To grasp the breadth of the housing crisis affecting a large portion of American troops past and present, consider the ironic case of Grant Moon:

After 13 years as a soldier and captain in the Army National Guard and Army Reserves, logging time in Baghdad during 2007 and 2008, Moon returned to home soil to launch a home-loan advisement firm for service members. This month, Moon’s company will partner with VeteransPlus, a nonprofit that has supplied financial education to more than 150,000 current and former soldiers, airmen, sailors and Marines.

“I am underwater on my home," Moon said. "I can’t refinance (because he owes more on his home loan than the property is worth). Yet I have my own company that’s very well tapped into the mortgage market. So, you know, this is a big problem.”

---

Related: Feds move to help out underwater military homeowners

The rates of underwater mortgages and foreclosures appear to be higher among active-duty U.S. troops and ex-service members than among American civilians, said John E. Pickens, executive director of VeteransPlus, and a former combat medic with the U.S. Army Special Forces and 82nd Airborne Division.

“It’s more commonplace than people know,” agreed William Jewsbury, a retired Army Master Sergeant who spent 33 years in the service. In 2011, he was forced to do a short sale on his home near Portland, Ore., losing about $70,000 in the transaction. “Especially for the guys over in the sandbox – Iraq and Afghanistan – it’s pretty common. If the banks nail you (with a foreclosure notice) while you’re in theater, you can’t just drop whatever you’re doing to come home and take care of it.” 

Related: Company accused of deception turns GIBill.com over to VA

While no firm national statistics are available to gauge the full scope of military-mortgage misery, VeteransPlus says that among the 150,000 service members it has counseled since the U.S. mortgage meltdown began in 2008, 39 percent (or 58,500) had housing concerns, almost half needed emergency financial help, and 82 percent had less than one month of mortgage-payment savings in reserve. 

Service members have “several things stacked against them," Pickens said, especially active-duty troops, national guard and reserves. "Those things include the frequency of deployments and a difficulty finding employment when they get home.”

Related: Pentagon, Congress eye new payday loan rules

Based on interviews with three financial experts who work with service members and two veterans with mortgage issues of their own, there appear to be six basic reasons why thousands of current and former troops are sliding into shaky housing ground.

1. Deployments (and re-deployments) to war zones
More than half of the 150,000 military clients counseled by VeteransPlus are reservists or national guard members, meaning they leave full-time jobs - and their civilian salaries - when they're sent overseas. During deployments, those troops are paid according to their rank.

"Many of them are receiving lower wages while serving as military personnel than they were when employed at home," Pickens said. "So if a guy is, say, an E3 rank, the pay is between $1,750 a month and $1,981 a month." In the States, those same people may gross $3,000 to $5,000 per month or more.

Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

 

Moreover, many service members faced several deployments. When Afghanistan and Iraq broke out, "nobody estimated that a lot of these people would be deployed three to four times," said Chris Fizpatrick, director of strategic partnerships for the Yellow Ribbon Registry Network. "That lack of fiscal planning is something we end up focusing on a great deal."

2. Partners at home often struggle with budgeting
VeteransPlus has tracked a clear trend among the 150,000 military families with whom it has worked: "The person who deploys is typically the person paying the bills at home," said Fitzpatrick, who in addition to his Yellow Ribbon work serves as deputy director of VeteransPlus.

So, before one partner ships out, the other person at home "is saying, 'Hey, wait a minute now: you want me to take care of the bills, the car, the house? This is not my game.' To which the person leaving for duty says, 'Sorry, I have to deploy. Learn it fast.'

"That," Fitzpatrick added," has always been a problem." 

Additionally, when financial issues surface - such as lapsed house payments - the spouse or partner at home is often reluctant to inform the overseas soldier, not wanting them to lose focus while in combat, Pickens said. "They ask themselves: 'Do I really reveal this letter I got from the mortgage company? Do they really need to hear about that where they are right now?' "

When mortgage issues are kept hidden in that way, they only grow bigger and more complicated, both men said. 

3. Predatory lenders
In October 2011, a whistleblower lawsuit was unsealed in a federal court in Atlanta alleging that some of the nation's largest banks and lenders had defrauded veterans out of hundreds of millions of dollars by disguising illegal fees in veterans’ home refinancing loans. 

Among the companies accused in that lawsuit were Wells Fargo, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase and GMAC Mortgage, who were alleged to have engaged in “a brazen scheme to defraud both our nation’s veterans and the United States treasury” of millions of dollars in connection with home loans guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs. As a result, the suit claimed, tens of thousands of the VA loans have gone into default or resulted in foreclosures. 

One of Moon's prime motivations for launching VA Loan Captain was to give veterans a safe place to obtain home financing. His company has so far vetted four banks - mandating that each sign a guarantee pledge that blends ethical, legal and compliance components - before suggesting that his military clients use those institutions to obtain mortgages. 

"We pre-screen these banks and make sure there’s no type of predatory lending. Then we allow the bank to operate on our platform," Moon said. "(Through our company), veterans can go online anonymously, get pricing fees among some of our platform VA lenders so they have a transparent environment to see what the pricing is going to be. That gives them the ability to make an informed decision."

4. Frequent transfers and the military mindset 
When active military members receive orders to transfer to a new base, they have to decide if the market will even allow them to sell their property. If their mortgage is underwater, they will lose money in a sale. 

"When things do happen that affect our stability, primarily for active duty members, it is outside of our control," said Robert Sanders, a retired U.S. Air Force master sergeant who worked in information management, serving 14 years overseas.

His mortgage dilemma emerged after he retired from the military. When Sanders was offered a civilian job in Florida, he was forced to do a short sale on his home in Arizona, which had lost 60 percent of its value during the downturn. (He also was unable to rent the house).

"A military member may have bought a home and thought they could ride out their last few years until retirement at the same location," Sanders said. "However, if the Air Force gives you orders, you cannot refuse them simply based on the fact that you have a home and would need to sell it.

"They have the old ideal that this will be their only home from now until death so, why not start at the top (with a larger, pricier home), since they can't imagine buying now and having the option to perhaps sell and upgrade later. Military tend to think in long-term, locked-in directions" 

Added Moon: "A lot of people in the military don’t necessarily think ahead. It’s like, 'Hey, I'll just buy every two years'. But you have to think ahead. If you’re in the military, chances are you’ll probably move again."

5. Lack of financial literacy
The inability to fully understand the housing market, credit scores, home budgets or other money matters leads many service members to make poor fiscal choices, Moon said. 

"As many military tend to come from lower income families, the idea of ever owning a home is truly an American dream, but the result is to potentially enter (such a purchase) without a basis of (financial) experience or understanding," Sanders said. "The military doesn't tend to push training in areas of personal finance."  

6. VA Loans and buying too big 
Through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, service members can obtain VA-guaranteed mortgages issued by qualified lenders. But some veterans have made the critical mistake, Sanders said, of securing a VA loan they can't truly afford. 

"Having the VA Loan makes it tempting for someone to take more than they need," Sanders said. "This can come from either the Realtor talking it up for their own benefit, or the military member seduced with the 'if THIS is good, but I can afford THAT, why wouldn't I take THAT?' mentality." 

More content from NBCNews.com:

• Is liberal Christianity signing its own death warrant?
• Zimmerman: 'I'm not a racist and I'm not a murderer'
• Lesbian mom on Boy Scouts: We'll keep fighting
• Man writes own obituary, surprising friends, family
• Video: Former cheerleader accused of sexual abuse speaks out

Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

 

The housing market has shown some promising signs of late, but a fresh batch of foreclosure data offers a reminder that any recovery from the housing bust will likely be slow, spotty and painful.

RealtyTrac reported Thursday that foreclosure filings rose by 9 percent in May from a month earlier, to 205,990 total properties that were subject to default notices, scheduled auctions or bank repossessions.

The jump in foreclosure activity was likely because lenders are finally getting to a backlog of homes they might have started foreclosing on last year if they weren’t facing criticism for cutting corners and pushing foreclosures through too quickly and without adequate controls, said Daren Blomquist, a vice president with RealtyTrac.

---

He noted that the major increases came from properties that are just starting the foreclosure process.

Still, the figures for May are down 4 percent from a year ago. In addition, the report noted, recent sales data suggests that not all homes with foreclosure filings will result in the bank taking the property.

“Based on the rise in pre-foreclosure sales we’ve seen so far this year, a higher percentage of these new foreclosure starts will likely end up as short sales or auction sales to third parties rather than bank repossessions going forward,” Brandon Moore, RealtyTrac’s CEO, said in a statement.

That’s important because bank-owned homes tend to sell for less than homes in earlier stages of foreclosure.

RealtyTrac’s data shows that a home that is in pre-foreclosure sells for 21 percent less than a non-distressed home, on average. A bank-owned home sells for 33 percent less on average.

Blomquist cautioned that some of these houses entering the foreclosure process will end up being repossessed by the bank. In addition, the increase in foreclosure activity that is expected as banks work through their backlog could put a damper on housing prices once again, at least in some parts of the country.

“I actually think the stabilization in home prices and home sales is, in part, a result of the foreclosure inventory being artificially restricted over the past year and a half,” he said.

The National Association of Realtors reported last month that existing-home sales rose 3.4 percent from March to April and were up 10 percent from a year earlier.

Median home prices also were up about 10 percent in April from a year earlier. May data is due out next week.

Record-low mortgage rates also could be providing a boost for the housing market. Freddie Mac said last week that the average rate on a 30-year loan dropped to 3.67 percent.

Of course, with real estate it’s always all about location, and the foreclosure report showed that while some pockets of the country have seen some improvement others are still struggling. Georgia posted the highest foreclosure rate for the month, overtaking traditionally foreclosure-plagued states such as Florida, California, Nevada and Arizona.

(You can click on the map above to get data by state, city or ZIP code.)

Blomquist said while some cities seem to have broken the housing-bust cycle and at least stabilized, the data from Georgia illustrates the uneven nature of the market.

“Georgia is still caught in the downward spiral of decreasing home prices, and that in turn is helping to fuel more foreclosures,” he said.

More from msnbc.com business:

• Dads' household duties worth less than moms'
• Lawmakers battle to end 'rental car roulette'
• Americans worry about energy, but feel powerless
• Automakers get Siri-ous with 'eyes free' button
• Video: Trump says Dimon was set up for for loss

 

A Missouri man facing foreclosure opened fire on officers attempting to serve him with eviction papers and was then shot himself, NBC station KSDK in St. Louis reported.

St. Ann, Mo., Police Chief Bob Schrader, who has known the man for 30 years, said the 51-year-old man was distraught about losing the home he grew up in.

---

According to KSDK, Schrader knocked on the door and the man answered holding a gun. Schrader tried to reason with him but the man was just too upset.

Read the original report at ksdk.com 

After police fired tear gas into the house, the man fired shots out of a window and then moved to the front of the house.

Robin Hartley, who lives nearby, said she felt the man's frustration, but firing at police just went too far.

"I have empathy for him because that was the home he grew up in and everybody is going through hard times now, but to shoot, you know, somebody just doing their job," Hartley told KSDK. "He had plenty of notice, that's insane."

The man was shot in the arm but was not in serious condition.

His name will not be released until he is charged, KSDK reported.

Msnbc.com's Louis Casiano contributed to this report from KSDK. 

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

• Crackdown on painkiller abuse fuels new wave of heroin addiction
• Jerry Sandusky trial: Many jurors have Penn State ties
• Judge grants Zimmerman another bond hearing
• Video: Sex offender running for school board post
• Dog gets starring role in study on what stresses killer whales

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

A woman engaged in a bitter battle with Wells Fargo over foreclosure of her southern California home was arrested late Thursday at the tony residence of the bank's CFO in San Marino, where she and dozens of supporters were protesting.

Ana Casas Wilson, 49, who lives in the working-class neighborhood of South Gate, faces eviction from her childhood home. Like many people who have been through foreclosure, she says that the bank wrongly denied her a loan modification and moved to foreclose even when she was able to catch up.

In an action that is becoming increasingly common, Wilson has taken her complaint public and her protest directly to bank officials. In Thursday’s protest, with at least 80 supporters, she attempted to deliver her mortgage payment directly to Tim Sloan, the top financial officer for Wells Fargo. In addition to protesting the foreclosure, the group was challenging an ordinance created last year making it harder to picket in this wealthy enclave.

---

"People are deciding to take this stand that was previously a little unthinkable," said Peter Kuhns, with the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, which helped organize this and other "home defense" actions. "They are risking arrest, refusing to leave, getting their families involved and putting themselves out there."

Many people are shedding the sense of shame of foreclosure, which kept most people silent in the past, even if they didn’t think they had done anything wrong, he said.

"More and more people are standing up and willing to go public because there is no other remedy and putting public pressure on the bank," said Kuhns.

Wells Fargo did not respond directly to Wilson's situation, but provided a statement in response to queries about her.

"Wells Fargo works very hard to keep customers in their homes whenever possible," said the statement, sent by Jennifer Langan in corporate communications. "We review our customers for a variety of modification options, from HAMP, HARP, HAFA and through our own proprietary programs. Despite these efforts, if a customer is 16 or more months delinquent, it can be extremely difficult to recover." 

Some homeowners who have taken this high-profile approach in their fight against foreclosure, enlisting the support of protesters from the Occupy movement and housing activists, are finding success at it.

Occupy movement targets Wells Fargo shareholder meeting

The case of Rose Gudiel, reported by msnbc.com last year, is one example. In October, Gudiel was hunkered down in her home, surrounded by supporters, awaiting eviction. But at the eleventh hour, lender Fanny Mae canceled the eviction notice and offered her a loan modification, enabling her to keep the home.

Many similar foreclosure battles are under way nationwide, with support from a movement called Occupy our Homes.

Wilson, who has cerebral palsy, lives with her husband, who works as a school janitor, her teen son and her mother, who helps care for her. She has worked as a court reporter, and as an advocate for the disabled.

The trouble covering the mortgage started when she was treated for breast cancer in 2009, and her husband’s income declined as a result of cutting hours to help take care of her. They got behind, but their income stabilized several months later. By then, the bank had moved into foreclosure proceedings and would not accept her payments or discuss ways to catch up, Kuhns said.

The implication in Wells Fargo's statement that Wilson was 16 months behind is misleading, says Kuhns, because for most of that time, the bank refused to take her payments.

Thursday’s protest was on Wilson’s behalf, and it was more generally challenging a San Marino ordinance adopted last November – just a few weeks after a protest of predatory lending practices on Sloan’s front lawn. That demonstration, involving about 100 protesters, was peaceful and ended without incident, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Under the statute, picketers must keep 150 feet from a target residence, or 75 feet from the curb adjacent to the home, whichever is farther.

"The purpose of the ordinance is not to reduce picketing, but to protect the people who are the victims of picketing," police Chief John Schaefer told the Times when it was passed. "We're a prime target. We have a lot of people who fit the profile to be the victim of this type of crime."

Video from the protest posted by the San Gabriel Valley Tribune shows protesters carrying signs and chanting "Wells Fargo, shame on you!" in the street in front of the home.

Wilson is shown crossing a police cordon in her wheelchair to deliver a check to Sloan. She knocks several times, but gets no answer.

"He's embarrassed," Wilson tells the Tribune. "That's why he won't come out. ... He knows that what they are doing is wrong."

Wilson was arrested under the anti-picketing statute, after protesters and police faced off for about two hours. She was released about an hour later and is expected to appear in court in early June.

"The leaders of Wells Fargo and the members of their family should be afforded the right to feel safe in their private residence and we encourage all organizations choosing to demonstrate at private residences to abide by the law for the safety of the general public," the Wells Fargo statement said.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

• Lawyer: Autistic boy's teacher didn't call him 'bastard'
• World record holder for 'longest time to live with a bullet in the head' dies
• Guess who's coming to dinner? Navy family starts unique deployment ritual
• Attorney: Zimmerman's website raised more than $200,000
• Which dress will get you barred from this prom?

Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

Follow Kari Huus on Facebook

Arturo de los Santos lost his home to foreclosure more than a year ago and was evicted. But because he felt he was treated unfairly, he moved back into his home of 10 years in an effort to force the lender, Freddie Mac, to back down.

"I’m just a regular guy who gets up each day, takes the kids to school and goes to work," said de los Santos, a long-time aerospace factory supervisor who served five years in the Marine Corps. Now he is hunkered down in the modest three-bedroom house in Riverside, Calif., surrounded by an encampment of Occupy Riverside protesters and community activists. "We’ve done everything the way we were supposed to. We’re not going to just sit back and let Freddie Mac steal our home."

A new eviction order aimed at forcing de los Santos, a 46, and his family out of the house took effect Tuesday, meaning that sheriff's deputies could arrive at any time. Arturo de los Santos also has been served a court summons threatening him with arrest if he doesn’t leave his house.

---

De los Santos’ story is similar to thousands of other American homeowners who claim that banks mishandled mortgage modifications.

When the economic crisis hit in 2008, the factory where he worked cut his hours, so de los Santos pursued a modification based on his lower income with JP Morgan Chase, servicer of the loan.

De los Santos told NBC Los Angeles that in 2009, the bank initially lowered his payment in a modification but then stopped taking his money.

Before the house foreclosure process was complete, de los Santos’ hours and income returned to pre-crash levels, but he says that JP Morgan Chase and loan holder Freddie Mac rejected his efforts to bring the loan up to date. Instead, his home was foreclosed on and he and his family were evicted.

Gary Kishner, a spokesman for JP Morgan Chase disputes de los Santos’ account, saying he applied multiple times for loan modifications but did not qualify under Freddie Mac’s requirements for participation. The foreclosure went through in November 2010, he said, and ownership reverted to Freddie Mac.

"The loan is no longer in our portfolio," he said. "It’s always been their decision."

Freddie Mac sent msnbc.com a statement on the case by email.

"We have no choice but to re-evict since no payment has been received on his mortgage for two and a half years, the foreclosure process was completed in November 2010 and the house was lawfully vacated and secured in July 2011. The only way to recover the losses taxpayers have taken on the unpaid mortgage is to re-secure and sell the house to a new buyer," according to the statement sent by Doug Duvall, senior director of public relations and corporate marketing at Freddie Mac headquarters in Virginia.

But de los Santos said he has been unable to get Freddie Mac to discuss his loan, a common refrain from homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure.  

The home sat empty for about six months before de los Santos decided to take bold action. He and his family moved back into the home on Dec. 6. Activists from the Occupy movement and the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment launched their "occupation" of the property to bolster his bid to renegotiate on Feb. 2. Since then, said Peter Kuhns, a spokesman for ACCE, there have been 10 to 15 activists present at the house around the clock, and often more.

On Feb. 8, de los Santos and some 250 supporters staged a protest in the lobby of the 48-story office tower in downtown Los Angeles that houses Freddie Mac. They set up a "negotiating table" and sent a letter to the 44^th floor seeking a Freddie Mac manager to explain his rejection for modification.

He and one other person were arrested and charged with trespassing.

A few homeowners who, like de los Santos, have undertaken public "occupation" of their former properties have succeeded in getting a new deal. In October, msnbc.com covered the case of Rose Gudiel, another resident of the Los Angeles area, whose public protests with numerous supporters apparently played a role in forcing Fannie Mae to cancel her eviction and agree to an eleventh-hour loan modification.

But while the "occupation" approach may meet with occasional success, it’s a desperate measure that most lawyers do not recommend.

"It’s trespassing, really, if there has been an eviction order," said Noah Zinner, staff attorney with Housing and Economic Rights Advocates. "It’s problematic because to the extent it involves trespass it can get the people in trouble."

De los Santos is one of the millions of homeowners who will not be helped by the recent $25 billion settlement with four major banks over allegations of improper foreclosures.

The settlement, which includes all but one state, will help lower the principal for about 1 million homeowners who are underwater and behind in their house payments. Another 750,000 people whose properties are worth less than they owe the bank will be able to refinance at a lower interest rate if they up to date on payments.

But loans backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are not part of the settlement.

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News

• Devil in the details: Santorum hardly alone in belief in Satan
• Are Latino voters a missed 2012 opportunity for Republicans?
• Trouble on the ranch: Cattle rustling on the rise in Texas
• 'No-fly' Muslim takes case to court of public opinion

Follow Kari Huus on Facebook

When the end of a longtime relationship cost artist Danica Phelps her home, she used her creative energies to chart the troubled period in her life. The result: A work of art that incorporates an eight-page court ruling that she says pushed her down the path toward foreclosure.

Titled "The Cost of Love," the 25-panel piece weaves 350,000 tiny red-hued stripes -- in shades of cherry, burgundy, peach  and pink – together with words from the ruling, including "animosity," "eviction," "mortgage," "girlfriends," "child," "donor" and "insemination."

"This is the whole decision represented in these panels," Phelps, 40, said recently at Brennan & Griffin, the art gallery that represents her and is showing her work in Manhattan's Lower East Side neighborhood through Sunday. "I didn't want my emotion to be represented. What I wanted was to put out this word for word and to allow the viewer to have their own emotional reaction to it."

---

Phelps, who has used similar striping in previous pieces, said the genesis of her latest creation occurred in 2009, when her relationship with an ex-girlfriend unraveled and she decided to move out of the four-unit apartment building she owned in New York.

After moving in with relatives and unsuccessfully attempting to persuade her ex to move out of the apartment they had shared for three years, Phelps initiated eviction proceedings. 

Once a family
But on June 2, 2010, Housing Court Judge Laurie L. Lau dismissed the case. Because Phelps and her ex-girlfriend had been a “familial unit” when they moved in together and jointly parented a now 3-year-old-boy named Orion born to Phelps through artificial insemination, Lau wrote, the latter was not subject to eviction under New York City law.

"While their relationship has obviously deteriorated into one of animosity and hostility, the evidence establishes the parties had intended to form a lasting familial unit,” the judge said. “It has been held that 'lifetime partners whose relationship is long term and characterized by an emotional and financial commitment and interdependence,' ... satisfy the definition of 'family' for purposes of the Rent Stabilization Code."

Irishman makes 'billion-euro home' from old notes to protest economic 'madness'

Phelps then decided to stop paying the mortgage on the apartment building, which is now in the midst of foreclosure. A real estate agent is trying to help her arrange a short sale (an agreement between a lender, a buyer and a seller in which the lender agree to accept less than the total loan) to avoid that.

She calculates her financial loss at $350,000, hence the number of red stripes in her artwork.

"I know that this show sounds like it’s about the cost of having been in that relationship, but what the meaning is to me actually is the cost of maintaining Orion's happiness and his future," she said of her son. "If I have to lose the house ... I feel like it's actually a small price to pay."

$26 a letter
To make the panels – each of which represents one paragraph of the court decision -- Phelps first counted the numbers of the letters in the text – approximately 13,000 -- and divided 350,000 by that number. That worked out to $26 a letter.

She then took large pieces of paper and drew lines according to the value of each word.

For example, a 13-letter word would be worth $338, and thus would be followed by 338 stripes. She glued words from the judge’s ruling on large pieces of paper and painted the lines around them, using a mix of watercolor and gouache – a form of watercolor with more pigmentation.

The foreclosure crisis, Beverly Hills-style

She then cut the paper into rows and glued them onto birch plywood. At the bottom of each panel is the "cost" represented and the paragraph it represents from the ruling.

Phelps, who had other artists help her with some of her earlier stripe art, said she wanted to do this one herself, even though it took her five months to finish it.

“I felt like each stripe should be painted by me,” she said with a sigh. “It's like letting go of the house, every single penny of it. And once I’ve painted it, it's gone."

She said she found the process peaceful and healing, though some viewers don’t get that sense when they view it.

"People have said, 'Oh it's so dark … all that red is so angry,'” she said. “I look in here and it's glowing to me. … I feel like I accomplished what I set out to, which is to turn something that was depressing to me into something very beautiful."

More content from msnbc.com and NBC News

• Nigerian underwear bomber gets life sentence
• Interracial marriage: Your stories of the good, the bad and the ugly
• NYPD 'courtesy cards' for family, friends sold online
• It's not fracking's fault, study says
• Man wins $3.3 million in mistaken identity bank robbery case
• Schools in bankrupt city work to prove poverty is no barrier to success

As night fell on the previously vacant home on Brooklyn's Vermont Street that was the target of a “liberation” by housing activists and Occupy Wall Street protesters earlier in the day, an illuminated Christmas tree stood in what is, at least for now, the small front yard of the Glasgow-Carrasquillo family's home.

It remains unclear whether authorities or the Bank of America, which owns the mortgage on the two-story brick house, intend to roust the longtime homeless family – Alfredo Carrasquillo, 27, Natasha Glasgow, 30, and children Alfredo, Jr., 5, and Tanisha, 9 – from their new abode. There were police parked on both ends of the block and a van in front of the family’s home, said Sean Barry of VOCAL-NY. Bank of America did not respond to an email seeking comment.

---

As the Carrasquillo-Glasgows got accustomed to their new surroundings, a group of the people responsible for putting a roof over their heads stood outside, discussing logistics and munching on food being distributed from a table on the sidewalk.

 

 

"What we're doing today … should encourage more and more people to ... fight for what their right is: Housing is a right,"” said Dorothy Amadi, a 63-year-old activist who was part of a squatting movement in Brooklyn in the 1980s. "We fought with the city and they gave this organization ... the buildings and we were able to renovate them and put people into apartments, and help put abandoned buildings back ... on the tax rolls, give the city some money to think about," she added with a laugh.

Some protesters had set up a mobile library across the street and were circulating a sign-up sheet for eviction defense -- in case authorities attempted to throw the family out of the foreclosed home.

“There definitely is going to be around-the-clock eviction defense,” said Barry, noting that protesters planned to work in shifts on an indefinite occupation. “Our understanding is that the police won’t take any action unless Bank of America asks them to do so.”

The NYPD did not respond to an email seeking comment. Officers at the scene declined to comment, as well as when contacted by phone.

Rob Robinson, of Take Back the Land, which helped plan the foray, said he hoped the action would encourage people to come out and share their stories of eviction, thereby helping others to overcome the shame and stigma of being foreclosed upon.

"You can only probably help somebody or change somebody's lives by sharing that story. Movements begin with the telling of untold stories," he said. "You need to tell your story, otherwise nobody knows."

Click here to read previous posts on the seizure of the Brooklyn home.

Click here to read complete coverage of the "Occupy" day of action.

The operation to occupy a vacant foreclosed home in Brooklyn on behalf of a homeless family from New York City appears to be a success. The front door of the two-story house on Vermont Street apparently was unlocked when the marchers arrived.

Alfredo Carrasquillo, the father of the homeless family, thanked the marchers for at least temporarily providing them with a home.

“I appreciate every single one of you,” he said. “This is just the beginning; there’s still a lot more work that needs to be done. But I hope that all of you will be here as that work continues.”

---

He then re-entered the home with his wife, Natasha, and two kids. Members of the media were not allowed inside.

 

 

 

Police who escorted the marchers through Brooklyn stopped when the marchers arrived at the home and remained a distance away as the celebration of the “liberation” of the foreclosed home began. A brass band played, people danced and food was passed around as the cleanup crew got down to business.

One of them, Jordan McCarthy, 22, from New Hampshire, walked by carrying two brooms.

"I’m really excited, really glad that I am able to help this family and that we’re fighting for equal housing rights," said McCarthy, who has been a member of the sanitation crew at the Occupy Wall Street protest. "It’s a really important issue.”

Click here to read all the posts on the Brooklyn seizure.

Click here for complete coverage of the "Occupy" day of action.