VA cemetery with the spouse you love- another heartbreaking inequality that must be exposed. You don't want want child exposed to gay people in school? Fine by me- homeschool them or find a fine religious school that supports your First Amendment views, but realize that a public school teaches kids with no respect to your particular religious view, most schools have policies that permit parents to pull kids out of curriculum on this and sex education in general and many teachers are gay or lesbian and in same sex relationationships but it has absolutely nothing to do with their ability to teach. You are simply offensive in your comparison of this woman joining a military spouse club to an adult becoming a Mouseketeer- you belittle the same sacrifices and struggles she experiences as a military spouse that you yourself have experienced. Don't fault her for wanting the same support and encouragement from other military spouses, and praise her for making an effort to be inclusive instead of creating a separate gay/lesbian spouse club which would futher destroy the community-building you yourself value. This woman has so much to offer this organization and it is their loss- and the Army's loss- if they keep the door slammed in her face.
I am glad to read you would treat me kindly, but you do not "accept me as a perso"n- this is the person I am and there is nothing like a conscious choice of "lifestyle" to it, like I was being picky about my clothes choices. When you and others throw up barriers to equality, in the name of religion in a country of constitutional laws that enshires equality for all irrespective of one's religious views, you are not treating me kindly and are as far away from the Golden Rule as you can get . Don't invite me to dinner, but remember that Jesus ate with all sorts of people- and gays and lesbians will liven up your dinner party and enrich your life- get to know some.
I am so touched by your comment!!
Jackie
Gees Jane. Seems you are all about that "no blacks, no jews and no gays". And which religion will make it into your sacred place? Is it all boys? All girls?
Seems your sacred place is at the end of Bigot Road.
Incoming!!! Everyone duck! THe front loaded pejoratives like racist,bigot,homophobe and others are on their way in.For God's sake,keep your heads down!
Everyone is a bigot who does not agree with you? WOW!
Janedoe: See what you get for articulating a thoughtful message to libs? Nothing but nasty messages back. Let me say in a more direct way what Janedoe was trying to say. You are sinners. You are living a sick deviant lifestyle. If YOU wish to do so feel free. Just get away from our children. We don't want them to choose this sinful lifestyle.
"The Truth"?
Just because it's already established, doesn't mean it's right. I appreciate your attempt at tolerance for the sake of your conscience. I understand your struggle with the outside forces that shape your children. But "change" is the one thing that can bring us closer to a more peaceful, humane, and equitable existance. "Change" allowed us to move past segregation, now we are challenged to actually put the struggle for civil rights to good use. "Change" allowed us to move past women being chattel, and not being able to vote. Now we are challenged to actually award equal pay for equal work. "Change" allowed us to acknowledge that Americans can be religions other than Christian, or none at all, and not be forced to pray to Jesus before political meetings, or attend court sessions under a document supported by only one (majority) faith. Now we are challenged to find the place where all religions can shape people's lives as THEY choose, not as chosen for them by the majority. "Change" allowed us to right past wrongs, acknowledge the necessity for living documents, respect the human dignity and worth of all people without fear of reprisal from our government or fear for our lives from a fringe. Now we are challenged to make these changes a reality so that we can come together as equals, but equals who bring a richness of ancestry, gender, religion, culture and experience to the communal pot. Please contribute responsibly.
Well said. I am really tired of the "gays" trying to push their lifestyles on everyone who does not agree with it. I too will be respectful of them but that's it.
Yes, "SDN", The Truth! Something that you and your " sheep-like hate-bleaters" can't seem to grasp or choose not to because it's the "new norm" to accept deviant behavior! When I was younger and more "open-minded" (so I thought!/or didn't think!), every new fad/idea that became overall popular at the timewas OK/cool with me so I'd be accepted by the "cool.hip/groovy crowd".(baaa) Then I grew up, aaccepted Christ as my Lord and Savior, and decided to follow Him instead of the World.
Janedoh-3004900,
Don't listen to these turds. Stick to your moral convictions and beliefs. Don't let some of these insipid oxygen thieves get to you. Their rationalization to reason with an abomination in nature is ludicrous and a complete fabrication to justify lust, sloth, and pride for personal hedonism.
Liberals, the most intolerant, tolerant screaming people!
Unbelievable. I read through the replies to my comment and it amazes me that I was the one being called a bigot. Do you realize the hate that was just thrown at me? Look in the mirror, people. I never judged you, but boy did you judge me.
Do you realize that just because I said I wouldn't invite Obama to dinner I was called a racist? His skin doesn't matter, and that is definitely NOT why I said that. To the couple of responses who said his lifestyle is simply his marriage and having children...stop being silly. Lifestyle is much more than that. The part of his lifestyle I don't agree with is him taking 20 day family vacations in the middle of a budget crisis ON MY DIME. Did any of you catch how much that cost the taxpayer? Before you get your panties in a bunch...I do think he deserves a vacation, when the time is right. He used poor judgement on that one.
Chuck--thank you for your response, the most eloquent and eye-opening response of all. I do believe your spouse deserves the benefits of Tricare, burial, etc. I actually believed that before reading your comment, though I can see how it didn't appear that way. I guess I was just irritated that the spouse's club was trying to work with the spouse in the article and she refused them, perhaps justifiably.
Cathy V.--way to twist every word I said. First, I'd like to say that you don't know me. You jumped to some massive conclusions there. I've taught my children to love others and that I'll love them no matter what, straight, gay, stripper, wal-mart employee, murderer, etc. What really irritated me the most was your assumption that I would say "nasty little things" behind people's backs. Nope, not me but nice try at painting me as a horrible person.
Girl Kryptonite--not a bad response at all, but you are flawed in a couple places. Women still do not receive equal pay (about 77 cents per dollar actually) after all these free-to-vote years. Also, not being "forced to pray" is just proving my point really. What if I want to pray? What if my son's entire school classroom wanted to say a prayer? They're not allowed to because people who don't believe have taken that right away from them. Pray in silence? Why can't I pray out loud? Free speech, as long as it isn't prayer. My "tolerance" as you put it, is not for my conscience. I treat others kindly because it's the right thing to do. The right thing to do here is to let this spouse join the club as a spouse, not an honorary member. But, it's up to the club to do the right thing here, not up to her.
The Truth 2190315, stop trolling and learn to read. Never try to translate what I say again.
Jane -
Not unbelievable at all. It is what you can expect when you post an opinion contrary to what the seeming majority on "hateVine" hold.
Some of the rest of us applaud you for stating your thoughts/values in a very readable manner without the typical insults and denigrations we see in so many posts.
Jane,
MPA is correct. Though I don't agree with all of your statements the eloquence and polite manner in which you stated your case (as usual) is certainly respected by many of us.
Sadly there are many people on the vine that can only revert to name calling when your words don't support their agenda.
I will say this on topic, while I understand that certain things are uncomfortable- it doesn't mean that you support any cause just because you tolerate what you can't comprehend.
DOH! is right! OMFG! It's called "Church!" Keep that as 'sacred' as you want. Keep your church of hypocrites. This is a 'spouses club.'
Do you even know what the word sacred means?
devoted or dedicated to a deity or to some religious purpose; consecrated.
Look how fat Lt. Col. Heather Mack is!
If she were straight she would have been kicked out of the service by now.
Morgan1
you do realize she is pregnant, per the story?
But.. she's 9 months pregnant.
Although the 'wife' or 'woman' is pregnant, it can't be by her 'spouse'......Maybe someone is playing around with a man...............
OUCH!! Thats going to leave a mark!
It's called S C I E N C E. A little thing commonly called 'artificial insemination.' In vitro fertilization is the correct term if I'm not mistaken. Been around quite a while now. (The first successful baby was born in 1978.) It's also very widely used by heterosexual couples that can't get pregnant otherwise. Something the 'right' seems to have no problem with until the 'spares' come into the picture. BTW, shouldn't these couples be denied the right to marry if they can't procreate naturally? Isn't that why the 'right' claims homosexuality isn't 'natural?'
The rainbow coalition would be happy to recieve you both.
If any club whelter military related or not rejected you for any reason then thats not the club for you.......move on! Gays need to remember that not everyone in the USA agrees with your lifestyle choices which is being crammed down everyones throats forcing people to accept it which is not fair as we all are entitled to what we as individuals believe. If one does not have a military ID card then one is quite limited......I'm not a hater by any means as how you chose to live your life is your choice but this Gay ordeal has gotten to be really boring and I'm not old fashion just still BELIEVE IN GOD WE TRUST and HE DOESN'T MAKE MISTAKES....people do!!! We all have the freedom to grow-up, get a job, and pay taxes....end of story!!!
God is unconditional love - the beginning the middle and the end past infinity... inside us... in the very heart of us all.
You're right. People do make mistakes.
But at some point, they can start waking up, get past the human foibles and become godlike. After all, it is our true nature to become so.
Maybe the ladies in the club simply don't want a female muff diver in their club.
People living their lives with the same freedoms is what America is about, you don't have to agree...move on!
This dispute is about power....nothing less. Why would she want to be included in a group that doesn't want to include her? Gays want to ensure that being homosexuals gives them super civil rights that trump everyone else's rights to choose their associates, and ensure that everyone understands their special status, after all, every aspect of their life and yours has to be about their homosexuality.
Nicely put. These small minorities are nothing but whiners and troublemakers. Funny how they want everyone and every group to accept their abnormal lifestyle.
Ya, these flap lickers want to be treated like normal. That's just plain crazy talk right? Why would anyone wish to be treated the same as everyone else. Maybe the other wives don't think she can provide enough conversation about smoking their husbands meat whisltes.
astounded: You're right, of course. The power to enjoy the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights - no more, no less. Super Civil Rights? Can't find that in the Constitution.
reality: Accepting lifestyles is what America is all about. "Abnormal", in the context of US Citizenship, is not accepting other's lifestyles.
What hogwash. Every time someone asks for equal treatment, the bigots scream they want special treatment.
My understanding is that the lady that is married to the Marine Lt Col. has the right to submit an application to be considered for membership. The Ladies that are members of the club have the right to vote on applications for membership, the right to choose their associates and companions. The spouse of the Marine doesn't possess the required paper work that would give her access to full membership....a military spouse ID...I fail to see how she is being denied her rights.
The U.S. military does not recognize same-sex marriage under the Defense of Marriage Act and does not offer benefits — or ID cards — to same-sex spouses.) She is not a spouse.
Fat pregnant and gay. What a world this is coming to be. She has a Baby by a man or other. Marries a gay women instead of a man, And looks like she could stop eating for a long long time. I thought are Military had some kind of health code. But i guess the Military is going gay as will. Your for a thing or not. You that say gay is ok are just as bad as the gays. Gays some how have a lot of power in government and state, Kids now days don't stand a chance with all this unGodly @!$%# going on. America is going to hell and fast. It's sad this was a great country now it's going gay. Do you think they will have a gay flag too. A gay day. Will the Military, That is the gay Military come after STRAIGHT people be for to long? All this is possible. A gay Corps is in the making right now. Think kids have trouble now just wait. And those in government that say they care for are kids are for gays, So what does that tell you. It's just a matter of time.
You're clearly unaware that there is such as thing as a sperm donor, huh?
If any man here wants to bitch about 'fat', pregnant, lesbian women who are in the military and isn't in the military himself, I suggest you haul your ass down to the recruiter and sign on the dotted line. Less than 1% of this country's population serves in the military so that the rest of you jerks can sit around and complain.
I was in the military. And what would these sick people do if there were no sperm banks. When i was in the military there were health codes and dress codes. Not any more. And look how things are. Gays have all was been here and have all ways been looked down on for more then one reason. It's a unGodly way of life. But you being gay i can see how hard that is to take . If your sick get help.
"that prompted a pro-gay Marine Corps directive" - no, that directive wasn't "pro-gay" - it was "pro-EQUALITY". Had it been "pro-gay", it would have offered benefits above and beyond what straight spouses receive.
I should have clarified, not a military spouse.