Patrick Semansky / AP file

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning steps out of a security vehicle as he is escorted into a courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., on Nov. 29, 2012, for a pretrial hearing.

FORT MEADE, Md. – A military judge on Thursday accepted guilty pleas by  Army Pfc. Bradley Manning to 10 lesser charges against him, leaving the ex-intelligence analyst to face 12 other counts for allegedly leaking hundreds of thousands of government documents to the WikiLeaks website. 

The acceptance of the "naked guilty pleas" -- meaning there is no agreement between the government and the defense that would limit the sentence – at a pre-trial hearing means that Manning faces up to 20 years in prison, even if he is ultimately acquitted of the most-serious charges against him. 

Col. Denise Lind, the military judge presiding over the case, also accepted Manning’s “not guilty” pleas to the remaining charges, including "aiding the enemy." His court martial on those charges, which carry a maximum sentence of life in prison, is scheduled to begin on June 3. 

During the day-long pre-trial hearing, Manning acknowledged that his actions were a discredit to the service and that he knew WikiLeaks was not authorized to have the information he provided. 

At one point when Lind asked him whether he knew what he was doing was wrong, he answered simply, "Yes, your honor."

More than an hour of Thursday's hearing was consumed by Manning's composed reading of a 35-page prepared statement that offered his first public explanation of his motives for leaking the government documents to WikiLeaks. He said he did so to “spark domestic debate” on foreign policy and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Manning painted himself as a young man with an "insatiable thirst for geopolitical information" and a desire for the world to know the truth about what was happening in Iraq and Afghanistan. But he said he became increasingly disillusioned after being sent to Iraq by actions that "didn't seem characteristic" of the U.S., the leader of free world.

Manning said under oath that the first documents he sent to WikiLeaks in early 2012 were the combined information data network exchanges for Iraq and Afghanistan, which he described as the daily journals of the "on-the-ground reality" of the conflicts in Iran and Afghanistan. 

He said he sent the information while on leave and staying at his aunt's house in Potomac, Md., using a public computer at a Barnes & Noble store in Rockville or North Bethesda. He said included a brief note calling the information the most significant documents of our time, and closing with, "Have a good day." 

He said he tried to send the information to the Washington Post and the New York Times before turning to WikiLeaks.  He said he later sent information to WikiLeaks eight other times from his personal laptop at Contingency Base Hammer in Iraq. 

Manning is facing 22 criminal charges that include "aiding the enemy" and could face a life sentence if convicted of the most serious charges. 

Manning said he decided to release the first batch information because he was depressed and frustrated, and felt "a sense of relief" when he returned to Iraq. He said he finally had a "clear conscience" because someone else knew what was happening. 

His most detailed explanation involved the release of aerial weapons team video showing airstrikes that killed some Iraqi civilians and several Reuters journalists.

“It was troubling to me" that the U.S. military in Iraq wouldn't release the video, he said. Also disturbing was the "seemingly delightful blood lust" exhibited when members of the air crew referred to the civilians as "dead bastards" and congratulated one another on their ability to kill large numbers of people. He said he was encouraged by the public response, that others were "as troubled" as he was.

In addition to the charge of aiding the enemy, Manning pleaded not guilty to counts alleging theft of U.S documents or videos -- including allegations that he stole the list of all of the emails and phone numbers of U.S. military and personnel in Iraq at the time -- unauthorized access of that information and downloading unauthorized software onto government computers.

The charges to which he pleaded guilty included intentionally causing intelligence information to be published on the Internet, improper handling of classified information and counts of conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline.

Specifically, Manning acknowledged that he had unauthorized possession of information, that he willfully communicated it, and that he communicated it to an unauthorized person. However, he only acknowledged that for nine specific files or pieces of information, including: 

• Combat engagement video of a helicopter gunship;
• Two Army intelligence agency memos;
• Certain records of the combined information data network exchange Iraq (which tracks all significant acts and patrol reports);
• Combined information data network exchange Afghanistan records;
• Some SOUTHCOM files dealing with Guantanamo Bay;
• An investigation into an incident in a village in Farah, Afghanistan; 
• Some Department of State cables.

Related story: WikiLeaks case: Bradley Manning seeks first public statement on motive

At his court martial, Manning’s defense is expected to argue that he considered himself a "whistleblower" and released the documents with "no malicious intent" or the intent to do "any harm to anyone." The government contends the release of the documents put some lives at risks, including the names of Afghans who were working with the U.S. military and intelligence.

Jim Miklaszewski is NBC News’ Chief Pentagon Correspondent and Courtney Kube is NBC News’ National Security Producer.  

This story was originally published on Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:00 AM EST

Jim Watson / AFP - Getty Images file

Pfc.Bradley Manning is escorted by military police as he departs the courtroom at Fort Meade, Maryland on April 25, 2012.

A military judge denied a motion to dismiss charges against Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, who is accused of providing reams of classified documents to WikiLeaks, but agreed that Manning should have a 112-day reduction from his sentence, if convicted, due to mistreatment during confinement.

Col. Denise Lind, who made the announcement during a four-day pretrial hearing that started Tuesday at Fort Meade, Md., said that Manning's confinement at a military jail in Quantico, Va., was "more rigorous than necessary," and "became excessive in relation to legitimate government interests."

Even so, Lind said dismissal of charges is "not appropriate," and would make sense only in the case of "outrageous" conduct on behalf of Manning's jailers.

Manning faces 22 charges, including aiding the enemy, which carries a maximum of life behind bars.

His defense attorney David Coombs argued that the military held the 25-year-old intelligence analyst in unduly punishing pretrial conditions for nine months after his 2010 arrest.

A 28-page motion filed in August said Manning was locked up alone in a small cell for nearly nine months at Quantico and forced to sleep naked for several nights — treatment his lawyers say constituted illegal punishment.

The document said Quantico officials operated in a culture where "anything goes" and "nobody is held to account for their conduct," willfully ignoring the advice of medical professionals who did not support the solitary confinement.

Jailers at the Marine Corps brig in Quantico testified that they considered Manning a suicide risk and that they were only trying to keep him from hurting himself and others by keeping him in a windowless, 6-by-8-foot cell for 23 hours a day.

In December, prosecutors conceded that Manning was improperly held on suicide watch for seven days and recommended he get seven days' credit at sentencing.

Bradley Manning heads to court to argue against trial in Wikileaks case

Manning has been held in pre-trial detention since May 29, 2010.

The judge's rejection of the motion to throw out the charges had been expected by legal observers.

Do motives matter?
This week's pretrial hearing includes arguments on whether Manning's motivation matters.

Prosecutors want the judge to bar the defense from producing evidence at Manning's March 6 trial regarding his motive for allegedly leaking hundreds of thousands of secret war logs and diplomatic cables. They say motive is irrelevant to whether he leaked intelligence, knowing it could be seen by al-Qaeda.

Manning allegedly told an online confidant-turned-informant that he leaked the material because "I want people to see the truth" and "information should be free."

Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

Attorney Coombs said Tuesday that barring such evidence would cripple the defense's ability to argue that Manning leaked only information that he believed could not hurt the United States or help a hostile power.

Manning has offered to take responsibility for the leaks in a pending plea offer but he still could face trial on charges that include aiding the enemy.

The Associated Press and NBC News' Kari Huus contributed to this report.

More content from NBCNews.com:

• Conn. politician apologizes after saying Giffords should 'stay out of my towns'
• 'Please save us': Teens feared to have fallen through lake ice
• Cops: Fingernail DNA helps catch woman's killer 28 years later
• Teen in crude video about alleged Ohio rape not involved, lawyer says
• New survey helps US companies prove their 'vet friendly' claims

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Jim Watson / AFP - Getty Images

Pfc. Bradley Manning is escorted by military police departing the courtroom at Fort Meade, Md., in April. The U.S. Army private is accused of passing classified documents to secret-spilling WikiLeaks,

Updated at 10 p.m. ET: The defense team for Private First Class Bradley Manning — charged in the biggest security breach in U.S. history — invoked the soldier’s excitement about March Madness and questioned a Marine about whether he refers to his underpants as “panties.”

A former intelligence analyst in Baghdad in 2009 and 2010, Manning stands accused of giving thousands of classified documents to WikiLeaks, including logs about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and more than 250,000 diplomatic cables. If convicted of the most serious count of the 22 charges against him — aiding the enemy — Manning could face life in prison.

Manning was detained on May 29, 2010, and has been in pre-trial lock-up since. The pretrial hearings have focused primarily on a period of nearly nine months that he was locked up alone in a small cell at the Marine Corps brig in Quantico, Va., and forced to sleep naked for several nights. His lawyers say the solitary confinement constituted illegal punishment — and grounds to dismiss all charges.

Military prosecutors in the case maintain that Manning’s treatment was proper — confining him initially as a maximum-security detainee who posed a risk of injury to himself or others, and after further evaluation changing his status to medium risk.

In Fort Meade on Sunday, the Marine who served as the Quantico brig counselor while Manning was held there defended the decision to keep Manning on strict, "Prevention of Injury" status for months - much longer than most other detainees.

Marine Master Sergeant Craig Blenis said that Manning's statements and actions warranted his restricted status, including when he responded to a question about his suicidal tendencies with the written statement, "Always planning, never acting."

Blenis argued that you don't go to an airport and joke about a bomb, you don't go to D.C. and joke about assassination, and you don't go to a jail and joke about suicide. "If someone tells me they're going to shoot themselves in the face, I'm not going to give them a gun," he said.

Asked about Manning's claim that his statement was just sarcasm, Blenis said that he doesn't interpret sarcasm, "not when you're talking about hurting yourself." 

The defense argued that Manning's continued good behavior should have warranted fewer restrictions. Blenis replied that being polite and courteous doesn't mean someone will not hurt themselves.

Blenis referenced several instances of Manning's odd behavior, citing posing in front of the mirror and flexing his muscles, playing peek-a-boo with himself, and licking the bars of his cell.

Defense attorney David Coombs asked why posing in the mirror was unorthodox, saying that he has done that before, too. Is playing peek-a-boo odd? he asked.

"It's not normal," Blenis said.

In March 2011 Manning made another statement about suicide, saying that if he wanted to kill himself, he could use his underwear or his socks. The guards then began to take away Manning's underwear and socks at night.

Coombs asked Blenis about an email between some members of the Brig staff that said to make sure Manning was not standing naked at evening count, saying, "You should be taking his panties right before he lays down."

Blenis responded that the words underwear and panties can be interchangeable.

"So you call your underwear panties?" Coombs asked.

"Sometimes I do, sir," Blenis said.

"That's your testimony?" Coombs asked.

"Yes, sir," he responded.

March Madness?
Earlier in the day, Staff Sergeant Ryan Jordan told the defense during cross-examination that one reason Manning was kept on prevention of injury status – essentially one level below suicide watch – was that Manning rarely engaged in conversation with the guards.

Jordan related an instance when he and Manning spoke about the upcoming March Madness — the frenzy around the national college basketball playoffs — and said that Manning talked about how he had enjoyed filling out brackets in previous years.

Coombs asked Jordan whether Manning having a possible gender identity disorder was factored into the decision to keep Manning on prevention of injury status, referring to the defendant as Breanna Elizabeth Manning, the alias Manning used when he first arrived at Quantico.

A gender identity disorder "didn't weigh heavily" in his consideration, Jordan said.

The defense attorney also put Manning’s height and weight on the record Sunday for consideration by the judge, postulating that Manning may have been quiet because he was physically intimidated by Jordan. Staff Sergeant Jordan stands 6 foot 9 inches, while Manning is 5 foot 2 inches and weighs about 105 pounds, Coombs said.

NBC News' Kari Huus, The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report. 

More content from NBCNews.com:

• Florida guide uses hunting as rustic therapy for combat veterans
• Police: Kansas City Chiefs linebacker kills girlfriend, then himself
• Cuba pushes swap: its spies jailed in US for American contractor held in Havana
• Passengers killed when tour bus hits Miami airport overpass
• Women warriors pass elite Army training course
• Teacher lured boys online to get nude pics, cops say
• 66 species of coral proposed for protection by US

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Patrick Semansky / AP

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning steps out of a security vehicle as he is escorted into a courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., on Thursday.

FORT MEADE, Md. -- Pfc. Bradley Manning spent six more hours on the stand Friday during a hearing on the WikiLeaks case, facing questions from the prosecution, the judge and his own attorney, David Coombs.

The discussion never deviated from Manning's treatment while at Quantico brig, focusing mainly on why he didn't complain about his treatment before January and on various incidents that may have led to the military to put Manning on prevention of injury status, which put more restrictions on him.

Manning did seem to choke back tears at one point when he spoke about his family.

When asked why he never complained about his restrictive status to his family during visits, Manning's voice hitched and his face got red. "I didn't want them to worry about me," he said. He added that he worried that he would not be allowed to have visitors if he complained.

One of the Marine guards who was assigned to Manning testified Friday evening about how Manning behaved at Quantico, saying that he was not a disrespectful inmate, with the exception of an incident in January 2011.

The guard testified that Manning yelled at the brig commander, which led the guards to call a "code blue" and mobilize a response team to possibly remove Manning forcibly from his cell. In the end, Manning wasn't removed from his cell, but the guard explained just how significant this incident was in the facility.

Assange asks Obama to release leak suspect

"It was an extremely big deal to show disrespect to the commanding officer of the brig," the former guard said.

Judge Denise Lind asked whether it was standard for someone who is disrespectful to the commander to be placed on suicide watch as a result.

Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

"It never happened before," the former guard said.

Earlier, a prosecutor, U.S. Army Maj. Ashden Fein, read through dozens of weekly evaluations in which Manning said that treatment by his guards was "excellent" and the facility "very professional." Fein also walked through months of assessments in which Manning did not ask to be taken off of protective status (which is essentially one step less restrictive than suicide watch).

Despite arriving at Quantico in late July 2010, Manning did not ask to be taken off prevention of injury status until January 2011, the defense said, when he appeared before a board to plead his case for fewer restrictions.

The defense argued that Manning demonstrated that he might harm himself on several occasions - including once making a noose.

Among the exhibits presented in court Friday were two bedsheets. Manning said that he recognized one of the sheets and, when asked whether it was the sheet he had made a noose out of while in detention in Kuwait, Manning said, "yes, sir."

Watch US News videos on NBCNews.com

The prosecution asked about Manning's handwritten statement on an admission form at the Quantico brig, in which he responded to a question about any suicidal tendencies with a cryptic "Always planning, never acting."

Manning said that when he appeared before the board in January 2011, the focus was on those two incidents. When the board asked about his admission statement, Manning told the court Friday that he had responded that it was really more of a philosophical question, so he gave them a longer, more intellectual answer.

Bradley Manning's psychiatrist says his recommendations ignored by Quantico staff

Manning said he argued with the board about what is really true or false, and explained that humans are fallible. He said it may have been a "sarcastic answer, given on a whim."

Manning did elicit laughter from some people in the courtroom when Fein asked him if he needed a "comfort break." Manning responded that he could wait. "Seven more minutes will be good," he said, adding, "I can control my bladder." The prosecutor said he would try to limit his next few questions to exactly seven minutes.

More content from NBCNews.com:

• Missouri Powerball jackpot winners revealed: 'We’re still stunned by what’s happened'
• Mystery man claims winning Powerball ticket ... in Maryland?
• For Salvation Army, there's gold in them thar kettles
• Dozens hospitalized after train derails near Philadelphia, spilling hazardous chemical
• Video: Sinkhole the size of four football fields stops traffic in Ohio

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Patrick Semansky / AP

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning.

FORT MEADE, Md. -- The U.S. soldier accused in the biggest leak of classified information in U.S. history broke his silence in court Thursday, speaking in great length and detail about his time in various U.S. military detention facilities.

In the third day of a hearing to determine whether he should face court-martial, Pfc. Bradley Manning began by describing the day he was detained in Iraq on May 27, 2010, and then described each cell and detention facility he's been in since.

After a few days in a facility in Iraq, Manning was taken to Camp Arifjan in Kuwait. He characterized his cell there as a "cage," dark and with no air conditioning. Manning said that after several weeks in the segregation tent at Camp Arifjan he felt like a caged animal. "I was a mess, I totally started to fall apart," he said.

Manning described how he "started to really deteriorate,” and how he was anxious all the time. "I'm going to die, I'm stuck inside this cage," he said he thought to himself, adding, "I had pretty much given up."

He said that on June 30, 2010, he had a mental break from reality. Manning said that he doesn't remember yelling uncontrollably, screaming, mumbling, or making a noose out of his bedsheets, describing everything from those hours as foggy and hazy.

Manning acknowledged that he "certainly contemplated" suicide but that he "didn't want to die," he just wanted to "get out of the cage."  After several weeks of medication, Manning said, he began to "flatten out."

That July, he found out he was moving to another facility, but he had no idea where he was going. He speculated that he could be going to Guantanamo Bay, saying that he was "very scared" and "had no idea" what would happen to him. It wasn't until he was on a plane in Germany that he found out he was flying to Baltimore-Washington International Airport.WI.

Manning said he was "elated" to be back on U.S. soil, but that feeling was trampled when he arrived at Quantico for in-processing. He testified that the Marines conducted a "shark attack" on him, forcing him to fill out paperwork for hours, barking at him the entire time.

Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

During those hours, Manning answered a question about any suicidal tendencies by saying that he is "always plotting, but never acting."  He wasn't thinking about what he was writing so he responded sarcastically he said, adding that he now regrets that. That statement would haunt him for the duration of his time at Quantico.

Manning was placed on suicide risk when he arrived at Quantico, and he stayed at virtually the same restrictive level for his entire nine months there.

During Thursday’s hearing he used a diagram made of white tape on the floor of the courtroom to illustrate how small his Quantico cell was. He put on a suicide smock (the thick, heavy jumper he was given to sleep in at night), showed a suicide mattress, and described his daily life there.

Manning was always in restraints when out of his cell, and he described in detail a minor altercation he had with the guards in January 2011 that led to even further restrictions.

Manning, frustrated to still be on restrictions in March 2011, tried to make his case to the commander at the brig. He argued that if he wanted to kill himself, he could just use his socks or underwear, something already in his cell.

As expected, that caused the brig leadership to begin taking his clothes away from him at night, citing the need to protect him from harming himself. This was how Manning ended up standing naked at count one morning. Manning testified that he spent several minutes standing completely naked as the guards counted the prisoners after his first night without clothes. His clothes were taken away again that night (and every night after that), but the following mornings the guards had his clothes waiting for him before count.

Watch the Top Videos on NBCNews.com

In April 2011, Manning was transferred to the Joint Detention Facility at Fort Leavenworth, Kan. He described how strange it felt to be allowed to move around without leg and arm restraints. "It felt awkward," he said. He was surprised to see that at his new facility he was not only given underwear, but he had a T-shirt, shorts, sheets, blankets, a pillow and toiletry items.

Manning testified that this was a "huge upgrade" and he was actually concerned that it was a mistake or miscommunication. Manning got into a verbal and physical altercation with another detainee at Leavenworth, but they were both punished and he has not had any other problems since then.

Overall, Manning testified for more than six hours this afternoon. He was polite, answering sir or ma'am to every question. He rambled at times, clearly unsure how to answer certain questions from his own attorney, and often forgetting names and dates.

We learned a little bit about how he spent his 21 to 23 hours per day in solitary ... he testified that he wasn't allowed to exercise in his cell at Quantico, so he would often "practice various dance moves," calling it "a form of pseudo exercising."

He said he often made faces at himself in the mirror in his cell and played peek a boo with himself, calling the mirror "the most entertaining thing in there." He said he knew he was looking at himself in the mirror, and that he "wasn't seeing anyone else."

Manning acknowledged that he would pretend to lift imaginary weights, calling it strength training, and that he did pretend to have sword fights with himself and that he knew that the guards were watching him.

And he said he prefers non-fiction books and enjoys reading about philosophy and history, but he named John Grisham and Tom Clancy as a couple of his favorite authors.

Court is now in recess. Manning is back in court Friday morning for cross examination from the prosecution.

More content from NBCNews.com:

• Electrician facing foreclosure collects $1M Powerball prize
• Video: Polar ice melting faster than expected
• 'I screwed up royally,' Petraeus writes to old Army chum
• Source: Lawsuits between Strauss-Kahn, hotel maid settled in principal
• Bear spray arrest: Woman catches suspect in Bay Area package thefts
• Teen girls were best friends in life, together in death
•  

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Mark Wilson / Getty Images

Pfc. Bradley E. Manning is escorted from a pre-trail hearing on Tuesday in Fort Meade, Md. Manning is accused of sending hundreds of thousands of classified Iraq and Afghanistan war logs and more than 250,000 diplomatic cables to the website WikiLeaks while he was working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in 2009 and 2010.

Staff at the Quantico brig kept Army Private First Class Bradley Manning on restrictive lockdown during his time there because they were erring on the side of caution, according to testimony given Wednesday by the base's then-security battalion commander.

The second day of this week's hearings are underway in the case against Manning, who is charged with leaking thousands of pages of classified documents to the website WikiLeaks.

This week's hearings cover a motion filed by the defense claiming that the charges against Manning should be dismissed because his confinement conditions were egregiously harsh while he was held in the Quantico brig between July 2010 and April 2011. Pfc. Manning was held on 23-hour lockdown in a small cell. For several days, the defense said, had his clothes taken from him at night.

This morning, the court heard a portion of testimony from Col. Robert Oltman, who commanded the security battalion at Quantico while Manning was held there.

Manning's defense attorney David Coombs pressed Oltman on a number of email exchanges and meetings Oltman had with Quantico leadership and with the psychiatric staff there.

Manning's defense argues in its motion that the Quantico leadership was overly concerned with the Army private, in part because of the media scrutiny surrounding the case and in part because another detainee at Quantico committed suicide just months before Manning's arrival.

During his time at Quantico, Manning remained classified as a maximum-security prisoner and as a risk to his own safety, despite recommendations by the psychiatric staff that Manning was no longer a risk to himself.

After Manning was transferred to the Army prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, he was placed in a medium-security facility with far fewer restrictions.

Col. Oltman testified that he was aware of the psychiatric staff recommendations but that their views were only one part of a larger assessment of Manning's status. The brig staff erred on the side of caution, Oltman said, because Manning arrived at Quantico as a suicide risk and none of his behavior with the brig staff indicated he had changed.

Oltman's testimony will continue when court reconvenes.

More content from NBCNews.com:

• 11 things more likely to happen than winning the Powerball jackpot
• Neighbor charged with murder, rape of Jersey Bridgeman, 6
• Florida man pleads not guilty to shooting teen to death over loud music
• 'Truce is over': Fired-up congressional panel vows strict VA oversight
• Video: Jill Kelley hires high-powered legal help

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Mark Wilson / Getty Images

Pfc. Bradley E. Manning is escorted from a pre-trial hearing Tuesday in Fort Meade, Maryland. Manning attended a motion hearing in the case of United States vs. Pfc. Bradley E. Manning, who is accused of sending hundreds of thousands of classified Iraq and Afghanistan war logs and more than 250,000 diplomatic cables to the website WikiLeaks while he was working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in 2009 and 2010.

FORT MEADE, Md. -- During a pre-trial hearing Tuesday, the defense for Army Private First Class Bradley Manning -- accused of leaking thousands of classified documents to the website Wikileaks – began making the case that Manning's charges should be dismissed, saying the Army private's confinement conditions constitute illegal punishment.

Pfc. Manning's defense team alleges he was improperly classified as a high security risk and as a risk to himself while confined at Quantico, which resulted in Manning being kept on 23-hour lockdown in a small cell. At one point, his clothes were taken from him at night. 

David Coombs, Manning's lead attorney, spent more than six hours questioning retired Marine Corps Col. Daniel Choike (pronounced CHOY-kee), who was commander of the Quantico brig at the time. Coombs asked Choike about a number of emails sent among the brig staff indicating that some at the facility believed that Manning did not require such harsh confinement.

Judges can dismiss charges if treatment prior to trial is egregiously harsh, but it is rare.

Manning's motion is filed under Article 13 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which bars any punishment or penalty other than arrest or confinement while the accused awaits trial.

The brig staff classified Manning as maximum security, usually reserved for violent offenders, and as in need of protection from injury, a classification for prisoners who may harm themselves. The defense argues that Manning needed neither classification and that his status led to unfairly harsh confinement conditions.

Related: Bradley Manning heads to court to argue against trial in Wikileaks case

Just months before Manning entered the Quantico brig, another prisoner, Marine Captain Michael Webb, committed suicide while being held there. The defense's motion paints a picture of a base overly concerned about another suicide in the facility's brig, particularly with a prisoner as high profile as Manning.

On the witness stand today, the brig's commander maintained that Manning's classifications as a maximum security prisoner and as a risk to himself were both proper, citing erratic behavior such as licking his cell's bars and playing peek-a-boo with brig staff.

After nine months at Quantico, Manning was transferred to the Army prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., where he was placed in a medium security facility. He was not deemed a risk to himself.

On Wednesday, the court is expected to hear from a member of the mental health staff at Quantico while Manning was there. Manning, who has never testified in detail himself, is listed as a witness but it is still unclear whether he will testify.

More content from NBCNews.com:

• Powerball fever spikes as jackpot rises to $500 million
• Four men sue NJ organization over 'gay conversion' therapy
• Military women sue over 'combat exclusion' rule
• South Korea to sack Tampa socialite Jill Kelley as honorary consul
• Search for missing Colorado boy suspended as lake sweep yields no clues
• Video: Sandy damage rivals Katrina

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

AP

Demonstrators stand in support of Army Pfc. Bradley Manning outside of Fort Meade, Md., on Tuesday.

The soldier charged in the biggest security breach in U.S. history, was appearing before a military court at Fort Meade, Md., Tuesday, seeking to avert a trial by arguing that he has been subjected to "unlawful pretrial punishment" and "unduly onerous confinement conditions."

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning was expected to testify that he was locked up alone in a small cell for nearly nine months at the Marine Corps brig in Quantico, Va., and forced to sleep naked for several nights — treatment his lawyers say constituted illegal punishment  — and grounds to cancel the trial.

Military judges can dismiss all charges if pretrial punishment is particularly egregious, but experts say it is rare that they do. Military prosecutors in the case maintain that Manning’s treatment was proper — confining him initially as a maximum-security detainee who posed a risk of injury to himself or others, and after later evaluation changing his status to medium risk.

In a 28-page motion filed in August, civilian attorney David Coombs builds an argument, based in part on dozens of email messages, that Quantico officials operated in a culture where "anything goes" and "nobody is held to account for their conduct," and willfully ignored the advice of medical professionals who did not support the solitary confinement.

The motion requests that if the court decides to go forward with the trial and Manning is convicted, he should be given 10 days' credit for time served for every one that he spent in "in conditions tantamount to solitary confinement."

A United Nations investigator called the conditions of Manning's time at Quantico cruel, inhuman and degrading, but stopped short of calling it torture.

Coombs, who specializes in representing soldiers, also argues that Manning has been deprived of the right to a speedy trial.

In total, Manning has been held in pre-trial detention since May 29, 2010 — nearly two and half years.

"By the time the Government actually brings PFC Manning to trial in February of 2013 (983 days after he was placed into pretrial confinement), the Empire State Building could have been constructed almost three times over," Coombs recently wrote in his blog on the case.

Watch US News crime videos on NBCNews.com 

But there are few precedents for military judges dismissing charges based on pretrial punishment.

The usual remedy is credit at sentencing for time served, said Lisa M. Windsor, a retired Army colonel and former Army judge advocate now in private practice in Washington.

In a 1956 case, U.S. v. Bayhand, a military appeals court ordered all charges dismissed against a soldier who had been forced during his pretrial confinement to do hard labor alongside a sentenced prisoner. The court ruled that the soldier had been given an illegal order.

Since then, there have been few, if any, cases in which pretrial punishment has led to dismissal of all charges. Lt. Col. Eric Carpenter, chairman of the criminal law department at the judge advocates school in Charlottesville, Va., said he couldn't find one but he couldn't say for sure that the remedy hasn't been granted.

Manning, a 24-year-old native of Crescent, Okla., is accused of sending hundreds of thousands of classified Iraq and Afghanistan war logs and more than 250,000 diplomatic cables to the secret-spilling website WikiLeaks while he was working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in 2009 and 2010.

Manning has offered to take responsibility for offenses that constitute a small subset of the charges against him. The military judge hasn't yet ruled on whether the offer is permissible, and prosecutors have not said whether they would still pursue the charges against him.

If convicted of aiding the enemy — the most serious of 22 charges he faces — Manning faces possible life imprisonment. 

This article includes reporting from NBC News' Kari Huus and The Associated Press.

More content from NBCNews.com:

• South Korea to sack Tampa socialite Jill Kelley as honorary consul
• Search for missing Colorado boy suspended as lake sweep yields no clues
• Woman denies murder to avenge husband's death
• Columbine survivor turns to Occupy LA to battle foreclosure
• Video: Should children use medical marijuana?
• 'They didn't seem afraid': Wild coyotes pay visit to Chicago's Wrigley Field

Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

Patrick Semansky / AP

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, right, is escorted from a security vehicle outside a courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., for a pre-trial hearing.

FORT MEADE, Md. -- A U.S. military judge on Friday refused a defense request to dismiss 10 of 22 counts against Pfc. Bradley Manning, the U.S. soldier accused of leaking hundreds of thousands of documents to the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks.

Manning's defense attorneys argued that the government used unconstitutionally vague language when charging him with eight counts of unauthorized possession and dissemination of the classified information.

The judge, Col. Denise Lind, found that the language was neither unconstitutionally vague nor substantially over-broad, denying the defense motion to dismiss.

The court's second finding was not quite as cut and dry against the defense. Manning's attorneys contend the two counts that he exceeded both his authorization and usage of the military intranet system is also vague and should be dismissed.

While Lind denied the motion to dismiss the charges, she agreed with a previous ruling in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that calls for a very narrow reading of a statute that applies to the charge. She raised the burden of proof for the government when it eventually prosecutes Manning on this charge at his trial.

Lind told the government that it will have to present strong evidence that Manning exceeded his authorized access in order to prove this charge in his trial. Since this is still a pre-trial hearing, the government prosecutors can still dismiss the charges themselves, or even alter them, before the trial ever begins.

The judge also announced that the defense requested additional time before Manning's trial begins, and the prosecution did not object. So, while the trial was likely to be in late September and early October, the judge now says to expect it to begin in either November or in January.  Pre-trial motions set for the end of June, end of July and end of August will all stay as scheduled though, Lind said.

Manning, a 24-year-old Crescent, Okla., native, faces the possibility of life in prison if convicted of the most serious charge: aiding the enemy. He allegedly sent to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks classified diplomatic cables and war logs downloaded from government computers while working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in late 2009 and early 2010.

Lind’s rulings came in the third day of a three-day pre-trial hearing. Manning’s lawyers were seeking  government damage-assessment reports to prepare their defense. They also were seeking to have 10 of the 22 counts against Manning dismissed.

Earlier: Bradley Manning lawyers quiz State Department officials about WikiLeaks fallout

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

• Oil boom brings wealth and waste to North Dakota
• Man using Zimmerman's old cell phone number gets threatening call
• 3 men found shot dead in car near Columbia University in New York
• Did Canada's alleged cannibal killer Luka Magnotta strike in LA?
• Video: Siblings late to school 160 times
• How hidden camera confession helped clear high school football star

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Patrick Semansky / AP

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, right, is escorted to a courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., Thursday.

Updated at 3:15 p.m. ET: FORT MEADE, Md. -- Two State Department officials testified Thursday morning in a military court that they took part in efforts to control damage after hundreds of thousands of secret U.S. documents were leaked to the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks.

Their testimony came in the second day of a three-day pre-trial hearing as Army Pfc. Bradley Manning’s defense team tried to compel the government to turn over damage assessment reports that resulted from the 2010 leaks. His lawyers also are seeking the dismissal of 10 of the 22 counts against Manning, accused of leaking the documents.

Manning's civilian attorney, David Coombs, cross-examined both State officials about the department’s response to the crisis.

Operations Center Director Rena Bitter testified that a working group formed Nov. 28, 2010 -- the day 220 redacted cables were published online and in international newspapers -- and operated 24/7 for three weeks. Embassies and consulates around the world assessed security risks in the wake of the leaks and submitted them to a chiefs of mission review group. In total, four damage control task forces were formed, Bitter said.

The former director of the Office of Management Policy Right Sizing and Information Policy, Marguerite Coffey, described on the stand her leadership role in the mitigation group created to study the policy flaws that contributed to the initial leak and the "extensive records" that the task force kept on file.

Both witnesses testified that they knew of an official State Department damage assessment report but had never seen it.

Manning, a 24-year-old Crescent, Okla., native, faces the possibility of life in prison if convicted of the most serious charge: aiding the enemy. He allegedly sent to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks classified diplomatic cables and war logs downloaded from government computers while working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in late 2009 and early 2010.

Also Thursday morning, the military judge, Col. Denise Lind, denied a motion that would require the government to identify exculpatory evidence in the material it discloses to the defense. Citing a lack of United States Code of Military Justice precedent, Lind ruled that although the prosecution has an obligation to turn over “Brady material” to the defense, it is not required to provide the defendant with the location of the relevant information when it discloses evidence.

"Brady material" refers to evidence known to the prosecution that is favorable to the defense and material in establishing the defendant's guilt or innocence. The Supreme Court ruled in Brady v. Maryland that withholding this evidence violates the defendant's right to due process.

The pretrial hearing began Wednesday and is expected to conclude Friday.

Earlier: Military court tells US to give records to WikiLeaks suspect Bradley Manning

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

• Crackdown on painkiller abuse fuels new wave of heroin addiction
• Jerry Sandusky trial: Many jurors have Penn State ties
• Judge grants Zimmerman another bond hearing
• Video: Sex offender running for school board post
• Dog gets starring role in study on what stresses killer whales

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Alex Wong / Getty Images

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning is escorted from a military court Wednesday at the end of the first day of a three-day motion hearing in Fort Meade, Md.

Updated at 8 p.m. ET: FORT MEADE, Md. -- A military court Wednesday ordered the U.S. government to turn over secret documents about WikiLeaks suspect Pfc. Bradley Manning to his defense lawyers, NBC News reported.

The victory for Manning came on the opening day of a three-day pretrial hearing outside Washington where his lawyers were also seeking dismissal of 10 of the 22 counts against him.

The court judge, Col. Denise Lind, also said she would take into consideration a defense motion to delay Manning’s scheduled Sept. 21 trial due to the exhaustive search for government records.

"The court is certainly willing to entertain any good-cause motions for continuance," Lind said.

Agence France Presse news agency described Manning as frail-looking while seated between two members of his defense team when the hearing got under way after an hour-long closed door meeting between lawyers for both sides.

Manning, a 24-year-old Crescent, Okla., native, faces the possibility of life in prison if convicted of the most serious charge: aiding the enemy. He allegedly sent to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks hundreds of thousands of classified diplomatic cables and war logs downloaded from government computers while working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in late 2009 and early 2010.

Motions filed by defense attorney David Coombs before the hearing said the U.S. government used "unconstitutionally vague" or "substantially overbroad" language in eight counts of their indictment, in which Manning is accused of "possession and disclosure of sensitive information."

For two other counts, in which Manning is accused of "having knowingly exceeded authorized access" to a secret Defense Department computer network, defense lawyers said the government failed to state an offense.

The defense team also asked the court to compel the government to produce material including investigation reports by the White House and House of Representatives.

One motion accused the government of responding "in its typical nonsensical, smoke-and-mirrors fashion."

NBC News reported that Lind ruled that the government must give Manning's defense team a redacted version of the Defense Intelligence Agency's WikiLeaks Damage Assessment Report. The team will receive the report "almost in its entirety," as only specific classified information shall be removed, NBC News reported.

Motions discussed Wednesday raised questions about the prosecution's operating procedure during the discovery process, a mandatory pre-trial information exchange of evidence, NBC News reported

In one of many examples that came to light, the government maintains a working index of the hundreds of thousands of documents examined during discovery, but it does not provide the defense counsel with any type of reference material when it turns over the files.

Coombs asked the court to stop the prosecution's so-called "hide the ball" tactics.

The government responded by criticizing Coombs' evidence requests as overly broad, accusing the defense of "fishing expeditions."

Coombs described his attempt to obtain documents emerging from an ongoing House Oversight investigation: "Short of telling the government that the documents are in a red file in [House Oversight Chairman] Darrell Issa's third drawer, beneath his Bible, you can't get much more specific than my request," Coombs said.

Lind, chastised the prosecution for its "circular arguments" and questioned its past judgment of discoverable evidence, warning, "If you see something that could be material to the preparation of the defense --  even if you don't have a request for that specific piece of evidence -- you disclose it."

The court reviewed damage assessments from the State Department, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the CIA before proceedings began Wednesday, in order to determine what information should be turned over to the defense and what information should be removed in the interests of national security.

Manning's defense team was given a slightly redacted version of the State Department's investigation on Tuesday evening, the Guardian newspaper of London reported.

NBC's Ellie Hall and The Associated Press contributed to this story.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

• 11 famed US sites named to annual 'most endangered places' list
• Video: Florida graduation takes explosive turn
• Prosecutors have 'bizarre' letters Sandusky wrote to victim, source tells NBC
• Coroner: Two teens killed on tracks were playing 'Ghost Train' game
• US appeals court won't revisit California's Prop 8

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook