• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: North Carolina governor signs law aimed at restarting executions
  • Recommended: Julian Assange says WikiLeaks helping Snowden gain asylum
  • Recommended: 'Modern-day slavery': State Dept. says millions of human trafficking victims go unidentified
  • Recommended: Naval Academy files sex assault charges against three football players

NBC News reporters bring you compelling stories from across the nation. For more US news, follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 26
    Jul
    2012
    1:35pm, EDT

    Lawyers: Phone audio is Sandusky calling shower abuse victim

    The young man known as "Victim 2" in the Jerry Sandusky sex abuse case spoke out for the first time through his attorneys about how the former Penn State coach abused him and stalked him with phone messages. NBC's Ron Allen reports.

    Gene J. Puskar / AP

    Former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky is awaiting sentencing for sexually abusing boys, including one identified in court documents as Victim 2.

    By NBC News staff and wire services

    Updated at 8:01 a.m. ET on July 27: HARRISBURG, Pa. -- Lawyers for a man who claims to be the unknown victim abused in a Penn State shower by Jerry Sandusky in a case that led to Joe Paterno's firing say he intends to sue the university.

    The lawyers also released two audio clips that they say are phone mail messages from Sandusky to their client, referred to in court documents as Victim 2.

    In the messages from September 2011, which can be heard in the links below provided by the lawyers, Sandusky talks about moving forward and having nothing to hide. In one message, Sandusky offers an invitation to a Penn State football game. He ends both calls with "love you."

     


    Follow @msnbc_us

     


    You can hear audio of an alleged message from Sept. 12, 2011, here.

    You can hear audio of an alleged message from Sept. 19, 2011, here.

    The lawyers, Andrew Shubin, Justine Andronici, Matt Casey and Joel Feller, said in a statement that they have done an extensive investigation and gathered "overwhelming evidence" on details of the abuse.

    The statement reads in part:

    "Our client suffered extensive sexual abuse over many years both before and after the 2001 incident Michael McQueary witnessed in the Penn State Lasch building shower. Penn State has now admitted and there is no longer any question that its top officials could have and should have prevented these acts. Jerry Sandusky's abuse of Victim 2 and other children is a direct result of a conspiracy to conceal Sandusky's conduct and the decisions by top Penn State officials that facilitated and enabled his access to victims. We intend to file a civil lawsuit against Penn State University and others and to hold them accountable for the egregious and reckless conduct that facilitated the horrific abuse our client suffered.

    Our client has to live the rest of his life not only dealing with the effects of Sandusky's childhood sexual abuse, but also with the knowledge that many powerful adults, including those at the highest levels of Penn State, put their own interests and the interests of a child predator above their legal obligations to protect him."

    Penn State says it cannot comment on pending litigation.

    Prosecutors have said they don't know the identity of the boy molested by Sandusky in 2001. The encounter was spotted by former graduate assistant football coach, Mike McQueary, who reported the abuse to school officials, including Paterno, but none of them told police. McQueary said he saw Sandusky and the boy -- now a grown man -- in an "extremely sexual" position in a locker room shower one night. He was a key prosecution witness at Sandusky's trial.

    The victim is not named in the attorneys' statement.

    Lawyers representing a man claiming to be the unidentified shower victim of former football coach Jerry Sandusky say audio recordings are phone messages to their client.

    Sandusky awaits sentencing after being convicted in June of 45 sex abuse counts related to molesting 10 boys, including Victim 2.

    A seven-month investigation by former FBI Director Louis Freeh, commissioned by Penn State, concluded that Paterno, then-university President Graham Spanier and two other top Penn State administrators concealed abuse by Sandusky to avoid bad publicity, thereby enabling Sandusky's crimes to continue.

    Below is a transcription of the phone mail messages:

     Sept. 12, 2011:

    "…Jere. Um. I am probably not going to be able to get a hold of anybody. Um. Uh. Probably ought to just go forward. Uh. I would be very firm and express my feelings, uh, upfront. Um. But, uh, you know, there is nothing really to hide so. Um. If you want, give me a call. You can call me on my other cell phone or on this one, either one so. Alright, take care. Love you. Uh. Hope you get this message. Thanks."

     Sept. 19, 2011:

    "…Just calling to see you know whether you had any interest in going to the Penn State game this Saturday. Uh. If you could get back to me and let me know, uh, I would appreciate it and when you get this message, uh, give me a call and I hope to talk to you later. Thanks. I love you.”

     

    More content from NBCNews.com: 

    • Shotgun pellet's 'miracle' path through brain spares woman
    • Areas in worst drought categories rise 50 percent
    • Video shows child's rescue from hot car
    • 78 inmates get into jailhouse brawl in Los Angeles
    • Four NYC beachgoers punctured by needles
    • Gun owners: 'We are your neighbors, co-workers, friends'

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    216 comments

    It will be interesting to see if anyone sues Dottie Sandusky.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, crime, joe-paterno, featured, child-sex-abuse, sandusky
  • 24
    Jul
    2012
    1:00pm, EDT

    Ex-Penn State president says he didn't protect Sandusky, was himself an abused child

    Gene Puskar / AP

    Former Penn State President Graham Spanier walks on the field in 2011 before an NCAA college football game in State College, Pa.

    By Bill Dedman, Investigative Reporter, NBC News

    The former president of Pennsylvania State University, Graham Spanier, has written a letter to the university trustees denying he shielded Jerry Sandusky, the child molesting assistant football coach.

    Spanier rebuts the claim in the university-sponsored report by Louis Freeh, the former FBI director, that Spanier and other officials enabled Sandusky's crimes to continue and failed to show empathy for the victims. Spanier also says that he himself was the victim of abuse as a child and would never cover up or defend such action. He doesn't specify what kind of abuse he suffered, but he has previously described being beaten by his father; his attorney said Spanier was not referring to sexual abuse.


    Follow Open Channel from NBC News on Twitter and Facebook.


    "It is unfathomable and illogical to think that a respected family sociologist and family therapist," Spanier wrote, "someone who personally experienced massive and persistent abuse as a child, someone who devoted a significant portion of his career to the welfare of children and youth, including service on the boards of four such organizations, two as chair of the board, would have knowingly turned a blind eye to any report of child abuse or predatory sexual acts directed at children. As I have stated in the clearest possible terms, at no time during my presidency did anyone ever report to me that Jerry Sandusky was observed abusing a child or youth or engaged in a sexual act with a child or youth.


    "Had I known then what we now know about Jerry Sandusky, had I received any information about a sexual act in the shower or elsewhere, or had I had some basis for a higher level of suspicion about Sandusky, I would have strongly and immediately intervened," Spanier wrote. "Never would I stand by for a moment to allow a child predator to hurt children. I am personally outraged that any such abusive acts could have occurred in or around Penn State and have considerable pain that it could perhaps have been ended had we known more sooner."

    ESPN has published the full letter, first reported by The Patriot-News, which is available here.

    Spanier's lawyer, Peter Vaira, told the Associated Press on Tuesday that Spanier received regular "disciplinary beatings" by his father, and had to have his nose straightened several times. Vaira said the abuse was never sexual. 

    The Freeh report faulted Spanier, citing a long email trail showing he was informed of the 1998 investigation and the 2001 incident.

    "By not promptly and fully advising the Board of Trustees about the 1998 and 2001 child sexual abuse allegations against Sandusky and the subsequent Grand Jury investigation of him, Spanier failed his duties as President," the report says.

    The report said that "the avoidance of the consequences of bad publicity" was the most significant cause for the failure to protect child victims and report abuse to authorities.

    More coverage:

    • The Freeh report: What it says about Penn State officials
    • Freeh report increases the legal risks for Spanier
    • Analysis: Paterno could've been indicted if he'd lived
    • Report: Paterno, others hid Sandusky sexual abuse

    Click here to sign up to receive our Top News email each day.

    Spanier describes the 1998 and 2001 incidents

    In his letter to the trustees, Spanier makes several specific rebuttals to the Freeh report.

    First, Spanier says he thought that a 1998 investigation of Sandusky was being appropriately handled:

    "I was apparently copied on two emails in 1998, the first, from Gary Schultz to Tim Curley on May 6 saying that 'the Public Welfare people will interview the individual Thursday.' The second email, from Schultz to Curley on June 9, says 'They met with Jerry on Monday and concluded that there was no criminal behavior and the matter was closed as an investigation. He was a little emotional and expressed concern as to how this might have adversely affected the child. I think the matter has been appropriately investigated and I hope it is now behind us.' I have no recollection of any conversations on the topic or any other emails from that era sent to me or by me. It is public knowledge that the District Attorney decided there was no crime to pursue. I don’t understand how one could conclude from such evidence 'concealment' of a known child predator."

    Then Spanier provides more information about a 2001 incident in which coaching assistant Mike McQueary reported seeing Sandusky nude with a boy in a shower. He says university officials Tim Curley and Gary Schultz assured him that the information was not reported as a sexual incident, a sex act, but  as one that appeared inappropriate, "horsing around" nude in the shower:

    "I can assure you that I hadn’t the slightest inkling until reading the Grand Jury presentment that Sandusky was being investigated for more than a single incident in a shower in 2001, something that was described to me only as 'horsing around.'

    "I never heard a word about abusive or sexual behavior, nor were there any other details presented that would have led me to think along those lines. McQueary’s name was never mentioned to me, and it is clear that Curley and Schultz had not spoken to him yet when they gave me their initial heads up. I was in fact told that the witness wasn’t sure what he saw, since it was around a corner. Dr. Jonathan Dranov’s Grand Jury and trial testimony appear to corroborate that nothing sexual was reported to him in his meeting with McQueary on the night of the 2001 incident."

    Spanier also says that he shared with the trustees what he knew in 2011, when Sandusky was being investigated by a grand jury, but that the university's general counsel kept him mostly in the dark.

    Detail on the 2001 incident
    Spanier supplemented his letter with details on the information he says he received about the 2001 incident in the shower. Here is his account in full:

    Initial Heads Up

    More than a decade ago, Tim Curley and Gary Schultz asked to catch me after another meeting to give me a “heads up” about a matter. Looking back at my calendar for what is now presumed to be February, 2001, I surmise that meeting to have been on Monday, February 12, at about 2:30pm, following a scheduled meeting of the President’s Council. It was common that members of the council would catch me individually for brief updates following such meetings.

    The meeting lasted perhaps 10-15 minutes. Curley and Schultz shared that they had received a report that a member of the athletic department staff had reported something to Joe Paterno, and that Joe had passed that report on to Tim and Gary. The report was that Jerry Sandusky was seen in an athletic locker room facility showering with one of his Second Mile youth, after a workout, and that they were “horsing around” (or “engaged in horseplay”). It was reported that the staff member was not sure what he saw because it was around a corner and indirect.

    I recall asking two questions:

    “Are you sure that is how it was described to you, as horsing around”? Both replied “yes.”

    “Are you sure that that is all that was reported?” Both replied “yes.”

    We then agreed that we were uncomfortable with such a situation, that it was inappropriate, and that we did not want it to happen again. I asked that Tim meet with Sandusky to tell him that he must never again bring youth into the showers. We further agreed that we should inform the Second Mile president that we were we directing Jerry to never do this again and furthermore that we did not wish Second Mile youth to be in our showers.

    Notes:

    There was no mention of anything abusive, sexual, or criminal.

    At no time was it said who had made the report to Joe Paterno. (I never heard Mike McQuery’s name associated with this episode until November 7, 2011, when I read it in a newspaper story.)

    The hour of the day was not mentioned.

    The specific building and locker room were not mentioned.

    The age of the child was not mentioned. I had presumed it was a high school age child under Jerry’s guardianship or sponsorship, since that is all I knew about the Second Mile.

    There was no mention of any prior shower incident, and I had no recollection of having heard of a prior incident.

    Follow Up

    In reviewing my calendar for February, 2001, I note a double entry for Sunday, February 25. I had been out of town for several days and was scheduled to return in time to see a Penn State women’s basketball game at 2pm. My assistant noted on the calendar that I should stop in to see Tim Curley briefly in my way into the game. I have no recollection of that meeting other than that Tim was worried about how he shouldhandle things if he informed Sandusky that we were forbidding him from bringing Second Mile youth into our facilities and then Sandusky disagreed with this directive. I do not recall knowing about any prior incidents, but it is apparent from emails recently released to the media that Tim also indicated that there had been an earlier occasion when Sandusky had showered with a minor. We also now know that I was copied on two emails in 1998 that may have alerted me to that (the first one being a vague reference with no individual named) and the second essentially saying that the matter had been closed. I had absolutely no recollection of that history in 2001 nor do I recall it today. I don’t believe I replied to those emails nor was I briefed verbally.

    Tim Curley sent me a follow up email that has recently been shared with the news media. My use of the word “humane” refers specifically and only to my thought that it was humane of Tim to wish to inform Sandusky first and to allow him to accompany Tim to the meeting with the president of the Second Mile. Moreover, it would be humane to offer counseling to Sandusky if he didn’t understand why this was inappropriate and unacceptable to us. My comment that we could be vulnerable for not reporting it further relates specifically and only to Tim’s concern about the possibility that Jerry would not accept our directive and repeat the practice. Were that the outcome of his discussion I would have worried that we did not enlist more help in enforcing such a directive. I suggested that we could visit that question down the road, meaning after Curley informed Sandusky of our directive and learning of his willingness to comply.

    A few days after the brief Sunday interaction, I saw Tim Curley and he reported that both of the discussions had taken place, that those discussions had gone well and our directive accepted, and that the matter was closed.

    I never heard another word about this from any individual until I learned of the investigation into Sandusky. I was eager to assist the attorney general and was completely honest to the best of my recollection. I had absolutely no idea until midway through my voluntary grand jury testimony that this inquiry was about anything more than the one episode in the shower.

    Notes:

    I do not recall that I was privy to any follow up discussions between Curley, Schultz, legal counsel, or others. I had five out of town trips that month, my appropriations hearings, THON, a packed calendar with 164 appointments, an average of 100 incoming and 50 outgoing emails a day, and the turmoil of the Black Caucus disruption and the takeover of the student union.

    I do not recall being involved in any discussions about DPW or the police, although I now assume that DPW is the “other organization” being referenced by Curley and Schultz in their emails.

     

    Submit ideas Share your story ideas with Open Channel

    Send documents Send us a document

    Facebook Follow Open Channel on Facebook

    Twitter Keep up with Open Channel on Twitter

    E-mail alerts Sign up for e-mail alerts

    398 comments

    Boo freakin hooo!!! ANYONE that even had the slightest whiff of these horrific crimes should have done everything and anything to stop them. Otherwise you are GUILTY!!!!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, joe-paterno, featured, sexual-abuse, jerry-sandusky, graham-spanie
  • 22
    Jul
    2012
    7:53am, EDT

    Statue of famed Penn State coach Paterno taken down

    A statue of famed Penn State football coach Joe Paterno has been removed following the report that he knew Jerry Sandusky was being investigated for child sex abuse. NBC's Michael Isikoff reports.

    By NBC News staff and wire services

    Updated at 6:44 p.m. ET: STATE COLLEGE, Pa. - The famed statue of Joe Paterno was taken down from outside the Penn State football stadium Sunday, eliminating a key piece of the iconography surrounding the once-sainted football coach accused of burying child sex abuse allegations against a retired assistant.

    Workers lifted the statue off its base and used a forklift to move it into Beaver Stadium as the 100 to 150 students watching chanted, "We are Penn State."


    Construction vehicles and police arrived shortly after dawn Sunday, barricading the street and sidewalks near the statue, erecting a chain-link fence then concealing the statue with a blue tarp.

    Read the latest on the story on NBCSports: Paterno statue removed

    The statue, nearly 7 feet tall and weighing more than 900 pounds, was built in 2001 in honor of Paterno's record-setting 324th Division 1 coaching victory and his "contributions to the university." 

    CFT: 'Take (Paterno) statue down or we will,' banner says

    The university said it would take down the larger-than-life monument in the face of an investigative report by former FBI Director Louis Freeh that found the late coach, along with three top Penn State administrators, concealed the abuse claims against Jerry Sandusky more than a decade ago in order to shield the university and its football program from negative publicity.

    Pat Little / Reuters; Patrick Smith / Getty Images

    The site outside Beaver Stadium before and after the statue's removal.

    Penn State President Rodney Erickson explained  the decision to remove the statue in a statement that read in part:

    With the release of Judge Freeh's Report of the Special Investigative Counsel, we as a community have had to confront a failure of leadership at many levels. The statue of Joe Paterno outside Beaver Stadium has become a lightning rod of controversy and national debate, including the role of big time sports in university life. The Freeh Report has given us a great deal to reflect upon and to consider, including Coach Paterno's legacy.

    Throughout Penn State, the two most visible memorials to Coach Paterno are the statue at Beaver Stadium and the Paterno Library. The future of these two landmarks has been the topic of heated debate and many messages have been received in various University offices, including my own. We have heard from numerous segments of the Penn State community and others, many of whom have differing opinions. These are particularly important decisions when considering things that memorialize such a revered figure.

    I now believe that, contrary to its original intention, Coach Paterno's statue has become a source of division and an obstacle to healing in our University and beyond. For that reason, I have decided that it is in the best interest of our university and public safety to remove the statue and store it in a secure location. I believe that, were it to remain, the statue will be a recurring wound to the multitude of individuals across the nation and beyond who have been the victims of child abuse.

    The family of Paterno said the statue's removal "does not serve the victims" of the abuse scandal. A family statement issued Sunday said the only way to help the victims was  to "uncover the full truth." The family has previously said they do not agree with the conclusions of the Freeh report and planed to commission their own investigation.

    Presideent Barack Obama feels the removal of the statue is "the right decision," White House spokesman Jay Carney said.

    Meanwhile, the National Collegiate Athletic Association said it would announce "corrective and punitive measures" for Penn State on Monday in the aftermath of the child sex abuse scandal. NCAA President Mark Emmert hasn't ruled out the possibility of shutting down the Penn State football program for a year or more in the wake of the scandal, adding that he had "never seen anything as egregious."

    Target for critics
    The bronze sculpture outside Beaver Stadium has been a rallying point for students and alumni outraged over Paterno's firing four days after Sandusky's Nov. 5 arrest -- and grief-stricken over the Hall of Fame coach's Jan. 22 death at age 85.

    MSNBC's Thomas Roberts talks to Michael McCann, Legal Analyst and Columnist at Sports Illustrated, about the deal Joe Paterno worked about with Penn State prior to his departure from the University.

    But it turned into a target for critics after the Freeh report's stunning allegation of a cover-up by Paterno, ousted President Graham Spanier and two Penn State officials, Athletic Director Tim Curley and Vice President Gary Schultz. Their failure to report Sandusky to child-welfare authorities in 2001 allowed him to continue molesting boys, the report found.

    Erickson admitted that the school had made mistakes in its handling of the affair, and said the university had become more aware of the issues of child abuse as a result of the scandal that engulfed the school. 

    CFT: Penn State to respond to NCAA, statue issues

    Paterno's family, along with attorneys for Spanier, Curley and Schultz, vehemently deny any suggestion they protected a pedophile. Curley and Schultz await trial on charges of failing to report child abuse and lying to a grand jury but maintain their innocence. Spanier hasn't been charged. Sandusky was convicted last month of 45 counts of sexual abuse of 10 boys.

    NBC's Bob Costas says Joe Paterno's reputation can never fully recover from the Penn State sexual abuse scandal, and now the NCAA plans to step up their investigation.

    Some newspaper columnists and former Florida State coach Bobby Bowden have said the statue should be taken down, while a small plane pulled a banner over State College reading, "Take the statue down or we will."

    But Paterno still has plenty of fans, and Penn State's decision to remove the monument won't sit well with them. One student even vowed to "chain myself to that statue" if there was an attempt to remove it.

    Three men claim abuse by Sandusky in '70s or '80s

    University officials had called the issue a sensitive one in light of Paterno's enormous contributions to the school over a 61-year coaching career. The Paterno family is well-known in the community for philanthropic efforts, including the millions of dollars they've donated to the university to help build a library and fund endowments and scholarships.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Victims who died include girl, sailor, aspiring sportscaster
    • Police: Trip wire, bomb disarmed at suspect's apartment
    • Photos of James Holmes, camp counselor for underprivileged kids
    • Shooting survivor: Boyfriend 'took a bullet for me'
    • FBI: Missing Iowa girls believed to be alive

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook


     

    265 comments

    GOOD

    Show more
    Explore related topics: sex-abuse, penn-state, joe-paterno, statue, featured, sandusky
  • 17
    Jul
    2012
    6:37pm, EDT

    Airplane banner tells Penn State: Take Joe Paterno statue down

    Gene J. Puskar / AP

    The statue of former Penn State University head football coach Joe Paterno stands outside Beaver Stadium in State College, Pa.

    By James Eng and Vignesh Ramachandran, NBC News

    A small plane flew around the Penn State campus in State College, Pa., on Tuesday with a banner urging that the school dismantle the statue of football coach Joe Paterno.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    "Take the statue down or we will," the banner said.

    The incident follows the release Thursday of former FBI Director Louis Freeh's report that accused Paterno of helping to cover up child abuse by assistant coach Jerry Sandusky.


    And it comes on a day when Brown University, Paterno's alma mater, said it was taking his name off an annual athletic award, and a Penn State student group that manages a rallying spot for the Nittany Lions' football games changed the spot's name from "Paternoville" to "Nittanyville."

    National Sky Ads, the Long Island-based company that flew the banner, told NBC News that the person who hired them is "a concerned citizen" who "takes offense to certain things." The owner, who only wanted to be identified as "Ted," confirmed that this was the same person who hired an airplane banner poking fun at Tiger Woods in 2010.

    The plane is registered to Ohio-based Air America Aerial Ads, according to the Centre Daily Times. The operator of that plane, James Miller, would not identify his client, but told the Centre Daily Times that he believes in the freedom of speech.

    Related: Middle school to remove Paterno mural following Freeh report

    A Penn State spokesman, David La Torre, confirmed the banner's appearance but had no further information.

    In an interview Tuesday with WJAC-TV, Penn State President Rodney Erickson said top university officials are looking into what, if anything to do with the 7-foot statue of Paterno, which stands outside Beaver Stadium.

    “We're obviously also hearing from members of the Penn State community and far beyond. Obviously, Joe Paterno was a legend. He had a very important influence on the university for many years, so we need to look at in a comprehensive kind of fashion the things that coach Paterno did that were supportive of our educational efforts and other things,” Erickson said.

    “Obviously, as the Freeh report indicates, there were clearly very bad judgments that were made along the way with respect to the Sandusky matter and that will forever be a mark against Joe's contributions.”

    Watch US News videos on NBCNews.com

    He added: “So we need some time to separate out the positive kinds of things with respect to education, as well as the things that would serve as a very negative reminder of the consequences of possibilities of what transpired here at the university.”

    Last month, Sandusky was convicted of abusing 10 boys over 15 years, and he could face up to 373 years in prison. The Freeh report found four top university officials including Paterno, who died in January of lung cancer, could have prevented the sex abuse from continuing.

    In a new interview, Penn State president Rodney Erickson addresses questions about the university's future and the scathing report by former FBI director Louis Freeh on the Jerry Sandusky scandal.

    In the WJAC-TV interview, Erickson also said he’s still counting on the university’s insurance policies to cover the cost of settling lawsuits arising from the Sandusky scandal.

    “At this point, we're counting on insurance funding and the other sources of funding that we identified earlier in the year, which is funds that were derived from loans - interests on loans to self-supporting units within the university - including the Department of Intercollegiate Athletics.”

    He said no taxpayer, donor or tuition money would be used to pay any settlements.

    Erickson also said in the interview that the university would soon submit a response to questions from the NCAA, which is considering sanctions against the school’s sports programs.

    NCAA President Mark Emmert said the Penn State sex abuse scandal was so egregious that he would not rule out applying the so-called "death penalty" to the university – the cancellation of an entire football season.

    Asked in an interview on PBS's Tavis Smiley show Monday night about such a severe sanction, Emmert said: "I don't want to take anything off the table. The fact is this is completely different than ... anything else we have dealt with."

    "I don't know that past precedent makes particularly good sense in this case," Emmert said.

    Once Penn State responds to the NCAA's letter, the organization will decide whether to press charges against the college.

    Reuters contributed to this report.

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • US tough on saving elephants from slaughter? Hardly, says WWF
    • Uncloaked: Army testing new camo to replace flawed design
    • 'No relief' from drought as heat returns to Midwest, Northeast
    • Boy Scouts: We're keeping policy banning gays
    • Video: Bus driver catches girl, 7, in three-story plunge

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    418 comments

    "PAPA JOES A HERO!!!!" "HE DID SO MUCH!!!!"...really? like what? what the hell did he do but coach football? he coached a childs game that has become overly cherished into something that actually takes a stance at helping humanity. He did nothing, nothing at all to either help or advance humanity. N …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: joe-paterno, state-college, penn-state-university, jerry-sandusky
  • 16
    Jul
    2012
    12:25pm, EDT

    Paterno family to conduct own investigation in Sandusky sex abuse case

    Nabil K. Mark / AP

    The family of the late Penn State football coach Joe Paterno is unhappy with the findings of an investigation into the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal.

    By NBC News staff

    Lawyers for the family of Joe Paterno say they will do their own investigation of the late Penn State football coach's involvement with the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse case, reiterating that they disagree with a report that concluded Paterno and others withheld information that could have prevented further abuse.

    In a statement emailed to NBC News, the family said it was "dismayed" by parts of the report released last week by Louis Freeh, the former FBI director who conducted an investigation for the university in the Sandusky scandal.


    Follow @msnbc_us


    The Freeh report concluded that Paterno and other university leaders "repeatedly concealed critical facts" relating to assistant coach Sandusky’s child sex abuse from authorities.

    Paterno's family say they will not be issuing any further comment until they have done their own review. 

    Below is the family statement:

    Following the release of the Grand Jury findings last fall, Joe Paterno called for a thorough, fair and transparent investigation. Like everyone else, Joe was stunned at the charges that were filed against Jerry Sandusky. At the same time, Joe cautioned against a rush to judgment on Penn State and its senior officials and reminded everyone that we owed it to the victims to uncover the full truth.

    The announcement of the findings by the Freeh Group is yet another shocking turn of events in this crisis. We are dismayed by, and vehemently disagree with, some of the conclusions and assertions and the process by which they were developed. Mr. Freeh presented his opinions and interpretations as if they were absolute facts. We believe numerous issues in the report, and his commentary, bear further review.

    Our interest has been and remains the uncovering of the truth. We have never tried to run from this crisis or shift all responsibility to others. To help prevent this sort of tragedy from happening again at Penn State or any other institution, it is imperative that the full story be told.

    After the report was released, we instructed our attorneys and their experts to conduct a comprehensive review of the materials released by the Freeh Group as well as Mr. Freeh's presentation and press conference. We have also asked them to go beyond the report and identify additional information that should be analyzed. And we have asked the Freeh Group to preserve all records, notes and other materials related to the investigation and the presentation of their findings as we expect they will be the subject of great interest in the future.

    To those who are convinced that the Freeh report is the last word on this matter, that is absolutely not the case. Since various investigations and legal cases are still pending, it is highly likely that additional critical information will emerge. With that said, we want to take this opportunity to reiterate that Joe Paterno did not shield Jerry Sandusky from any investigation or review. The 1998 incident was fully and independently investigated by law enforcement officials. The Freeh report confirms this. It is also a matter of record that Joe Paterno promptly and fully reported the 2001 incident to his superiors. It can certainly be asserted that Joe Paterno could have done more. He acknowledged this himself last fall. But to claim that he knowingly, intentionally protected a pedophile is false.

    The process of reviewing the report and other relevant information is going to be a complicated and time consuming exercise. It took the Freeh Group roughly seven months to conduct more than 400 interviews and review three million documents. We do not expect or intend to duplicate this effort but we are going to be as thorough as reasonably possible. In the meantime, our attorneys have asked that we not make any further comment on this matter until they are ready to provide an update on their progress.

    More on Penn State investigation:

    Penn State to renovate showers, locker room where Sandusky abused boys

    Report finds Penn State president, Paterno concealed facts about Sandusky sex abuse

    Sandusky scandal shows danger of larger-than-life boss

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Hundreds search for missing young Iowa cousins
    • Artist removes Joe Paterno's halo from Penn State mural
    • 'English-only' city council proposal ignites debate
    • New sketch released of suspect in shooting of lesbian teen couple
    • Video: Couple lives in a 240 square foot apartment

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    351 comments

    Give it up. JoePa is just as guilty as the rest and now his family just wants to protect their money when the civil suits start. They should just lower their heads in shame over all of this and fade away.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: education, penn-state, crime, joe-paterno, child-abuse, sandusky
  • 12
    Jul
    2012
    12:21pm, EDT

    Analysis: Paterno could have been indicted if he had lived

    NBC's Bob Costas says Joe Paterno's reputation can never fully recover from the Penn State sexual abuse scandal, and now the NCAA plans to step up their investigation.

    By Wesley Oliver, NBC News Legal Analyst

    The Freeh Report is a scathing indictment, to speak colloquially, of officials at Penn State. But it could also preview actual indictments against Graham Spanier, Tim Curley, and Gary Schultz, key Penn State officials at the time Jerry Sandusky's sex abuse of minors was first being reported. And if Joe Paterno was still alive, his name could easily be added to that list.


    Follow Open Channel on Twitter and Facebook.


    The report describes many of the facts those following the case already knew, but the facts were described in a way that very clearly maps onto the elements of crimes.

    The report finds that senior officials at Penn State had no concern about the welfare of at least one victim of Sandusky's crimes and allowed Sandusky continued access to the campus, where he was able to continue to perpetrate his crimes.


    Paterno, Curley, Schultz, and Spanier were aware of an investigation about improper conduct with Sandusky in a shower with a young boy in 1998. Then, when they learned from Michael McQueary that another incident occurred -- and this time much more graphic details were provided -- they only asked Sandusky not to bring his "guests" into Penn State showers.

    Report: Penn State president, Paterno concealed facts about sex abuse

    Most substantially, the report observes, not only did Penn State officials not attempt to learn this young man's name to see if he had been harmed, they actually placed him in danger by informing Sandusky that McQueary had seen them in the shower together. In effect, university officials tipped off Sandusky to a potential child witness against him. Sandusky could have threatened the boy -- or worse -- to ensure his silence. Or Sandusky could have merely taken out his rage at being discovered on this young man he saw as the reason for the discovery.

    By not reporting Sandusky's activities and allowing him on the campus after these incidents, university officials essentially assisted Sandusky in his crimes. As the report poignantly states, university officials gave him access to the university and the trappings of a top college football program. The officials thus "provided Sandusky with the very currency that enabled him to attract his victims."

    As prosecutors decide their next move, the Freeh Report offers a description of facts tailor-made for an indictment for endangering the welfare of a minor. It provides perhaps even more.

    Typically, to conspire to commit a crime or to aid and abet a crime, you have to desire that the crime occur. No one argues that Penn State officials wanted Sandusky to rape boys. Courts, however, are beginning to recognize that for very serious crimes, if you take an action that you know assists the completion of that crime, you may well be legally responsible as a conspirator, aider or abettor. 

    If prosecutors elect to use the trend in modern conspiracy and complicity law to bring indictments in this case, the perjury and failure to report charges against Curley and Schultz will seem like minor offenses in hindsight.  And the Freeh Report gives prosecutors the ammunition to do just that.  

    The author of this piece is an NBC News legal analyst and professor at Duquesne Law School.

    The full investigative report by Louis Freeh is available in this PDF file.

    Related stories

    Matt Sandusky: From staunch defender to father's most damning accuser

    Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt empty house where his charity was born

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Report: Paterno, others hid Sandusky sexual abuse
    • Prosecutor releases another round of Zimmerman evidence
    • Caught on camera: Shark steals fish off pole
    • Guantanamo detainee who served bin Laden returns to Sudan

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    464 comments

    Wow! That is his "great legacy": The protector of a pedophile

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, joe-paterno, featured, sexual-assault, jerry-sandusky, commentid-featured
  • 12
    Jul
    2012
    7:30am, EDT

    Report finds Penn State president, Paterno concealed facts about Sandusky sex abuse

    Penn State released the findings of an internal investigation by former FBI Director Louie Freeh, which revealed how much top University officials knew about Jerry Sandusky's behavior and the failure of them to do anything about it. NBC's Michael Isikoff reports.

    By Bill Dedman, Investigative Reporter, NBC News

    Penn State football coach Joe Paterno and other university leaders "repeatedly concealed critical facts" relating to assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky’s child sex abuse from authorities, according to Louis Freeh, the former FBI director who conducted an investigation for the university in the Sandusky scandal.

    Freeh also found that "although concern to treat the child abuser humanely was expressly stated, no such sentiments were ever expressed" by university officials, including Paterno and the university president, for Sandusky’s victims. The report says that five boys were assaulted by Sandusky on university property after officials knew about a 1998 criminal investigation.

    Update: Members of the Penn State board of trustees spoke at an afternoon news conference.


    "Our hearts remain heavy, and we are deeply ashamed," said trustee Kenneth C. Frazier, chairman, CEO and president of Merck & Co., the pharmaceutical company. "An event like this can never happen again in the Penn State University community. Judge Freeh's report is both sad and sobering."

    The president of the university, Rodney A. Erickson, said, "It has become clear to me that I need to reconsider our community's leadership culture." He said the university is partnering with the Pennsylvania Coalition against Rape, and creating a center for the protection of children. "This is a problem that plagues our nation," Erickson said, "and we have a special duty" to prevent and treat child sexual abuse.

    A statue of Paterno remains outside Penn State's 106,000-seat Beaver Stadium. Members of the board of trustees were asked whether it should remain.

    "The whole topic of Joe Paterno being honored or not being honored is a very sensitive topic," said Karen B. Peetz, a banker and chairman of the board. "We believe this is something that will continue to be discussed."

    Trustee Frazier added, "You have to measure every human by the good they've done and the bad they've done. I'm not trying to make light of what we've found in the report, but I will say that if you want to measure the man's life," you have to measure the good and bad. "I think we have to take some reflection and some distance before we make decisions about what we think about Joe Paterno's entire life." 

    The Freeh report says the main cause of the university's failure was a desire to avoid bad publicity. Also contributing:

    • A striking lack of empathy for child abuse victims.
    • Lack of oversight by the board of trustees.
    • "A president who discouraged discussion and dissent."
    • Ignorance of child abuse issues and laws.
    • A football program that had opted out of university programs and training on reporting requirements.
    • "A culture of reverence for the football program that is ingrained at all levels of the campus community."

    The full investigative report is available in this PDF file.

    Freeh's findings may affect the reputation of legendary coach Paterno, who died soon after the Sandusky allegations became public, as well as the university's standing with the National Collegiate Athletic Association, which so far has not announced any punishments of Penn State. The NCAA said Thursday it is studying the report.

    Paterno had testified to a grand jury in 2011 that he knew nothing of the 1998 criminal investigation, but Freeh, based on multiple university emails, said Paterno was among the officials who knew, and who allowed Sandusky to keep his university access until 2011.


    Follow Open Channel on Twitter and Facebook.


    Summary of the report
    Freeh was hired by the university in November to review the school's dealings with Sandusky and its response to a 2001 report that he sexually abused a boy in a Penn State shower room, an incident witnessed by football assistant Michael McQueary. (McQueary's term was allowed to expire this year, and he is no longer employed by the university.)

    Freeh's team of investigators found:

    "The most saddening finding by the Special Investigative Counsel is the total and consistent disregard by the most senior leaders at Penn State for the safety and welfare of Sandusky's child victims. As the Grand Jury similarly noted in its presentment, there was no "attempt to investigate, to identify Victim 2, or to protect that child or any others from similar conduct except as related to preventing its re-occurrence on University property.

    "Four of the most powerful people at The Pennsylvania State University -- President Graham B. Spanier, Senior Vice President-Finance and Business Gary C. Schultz, Athletic Director Timothy M. Curley and Head Football Coach Joseph V. Paterno -- failed to protect against a child predator harming children for over a decade. These men concealed Sandusky's activities from the Board of Trustees, the University community and authorities. They exhibited a striking lack of empathy for Sandusky's victims by failing to inquire as to their safety and well-being, especially by not attempting to determine the identity of the child who Sandusky assaulted in the Lasch Building in 2001. Further, they exposed this child to additional harm by alerting Sandusky, who was the only one who knew the child's identity, of what McQueary saw in the shower on the night of February 9, 2001.

    "These individuals, unchecked by the Board of Trustees that did not perform its oversight duties, empowered Sandusky to attract potential victims to the campus and football events by allowing him to have continued, unrestricted and unsupervised access to the University's facilities and affiliation with the University's prominent football program. Indeed, that continued access provided Sandusky with the very currency that enabled him to attract his victims. Some coaches, administrators and football program staff members ignored the red flags of Sandusky's behaviors and no one warned the  public about him."

    Jay Paterno, the son of legendary Penn State coach Joe Paterno, says that his family is awaiting the release of former FBI director Louis Freeh's "thorough report" into the sex scandal and possible cover-up at the university.

    Mark Parker, the CEO of Nike, the athletic equipment company, said Thursday it would remove Paterno's name from a child care center. Parker had given a eulogy at Paterno's funeral, defending the coach's response to the allegations. "I have been deeply saddened by the news coming out of this investigation at Penn State," Parker said. "It is a terrible tragedy that children were unprotected from such abhorrent crimes. With the findings released today, I have decided to change the name of our child care center at our World Headquarters. My thoughts are with the victims and the Penn State community."

    Paterno family responds
    The Paterno family released a statement saying there wasn't much new in the Freeh report: "From what we have been able to assess at this time, it appears that after reviewing 3 million documents and conducting more than 400 interviews, the underlying facts as summarized in the report are almost entirely consistent with what we understood them to be. The 1998 incident was reported to law enforcement and investigated. Joe Paterno reported what he was told about the 2001 incident to Penn State authorities and he believed it would be fully investigated. The investigation also confirmed that Sandusky's retirement in 1999 was unrelated to these events."

    "One great risk in this situation," the Paterno family statement continued, "is a replaying of events from the last 15 years or so in a way that makes it look obvious what everyone must have know and should have done.  The idea that any sane, responsible adult would knowingly cover up for a child predator is impossible to accept. The far more realistic conclusion is that many people didn't fully understand what was happening and underestimated or misinterpreted events. Sandusky was a great deceiver. He fooled everyone - law enforcement, his family, coaches, players, neighbors, University officials, and everyone at Second Mile," his charity for children.

    "Joe Paterno wasn't perfect. He made mistakes and he regretted them. He is still the only leader to step forward and say that with the benefit of hindsight he wished he had done more.  To think, however, that he would have protected Jerry Sandusky to avoid bad publicity is simply not realistic. If Joe Paterno had understood what Sandusky was, a fear of bad publicity would not have factored into his actions.

    "We appreciate the effort that was put into this investigation. The issue we have with some of the conclusions is that they represent a judgment on  motives and intentions and we think this is impossible. We have said from the beginning that Joe Paterno did not know Jerry Sandusky was a child predator. Moreover, Joe Paterno never interfered with any investigation. He immediately and accurately reported the incident he was told about in 2001.

    "It can be argued that Joe Paterno should have gone further. He should have pushed his superiors to see that they were doing their jobs.  We accept this criticism. At the same time, Joe Paterno and everyone else knew that Sandusky had been repeatedly investigated by authorities who approved his multiple adoptions and foster children. Joe Paterno mistakenly believed that investigators, law enforcement officials, University leaders and others would properly and fully investigate any issue and proceed as the facts dictated. This didn't happen and everyone shares the responsibility."

    On NBC's TODAY show on Thursday morning, the coach's son, Jay Paterno, told host Matt Lauer that all the family has wanted is for an investigation to find the truth. "We have never ever at any time been afraid to see what people have had to say," and he called the Freeh report "one opinion, one piece of the puzzle." "We've never been afraid of the truth, so let's have the truth come out and let's go from there."

    Former college president responds
    Former Penn State President Graham Spanier has come under particular scrutiny in recent weeks amid news reports suggesting he was made aware of suspicious activity involving Sandusky in 2001 and that no report of the incident was made to authorities.

    "At no time in the more than 16 years of his presidency at Penn State was Dr. Spanier told of an incident involving Jerry Sandusky that described child abuse, sexual misconduct or criminality of any kind, and he reiterated that during his interview with Louis Freeh and his colleagues,'' Spanier's attorneys, Peter Vaira and Elizabeth Ainslie, said in a written statement.

    An "independent" investigation

    The investigation is billed by Pennsylvania State University as "independent," though the university is paying the law firm of Freeh, the former federal judge and director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

    Sandusky, 68, was found guilty of 45 counts of child sexual abuse last month and is currently in prison awaiting sentencing. He faces a maximum sentence of more than 400 years in prison.

    Jim Prisching / AP file

    How will Penn State's "independent report" affect the reputation of its much-beloved former football coach, Joe Paterno, who died after the scandal broke?

     

    Gary Cameron / Reuters file

    Former FBI Director Louis Freeh was hired in November to determine whether Penn State University officials knew about child sex abuse allegations against former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky.

    Related stories

    Matt Sandusky: From staunch defender to father's most damning accuser

    Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt empty house where his charity was born

    The Sandusky scandal led to the ouster of Spanier from the university presidency and Paterno, and charges against Timothy Curley, the athletic director who is on leave from the university, and Gary Schultz, the VP of finance and business who has since retired. The latter two are accused of perjury for their grand jury testimony and failing to properly report suspected child abuse.

    Spanier hasn't been charged. He remains a tenured professor of sociology at Penn State. He has sued the university to gain access to internal emails that his attorneys say will exonerate him.

    On Wednesday, the Paterno family released a letter written six months earlier by Paterno, saying, "This is not a football scandal."

    More from the report:

    "In critical written correspondence that we uncovered on March 20th of this year, we see evidence of their proposed plan of action in February 2001 that included reporting allegations about Sandusky to the authorities. After Mr. Curley consulted with Mr. Paterno, however, they changed the plan and decided not to make a report to the authorities. Their failure to protect the February 9, 2001 child victim, or make attempts to identify him, created a dangerous situation for other unknown, unsuspecting young boys who were lured to the Penn State campus and football games by Sandusky and victimized repeatedly by him.

    "The stated reasons by Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley for not
    taking action to identify the victim and for not reporting Sandusky to the police or Child Welfare are:

    "(1) Through counsel, Messrs. Curley and Schultz have stated that the “humane” thing to do in 2001 was to carefully and responsibly assess the best way to handle vague but troubling allegations.

    "(2) Mr. Paterno said that “I didn’t know exactly how to handle it and I was afraid to do something that might jeopardize what the university procedure was. So I backed away and turned it over to some other people, people I thought would have a little more expertise than I did. It didn’t work out that way.”

    "(3) Mr. Spanier told the Special Investigative Counsel that he was never told by anyone that the February 2001 incident in the shower involved the sexual abuse of a child but only “horsing around.” He further stated that he never asked what “horsing around” by Sandusky entailed.

    "Taking into account the available witness statements and evidence, it is more reasonable to conclude that, in order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity, the most powerful leaders at Penn State University – Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley – repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky’s child abuse from the authorities, the Board of Trustees, Penn State community, and the public at large. 

    "Although concern to treat the child abuser humanely was expressly stated, no such sentiments were ever expressed by them for Sandusky’s victims.

    "The evidence shows that these four men also knew about a 1998 criminal investigation of Sandusky relating to suspected sexual misconduct with a young boy in a Penn State football locker room shower. Again, they showed no concern about that victim. The evidence shows that Mr. Paterno was made aware of the 1998 investigation of Sandusky, followed it closely, but failed to take any action, even though Sandusky had been a key member of his coaching staff for almost 30 years, and had an office just steps away from Mr. Paterno’s. At the very least, Mr. Paterno could have alerted the entire football staff, in order to prevent Sandusky from bringing another child into the Lasch Building. Messrs. Spanier, Schultz, Paterno and Curley also failed to alert the Board of Trustees about the 1998 investigation or take any further action against Mr. Sandusky. None of them even spoke to Sandusky about his conduct. In short, nothing was done and Sandusky was allowed to continue with impunity."

    Land deal for Second Mile charity
    According to the report, Schultz met with Second Mile officials on July 24, 2001, or six months after McQueary reported seeing Sandusky abusing a boy in a Penn State locker room, and agreed to sell 40 acres of land to the organization. The land, purchased by the university in 1999, was adjacent to the home where Sandusky started the Second Mile. It would be used to build the Second Mile's $11.5 million dollar "Center For Excellence."

    In September 2001, the university's Board of Trustees approved the sale to Sandusky's charity for $168,500. 

    The report states that neither Spanier, Curley nor Schultz informed the Board of Trustees of the 1998 or 2001 investigations of Sandusky: 

    "Nothing in the board's records or interviews of Trustees indicate any contemporaneous discussions of the 2001 Sandusky incident and investigation, the propriety of a continuing relationship between Penn State and the Second Mile, or the risks created by a public association with Sandusky when the land transaction was discussed," the Freeh report says.

    "Schultz, who oversaw the transaction, did not make any disclosure of the Sandusky incident during the Board's review of the land deal. In fact, Schultz approved a press release, issued September 21, 2001, announcing the land sale in which he praised Sandusky for his work with Second Mile."

    Eight years later, according to the report, Schultz contacted a bank on behalf of Sandusky and the Second Mile, in an effort to secure financing for the Center for Excellence. In 2009 he told officials from an unnamed bank that "the Second Mile is raising funds to support an expansion of their facilities here in State College…Would you be agreeable to meet with Jerry Sandusky…and me? They are really good people and this is a great cause related to kids."

    The bank officials agreed to meet with Sandusky.

    More on this land deal is in our earlier story, Ghosts of Sandusky's dreams haunt empty home where his charity was born.

    NBC national investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff, producer Tom Winter, and investigative researchers Lisa Riordan-Seville and Hannah Rappleye contributed to this report.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Guantanamo detainee who served bin Laden returns to Sudan
    • Citizen sues US after being wrongly flagged as deportable immigrant
    • No charges for mother who abandoned severely disabled daughter at bar
    • Drop the 'i' word? Debating the term 'illegal immigrant'
    • Video: Teacher goes airborne on police pursuit

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    1204 comments

    PSU alumni and students - we need another voice on this issue, other than those who are determined to deny any accountability or responsibility for the failure to act, the failure to notify the police, and the failure to notify the child welfare organization in Pennsylvania regarding Mr. Sandusky's  …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, joe-paterno, featured, sexual-assault, louis-freeh, jerry-sandusky, commentid-featured
  • 11
    Jul
    2012
    5:21pm, EDT

    Paterno family releases coach's letter about scandal

    Jim Prisching / AP file

    Joe Paterno supposedly wrote the op-ed column in the weeks before he died of lung cancer.

    By Karen Araiza, NBCPhiladelphia.com

    Joe Paterno's family sent a letter to former Penn State football players today -- an op-ed column they say the coach, himself, wrote in the month or so before he died.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    This is the column, verbatim:

    For the last two months, at the request of the Attorney General's office, I have not discussed the specifics of my testimony regarding the pending cases. And while I will continue to honor that request, I do feel compelled to address comments made subsequent to November 9; specifically, I feel compelled to say, in no uncertain terms, that this is not a football scandal.


    Let me say that again so I am not misunderstood: regardless of anyone's opinion of my actions or the actions of the handful of administration officials in this matter, the fact is nothing alleged is an indictment of football or evidence that the spectacular collections of accomplishments by dedicated student athletes should be in anyway tarnished.

     How to Get Freeh Report

    Yet, over and over again, I have heard Penn State officials decrying the influence of football and have heard such ignorant comments like Penn State will no longer be a “football factory” and we are going to “start” focusing on integrity in athletics. These statements are simply unsupported by the five decades of evidence to the contrary - and succeed only in unfairly besmirching both a great University and the players and alumni of the football program who have given of themselves to help make it great.

    Paterno Family Statement

    For over 40 years young men have come to Penn State with the idea that they were going to do something different — they were coming to a place where they would be expected to compete at the highest levels of college football and challenged to get a degree. And they succeeded — during the last 45 years NO ONE has won more games while graduating more players. The men who made that commitment and who gave of themselves to help build the national reputation of what was once a regional school deserve better than to have their hard work and sacrifice dismissed as part of a “football factory,” all in the interests of expediency.

    Read the original report at Phildelphia's NBC10.com

    Penn State is not a football factory and it is ALREADY a great University. We have world-class researchers, degree programs, and students in every discipline. Penn Staters have been pioneers in medical advancements, engineering, and in the humanities. Our graduates have gone on to change the world — even graduates with football lettermen sweaters.

    That is why recent comments are so perplexing and damaging — Penn Staters know we are a world class University. We can recite with pride the ranks of our academic programs and the successes of our graduates. Penn Staters (and employers) know what we are and the quality of our education. Nothing that has been alleged in any way implicates that reputation; rather, it is only the inexplicable comments of our own administration doing so.

    It must stop. This is not a football scandal and should not be treated as one. It is not an academic scandal and does not in any way tarnish the hard earned and well-deserved academic reputation of Penn State. That Penn State officials would suggest otherwise is a disservice to every one of the over 500,000 living alumni.

    Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

    Forget my career in terms of my accomplishments and look at the last 40 years as I do: as the aggregate achievements of hundreds of young men working to become better people as they got an education and became better football players. Look at those men and what they have done in the world since they left Penn State and assess their contributions as an aggregate - is this a collection of jocks who did nothing but skate by at a football factory, or are these men who earned an education and built a reputation second to none as a place where academic integrity and gridiron success could thrive together?

    Whatever failings that may have happened at Penn State, whatever conclusions about my or others' conduct you may wish to draw from a fair view of the allegations, it is inarguable that these actions had nothing to do with this last team or any of the hundreds of prior graduates of the "Grand Experiment."

    Penn Staters across the globe should feel no shame in saying "We are…Penn State." This is a great University with one of the best academic performing football programs in major college athletics. Those are facts — and nothing that has been alleged changes them.

    Penn State Scandal

    This is the second preemptive strike from the Paterno family before the Freeh report is released on Thursday. The report is expected to explore whether Paterno and other PSU officials helped cover up reports that Jerry Sandusky was molesting children. Just yesterday, the Paterno family sent out a long statement, defending Paterno and reminding the public that he never really got to tell his side of the story. You can click here to that family statement in its entirety.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Guantanamo detainee who served bin Laden returns to Sudan
    • No charges for mother who abandoned severely disabled daughter at bar
    • Sister gets text: 'The girl with this phone is dead'
    • Drop the 'i' word? Debating the term 'illegal immigrant'
    • San Bernardino becomes 3rd Calif. city in 2 weeks to file for bankruptcy protection
    • Video: Teacher goes airborne on police pursuit

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    176 comments

    It is a football scandal since neither Paterno nor the administration wanted to risk the program by coming forward and outing the child predator.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: penn-state, joe-paterno, jerry-sandusky
  • 25
    May
    2012
    12:19pm, EDT

    Second Mile, charity that Jerry Sandusky founded, seeks to shut down

    By Mike Brunker, msnbc.com

    Pat Little / Reuters file

    Jerry Sandusky, the former Penn State football defensive coordinator who founded The Second Mile in 1977, allegedly met some of the young boys he sexually abused through its programs.

    The Second Mile, a charity for at-risk children founded by former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky, has filed paperwork seeking to transfer its operations to a Texas-based Christian nonprofit, saying its association with the man at the center of a child sex abuse case has undercut its support.


    Follow Mike Brunker on Twitter and Facebook.


    In a statement Friday, the State College, Pa., charity’s interim CEO, David Woodle, said that accusations that Sandusky, 68, sexually abused young boys he met through Second Mile, had damaged the charity’s ability to raise money and attract volunteers and caused referring social service agencies to rethink sending at-risk kids to its programs.


    In an interview with the Centre Daily Times, which first reported the story, Woodle called the proposed transfer “a positive step in a very negative overall situation.” 

     

     

    “Over the past several months, representatives of The Second Mile … have been in discussions with parents, school partners and donors to determine what steps should be taken after criminal charges were announced against founder Gerald Sandusky,” the statement said. The board learned that there is overwhelming support for the programs, but that there would not be adequate support, including financial, from donors, volunteers and referring social service agencies to continue The Second Mile as its own entity.” 

    The statement said Second Mile, founded by Sandusky in 1977, had petitioned the Court of Common Pleas in Centre County to allow it to transfer approximately $2 million in cash assets, an ongoing endowment and program-related non-case assets to Houston-based Arrow Child & Family Ministries to fund programs in Pennsylvania for about two years. 

    During that period, Second Mile would continue to cooperate with authorities in connection with the criminal charges against Sandusky before eventually dissolving. 

    Second Mile said its directors selected Arrow after discussions with more than 15 organizations. 

    "Our priority is to ensure children continue to be served by these programs," the statement quoted Arrow founder Mark Tennant as saying. "We were shocked and saddened by the events that led us here, but we are committed to the future of these children and their families and look forward to building on the outstanding work done by so many individuals who have been a part of The Second Mile over the years." 

    The statement indicated that it could take several months for the court to rule on its petition. 

    Sandusky has pleaded not guilty to 52 criminal counts of alleged abuse of 10 boys over 15 years, some of whom were Second Mile clients. Jury selection is scheduled to start June 5.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Police find mom of three children abandoned in Oregon
    • Second Mile, charity that Jerry Sandusky founded, seeks to shut down
    • Tsunami Harley-Davidson's next stop: US museum
    • Recording may reveal new evidence in Manson murders
    • Video: Former prep football star cleared of rape conviction

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    65 comments

    since Sandusky used his charity to groom his victims I think their assets should be forfeit, and a fund set up to handle the extensive litigation and restitution claims that are sure to follow this short eyes conviction. And since he was such a ruff tuff football guy...throw him in the sodomy wing o …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: paterno, charity, sex-abuse, crime, joe-paterno, child-abuse, sandusky, jerry-sandusky, second-mile
  • 13
    Mar
    2012
    6:32pm, EDT

    Sandusky's attorney vows to seek dismissal of child sex-abuse case

    By msnbc.com staff and news services

    A lawyer for former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky vowed to seek a dismissal of child sex abuse charges against his client after a judge on Tuesday refused to force prosecutors to provide more details on the allegations.

    Judge John Cleland rejected attorney Joe Amendola's request for more information such as exact dates of the purported molestations, details that Amendola said were crucial to building a defense against 52 counts of sexual abuse.


    Instead the judge in Pennsylvania's Centre County Court sided with prosecutors, who said they had already extracted as much information as possible from the accusers, described by prosecutor Joe McGettigan as "very troubled children" who were now adults.

    "If the victims were capable of providing detail ... we would have done so," McGettigan said.

    Several of the accusers allege in court documents the abuse occurred over several years, including one who said it began when he was 8 and lasted six years.

    "Any order directing the Commonwealth to supply details would be a futile act since the Commonwealth has explained it cannot supply the details requested," the judge wrote, using Commonwealth to refer to the state.

    In response, Amendola said he will seek a dismissal of the charges.

    Amendola told reporters on Monday he believed Sandusky's right to due process was being violated.

    Sandusky, who has maintained his innocence, is under house arrest. Jury selection in his trial is set to begin in mid-May.

    The sex abuse scandal rocked the world of college football and led to the dismissal of Penn State's legendary coach Joe Paterno and University President Graham Spanier.

    The university's Board of Trustees said both men showed a "failure of leadership" in not doing more when alerted to suspicions of child sexual abuse by Sandusky.

    In a statement on Monday, Paterno’s family blamed the Board of Trustees for not conducting a thorough investigation of the sex-abuse scandal and said they had changed their story about the reason's for Paterno’s firing.

    "The tough questions that have yet to be addressed relate not to Joe Paterno, but to the board. Two months ago, as Joe Paterno was dying, the board conducted a series of media interviews condemning him for 'moral' failures. Now they are trying a different tack and accusing him of 'leadership' failures,” the statement, quoted in the Harrisburg Patriot-News, said.

    Paterno, who was head coach at the football powerhouse for 46 years, died of lung cancer on Jan. 22.

    Reuters contributed to this report.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News

    • Study: Thousands face drinking water pollution risk
    • 15 inches of rain floods Louisiana homes, roads
    • Strip club donation saves Little League season
    • Warm weather records falling across Northeast, Midwest
    • Afghan massacre: Chain-of-command failure

    US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

    7 comments

    The guy is a menace to society. It's bad enough that he is out and about. Dismissal?!? This cretin should be off the streets and in jail!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: judge, sex-abuse, penn-state, joe-paterno, featured, jerry-sandusky
  • 14
    Jan
    2012
    7:26pm, EST

    Paterno: 'I didn't know exactly how to handle' sex abuse case

    Former Penn State football coach Joe Paterno, in an interview with The Washington Post, expresses disappointment that he didn't do more to find out what was being done about Jerry Sandusky's alleged behavior. NBC national Investigative Correspondent Michael Isikoff reports.

    178 comments

    Call the cops... that's how you handle it!!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: paterno, sex-abuse, penn-state, joe-paterno, child-abuse, sandusky, jerry-sandusky

Browse

  • featured,
  • crime,
  • weather,
  • military,
  • updated,
  • california,
  • florida,
  • environment,
  • shooting,
  • us-news,
  • new-york,
  • texas,
  • education,
  • chicago,
  • police,
  • gulf-oil-spill,
  • los-angeles,
  • kari-huus,
  • murder,
  • nbcnewyork,
  • guns,
  • new-jersey,
  • afghanistan,
  • obama,
  • colorado,
  • trayvon-martin,
  • sandy,
  • nbclosangeles,
  • barack-obama,
  • crime-and-courts,
  • politics,
  • gay,
  • fire,
  • arizona,
  • george-zimmerman,
  • veterans,
  • connecticut,
  • crime-courts
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Bill Dedman

Investigative reporter Bill Dedman of NBC News is always looking for good investigative story ideas and documents. Bill received the 1989 Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting, and has written full time for NBCNews.com since 2006.

Bill Dedman Blogroll

  • Bill's investigative reporting feed on Twitter
  • ABC News The Blotter
  • Center for Investigative Reporting
  • Center for Public Integrity
  • Center for Public Integrity's Paper Trail blog
  • Huffington Post Investigative Fund
  • Investigative Reporters and Editors' Extra! Extra!
  • McClatchey blog Nukes & Spooks
  • New York Times' City Room Records blog
  • New York Times' Open data blog
  • ProPublica
  • ProPublica blog
  • Yahoo! News The Upshot
  • TPM Muckraker
  • Washington Post Investigations
  • WhoWhatWhy forensic journalism
  • New England Center for Investigative Center at Bos
  • Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism
  • Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting
  • Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism, B
  • MinnPost.com
  • The Washington Independent
  • AU Investivative Reporting Workshop
  • Become a fan on Facebook
  • Follow on Twitter
Have an idea?
Send your ideas and documents for investigative stories.

Archives

  • 2013
    • June (266)
    • May (461)
    • April (608)
    • March (548)
    • February (510)
    • January (563)
  • 2012
    • December (457)
    • November (460)
    • October (477)
    • September (432)
    • August (525)
    • July (519)
    • June (508)
    • May (566)
    • April (538)
    • March (576)
    • February (471)
    • January (417)
  • 2011
    • December (455)
    • November (190)
    • October (9)
    • September (3)
    • August (51)
    • July (8)
    • June (3)
    • May (12)
    • April (5)
    • March (3)
    • February (1)
    • January (8)
  • 2010
    • December (5)
    • November (1)
    • October (2)
    • September (28)
    • August (40)
    • July (35)
    • June (177)
    • May (50)
    • April (9)
    • March (2)
    • February (2)
    • January (4)
  • 2009
    • December (5)
    • November (5)
    • October (2)
    • September (11)
    • August (4)
    • July (12)
    • June (1)
    • May (1)
    • April (1)
    • March (3)
    • February (3)
    • January (2)
  • 2008
    • December (3)
    • November (2)
    • October (6)
    • September (30)
    • August (26)
    • July (10)
    • June (4)
    • May (8)
    • April (13)
    • March (9)
    • February (7)
    • January (6)
  • 2007
    • December (10)
    • November (6)
    • October (22)
    • September (11)

Most Commented

  • Supreme Court strikes down Arizona law requiring proof of citizenship to vote (3942)
  • Census: White majority in U.S. gone by 2043 (1937)
  • Indiana woman on death row since she was 16 to be released (1287)
  • Six months later, Newtown families grieve, push for stricter gun-control legislation (1284)
  • Obama proposes reductions to Cold War-era nuclear arsenal (1586)
  • Mom, three teen daughters shot in Nashville; gunman still at large (1121)
  • AP report: Commander in Nazi SS-led unit living in Minnesota (767)

Other blogs

  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • US news on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise