• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: 'Extreme' Arizona wildfire burns 5,000 acres in just 7 hours
  • Recommended: Alleged 'alphabet murders' killer tells jury, 'I'm not the monster'
  • Recommended: 'Industry of mediocrity': Rookie teachers woefully unprepared, report says
  • Recommended: Colorado's most destructive wildfire mostly contained as officials welcome rain

NBC News reporters bring you compelling stories from across the nation. For more US news, follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 1
    day
    ago

    California prosecutors: Man threw ex-wife off cruise ship in Italy

    By Elisha Fieldstadt, NBC News

    A man was arraigned on indictment for murder on Monday by a California grand jury for throwing his ex-wife over the side of a cruise ship, according to the Orange County District Attorney.

    The indictment against Lonnie Loren Kocontes, 55, includes one felony count of murder for financial gain.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    Prosecutors said that that Kocontes and his ex-wife, Micki Kanesaki, divorced in 2001 but lived together on and off for the next several years. They were also comfortable with traveling together and in 2006 went on a cruise that left from Spain.

    That's when Kocontes is accused of strangling Kanesaki, throwing her body over the side of the ship into Italian waters — and then reporting her missing.

    He later moved over $1 million from their joint bank accounts and the proceeds from the sale of their shared home into his own accounts and his new wife’s accounts, according to the DA.

    According to the press release, the money transfer drew suspicions from the FBI and the Orange County Sheriff’s department later found additional evidence against Kocontes. He was arrested in February of this year.

    Although a judge already ruled on May 29 that the state of California has the right to try the case since Kanesaki was a California resident, Kocontes will fight to have the case thrown out during a June 26 hearing, claiming that local authorities do not have jurisdiction to prosecute him, The Associated Press reported.

    He did not enter a plea after his charges were read Monday.

    If he is convicted, Kocontes faces a life sentence but would also be eligible for the death penalty, officials said.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report

    233 comments

    Hanging is too good for this guy. Spending the rest of his life in a hard labor prison is a good solution IMO.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: cruise, california, charges, jury
  • 12
    May
    2013
    12:49pm, EDT

    O.J. Simpson seeks to have robbery conviction thrown out

    The jailed former football star, 65, is seeking a new trial in his 2007 armed robbery conviction, saying his previous lawyer shouldn't have handled the case.

    By Linda Deutsch, Associated Press

    O.J. Simpson will head to a Las Vegas courtroom Monday in a bid to have his conviction on armed robbery and kidnapping charges thrown out on the grounds that he did not receive proper legal representation at his 2008 trial.

    Simpson, serving 9 to 33 years in prison for his role in a bizarre hotel room robbery in which the former actor and football star argued he was trying to reclaim memorabilia that had been stolen form him, has filed what lawyers call a "Hail Mary motion" seeking freedom.  Simpson argues his conviction should be set aside and a new trial ordered because of "ineffective counsel and conflict of interest."


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    Most defendants lose these writ of habeas corpus motions, but in this case nobody is taking bets on the outcome.

    "Nothing is the same when O.J. is involved," said Loyola Law School professor Laurie Levenson, who observed Simpson's Los Angeles trial. "An O.J. case is never like any other case."

    Simpson was famously acquitted on murder charges related to the death of his ex-wife and her friend in a 1995 trial that captivated the nation. When he was sentenced in 2008, Clark County District Court Judge Jackie Glass, referencing the murder trial, said that her penalty was not intended as "retribution or any payback for anything else."

    She made no mention of the two Las Vegas police detectives overheard in a taped conversation saying that if California authorities couldn't "get" Simpson, those in Nevada would. The tape was played at the trial.

    Simpson has filed 19 claims of ineffective counsel and attorney conflict of interest in the 2008 case. Simpson contends his trial attorney never told him about a plea bargain that had been offered by prosecutors. He also said in a sworn statement that the same attorney knew about the memorabilia sting before it happened, and "he advised me that I was within my legal rights."

    Simpson is expected to testify sometime during the week-long hearing.

    Now 65 years old, Simpson has already spent the last four years in prison and must serve at least nine years of his maximum 33-year sentence before he is even eligible for parole. He would be 70 by then. If Simpson doesn't win a new trial, he could conceivably spend the rest of his life locked up.

    Sam Mircovich / AFP - Getty Images file

    Double murder defendant O.J. Simpson puts on one of the bloody gloves as a Los Angeles Sheriff's Deputy looks on during the O.J. Simpson murder trial on June, 15, 1995.

    Simpson, according to trial testimony, organized a posse of five friends and acquaintances to accompany him to a hotel where he was told some men were trying to sell his mementos, including family pictures. It was to be a sting of sorts, in which the memorabilia dealers would think an anonymous buyer was coming.

    When Simpson walked into the Las Vegas hotel room, he realized he knew the sellers from previous dealings and he accused them of stealing from him. He shouted that no one was to leave the room - an action that would be judged to fit the legal definition of kidnapping. As Simpson's guys began bagging up the memorabilia, one of them pulled a gun, according to trial testimony.

    No one was injured, but the sellers called the police - and another Simpson case for another century was launched.

    It turned out that Tom Riccio, another memorabilia dealer who played middleman between Simpson and the sellers, had planted a tape recorder in the hotel room and the tape, played for jurors, was powerful evidence.

    Simpson's cohorts testified against him, including the man who said he brought a gun. They were an odd assortment of down-on-their luck Vegas characters who received plea deals and were set free on probation.

    Simpson's co-defendant at his trial, Clarence "C.J." Stewart, served more than two years in prison before the Nevada Supreme Court overturned his conviction. The justices ruled Simpson's fame tainted the proceedings and that Stewart should have been tried separately. Stewart took a plea deal to avoid a retrial and was released.

    Those who try to explain Simpson's fall from grace it come back to one word - hubris, the literary allusion to excessive self-confidence, pride and arrogance. Simpson refused to accept that people didn't idolize him anymore. He boasted about his continuing celebrity status. He was delighted that people still wanted his autograph and wanted to hang out with him at the pool of The Palms hotel in Las Vegas. And that was where the disastrous plan was born.

    He had come to Las Vegas that September of 2007 for a happy event. His old friend, Tom Scotto, was getting married and invited Simpson to be his best man. Scotto still sounds anguished when he recalls the weekend.

    "If it wasn't for me," Scotto said in an interview, "he wouldn't have been there."

    © 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    248 comments

    Too bad OJ you didn't fool all of us. ROT in jail and Hell !!!!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: court, charges, murder, las-vegas, o-j-simpson
  • Updated
    28
    Feb
    2013
    6:33pm, EST

    Judge accepts Bradley Manning's guilty pleas on 10 lesser charges; trial on 12 others set for June

    Patrick Semansky / AP file

    Army Pfc. Bradley Manning steps out of a security vehicle as he is escorted into a courthouse in Fort Meade, Md., on Nov. 29, 2012, for a pretrial hearing.

    By Jim Miklaszewski and Courtney Kube, NBC News

    FORT MEADE, Md. – A military judge on Thursday accepted guilty pleas by  Army Pfc. Bradley Manning to 10 lesser charges against him, leaving the ex-intelligence analyst to face 12 other counts for allegedly leaking hundreds of thousands of government documents to the WikiLeaks website. 

    The acceptance of the "naked guilty pleas" -- meaning there is no agreement between the government and the defense that would limit the sentence – at a pre-trial hearing means that Manning faces up to 20 years in prison, even if he is ultimately acquitted of the most-serious charges against him. 

    Col. Denise Lind, the military judge presiding over the case, also accepted Manning’s “not guilty” pleas to the remaining charges, including "aiding the enemy." His court martial on those charges, which carry a maximum sentence of life in prison, is scheduled to begin on June 3. 

    During the day-long pre-trial hearing, Manning acknowledged that his actions were a discredit to the service and that he knew WikiLeaks was not authorized to have the information he provided. 

    At one point when Lind asked him whether he knew what he was doing was wrong, he answered simply, "Yes, your honor."


    More than an hour of Thursday's hearing was consumed by Manning's composed reading of a 35-page prepared statement that offered his first public explanation of his motives for leaking the government documents to WikiLeaks. He said he did so to “spark domestic debate” on foreign policy and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

    Manning painted himself as a young man with an "insatiable thirst for geopolitical information" and a desire for the world to know the truth about what was happening in Iraq and Afghanistan. But he said he became increasingly disillusioned after being sent to Iraq by actions that "didn't seem characteristic" of the U.S., the leader of free world.

    Manning said under oath that the first documents he sent to WikiLeaks in early 2012 were the combined information data network exchanges for Iraq and Afghanistan, which he described as the daily journals of the "on-the-ground reality" of the conflicts in Iran and Afghanistan. 

    He said he sent the information while on leave and staying at his aunt's house in Potomac, Md., using a public computer at a Barnes & Noble store in Rockville or North Bethesda. He said included a brief note calling the information the most significant documents of our time, and closing with, "Have a good day." 

    He said he tried to send the information to the Washington Post and the New York Times before turning to WikiLeaks.  He said he later sent information to WikiLeaks eight other times from his personal laptop at Contingency Base Hammer in Iraq. 

    Manning is facing 22 criminal charges that include "aiding the enemy" and could face a life sentence if convicted of the most serious charges. 

    Manning said he decided to release the first batch information because he was depressed and frustrated, and felt "a sense of relief" when he returned to Iraq. He said he finally had a "clear conscience" because someone else knew what was happening. 

    His most detailed explanation involved the release of aerial weapons team video showing airstrikes that killed some Iraqi civilians and several Reuters journalists.

    “It was troubling to me" that the U.S. military in Iraq wouldn't release the video, he said. Also disturbing was the "seemingly delightful blood lust" exhibited when members of the air crew referred to the civilians as "dead bastards" and congratulated one another on their ability to kill large numbers of people. He said he was encouraged by the public response, that others were "as troubled" as he was.

    In addition to the charge of aiding the enemy, Manning pleaded not guilty to counts alleging theft of U.S documents or videos -- including allegations that he stole the list of all of the emails and phone numbers of U.S. military and personnel in Iraq at the time -- unauthorized access of that information and downloading unauthorized software onto government computers.

    The charges to which he pleaded guilty included intentionally causing intelligence information to be published on the Internet, improper handling of classified information and counts of conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline.

    Specifically, Manning acknowledged that he had unauthorized possession of information, that he willfully communicated it, and that he communicated it to an unauthorized person. However, he only acknowledged that for nine specific files or pieces of information, including: 

    • Combat engagement video of a helicopter gunship;
    • Two Army intelligence agency memos;
    • Certain records of the combined information data network exchange Iraq (which tracks all significant acts and patrol reports);
    • Combined information data network exchange Afghanistan records;
    • Some SOUTHCOM files dealing with Guantanamo Bay;
    • An investigation into an incident in a village in Farah, Afghanistan; 
    • Some Department of State cables.

    Related story: WikiLeaks case: Bradley Manning seeks first public statement on motive

    At his court martial, Manning’s defense is expected to argue that he considered himself a "whistleblower" and released the documents with "no malicious intent" or the intent to do "any harm to anyone." The government contends the release of the documents put some lives at risks, including the names of Afghans who were working with the U.S. military and intelligence.

    Jim Miklaszewski is NBC News’ Chief Pentagon Correspondent and Courtney Kube is NBC News’ National Security Producer.  

     

    This story was originally published on Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:00 AM EST

    675 comments

    wasnt the video of the helicopter shooting unarmed civilians?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: army, charges, pleas, featured, court-martial, updated, wikileaks, bradley-manning
  • 15
    Feb
    2013
    4:47pm, EST

    Jesse Jackson Jr. charged with misusing $750,000 in campaign funds

    The day after former Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. was charged with misusing campaign funds, the downfall of the once rising political star has shaken his hometown of Chicago. NBC's Michael Isikoff reports.

    By Ward Room staff, NBCChicago.com

    Federal officials filed charges Friday against Jesse Jackson Jr. after the former congressman reportedly signed a plea deal for allegedly improperly spending hundreds of thousands in campaign funds.

    The paperwork was filed at the U.S District Courthouse in Washington. Jackson, who left the public eye last summer for treatment of bi-polar disorder and resigned from office in November, is not expected to make an appearance, but he offered a response in his first statement to the public in months.

    Read the full indictment here in PDF


    “Over the course of my life I have come to realize that none of us are immune from our share of shortcomings and human frailties," Jackson said in the statement released by the attorneys representing him in the federal probe.

    "Still I offer no excuses for my conduct and I fully accept my responsibility for the improper decisions and mistakes I have made," he said. "To that end I want to offer my sincerest apologies to my family, my friends and all of my supporters for my errors in judgment and while my journey is not yet complete, it is my hope that I am remembered for the things that I did right.”

    Among the items that Jackson is accused of purchasing with campaign funds: 

    • $10,000 worth of Bruce Lee Memorabilia. 
    • More than $20,000 in Michael Jackson memborabilia. 
    • Martin Luther King Memorabilia. 
    • Fur coats and capes and more. 

    NBCChicago reported last week that Jackson will plead guilty as part of his plea deal, and jail time would be in the hands of a federal judge who has not yet been assigned. Converting campaign contributions for personal use is strictly prohibited by federal law and opens Jackson up to “not more than 5 years” in prison. 

    Prosecutors will recommend a prison sentence for between 46 and 57 months plus fines, according to reports.

    On Friday federal prosecutors charged the former congressman with misusing $750,000 in campaign funds. He is accused of purchasing several personal items including Michael Jackson memorabilia. NBC's Lester Holt reports.

    Jackson's wife, former Chicago Ald. Sandi Jackson, has also been charged with falsifying her tax returns and reporting less income than she made.

    Read the Sandi Jackson indictment here in PDF

    Sandi Jackson has pleaded guilty to the tax offense, according to her attorney Tom Kirsch. The single charge carries a maximum prison sentence of 3 years, but Kirsh said the plea agreement calls for significantly less time. 

    "Today, Sandi Jackson reached an agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to plead guilty to one count of tax fraud," reads a statement from her attorneys. "Ms. Jackson has accepted responsibility for her conduct, is deeply sorry for her actions, and looks forward to putting this matter behind her and her family. She is thankful for the support of her family and friends during this very difficult time."

    Per the reported plea deal for Jackson Jr., he must repay the government hundreds of thousands of dollars for items such as a $40,000 Rolex watch, travel expenses for a woman he described as a “social acquaintance” and furniture purchased for his home.

    Related coverage from NBCChicago

    • Jesse Jackson Jr. signs plea deal In federal probe
    • Comparing the Jackson families
    • Candidates to Replace Jesse Jackson Jr.

    Sandi Jackson resigned last month from her elected position as Chicago’s 7th Ward alderman. For years she received a $5,000 a month check from her husband as his political consultant.

    Jackson Jr., the son of famous civil rights leader Rev. Jesse Jackson, has been the subject of a federal investigation into potential misuse of campaign funds since around the time he left office to seek medical treatment on June 10, 2012.

     

    1298 comments

    just like the ass obama mis-using OUR tax dollars.....see Solyndra, GM, stimulus plan etc etc...someone impeach this clown obama....

    Show more
    Explore related topics: campaign, funds, charges, criminal, featured, jesse-jackson-jr, sandi, nbcchigago
  • 8
    Jun
    2012
    12:15pm, EDT

    Judge refuses to dismiss Sandusky charges; trial set to begin Monday

    Patrick Smith / Getty Images

    Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky.

    By NBC News

    The judge in former Penn State assistant coach Jerry Sandusky’s child sex abuse trial on Friday dismissed a last-ditch defense motion to toss the case.

    McKean County (Pa.) Senior Judge John Cleland issued a three-paragraph order (.pdf) denying the motion, meaning that all 52 charges remain in place heading into opening arguments, which are scheduled Monday morning.


    Sandusky, 68, former defensive coordinator of Penn State’s football team under the late legendary coach Joe Paterno, is accused of sexually abusing 10 boys over a 15-year period. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

    A panel of seven women and five men was selected during two days of jury selection earlier this week.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Oil boom brings wealth and waste to North Dakota
    • Man using Zimmerman's old cell phone number gets threatening call
    • 3 men found shot dead in car near Columbia University in New York
    • Did Canada's alleged cannibal killer Luka Magnotta strike in LA?
    • Video: Siblings late to school 160 times
    • How hidden camera confession helped clear high school football star

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    83 comments

    I hope, I pray that sandusky and his band of scum ALL get what they deserve!!!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: trial, penn-state, charges, child-sex-abuse, sandusky
  • 10
    Feb
    2012
    11:13am, EST

    NBC: District paid teacher at center of LA abuse scandal to settle

    Mark Berndt, the teacher at the center of the shocking Miramonte child sex-abuse scandal, was paid $40,000 by the Los Angeles Unified School District in June of 2011 as part of a settlement. KNBC-TV's Joel Grover reports.

    By Joel Grover and Chris Henao, NBCLosAngeles.com

    Los Angeles Unified School District paid the teacher at the center of the Miramonte child sexual abuse scandal $40,000 as part of a settlement in the wake of accusations of classroom behavior deemed “immoral” and “unprofessional” as well as a claim of “evident unfitness for service.”

    In a financial settlement reached in June of 2011, the Los Angeles Unified School District paid Mark Berndt $23,980.10 in back pay and $16,019.90 in legal fees, according to documents obtained in a joint investigation by 89.3 KPCC and NBC4.

    Under the agreement, Berndt, 61, is entitled to his full pension and retirement health benefits.


    Among the accusations levied against Berndt in an administrative hearing:

    • blindfolding students and allowing himself to be blindfolded;
    • taping several students’ mouths as well as his own;
    • spoon-feeding students “an unknown cloudy-colored liquid substance”;
    • and feeding students cookies with “an unknown cloudy-colored liquid substance.”

    Berndt “exhibited poor judgment, unprofessional and immoral conduct” during the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 school years, according to an Accusation and Statement of Charges filed by the district.

    Full Coverage | About Miramonte | Timeline of Events

    The former third-grade teacher also “touched several students by placing his arms around them,” according the document.

    The allegations were levied in a proceeding before the Office of Administrative Hearings, a quasi-judicial court that hears administrative disputes.

    Read the original story, watch video on NBCLosAngeles.com

    Under the terms of the settlement, Berndt, who had been suspended without pay after teaching at Miramonte for 30 years, was retroactively reinstated to “paid status.”

    The settlement, signed by Berndt, his attorney and an attorney for the district, also stipulates that “neither of the parties admits or concedes any of the claims, defenses, or allegations that were raised.”

    The deal opened the door for Berndt to receive his full district pension and health benefits.

    The district first started looking to get rid of Berndt about a year ago. In February of 2011, the district suspended Berndt from his teaching position at Miramonte and notified him that they intended to fire him.

    In March, he objected to the dismissal and requested a hearing, which was set for October.

    But in June, Berndt and the district settled.

    The case first came to the public’s attention in January, when Berndt was arrested and held on $23 million bail for allegedly committing felony molestation with 23 children ages 6 to 10.

    In early February, a second Miramonte teacher, Martin Springer, 41, was arrested on suspicion of committing lewd acts on a child.

    Several days later, it came to light that former teacher’s aide Ricardo Guevara was convicted and sentences to 15 years in prison in 2005 for committing lewd acts with children.

    LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy shut down the school for two days and moved the entire staff to another school that is not yet open. Miramonte reopened on Wednesday with an entirely new staff.

    Follow NBCLA for the latest LA news, events and entertainment: Twitter: @NBCLA// Facebook: NBCLA

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News

    • Super PAC supporting Ron Paul is run by a 9/11 truther
    • Gulf of Mexico? Try 'Gulf of America'
    • US licenses first nuclear reactors since 1978
    • Officials: Israel teams with terror group to kill Iran scientists

    98 comments

    You either have fantastic teachers that are overworked and underpaid, or you have horrifically bad teachers getting paid to do nothing even in the wake of disgusting behavior. Who's responsible for this kind of crap?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: child, abuse, sex, charges, los, angeles, lausd, berndt, miramonte
  • 20
    Dec
    2011
    4:25pm, EST

    Occupy protesters indicted on felony charges in Houston

    Cody Duty / AP

    Occupy Houston protesters lay in the exit ramp at the Port of Houston Authority on Dec. 12.

    By Miranda Leitsinger, Staff Writer, NBC News

    Seven Occupy protesters were indicted on felony charges by a grand jury in Houston on Tuesday, a spokeswoman for the district attorney's office says, in connection with their demonstration at the local port as part of a national day of action by the movement.

    The decision comes nearly a week after a judge initially dismissed the charges, saying the protesters could not be charged with possessing or using a "criminal instrument" – a felony in Texas – for their use of PVC pipe.


     

    The protesters -- three from Austin, four from Houston -- put their arms through the pipe and used latches on it to connect together, making their arrest more difficult but not preventing it, said one of their attorneys, Daphne Silverman, of the National Lawyer's Guild in Houston. Donna Hawkins, a spokeswoman for the District Attorney's Office, confirmed the indictment.

    • Houston DA turns up the heat on Occupy activists

    "They are feeling, 'wow,' is the word. ... They're in a lot of shock. They were very happy with the justice's decision last week, they believed in her, they believed in the justice system," Silverman said. "These people ... are not criminals. These folks are out there attempting to make the country better for all of us."

    Silverman, who noted that she believed the law had been wrongly applied by the prosecutor, said it's likely the protesters will be back in court in January to talk about the next step, such as negotiations or to go to trial. If convicted, they face up to two years in jail.

    • Arrests as Occupy Wall Street makes bid for new camp

    Protester Dustin Phipps -- who is not one of the seven charged -- said it was a "strategic move" by local police to discourage others from participating in civil disobedience.

    "We definitely plan on fighting it," said Phipps, 28, a pre-medical student at the University of Houston. "We're going to move forward ... with faith and determination because we understand we have the rights and the upper hand, and we're going to make sure justice is served."

    The protesters had joined with other Occupy outfits across the country that were conducting port shutdowns on Dec. 12 to economically disrupt what they called "Wall Street on the waterfront.”

    Arrests on felony arrests were occurring in other cities, such as Denver and New York. Civil rights lawyers have suggested the use of felony charges was another form of crackdown on the movement.

    The Houston Police Department has used the "criminal instrument" against protesters on previous occasions, according to Attorney Randall Kallinen, who is representing one of the seven protesters. The charge usually does not hold up in court in such cases, but because it is a felony charge it has a chilling effect on would-be activists, he said.

    "We’ve been seeing more of them (felony arrests), especially beginning of November," said Gideon Oliver of the lawyers guild in New York. The police and the district attorney’s office have discretion in determining the charges, "and so there are two sort of steps in the process where ... the police or the DA, if they conducted a reasonable investigation, I think, in a lot of these cases would realize that they’re overcharging."

    Msnbc.com's Kari Huus contributed to this report.

    Follow @mimileitsinger

    303 comments

    You don't have to agree with their methods or even their messages, but we can never ever give up our freedom of civil disobedience. If not for civil disobedience, this country would not exist. Statistically the numbers for this "Recession" are worse than the number during the The Great Depression. O …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: protest, charges, shutdown, houston, port, felony, occupy, ows

Browse

  • featured,
  • crime,
  • weather,
  • military,
  • updated,
  • california,
  • florida,
  • environment,
  • shooting,
  • us-news,
  • new-york,
  • texas,
  • education,
  • chicago,
  • police,
  • gulf-oil-spill,
  • los-angeles,
  • kari-huus,
  • murder,
  • nbcnewyork,
  • guns,
  • new-jersey,
  • afghanistan,
  • obama,
  • colorado,
  • trayvon-martin,
  • sandy,
  • nbclosangeles,
  • barack-obama,
  • crime-and-courts,
  • politics,
  • gay,
  • fire,
  • arizona,
  • george-zimmerman,
  • veterans,
  • connecticut,
  • crime-courts
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Miranda Leitsinger

Archives

  • 2013
    • June (262)
    • May (461)
    • April (608)
    • March (548)
    • February (510)
    • January (563)
  • 2012
    • December (457)
    • November (460)
    • October (477)
    • September (432)
    • August (525)
    • July (519)
    • June (508)
    • May (566)
    • April (538)
    • March (576)
    • February (471)
    • January (417)
  • 2011
    • December (455)
    • November (190)
    • October (9)
    • September (3)
    • August (51)
    • July (8)
    • June (3)
    • May (12)
    • April (5)
    • March (3)
    • February (1)
    • January (8)
  • 2010
    • December (5)
    • November (1)
    • October (2)
    • September (28)
    • August (40)
    • July (35)
    • June (177)
    • May (50)
    • April (9)
    • March (2)
    • February (2)
    • January (4)
  • 2009
    • December (5)
    • November (5)
    • October (2)
    • September (11)
    • August (4)
    • July (12)
    • June (1)
    • May (1)
    • April (1)
    • March (3)
    • February (3)
    • January (2)
  • 2008
    • December (3)
    • November (2)
    • October (6)
    • September (30)
    • August (26)
    • July (10)
    • June (4)
    • May (8)
    • April (13)
    • March (9)
    • February (7)
    • January (6)
  • 2007
    • December (10)
    • November (6)
    • October (22)
    • September (11)

Most Commented

  • Supreme Court strikes down Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship to vote (3934)
  • Census: White majority in U.S. gone by 2043 (1937)
  • Indiana woman on death row since she was 16 to be released (1285)
  • After Scouts lift gay youth ban, Baptist group calls for firings (2343)
  • Six months later, Newtown families grieve, push for stricter gun-control legislation (1284)
  • Obama proposes reductions to Cold War-era nuclear arsenal (1507)
  • Mom, three teen daughters shot in Nashville; gunman still at large (1121)

Other blogs

  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • US news on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise