
Gerald Herbert / AP
Protestors from the National Audubon Institute, the Gulf Restoration Network and other organizations stand outside federal court on the first day of the Gulf oil spill settlement trial in New Orleans, Monday, Feb. 25, 2013.
BP launched its promised appeal against "fictitious" and "absurd" oil spill compensation payouts on Friday and asked a judge to temporarily halt those made on a so-called business economic loss basis.
In a New Orleans court filing, BP gave examples of businesses in industries far from the spill and unconnected with the coastline that enjoyed strengthened earnings in the spill year of 2010 and yet had received millions in spill compensation.
The British oil and gas group, which has already sold a susbtantial part of its business to pay reparations and fines for the disaster, said it could be "irreparably harmed" by the payouts without relief from the court, because they could cost it "billions" more than it budgeted for when it agreed to a settlement in April 2012.
BP was appealing a March 5 ruling, which upheld the way the compensation was being paid to business claimants wanting recompense.
The ruling, by the same U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier who presides over BP's ongoing trial on separate civil charges, reopened a part of the saga that appeared to have been settled almost a year ago when BP agreed terms on economic, property and medical compensation for more than 100,000 individuals and businesses who had filed a class action suit.
At the time of the settlement, BP estimated the bill would be $7.8 billion - already making it one of the biggest settlements of its kind in U.S. history.
The actual amount is uncapped, and dependent on decisions made by Patrick Juneau, a lawyer from Louisiana who administers the payments under a complex set of rules set out by the agreement.
As the payments started to flow out, BP realized that the funds it had set aside would be insufficient. At first, it added more, reaching $8.5 billion by the end of 2012, while complaining that the payments to businesses were too generous and the terms of the settlement were being misinterpreted.
On March 5, Judge Barbier upheld Juneau's methods.
Two days later, BP said it would appeal, and it reduced the sum earmarked for payments back to $7.7 billion to underline its disapproval.
"The BEL (Business Economic Losses) policy decisions rewrite the agreement's express terms, and contradict its purpose, plain text, and underlying principles by authorizing compensation awards for claimants seeking to recover for non-existent 'losses.'" BP's Friday filing said.
"BP did not agree to pay what is already hundreds of millions of dollars, and potentially billions, to claimants with 'losses' that do not exist in reality, but result solely from the claims administrator's rewriting of the agreement."
The April 2010 spill happened when the Macondo well ruptured and the Deepwater Horizon rig that was working on it exploded and sank. The accident killed 11 men and spouted 4 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico in the United States' worst offshore oil spill.
In its filing, among the examples BP offered of "absurd" claims, the British company referred to a $21 million payment made to a rice mill in Louisiana situated some 40 miles (64.4 kms) from the coast that earned more revenue than in spill year of 2010 than in 2007, 2008, or 2009.
It also cited a $9.7 million recompense for a highway, street and bridge construction company in northern Alabama, almost 200 miles (322 kms) from the Gulf, and which does no business in the region, and for which 2010 was its best year on record.
BP also referred to a digital printing business and a law firm that had been compensated despite strong profits.
All were unnamed.
Lawyers for the Plaintiff Steering Committee (PSC), with which BP agreed the settlement, and which is a plaintiff in the ongoing trial along with the Department of Justice, said BP had no case for appeal.
"This court has already affirmed Mr. Juneau's independent interpretation of the settlement agreement..., terms which were negotiated, co-authored and expressly agreed to by BP," said co-lead counsels Steve Herman and Jim Roy.
"Simply put, BP undervalued the settlement and underestimated the number of people and businesses that qualify under the objective formulas that BP agreed to."
Yet Internet advertisements from lawyers boast of the ease with which payments far in excess of actual losses can be obtained.
One describes the experience of a Florida bicycle retailer it represented. The shop enjoyed an increase in spill year revenue to $2.5 million from $1.9 million in 2009, and yet managed to win a payout of "almost one million dollars," the advertisement says.
Another explains how under one of the tests involved, claimants can demonstrate a loss by choosing to compare "any consecutive three months from 2010" with "a large combination of months going back to January 2007."
BP's appeal covers just one area of a raft of costs and potential costs it faces as the third anniversary of the spill approaches on April 20.
Its accounting provisions for the spill total around $42 billion - equivalent to about 30 percent of its stock market value. Almost matching that it has sold assets worth $38 billion to finance compensation, clean-ups and fines, and it has paid, or committed to pay, $37 billion. The actions have sliced $5 billion a year, or 14 percent, off its cash flow - a basic measure of its ability to make money.
Some $4 billion in criminal claims - which are capped - have been settled, and are included in the above amounts, but civil claims under the Clean Water Act covered by the trial that began in February could add another $17.5 billion.
Billions more could be piled on in economic damage claims from Gulf Coast states. A third set of claims, for natural resource damage, have yet to be quantified.
Related:
- Gulf Coast oil spill trial begins with fingers pointing at BP
- On trial for Gulf oil spill, BP faces the price of profit
- BP executive defends report on Gulf oil spill


Now the oil company knows what it feels like to be overcharged...
Good sound bite Cory19080 but weak on facts. Oil companies earn about 7% per gallon of gas; Google, Intel, Msft, etc. earn 40-60% on their services and products. Your computer uses all three of those companies products and the level of profitability is significantly more than that of any energy company.
You have an option you know: go off the grid.
Don't let the facts get in the way of your opinions.
You are correct in your percentages, however, are you required to refill your computer daily? Which do you think occurs more, buying new computers and software per household, or buying gasoline per household? The frequency of the latter is far greater, which means their profits are far greater. 7 percent a few million times a day is not chump change.
OK Cory, that is true. In your opinion what is an appropriate profit level for an oil company? Also, as with the computer data, doesn't value come into the equation? As far as your point that their profits are great, so are their sales and more importantly their expenses. These companies employ hundreds of thousands of workers and spend billions finding and refining their products; no one pays them for the dry holes. Pharma companies likewise have high profit margins. Would you disincent them to find new cures or for that matter, more oil?
Would you give your valuable labor away for less than society will pay in order to be altruistic?
There are countries in the world like most of the middle eastern countries, Cuba, Venezuela, etc. that subsidize the price of oil. Perhaps you would like to fill up there? America is based on the capitalist system, this is how we roll here.
The change in fuel prices more times do not reflect the change in price per barrel. In other words, if the oil is produced domestically, and the hard workers earn a set salary or wage, where does the money go?
I know your response:
The dependence on foreign oil is what causes the price change. If we were more domestic-reliant, we would not have the same issues.
If the workers, refineries, and insurance companies were consistent, then I would have no problem. But how is it that oil has cost more in February than in the previous June, July, and August?
Bad Petroleum (BP) is really bad
In our capitalist society there is something called supply and demand. Energy is a world market, not just a US market, therefore US price reflects the world price when it can be transported like oil. US nat gas, on the other hand, is 1/6 the price in Japan because the very expensive facilities to ship it aren't developed. Don't hear you complaining about that Cory; can't have it both ways buddy.
Or do you have a problem with the gas companies drilling in the shale turning out low cost product, too?
Pig: So don't buy from them and they'll go out of business. Problem solved.
I am simply sticking to the subject at hand.
However, I have no problem with Marcelles Shale. I believe that we need to be more domestically dependent overall. Once that is achieved, (which may or may not happen) the price could be more controllable.
But when the world market rises, do the hard workers at the refinery earn more? Are their wages increased, then decreased when world markets slows? No. So my question is, where does that money go?
BP probably thought that handing the fund distribution would save them a lot of problems.
Here's what happened instead
When BP was doing the administration, funds were distributed quickly and to anybody who asked. When the fed took it over, complaints arose because the government is always slow to pay and often doesn't pay people who deserved the help.
Now, BP is experiencing what they sought to eliminate. People filing against them for being denied.
Government is broken, yet we trust it no matter how wrong it is.
norm903, to hell with all of these polluting oil companies. What good will all of them jobs be if we have no clean air to breathe?
Greedy people suing a Greedy Oil Company. Humm what to do?
Cory: Sticking to the subject at hand and asking your question directly, when the world price of bananas goes up the banana workers do not get more or less money.. Risk and reward go to the productive class, not the people who would not lend a hand to Henny Penny when she asked for help to sow the field, plant the seed, harvest the crop, separate the wheat from the chaff, or bake the bread. Of course, you Cory and Brian were in the front of the line asking for a slice. Most people choose no risk and no reward while bemoaning their lot in life.
Greedy oil companies? That's rich.
Norm and Cory.
Speculation is now the largest single driver of gasoline pump prices.
William: To a degree your point is accurate. Be it "real" market pricing or speculation, the price varies up and down, and it is those willing to take risk that enjoy the profits or take the loss. Those dependent on others for their income take what they get. That's the American way, and ain't it great! Certainly works for those who understand our system and traditions.
What risk are they really taking, please explain when speculators have enough capital to influence the market to go one way or another despite the supply and demand.
It is so funny to hear people talk as if they are so well educated on a subject, to watch them as they befuddle the facts and prove their overall density on the matter. We always got some steelhead talking about a mere 7% earnings by oil companies on a gallon of gas. What they fail to talk about are the Hundreds of BILLIONS they make in sales for oil bi-products, plastics, big pharma, materials, housing products etc etc etc....
and lets talk about the fact that no matter what they make in small percentages, their shear volume sales, their monopoly in their field, their selfish control and continuous lack of safety standards considering their minimal return to the people for doing business on our soil and from our lands...all in all, anyone that defends the oil companies while they continue to parasitically do business at cut rate tax rates with tens of billions in government subsidies, we pay a friggin TON for their blessed business and if you do defend them, then it merely proves how totally ignorant you are. Then consider they take their offices and headquarters overseas for cheaper taxes though they found their creating foothold as USA companies, and then grow to send their factory work to other countries that pay minimal life sustaining wages far beyond fair trade ideals and human rights efforts. Consider their lack of concern for spills in other countries that kill off whole fish industries and humans in Africa without compensation, far beyond what occurred in the gulf?
The old saying certainly applies: It is bad enough you present yourself a fool, then to open your mouth and prove it to one and all beyond denying?
Your parents were republicans weren't they?
"The old saying certainly applies: It is bad enough you present yourself a fool, then to open your mouth and prove it to one and all beyond denying"
Sure does-and damn did you prove it true with you next sentence-
"Your parents were republicans weren't they"
Just because you happen to be a far-left nutcase-from the land of rainbows and unicorns-does not mean that the oil companies are always wrong- or that you are somehow superior to anyone from the Republican party
People are ripping off BP-people who lost ZERO money due to the oil spill-and YOU think that is okay?
Where do you people on the left get your morals and ethics? Because you sure as h*ll don't have any-unless you consider two wrongs making a right being moral-or ethical!
First off, I'm not a far lefty chump'. I stand firm in the middle as any true American should. Its the enslaved masses that are blindly led into being a "party" member that sell their souls to these devils we pass off as legislative leaders, this shipwrecked ship of fools we call our government.
Second, if BP is getting ripped off, its about time. Tell that piece opf hogwash BS to the families of the 11 killed on DeepWater Horizons, killed art the hands of BP and their contractors, BP at the head of the list for allowing safety regs to diminish to a point of normalcy. And leave it to a Repuke to stand behind their lords and masters in defense of big oil. Wasn't it a repug that apologized to BP for the way they were being treated at the very start of the disaster when BP was lying about the amount that was spilling from the uncapped head, and lied about how readily a new cap could be implemented and continued to lie about contractors being at fault when in all they followed suit to BPs demands and leadership and protocols? All in the name of big bucks and now they complain because the American people are getting their unjust big bucks rewards.
I am ashamed their are idiots who stand in defense of BP even now, and make idiotic excuses by saying TWO wrongs don't make a right! Do you think once during the debacle, that BP was genuinely concerned about doing right? Whoring your emotions and opinions on this out to BP in their defense is about norm for a Repuke.
Norm:
I disagree. That "risk and reward" goes to the most non-productive class. And often they can game the markets so that they can have only rewards while passing the risks off to others. But the people who play the market don't produce anything. They are non-contributors who take money out of the system.
norm903;
When any company claims to lose "billions of dollars" a year, yet posts HUNDREDS of billions dollars in actual profit -- that company is either engaging in "fuzzy math" in its accounts, or is just plain lying about "losing" so much money.
BP has been claiming to both "lose" money AND make a hefty profit AT THE SAME TIME.
Maybe the American citizens will file a lawsuit against BP for "improper" statements just after the explosion.
Uh oh.....BP is really hurting financially:
Yep, rake in BILLIONS OF DOLLARS and ONLY provide MILLIONS FOR THE CLEANUP. Just wait until the oil plumes rise from the depths of the Gulf of Mexico. Heck, the plumes are probably in the Atlantic by now.
If it waddles like a duck, and it quacks like a duck.....it is a duck. (Duck can be changed to anything you so desire......)
Quacked One: shareholder here--BP posts a net loss some quarters, profits of <5B others.
[comment was cut off] BP posts a net loss some quarters, profits of a few billion others.
Hmmmm, whaddya know, more waste, fraud, abuse and corruption in our government.
And of course, as usual, the biggest winners will be the lawyers. Funny how no one ever seems to go after the lawyers for any criminal activities, isn’t it?
I guess when you make the laws so convoluted that only the lawyers know what they wrote they get away with anything.
Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy is the largest in history, and it's also been the most lucrative one for lawyers and consultants. The defunct bank's bill: nearly $1.6 billion. That tally comes from the latest court filings that track fees and expenses as of January 31, 2012
It’s the American way.
Let's face it, our world's energy usage is dependent on "fossil fuels?" Is that a crude joke? We're running off dead dinosaurs? That's our main source of energy? Is that the stupidest thing ever? We're talking about the height of human civilization and this is what we have to show for?
Of course equally ludicrous is that, seriously...? capitalism? REALLY? A system based AND enforces the concept of greed? REALLY? That is the system in which we pride our modern civilization? And the fact nobody sees the absurdity of it all? A concept based on, "Hey man, more for me so "f" you." And of course no matter how one defends capitalism, they always overlook 1 fact - "greed." So, "if I have the ability to make more money than others, so why not?" OK, but can you do so "honestly?" That IS the question. And the answer is no, because humans suck. You know it, I know it.
At the end of the day it appears to come down to "tainted money", you know, money that "taint yours" and you want some of it. BP is getting ripped off, period, and taking steps to prevent it. The company is owned by shareholders and it wouldn't be a surprise if many of the anti-energy coalition on this board own energy shares in their 401 k, pensions, etc. What BP is doing is responsible.
The American system is based on capitalism. If you don't like how much profit a company earns you are free not to buy their products or move to Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, etc. This is not a suggestion TO move, merely pointing out your freedom of choice that our democratic, captitalistic system allows you. If you were in charge it seems we would not enjoy the same freedoms our system allows...unless it coincidentally was in alignment with your views.
Interesting note: how many of you are typing your posts on Apple computers, a company that makes more money per quarter than Exxon. Where is the outrage?
Norm:
My outrage with Apple computers is not with the fact that they make a lot of money. In fact, I don't have a problem with people making a lot of money. I just note that many of the biggest money-makers contribute nothing. And here I make no judgement on BP's specific claim.
Jeff Jared, no kidding, I think you'd like North Korea. It's one of the more equal places on earth. No opportunities for those people you don't like who want to get ahead in life.
Hello folks, is anybody buying into the BP Public Relations propaganda machine that the spill wasn't as bad as first thought and the oil has evaporated or been eaten by microbes therefore 75% of the oil is gone and there is no damage to the Gulf or its inhabitants? Nobody has gone to jail over the deaths of 11 people and and the fines aren't even close to compensating for the ecological damage that has been done.
Did you know the well is still leaking and Corexit is still being used? You will still hear the mantra by the ignorant of drill baby drill. Hey folks, we have a symbiotic relationship with mother earth and if she dies we die. But alas, the ignorant will continue to support the destruction of our planet saying we have no choice just as they will say we have no choice in attacking other countries and killing, maiming, and displacing millions of people. If you were a galactic civilization wouldn’t you quarantine this type of ignorance from the rest of the universe?
The largest marine oil spill in our history began on April 20th, 2010 and was capped on July 15th. Initial spill estimates by BP were 1,000 barrels a day. Later those estimates were adjusted to 40 to 100,000 thousand barrels a day, nobody will ever really know. So let's do the math and this is the conservative estimate. 86 days of the spill at 50,000 barrels at 42 gallons a barrel equal 180 million 600 thousand gallons that have been spilled in the Gulf. If you double that, it is probably a more accurate reflection. And since the well is still leaking we will never really know how much oil has been leaked into the gulf. Many scientists claim the gulf loop current has been broken as a result of the leak, if so, this will have a dramatic effect on the European weather. If you want evidence of the leak just talk to the residents and oil spill workers living along the gulf from Texas to Florida.
So you wonder where the oil has gone! The figures thus far don't include the Corexit dispersant poured into the Gulf which BP claims is well over a million gallons. If you use the same corrected estimated percentage of the oil spill with the Corexit that was intentionally dispersed into the Gulf, that figure is much higher, once again we will never really know the amount dispersed as it is still being used. Now where did all that oil and dispersant go? It's still in the Gulf and the dispersant is doing its job and cloaking the oil which is making it more difficult to detect. Scientific experts claim that the carcinogenic nature of Corexit causes chronic and acute health problems which kill red blood cells causing liver and kidney damage. Nalco, the manufacturer of Corexit, which is owned in part by Goldman Sachs and Blackstone, will not list all of the chemicals in Corexit as they claim proprietary privilege. The known chemicals in Corexit are Bioconcentrating in the aquatic organisms which will affect the entire food chain in the Gulf including mother earth and us. Recent reports illustrate a high rate of birth defects in the aquatic organisms in the gulf.
This doesn't even take into account the emotional and economic devastation that has been forced upon the Gulf residents. Nobody in their right mind can minimize this catastrophe, except BP, and their paid off Public Relations flunkies, because they are beholding to their board of directors and their greedy stock holders. In what I believe is an act of the most perverse propaganda by BP, people are being encouraged to bathe in and eat the byproduct of BP’s toxic stew. After all BP has been running the show and people are just collateral damage and will be used to help mitigate reparations. Please don't let them con you and the American public.
P.S. If you care about our oceans you might want to investigate The Great Pacific Garbage Patch.
I feel the energy warming my skin as I walk along the beach, I see it as the seagulls glide effortlessly through the air, I hear it as the waves crash against the coastline, and it is all free, no one owns the sun, the wind or the waves. That is not to say that certain corporations have not tried to own the rights to all energy sources though. In the 1990's Chevron lobbied our congress to get the right to the rays of the sun. Yes that's right, big oil, who claims solar energy is not viable, actually wanted to own the sun. No matter whether you had privately owned solar panels in an off-grid home, Chevron wanted you to have to pay them for every kilowatt hour produced by the rays of the sun. Why do you think Big Oil has been doing everything in it's power to slow the progress of our inevitable switch renewable energy, SO THEY CAN HAVE TIME TO FIGURE OUT A WAY TO CONTROL IT. From the very beginnings of capitalism the exploitation of natural resources was how greedy talentless thugs acquired wealth. They did not create a better widget, they did not paint a masterpiece or write a symphony, they simply took something that should have belonged to everyone on the planet, claimed it as their own and then sold it back to us at a profit. They manipulated our political system so that all competition was crushed, they used propaganda to fool the people into thinking theirs was they only way, the started wars to control the supply, they destroyed our public transportation system to control the demand, and they created turmoil in the middle east so that they could increase the price to the consumer through speculation.
It is time to cut these criminals out of the loop, too many of our children have died fighting wars to keep these vultures in control of our energy, our health is being harmed by the pollution, we have become fat and lazy, the very environment that sustains our lives is on the verge of collapse. Change your lifestlye, go off grid, use less, walk more, recycle everything. We do not need BP, or it's filthy product, to survive, in fact it is just the opposite, without us consuming their product, BP will go the way of the dinosaur.
Nice post @deprogrammer, very wise words!
Considering the embarrassing amount of fraud US citizens played on the US Government with the funds provided after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, I can only imagine the fraud being put on BP by individuals and companies seeking to make a profit where they are due nothing. The one difference is, the US Government was able to charge, try and convict those who fraudulently received and/or used the post hurricane funds, but BP has no recourse against fraudulent claims. Shame on the people who are fraudulently using the Macondo oil spill for their personal gain; and shame on the NGOs who are out picketing the court. BP stated from the beginning they would pay for all legitimate losses; making them pay for fraudulent claims is an injustice.
My thoughts exactly Virginia. I have no sympathy for BP, but right is right - no matter how much money they make.
Alabama has been inundated with legal advertisements on television by lawyers urging ANYONE no matter where located in state or what their business to call and let them file for your 'compensation'. You get used to seeing all the attorneys' ads for social security benefits, car wrecks, meso, medical malpractice, et al - but this took it to a new level. And unfortunately for the moral health of our country, I'm sure a lot of people responded.
Go to the BP Financial Site...In College we researched how much BP estimated a Barrel of Crude cost them to get out of the ground to the Open market.....Their 2012 Cost per barrel?
23.50 per barrel. Their Numbers not some activist groups findings, their report to Stock Holders...
They make market price for that 23.50 barrel as well as profit from their 7% fuel sales and Oil Based Products. They were able to gain back their "Loss " of 30+Billion in one year since the event.
Nothing but crocodile tears for them.
No Prison time for the negligible actions that lead to workers deaths either..Just a slap on the wrist for the scape goats offered up by BP.
Also the dispersant they sprayed.....
They are showing up as far north as Michigan due to the gulfs fueling of many Ohio River Valley Storms.
Known and stated to be extremely toxic, the effect of these is unknown, and may not be for years. Should they be off the hook for that damage as well?
BP has a 70% profit margin? Mortgage your house and buy BP stock!
Now make Exxon pay the people of Alaska for the damage they caused when the drunk sank the tanker Valdez. Exxon invested the money and has made a ton of bucks off it while the fishermen langush. Big oil sucks. Sucks the life blood out of the ordinary joe.
What's great about ordinary Joe is that he doesn't drive a pickup truck that runs on gas, or turn his lights on. He doesn't need big oil! Big oil just propels him from a-b, heats his house, and does all that other stuff! Other than that, big oil sucks! Down with big oil!
Any firm or individual filing a fictitious claim should be jailed. It is increasing what I pay for gas.
Jeff,
It shouldn't affect the price of gas. We are told that oil is sold on the global market at whatever the market price is. Theoretically, if Exxon is selling its oil at $25 a barrel, then BP can't expect to sell its oil for $26 a barrel just to make up for its costs.
LostFL, how do you think the eventual terms of the BP settlement will figure into the risk analysis on a new Exxon well? Do you think that Exxon will incorporate this knowledge into their downside risk? If they don't, do you think their shareholders or insurers won't?
You don't understand an efficient market.
The fact is that there are people today that are greedy and will do anything to get something for nothing. If, in fact, there are fraudulent claims by anyone, they should be punished with either jail time or a very high fine!!!
After hurricane Katrina, there were thousands of people that filed claims for relief and were not entitled. It's that entitlement syndrome!!!
Louisianna is notorious for it's criminal behavior. The fact that so much Big Easy' money was floating around waas a natural magnet for less than hones people and business' to take advantage of BP and the hype of the spill.
Bobby didn't have any trouble taking the BP money to boost his economy..
Explains how he could refuse Govt. Bailout stimulus money doesn't it....
Lie, cheat and steal seems to be the American way. Whatever happened to honesty is the best policy?
Good question...check with the big hats at bp...maybe they can tell you.
I'm rather embarrassed over the way we've treated our best ally in the world.
Greed is a disease that spreads exponentially.
I agree that ALL officious or opportunistic claims should be prosecuted under Fraud...Criminal Action does apply for those that are trying to gain from this tragedy.
People died here......
Trying to bilk unnecessary windfalls from the accident is akin to Attempts at abolishing our Bill of Rights by using unfortunate tragedy's to support it.
But on the same note..BP has made all the money back they supposedly lost.....No tears from me for having to pay valid claims. I would guess that a handful of persons will take advantage of this based on greed, which in turn will diminish a valid claim from a shrimp boat Captain who will feel the impact for years , possibly.
Just my humble opinion...
well as the saying goes what comes around goes around BP is just finally getting a taste of their own greed. As other poster have said BP will get no pity from me
I wonder if the other companies are going to get the message about cutting corners to save costs. If they don't want to pay, for stupidity, then they shouldn't be in business.
Halliburton has cut corners since the Gulf War, where our Soldiers were Electrocuted by their shoddy work.
Did you also know <Public Record>, Halliburton bought , for cash, the largest Oil Spill , environmental clean up company in the world three weeks before the spill?
AND they also were the ones who were approved to continue spraying heavy loads of toxic dispersant without Federal over-site.
Go Figure...
BP has been pretty good about doing what is necessary to restore the fishing, beaches, tourism, and give the economic support to the local businesses that were hurt by the spill. If this were a natural disaster like Katrina, I'm sure only a percentage of the problems would have been addressed. Sure there is a lot left to be accomplished in both disasters, but BP continues it's commitment and our government left whole communities behind when the campaigning stopped. If someone is trying to take funds illegally, it robs from those that deserve the help. If this is just cost containment then shame on BP.
Yes, there are tons of people getting BP money that were not hurt by the spill. But, most are not doing it fraudulently.
Early on, BP set up a process that was subjective, and subject to the whims of the claims administrator. That left people in identical situations with completely different results.
BP then agreed to an objective test for the payout that removes all common sense from the equation. I'm having a hard time finding the real villain here...is it BP, for not sticking to its agreement? Maybe it's the people who know they weren't hurt by the spill trying to get compensated?
Did the USA get any money from the Mexican oil company whose well blowout in the Gulf was known as "Ixtoc I" an oil spill comparable to the recent Macondo spill ? Short memory?
Billions of easy $$ ? What has this to do with the actual people who made bad decisions leading up to the spills? Do any still work at BP?
Yeah and who had the cap contract for that one too? Research...Halliburton.....They will never pay for a foreign oil disaster....
They have been dodging fines their whole existence...
Read about the fines they have dodged in Texas alone. 1 year 214 violations of release of dangerous toxins..
Not one cent paid..
Not one day in court.
All suits just upheld and suspended by good ole Boys on the Texas Bench.......
So if we cannot get them to accept responsibility here...
How can we get them to accept responsibility in Mexico, Africa or Australia, all areas where they have been found negligent resulting in spills....
I guess if you cant see them from my house it is o.k. to kill the planet....
You made the mess, and are liable.
Cannot pay the damages?
Bankruptcy court is next door, fellow.
i feel so sorry for bp for the money they need to pay they must feel the same way as we do every time we need to get gas how much money do they f uck us out of ever year at the pumps so f uck you bp, pay for your crap like you make us pay
BP stepped up and paid VALID CLAIMS from almost day 1, unlike EXXON. And the guilt for this spill should fall on many shoulders. Halliburton was certainly involved.
It would have been cheaper for them to have kept up on maintenance before the spill. There is a price for neglect.
You experts are embarressing yourselves................fraud is fraud....
Yes, BP caused a HUGE disaster here, but I don't blame them for questioning FALSE claims. There are those who will take advantage of this situation. They are just as guilty as BP and should be prosecuted.
Yeah, you're right, there are some out there that will try to make a quick buck. That's just as much a crime.
The cheats should be prosecuted, made to return the money in addition to huge fines. There is no excuse for claiming money that they are not entitled to receive. It is typical of many Americans today: sue, sue, sue!
You'll always get these southern turds looking for something for nothing.... @!$%# they'd all try suing Nike for Carpel Tunnel Syndrome if they could!!!!
BP could cut back on their lying adds that play constantly on TV about what a great job they did.
Should save a couple 100 Million Dollars
All things considered, they did a good job by immediately providing help to those who REALLY were affected by the spill. All the fake claims should be tossed out. Greedy bastards!
All things considered, they did a good job by immediately providing help to those who REALLY were affected by the spill. All the fake claims should be tossed out. Greedy creeps!
Seems when O'Bama jawboned BP into coughing up $billions quickly before courts could move, and cutting its dividend he made some kind of promise that he wasn't going to try to bankrupt the company. Is that promise out the door now? Is this just unlimited extortion?
Its the American way! Sue for everything you can possibly imagine even when there is no loss or injury. Our legal and justice systems thrive on it.
Agree.
BP are ( as the Brits would say ) pikers. They're actually paying people, fer chrissake. Compare them with our homegrown Exxon, who paid pennies on the dollar for the Exxon Valdez disaster, basically getting off scott-free.
To Starvin Larry who commented:
People are ripping off BP-people who lost ZERO money due to the oil spill-and YOU think that is okay?
Where do you people on the left get your morals and ethics? Because you sure as h*ll don't have any-unless you consider two wrongs making a right being moral-or ethical
I am not a fan of BP, but the greedy are coming out of the woodwork to make false claims that they are not entitled to. This happens frequently in major disasters, e.g. Katrina and others where the creeps believe they have a chance to rip off corporations because "they have the money." It is not only unethical, it is illegal and in this case I hope BP shoots down all of the phony claims; and the courts should go after those who make false claims.