10-14 rounds fired into van on Chicago highway, killing woman

NBCChicago.com

An aerial view of the scene in Chicago where a woman driving a van was shot dead.

A Chicago woman was shot and killed Friday morning while driving her van on the ramp from Lake Shore Drive to Interstate 55.

Illinois State Police said a 32-year-old woman and a 37-year-old female passenger were driving a white Dodge van south on Lake Shore Drive around 4:20 a.m. when the shooting occurred.

A brown, full-size van pulled alongside them as they entered the ramp to I-55 and someone opened fire with 10 to 14 rounds, shooting the driver, police said. The woman's van then crashed into the median. She was pronounced dead at Northwestern Memorial Hospital.


For more, visit NBCChicago.com

The other woman was not injured and was taken into police custody for questioning. She is not considered a suspect.

Police said the shooting was related to gang and drug activity and was not random.

No other vehicles were involved in the crash. Police are still looking for the shooter, and the shooting remains under investigation.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4 ... 7

IRA assassins taking out the family of a former member??

  • 1 vote
Reply#27 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:15 PM EST

Buy more guns..
More and more and more guns..
We can never have enough guns in Amerika...

  • 2 votes
Reply#28 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:15 PM EST

You need to get an update, They don't allow guns in Chicago!

  • 5 votes
#28.1 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:23 PM EST

You need to get a new post bart. That one getting real old!

  • 2 votes
#28.2 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:43 PM EST
Reply

The woman's van then crashed into the median. She was pronounced dead at Northwestern Memorial Hospital.

The median killed the woman, and so we must hold the median industry accountable! They're just money-hungry bastards that don't care who gets killed!

  • 3 votes
Reply#29 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:18 PM EST

You've just made 1000 lawyers mouth's water.

  • 3 votes
#29.1 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:38 PM EST

You've just made 1000 lawyers mouth's water.

The time has come for sane median control! No more steel-reinforced concretre! Roads were meant to be on the Earth, not raised. I don't see why anyone would complain if this were a cobblestone or dirt road as the Founding Fathers intended.

    #29.2 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:42 PM EST

    Yeah we know they never once intended for us to have big highways or speeding cars so we better just get rid of all that stuff....

    We need to throw out that pesky thing that keeps politicians under control and gives the people the power, it is getting in the way of Obama from changing everything, He just keeps saying over and over again how he wishes he could just ignore Congress and do what he wants, or the court system that gets in his way, you know just go around them and make them obsolete since they just keep him from being able to do whatever he wants to do!!!!

    That pesky ole Constitution and Bill of Rights!!!!! They are outdated and a bother so lets just get rid of them and have an monarchy, I know the Obamas would just love that!!!

    • 1 vote
    #29.3 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 1:10 PM EST
    Reply

    So now every time there is a shooting somewhere in the country it is going to make national news? Why not just designate a new section for it. US & World, Business, Weather, Sports, Shootings, ...

    • 3 votes
    Reply#30 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:18 PM EST

    I am sure that is coming soon on MSNBC or any of the other lib news agencies... They have ordered their staff to go out and look for every single possible shooting so they can run it on the main news every minute hour or day, that way they can try and convince the useful idiots that it is only started happening since obama got re elected and he wants a so called assault weapons ban.

    It has never happened before now so we must act now, can't wait, must act now, it is an emergency, must act now!!! OMG we must ban all big magazines, guns, them scary looking lib named assault weapons....

    • 1 vote
    #30.1 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 1:15 PM EST
    Reply

    As my Mother used to say nothing good happens after midnight and boy, was she right!

    • 1 vote
    Reply#31 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:19 PM EST

    How can this happen? They don't allow guns in the windy city!

    • 4 votes
    Reply#32 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:21 PM EST

    40% of gun sales are to people without a background check. That is the reason we need a universal background check law.

    • 2 votes
    #32.1 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:31 PM EST

    Jersey Michael:

    That is a complete falsehood. Those statistics are 20 years old and from a study that only included 251 surveyed individuals. Hardly a valid sampling in 1994 when the study was published and even less valid now as the NICS background check system is in place where in 1994 it was not.

    • 3 votes
    #32.2 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:41 PM EST

    40% of gun sales are to people without a background check. That is the reason we need a universal background check law.

    100% of van sales are to people without a background check. That is the reason we need a universal background check law.

    • 4 votes
    #32.3 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:43 PM EST

    The Department of Justice report was was based on 2568 phone interviews. It has a standard deviation of 1.4%. So the correct answer is from 38.6% to 41.4% of all gun sales have no background check.

    Objectives: Provide national estimates for:
    • Adult ownership of guns, by gun type.
    • Sources and motivations for gun acquisition.
    • Firearm safety and storage.
    • Defensive use of firearms.
    • Attitudes toward gun control.
    Sample: Probability sample of 2,568 noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 and over who are fluent in English or Spanish and
    live in households with a telephone.
    Method: Telephone interview with one randomly selected adult from each household.
    Population estimates: Weighted averages of relevant responses. Standard errors for estimates of population-prevalence
    rates range up to 1.4 percentage points, somewhat higher for prevalence estimates within subpopulations.

    The whole report can be found here

    https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/165476.pdf

    • 2 votes
    #32.4 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:52 PM EST

    Jersey Michael you are reading that wrong... That is just their base sampling, not the number of actual completed interviews. If you look at the fine print it states that they only received a ~45% response rate. Additional information on purchase source was only taken from 251 of the respondents. Either way it doesn't matter is THIS IS 20 YEAR OLD DATA.

    • 2 votes
    #32.5 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 1:32 PM EST
    Reply

    This is Chicago with the toughest gun laws in the nation. Only the Democrat Drug Gangs have guns. Obama, Emanuel, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton all support the Black gangs! NONE of these POLS have shut down the killers. Democrat campaign contributions from the gangs are critical to allow Illinois Democrats to continue to bankrupt the state! Obama is the top politician for the city with a massive murder rate and massive child shooting rate. Obama is the top politician for the state that is ranked last by Moody for fiscal competence. Obama is a DUD who should be impeached!

    • 2 votes
    Reply#33 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:24 PM EST

    The gangs are probably sparking this under the direction of Rahm and Stinky (bo). They're on the administrations side that law abiding people have no business owning guns. Gang members sure don't want to deal with return fire from civilians.

    • 1 vote
    #33.1 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:58 PM EST
    Reply

    Be interesting to see the chamber of commerce tourist ads this year.

      Reply#34 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:29 PM EST

      really??? a drug problem in chicago?? gang problems??? guns owned/used by criminals...more info they will use to try and ban guns from legal law abiding citizens....time for the police to go dirty harry on there sorry ass's

      • 4 votes
      Reply#35 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:31 PM EST

      Gangs, Drugs, Mental illness are the problem, it's all the guns.. Just like the budget debate. It isn't the spending that's the problem it's the low revenue problem.. Come on can't anyone see this ? That is how Obama see it so it must be so..

      • 1 vote
      Reply#36 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:31 PM EST

      mo's; when you are banning something you are taking it away!

      It is like you collect antique cars and I decide we are no longer going to allow that so I ban all of the stuff you like to collect, no more parts for your cars, no more cars, anytime we get one we destroy it, that is taking them away because sooner or later you antique car is going to need something or it will not work and since you can no longer buy the stuff you need your car is now worthless and cannot be used, so it was taken away from you!!!!!

      If you read the goals of the proposal they even admit it is to slowly take the so called assault weapons away as they run out of parts and supplies they will disappear, that is the goal, to TAKE THEM AWAY!

      You have to look at the list of so called assault weapons they want to ban, there are more than 160 of them that they want out right banned!!!! Not to mention the banning of magazines so that even most pistols will need to be remodeled, some of the stuff they are pushing will make a 22 illegal if it has a piece of plastic on it....

      • 1 vote
      Reply#37 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:35 PM EST

      Mayor Rahm Emanuel needs to declare Martial Law and mandatory evacuation of all non-felons. The National Guard can then close off all entrances and exits. The felons can either turn themselves in or be caught and/or neutralized by a street by street and block by block clearing--much like a severe pest infestation of rodents being removed. The Chicago Police Department can't handle the amount of crime! Call in the Guard! Chicagoans, insist that something drastic is done to get your city under control!

      • 1 vote
      Reply#38 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:36 PM EST

      Great idea!! The non-felons can hop into a Prius or Volt and head on out. Do any decent people live there anymore? Isn't it Rahm, the CTU, and the gangs who live there now?

      • 1 vote
      #38.1 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:51 PM EST
      Reply

      The only answer is, BIGGER PRISONS!

      • 1 vote
      Reply#39 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:40 PM EST

      I was going to say more Death Penalties but this is Chicago we're talking about.

      • 2 votes
      #39.1 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:49 PM EST
      Reply

      I'm so confused. How does someone get shot in Chicago? Aren't guns banned in that city??

      • 4 votes
      Reply#40 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:42 PM EST

      I'm beginning to think that some of these Chicago Hood Rats, aren't NRA members!

      • 4 votes
      #40.1 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:47 PM EST
      Reply

      So why is this a story? If this woman was involved in drugs and gangs, well, didn't she know that there was a good probability that this could be her fate? She made the choices in her life. She probably got what she deserved. How many other lives did she shorten or end? But that story will never be reported.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#41 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:42 PM EST

      Nothing, absolutely nothing in this story suggests that the woman who was killed was involved with gangs or drugs.

        #41.1 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:57 PM EST

        Police said the shooting was related to gang and drug activity and was not random.

        • 1 vote
        #41.2 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 1:48 PM EST

        Reading comprehension is important, isn't it?

          #41.3 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 1:59 PM EST

          Right. It still does not say SHE was involve in gangs or drugs. Perhaps it was her passenger, or a family member, or mistaken identity.

            #41.4 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 2:09 PM EST
            Reply

            Gotta love those democratically controlled cities but clearly this is what the people of Chicago wanted. How do you like it? Keep voting in the libs and you'll get more. Great job Rahm, way to go big guy!! States going broke and you can't walk across the street in Chicago w/o getting shot. LOL, the people are getting exactly what they asked for!

            • 3 votes
            Reply#42 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:46 PM EST

            grass is really tall in right field there La.

              Reply#43 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:46 PM EST

              You know what they need in Chicago? Strict gun laws. If they had strict gun laws this wouldn't have happened. How about it Rahm? You said the cold weather has kept crime down. Can't wait till spring!!

              • 2 votes
              Reply#44 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:48 PM EST

              Police said the shooting was related to gang and drug activity and was not random.

              In other news Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said that he will now be adding 300 cops.


                Reply#45 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:48 PM EST

                Was it really gang/drug related?! I sure hope not random!!!! But looks like we might have to burn Chicago down before they start killing the neighboring city/states citizens after killing theirs!!!! @!$%# CHICAGO!!!!!!

                • 1 vote
                Reply#46 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:49 PM EST

                Chicago shootings are so common place now they should start reporting on days when no shootings occur. Just think there would be no news coming out of Chicago. Ever.........

                • 1 vote
                Reply#47 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:50 PM EST

                we all know the story, citizens too scared to report gangbangers to police.

                Police cannot do anything about it without citizen tips.

                Gangbangers just need to be executed period or deported to Iraq

                • 1 vote
                Reply#48 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:54 PM EST

                Ban guns, ban driving, ban vans, there we go that will put a stop to the madness!!!!

                • 2 votes
                Reply#49 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:55 PM EST

                Another one for Wayne.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#50 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:55 PM EST

                I just love how the liberal media has to make sure how many rounds were (supposedly) fired in the headline and then again in the story to make sure we all knew how many were fired. Could it be because their fearless leader is pressing for a 10 round clip? Did they ever stop to think it could have been more than one gun??? Had it been one shot, maybe two, killed BOTH women and took out 56 cars? The the headline would have read "Two women dead in drug related car accident".

                  Reply#51 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 12:55 PM EST

                  Am I the only one who thinks it is strange that the amount of shots supposedly fired fits right into the agenda of banning magazines?

                  How many shooters were there? maybe there were 10 - 14 shooters and each fired one round!!! Who knows, it is just as likely since no one was caught so they have no clue but, lets run with it any way and bring up the 10 to 14 rounds that were supposedly fired so it sound good for the anti gun agenda......

                  • 2 votes
                  #51.1 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 1:44 PM EST

                  I don't know. To me, that the bad guys had at least 10 rounds in their magazine makes my argument for why I (a legal firearms owner and law abiding citizen) need more than 10 round magazines. I am NOT looking for an even playing field with someone who would try to hurt me or my family. My goal is overwhelming superiority in arms. Has worked well for the US since its founding. I tend to emulate that.

                  • 2 votes
                  #51.2 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 2:02 PM EST

                  Ther anti-gun movement probably isn't aware that 10 round revolvers are available, so the gun used might not be on the proposed restriction list. Two guns 20 rounds. No "assault weapon" needed.

                  • 1 vote
                  #51.3 - Fri Feb 1, 2013 2:55 PM EST
                  Reply
                  Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4 ... 7
                  You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                  As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.