• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Rebirth after the big storm: How one small town dug out, spruced up and lived on
  • Recommended: 'Like a Hollywood movie': Driver survives I-5 bridge collapse into Wash. river
  • Recommended: 'Winter' - maybe even snow - to return for Memorial Day weekend
  • Recommended: Cars, drivers plunge into river after Wash. I-5 bridge collapse

NBC News reporters bring you compelling stories from across the nation. For more US news, follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 16
    Jul
    2012
    4:51pm, EDT

    Three men say they were abused by Jerry Sandusky in '70s or '80s

    Pat Little / Reuters file

    Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky leaves the Centre County Courthouse in handcuffs after his conviction in a child sex abuse trial in Bellefonte, Penn. on June 22, 2012.

    By NBC News staff

    Three men have told police they were abused by Jerry Sandusky in the 1970s or 1980s, according to a local report Monday.

    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    Sources close the Sandusky case say they are the first people to allege abuse before the 1990s by the 68-year-old convicted pedophile, The Patriot-News reported. 

    In the early 1970s when one of the men said he was abused, the former Penn State assistant football coach would have been in his late 20s.

    Sandusky was convicted in June on 45 counts of child sex abuse against 10 victims. As the case unfolded, more alleged victims came forward – including Sandusky’s adopted son – to say they were also abused.

    The grand jury investigation is still meeting and could potentially hear from more alleged victims. When Sandusky is sentenced in September, he could face hundreds of years behind bars for the crimes for which he was convicted.

    There is no mention of victims before the 1990s in the Freeh report, an independent account detailing the results of an eight-month internal investigation of the actions of Penn State employees.  The report, authored by Judge Louis Freeh and his law firm, was made public Thursday. 

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Video: Bus driver catches girl, 7, in three-story plunge
    • 17 hurt, four critical, in Alabama bar shooting
    • Crews drag lake in search for missing young Iowa cousins
    • Battle brews over Trayvon Martin memorial
    • Paterno family says it will conduct own probe

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    235 comments

    Is anyone surprised? You don't wake up one day at say the age of 50, and suddenly become a pedophile. There are many more victims. I think it is to late for them to take any legal action. It would help fight this behavior if more victims could come forward. Single mothers in particular...beware of m …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, child-sex-abuse, sandusky, jerry-sandusky
  • 14
    Jul
    2012
    8:57am, EDT

    Penn State to renovate showers, locker room where Sandusky abused boys

    By NBC News and msnbc.com news services

    STATE COLLEGE, Pa. -- Penn State plans to renovate the building where Jerry Sandusky sexually molested boys, a university spokesman said Friday.

    David La Torre said that Penn State plans to remodel the football shower and locker room area as a direct result of Sandusky's crimes.


    The former defensive coordinator was convicted last month of 45 counts of sexual molestation involving 10 boys. Some of the assaults took place in the football showers.

    Read the full story on NBC station WGAL here

    La Torre said renovation plans to the Lasch Football Building were drawn up shortly after Sandusky's arrest in November. But he said Penn State can't move forward until all legal proceedings in the case are over.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    Penn State President Rodney Erickson said there have been discussions about Lasch building renovations between Athletic Director David Joyner and new Penn State football coach Bill O'Brien.

    Expert: Freeh report ups legal risk for former Penn State president

    The Lasch building was the scene of a 2001 incident in which graduate assistant coach Mike McQueary said he saw Sandusky abuse a boy in the shower.

    An internal investigation released on Thursday said that Penn State leaders including late football coach Joe Paterno covered up Sandusky's sexual abuse for years to protect the high-profile football program. 

    NBC News station WGAL and Reuters contributed to this report.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Colorado: Dentist reused needles; thousands at HIV risk
    • Expert: Penn State report ups legal risk for former president
    • 5-mile-long landslide in Alaska national park; warming eyed as culprit
    • Same-sex couple fights to stop deportation
    • Family fulfills dying man's wish: $500 tip for waitress
    • Missing New York woman found alive after 'girl with this phone is dead' text
    • Man becomes cop to honor murdered brother
    • Video: Twitter account used to bully students shut down

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook


    376 comments

    wow, penn state's priorities could not be more backwards. when are they going to give back to the victims they ignored for so many years?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: child, penn-state, scandal, boys, featured, sexual-abuse, crime-and-courts, jerry-sandusky
  • 12
    Jul
    2012
    12:21pm, EDT

    Analysis: Paterno could have been indicted if he had lived

    NBC's Bob Costas says Joe Paterno's reputation can never fully recover from the Penn State sexual abuse scandal, and now the NCAA plans to step up their investigation.

    By Wesley Oliver, NBC News Legal Analyst

    The Freeh Report is a scathing indictment, to speak colloquially, of officials at Penn State. But it could also preview actual indictments against Graham Spanier, Tim Curley, and Gary Schultz, key Penn State officials at the time Jerry Sandusky's sex abuse of minors was first being reported. And if Joe Paterno was still alive, his name could easily be added to that list.


    Follow Open Channel on Twitter and Facebook.


    The report describes many of the facts those following the case already knew, but the facts were described in a way that very clearly maps onto the elements of crimes.

    The report finds that senior officials at Penn State had no concern about the welfare of at least one victim of Sandusky's crimes and allowed Sandusky continued access to the campus, where he was able to continue to perpetrate his crimes.


    Paterno, Curley, Schultz, and Spanier were aware of an investigation about improper conduct with Sandusky in a shower with a young boy in 1998. Then, when they learned from Michael McQueary that another incident occurred -- and this time much more graphic details were provided -- they only asked Sandusky not to bring his "guests" into Penn State showers.

    Report: Penn State president, Paterno concealed facts about sex abuse

    Most substantially, the report observes, not only did Penn State officials not attempt to learn this young man's name to see if he had been harmed, they actually placed him in danger by informing Sandusky that McQueary had seen them in the shower together. In effect, university officials tipped off Sandusky to a potential child witness against him. Sandusky could have threatened the boy -- or worse -- to ensure his silence. Or Sandusky could have merely taken out his rage at being discovered on this young man he saw as the reason for the discovery.

    By not reporting Sandusky's activities and allowing him on the campus after these incidents, university officials essentially assisted Sandusky in his crimes. As the report poignantly states, university officials gave him access to the university and the trappings of a top college football program. The officials thus "provided Sandusky with the very currency that enabled him to attract his victims."

    As prosecutors decide their next move, the Freeh Report offers a description of facts tailor-made for an indictment for endangering the welfare of a minor. It provides perhaps even more.

    Typically, to conspire to commit a crime or to aid and abet a crime, you have to desire that the crime occur. No one argues that Penn State officials wanted Sandusky to rape boys. Courts, however, are beginning to recognize that for very serious crimes, if you take an action that you know assists the completion of that crime, you may well be legally responsible as a conspirator, aider or abettor. 

    If prosecutors elect to use the trend in modern conspiracy and complicity law to bring indictments in this case, the perjury and failure to report charges against Curley and Schultz will seem like minor offenses in hindsight.  And the Freeh Report gives prosecutors the ammunition to do just that.  

    The author of this piece is an NBC News legal analyst and professor at Duquesne Law School.

    The full investigative report by Louis Freeh is available in this PDF file.

    Related stories

    Matt Sandusky: From staunch defender to father's most damning accuser

    Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt empty house where his charity was born

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Report: Paterno, others hid Sandusky sexual abuse
    • Prosecutor releases another round of Zimmerman evidence
    • Caught on camera: Shark steals fish off pole
    • Guantanamo detainee who served bin Laden returns to Sudan

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    465 comments

    Wow! That is his "great legacy": The protector of a pedophile

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, joe-paterno, featured, sexual-assault, jerry-sandusky, commentid-featured
  • 12
    Jul
    2012
    7:30am, EDT

    Report finds Penn State president, Paterno concealed facts about Sandusky sex abuse

    Penn State released the findings of an internal investigation by former FBI Director Louie Freeh, which revealed how much top University officials knew about Jerry Sandusky's behavior and the failure of them to do anything about it. NBC's Michael Isikoff reports.

