Terror suspect who allegedly plotted with al Qaeda to kill Americans overseas charged in NYC

A 43-year-old man from Saudi Arabia has been indicted in federal court in Brooklyn and will stand trial on charges that he plotted to kill U.S. military personnel in Afghanistan and U.S. diplomats in Nigeria, prosecutors said Wednesday afternoon.

But federal officials say he has been in the U.S. since last fall and has been cooperating with investigators.

Ibrahim Suleiman Adnan Adam Harun, who allegedly uses the alias “Spin Ghul,” is accused of al Qaeda-related activities going back to 2001.

Prosecutors say Huran went from Saudi Arabia to Afghanistan with the intent to wage violent jihad.  He arrived in Afghanistan shortly before the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, the feds say, and then joined al Qaeda, receiving military training.

Investigators say the suspect fought against U.S. coalition forces in Afghanistan with an al Qaeda fighting group based in Pakistan.  "He was in firefights with U.S. soldiers," one official told NBC News.

Harun is accused of trying to kill U.S. military personnel in Afghanistan between 2002 and 2003. From there, prosecutors say he went to Africa with the intent to carry out attacks on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Nigeria.

Justice Department officials say he was arrested in Libya in 2005 and confined there until 2011, when the in-flux Libyan government released him. 

Authorities in Italy arrested him after was accused of assaulting officers on a refugee ship.  The U.S. filed charges against him a year ago and sought extradition.  He was taken to the U.S. last October, where he's been ever since.

"Whether they try to attack our servicemen on the battlefield or scheme to kill our diplomats and citizens in embassies abroad, terrorists will find no refuge," U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch said in a statement Wednesday. "The United States will use every tool at our disposal to protect our nation’s security and stop terrorist attacks before they happen.”

Only today did the government make the case public, a sure sign that he was been cooperating ever since. 

Harun is the latest al Qaeda-linked figure to be sent to New York City for civilian trial.  

Earlier this month, Sulaiman Abu Gaith, a son-in-law and spokesman for Osama bin Laden, was brought to New York for trial on terror-related charges. He was sent to the city despite objection from some congressional Republicans who believe terrorists should be held in military custody at Guantanamo Bay.

Andrew Rafferty contributed to this report

Discuss this post

Funny how so many of these top brass AQ members are from our "allay" SAUDI ARABIA.

  • 11 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:52 PM EDT

Glad to see them in the hands of our great Fed Prosecutors, who are getting MANY MANY more convictions than the so-called military tribunals, which are a mess.

.

FORWARD! :-)

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:57 PM EDT

I am so sure the Feds read him his Miranda Rights.

There is an old saying in Saudi Arabia......"Watch your back, your "friend" is more than likely your enemy".

Obama: going backward.

  • 6 votes
#1.2 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:04 PM EDT

Ido--100% conviction rate by Fed courts. For Gitmo, 5 plea bargains and two overturned convictions. I think sticking with the Fed court is a better choice. I'm sure he was read his Miranda rights...and is cooperating, from the report. More than one would expect in Gitmo.

  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:12 PM EDT

Wood - plus, it costs less than $30,000 per year to house an inmate in the Federal prison system, compared to $800,000 in Guantanamo. And these guys are more secure locked down on US soil, compared to on a hostile country like Cuba.

  • 4 votes
#1.4 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:30 PM EDT

Saudi Arab theology is we are infidels

  • 2 votes
#1.5 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:40 PM EDT

Woodbutcher, Would you believe any of the intel this POS gave up? I have no idea where "madone" gets $800K a year per person in Guantanamo? Cuba is not hostile, Castro's regime is. If New Yorker's are OK with this POS being tried in their city then I'm OK with it too. They've paid the price so they can make that decision,and I to this day stand behind them. As an American I think that keeping the enemy of our great country offshore is the way to go. Because they do not deserve the right to walk on our soil or breath our air for that matter. I hear that there are 24 hunger strikes in Gitmo now. That my friends is really good news!

  • 1 vote
#1.6 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:05 PM EDT

Oh yeah! Great to have him in New York. It will be a 40 million dollar bureautic, attorney fest. The POS should be stuck on GB for the remainder of his life. Why stink up a U.S. City just to make a political point.

  • 2 votes
#1.7 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:33 PM EDT

They said he was cooperating, so what the S O B has been here since 2001. ploting with all of them. I wouldent be suprised if the saudies were involvef in the hole thing to begin with. Solution close the borders. ship all them back including the mex. so we all can go back to work

    #1.8 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:41 PM EDT

    I wouldent be suprised if the saudies were involvef i

    You do know that over half the attackers were Saudi, right? This is why so many of us thought bush/cheney were full of crap to attack Iraq ( oh but wait they had oil in Iraq)

      #1.9 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:49 AM EDT
      Reply

      Yes another Saudi - If you put 1000 in a room , you would need to travel to another building to locate someone who you could Trust- these people are Experts at Lying .

      • 1 vote
      Reply#2 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 5:42 PM EDT

      Yet another muslim who wants to kill in the name of islam. But I am always told that islam is a peaceful ideology. What gives??

      • 5 votes
      Reply#3 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:09 PM EDT

      And the talking heads of the Republican party will be seen swooning, spinning around like the exorcist movie, and yelling fear fear fear from the rooftops, with promises of Armageddon, at the possibility of the accused terrorist having representation in New York, instead of a military kangaroo court!

      Since when should Americans be afraid of a justice system that convicts the majority of convicts from minorities and has never failed to convict a terrorist yet? If anything, Americans should be applauding the fact that at least one person will be getting a fair trial, while all of our minorities get the shaft!

      If there is any doubt of a conviction being obtained, then why do you live here? If you are trolling for the rich elitists who can buy their way out of jail with infinite funding, then why aren't you up in arms about the U.S. Justice system bringing charges of treason against George Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld, for purposefully lying us into a war, killing thousands of Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians over the false premise of weapons of mass destruction we all know there was no proof of existence? That was treason!

      Outing a CIA operative is treason! And furthermore, we should be really pissed that these same Republican leaders failed to pre-fund the Veterans administration when the wounded came streaming in! Sick f***s!

      And now these same sickos try to re-write history and tell us the goal was to free the Iraqi civilians! Pardon me while I puke! The lack of planning left Iraq more aligned with Iran than it was before we invaded! Nothing wrong there, eh? Should we blame that on Obama, too?

      Do you see why Americans don't trust the words that spew from Republican leaders? Should we be surprised that George Bush gives seminars in the Caymans on how to shelter profits in the Islands to keep from paying the U.S. taxes that could help America? He did that one week prior to the Romney/Obama election! Now you may leave the room with your tails between your legs, you dogs! Nothing but handmaidens to the rich!

      Blaming the poor for the lack of jobs that today, Republicans unanimously blocked an infrastructure bill again, that could have put a million back to work! There is no excuse for Republicans! Debauchery is the only term that is applicable to them! And still not one loophole they are willing to mention they would be willing to close to help our economy pay for the trillions in war debt they left behind!

      • 6 votes
      Reply#4 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:20 PM EDT

      Plenty of blame to go all around. What do you think may have been in the convoys that went into Syria on the eve of the 2nd Iraq conflict. Could it have been WMD that had been provided by another regime and were sneaked out of the country; and maybe being used even now in ASAD.land? Sadam Hussein was an extremely devious and cruel individual with sons that were well schooled in the intracies of being a tyrant. He used chemical weapons against anyone who dared defy his regime. You can be safe in the belief he would have used them again except for the fact he didn't have the opportunity without being erased from the picture. Try using a little intellect and sense instead of the liberal vitrol which is prevalent in these blogs. Have you paid attention to the enormous amounts of money spent by this Administration? Those wasted dollars have made it impossible to spend the huge amount needed to upgrade the infrastructure. Federal spending creates waste in its finest from. Does the "Green Energy" debacle bounce around in your mind per chance?

      • 2 votes
      #4.1 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:46 AM EDT
      Reply

      What ?!?!?!!??! He was tried and we didn't get attacked? OMG! GOPhers check it out!

        Reply#5 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:29 PM EDT

        Saudi Arabia has lots of oil.. Maybe since they are such azz-wipes we should attack them.... Opps!...I forgot that the Bushes are in love with them.... Oh!... I mean in bed with them.

          Reply#6 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:07 PM EDT

          So this guy came from the country where ALL the 911 Terrorists came from. SAUDIA ARABIA. Thats Why George Bush ordered that Iraq be attacked because the terrorists came from saudia arabia and he wanted to take the heat off of them. Good thinking George. Of course it cost us Billons upon Billions of dollars and thousands of our soldiers lives wasted but who cares, right George Bush. Mission Accomplished. Daddy Bush must be so proud of you.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#7 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:12 PM EDT

          Tarzan,

          No soldiers life has ever been wasted, you moron, go swing on your vine. They fought to protect their Country so that you can spew your bullshi!.

          • 2 votes
          #7.1 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:36 PM EDT

          Iraq was a waste of time, money and human lives. Ten years later, the right wing is still trying to justify it.

          • 3 votes
          #7.2 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:39 PM EDT

          Dave: Protect our country? From who? we weren't attacked by Iraq. We were attacked by Saudia Arabia. Thats where ALL the terrorists came from. And yes those lives were in vain I'm sorry to say. Seems like they blew smoke in your ear and you believed every word they told you. Look at Iraq today, still blowing each other up. Seems YOU are the moron pal. A stupid one at that.

            #7.3 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:04 PM EDT

            Tarzan is right (except, I don't condone insults at each other on the forum! That is stupid, regardless of who's right). SacredFire is correct. Dave D-1046643, tone down your name-calling, and open your eyes to the dirty politics that we, the peons are lead by.

            • 1 vote
            #7.4 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:01 PM EDT

            DaveD their lives were wasted over a lie. Explain why Cheney got $8 million for his Halliburton shares, can you say "conflcit of interest"?

              #7.5 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:51 AM EDT
              Reply

              This slimeball should be in Guantanamo Bay with all the other human feces. Holder and Obama brought him to the U.S. for political reasons and political reasons only. If something bad happens in New York, as a result of this, it will be on Obama and Holders heads. Idiots!

              • 3 votes
              Reply#8 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:23 PM EDT

              Yeah Dave, something did happen and it was called 9/11! They should be tried in federal civilian court. Guantanamo is a sham. Attack our country and we'll try you and convict you where it happened, not in some Cuban country club prison...

              • 1 vote
              #8.1 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:38 PM EDT

              Just because Bush and Chaney sent them to GITMO doesn't make it right. The terroist committed crimes against american soil and they should be tried on american soil. This country is sick and fed up with the errors Bush and Chaney have cost us in lives and debt, Bush is so ashame he will not come out in public. They didn't even show up for the RNC. Both are loosers and liars.

              • 1 vote
              #8.2 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:50 PM EDT

              What's wrong with giving them trail in this country?

                #8.3 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:20 PM EDT
                Reply

                Much thanks to the Obama Administration for capturing these terroist thugs and bringing them to justice. It's a dispictable shame that Bush and Chaney wasted 8 years with no avail. They were trying to do a man's job with a child's mine. Hats off to you Mr Commander-n-Chief. Wish there was a Constitutional Ammendment for us to keep you a third term.

                • 4 votes
                Reply#9 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:39 PM EDT

                dmill

                You have a very narrow view of the world. You see only what Obama tells you that you saw.

                • 3 votes
                #9.1 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 7:59 PM EDT

                dmill,

                Why not? He's already desecrated everything the U.S. Constitution stands for.

                Wait til your Obama Care costs kick in and your taxes skyrocket, then we'll see how far

                your dopey love fest goes.

                • 2 votes
                #9.2 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:00 PM EDT

                I'm trying to fathom exactly what the republicans amended and passed into law healthcare bill has to do with actually trying these criminals for crimes against this nation? Every single prisoner being held for crimes against the U.S. should be tried on U.S. soil and even if they were, it still would not close down Guantanamo Bay as the majority of the prisoners crimes were not committed against american soil but for crimes committed on foreign soil in the name of the Taliban or Al-Quaida or some branch of another foreign terrorist group.

                • 2 votes
                #9.3 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:19 PM EDT

                dmill-3826165,

                So you are condoning the Afghanistan Military/CIA ESCALATION by Obama???

                Just a little history -

                George Bush & the UK turned the Afghanistan 'Nation Building' over to the UN and 52+other countries, Dec 2001...

                72% of the Afghanistan US Troop deaths have occurred during Obama's rein...

                The most effective tool against World Terrorism has been coordinated POLICE action and immigration controls...

                  #9.4 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:38 AM EDT
                  Reply

                  Finally....charged! Now, throw the shoes......book at him!

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#10 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:20 PM EDT

                  Arabs, Christians and Jews do NOT mix. Oh, but these guys, the muslems are NOT our enemies,.....so what in the hell do our enemies do?................Kill 'em.

                    Reply#11 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:42 PM EDT

                    Never trust a Muslim car salesman. Oh wait non of them. Screw the Saudia's, and drill here. Oh wait one more time, it just might put a few people back to work, and off of welfare. As long as they are not Illegals.

                      Reply#12 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:00 PM EDT

                      No Dave D they fought so the 1% can make money. The war was a lie!!!!!!

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#13 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:20 PM EDT

                      How dare you desecrate a "holy" moosshlam? I will now put a 7th century Fatwa on you and now every mooslem under the age of 16 will blow you up! Wait, they already do that anyway in their enlightened "madrassas"...Instead, I will throw Acid in your face, marry your 8 yr old sister, ban music, dancing, "western education" and put your women in a Burka! We don't care about reasoning, truth, education and the 21st century! We want it to be the 7th century again so our pediphile leader will destroy anything he see's and we can yell Alaha Akbar while killing anyone who is an Infidel!!! O yes, Islam is the way-submit to the world's most disgusting cult around and kill because that's the way it says to do in the Koran....

                        Reply#14 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:22 PM EDT

                        Or you could just bomb churches in the South....or kill your neighbor because he lives on the wrong side of the street.

                          #14.1 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:08 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          And just why was he taken to civil court in NYC? He should be in Gitmo for a military tribunal. Tried convicted and killed by a drone if it doesn't crash. Just to try the presidents next move. He's been very cooperative since being brought to the US. Wow what a surprise he may spend a couple of years in (prison) daycamp, with 3 sq meals, cable tv, which our government will be more then happy to spend. And released back into the wild. Our government sucks.

                            Reply#15 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:27 PM EDT

                            What type of government do you prefer? PS. 100% conviction rate in Fed court, all convicted serving sentences in max security.

                            • 1 vote
                            #15.1 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:05 PM EDT
                            Reply

                            Obama has refurbished Guantanamo detention once, now they are doing it once more.

                            These ass holes should have been sent there.

                            WHY are we bringing them to the mainland?

                              Reply#16 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:57 PM EDT

                              100% conviction rate in Fed court, 5 plea bargains and two overturned convictions at Gitmo. WHY do conservatives want him at Gitmo?

                              • 1 vote
                              #16.1 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:04 PM EDT

                              Conservatives want terrorists in Gitmo because that is what Dubya wanted, regardless of how unsuccessful military trials have been thus far. In their minds.....Obama = Bad, Dubya = Good. Facts be damned!!

                              • 1 vote
                              #16.2 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:23 AM EDT

                              The 9/11 terrorists SHOULD be tried in NYC, where the crime was committed, but conservatives were actually "scared" of these guys! But as we can see now trying them here won't get us attacked! They're all full of shiite.....

                                #16.3 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:57 AM EDT

                                Ummmm, cuz they attacked us "here", Viewer moron.

                                  #16.4 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:58 AM EDT
                                  Reply

                                  Why don't we adopt the way's of trials from the country were the accused are from? Like Stone throwing the D*CKHEAD to death. Or Cutting off his hands? Then fly him back home and throw his ass out of the plane at 30,000 feet off the deck.

                                  • 2 votes
                                  Reply#17 - Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:33 PM EDT

                                  He was sent to the city despite objection from some congressional Republicans who believe terrorists should be held in military custody at Guantanamo Bay.

                                  i think why ''''of the double standard "", if you dont remember , will thats all i will say , its up to them , , but i agree they should not be tried here,

                                  and you would see in time why , and it was before done to us citizen a long time ago,

                                  i cant member who but i do kind of remember some thing on this long time ago,

                                  i think they even made a movie on it ,

                                  i might be wrong just cant member right now,

                                    Reply#18 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:24 AM EDT

                                    Juan Lopez

                                    Why don't we adopt the way's of trials from the country were the accused are from? Like Stone throwing the D*CKHEAD to death. Or Cutting off his hands? Then fly him back home and throw his ass out of the plane at 30,000 feet off the deck.

                                    haha i think you said it the best , lmao

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#19 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 12:27 AM EDT

                                    Some useful reminders about some of the truths of the Iraq War by Naval War College professor of national security affairs Stephen Knott, that seem to have been forgotten by a majority of the people posting here : http:// online.wsj.com/article/...

                                    "At 5:34 a.m. on March 20, 2003, American, British and other allied
                                    forces invaded Iraq. One of the most divisive conflicts in the nation’s
                                    history would soon be labeled “Bush’s War.”

                                    The overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s regime became official U.S. policy
                                    in 1998, when President Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Act—a bill
                                    passed 360-38 by the House of Representatives and by unanimous consent
                                    in the Senate. The law called for training and equipping Iraqi
                                    dissidents to overthrow Saddam and suggested that the United Nations
                                    establish a war-crimes tribunal for the dictator and his lieutenants.

                                    The legislation was partly the result of frustration over the
                                    undeclared and relatively unheralded “No-Fly Zone War” that had been
                                    waged since 1991. Saddam’s military repeatedly fired on U.S. and allied
                                    aircraft that were attempting to prevent his regime from destroying
                                    Iraqi opposition forces in northern and southern Iraq.

                                    According to former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Hugh Shelton, in
                                    1997 a key member of President Bill Clinton’s cabinet (thought by most
                                    observers to have been Secretary of State Madeleine Albright) asked Gen.
                                    Shelton whether he could arrange for a U.S. aircraft to fly slowly and
                                    low enough that it would be shot down, thereby paving the way for an
                                    American effort to topple Saddam. Kenneth Pollack, a member of Mr.
                                    Clinton’s National Security Council staff, would later write in 2002
                                    that it was a question of “not whether but when” the U.S. would invade
                                    Iraq. He wrote that the threat presented by Saddam was “no less pressing
                                    than those we faced in 1941.”

                                    Radicalized by the events of 9/11, George W. Bush gradually concluded
                                    that a regime that had used chemical weapons against its own people and
                                    poison gas against Iran, invaded Iran and Kuwait, harbored some of the
                                    world’s most notorious terrorists, made lucrative payments to the
                                    families of suicide bombers, fired on American aircraft almost daily,
                                    and defied years of U.N. resolutions regarding weapons of mass
                                    destruction was a problem. The former chief U.N. weapons inspector, an
                                    Australian named Richard Butler, testified in July 2002 that “it is
                                    essential to recognize that the claim made by Saddam’s representatives,
                                    that Iraq has no WMD, is false.”

                                    In the U.S., there was a bipartisan consensus
                                    that Saddam possessed and continued to develop WMD. Former Vice
                                    President Al Gore noted in September 2002 that Saddam had “stored secret
                                    supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
                                    Then-Sen. Hillary Clinton observed that Saddam hoped to increase his
                                    supply of chemical and biological weapons and to “develop nuclear
                                    weapons.” Then-Sen. John Kerry claimed that “a deadly arsenal of weapons
                                    of mass destruction in his [Saddam's] hands is a real and grave threat
                                    to our security.”

                                    Even those opposed to using force against Iraq
                                    acknowledged that, as then-Sen. Edward Kennedy put it, “we have known
                                    for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing” WMD. When
                                    it came time to vote on the authorization for the use of force against
                                    Iraq, 81 Democrats in the House voted yes, joined by 29 Democrats in the
                                    Senate, including the party’s 2004 standard bearers, John Kerry and
                                    John Edwards, plus Majority Leader Tom Daschle, Sen. Joe Biden, Mrs.
                                    Clinton, and Sens. Harry Reid, Tom Harkin, Chris Dodd and Jay
                                    Rockefeller. The latter, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
                                    claimed that Saddam would “likely have nuclear weapons within the next
                                    five years.”

                                    Support for the war extended far beyond Capitol
                                    Hill. In March 2003, a Pew Research Center poll indicated that 72% of
                                    the American public supported President Bush’s decision to use force.

                                    If Mr. Bush “lied,” as the common accusation
                                    has it, then so did many prominent Democrats—and so did the French,
                                    whose foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin, claimed in February 2003
                                    that “regarding the chemical domain, we have evidence of [Iraq's]
                                    capacity to produce VX and yperite [mustard gas]; in the biological
                                    domain, the evidence suggests the possible possession of significant
                                    stocks of anthrax and botulism toxin.” Germany’s intelligence chief
                                    August Hanning noted in March 2002 that “it is our estimate that Iraq
                                    will have an atomic bomb in three years.”

                                    According to interrogations conducted after the
                                    invasion, Saddam’s own generals believed that he had WMD and expected
                                    him to use these weapons as the invasion force neared Baghdad.

                                    The war in Iraq was authorized by a bipartisan
                                    congressional coalition, supported by prominent media voices and backed
                                    by the public. Yet on its 10th anniversary Americans will be told of the
                                    Bush administration’s duplicity in leading us into the conflict. Many
                                    members of the bipartisan coalition that committed the U.S. to invade
                                    Iraq 10 years ago have long since washed their hands of their share of
                                    responsibility.

                                    We owe it to history—and, more important, to all those who died—to recognize that this wasn’t Bush’s war, it was America’s war."

                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#20 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:32 AM EDT

                                    “stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”

                                    Yeah but bush led this country to be it was something that would come in the form of a "mushroom cloud" That's what he said when trying top make the case for a war. And why would you GOPhers listen to a liar like Clinton? Hint: it was something that lied underground, rhymes with boil.....

                                      #20.1 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:55 AM EDT

                                      Terri-2006096,

                                      The USA shipped 550+tones of 'Yellow Cake' to Canada, that Iraq had sold them in 2008...

                                      reference - www. nbcnews.com/id/25546334/dtd - 5 Jul 2008

                                      Was Saddam processing it and designing triggers to set off a nuke??? His captured scientist said they were and Saddam was publicly announcing he was. Though the IAEA conducted their last inspection on Mar 2003 and found NO active nuclear sites or valid procurement of additional nuclear equipment/material...

                                      Hind-Sight is always 20/20...

                                      But the Chem, Bio & Nerve agents were there and had been used. And thousands of US service members are still suffering from their effects...

                                        #20.2 - Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:36 AM EDT
                                        Reply

                                        Well Juan..America is not as Savage as these people and the countries they come from..but if we where to employ your ideas, maybe they would think twice about screwing with us. Hell Juan I say your right...you got my vote.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#21 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 2:39 AM EDT

                                        Wow, just WOW! The lap dogs are going crazy, they are actually going to try a terrorist in NYC. They don't know why that shouldn't happen, just that their masters have told them to complain. That's what happens when you have a bunch of low informed base poodles running around.

                                        Get a clue, it's cheaper to try them in federal court. And you are the ones complaining about the money being spent. Which one do you want, you can't have both. Less spending, or Gitmo? If it's less spending, then you lap dogs quit complaining about the trillions being spent. Leave that to the adults to complain, not the little poodles.

                                          Reply#22 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 8:54 AM EDT

                                          "but federal officials say he has been in the U.S. since last fall and has been cooperating with investigators". So this means when the trial is over he will what, get a slap on the wrist and his own taxi to drive around in NYC?

                                            Reply#23 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 9:37 AM EDT

                                            Hmmmm, I see al-Queda still hasn't attacked us yet! All that fear mongering form the right, just the usual crap. Rep. King, suck it.....

                                              Reply#24 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 11:52 AM EDT
                                              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.