
Gregory Bull / AP
A section of the previous version of the statue "Unconditional Surrender" shown as it was being removed in May 2012.
San Diego held a party for a 25-foot tall couple along the Embarcadero Saturday as the sculpture "Unconditional Surrender" was welcomed with a public dedication.
A large crowd of people celebrated the giant sculpture many call the "Kissing Statue" or "The Kiss" in downtown San Diego Saturday.
“We are in San Diego, we have the greatest number of veterans and active duty of any community in the nation,” San Diego Mayor Bob Filner said. “This belongs here.”
Filner and a number of public officials spoke, a military band played and many couples took their own pictures re-enacting "The Kiss" in front of the statue.
The infamous embrace starring a sailor and a nurse is an iconic image of the end of World War II.
Port Commissioner Lou Smith said he’s always seeing young people whose parents weren’t even born before 1945 taking photos in front of the sculpture.
“This is the most magical place of all,” Smith said. “Whoever sprinkled pixie dust on it did a great job.”
Read more stories at NBCSanDiego.com
It made its grand return on Wednesday morning – just in time for Valentine’s Day.
For the ceremony, the theme of renewing love continued when nearly a dozen couples renewed their vows at the foot of the statue.
David Moore flew bombing runs over Germany in World War II.
He said he and his wife, Claire, remember seeing the embrace on the news after the end of the war.
View more videos at: http://nbcsandiego.com.
They joined the couples in renewing their vows.
“It’s very sentimental,” Moore said of the public sculpture.
When he sees it, he thinks of how happy he was that they could get back to civilian life.
David and Mary Flohr, engaged in 1947, also renewed their vows Saturday. The couple has three children 8 grandchildren and 8 great-grandchildren all living in San Diego.
John Sax, who served in the South Pacific in World War II as well as in Korea, was very happy to see the statue return.
He called it, “a perfect example of people showing their love of the serviceman."
"Unconditional Surrender" left San Diego last May. That statue was owned by Santa Monica-based Sculpture Foundation and was on loan to the Port from 2007 to 2012.
Since then, more than $1 million was raised through public donations to bring a permanent replica back to the bayfront.
Bill Craddock is a member of San Diego’s Pearl Harbor Survivors. The chapter, one of the largest in the nation according to Craddock, has 42 members here in San Diego.
As for the controversy over whether the statue is a worthy piece of public art, he has this to say.
“Art lovers don’t love it but the people love it and that’s what counts,” he said.


Good for San Diego! Nothing wrong with keeping Love Alive. "What the world needs more of now is love, sweet love...."
PS: Nowhere in the article does it say anything about Controversial as your headline states. What's up with that?
Nice to see the child in the photo to give the sense of the size .... It's a big piece of art work ..
And the authors refer to it as "infamous." Pah-leeze. Get a grip—or at least get a dictionary.
It's a lot nicer statue than the one we have downtown. The "art" in this town is a huge fire hydrant that has been hit, and water is coming out. Some people call that art. At least the kiss is showing some human interaction.
jack from Jax,
"Nowhere in the article does it say anything about Controversial as your headline states. What's up with that?"
They did mention in the last few lines of the article that it is controversial among art lovers, but the people love it. Otherwise, I agree with you. Did anyone notice that sailor's neck, though? It doesn't look quite right to me. It kind of bulges out in back, and the bottom of it is much thinner than the rest.
@Mickey - I think what you are seeing with the neck is the white collar on his uniform. Because the photo is a little overexposed, the white collar blends in with the sky in the background so it is pretty much impossible to distinguish in the photo. I do not know why anyone would call this statue controversial. It may not be seen as art by some stuck up, pretentious art critics, but it is definitely art. There is nothing controversial about the statue itself, it represents one of the most famous photographs ever taken.
JS in SD- that's Popeye,The Sailorman.
“Art lovers don’t love it but the people love it and that’s what counts,” he said.
This is perhaps the best quote for this statue. The goal of any art, architecture, design, etc. is to let others appreciate it, right? And if the people love it, then it's successful. If you are making something because you feel only you and your tight nit professional group are the only ones who truly appreciate it, then you really are just conceded.
I'm gonna keep that quote. I'm getting my masters degree in Landscape Architecture in just a few months, and this defines public spaces.
I like it. Two thumbs up.
I want one in my front yard...I could charge admission. But $1 million...really?
They have one similar in San Francisco only its two dudes getting it on.
King Putt - References or put a sock in it.
no more filbert.
I wish you the best. Great career choice.
Art will always be controversial, and "public art" even more so because the appreciation of art is so individual. But the controversy is arguably just as important as the art itself; because it forces us to engage, and engaging with one another is a vital part of being human.
Art is important for mankind. It has always been so. It's in our DNA. So much of what we know of the earliest humans is from the cave art and petroglyphs and carvings and sculpture which has survived over the millennia to show us our origins, and confirm our natures.
Public art is a statement of who we are today, not because we universally like or appreciate an individual work of art, but because we support cultural and artistic expression and seek to leave a legacy marking our short time on this planet; our way of saying to those who will inherit the Earth after we are gone, ... "We were here; and this was who we were."
To believe that CA or even San Diego will crack off and fall into the ocean is absurd. Japan sits along a deep trench. It had an 8.9 and didn't fall into the ocean. We had a 7.2 three years ago from a faultline in Mexico and it barely did any damage here.
IF we had a large earthquake on one of our faults it will certainly do a lot of damage and maybe some of the multi-million dollar homes in La Jolla wouldn't be there any longer, but it's for damned sure the city isn't going to slide into the ocean.
Too bad the girl is not in a tight top...
There always has to be someone pissing and moaning about something. This statue deserves to be in San Deigo. This is where Americans first celebrated the end of WWII. It was a very wonderful time and love ws in the air.
People are generally happy when a war ends .. and one that ends in victory ... is a particularly pleasing event!
As I recall ... this was our last victory at war ...and people were happy the death & destruction was over ... and was the beginning of a economic boom period ...
IndependentThink, It belongs in San Diego because of the Naval Base / Port and their citizens PAID for it. Agent Orange was Vietnam so your have you decades confused. It was wonderful to those service people because the brutal Pacific war was won and they were finally home. I hope you are "enlightened" now. You were probably one of those booing gay service men and women so there is not much hope for you.
This is an awesome display and shows what a community can do with a good cause. A+ to all of you.
moonbeamracer,
"and was the beginning of a economic boom period ..."
And it was also the beginning of an endless series of smaller wars (Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.), but those people celebrating the end of WWII were blissfully ignorant of that.
The only thing that is screwed up is your thinking........
"And it was also the beginning of an endless series of smaller wars (Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.), but those people celebrating the end of WWII were blissfully ignorant of that."
This makes absolutely no sense. Does this mean that you too are ignorant because you are not talking about events happening 10, 20 and 50 years in the future now?
The actual event of a sailor kissing a nurse during a celebration of the end of WW2 was photographed in Times Square in New York city. It wasn't a romantic kiss, as many want to believe now, as the sailor was drunk and the nurse was a complete stranger. And it has nothing to do with San Diego.
Independent Thinker, What are you thinking independently of, your brain?
no more filbert,
"Does this mean that you too are ignorant because you are not talking about events happening 10, 20 and 50 years in the future now?"
Of course it does. Do you know what is going to happen 10, 20 or 50 years from now? No? Then you are ignorant of what is going to happen. The word "ignorant" come from the Latin word "ignoro", meaning "I don't know". Being ignorant doesn't mean you are ignorant of everything; that you now nothing at all. In this particular case it simply means you are ignorant of what is going to happen in the future unless, of course, you are clairvoyant. Are you clairvoyant?
This guy is implying that because they did not understand the numerous wars to happen after WWII, and that they are celebrating the costliest war in the history of mankind, that they are ignorant of that fact. This is what he is talking about.
Also, ignorant, though derived from ignore, is more specific in nature, as it means "Lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular"
I will be back on to this site in 50 years calling you ignorant for not mentioning whatever has happened since.
Sure, I'm clairvoyant. Give me all your money, and I'll invest it "wisely" for you. :)
no more filbert,
"This guy is implying that because they did not understand the numerous wars to happen after WWII, and that they are celebrating the costliest war in the history of mankind, that they are ignorant of that fact. This is what he is talking about."
No. That is not what I am talking about. I said they were blissfully ignorant of the smaller wars that would follow WWII. How could they possibly have been ignorant of the fact that they were celebrating the end of WWII?
"Also, ignorant, though derived from ignore, is more specific in nature, as it means "Lacking knowledge, information, or awareness about something in particular"
That's it! Now you've got it! Exactly! You are ignorant of anything you don't know or are unaware of at a particular time. For example, if you can't speak Chinese, you are ignorant of Chinese, but if, at some later date, you learn Chinese, you will no longer be ignorant of it. That's the whole idea behind learning. We learn things we are ignorant of so that we will no longer be ignorant of them. You and I are ignorant of all sorts of things right now, but we can learn them and won't have to be ignorant of them anymore. All I was saying was that these people who were celebrating the end of WWII were blissfully ignorant of the smaller wars that were to follow it. How could they have known? I think you misunderstood me and thought I was blaming them for not knowing what was to come because they were stupid. I was not.
You can't be ignorant of something that hasn't happened yet, as you would not have had the opportunity to "ignore".
Lacking knowledge of something that hasn't happened yet would apply only to a psychic.
Just wondering how Gene Simmons can make some money off this thing.
Hey Stinkerer - Maybe it deserves to be in San Diego cause it's a Navy Town. I remember when I got out of the Navy In San Diego I had to wait till I got all the way back to Michigan for my Kiss.
Some of us stayed loyal to our Spouses. What makes you think you know that I didn't? Oh I forgot you are a Republican and you know everything. NOT!
Maybe I didn't like the Joke. Maybe if you were over 4 years old and maybe served in the Armed Forces you would be more germane.
If you served in 2 wars than my thanks to you. Why does the gay community have to stand for equal rights? Shouldn't they have them? By the way after reading remarks on these comment section I seem to have lost my sense of humor.
But why should they not be allowed to be a couple?
Independent Thinker? -- An identical copy of the statue stood there for five years until last year. If it hasn't happened yet why do you think it will happen now? It is a great draw for a public park near the cruise ship piers and US Navy Museum on the carrier Midway.
Independant thinkerer self-removed their own account, but would have been banned anyway - multiple RBknows also banned.
Came to comments to mention that the story is weak in the "controversy", given it's headline. Happy to see that the last couple of posters can fill it in for me, it's either the gays, the liberals, or the gay liberals that are responsible. You guys are AWESOME!
The 'controversy' seems to all be in the comments today
That is a great commerative statue to peace. War was simple then. Peace is difficult now.
Well said Bill.
I have to say: This is one of the most poorly written, poorly organized, and altogether fact-free articles I've seen on this site. The reader wades through paragraph after repetitive paragraph of cutesy-pie fluff, after which the "original vs. replica" idea is suddenly tossed out at the end without much explanation. The "controversy" referred to in the headline? Also poorly explained, also tucked away at the end. This is junk.
A. we are 16tri in debt
b. we did not win ww2 russia faught 100s of nazi devisions where as allied forces founght only 12 devisions
c. all nazis moved here after it was over. hint nasa formed by nazis
d. that thing cost a million. why its is ugly ash hell
E. art? by who the worlds worst artist.
F. why would anyone want to celebrate war. morons
A. 16 Trillion in debt, has nothing to do with this article.
B. You better take a look again at the old history books, and use some logic and reasoning this time, because we did the most in WW2 to end the war. Tip: Greatest Air Supremacy, we bombed the German factories that supplied the German war machine, which actually helped Russia...
C. Better for us to have them than Russia. They helped us greatly in the space race.
D. I have seen much more uglier art, "a real eye sore." That costs a hell of a lot more.
E. I am sure you're community is loaded with artist we have never ever heard about.
F. They are not celebrating war, they are celebrating the end of it, "Taken from real life photo."
@ iaosilver
1) Where we weren't fighting WWII, we were supplying our allied countries. So, yes, we can claim part of the victory.
2) Not all Germans were Nazis
3) I have seen much uglier works of "art" that cost a heck of a lot more
4) It was never a celebration of war... it is a celebration of peace... moron
and by the way.... I will take you more seriously when you learn to spell.
The phrase 'a little knowledge is dangerous thing' comes to mind.
Silver <<<~~~~~~~~>>> That stature, and the photo the statue reproduced, is celebrating PEACE, not WAR. The messing up of the peace, at that time, lies in the future.
iaosilver:
A. Learn to spell; it makes your comments so much more compelling
B. NASA started by Nazis. Ah. Just what is in your Koolaid?
C. We celebrate peace. If a kiss can't memorialize that for you, well, sucks to be you!
"The infamous embrace starring a sailor and a nurse is an iconic image of the end of World War II." It isn't INFAMOUS, it is FAMOUS!!! The dumbing down of America continues in poorly written articles every day. Isn't there supposed to be an editor for news stories?
If NBC has editors, it must be that those positions are strictly honorary - Except for that editing of the Zimmerman 911 call.
No, they have decided to embrace the whole 'self publish' trend. Editors and proof readers would just slow down their ability to post a headline with no facts to back it up. Nice thing about a website. We can always fill in those pesky details later. And they do...all the time. But hey we got that click on the headline to show marketing....
Patriarchal messaging?
Is it the woman being kissed who is in a state of "Unconditional Surrender"?
It makes me think of all that flesh falling off those Hiroshima victims into the stainless steel medical pans.
Ah, love.
Generals at the time were estimating +100K casualties to invade Japan. The Japanese had been propagandized into believing we were animals that would be raping and murdering our way through the country. We had already encountered the kind of fanatical behavior this kind of brainwashing could induce on our island hopping campaign. In a time of war we decided a 100K of them and 0 of us was a better deal. Demonstrating the bomb to Russia was seen as an added benefit but the cost of the invasion is what really drove the decision. At least most historians contend this but then we would be biased wouldn't we.
culheath ~~~> ~~~> ~~~> In the late fifties, I visited the then new museum in Hiroshima. It displayed, in all its horror, the bombing. Then, it went on to state (Of course, I paraphrase.) that horrible as the bombing was, it actually had a bright side, because, by leading the Japanese {{{Remember, it was Japanese saying this}}} to surrender, it prevented the later GREATER carnage which would have taken place had the Allies actually landed on the beaches, ala The European Theatre, thus saving a far greater number of Japanese and Allied lives. In recent years, I have often wondered if, by now, the Japanese stuck to their guns or if they have caved into politeral correctness and tried to rewrite history. *** Would someone who has recently visited this museum enlighten me ???
Matilda, that's interesting. Wonder what it says these days. Were we still running things then or had we turned the country back over?
A surprising testament to the human spirit coming out of California.
I live in the Sarasota, FL area and we too have a version of "Unconditional Surrender" sitting on our bayfront. For the past few years it has been up it has either been derided as horrible by the art critics or great by almost everyone else. Sarasota has a series of revolving sculpture shows along its bayfront near the statue, and all I can say is everytime I drive by it the only one I ever see people taking pictures of themselves standing next to is "Unconditional Surrender". Not long ago it suffered major damage when it was hit by a car. The local newspaper held a countdown for the six months plus it took to get the statue back to the community.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I worried about the restoration and return of Sarasota's statue as well.
Not Art? There is nothing artificial or contrived about the way he's kissing her and how she's accepting that kiss. It heralds an event in time in a way that is beautifully positive. It's emotion, It's a celebration, it's excitement and relief. It's 25ft tall and only just tall enough to convey how big the end of WWII was for solders and nurses and everyone the war touched. Not Art?
The nurse who was getting kissed had no clue who this guy was. She hauled off and decked him immediately after this photograph was taken.
No, she didn't. They went their separate ways and probably had a funny story to tell their friends later.
Won't the colors fade with weathering? I do not recall ever seeing a colored statue outside.
At DIA in Denver we have a twenty foot bright blue horse with red eyes(yuck!). People wish it would fade. Fortunately the 5 years, 'no petition to remove' period has expired so hopefully it will be gone soon.
It looks like it's made from a product called 'Magic-Sculpt' ( a molding compound I've worked with on a couple of smaller outdoor 'public arts' projects ). Look for the company's website, and there should be a huge gallery of finished examples. The stuff comes in 2 resins ( a clay & the hardener ), and when combined in equal amounts........dry 'rock-hard' within about 24 hrs. It's made to stand up to the 'elements'.....A lot of fun to work with, but is best worked with in small handfuls at a time because of it's characteristics ( your hands get VERY worn out trying to mix the 2 resins together....). The stuff costs about $50-$60 for a 10 lb bucket, from what I remember. You know the huge sculpture of the baseball glove at Pac-Bell ( or At&T ) Park in SanFrancisco? That's made of 'Magic-Sculpt'. It's also used by a lot of set designers in Hollywood. Once you've covered the underlying 'frame' ( which at a handful-at-a-time, would've taken quite a few weeks/months )....it would be coated with gesso ( a primer coat )....followed by the paint. We were told to use acrylic......certain colors hold up better in the sunlight....and then the whole thing would be covered with a clearcote. One of the 'public arts' projects ( which was a fundraiser ) was peanutsonparade.com. I'm sure they still have an active website featuring some examples.
Damn, I was expecting Gene Simmons with like a twenty foot tongue. What a let down....
Sarasota FL has a copy of the statue on the bay front to distract from the beauty of the water and sailboats. It is commercialism at its worst, detracting from natural beauty to a large imposing statue. I hate it, it is not art it is a way for a so called artist to cash in on a memorable event.
Some would say the sailboats detract from the beauty of the water. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Living here I would much rather see this and know what it is rather than more of that other stuff by it. And I suppose you like the pile of red pick-up sticks at Gulfsteam and 41 over this also? Please.
Wow, NOBODY commenting here gets it. This is based on a photograph of a woman being sexually harassed by a drunken sailor who had been grabbing every woman he could get his hands on.
Yeah, in 1945 when sexual harassment was a way of life and not a PC term. It's a classic photo that captures the joy and relief of a nation at the end of the worlds largest conflict. I'm pretty sure it didn't end up in court.
Did you live through WWII .... if not ... then shut up, your showing your total lack of understanding of the times.
Yay. Another freak libber heard from. Sexual harassment my hind end. Jealous much?
If you knew my politics you'd probably call me a liberal and I countered that B.S. There are stupid people of all stripes so let's not jump to conclusions.
Aurelia,
Yes, isn't it GRAND!?
I seem to remember an interview with this lady. She said to the effect (paraphrasing) "He was very strong, but what could I do about it?"
Sexual harassment? Mildly annoying? Wonder what she was thinking (the guy obviously wasn't)?
Again, it was different time with different values and mores and the phrase 'sexual harassment' had never been uttered. Ask a women who lived at the time how even they were more tolerant of this behavior at the time. They will also tell you how doing their husbands jobs in the factories helped to give them a sense of independence and self reliance that changed their attitudes forever and helped to kick off the sexual revolution.
OK, get your references right here. This is based on a famous photo taken on V-J Day in New York City. No report of the nurse ever being sexually harassed as everyone in Times Square was celebrating.
So when you read the headline from the home page, who DIDN'T think it was about the rock band???
Yeah....already posted my disappointment....
Big difference between KISS and "the Kiss"
Thank You! WERE NOT WORTHY!
Gaudy, but, what the heck, it's in Southern California.
Like the point of it or not ..
The Statue is poorly designed and built ... looks cheap and Cartoon-like
agree with you there. Looks like a Mardi Gras float............
Many public works of art are made in mexico, because it's cheaper and it look cheap too! The Rocky Marciano statue in Brockton, MA was made in mexico also!
That's why it looks like a Pinata! Thank you. I was trying to figure that out. Actually I just thought someone left a float out after a parade. And I thought 'what's the big deal, why don't they just drive it away?' Now they can just smash it and get the candy. Simple.
When I see anything that connects with Alfred Eisenstaed's world famous photo, I think of my father & mother as they re-united after World War II. In an old military footlocker, I have a copy of the "St. Louis Post-Dispatch" and the headline for VJ-Day. Here's an interesting article about "The Times Square Kiss" [ ]
How sad a lot of these comments are so demeaning to a generation of men and woman who fought so gallently and to the families who were left behind so their son's, brother's, father's and husband's could go off to fight a war not knowing if they would ever return to see their loved ones. I was born at the end of the war and my father served honorably during the war and was very proud of his service. I would think any display honoring this period in history would be acceptable to the American public.
Some would argue that the events were too important to be 'honored' by cheesy art. I would argue that the 'artist' honored the event just by the time and effort spent regardless of the results but that doesn't really extend to displaying the results in a public place. It's all subjective. To me it looks like a parade float and kind of strikes me as insulting to the original photo. Unless it was done by the local high school in which case... it's great!
FUN FACT! After the iconic photo this statue depicts was taken the nurse slapped the servicemen. The photographer was following him around taking pictures as he grabbed and kissed random women on the street. Nice sexual assault statue San Diego!
Obviously you did not read the story.....your "FUN FACT" is more like HUGE LIE.
Don't believe everything you see on the Simpsons....
Gaudy is right. But here in SD we're not known for our fabulous sense of style....America's Funkiest City!