    By Bill Dedman, Investigative Reporter, NBC News

    Penn State football coach Joe Paterno and other university leaders "repeatedly concealed critical facts" relating to assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky’s child sex abuse from authorities, according to Louis Freeh, the former FBI director who conducted an investigation for the university in the Sandusky scandal.

    Freeh also found that "although concern to treat the child abuser humanely was expressly stated, no such sentiments were ever expressed" by university officials, including Paterno and the university president, for Sandusky’s victims. The report says that five boys were assaulted by Sandusky on university property after officials knew about a 1998 criminal investigation.

    Update: Members of the Penn State board of trustees spoke at an afternoon news conference.


    "Our hearts remain heavy, and we are deeply ashamed," said trustee Kenneth C. Frazier, chairman, CEO and president of Merck & Co., the pharmaceutical company. "An event like this can never happen again in the Penn State University community. Judge Freeh's report is both sad and sobering."

    The president of the university, Rodney A. Erickson, said, "It has become clear to me that I need to reconsider our community's leadership culture." He said the university is partnering with the Pennsylvania Coalition against Rape, and creating a center for the protection of children. "This is a problem that plagues our nation," Erickson said, "and we have a special duty" to prevent and treat child sexual abuse.

    A statue of Paterno remains outside Penn State's 106,000-seat Beaver Stadium. Members of the board of trustees were asked whether it should remain.

    "The whole topic of Joe Paterno being honored or not being honored is a very sensitive topic," said Karen B. Peetz, a banker and chairman of the board. "We believe this is something that will continue to be discussed."

    Trustee Frazier added, "You have to measure every human by the good they've done and the bad they've done. I'm not trying to make light of what we've found in the report, but I will say that if you want to measure the man's life," you have to measure the good and bad. "I think we have to take some reflection and some distance before we make decisions about what we think about Joe Paterno's entire life." 

    The Freeh report says the main cause of the university's failure was a desire to avoid bad publicity. Also contributing:

    • A striking lack of empathy for child abuse victims.
    • Lack of oversight by the board of trustees.
    • "A president who discouraged discussion and dissent."
    • Ignorance of child abuse issues and laws.
    • A football program that had opted out of university programs and training on reporting requirements.
    • "A culture of reverence for the football program that is ingrained at all levels of the campus community."

    The full investigative report is available in this PDF file.

    Freeh's findings may affect the reputation of legendary coach Paterno, who died soon after the Sandusky allegations became public, as well as the university's standing with the National Collegiate Athletic Association, which so far has not announced any punishments of Penn State. The NCAA said Thursday it is studying the report.

    Paterno had testified to a grand jury in 2011 that he knew nothing of the 1998 criminal investigation, but Freeh, based on multiple university emails, said Paterno was among the officials who knew, and who allowed Sandusky to keep his university access until 2011.


    Follow Open Channel on Twitter and Facebook.


    Summary of the report
    Freeh was hired by the university in November to review the school's dealings with Sandusky and its response to a 2001 report that he sexually abused a boy in a Penn State shower room, an incident witnessed by football assistant Michael McQueary. (McQueary's term was allowed to expire this year, and he is no longer employed by the university.)

    Freeh's team of investigators found:

    "The most saddening finding by the Special Investigative Counsel is the total and consistent disregard by the most senior leaders at Penn State for the safety and welfare of Sandusky's child victims. As the Grand Jury similarly noted in its presentment, there was no "attempt to investigate, to identify Victim 2, or to protect that child or any others from similar conduct except as related to preventing its re-occurrence on University property.

    "Four of the most powerful people at The Pennsylvania State University -- President Graham B. Spanier, Senior Vice President-Finance and Business Gary C. Schultz, Athletic Director Timothy M. Curley and Head Football Coach Joseph V. Paterno -- failed to protect against a child predator harming children for over a decade. These men concealed Sandusky's activities from the Board of Trustees, the University community and authorities. They exhibited a striking lack of empathy for Sandusky's victims by failing to inquire as to their safety and well-being, especially by not attempting to determine the identity of the child who Sandusky assaulted in the Lasch Building in 2001. Further, they exposed this child to additional harm by alerting Sandusky, who was the only one who knew the child's identity, of what McQueary saw in the shower on the night of February 9, 2001.

    "These individuals, unchecked by the Board of Trustees that did not perform its oversight duties, empowered Sandusky to attract potential victims to the campus and football events by allowing him to have continued, unrestricted and unsupervised access to the University's facilities and affiliation with the University's prominent football program. Indeed, that continued access provided Sandusky with the very currency that enabled him to attract his victims. Some coaches, administrators and football program staff members ignored the red flags of Sandusky's behaviors and no one warned the  public about him."

    Jay Paterno, the son of legendary Penn State coach Joe Paterno, says that his family is awaiting the release of former FBI director Louis Freeh's "thorough report" into the sex scandal and possible cover-up at the university.

    Mark Parker, the CEO of Nike, the athletic equipment company, said Thursday it would remove Paterno's name from a child care center. Parker had given a eulogy at Paterno's funeral, defending the coach's response to the allegations. "I have been deeply saddened by the news coming out of this investigation at Penn State," Parker said. "It is a terrible tragedy that children were unprotected from such abhorrent crimes. With the findings released today, I have decided to change the name of our child care center at our World Headquarters. My thoughts are with the victims and the Penn State community."

    Paterno family responds
    The Paterno family released a statement saying there wasn't much new in the Freeh report: "From what we have been able to assess at this time, it appears that after reviewing 3 million documents and conducting more than 400 interviews, the underlying facts as summarized in the report are almost entirely consistent with what we understood them to be. The 1998 incident was reported to law enforcement and investigated. Joe Paterno reported what he was told about the 2001 incident to Penn State authorities and he believed it would be fully investigated. The investigation also confirmed that Sandusky's retirement in 1999 was unrelated to these events."

    "One great risk in this situation," the Paterno family statement continued, "is a replaying of events from the last 15 years or so in a way that makes it look obvious what everyone must have know and should have done.  The idea that any sane, responsible adult would knowingly cover up for a child predator is impossible to accept. The far more realistic conclusion is that many people didn't fully understand what was happening and underestimated or misinterpreted events. Sandusky was a great deceiver. He fooled everyone - law enforcement, his family, coaches, players, neighbors, University officials, and everyone at Second Mile," his charity for children.

    "Joe Paterno wasn't perfect. He made mistakes and he regretted them. He is still the only leader to step forward and say that with the benefit of hindsight he wished he had done more.  To think, however, that he would have protected Jerry Sandusky to avoid bad publicity is simply not realistic. If Joe Paterno had understood what Sandusky was, a fear of bad publicity would not have factored into his actions.

    "We appreciate the effort that was put into this investigation. The issue we have with some of the conclusions is that they represent a judgment on  motives and intentions and we think this is impossible. We have said from the beginning that Joe Paterno did not know Jerry Sandusky was a child predator. Moreover, Joe Paterno never interfered with any investigation. He immediately and accurately reported the incident he was told about in 2001.

    "It can be argued that Joe Paterno should have gone further. He should have pushed his superiors to see that they were doing their jobs.  We accept this criticism. At the same time, Joe Paterno and everyone else knew that Sandusky had been repeatedly investigated by authorities who approved his multiple adoptions and foster children. Joe Paterno mistakenly believed that investigators, law enforcement officials, University leaders and others would properly and fully investigate any issue and proceed as the facts dictated. This didn't happen and everyone shares the responsibility."

    On NBC's TODAY show on Thursday morning, the coach's son, Jay Paterno, told host Matt Lauer that all the family has wanted is for an investigation to find the truth. "We have never ever at any time been afraid to see what people have had to say," and he called the Freeh report "one opinion, one piece of the puzzle." "We've never been afraid of the truth, so let's have the truth come out and let's go from there."

    Former college president responds
    Former Penn State President Graham Spanier has come under particular scrutiny in recent weeks amid news reports suggesting he was made aware of suspicious activity involving Sandusky in 2001 and that no report of the incident was made to authorities.

    "At no time in the more than 16 years of his presidency at Penn State was Dr. Spanier told of an incident involving Jerry Sandusky that described child abuse, sexual misconduct or criminality of any kind, and he reiterated that during his interview with Louis Freeh and his colleagues,'' Spanier's attorneys, Peter Vaira and Elizabeth Ainslie, said in a written statement.

    An "independent" investigation

    The investigation is billed by Pennsylvania State University as "independent," though the university is paying the law firm of Freeh, the former federal judge and director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

    Sandusky, 68, was found guilty of 45 counts of child sexual abuse last month and is currently in prison awaiting sentencing. He faces a maximum sentence of more than 400 years in prison.

    Jim Prisching / AP file

    How will Penn State's "independent report" affect the reputation of its much-beloved former football coach, Joe Paterno, who died after the scandal broke?

     

    Gary Cameron / Reuters file

    Former FBI Director Louis Freeh was hired in November to determine whether Penn State University officials knew about child sex abuse allegations against former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky.

    Related stories

    Matt Sandusky: From staunch defender to father's most damning accuser

    Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt empty house where his charity was born

    The Sandusky scandal led to the ouster of Spanier from the university presidency and Paterno, and charges against Timothy Curley, the athletic director who is on leave from the university, and Gary Schultz, the VP of finance and business who has since retired. The latter two are accused of perjury for their grand jury testimony and failing to properly report suspected child abuse.

    Spanier hasn't been charged. He remains a tenured professor of sociology at Penn State. He has sued the university to gain access to internal emails that his attorneys say will exonerate him.

    On Wednesday, the Paterno family released a letter written six months earlier by Paterno, saying, "This is not a football scandal."

    More from the report:

    "In critical written correspondence that we uncovered on March 20th of this year, we see evidence of their proposed plan of action in February 2001 that included reporting allegations about Sandusky to the authorities. After Mr. Curley consulted with Mr. Paterno, however, they changed the plan and decided not to make a report to the authorities. Their failure to protect the February 9, 2001 child victim, or make attempts to identify him, created a dangerous situation for other unknown, unsuspecting young boys who were lured to the Penn State campus and football games by Sandusky and victimized repeatedly by him.

    "The stated reasons by Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley for not
    taking action to identify the victim and for not reporting Sandusky to the police or Child Welfare are:

    "(1) Through counsel, Messrs. Curley and Schultz have stated that the “humane” thing to do in 2001 was to carefully and responsibly assess the best way to handle vague but troubling allegations.

    "(2) Mr. Paterno said that “I didn’t know exactly how to handle it and I was afraid to do something that might jeopardize what the university procedure was. So I backed away and turned it over to some other people, people I thought would have a little more expertise than I did. It didn’t work out that way.”

    "(3) Mr. Spanier told the Special Investigative Counsel that he was never told by anyone that the February 2001 incident in the shower involved the sexual abuse of a child but only “horsing around.” He further stated that he never asked what “horsing around” by Sandusky entailed.

    "Taking into account the available witness statements and evidence, it is more reasonable to conclude that, in order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity, the most powerful leaders at Penn State University – Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley – repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky’s child abuse from the authorities, the Board of Trustees, Penn State community, and the public at large. 

    "Although concern to treat the child abuser humanely was expressly stated, no such sentiments were ever expressed by them for Sandusky’s victims.

    "The evidence shows that these four men also knew about a 1998 criminal investigation of Sandusky relating to suspected sexual misconduct with a young boy in a Penn State football locker room shower. Again, they showed no concern about that victim. The evidence shows that Mr. Paterno was made aware of the 1998 investigation of Sandusky, followed it closely, but failed to take any action, even though Sandusky had been a key member of his coaching staff for almost 30 years, and had an office just steps away from Mr. Paterno’s. At the very least, Mr. Paterno could have alerted the entire football staff, in order to prevent Sandusky from bringing another child into the Lasch Building. Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley also failed to alert the Board of Trustees about the 1998 investigation or take any further action against Mr. Sandusky. None of them even spoke to Sandusky about his conduct. In short, nothing was done and Sandusky was allowed to continue with impunity."

    Land deal for Second Mile charity
    According to the report, Schultz met with Second Mile officials on July 24, 2001, or six months after McQueary reported seeing Sandusky abusing a boy in a Penn State locker room, and agreed to sell 40 acres of land to the organization. The land, purchased by the university in 1999, was adjacent to the home where Sandusky started the Second Mile. It would be used to build the Second Mile's $11.5 million dollar "Center For Excellence."

    In September 2001, the university's Board of Trustees approved the sale to Sandusky's charity for $168,500. 

    The report states that neither Spanier, Curley nor Schultz informed the Board of Trustees of the 1998 or 2001 investigations of Sandusky: 

    "Nothing in the board's records or interviews of Trustees indicate any contemporaneous discussions of the 2001 Sandusky incident and investigation, the propriety of a continuing relationship between Penn State and the Second Mile, or the risks created by a public association with Sandusky when the land transaction was discussed," the Freeh report says.

    "Schultz, who oversaw the transaction, did not make any disclosure of the Sandusky incident during the Board's review of the land deal. In fact, Schultz approved a press release, issued September 21, 2001, announcing the land sale in which he praised Sandusky for his work with Second Mile."

    Eight years later, according to the report, Schultz contacted a bank on behalf of Sandusky and the Second Mile, in an effort to secure financing for the Center for Excellence. In 2009 he told officials from an unnamed bank that "the Second Mile is raising funds to support an expansion of their facilities here in State College…Would you be agreeable to meet with Jerry Sandusky…and me? They are really good people and this is a great cause related to kids."

    The bank officials agreed to meet with Sandusky.

    More on this land deal is in our earlier story, Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt empty home where his charity was born.

    NBC national investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff, producer Tom Winter, and investigative researchers Lisa Riordan-Seville and Hannah Rappleye contributed to this report.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Guantanamo detainee who served bin Laden returns to Sudan
    • Citizen sues US after being wrongly flagged as deportable immigrant
    • No charges for mother who abandoned severely disabled daughter at bar
    • Drop the 'i' word? Debating the term 'illegal immigrant'
    • Video: Teacher goes airborne on police pursuit

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    1204 comments

    PSU alumni and students - we need another voice on this issue, other than those who are determined to deny any accountability or responsibility for the failure to act, the failure to notify the police, and the failure to notify the child welfare organization in Pennsylvania regarding Mr. Sandusky's  …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, joe-paterno, featured, sexual-assault, louis-freeh, jerry-sandusky, commentid-featured
  • 11
    Jul
    2012
    5:21pm, EDT

    Paterno family releases coach's letter about scandal

    Jim Prisching / AP file

    Joe Paterno supposedly wrote the op-ed column in the weeks before he died of lung cancer.

    By Karen Araiza, NBCPhiladelphia.com

    Joe Paterno's family sent a letter to former Penn State football players today -- an op-ed column they say the coach, himself, wrote in the month or so before he died.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    This is the column, verbatim:

    For the last two months, at the request of the Attorney General's office, I have not discussed the specifics of my testimony regarding the pending cases. And while I will continue to honor that request, I do feel compelled to address comments made subsequent to November 9; specifically, I feel compelled to say, in no uncertain terms, that this is not a football scandal.


    Let me say that again so I am not misunderstood: regardless of anyone's opinion of my actions or the actions of the handful of administration officials in this matter, the fact is nothing alleged is an indictment of football or evidence that the spectacular collections of accomplishments by dedicated student athletes should be in anyway tarnished.

     How to Get Freeh Report

    Yet, over and over again, I have heard Penn State officials decrying the influence of football and have heard such ignorant comments like Penn State will no longer be a “football factory” and we are going to “start” focusing on integrity in athletics. These statements are simply unsupported by the five decades of evidence to the contrary - and succeed only in unfairly besmirching both a great University and the players and alumni of the football program who have given of themselves to help make it great.

    Paterno Family Statement

    For over 40 years young men have come to Penn State with the idea that they were going to do something different — they were coming to a place where they would be expected to compete at the highest levels of college football and challenged to get a degree. And they succeeded — during the last 45 years NO ONE has won more games while graduating more players. The men who made that commitment and who gave of themselves to help build the national reputation of what was once a regional school deserve better than to have their hard work and sacrifice dismissed as part of a “football factory,” all in the interests of expediency.

    Read the original report at Phildelphia's NBC10.com

    Penn State is not a football factory and it is ALREADY a great University. We have world-class researchers, degree programs, and students in every discipline. Penn Staters have been pioneers in medical advancements, engineering, and in the humanities. Our graduates have gone on to change the world — even graduates with football lettermen sweaters.

    That is why recent comments are so perplexing and damaging — Penn Staters know we are a world class University. We can recite with pride the ranks of our academic programs and the successes of our graduates. Penn Staters (and employers) know what we are and the quality of our education. Nothing that has been alleged in any way implicates that reputation; rather, it is only the inexplicable comments of our own administration doing so.

    It must stop. This is not a football scandal and should not be treated as one. It is not an academic scandal and does not in any way tarnish the hard earned and well-deserved academic reputation of Penn State. That Penn State officials would suggest otherwise is a disservice to every one of the over 500,000 living alumni.

    Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

    Forget my career in terms of my accomplishments and look at the last 40 years as I do: as the aggregate achievements of hundreds of young men working to become better people as they got an education and became better football players. Look at those men and what they have done in the world since they left Penn State and assess their contributions as an aggregate - is this a collection of jocks who did nothing but skate by at a football factory, or are these men who earned an education and built a reputation second to none as a place where academic integrity and gridiron success could thrive together?

    Whatever failings that may have happened at Penn State, whatever conclusions about my or others' conduct you may wish to draw from a fair view of the allegations, it is inarguable that these actions had nothing to do with this last team or any of the hundreds of prior graduates of the "Grand Experiment."

    Penn Staters across the globe should feel no shame in saying "We are…Penn State." This is a great University with one of the best academic performing football programs in major college athletics. Those are facts — and nothing that has been alleged changes them.

    Penn State Scandal

    This is the second preemptive strike from the Paterno family before the Freeh report is released on Thursday. The report is expected to explore whether Paterno and other PSU officials helped cover up reports that Jerry Sandusky was molesting children. Just yesterday, the Paterno family sent out a long statement, defending Paterno and reminding the public that he never really got to tell his side of the story. You can click here to that family statement in its entirety.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Guantanamo detainee who served bin Laden returns to Sudan
    • No charges for mother who abandoned severely disabled daughter at bar
    • Sister gets text: 'The girl with this phone is dead'
    • Drop the 'i' word? Debating the term 'illegal immigrant'
    • San Bernardino becomes 3rd Calif. city in 2 weeks to file for bankruptcy protection
    • Video: Teacher goes airborne on police pursuit

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    176 comments

    It is a football scandal since neither Paterno nor the administration wanted to risk the program by coming forward and outing the child predator.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, joe-paterno, jerry-sandusky
  • 28
    Jun
    2012
    8:04pm, EDT

    Sandusky could keep $59,000 pension despite conviction

    By Vignesh Ramachandran

    Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky, convicted of 45 counts of child sexual abuse, could still profit from his public pension.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    Sandusky stands to collect $58,898 each year, according to PennLive.com, because the crimes he committed are not included on the list of 22 that would force him to give up his benefits.

    Pennsylvania's public officials or retirees are required to forfeit their pensions under the State Employees' Retirement System (SERS) if they commit "certain crimes that breach the member's duty of faithful and honest public service." The list does not include sex crimes.


    "I think it is nauseating that a convicted pedophile like Sandusky will be collecting a pension while sitting behind bars," Pennsylvania Rep. Brendan Boyle said in a statement. "He certainly doesn't deserve to continue to enjoy the benefit of a taxpayer-funded pension."

    Upon his death, Sandusky's wife, Dottie, would be able to get half of the annual payout, PennLive.com reported.

    Nicholas Maiale, chairman of the SERS board, told PennLive.com that he will get a legal review of the board's options in this case. "I am a Penn Stater and I am a citizen of Pennsylvania, and we are all morally outraged about this case and what happened to those kids,” he said, though he is not optimistic about a forfeiture.

    Retired Penn State Vice President Gary Schultz, meanwhile, could lose his pension after being accused of perjury, PennLive.com reported.

    Rep. Boyle introduced a bill in 2011, before Sandusky was charged, that is now one of six bills that could broaden the list of crimes that require public workers to give up their pensions, PennLive.com reported.

    Sandusky’s sentencing is expected in about three months.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Supreme Court upholds health care mandate | Stolen Valor Act struck down
    • Miss.'s only abortion clinic sues over new law that could shut it down
    • Brother of lesbian teen shot in head: She's 'fighting'
    • Lying about military service? These bloggers have you in their sights
    • Army veteran campaigns to adopt Diego the bomb-sniffing dog
    • Video: Teacher who slammed student in blog is fired

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    267 comments

    Those loopholes in the law ..... they are the law. A better question than "why does Sandusky get to profit?" might be "Why didn't the State Employees' Retirement System include sex crimes in their list?"

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, pension, featured, jerry-sandusky
  • 26
    Jun
    2012
    10:45am, EDT

    NBC exclusive: Matt Sandusky details alleged sex abuse by his father

    NBC News has exclusively obtained a tape, recorded by police detectives the week before Jerry Sandusky's conviction, in which his own adopted son, Matt, talks about being sexually abused by the former Penn. State coach. NBC's Michael Isikoff reports.

    By Michael Isikoff, NBC News

    Jerry Sandusky’s adopted son Matt told police he was sexually molested by his father for years — and once fled in fear from the Sandusky home — during a secret police interview that took place in the middle of his father’s trial for child sex-abuse, according to a copy of the tape obtained by NBC News.     


    Follow @msnbc_us

    Matt Sandusky, 33,  said his father would enter his bedroom at night and “blow raspberries” on his stomach, then move his hand down his body, rubbing up against his genitals. Matt Sandusky said he would sometimes cower “in a fetal position” in his bed trying to avoid his father.     

    “It just was, just became very uncomfortable. You know, just with everything that was going on,” he said on the tape.    

    “What was, what was going on?” a police detective asked.    

    “With like the showering, with the hugging, with the rubbing, with the just talking to me. The way he spoke. And just, the whole interaction with him alone. Anything, anytime we were alone just those interactions…” Matt Sandusky said on the tape.     

    But unlike some of the victims who testified at Sandusky’s trial, Matt Sandusky said he could not remember if his father ever actually engaged in certain sex acts with him.  

    “You said at the beginning of our interview last night that things happened to you, but there was no, that you can recall, there was no penetration or oral sex. Is that correct?” the police detective asked.  

    “Yes. As of this time, I don’t recall that.”     

    NBC News has exclusively obtained the 29-minute audiotape, which was recorded by police detectives on June 15, four days after the Jerry Sandusky trial began. At the time, the detectives were preparing Sandusky’s son to testify as a surprise prosecution witness at his father’s trial.    

    For years, Matt Sandusky had publicly stood by his father and even showed up on the first day of the trial, sitting with the rest of the Sandusky family. But after listening to the first day of testimony from a young man known in court documents as "Victim 4," Matt Sandusky contacted police and volunteered to testify on behalf of the prosecution. The prosecutors’ plan was to use Matt Sandusky as a rebuttal witness if Jerry Sandusky took the stand in his own defense.  

    It turned out to be a crucial turning point in the Sandusky trial. When Jerry Sandusky learned that his own adopted son was prepared to testify against him, it was a “complete shock," and it played a big role in his decision not to take the witness stand, according to one of his lawyers, Karl Rominger.    

    “You have to understand that Matt has worked with him, Matt has helped the defense, Matt literally carried boxes in the courthouse with us,” Rominger said. “Matt has given multiple investigators from the government and our side ironclad statements of support for his father.”    

    “That was the first day where he (Jerry Sandusky) really was visibly shaken, or upset,” Rominger added. Asked how big a role Matt Sandusky played in his client’s decision not to testify, Rominger said: “It was a huge factor.”    

    Had Matt Sandusky actually taken the stand, he added, “We would have hit Matt with both barrels. … He told the police 'no,' he told our investigator, 'no,' he told the A.G.’s office 'no,' he told the grand jury 'no.' And then one day in the middle of the trial he suddenly says, 'All these things happened?'”   

    In his interview with police, Matt Sandusky was asked directly why he decided to change his previous denials of abuse and cooperate with police.     

    “I came forward, I mean, for different reasons,” he said. “But I mean for my family you know so that they can really have closure and see what the truth actually is. And just to right the wrong, honestly, of going to the grand jury and lying.”    

    Matt Sandusky also said that he has been working with a therapist and, as a result, “more memories are coming back.”   

    Related stories

    Matt Sandusky: From staunch defender to his dad's accuser 

    Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt home where his charity was born

    Matt met Jerry Sandusky through The Second Mile, the charity the former Penn State University defensive coordinator founded to help at-risk children. Like many other Second Mile boys, he began staying overnight at the Sandusky house. Sandusky and his wife, Dottie, later became his foster parents and adopted him at age 18.    

    But Matt Sandusky told police he was molested for much of that time, saying that his father would become sexually aroused by rubbing against him in the shower, during wrestling sessions and in bed. The sexual overtures at one point caused him to try to escape his father’s clutches by fleeing from the house barefoot at night in a thunderstorm and running to his grandfather’s house to hide in the basement.    

    On another occasion, he and a girlfriend, who was also staying at the Sandusky house, tried to commit suicide by overdosing on aspirin at a hotel. Matt Sandusky told police he finds it “hard to believe” that his father’s abuse wasn’t a factor in causing him to try to kill himself, although “I don’t have any concrete evidence.”   

    “But I know that I really wanted to die at that point in time so that’s best I can really answer that.” Matt Sandusky also said that his father’s molesting stopped when he started to “transition” to another young man who used to stay at the Sandusky house. That boy, now a man known in court documents as "Victim 4," was the first witness at Sandusky’s trial, testifying to years of sexual abuse. 

    The police detective said on the tape, “You told us that you feel (Victim 4) took over for you, and that he was your dad’s transition?”

    “I believe my dad moved on from me to (Victim 4), yes,” Matt Sandusky replied.    

    In a statement Monday night to NBC News, Matt Sandusky’s lawyers, Andrew Shubin and Justine Andronici, said: “This tape demonstrates Matt’s tremendous courage and strength as he begins to disclose that Jerry Sandusky sexually abused him when he was a child. Although the tape was released without Matt’s knowledge or permission, he made the difficult decision to come forward and tell the painful truth to investigators despite the extraordinary pressure to support his father.”  

    After a two-week trial, Jerry Sandusky was convicted Friday night on 45 of 48 counts of child sex abuse. His lawyer, Rominger, said he was the first to visit Sandusky in jail Monday and described his client as defiant.    

    “He’s not a beaten man,” he said. “He is pacing a cell right now, being held in solitary confinement, wanting to get out and get his story out and continue to defend himself.” He added: “I don’t think Jerry believes there’s anything to feel sorry for. At this point, he maintains his innocence adamantly.”     

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Report: Missing oil tycoon's wife had sought divorce
    • Video: As burglars break in, calm teen dials 911
    • Supreme Court ruling leaves Arizona illegal immigrants on edge
    • Teen lesbian couple shot in Texas park

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    623 comments

    OMG...how horrific is Jerry Sandusky? have we heard all there is about the abuse he heaped on all the kids he came in contact with? I keep feeling like this was just the tip of the iceberg with this guy...we may never know just how many kids he molested....... Good for his adopted son to step up and …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: abuse, sex, jerry-sandusky, matt-sandusky
  • 23
    Jun
    2012
    8:26am, EDT

    Juror: Sandusky's lack of emotion at verdicts was 'confirmation'

    In an exclusive interview, juror Joshua Harper tells TODAY's Lester Holt that the decision to convict Jerry Sandusky hinged on the credibility of his accusers and the testimony of independent witnesses.

    By NBC News and msnbc.com staff

    A juror in the Jerry Sandusky trial said Saturday that the look on the former Penn State football coach's face as the guilty verdicts were announced was "confirmation" that they had made the right decision.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    Joshua Harper told TODAY that Sandusky had shown "no real emotion, just kind of accepting because he knew it was true," he added.


    Sandusky, 68, was convicted Friday of 45 counts of child sexual abuse and faces a minimum sentence of 60 years in prison, NBC News reported.

    The former longtime defensive coordinator for the Penn State football team had denied all 48 counts alleging that he abused 10 boys over 15 years.

    Investigations will continue in the Sandusky case related to how Penn State handled the case, and some officials are facing perjury charges. NBC's Michael Isikoff, Ron Allen, and Legal Analyst Wes Oliver join MSNBC's Ed Schultz to discuss the details of the case as well as community reaction to the verdict.

    Two grand jury reports accused him of having used his connection to one of the nation's premier college football programs to "groom" the boys, whom he met through his Second Mile charity for troubled children.

    Harper told TODAY that the jurors "were on the same page" when they began their deliberations and had focused on "the facts and determining credibility."

    MSNBC's Ed Schultz talks with Jeff Herman, an attorney who specializes in representing sexual abuse victims, about the difficulties the victims in the Sandusky case would have had in stepping forward with allegations.

    He said the men who testified that they were abused appeared to be telling the truth.

    "I think there were a couple that I felt [were] very credible. I mean, it's hard to judge character on the stand, because you don't know these kids, but most were very credible, I would say all," Harper told TODAY.

    Defense attorney Joe Amendola speaks outside the courthouse in Bellefonte, Pa., after his client, Jerry Sandusky, was found guilty of sexually abusing children.

    He added that the fact that they all told similar stories about Sandusky was "very convincing."

    Harper said they had not convicted Sandusky of rape over the incident witnessed by former Penn State assistant Mike McQueary -- who said he had "no doubt" that Sandusky engaged in anal sex with a boy in a Penn State shower -- because McQueary "did not see any actual penetration."

    Sandusky convicted of 45 counts, plans to appeal
    Reaction to the Sandusky verdict

    Analysis: Number of victims persuaded Sandusky jurors in 'he said, he said' case
    Full coverage of the Jerry Sandusky trial

    Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt home where charity was born

    "We did not have the evidence that that very first charge happened," Harper said. "We were in agreement ... that we could not convict him of that first count."

    Sandusky was acquitted on two other counts as well -- one an indecent assault charge involving "Victim 6". The man testified that Sandusky had given him a bear hug in the shower but at one point he just "blacked out."

    The other acquittal was an indecent assault charge related to "Victim 5", who said Sandusky fondled him in the shower.

    The jury had worked "very well" together, he added, discussing misgivings about some parts of the case and discussing "inconsistencies." "We were patient," he said.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:
    • Matt Sandusky: from staunch defender to damning accuser
    • State probes US visit by Egyptian tied to terrorist group
    • Iran sanctions trap both clerks, customers
    • Bullied bus monitor's vacation fund tops $500,000
    • Alleged police impersonator busted pulling over actual cop
    • Video: 10-year-old gets tattoo, grandpa gets in trouble

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook


    308 comments

    The young men did a brave and wonderful thing to finally find their voice; they are heroes to finally come forward to stop what has been going on for far too many years.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, convicted, featured, child-sexual-abuse, jerry-sandusky
  • 22
    Jun
    2012
    11:47pm, EDT

    'Landmark day': Reaction to guilty verdict in Sandusky child sex abuse trial

    Pennsylvania Attorney General Linda Kelly speaks outside the courthouse in Bellefonte after Jerry Sandusky was found guilty of child sex-abuse.

    By msnbc.com staff

    Reaction poured out in Bellefonte, Pa., and across the nation Friday night after former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky was convicted on 45 of 48 counts of child sexual abuse.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    Defense attorney Joe Amendola said he wasn't surprised by the verdict and planned an appeal. State Attorney General Linda Kelly praised investigators, prosecutors and the victims who came forward, calling them "brave men." And an advocate for victims of sexual violence called it a "landmark day."  

    Below is a selection of reaction to the verdict and the case.


    Defense attorney Joe Amendola, speaking outside the courthouse, on Sandusky’s reaction:
    “He was disappointed by the verdict but obviously he will have to live with it."

    State Attorney General Linda Kelly, speaking outside the courthouse:
    “A serious child predator ... has been held accountable for his crimes."

    Penn State University (read the full statement here):
    “The legal process has spoken and we have tremendous respect for the men who came forward to tell their stories publicly. No verdict can undo the pain and suffering caused by Mr. Sandusky, but we do hope this judgment helps the victims and their families along their path to healing. … 

    “Now that the jury has spoken, the University wants to continue that dialogue and do its part to help victims continue their path forward. To that end, the University plans to invite victims of Mr. Sandusky’s abuse to participate in a program to facilitate the resolution of claims against the University arising out of Mr. Sandusky's conduct.”

    Defense attorney Joe Amendola speaks outside the courthouse in Bellefonte, Pa., after his client, Jerry Sandusky, was found guilty of sexually abusing children.

    The family of the late Joe Paterno, former Penn State football coach, for whom Sandusky once worked (read the full statement here):
    "Although we understand the task of healing is just beginning, today's verdict is an important milestone. The community owes a measure of gratitude to the jurors for their diligent service. Our thoughts and prayers continue to be with the victims and their families. "

    Jerry Sandusky convicted of child sex abuse

    Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett, in a statement:
    “First, I want to thank the jury for their willingness to serve on such a difficult case. I also want to commend the multiple victims in this case who had the courage to come forward and testify in court, confronting Sandusky, and proving beyond a reasonable doubt that he is guilty of these reprehensible crimes.”

    Scott Berkowitz, president of the nonprofit Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network (read the full statement here):
    “Today is a landmark day for survivors of sexual violence across the nation. This verdict shows the country that when allegations of such abuse are brought to light, they will be taken seriously and that a just outcome is possible.  

    Matt Sandusky: From staunch defender to damning accuser

    Grace Gordon, 49, a Bellefonte resident at the courthouse, welcomed the verdict but lamented the damage the trial had done to the community:
    "It's hard, it really is, to see a small town torn apart like this."

    The mother of the accuser known as Victim 6, according to the AP:
    "Nobody wins. We've all lost." 

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Matt Sandusky: from staunch defender to damning accuser
    • State probes US visit by Egyptian tied to terrorist group
    • Iran sanctions trap both clerks, customers
    • Bullied bus monitor's vacation fund tops $500,000
    • Alleged police impersonator busted pulling over actual cop
    • Video: 10-year-old gets tattoo, grandpa gets in trouble

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    160 comments

    For too many years, a life time, we have kept silent about the sexual abuse of children. One in four girls is sexual abused and one in six boys are sexual abused. It is a time to talk about this openly. It is a time to finally have a voice.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: sex-abuse, crime, child-abuse, jerry-sandusky
  • 22
    Jun
    2012
    9:38pm, EDT

    Sandusky convicted of 45 counts, plans to appeal

    By Kimberly Kaplan, NBC News, and M. Alex Johnson, msnbc.com

    Handout / Reuters

    Jerry Sandusky is seen in a booking photo from the Centre County Correctional Facility in Bellefonte, Pa., on June 22, 2012.

    Updated at 11:37 p.m. ET: BELLEFONTE, Pa. — Jerry Sandusky was convicted of 45 counts of child sexual abuse Friday night and faces spending the rest of his life in state prison. His attorney said he would appeal the verdict.

    Sandusky's attorney, Joseph Amendola, asked Judge John Cleland to allow Sandusky to be released on house arrest, but Cleland summarily rejected the request, saying: "Bail is revoked. Mr. Sandusky is remanded to the custody of the sheriff."

    Michael Isikoff, John Yang, Ron Allen, Marianne Haggerty and Hannah Rapplye of NBC News and Jim Gold of msnbc.com contributed to this report by Kimberly Kaplan of NBC News and M. Alex Johnson of msnbc.com. Follow M. Alex Johnson on Twitter and Facebook.

    Sandusky was immediately led out of the courthouse in handcuffs as a large crowd of onlookers cheered. Sentencing was set for late September.

    Sandusky, 68, the former longtime defensive coordinator for the Penn State University football team, had denied all 48 counts alleging that he abused 10 boys over 15 years. Two grand jury reports accused him of having used his connection to one of the nation's premier college football programs to "groom" the boys, whom he met through his Second Mile charity for troubled children, for sexual relationships.


    Several of the counts are so-called mandated felonies, meaning Cleland has no discretion in sentencing. NBC News reported that he faces a minimum of 60 years in prison.

    NBC News

    Jerry Sandusky is led from the Centre County Courthouse in handcuffs Friday night.

    Cleland, who is a senior judge in McKean County, was brought to Centre County to oversee the trial after local judges recused themselves.

    Reaction to the Sandusky verdict

    Amendola, who was interrupted by hecklers outside the courthouse several times, said he had expected the outcome and respected the verdict of the jurors, who didn’t speak to reporters afterward.

    Amendola said he believed Sandusky had legitimate grounds for appeal, saying his client had "an uphill battle" because of the extensive pretrial publicity.

    "We said we were attempting to climb Mount Everest from the bottom of the mountain. Obviously, we didn't make it," he said.

    Defense attorney Joseph Amendola speaks outside the courthouse in Bellefonte, Pa., after his client, Jerry Sandusky, was found guilty of sexually abusing children.

    Pennsylvania Attorney General Linda Kelly, whose office prosecuted Sandusky, said, "A serious child predator ... has been held accountable for his crimes."

    Kelly thanked the victims, who she said "came forward to bravely testify in this trial and to finally put a stop to the crimes that were committed."

    "We hope that our search for justice will help them and perhaps others looking on nearby and afar," she said.

    Grace Gordon, 49, of Bellefonte, also welcomed the verdict but lamented the damage the trial had done to Bellefonte and Centre County.

    "It's hard. It really is, to see a small town torn apart like this," said Gordon, who was outside the courthouse with her 23-year-old son and his girlfriend.

    Gordon said her father, who worked with Sandusky at Penn State, "would have just been devastated to know about this."

    "You'd never, ever have dreamed that he'd be that kind of person," Gordon said. "What he did to those kids is just horrendous."

    The university that Sandusky served for decades said in a statement late Friday that "we have tremendous respect for the men who came forward to tell their stories publicly. No verdict can undo the pain and suffering caused by Mr. Sandusky, but we do hope this judgment helps the victims and their families along their path to healing."

    The university said it would seek to "fairly ... compensate" the victims and invited them to participate in a program to "facilitate the resolution of claims against the University arising out of Mr. Sandusky's conduct."

    It said it intended to get in contact with lawyers for the victims "in the near future."

    Sandusky was acquitted on three counts: an indecent assault charge involving "Victim 6", a man who testified that Sandusky had given him a bear hug in the shower but at one point he just "blacked out"; an indecent assault charge involving "Victim 5", who said Sandusky fondled him in the shower; and an involuntary deviate sexual intercourse charge regarding "Victim 2", who former assistant coach Mike McQueary said he saw being attacked in a campus shower.

    A trial that riveted the nation
    The trial, which opened June 11, culminated months of intense attention that led to the firing of head coach Joe Paterno, who won more games than any other major college football coach in history, many of them with Sandusky at his side.

    Paterno died exactly five months ago, a few weeks after the Penn State Board of Trustees dismissed him for not having done enough to stop Sandusky's abuse.

    Jurors heard often-graphic testimony from eight of the 10 victims whose accounts were included in two grand jury reports. They told how Sandusky would first win their trust by giving them gifts and taking them on trips with the football team before progressing to hugging, kissing, increasingly sexual touching and, in some cases, oral and anal sex.

    In a rare occurrence in an abuse trial, prosecutors also presented the testimony of a corroborating eyewitness — Sandusky's former Penn State coaching colleague McQueary.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    McQueary said the boy had his hands against the wall and that Sandusky was standing up against him from behind. He said he heard a "skin-on-skin smacking sound" and that he had "no doubt" that Sandusky was engaging in anal sex with the boy.

    Because they were sequestered, without access to computers, phones or any other way to hear news coverage, the jury of seven women and five men wouldn't have heard newer, potentially damaging information from two other accusers that emerged after they began deliberations.

    Sandusky's adopted son Matt said he had been prepared to testify that he, too, was a victim of abuse by his father, according to a statement issued Thursday by attorneys who said they are representing the younger Sandusky.

    (NBC News and msnbc.com generally do not identify victims of sexual assaults, but Matt Sandusky chose to identify himself in a public statement released through his attorneys.)

    Full coverage of the Jerry Sandusky trial
    Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt home where charity was born

    Legal analysis by Wes Oliver

    Matt Sandusky: From defender to possibly most damning accuser

    Amendola said Friday night that Jerry Sandusky abandoned plans to testify in his own defense because of the prospect of damaging rebuttal testimony by his son.

    Nor would they have heard the account of Travis Weaver, 30, of Ohio, who attended Second Mile camps as a youth. Weaver told NBC News in an interview that aired Thursday night that Sandusky performed oral sex on him in the upstairs bedroom of the Sanduskys' home.

    Weaver testified to one of the two grand juries but wasn't mentioned in the grand jury reports or called as a witness during the trial.

    The end of the trial doesn't mean the case is over.

    Two former top Penn State officials, former Athletic Director Timothy Curley and former vice president Gary Schultz, face perjury charges in connection with their grand jury testimony in December, in which prosecutors alleged that concealed what they knew about Sandusky's conduct.

    Law enforcement sources have told NBC News that former Penn State President Graham Spanier, who was fired in November, was under investigation for possible similar charges.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Matt Sandusky: from staunch defender to damning accuser
    • State probes US visit by Egyptian tied to terrorist group
    • Iran sanctions trap both clerks, customers
    • Bullied bus monitor's vacation fund tops $500,000
    • Alleged police impersonator busted pulling over actual cop
    • Video: 10-year-old gets tattoo, grandpa gets in trouble

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    1836 comments

    Oh boy....here we go....

    Show more
    Explore related topics: child, sex-abuse, penn-state, crime, featured, sandusky, jerry-sandusky, sandusky-trial
  • 22
    Jun
    2012
    7:57pm, EDT

    Analysis: Sandusky's lawyer jeopardized his client's interests

    By Wes Oliver, Special to msnbc.com

    ANALYSIS

    The law is pretty clear on a lawyer's ethical duty when he makes statements regarding his clients. The lawyer may neither divulge confidences nor make statements adverse to the client's interests.

    Wes OliverWes Oliver is a professor at Widener University who teaches criminal law and procedure. This fall he will join the faculty of the Duquesne University School of Law as a professor and director of the school's criminal justice program.

    The rule is clear enough, but it is violated all the time in innocuous ways. Lawyers go home to their wives and describe the horrifying day they had. They gather with other lawyers in corridors of courthouse or in local watering holes and tell stories about their cases. Arguably, lawyers could be seeking advice from their professional colleagues, thus including them in the attorney-client privilege, but usually they're just telling stories.


    In short, lawyers do describe to their friends facts surrounding their cases, and those discussions often evaluate the strength of their cases. Ideally, and most often, they omit the names of their clients, but their listeners are frequently able to identify them. One very famous lawyer routinely jokes about his former client's guilt. Alan Dershowitz said to his criminal law class at Harvard: "If O.J. does it again. ... By that, I mean gets another speeding ticket."

    Because few lawyers absolutely observe the prohibition on making statements against their clients' interest, it's often unclear precisely where the practically accepted line is. Part of the reason there's a gap between the categorical prohibition on lawyers' making statements against their clients' interest and the realities of lawyers' lives is enforcement. The odds of a communication between an attorney and his wife ever impairing his client's interest are remote. The odds that a client will ever learn of his lawyer's barroom discussion are slim. So for a lot of lawyers, the rule against making a statement against his client's interest has a practical exception — if the odds are low enough that his statement could harm his client's interest, he or she will often talk.

    Full coverage of the Jerry Sandusky trial

    Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt home where charity was born

    Legal analysis by Wes Oliver

    It's not appropriate, and I don't teach my students that this is acceptable, but for a lot of lawyers it is the reality. And it would be difficult if not impossible to police the actual rule that forbids any negative statement.

    Friday, however, Joe Amendola told a crowd of reporters in the Centre County Courthouse awaiting the verdict that he would be shocked if his client was acquitted of all the counts.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    This after months of denying Sandusky's guilt. This after an impassioned and excellent closing argument in which he explained how all the alleged victims had fallen prey to investigators' coaching and then sought to cash in.

    And, perhaps most significantly, after the judge issued a gag order expressing forbidding anyone in the case from commenting on Sandusky's guilt or innocence.

    This wasn't a comment to fellow lawyers who are unlikely to have any reason to communicate the information to others. This wasn't a private communication to his wife. His statements were made in a mini-press conference in the courtroom where his client had stood trial and where the jury could come and announce its verdict at any time. His comments were made to reporters who have the right — arguably the obligation — to report his words to a national audience that has been captivated by this case.

    This wasn't a comment that could never harm his client, in other words. There could be a hung jury, necessitating another trial. And there will surely be civil lawsuits. Amendola's comments, which will be heard throughout Centre County and around the country, could easily prejudice his clients' future interests.

    Finally, and perhaps most significantly, this isn't a comment for which there is no ready enforcement mechanism. It is unlikely that Sandusky will file a complaint with the ethics board. But Judge John Cleland, who maintained very strict control over this trial, issued a specific order forbidding comments on guilt or innocence.

    Certainly, he must have anticipated the prosecution's making disparaging comments about Sandusky, but his order didn't allow an exception for Sandusky's lawyer to suggest his own client's guilt. Cleland may well regard this as a breach of the decorum he has worked so hard to maintain. And unlike an ethics board, he has the ability to act swiftly and the power to hold Amendola in contempt.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Iran sanctions trap both clerks, customers
    • Young bullies apologize for tormenting bus monitor
    • BMW misses parking spot, lands on Jaguar, Mercedes
    • Alleged police impersonator busted pulling over actual cop
    • Video: 10-year-old gets tattoo, grandpa gets in trouble

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    63 comments

    I think he did it intentionally to attempt to get a mistrial or muck up the works against the prosecution. It'll be another excuse to keep delaying everything.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: child, sex-abuse, penn-state, crime, featured, sandusky, jerry-sandusky, wes-oliver, sandusky-trial
  • 22
    Jun
    2012
    10:36am, EDT

    Sandusky's attorney expects him to be convicted on some counts

    Jurors reheard testimony from two witnesses on their second day of deliberations in Jerry Sandusky's trial. NBC News' John Yang reports from Bellefonte, Pa.

    By M. Alex Johnson, msnbc.com, and Kimberly Kaplan, NBC News

    Updated at 7:34 p.m. ET: BELLEFONTE, Pa. — Jerry Sandusky's attorney said Friday that he expects his client to be convicted on some of the 48 child sexual abuse counts against him.

    Kimberly Kaplan of NBC News reported from Bellefonte, Pa. M. Alex Johnson is a reporter for msnbc.com. Follow M. Alex Johnson on Twitter and Facebook.

    "I would die of a heart attack — shocked — if he was acquitted on all of the charges," Joseph Amendola, the head of Sandusky's defense team, told reporters in Centre County Court.

    "It is just statistically unlikely," he said.

    Jurors were into their 19th hour of deliberations in the trial of Sandusky, 68, the former defensive coordinator for Penn State University's storied football team and founder of the Second Mile charity for troubled children. He denies all 48 counts in two grand jury reports alleging that he abused 10 boys over 15 years.


    Amendola spoke to reporters for a few minutes inside the courthouse before a court official cut him off. Judge John Cleland has issued a gag order prohibiting participants from making public statements "regarding the Defendant's guilt or innocence" (.pdf).

    Before he was hustled away, Amendola acknowledged that "it's a daunting, daunting case," but he said Sandusky has "always been optimistic." 

    There was still no indication when the jurors might reach a verdict. They resumed working after dinner, just as they had Thursday night.

    Earlier Friday, the jury asked Cleland for clarification on hearsay and circumstantial evidence, an indication that they were wrestling with secondhand testimony about an incident in which Sandusky was allegedly seen in a Penn State University shower with a young boy.

    The question involved the testimony of Ronald Petrosky, a janitor at Penn State, who said that he saw "two pairs of legs" in the shower in November 2005. He said he discussed the incident with a colleague, Jim Calhoun, who told him that he had seen Sandusky performing oral sex on the boy, who is identified in a grand jury report as "Victim 8."

    Calhoun is hospitalized with dementia and didn't testify. Cleland allowed Petrosky's secondhand testimony under an exception to rules barring hearsay evidence.

    Cleland instructed the jurors that "the statement of Mr. Calhoun as related to you by Mr. Petrosky is not sufficient standing alone to sustain a conviction."

    Full coverage of the Jerry Sandusky trial

    Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt home where charity was born

    Legal analysis by Wes Oliver

    "You must be satisfied that there is other evidence that supports that a crime had been committed besides Mr. Calhoun's hearsay statement," he stressed.

    Thursday night, jurors told Cleland that they wanted to rehear the testimony of former Penn State assistant coach Michael McQueary, who testified that he overheard and saw Sandusky apparently having sex with a young boy in a football locker room shower, and Jonathan Dranov, a family friend who testified that McQueary told him about incident. Both men's testimony was re-enacted Friday morning.

    McQueary testified last week that he saw a young boy — identified in the first grand jury report as "Victim 2" — in a Penn State shower with his hands against the wall and Sandusky standing up against him from behind. He said he heard a "skin-on-skin smacking sound" and that he had "no doubt" that Sandusky was engaging in anal sex with the boy.

    Testifying for the defense this week, Dranov said McQueary described hearing sounds he considered sexual in nature but didn't give a graphic description of what he saw.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    "I kept saying, 'What did you see?'" Dranov testified. "Each time, he would come back to the sounds. It just seemed to make him more upset, so I backed off that."

    The lead defense attorney, Joseph Amendola, argued in his closing statements Thursday that McQueary "assumed" sex was occurring without having actually seen any.

    And he contended that Dranov must not have believed that the incident was as serious as he later said because he didn't report it to police. As a physician, Dranov is required by law to report any indication of child abuse.

    The jury of seven women and five men is being sequestered during deliberations without access to computers, phones or any other way to hear news coverage of the trial. That means they wouldn't have heard that Sandusky's adopted son Matt said that he had been prepared to testify that he, too, was a victim of abuse by his father, according to a statement issued by attorneys who said they are representing the younger Sandusky.

    (NBC News and msnbc.com generally do not identify victims of sexual assaults, but Matt Sandusky chose to identify himself in a public statement released through his attorneys.)

    Sources told NBC News that Jerry Sandusky abandoned plans to testify in his own defense because of the prospect of damaging rebuttal testimony by his son.

    Matt Sandusky: From stalwart defender to possibly his father's most damning accuser

    Travis Weaver, who alleges that he was abused by former Penn State assistant coach Jerry Sandusky, tells NBC Bews' Kate Snow, "I'll be OK when he's in prison."

    Nor would they have heard the account of Travis Weaver, 30, of Ohio, who attended Second Mile camps as a youth. Weaver told NBC News in an interview that aired Thursday night that Sandusky performed oral sex on him in the upstairs bedroom of the Sanduskys' home.

    Weaver testified to one of the two grand juries but wasn't mentioned in the grand jury reports or called as a witness during the trial.

    Several of the counts are so-called mandated felonies, meaning Cleland would have no discretion in sentencing. Most carry sentences of 10 to 20 years in prison, meaning that even if he is convicted on only a handful of those counts, Sandusky could spend the rest of his life in prison.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • BMW misses parking spot, lands on Jaguar, Mercedes
    • Alleged police impersonator busted pulling over actual cop
    • $150,000 Salvador Dali painting stolen from art gallery
    • Video: 10-year-old gets tattoo, grandpa gets in trouble
    • Park ranger falls to death during Mt. Rainier rescue

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    268 comments

    It is obvious that McQueary both saw and heard something that upset him. The fact that he had difficulty discussing this with people is very understandable. The sounds bothered him more than the sight of the abuse. Dr. Dranov was another of a half dozen people who dropped the ball for these kids, by …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: child, sex-abuse, penn-state, crime, featured, sandusky, jerry-sandusky, sandusky-trial
Newer postsOlder posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • crime,
  • military,
  • weather,
  • california,
  • updated,
  • florida,
  • environment,
  • us-news,
  • shooting,
  • new-york,
  • texas,
  • education,
  • chicago,
  • police,
  • gulf-oil-spill,
  • kari-huus,
  • nbcnewyork,
  • los-angeles,
  • murder,
  • new-jersey,
  • guns,
  • afghanistan,
  • obama,
  • colorado,
  • sandy,
  • trayvon-martin,
  • nbclosangeles,
  • barack-obama,
  • crime-and-courts,
  • politics,
  • gay,
  • veterans,
  • connecticut,
  • fire,
  • arizona,
  • snow,
  • crime-courts,
  • religion
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Bill Dedman

Investigative reporter Bill Dedman of NBC News is always looking for good investigative story ideas and documents. Bill received the 1989 Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting, and has written full time for NBCNews.com since 2006.

Bill Dedman Blogroll

  • Bill's investigative reporting feed on Twitter
  • ABC News The Blotter
  • Center for Investigative Reporting
  • Center for Public Integrity
  • Center for Public Integrity's Paper Trail blog
  • Huffington Post Investigative Fund
  • Investigative Reporters and Editors' Extra! Extra!
  • McClatchey blog Nukes & Spooks
  • New York Times' City Room Records blog
  • New York Times' Open data blog
  • ProPublica
  • ProPublica blog
  • Yahoo! News The Upshot
  • TPM Muckraker
  • Washington Post Investigations
  • WhoWhatWhy forensic journalism
  • New England Center for Investigative Center at Bos
  • Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism
  • Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting
  • Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism, B
  • MinnPost.com
  • The Washington Independent
  • AU Investivative Reporting Workshop
  • Become a fan on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
Have an idea?
Send your ideas and documents for investigative stories.

Vignesh Ramachandran

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (376)
    • April (608)
    • March (548)
    • February (510)
    • January (563)
  • 2012
    • December (457)
    • November (460)
    • October (477)
    • September (432)
    • August (525)
    • July (519)
    • June (508)
    • May (566)
    • April (538)
    • March (576)
    • February (471)
    • January (417)
  • 2011
    • December (455)
    • November (190)
    • October (9)
    • September (3)
    • August (51)
    • July (8)
    • June (3)
    • May (12)
    • April (5)
    • March (3)
    • February (1)
    • January (8)
  • 2010
    • December (5)
    • November (1)
    • October (2)
    • September (28)
    • August (40)
    • July (35)
    • June (177)
    • May (50)
    • April (9)
    • March (2)
    • February (2)
    • January (4)
  • 2009
    • December (5)
    • November (5)
    • October (2)
    • September (11)
    • August (4)
    • July (12)
    • June (1)
    • May (1)
    • April (1)
    • March (3)
    • February (3)
    • January (2)
  • 2008
    • December (3)
    • November (2)
    • October (6)
    • September (30)
    • August (26)
    • July (10)
    • June (4)
    • May (8)
    • April (13)
    • March (9)
    • February (7)
    • January (6)
  • 2007
    • December (10)
    • November (6)
    • October (22)
    • September (11)

Most Commented

  • Man with ties to Boston bombing suspect admits role in 2011 murders; shot during FBI questioning (2111)
  • Boy Scouts vote to lift ban on gay youth (4254)
  • US judge rules department of 'toughest sheriff' engages in racial profiling (2063)
  • At least 51 killed, including 20 children, as tornado tears through Oklahoma (1809)
  • Scouts await decision on gay membership (2226)
  • Zimmerman defense releases texts about guns, fighting from Trayvon Martin's phone (1743)
  • Jodi Arias pleads for jury to spare her life, says, 'I want everyone's pain to stop' (854)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • US news on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise