• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: 'Extreme' Arizona wildfire burns 5,000 acres in just 7 hours
  • Recommended: Alleged 'alphabet murders' killer tells jury, 'I'm not the monster'
  • Recommended: 'Industry of mediocrity': Rookie teachers woefully unprepared, report says
  • Recommended: Colorado's most destructive wildfire mostly contained as officials welcome rain

NBC News reporters bring you compelling stories from across the nation. For more US news, follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 27
    May
    2013
    10:16am, EDT

    Undocumented military cadets molded for success, then cast adrift

    Hannah Rappleye / NBC News

    Abigail Nava, 17, stands in her Class A uniform during morning formation at Chicago's Phoenix Military Academy.

    By Lisa Riordan Seville and Hannah Rappleye, NBC News

    CHICAGO -- On days when she can’t get a ride, Rocio Herrera catches the 6:10 a.m. bus from her poor, largely Hispanic neighborhood on Chicago’s Southwest side for the long trip to Phoenix Military Academy – one of the city’s six public military-themed high schools.

    The military schools are part of the Department of Defense’s Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps program, or JROTC. At most schools, JROTC is an elective that requires a few classes on military history and leadership, after-school activities and wearing a uniform a few times a week. In Chicago Public Schools’ military academies, uniforms and salutes are part of everyday life.

    Immigration Nation

    An in–depth look at immigration in America

    One morning in early April, Herrera and her fellow cadets walked through a metal detector and filed into the gym for formation at 7:35 a.m. As they lined up by company, students adjusted their crisp green jackets.  Herrera wore the blue pressed jacket of a battalion commander, her ribbons straight and patent leather shoes spit-polished.

    Herrera can hold her own on the street. When she feels disrespected, her round face goes hard. In school, the 17-year-old found a way to channel that toughness. Leadership responsibilities have kept her busy this spring, along with thinking about what she’ll wear to prom.

    As for life after graduation in June, Herrera is not sure.

    She said she has always dreamed of joining the military, something she is well-prepared for thanks to JROTC. But that road is closed to her because of what she often calls her “situation”: She is an undocumented immigrant.

    Top of their class
    Herrera’s “situation” is hardly unique.

    Chicago Public Schools runs the largest JROTC program in the nation, with 11,000 students enrolled. Officials there estimate that 10 percent are undocumented immigrants, most of whom entered the country as young children. Nationally, experts believe thousands more are in the program, though legal restrictions on asking about immigration status in public schools make hard numbers impossible to come by.

    Abigail Nava is a standout cadet leader at Chicago's Phoenix Military Academy, but as she's an undocumented student, her dream of attending West Point is just out of reach, for now. NBC's Miguel Alvear reports.

    Military service as a path to citizenship for young undocumented immigrants is a part of the wide ranging bipartisan immigration reform bill introduced in the U.S. Senate in April. The bill would allow young undocumented immigrants like Herrera who arrived as children to apply for a provisional immigration status, and then enter the military. Those who graduate high school and serve four years would then be eligible to apply for citizenship.

    The Pentagon, which faces a shortage of able, accomplished recruits, has supported previous efforts to allow undocumented immigrants to enlist.

    Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee in 2006, then-Under Secretary of Defense David Chu said, “Many of these young people may wish to join the military, and have the attributes needed – education, aptitude, fitness and moral qualifications.”

    But opponents like Roy Beck, founder and CEO of Numbers USA, which advocates for reduced immigration, argue that creating a military path to citizenship is “a step toward a mercenary army.”

    “Taking this to its extreme, do you basically tell everyone in the world, ‘If you come over here and break into the county, and you're young enough, you buy U.S. citizenship by fighting for us?’” he said.

    ‘Unstrategic’
    Todd Connor is a familiar figure at Phoenix. He walks through the halls greeting students with a strident, “Good morning, cadet!” They look up at the slim man in the well-cut suit and reply, “Good morning, sir!”

    Hannah Rappleye / NBC News

    Rocio Herrera, 17, stands outside Phoenix Military Academy.

    Connor became executive director of military programs at Chicago Public Schools about a year ago. He had served as a Navy officer during Operation Iraqi Freedom, then became a successful business consultant. Until recently, he didn’t know much about running high schools.

    The student body at Phoenix is about 72 percent Hispanic and 26 percent black. More than 90 percent of its 409 students qualify for the federal lunch program, a widely used measure of student poverty. Connor saw those numbers and knew they meant: kids statistically more likely to test poorly and drop out, kids who would have a harder time getting to college. But he didn’t think about his cadets’ legal status.

    Retired Army Lt. Col. Victory Harris, commandant  of the JROTC program at Phoenix Military Academy in Chicago, says that rules preventing undocumented students from enlisting in the military mean "we are losing great, great Americans who could contribute to this country."

    That changed in 2011, when Connor was chatting with a group of students about the future. One was senior Alejandro Morales, then Chicago’s highest-ranking cadet. Knowing Morales dreamed of becoming the Marines’ first Hispanic commandant, Connor asked about his plans after graduation. Morales seemed evasive. Connor persisted. Finally, an instructor pulled him aside and said, “Sir, he’s undocumented. He says he wants to go into the military but he can’t.”

    This is, to Connor, “unstrategic.” Morales and others like him were brought to the United States as children and the country has invested public dollars in their educations – yet the system prevents them from serving in the military.

    “It’s both broken and it’s wrong,” Connor said. “At the point when they’re ready to return the investment, we shut the door on them.”


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    Morales couldn’t enlist and was unable to attend college. “In eighth grade I thought that by now things would be different,” Morales said. “By the time I graduated, I’d be able to enlist.”

    He has some hope. A few months ago, the 19-year-old applied for deferred action, the Obama administration policy adopted last year that gives two years of protection from deportation, along with a temporary work permit, to undocumented students in good standing. Morales is now learning to drive a semi.

    ‘Closed Doors’
    Each September, Darci Keyser, one of Phoenix’s two guidance counselors, starts to hear the stories again.

    “The senior year is the most heartbreaking to us as counselors,” she said, reading future heartache on the sheet of junior class rankings fanned on the table in front of her. The names of the undocumented cadets are highlighted in red, clustered at the top. “They’re always our top kids,” Keyser said. “They all get acceptances. They all get scholarship money. But they don’t get enough.”

    Francisco Peralta, 17, ranks first in his class. When he walks past his locker, he gazes up at his certificate of achievement as a 2013-2014 Illinois State Scholar and another marking his perfect attendance all four years. He is no longer the kid who was bullied so badly in sixth grade that his family had to move, or the one who gave up on his grades in middle school. Now, he makes firm eye contact from behind his glasses and matter-of-factly lists his accomplishments.

    Francisco Peralta, a 17-year-old undocumented immigrant and Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps cadet, is graduating atop his senior class at Phoenix Military Academy. His prospects for attending college or enlisting in the military are not bright, but he remains upbeat: "I am undocumented, but I won't let that stop me from reaching my goal."

    Peralta arrived in this country when he was 3. He doesn’t remember Mexico, but for years he has known that his place of birth could prevent him from enlisting in the military, and becoming a scientist. Without a Social Security number, he can’t apply for federal financial aid, and does not qualify for many private scholarships. To go to college, the oldest of five kids needs a full ride scholarship to cover not only tuition, but fees, room, board and books.

    During his junior year, that reality began to creep into his spoken-word poems. He called one “Closed Door”:

    The door is slammed in my face

    so opportunities like those around me I cannot take

    they slip through my hands like sand

    so I am never able to grab

    or take full advantage of this land.

    During senior year, he stayed positive as he mailed off his applications.

    Keyser thought he had a chance. “He’s done everything an undocumented kid can,” she said. “If it’s not happening for him, I don’t know who it will happen to.”

    Peralta’s acceptance letters started arriving early in his senior year. Each offered enthusiastic congratulations, but awards that would only partially cover the bills. The envelope from De Paul University, Peralta’s first choice, came in December. He had earned a scholarship of up to $28,000 over four years. Tuition for his freshman year alone was $33,390.

    When his hopes of winning a prestigious scholarship were dashed, he and his 13-year-old sister Jacqueline cried together. 

    “I worry because what if they don't give him papers,” Jacqueline, who was born in the U.S. and is a citizen, said of her brother. “And all of those years of hard study would be for nothing, and then maybe he's going to end up like one of my parents that have to work … at a really bad job for little pay.”

    Asked about Francisco’s options after graduating, Jacqueline could think of only two. “He could work construction with my uncle and my dad,” she said. “Or he could go to a store, like a fast food store, and try to work there.”

    Hoping for open doors
    The immigration reform legislation being debated in Washington could change things for juniors like Abigail Nava. Her journey to the United States from Mexico when she was 9 remains vivid: a walk of two days and two nights through the Arizona desert. When she started school in Chicago, teachers excoriated her for not picking English up faster. Kids called her “wetback.” In the eighth grade, when she learned Phoenix had accepted her, she cried. 

    The first time she buttoned the jacket of her uniform, “I knew that it was for me,” she said. She’s now commander of the school’s 80-student Charlie Company.

    Earlier this year she began to look into West Point and the Naval Academy, scrolling down the schools’ web pages, checking off her qualifications. When she hit the citizenship requirement, Nava began to understand what Francisco Peralta’s poem meant.

    In the Phoenix gym on that April morning, Nava stepped in front of each member of her company by turn, eyes sharp under her carefully shaped brows, inspecting the uniforms of the cadets to make sure everything was in place.

    She does the same with her life. One day, if her “situation” changes, she plans to be ready. 

    “I don’t really need documents to make me stronger,” she said. Having them “would just open doors.”

    Related story: Dream deferred: Good kid's struggle with immigration policy

     

     

     

     

    393 comments

    But that road is closed to her because of what she often calls her "situation": She is an undocumented immigrant That's not a "situation". and you and your family are NOT "undocumented immigrants". You are illegals....That simple.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: immigration, chicago, military, featured, undocumented-immigrants, immigration-nation, jrtotc
  • 2
    May
    2013
    4:08am, EDT

    May Day protests turn violent in Seattle; thousands march in LA

    Ted S. Warren / AP

    A Seattle Police officer with a baton tries to fend off protesters during a May Day anti-capitalism protest that ended with demonstrators clashing with police on Wednesday.

    By Eric M. Johnson, Reuters

    SEATTLE -- Protesters clashed with police in Seattle on Wednesday as a May Day rally that began peacefully turned violent after dark, with demonstrators hurling objects at officers who responded with flash-bang grenades and pepper spray.

    One protester was seen using a skateboard to smash windows at a Walgreens drug store in the city's Capitol Hill neighborhood, and others overturned trash cans and lined up newspaper display racks to block police.

    Matt Mills Mcknight / Reuters

    A demonstrator attempts to break a window of a pharmacy in Seattle's Capitol Hill neighborhood during May Day demonstrations Wednesday.

    Officers in riot gear, some riding in armored SWAT vehicles, repeatedly used the flash-bang grenades and tried to disperse the crowd.

    Seattle police said that as of 9 p.m. local time (12 p.m. ET), 11 adults and two juveniles had been arrested for assaults and property damage. Several people were shown on local TV stations being taken into custody.

    Seattle police said in a tweet that one officer was injured by a thrown object. His condition was not immediately clear.

    The violence broke out as darkness fell in Seattle following a day of May Day rallies in cities across the U.S. West that were planned by a coalition of organized labor activists, students, civil rights advocates and members of the clergy to call for an overhaul of immigration laws.

    In Los Angeles, thousands of protesters marched through downtown waving American flags and carrying signs with the slogan, "Stop deportations."

    The demonstrators chanted in Spanish, "Obama! Escucha! Estamos en la lucha!" ("Obama! Listen! We are in the fight!"), as they marched down one of downtown's main thoroughfares.

    Thousands of people across the nation took to the streets to protest for immigration reform and immigrant workers rights. NBC's Ayman Mohyeldin reports.  

    The march spanned across more than two large city blocks, and one police officer told Reuters that unofficial estimates put the size of the crowd at roughly 3,500 people. No arrests were reported.

    In Arizona, where a state crackdown against illegal immigration was signed into law three years ago, several hundred people joined a late-afternoon rally outside the state Capitol in Phoenix, ahead of a march through downtown.

    The protests come about two weeks after a bipartisan group of U.S. senators introduced an 844-page bill, backed by President Barack Obama, that would rewrite many U.S. immigration laws.

    A centerpiece of the measure would create a path to legal status and ultimately citizenship for many of the 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States.

    It also aims to secure the U.S. border with Mexico against illegal entry and to make it easier for industry, particularly high-tech businesses and agriculture, to hire workers from abroad when needed.

    Related:

    Occupy LA sues city over mass detentions

    NBC News in depth: Immigration Nation

    Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

    1302 comments

    Treat the Los Angeles protesters just like Mexico would; Arrest them all and let them rot in jail.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: immigration, violence, police, protests, seattle, los-angeles, featured, may-day
  • 28
    Apr
    2013
    4:19pm, EDT

    Money can't buy love, but it can open the door to US citizenship

    John Brecher / NBC News

    Svetlana Anikeeva is expecting a green card any day now after she and her husband invested $500,000 in the construction of a Seattle office and retail space.

    By Andrew Rafferty, Staff Writer, NBC News

    While most U.S. residents cannot put a price tag on the value of citizenship, Svetlana Anikeeva and her husband can -- $500,000.

    Immigration Nation

    An in–depth look at immigration in America

    That’s because the Russian immigrants came to the U.S. through the EB-5 visa program, a federal initiative that allows foreigners to earn a green card granting them permanent residency – and a path to citizenship – in return for investing at least $500,000 in an American business and creating at least 10 jobs.

    For Anikeeva, she knew after spending her junior year of high school in Savannah, Ga., that she wanted to one day call America home.

    The student’s return to the United States was not immediate or certain. She went home to Vladivostok, attended college, then spent seven years in Japan with her husband and daughter, helping run the family’s luxury automobile export business.

    But as their daughter grew, Anikeeva and her husband decided they wanted her to have the advantages that come with an American education. And they were willing to pay to make it happen.

    "It was most of everything we had at the moment,” Anikeeva said of the money.


    It was a calculated risk, but one that Anikeeva felt would give her daughter the best shot at an education in the United States. In 2009, Anikeeva sent her application to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and, after it was approved, invested in an office and retail space in downtown Seattle. Now, she’s waiting by her mailbox in Redmond, Wash., for what she hopes will be a permanent green card.

    "My American friends, they don’t realize that the simple fact they were born here is worth $500,000," she said.

    Svetlana Anikeeva sees greater opportunity for her daughter in the United States than in her native Russia. To become U.S. citizens, she and her husband invested a half million dollars in a commercial office development.

    For reasonably deep-pocketed immigrants like Anikeeva, the program is a win-win. It allows investors and their direct family to earn permanent green card status while pumping money into the American economy. The program, which began in 1990, has been growing in recent years, with some in the U.S. business community using it to fund projects in the midst of a slow economic recovery.

    Since the financial collapse of 2008, the number of applications for EB-5 visas has risen dramatically. During fiscal 2007, just 776 foreign investors applied for visas, a number that ballooned to 6,040 last year. This year could be the first time it reaches the 10,000 visa cap.

    Citizenship is the driver
    Over the past seven years, foreign investors who have applied have had a good record of being approved, with around 80 percent getting into the EB-5 program, according U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services statistics. More than 85 percent of those investors were ultimately granted permanent green cards.

    Foreign investors who participate in the program nearly all do so for the chance at citizenship, not profit, according to Miami-based immigration lawyer David Hart. "Generally speaking, they are not looking to make a substantial return. What they are interested in obviously in getting their green card then trying to ensure that the jobs will be created so that their green card is maintained," he said.

    The easiest and most common way for most foreign investors to go about the process is through a regional center. There are currently 287 throughout the U.S., all staffed by immigration lawyers who help clients navigate paperwork and find projects that will ultimately allowthem to stay in the U.S. for as long as they want. They help USCIS verify that jobs have in fact been created. Those jobs can range from waiters working in a new restaurant built with EB-5 money to construction workers building a new retail space.

    Regional centers also help investors in what can be the most difficult part of the process – verifying and vetting where the funds are coming from. The government spends a huge amount of time verifying that the funds were not obtained illegally or sourced back to an entity deemed hostile to the United States.

    Once an application is approved, investors are granted a two-year conditional visa while their project gets underway. If all works out, a permanent green card is issued and investors are free to live anywhere in the United States.

    Many regional centers sprung up after the economic collapse of 2008. Immigration experts like Hart, who has been an immigration lawyer for more than 20 years, saw the program as an opportunity. In March 2009, he gained approval to start the South Florida Investment Regional Center, which is working to renovate the Astor Hotel in Miami Beach using EB-5 funding from 16 would-be immigrants.

    "Around that time the economy was going south, so to speak, and banks weren't lending money. And so EB-5 is a source of cheap capital. ... With my background in immigration law, I recognized that opportunity existed," he said.

    Many of the projects are centered on service industries, like hotels and restaurants, that have the potential to create plenty of jobs quickly. 

    But investors, lawyers and business owners point to the slow pace with which investments are approved by Immigration Services as one of the program’s biggest downfalls. Some foreigners originally interested in coming to the United States turn to other countries with similar programs that move faster, they say. And with the program’s popularity growing, the delays are only getting worse.

    Hart also contends the government can be inconsistent on what does or does not get approved. He says he has experienced the USCIS originally approving a project, only to change its guidelines after the investment is under way.

     "That lack of predictability makes it very difficult for any business to really get off the ground," he said.

     The program also frustrates some who administer it. Jim Ziglar, who headed USCIS under President George W. Bush, said the program was not popular among those in immigration services because of the perception that it was a way for some people to pay their way to the front of the line.

     “There is a certain crassness in the American mind that somebody, if they happen to have $500,000, they can buy their way into the U.S.,” he said.

     Ziglar recognizes some of the merits of the program, but hopes to see the $500,000 minimum raised to increase the economic impact. That number has not changed since the program’s inception in the early 1990s.

    Anikeeva has no patience for those who see the EB-5 program as un-American, allowing foreigners to buy their way into the country. She says the work her family did to raise the funds and go through the investment process was just as difficult as any other pathway to the United States. 

    That’s why she’s waiting by her mailbox in Washington, hoping for word that her temporary green card has been made permanent.

    If all goes well from there, she plans to begin the process of becoming a U.S. citizen. 

    "I think the wedding day is supposed to be the happiest day of one's life? I think the day of my citizenship will be the happiest day of my life," she said.

    Related links:

    NBC News' series: Immigration Nation

    Through the obstacle course of immigration, many paths to citizenship 

    To get green cards, these immigrants must prove they are extraordinary

    By the numbers: How America tallies its 11.1 million undocumented immigrants 

    Waiting half a life for a green card: Families languish in immigration line

    For asylum seekers, path to citizenship is paved with peril

    'Ready to die for my new country'; gaining quick citizenship in combat boots

    407 comments

    Federal law specifically states that any alien granted entry into the United States must be financially self-sufficient so as not to become a “public charge” dependent on welfare. So, yeah, they deserve and have earned a green card. ...meanwhile illegal aliens cross the border, crank out …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: immigration, immigrants, money, citizenship, green-card, immigration-nation
  • 27
    Apr
    2013
    6:47am, EDT

    'Ready to die for my new country': Gaining quick citizenship in combat boots

    David Friedman / NBC News

    Oumama Kabli, center, celebrates becoming a U.S. citizen during a naturalization ceremony on April 15 at the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Kabli, 19, is a private in the Army National Guard and entitled to become a citizen without the normal five-year residency requirement because of her military service.

    By Bill Briggs, NBC News contributor

    This story is part of NBC News’ series “Immigration Nation,” an in-depth examination of immigration in America.

    A wartime edict to entice immigrants to join the military in exchange for rapid naturalization has created 83,000 new American citizens. But one critic worries the initiative will become permanent — or perhaps even expand — essentially outsourcing more U.S. combat jobs and, he argues, injecting the armed forces with an increased security risk.  

    Immigration Nation

    An in–depth look at immigration in America

    Launched via a 2002 executive order by President George W. Bush, the program lets green-card holders who enlist in the U.S. armed services bypass the typical five-year residency rule and apply immediately for citizenship at no fee. More than 10 percent of such naturalization ceremonies have taken place in 28 countries abroad, including 3,412 in Iraq, 2,102 in Japan and 1,134 in South Korea, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, or USCIS, which administers the process.

    In 2008, a one-year pilot program – called Military Accessions Vital to National Interest (MAVNI) – was approved. The program allowed the armed services to tap non-citizens without green cards — here on temporary visas or under refugee or asylum status — to naturalize to help bolster branch needs for specific language or medical skills. “The initial pilot program ran through December 31, 2009 and had a cap of 1,000 total recruits for all services,” Pentagon spokesman Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen told NBC News.

    Last May, the program was brought back for an additional two years with a cap of 1,500, he said. Thus far, the Army has enlisted fewer than 600 soldiers, and no other branch has used the MAVNI authority.

    “I feel like I’m living the American dream,” said Oumama Kabli, 19, who was naturalized April 15 during a ceremony at the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C.

    Born to a Moroccan mother and raised in Canada, she moved with her mom to Virginia to finish high school and attend college. She’s now an Army National Guard private with plans to enter officer training. (Only U.S. citizens are eligible to become commissioned officers). A Muslim, Kabli believes “it’s an advantage for the Army to have people familiar with the religion or the culture” when troops deploy to predominantly Muslim nations.

    'Citizenship meant everything'
    Just as her Moroccan stepfather did in 2004.

    “I actually left (Army) basic training, got my naturalization on Friday and was on the plane to Iraq on Saturday morning,” said Youssef Mandour, 31, who worked as a translator, reaching the rank of sergeant. He pulled a second tour of Iraq from 2009 to 2011, working on reconstruction efforts for the State Department.

    “Citizenship meant everything. At that point, I was ready to die for my new country,” added Mandour, who arrived from Morocco on a tourist visa at age 17. Today, he owns a defense contracting company in Virginia. “I’m so proud of Oumama. By making her a U.S. citizen it’s going to create that diversity we’re missing in Iraq and Afghanistan. She will be more received by (Muslim) nations than the normal officers from, say, Alabama.”

    Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

    Ending the current naturalization-through-service program would require a new White House executive order, said USCIS spokesman Daniel Cosgrove. All military candidates must pass brief civics and English language tests and then undergo background checks for serious criminal histories or possible affiliations with terrorist groups.

    “The thing I’m concerned about is not what’s happening now in the military but what could happen if the Pentagon and politicians get too enamored of this idea of non-citizens joining the military,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a nonpartisan research organization in Washington, D.C., that advocates tighter immigration policies.

    The White House won’t rescind the 11-year program, Krikorian predicts, even after the scheduled 2014 pullout of American troops from Afghanistan, and “it will become a de facto feature of military life.” Further, that immigrant pipeline may be enlarged, he added, “if we open up the officer corps to non-citizens.” In that scenario, he foresees many foreign students joining in order to stay in America permanently.

    Slideshow: Your newest fellow Americans

    John Moore / Getty Images

    Nearly 700,000 immigrants take the step to U.S. citizenship each year. Meet some of those who have just become part of that select group: Americans.

    Launch slideshow

    'All bad things can start small'
    But if global events transpire that compel the branches to rapidly expand their ranks, he also can imagine a scenario in which the military perhaps further loosens the rules, allowing foreigners abroad to enlist and serve by dangling citizenship as “their compensation.”

    "You have the real possibility of soldiering becoming a job that Americans won’t do — just like the Roman empire, not to get too melodramatic about it," Krikorian said. "That’s not something that’s around the corner. But all bad things can start small."

    An armed force composed of a far higher share of noncitizens also could boost the security risks for all soldiers and intelligence officers, he added. 

    "Being an immigrant or from a recent-immigrant family just adds an additional layer of concern, as we saw with Maj. Nidal (Hasan), the Fort Hood shooter, or Army veteran Ali Mohamed, one of the leaders of the (1998) African embassy bomb attacks," Krikorian said. "The vulnerability to blackmail also increases if the target has family members outside the U.S. who can be threatened — drug cartels have used this tactic to compromise Customs or Immigration agents with relatives in Mexico.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    "For the ordinary soldier, my main concern is still numbers. The question is: How many noncitizens are being recruited by the military, and are there any restrictions” on how many green-card holders and temporary visa holders can the armed forces approach in a given year?  

    'The U.S. is my new home'
    Pentagon spokesman Maj. Erik Brine responded: “We have no restrictions or limits on the recruitment of foreign nationals who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence.”

    Today, about 35,000 formerly foreign troops span active-duty, National Guard and reserve units, according to the Department of Defense. (That equates to 1.3 percent of the total force strength). The policy was first used during the Revolutionary War when the federal government allowed noncitizens to enlist and it was revived during the War of 1812, the Civil War and both World Wars.

    New U.S. citizens serve the modern branches in a variety of roles, including health care, languages, aviation, logistics and infantry. Christensen, the Pentagon's spokesman, said they "will continue to play a vital role in the U.S. Military."

    David Friedman / NBC News

    Oumama Kabli, right, celebrates with her mother, Sanaa Mandour, after becoming a U.S. citizen during a naturalization ceremony on Monday, April 15, at the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C.

    “I am excited that I get to be part of a nation that I’m serving,” said Oumama Kabli. “I’ll always be a Canadian at heart. But the U.S. is my new home, my new adoptive country. It has taken me under its wing. This is where I’m going to live my life.”

    “She got to see the process I went through. I’ve told her, ‘I used to be like you but I joined the service,’” added Mandour. “It’s like the iron that shines you up. She wants to help people. I told her that’s the best way that you can help people.”

    Related stories:

    • NBC News' series: Immigration Nation
    • Through the obstacle course of immigration, many paths to citizenship 
    • To get green cards, these immigrants must prove they are extraordinary
    • By the numbers: How America tallies its 11.1 million undocumented immigrants 
    • Waiting half a life for a green card: Families languish in immigration line
    • For asylum seekers, path to citizenship is paved with peril

    696 comments

    Having someone afforded the opportunity to be a US citizen openly say, "in their heart they'll always be Canadian," especially when they will be afforded access to classified material in their job, doesn't leave me with a warm fuzzy. If you are that loyal to Canada- go back there. Please. We want ci …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: iraq, afghanistan, muslim, immigration, pentagon, military, citizenship, featured, department-of-defense, enlistment, military-service, immigration-nation
  • Updated
    19
    Apr
    2013
    12:53pm, EDT

    Boston bombing spurs Senate debate on tighter immigration screening

    By Tom Curry, National Affairs Writer, NBC News

    Jason Reed / Reuters

    Senator Chuck Schumer, part of the U.S. Senate's "Gang on Eight", speaks during a news briefing on Capitol Hill, April 18, 2013.

    The Boston Marathon bombing and subsequent manhunt for suspects has already become part of the debate over immigration reform in Washington, with one high ranking Republican questioning the screening process that allows immigrants into the United States.

    The Senate Judiciary Committee was scheduled to hear testimony from Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano on the bipartisan immigration overhaul introduced by a group of eight senators, but she had to postpone due to ongoing developments in the search.

    A ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said at the outset of the committee’s hearing, “Given the events of this week, it’s important for us to understand the gaps and loopholes in our immigration system. While we don’t yet know the immigration status of the people who have terrorized the communities in Massachusetts, when we find out it will help shed light on the weaknesses of our system.” 

    Grassley asked, “How can individuals evade authorities and plan such attacks on our soil? How can we beef up security checks on people who wish to enter the United States? How do we ensure that people who wish to do us harm are not eligible for benefits under the immigration laws, including this new bill before us?”

    But a few minutes later, Sen. Charles Schumer, D- N.Y. the chief sponsor of the bipartisan immigration overhaul, in an apparent response to Grassley, said one shouldn’t jump to conclusions about the events in Boston “or try to conflate those events with this legislation. In general, we’re a safer country when law enforcement knows who is here – has their fingerprints, photos, et cetera – has conducted background checks and no longer needs to look at needles in haystacks. In addition, both the refugee program and the asylum program have been significantly strengthened in the past five years such that we are much more careful about screening people and determining who should and should not be coming into the country. If there are any changes our homeland security experts tell us need to be made (in his bill), I’m committed to making them….”

    In a statement Friday, Frank Sharry, head of America’s Voice Education Fund and a veteran campaigner for an immigration overhaul which would allow a path to legal residence for some of those in the country illegally, said, "It’s premature to jump to final conclusions about the attackers. And it’s shameful that some on the far right are politicizing and demagoguing this issue.” Sharry said some -- whom he did not identify -- are "exploiting this tragedy in hopes of derailing immigration reform."

    The Senate will likely debate the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” immigration overhaul next month, but Grassley stressed that the bill ought to be fully debated in committee and open to amendments on the Senate floor.

    Referring to the 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli immigration overhaul which was supposed to end illegal immigration and prevent any future amnesty, Grassley said, “We screwed up – and we can’t afford to screw up again.”

    The committee was hearing Friday from two witnesses, conservative attorney Peter Kirsanow – who indicated his opposition to the bipartisan bill because he said it would lower wages for U.S. low-skill workers -- and former director of Congressional Budget Office Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who supported the bill.

     

    Related links:

    Suspects to carjack victim: We are the bombers 

     

    Who are the brothers accused of the Boston Marathon bombing? 

    An empty metropolis: Photos show deserted streets of Boston  

    What we know: Timeline of terror hunt

    ‘Dedicated officer’ gunned down by Boston Marathon suspects at MIT

    Slideshow: Bombings at Boston Marathon

    Boston bombing spurs Senate debate on tighter immigration screening 

    Photos from Bostonians locked down amid terror hunt 

    Tweeting police chatter creates confusion over Boston suspect

     

    This story was originally published on Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:47 AM EDT

    1289 comments

    AWESOME! Now the Republicans are behind closing loopholes!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, immigration, terrorism, boston, capitol-hill, ma, featured, mit, watertown, manhunt, updated, appfeatured, boston-marathon-bombing, dzhokar-sarnaev
  • 17
    Apr
    2013
    4:40am, EDT

    For asylum seekers, path to citizenship is paved with peril

    John Makely / NBC News

    After writing a controversial open letter criticizing Iran's supreme leader, human rights activist Parvaneh Vahidmanesh knew her life would be in danger if she went home. After gaining asylum, she settled in Washington, D.C., where she is seen here on April 2.

    By Petra Cahill, Staff Writer, NBC News

    This is story is part of NBC News’ series “Immigration Nation,” an in-depth examination of immigration in America

    Immigrants seeking U.S. citizenship often run substantial risks for their chance at a new life, but none have more on the line than asylum seekers.

    Parveneh Vahidmanesh, an Iranian student who was visiting the United States when controversial elections in her homeland triggered demonstrations and a bloody crackdown on protesters in 2009, typifies the stakes when political activism collides with authoritarian regimes.

    Immigration Nation

    An in–depth look at immigration in America

    When she learned of the crackdown, Vahidmanesh wrote an open letter in the Wall Street Journal criticizing Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – an expression of outrage that, in the estimation of U.S. authorities, would have immediately put her in mortal danger if she returned home.

    “The article was my responsibility to my people and my friends,” said Vahidmanesh, now 32. “I didn’t think about the risk and danger to my future. I just wrote it.”

    The United States guarantees asylum – and a path to citizenship – to individuals who are in the country and can prove they have suffered persecution or have a legitimate fear that they will suffer persecution if they return to their home country, as a result of their politics, race, nationality or membership in a particular social group. There is no cap on the number of "asylees" who can be admitted annually.

    (Separately, the U.S. grants “refugee” status to qualifying individuals outside the United States who are of “special humanitarian concern.” Each year the president and Congress establish a ceiling for the number of refugees admitted. In 2011, for instance, the number was 80,000.)

    Source: U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services; U.S. Justice Department; U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

    To win asylum, candidates must prove their case – through interviews with immigration officials or by appearing before an immigration judge – or be returned to their country of origin. The burden of proof is high: 86,053 applicants sought asylum in the U.S. in 2012, but only 24,969 – about 29 percent – received it, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

    Within the asylum path to citizenship, there are two types of cases: affirmative and defensive. Affirmative cases are filed by applicants who are legally in the country at the time, while defensive cases are filed to prevent forcible deportation, possibly after being caught with false papers at a port of entry or being found in the country illegally or in violation of their immigration status. 

    Vahidmanesh’s case is an example of an affirmative case.

    A human rights activist who had already been hauled in for questioning by Iranian authorities months earlier for documenting  the Islamic republic’s dwindling Jewish population, Vahidmanesh was studying in the U.S. at the invitation of the University of Virginia when the post-election violence reached its peak.

    'I just decided to do something'
    She said that when she saw video showing the death of 26-year-old Neda Soltan, who became the worldwide face of the uprising after she was shot during a protest, she could no longer remain silent.

    “At that time, I was very emotional,” Vahidmanesh said from Washington, D.C., where she now lives and works. “Every day I cried. I see my country under fire and I just decided to do something.”

    Why is it so important to become a U.S. citizen? At recent swearing in ceremonies in Los Angeles, we asked our newest citizens that question.

    That something was an open letter addressed, “Dear Ali Khamenei,” in which she pointed out that the Iranian supreme leader’s daughter – a former classmate of Vahidmanesh’s who was nearly the same age as Soltan – was safe while the young protester was dead for trying to express her opinion.

    Vahidmanesh sought asylum shortly after her letter was published by the newspaper, arguing that the Iranian government would be certain to target her for reprisal if she returned home.

    She was fortunate to get an attorney – something many asylum seekers must do without – provided pro bono by Human Rights First, an independent advocacy group that matches lawyers with asylum candidates trying to navigate the immigration system.

    Her case was persuasive, and she was granted asylum two weeks after her interview with an immigration official.

    Vahidmanesh was spared having to plead her case in a courtroom-like proceeding before an immigration judge, the setting where defensive asylum cases play out.

    Defensive applicants must present physical evidence, provide witnesses and document conditions in their home country – based on State Department reports – to prove they were persecuted at home or would be if they went back.

    Many defensive asylum seekers are held in prison-like detention centers around the country before they get their day in court. The Department of Homeland Security detained 429,000 immigrants, including asylum seekers, in more than 250 detention facilities at some point during 2011, according to the ACLU.

    Attorney Vanessa Allyn, who has advised in hundreds of asylum cases for Human Rights First, says the biggest pitfall for asylum seekers is lack of legal representation.

    “They don’t speak the language, and many have never encountered a legal system – much less a legal system like that of the United States – before,” said Allyn. 

    The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services agency doesn’t keep statistics on the number of asylum seekers who have legal representation, but Allyn said Human Rights First’s pro bono lawyers win 90 percent of their asylum cases, while the overall success rate is about 25 percent.

    At home in the uniform
    Ahmed Fadiga, who fled his native Ivory Coast in December 2004, spent seven months in detention before he appeared in court. He won his case, then swapped the blue-on-blue uniform of the detention center for Army fatigues in order to get citizenship.

    Courtesy Ahmed Fadiga

    Ahmed Fadiga poses with his wife, Jocelyn, and sons Ismael and Ahmed Jr. in January at his welcome home ceremony at Fort Carson, in Colorado Springs, Colo., after a yearlong deployment to Afghanistan.

    “The Army, it’s like my second family,” Spc. Fadiga, 34, said in a recent phone interview from Colorado Springs, where he is based with the Army 2nd Aviation Regiment, 2nd Infantry Division, at Fort Carson.

    Fadiga left his West African homeland in the wake of civil war. As a vocal member of the main opposition political party, Fadiga said, he was beaten, tortured and imprisoned by the ruling party’s militia. He went into hiding, but military thugs who went to his home killed his mother when they failed to find him, according to documents presented in his asylum case.

    Fadiga traveled to the United States with false papers – something he said he admitted immediately upon arrival -- and requested political asylum.

    As far as Immigration Customs Enforcement officials were concerned, however, he had sought entry with a stolen passport, so he was thrown in detention in New Jersey until his case could be heard.  

    Again, thanks to pro bono legal counsel, Fadiga won asylum. But that’s when his journey to become an American citizen really began.

    Asylum is just the first step on a long road to citizenship. “Asylees” are authorized to work immediately and can apply for a green card granting permanent residence after one year. But they must hold the green card for five years before they can apply for citizenship. And they are not given preference in their application for citizenship, according to the USCIS.

    After nearly four years of trying to make it in America – studying English, working menial jobs and taking classes at a community college – Fadiga decided to join the military to get citizenship more quickly, and for free.

    Within six months of joining the Army, he became a naturalized citizen.

    He is now a fuel specialist and recently returned from a one-year deployment in Afghanistan. His wife, Jocelyn, 27, joined him here from the Ivory Coast and is in dental school, when she’s not taking care of their two sons, Ismael, 8, and Ahmed Fadiga Jr., 3 –  both U.S. citizens.  

    Fadiga said he expected some discrimination in the Army – as an African and practicing Muslim – but that’s not what he found. “We all get treated the same. That really surprised me. And at the same time, it made me feel like a true American,” he said.

    Was it all worth it?

    “Absolutely,” said Fadiga. “Besides getting to be a citizen, I got a job that helps me to provide for my family.”

    Vahidmanesh also feels a debt to this country. She now works at the Freedom House, a non-government organization that champions freedom around the world, on the Iran desk. She plans to apply for citizenship in five years when she becomes eligible.

    She says the U.S. “saved my life, my future, my children” – even though she doesn’t yet have any. “If I was in Iran, I would never try to be mother.”

    Related links:

    NBC News' series: Immigration Nation

    Through the obstacle course of immigration, many paths to citizenship 

    To get green cards, these immigrants must prove they are extraordinary

    By the numbers: How America tallies its 11.1 million undocumented immigrants 

    Waiting half a life for a green card: Families languish in immigration line

    165 comments

    Once again someone enters this country illegally and the government bends over backwards for them and we the tax payer ends up with the bill. In F**ing credible!!!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: immigration, citizenship, featured, asylum, immigration-nation
  • 13
    Apr
    2013
    6:46pm, EDT

    Reporter's notebook: Visiting the graves of fallen immigrants

    Despite a dramatic drop in illegal immigration nationwide, south Texas, along the Rio Grande, is now seeing a rise in immigrants crossing the Mexican border, as many flee the poverty and violence in Central America. NBC's Mark Potter reports.

    By Al Henkel, Producer, NBC News 

    Immigration Nation

    An in–depth look at immigration in America

    FALFURRIAS, TEXAS --  Benny Martinez, the Chief Deputy of the Brooks County Sheriff’s office, gets out of his truck to give us a tour of the Falfurrias Burial Park.  

    It’s depressing and sad. 

    We’re just across the road from the Brooks County Fairgrounds.

    Headstones are neat, well-maintained. Most date from the turn of the century, resting places for the founders of this region, hardscrabble ranchers who fought dust and heat and drought to build huge cattle ranches and oil fields in the fields of scrub brush and thorny mesquite trees.


    Tucked in several corners, and now spilling over to the very edge of the property, are more than 100 lost souls. No headstones, just cheap metal markers, most with an ID number and some variation of the words: “Unknown Remains,” “Bones,” “Unknown Female.”

    Last year the county buried 68 unknown people here, presumably undocumented immigrants trying to walk north, who didn’t make it.  Officials found a total of 129 people dead in the brush.

    “Some of them are what you call OTM, 'Other Than Mexicans,' from Central America,” said Martinez.  “They die because either they get ill during the walk, or they weren't aware as to what it was going to take to do the walk.”

    Benny Martinez, Chief Deputy Brooks County,Texas points out unmarked graves of  to NBC's Mark Potter and explains the frustration of illegal border crossing through his county.

    The “walk” is the trek from the border into the interior of the United States. Brooks County is well north of the Rio Grande. There is one main road, U.S. Highway 281, going through the area, which sports a Border Patrol checkpoint just south of Falfurrias.

    Immigrants try to beat the checkpoint by walking around it. So far this year, 73 people have not made it.  The terrain is hostile at best, with few landmarks and little available water.  But it is the shortest route to the major cities, San Antonio, Houston, Austin, where immigrants can get lost in the population, and effectively disappear.

    “They all want to get into the United States. This is the ‘land of the free’ and ‘get solid wages and make a life for yourself,’” said Martinez.  “The trending is going up, still up and maintaining.  It hasn't gone down at all, not here.  I’m guessing the flow is going to continue, or increase more.”

    The Rio Grande Valley sector of the US-Mexico border is the most active spot in the nation for illegal immigrant traffic. Last year saw an increase of 65 percent in the number of people caught, and this year already shows a 55 percent increase over that.

    “It’s overwhelming,” said Martinez, shaking his head. “And we are 75 miles north of the river.”

    Martinez, a life-long resident of Brooks County, says talk of immigration reform, or hints of any policy remotely resembling amnesty, means more people trying to make “the walk,” with no way to stop it. 

    “I don't see us really shutting this thing down.  I don’t see it.  Because I just think it's going to increase the volume,” he said. “It has to, it just makes sense it'll increase the volume of people coming across."

    And with that increase in traffic, comes the possibility of more bodies found out in the brush.

    In the past week, three more were found.  

    160 comments

    This is what happens when you break the law!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: immigration, featured, graveyard, unidentified, immigrant-deaths, immigration-nation
  • 12
    Apr
    2013
    6:05pm, EDT

    Waiting half a life for a green card: Families languish in immigration line

    Max Whittaker / Prime for NBC News

    Sergio Garcia poses for a portrait in Chico, Calif., on April 2. Though he earned a law degree and has passed the state bar exam, Garcia, an undocumented immigrant, is not allowed by the state to practice law. He's spent most of his life trying to gain citizenship.

    By Miranda Leitsinger, Staff Writer, NBC News

    This article, the third in a series on the paths to citizenship, is part of NBC News’ special report “Immigration Nation,” an in-depth examination of immigration in America. 

    Immigration Nation

    An in–depth look at immigration in America

    For Sergio Garcia, the magic number is 25. That's how many years he will have waited for his green card if, as he estimates, he gets it in 2019.

    Garcia, 36, is one of millions of immigrants seeking a green card, or legal permanent residency in the U.S., which he has called home for most of his life. His dad, a naturalized citizen from Mexico, sponsored him, and he was approved to begin the naturalization process in 1995 at age 17.

    But like many other applicants, Garcia has to wait for a green card to become available since quotas limit the number given out annually. Authorities first told him it would take three to five years to reach his “priority date” – when he could start the five-year process of getting a green card.

    “I was crying about that. I’m like … how am I going to survive five years without my documents?” he recalled recently from Durham, a community outside Chico, Calif. “Little did I know that almost 19 years later I would still be in the same shape. … You’re approved but just wait around … half of your life.”


    Aspiring citizens like Garcia face decades-long waits, ever-changing laws and an unwieldy bureaucracy that leads applicants on an epic odyssey to the “American dream.”

    As Congress prepares to unveil its long-awaited immigration reform, many would-be immigrants are hoping it provides a viable legal way for them to join their families in the U.S., with reasonable wait times they feel will discourage unlawful immigration.

    Why is it so important to become a U.S. citizen? At recent swearing in ceremonies in Los Angeles, we asked our newest citizens that question.

    The U.S. immigration system was refashioned in the mid-1960s to focus on family unification, though critics say it has hardly lived up to that ideal.

    Now, applications for family-sponsored green cards represent the vast majority of requests for legal permanent U.S. residency: 4.3 million of the roughly 4.4 million applications on the waiting list as of November came from parents, adult/minor children, adult siblings or married couples, according to the State Department.

    The previous national-origins-based system  was “very discriminatory” in prioritizing Europeans over Asians and Latin Americans, said Doris Meissner, commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service from 1993 to 2000.

    NBCLatino.com

    Click to enlarge.

    In a bid to provide an even-handed approach, limits were placed on how many family-sponsored and employment-based visas could be issued to immigrants from a single country. Today, that ceiling stands at 7 percent of the total. (There is an exception for spouses, minor children and parents of U.S. citizens, who go to the head of the line.)

    But lengthy lines built up for countries with high numbers of applicants, such as Mexico, the Philippines, India and China, said Meissner, now head of the Migration Policy Institute’s U.S. immigration policy program.

    “It’s become increasingly clear that this is just really a perverse set of outcomes that the people who thought about the ’65 act and passed it … wouldn’t have contemplated,” Meissner said. “To make family reunification be meaningful and make it be real, you just can’t have people waiting 20 years. I mean you shouldn’t even have spouses and children waiting two or three years.”

    'Overpromising and under-delivering'
    Some advocates of stricter immigration controls think these lines shouldn’t exist at all, saying family-sponsored green cards should only go to the minor children and spouses of U.S. citizens.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    The waiting list “creates a political pressure for advocacy groups to demand higher caps,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a nonpartisan research organization in Washington, D.C. “… They point to it and they say, ‘Look, this is unjust and we have to speed family immigration.’ It’s become a talking point.”

    There is “no good answer” to cases like Garcia’s, he added.

    “That’s the kind of thing that happens when you have a bad immigration policy that is jury-rigged and complicated and opaque,” he said. “The goal needs to be to define as clearly as possibly who gets in and then let everybody who qualifies in every year … and make clear that if you are the brother of a U.S. citizen there is no category for you, there is no line, so don’t get in it. The problem is overpromising and under-delivering.”

    Garcia's story is in many ways typical of undocumented immigrant residents treading the family path to a green card, lawyers and experts say. His father had a green card but was not yet a U.S. citizen when he applied for his son, putting Garcia in a lower-priority category even though he was under 21 – the age when minor children become adults under U.S. immigration rules.

    His dad became a citizen in 1999, which would have put Garcia on the fast track as the child of a U.S. citizen had he not turned 21 the previous year. Instead, he entered another line: unmarried adult children of U.S. citizens. Immigration is today handling those cases from Mexico dating to Aug. 1, 1993.

    NBCLatino.com

    Click to enlarge

    That may appear close to Garcia’s priority date of Nov. 18, 1994, but don’t be fooled, he said. The line crawls forward about one week a month, he said, “and sometimes it jumps back real fast and by a lot.”

    In the meantime, Garcia said, he has lost college financial aid and job offers because he is undocumented. He said he would have probably returned to Mexico if he had known it would take so long.

    “It’s probably been a month or two since I last ended up crying because sometimes this life does get to you,” he said. “It’s not living, it’s just surviving.”

    Even for those on a seemingly smoother path, such as a foreigner marrying a U.S. citizen, the family route still can take years.

    Married ... with complications
    Jeanette Smith, a former immigration lawyer in Miami who once guided couples through the system, is at the next step in the process as she tries to win citizenship for her husband, Agustin Gonzalez, a Panamanian national: providing documentation and going through interviews with immigration officials.

    Applicants have to provide a dossier that includes the results of a medical exam, an affidavit of support from the relative sponsor saying the applicant has sufficient means of financial support and is unlikely to become a public charge, and any military, court and prison records, plus original documents establishing family ties between the sponsor and the applicant.

    Many applicants must do interviews with U.S. consular or embassy officials in their home country.

    Married in 2009, Smith and Gonzalez, 41, have had two interviews with immigration officials and have submitted documents such as wills, powers of attorney and three years of joint tax returns.

    Slideshow: The youngest new Americans

    John Moore / Getty Images

    After migrating to the U.S. as minors, children take their oath of allegiance to become citizens.

    Launch slideshow

    The couple provided a wedding album, and affidavits from friends and co-workers attesting to their relationship, too.

    But Gonzalez, who first came to the U.S. on a guest worker visa that expired, remains undocumented. Since the couple was married less than two years during their first immigration interview in 2009, he could only get a conditional green card that expired in January while they were awaiting the second interview, said Smith, 47, executive director of South Florida Interfaith Worker Justice.

    It leaves Smith feeling scared that her husband could be deported, although judges can exercise discretion.

    The immigration officer “has the ability to make a decision on whether my marriage is valid or not,” Smith said. “Who else in this world has the ability to do that other than the couple themselves?”

    Though Smith knows she has more experience that helps her navigate the system, she said: “It’s difficult, I don’t think people realize it  …  People think that it’s some automatic process, and all your problems are solved. And it’s not.”

    Some who make it through the process can still in the end be denied a green card for dozens of different reasons, said Muzaffar Chishti, director of the Migration Policy Institute's office at New York University School of Law.

    “This is an amazing story in people’s resilience at some level and it continues to show you how much appeal the U.S. green card still holds, that people are willing to put their lives on hold for prolonged periods of time,” he said.

    Max Whittaker / Prime for NBC News

    Sergio Garcia helps Alma Garcia obtain a legal work permit at his office in Chico, Calif., on April 2.

    Garcia has forged ahead despite the barriers. He graduated college and law school, and is leading a landmark case in California that could set a national precedent on whether undocumented immigrants can receive law licenses. In the meantime, he works as an independent legal aide.

    He ultimately believes the wait will have been worth it.

    “I still think this country is a great country and I think it will give me, in the end, a better future than I could have had in Mexico,” he said. “… I tell people my purpose in life at this point is to prove that the American dream is still alive and well.”

    Follow Miranda Leitsinger on Twitter and Facebook. 

    More in the 'Immigration Nation' series

    Through the obstacle course of immigration, many paths to citizenship

    To get green cards, these immigrants must prove they are extraordinary

    By the numbers: How America tallies its 11.1 million undocumented immigrants

    448 comments

    I watch illegal mexican migrants have 3-5 kids here and get on welfare to pay for what they know they can't afford before hand. It's all a load of cr&p at tax payers expense.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: immigration, immigrants, families, citizenship, green-card, immigration-nation
  • Updated
    15
    May
    2013
    10:40am, EDT

    To get green cards, these immigrants must prove they are extraordinary

    John Makely / NBC News

    Anju Singh, who was born in India and works at the National Institutes of Health, won an extraordinary ability green card for her scientific research.

    By Tracy Connor, Staff Writer, NBC News

    This is the second story in NBC News’ series “Immigration Nation,” an in-depth examination of immigration in America. 

    One is a federal scientist with a Harvard pedigree and a body of ground-breaking research. The other is a burlesque performer with the looks of Rita Hayworth and a ground-shaking shimmy.

    Immigration Nation

    An in–depth look at immigration in America

    Both women have been deemed “aliens of extraordinary ability” by Uncle Sam -- an elite cadre of immigrants who earn green cards, and a path to citizenship, by proving they are tops in their field.

    While the "extraordinary ability" route can be one of the fastest, persuading a faceless bureaucrat they deserve permanent residency can be a frustrating, expensive, even humbling experience for high achievers who may already be household names in their homelands.

    “The process is a nightmare,” said Anju Singh, the researcher with the National Institutes of Health, who was born in India and studied and worked in the U.S. for nearly a decade before she pursued the coveted green card granting permanent U.S. residency.


    The payoff, though, is something many immigrants with less impressive resumes can only dream about.

    “I have never been so excited about a piece of plastic,” said Bettina May, the dancer and pinup model who left Canada to striptease on more fertile American soil. “And it’s actually green!”

    Fewer than 4,000 extraordinary ability EB-1A green cards -- which don’t require a job offer from an American sponsor -- were approved last year. A third of the applications were rejected, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

    Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

    Have an Oscar, Nobel, Pulitzer or Olympic gold medal? Getting the card should be a breeze. But for other A-list artists, athletes, scientists, educators and entrepreneurs, reams of documentation are needed to show they meet at least three of 10 criteria for the program -- from awards and media coverage to high salary and membership in elite groups.

    May was touring the U.S. on a one-year visa when she decided to apply. Over four months, she compiled a 2-inch-thick dossier to demonstrate burlesque was an art form and that she had made a unique contribution.

    The file she submitted in December 2010 had clippings from papers around the country, tape of her appearance on a “Real Housewives” franchise, box-office receipts and hard-won letters of recommendation from producers and venue owners attesting that she is the creme de la Can-Can.

    “It’s hard to ask for favors, especially from people you don’t know too well,” May said.

    Waiting and worrying
    While Miss Universe can land a green card in a matter of weeks, this Golden Pasties winner had to wait more than a year and a half because her lawyer left her birth certificate out of the application and the adjudication officer kept sending requests for more evidence.

    “I was a wreck, thinking at any minute they’re going to tell me you have to leave the country," she said. "It’s so hard to live your life that way. What do I do if I get kicked out? If I go back to Canada, I’ll have to get a desk job.” After $10,000 in legal fees, May got her ego-boosting green card in August.

    Singh had a shorter but similarly stressful wait.

    After attending veterinary school in India, she came to the U.S. in 2003 for graduate studies. She earned a doctorate in immunology in five years and trained at the Harvard School of Public Health.

    Things got complicated when her husband was laid off. As a non-resident, he was ineligible for unemployment benefits and dependent on his wife’s visa, which could have made it harder for her to find employment sponsors.

    She also was pregnant when she decided to apply for a green card early last year. Between bouts of morning sickness, she badgered big-name scientists who had cited her work to give her recommendations and began reviewing research to satisfy an application criterion.

    Among the challenges: translating her biggest achievements -- isolating novel markers to identify stem cells that make bone, which could one day lead to disease cures -- in a way that would impress an adjudicator with no scientific expertise.

    Anju Singh, who was born in India and works at the National Institutes of Health, won an extraordinary ability green card for her scientific research.

    'I'm really extraordinary'
    Soon after giving birth, she received a letter from the government. There was no green card inside; they wanted more evidence, and a guarantee she would continue working in her field, which bridges basic lab research and clinical medicine.

    Three months later came word she was approved.

    "I was so happy, I couldn't sleep," Singh said. "I was thinking, 'I'm really extraordinary.' It was an amazing feeling."

    While statistics show the percentage of applications approved hit a decade high last year, some immigration lawyers think it's actually getting more difficult to make cases, with frequent requests for more evidence that underscore the subjective side of the process.

    Jeff Goldman, who practices in Cambridge, Mass., said he had to get the National Basketball Association commissioner's office involved after the feds expressed skepticism about the worthiness of Cleveland Cavaliers forward Omri Casspi, who stars in cereal commercials in his native Israel, was a first-round draft pick and was named to the NBA's all-rookie team.

    "We have seen over the years it's harder to get these cases approved," said Michael Wildes, a lawyer who helped supermodel Gisele Bundchen and golfer Greg Norman obtain green cards. "We've seen the government go through (applications) with a surgical knife."

    Adjudicators go from screening ballerinas to biologists. While there are guidelines, "in practice, there's a big standard deviation," said Cletus Weber, an attorney from the Seattle area.

    Paul Hawthorne / Getty Images

    Sean Yazbeck won an extraordinary ability green card for his entrepreneurship and parlayed it into a spot on Donald's Trump's "The Apprentice."

    One of his clients, German mobile-technology entrepreneur Cyriac Roeding, won approval in a few months in 2007 and went on to launch the hugely successful startup Shopkick. The wait was far longer for Sean Yazbeck, a British phone-network engineer who got his green card in 2005 and went on to win Donald Trump's "The Apprentice."

    "For me, it was a very long, sweaty four years of waiting and waiting," he said.

    Well-credentialed foreigners who don't think they qualify for EB-1A, or the closely related EB-1B “outstanding professors or researchers” category, can seek green cards in the less-stringent “national interest waiver” category. That has its own set of requirements, and applicants from China or India face a backlog.

    Those who don't meet the standard for a waiver typically must find a full-time permanent position with a U.S. employer that can demonstrate that it could not find a qualified American for the job.

    Most lawyers said if a client is rejected for an extraordinary green card, it doesn't pay to appeal.

    Singer Celine Dion's bodyguard and driver, Nick Skokos, was turned down in 2009 after immigration officials determined he was a little too ordinary. He sued, but the courts ruled against him. He remains in the U.S. on a non-immigrant work visa, with no path to citizenship.

    Related story:
    Through the obstacle course of immigration, many paths to citizenship

    "For Nick, the case was never about whether he had permission to be in the United States or not," said his lawyer, Luther Snavely. "Nick just loves the U.S.  He wanted to become a lawful permanent resident and then a U.S. citizen, and he felt very strongly about it."

    Extraordinary ability green cards must be renewed after 10 years, or the holder can apply for citizenship in about five years.

    Yazbeck did it and is naturalized. Roeding and Singh haven't decided whether to seek citizenship. May, though, is counting the days until she can file.

    After visiting every state except Michigan, she's sure she wants to twirl her tassels here forever.

    "It's a beautiful country, and the people are amazing," she said.

    This story was originally published on Thu Apr 11, 2013 3:50 PM EDT

    309 comments

    May was touring the U.S. on a one-year visa when she decided to apply. Over four months, she compiled a 2-inch-thick dossier to demonstrate burlesque was an art form and that she had made a unique contribution.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: immigration, immigrants, citizenship, exceptional, updated, immigration-nation
  • 11
    Apr
    2013
    12:09pm, EDT

    Anti-immigrant groups go on attack to block 'pathway to citizenship'

    Numbers USA

    Screen shot of Numbers USA ad targeting Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who is among the senators trying to hammer out bipartisan immigration reform legislation.

    By Michael Isikoff and Carl Sears, NBC News

    A closely aligned network of anti-immigrant groups — founded with help from a controversial Michigan doctor who has argued that the country’s “European American majority” must be preserved — has spent over $100 million over the past decade to shape public policies aimed at restricting immigration, according to a NBC News analysis of public records.

    Immigration Nation

    An in–depth look at immigration in America

    The groups — spearheaded by Numbers USA  and its combative president, Roy Beck --  have played a key role in blocking legislation that would open up a “pathway to citizenship” for  undocumented workers, according to lobbyists on both sides of the contentious issue.

    Now, as a bipartisan group of senators crafts a bill it hopes can pass Congress, the anti-immigrant groups are encouraging their backers to bombard Capitol Hill offices with phone calls and faxes opposing such a deal. Numbers USA also has  launched attack ads targeting  Senate  supporters of the measure such as South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican. 

    “Who elected Graham to demand amnesty and welfare for millions of illegal aliens?” states the narrator in a Numbers USA ad now running in South Carolina as part of an estimated $200,000 ad buy.  A constituent responds:  “Amnesty? Not me.”


    “Our goal is to stop this legislation,” said Beck, whose group is planning a series of ads aimed at pressuring senators who might be tempted to back immigration reform. “Every senator that is taking stands that are clearly against the interests of their citizens, their constituents are going to be reminded that there are elections.”

    NBC's Michael Isikoff joins The Daily Rundown's Chuck Todd to report on lobbying efforts for and against immigration reform.

    Graham, a key member of the so-called “Gang of Eight” working on the immigration overhaul bill who is up for re-election next year, is undeterred, according to a statement released by his office.  “If you want to run ads against me, spend all the money you want to spend. I'm not backing off,” Graham said.

    Beck insists his group — with a $7 million budget and 1.3 million members — is growing “ by the day”  because of fears that the immigration measure will “flood this labor market with more foreign workers at the expense of our own Americans.” And he’s unabashed about what he wants to happen to the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in the country:  “What they’ve done is not a victimless crime. They have hurt vulnerable Americans by being here by taking jobs, by taking taxpayer services. And I would say (to them), ‘You need to get your affairs in order and go back home.’”

    The political clout of groups like Numbers USA was most visible during last year’s GOP presidential primary, when Mitt Romney declared his support for “self deportation” of undocumented workers. Beck immediately hailed and claimed credit for Romney’s stance, asserting his group had been backing the same idea for years under a concept it called “attrition through enforcement.”

    Numbers USA and two closely aligned groups -- the Federation for American Immigration Reform, or FAIR, and the Center for Immigration Studies — have spent $103 million to promote the cause of reducing immigration, both legal and illegal,  since 2002, according to a NBC News review of public records and tax returns. The  biggest single contributor – with about $36 million in donations --  was the Colcom Foundation, a Pittsburgh-based  “conservationist” group  that states on its website it was created to explore the “causes and consequences of overpopulation  and its impact on environmental sustainability.” (The foundation was started by the late Cordelia Scaife May, niece of former Secretary of Treasury Andrew Mellon and the sister of Richard Mellon Scaife, a major funder of conservative causes.  )


    Follow @openchannelblog

    After Romney’s defeat, the activities of Numbers USA and the allied anti-immigration groups are getting new scrutiny — and there are signs of a potential backlash.    

    Some Republicans blame the groups for the party’s sinking share of the Latino vote — 27 percent in 2012, down from 40 percent in 2004. 

    'A recipe for disaster'
    The disaffected Republicans have found themselves in unusual political company, including civil rights groups like the Southern Poverty Leadership Conference, as they have escalated their attacks on Beck and his allies, primarily over their common ties to a controversial Michigan doctor and environmentalist who they contend has a history of racial and ethnic prejudice. 

    “I would say that listening to these groups is a recipe for disaster for the GOP,” said Alfonso Aguilar, executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles and a former chief of the U.S. Office of Citizenship during the administration of President George W. Bush.      

    Aguilar is among a number of Republican activists who have recently been meeting with congressional staffers emphasizing links between Numbers USA, FAIR and the Center for Immigration Studies and Dr. John Tanton, who has been described as the “architect” of the anti-immigrant movement. Tanton helped found and support all three groups and, like Cordelia Scaife May, a longtime friend and ally, has often described himself as an environmentalist worried about the dangers of overpopulation. But he has also faced repeated charges from civil rights groups of being motivated by sympathy for “white nationalism,” based on his writings in the 1980s and ‘90s.

    Tanton, in memos and letters he donated to the University of Michigan library, expressed concerns at the time about the threat posed by  immigration to  the environment and the country’s population, sometimes casting the issue in racial and ethnic terms. "For European-American society and culture to persist, requires a European-American majority, and a clear one at that,” he wrote in one 1993 letter. In a 1986 memo, he questioned whether “Latin American migrants bring with them the tradition of the mordida (bribe).” 

    Tanton, now 79 and suffering from health problems, was unavailable for comment, according to a spokesman He has strongly denied any racial prejudice in the past.

    'Ethnic component' denied
    Beck, who formerly worked for Tanton as an editor of his magazine, “The Social Contract,” said: “Numbers USA does not agree there is any kind of racial aspect to immigration. We’ve always been clear: Immigration should not have a racial impact, should not have an ethnic component.”

    In his recent meetings on Capitol Hill, Aguilar says he has emphasized the political impact of the Tanton-backed groups.  Among his key pieces of evidence:  a 2001 letter that Tanton wrote laying out a political strategy, developed with Beck, aimed at distancing the GOP from all “immigrants,” with no distinction made between those who are illegal or legal.

    “The goal is to change the Republicans’ perception of immigration so that when they encounter the word ‘immigrant,’ their reaction is ‘Democrat,’” the Tanton letter states.

    “Our plan,” the letter continues, “is to hire a lobbyist who will carry the following message to Republicans on Capitol Hill and to business leaders:  ‘Continued massive immigration will soon cost you political control of the White House and Congress, given the current even division of the electorate and the massive infusion of voters about to be made to the Democratic side.” 

     “That letter is a smoking gun,” Aguilar said, adding that some Republican staffers are “shocked” when he shows it to them. “We cannot make inroads with Latinos precisely because of that strategy.”

    Beck says Tanton’s letter was simply stating political reality – that “for 150 years, immigrants always vote, 2-to-1, Democratic, because the Democratic Party  is the bigger supporter of government services.”  He added: “The message to the Republicans is to go after the immigrant vote, you might want to consider whether it’s really worth driving down American wages, just so you can get cheap labor for your corporate contributors.”

    Beck said he was referring to corporate interests like the Chamber of Commerce and Microsoft, that have been lobbying hard for an immigration overhaul bill and which, he maintains, are vastly outspending the efforts on his side. “We’re up against every power elite in the country,” he said.

    But he’s got no shortage of confidence: “I’d much rather be in my situation than the situation on the other side.”

    Michael Isikoff is NBC News' National Investigative Correspondent; Carl Sears is a Washington, D.C.-based Producer for NBC News. NBC News researcher Taylor Sears also contributed to this article

    More from Open Channel:

    • Leading NYC heart doctor put patients at risk to steal Medicare millions
    • Development of multiple military camouflage uniforms wastes millions, GAO finds
    • White House to propose restrictions on Master Death File to fight tax fraud

    Follow Open Channel from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook 

     

    614 comments

    Something needs to be done to stop this immigration change. Use the laws we have and deport them. Money well spent.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: immigration, immigration-platform
  • 11
    Apr
    2013
    11:40am, EDT

    NBC's Mark Potter answers questions on border security and immigration

    Immigration Nation

    An in–depth look at immigration in America

    With a bipartisan group of senators expected to unveil immigration-reform legislation in the next few days, there are many issues at stake. Security along the U.S.-Mexico border has been one of the most thorny issues for immigration reform.

    NBC News' Mark Potter has done extensive reporting along the U.S.-Mexico border. He answered reader questions about border security earlier today. 

    Click on the box below to replay the informative chat.

    Related links:

    Through the obstacle course of immigration, many paths to citizenship

    First thoughts: Why immigration reform has a better chance than guns

    16 comments

    This will be another case of putting a band-aid on a bullet wound. Nothing will most likely be solved because the original problem of a poorly managed and corrupt immigration system will not be fixed, it will only have more problems added to it and what about people legally on the wait list? I can a …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: mexico, immigration, border-security, u-s, immigration-nation
  • 11
    Apr
    2013
    12:03am, EDT

    NBC/WSJ poll: Strong majority backs citizenship for undocumented immigrants

    By Mark Murray, Senior Political Editor, NBC News

    With a bipartisan group of senators expected to unveil immigration-reform legislation in the next few days, a brand-new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll finds that nearly two-thirds of Americans – including eight-in-10 Latinos – support giving undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship.

    A slight majority of Republican respondents oppose this path, possibly foreshadowing the resistance which any comprehensive immigration reform bill might receive, especially in the GOP-controlled House of Representatives.

    But when Republicans hear that a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants includes paying fines and back taxes, almost three-quarters of them support the idea.

    What’s more, a majority of the public – for the first time in the poll – agrees with the statement that immigration strengthens the nation, reflecting a shift in attitude on this issue. 

    Republican pollster Bill McInturff, who conducted this survey with the Democratic firm Hart Research Associates, says that this change in sentiment on immigration “speaks to something potent,” particularly given the economic struggles of the past five years.

    "These more positive attitudes provide more leeway for lawmakers to build support for change on this issue," McInturff adds.

    View the poll results here

    On other matters, the poll shows a majority of the public favors stricter gun laws, President Barack Obama’s approval rating falling below 50 percent for the first time since Oct. 2012, and fewer than two-in-10 Americans saying the automatic budget cuts known as “the sequester” have significantly affected them.

    Immigration – a strength or weakness?
    A majority (54 percent) agrees with the statement that immigration adds to the nation’s character and strengthens it by bringing diversity and talent to the country.

    Saul Loeb / AFP - Getty Images

    Tens of thousands of immigration reform supporters march in the "Rally for Citizenship" on the West Lawn of the US Capitol in Washington, DC, on April 10, 2013.

    In a 2010 NBC/WSJ survey, fewer than half of respondents agreed with that statement, and in 2005, a plurality said that immigration weakened the nation.

    Additionally, the Democratic Party holds a 7-point advantage over the Republican Party on the question of which party does a better job in dealing with immigration.

    Among an oversample of Latino respondents, the Democratic edge increases to 26 points.

    Regarding the current legislative debate over immigration, 64 percent of respondents say they favor allowing undocumented immigrants to have the opportunity to become legal American citizens.

    That includes 82 percent of Latinos, 80 percent of Democrats and 54 percent of political independents supporting a path to citizenship.

    But 51 percent of Republicans oppose it, versus 47 percent who back it.

    Yet when told that the pathway to citizenship would require paying fines and back taxes, as well as passing a security-background check, support grows – with 76 percent of total respondents, and 73 percent of Republicans backing the path.

    Sen. Bob Menendez, D-N.J., a member of the Gang of Eight immigration reform group, joins The Daily Rundown to talk about immigration reform talks, the budget battle taking place on The Hill, North Korea and touches on the investigation regarding Dr. Salomon Melgen.

    That pathway to citizenship is the heart of a comprehensive immigration reform proposal that the so-called “Gang of Eight” senators – including Democrats Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin and Republicans John McCain and Marco Rubio – are drafting and plan to introduce in the next few days.

    The proposal also calls for strengthening the U.S.-Mexico border, tying that security to establishing the path to citizenship and expanding legal immigration.

    A majority of all respondents (51 percent) believe undocumented immigrants should be eligible for citizenship five years after application. Just 12 percent say the eligibility should occur after 10 years, and only 18 percent believe citizenship should be immediate.

    On border security, nearly two-thirds of Americans (63 percent) think the U.S.-Mexico border is “mostly” or “totally” not secure, compared with a smaller percentage of Latino respondents (49 percent) who believe that.

    55 percent favor stricter gun laws
    In addition to immigration, Congress is grappling with the issue of gun control, with the Senate expected to vote on Thursday whether to begin debate on a Democratic-backed measure requiring background checks for most gun sales.

    NBC's Luke Russert breaks down the key components of the bipartisan gun control bill.

    According to the poll, 55 percent favor stricter laws covering the sale of firearms.

    That’s down 6 points from the Feb. 2013 NBC/WSJ poll – conducted after Obama’s State of the Union address that contained a call to action on gun control – but it’s essentially unchanged from the Jan. 2013 poll.

    Yet there’s a wide political divide to these numbers: 82 percent of Democrats favor stricter gun laws, while just 27 percent of Republicans do.

    Obama’s approval rating drops to 47 percent
    Despite majorities backing the broad outlines of his legislative priorities on immigration and guns, President Obama confronts a pessimistic public and declining poll numbers.

    Only 31 percent of Americans believe the country is headed in the right direction – a decline of 10 points since Dec. 2012.

    His overall job-approval rating stands at 47 percent, which is down 3 points since February and which represents the first time he’s been below 50 percent since just before the 2012 election.

    In addition, 47 percent approve of the president’s economic handling (up three points from February), and 46 percent approve of his handling of foreign policy (down six from Dec. 2012).

    Democratic pollster Fred Yang of Hart Research says that the public’s sour attitude, particularly on the economy, has “dragged down” Obama’s numbers.

    Sequester’s limited impact (so far)
    Lastly, the NBC/WSJ poll finds that only a combined 16 percent of Americans say the automatic across-the-board budget cuts that went into effect earlier in the year have impacted them either “a great deal” or “quite a bit.”

    By comparison, a whopping 75 percent say the cuts to military and non-military programs have affected them “just some” or “not much.”

    But a plurality of respondents – 47 percent – believe the cuts will mostly harm the economy, versus 30 percent who say they won’t have an impact.

    The NBC/WSJ poll was conducted of 1,000 adults (including 300 cell phone-only respondents) from April 5-8, and it has an overall margin of error of plus-minus 3.1 percentage points.

    930 comments

    This statistic news is totally a FARCE!!! The truth is that 'the majority of Americans' want 'all illegals' returned to their countries.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: congress, senate, immigration, white-house, house, capitol-hill, featured, sequestration, daily-rundown, immigration-nation, appfeatured
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • crime,
  • weather,
  • military,
  • updated,
  • california,
  • florida,
  • environment,
  • shooting,
  • us-news,
  • new-york,
  • texas,
  • education,
  • chicago,
  • police,
  • gulf-oil-spill,
  • los-angeles,
  • kari-huus,
  • murder,
  • nbcnewyork,
  • guns,
  • new-jersey,
  • afghanistan,
  • obama,
  • colorado,
  • trayvon-martin,
  • sandy,
  • nbclosangeles,
  • barack-obama,
  • crime-and-courts,
  • politics,
  • gay,
  • fire,
  • arizona,
  • veterans,
  • george-zimmerman,
  • connecticut,
  • crime-courts
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Bill Briggs, NBC News contributor

NBC News contributor covering health, business, military and travel. @writerdude Author of "The Third Miracle: An Ordinary Man, A Medical Mystery and a Trial of Faith" (Random House, 2011).

Bill Briggs, NBC News contributor Blogroll

  • Bill Briggs on Twitter
  • Bill Briggs on Facebook

Miranda Leitsinger

Archives

  • 2013
    • June (258)
    • May (461)
    • April (608)
    • March (548)
    • February (510)
    • January (563)
  • 2012
    • December (457)
    • November (460)
    • October (477)
    • September (432)
    • August (525)
    • July (519)
    • June (508)
    • May (566)
    • April (538)
    • March (576)
    • February (471)
    • January (417)
  • 2011
    • December (455)
    • November (190)
    • October (9)
    • September (3)
    • August (51)
    • July (8)
    • June (3)
    • May (12)
    • April (5)
    • March (3)
    • February (1)
    • January (8)
  • 2010
    • December (5)
    • November (1)
    • October (2)
    • September (28)
    • August (40)
    • July (35)
    • June (177)
    • May (50)
    • April (9)
    • March (2)
    • February (2)
    • January (4)
  • 2009
    • December (5)
    • November (5)
    • October (2)
    • September (11)
    • August (4)
    • July (12)
    • June (1)
    • May (1)
    • April (1)
    • March (3)
    • February (3)
    • January (2)
  • 2008
    • December (3)
    • November (2)
    • October (6)
    • September (30)
    • August (26)
    • July (10)
    • June (4)
    • May (8)
    • April (13)
    • March (9)
    • February (7)
    • January (6)
  • 2007
    • December (10)
    • November (6)
    • October (22)
    • September (11)

Most Commented

  • Supreme Court strikes down Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship to vote (3930)
  • Census: White majority in U.S. gone by 2043 (1937)
  • Indiana woman on death row since she was 16 to be released (1271)
  • After Scouts lift gay youth ban, Baptist group calls for firings (2341)
  • Six months later, Newtown families grieve, push for stricter gun-control legislation (1283)
  • Mom, three teen daughters shot in Nashville; gunman still at large (1119)
  • NSA leaker hunkers down in Hong Kong -- for now (1412)

Other blogs

  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • US news on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise