• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Tornadoes ravage Plains states; 1 killed, 21 hurt; More severe storms likely
  • Recommended: Arizona killer Jodi Arias set to take stand in defense of her life
  • Recommended: 'Carmageddon avoided? Heavy traffic in Connecticut, but no 'parking lot'
  • Recommended: Winning ticket for huge Powerball jackpot sold in Florida

NBC News reporters bring you compelling stories from across the nation. For more US news, follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 16
    Feb
    2013
    2:18pm, EST

    First suit filed after Carnival Triumph mishap

    The lawsuit, which was filed in Miami by a passenger from Texas, accuses Carnival Cruise Lines of negligence and fraud. She claims she was "injured by unsafe, unsanitary and generally despicable conditions" while onboard. NBC's Mark Potter reports.

    By Berenice Garcia, Staff Writer, NBC News

    A Texas woman was the first passenger to file suit, hours after the Carnival Triumph cruise that left about 3,200 passengers adrift was towed into Mobile, Ala.

    Cassie Terry sought unspecified damages against Carnival Corp. in Miami federal court on Friday claiming she was "injured as a result of the unseaworthy, unsafe, unsanitary, and generally despicable conditions."

    Terry also claimed a "breach of maritime contract, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud."

    The cruise line has yet to issue a response. "We haven't yet seen the suit and are not in a position to comment," said Jennifer De La Cruz, a spokesperson for Carnival Cruise Lines.

    The cruiser was hobbled after an engine fire broke out on the ship, leaving the passengers without power or working bathrooms for five days.

    Mark Mazan, another passenger aboard the stricken ship, said he was less than satisfied with the crew.

    "It was mistake after mistake after mistake, incompetence to a point I've never seen," Mazan told NBC's TODAY.

    Not all agreed. Passenger Martha Vielhabe praised the cruise ship staff’s response to the crisis, calling them "absolutely fabulous and fantastic."

    Passengers spoke of their five-day floating nightmare after filing ashore on Friday. Some said that that the corridors of the Triumph began to reek of sewage, and said they stood on long lines to get food. Others said they sought refuge from the ship’s overheated interior by sleeping on the deck.

    Carnival Cruise Lines CEO Gerry Cahill apologized for the ordeal as passengers came ashore Friday. “We pride ourselves on providing our guests with a great vacation experience, and clearly we failed in this particular case,” he said.

    Because the ship is registered in the Bahamas and the fire occurred in international waters, the official investigation is being conducted by the Bahamian Maritime Authority with assistance from the United States Coast Guard and the National Transportation Safety Board.

    205 comments

    didnt think it would take long for the piranhas to start swimming. its a shame these people cant be happy to be alive.theyve forgotten rather quickly just how dangerous a fire at sea can be. Im a regular cruiser with royal carribean and have one planned at the end of march.a shipboard fire is my num …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: lawsuit, cruise, miami, carnival-triumph
  • 29
    Jan
    2013
    4:10am, EST

    Christian school sues ex-teachers who refused to give proof of faith

    View more videos at: http://nbclosangeles.com.

    By Gordon Tokumatsu and Frava Burgess, NBCLosAngeles.com

    A Christian school in Thousand Oaks, Calif., is suing two former teachers who threatened a lawsuit over the school's requirement to provide proof of faith.

    When the Godspeak Church bought Little Oaks Elementary in 2009, it started requiring employees to fill out questionnaires that asked whether they attended church, which church they attended and what the pastor had to say about their beliefs.

    "We do believe their personal rights were violated," said the teachers' attorney, Dawn Coulson.

    Coulson said Lynda Serrano and Mary Ellen Guevara received their questionnaires last summer. After they refused to fill out the form, they were not rehired. The teachers then filed paperwork saying they intended to sue.

    The school's attorney, Rick Kahdeman, said the church exercised its constitutional right to freedom of religion. He said that trumps any claim the teachers may have under state equal employment laws.

    "The teachers chose not to [fill out the paperwork], and they knew it was a condition of employment," Kahdeman said.

    More from NBCLosAngeles.com

    Coulson contends that California's employment laws protect her clients, in part, because the school northwest of Los Angeles was purchased by a church as a for-profit entity, not a nonprofit. She said employers can't require such questionnaires as a basis for employment, even if they are churches.

    "That would be like the church buying shares in IBM, and IBM saying, 'We can now discriminate, based on religion,'" Coulson said.

    "That issue is totally irrelevant because the rights of the school come from the First Amendment to the Constitution," Kahdeman countered.

    Kahdeman is suing the two teachers and their attorneys in federal court.

    994 comments

    These a-holes need to be taxed. Every way they want to screw someone they now call it freedom of religion BUT they are taking a political stance and defying the law, thus they should be taxed heavily.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: lawsuit, religion, california, teachers, featured, christian-school, thousand-oaks, nbclosangeles, little-oaks
  • 1
    Dec
    2012
    4:32am, EST

    Judge denies actress' request to remove anti-Islam film from YouTube

    By Reuters

    LOS ANGELES -- An actress who said she was duped into appearing in an anti-Islam film that stoked violent protests against the United States across the Muslim world lost on Friday her second legal bid to force the video off YouTube.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    Denying a request by actress Cindy Lee Garcia for a court order requiring the popular online video site to remove the crudely made 13-minute clip, a federal judge found she was unlikely to prevail on her claims of copyright infringement.

    U.S. District Judge Michael Fitzgerald of Santa Clara, California, also canceled a December 3 hearing he had previously set for oral arguments over Garcia's request.

    Garcia's lawyer, Cris Armenta, told Reuters she planned to appeal the decision.

    Actress sues, says she was fooled into acting in anti-Muslim movie

    The lawsuit, filed in September, names YouTube and its parent company Google Inc as defendants, along with the film's producer.

    A previous motion by Garcia for a temporary restraining order against YouTube's continued posting of the video was rejected by a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge.

    Garcia's case was the first known civil litigation stemming from the video, billed as a film trailer, which depicts the Prophet Mohammad as a fool and a sexual deviant. The clip sparked a torrent of anti-American unrest in Egypt, Libya and dozens of other Muslim countries.

    A judge denied bail for the alleged producer of an anti-Muslim film that sparked Mideast outrage. He was arrested for violating probation from a bank fraud conviction. KNBC's Beverly White reports.

    The outbreak of violence coincided with an attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi in September that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya.

    For many Muslims, any depiction of the prophet is considered blasphemous.

    Google has refused to remove the film from YouTube, despite pressure from the White House and others to take it down, though the company has blocked the trailer in Egypt, Libya and other Muslim countries.

    Copyright claim
    Garcia has accused the purported filmmaker of fraud, libel and unfair business practices.

    But her federal lawsuit also asserts a copyright claim to her performance in the video, titled "The Innocence of Muslims," and accuses Google of infringing on that copyright by distributing the video without her approval via YouTube.

    US-based anti-Islam filmmaker, 6 others sentenced to death by Egypt court

    But in a three-page ruling, the judge questioned the validity of such a claim. He held that even if she could prove a legitimate copyright interest in her film performance, she effectively relinquished her rights to producers of the film.

    Fitzgerald also ruled that Garcia failed to show that she would suffer irreparable harm without an injunction.

    Slideshow: Anger over film spreads throughout Muslim world

    Protests ignited by a controversial film that ridicules Islam's Prophet Muhammad spread throughout Muslim world.

    Launch slideshow

    Garcia's lawsuit identifies Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, an Egyptian-born Coptic Christian living in the Los Angeles area, as the film's producer. His legal name has since been established to be Mark Basseley Youssef and he served time in federal prison for bank fraud.

    According to the lawsuit, Youssef operated under the assumed name of Sam Bacile when he misled Garcia and other performers into appearing in an anti-Muslim film they believed was to be an adventure drama called "Desert Warrior." She claims to have since received death threats.

    Man behind 'Innocence of Muslims' film sentenced to one year in prison for violating probation

    "We hope that worldwide the message has been heard that Ms. Garcia was not complicit and did not voluntarily participate in this heinous piece of hate speech," Garcia's lawyer said in a statement, despite Friday's ruling against her.

    Youssef was sent back to jail for a year on November 7 for probation violations stemming from his role in making the video, including his use of an alias in connection with the film.

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • 66 species of coral proposed for protection by US
    • College students witness murder suicide in class
    • Wikileaks case: Manning asked why he didn't complain earlier
    • Missouri Powerball jackpot winners revealed: 'We’re still stunned by what’s happened'
    • Mystery man claims winning Powerball ticket ... in Maryland?
    • Harvard latest college to accept BDSM club

    Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

    244 comments

    I thought it was funny as hell and it should have been done by the Saturday night live crew!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: film, lawsuit, court, youtube, featured, anti-muslim, anti-islam, innocence-of-muslims, cindy-lee-garcia
  • 2
    Nov
    2012
    4:19pm, EDT

    Woman sues Texas police department over ruptured breast implant

     

    View more videos at: http://nbcdfw.com.

    By Mola Lenghi, NBCDFW.com

    A North Texas woman who says a Pantego police officer caused her breast implant to rupture during an arrest is suing the department.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    Rebecca Van Hooser of Arlington, Texas,  said the officer threw her against her car on Oct. 28, 2011, when he arrested her during a traffic stop.

    The Pantego officer pulled her over on a headlight violation and arrested her after learning she had a warrant for an unpaid speeding ticket.


    "She gets out of the car, (the officer) grabs her, throws her against the car, spreads her legs ... and grabs her arms and forcefully pulls them out and yanks them very hard behind her back," said her attorney, Susan Hutchison.

    See the original story at NBCDFW.com | More from NBCDFW.com

    Hutchison said throwing Van Hooser against the car caused her breast implant to burst.

    "She's screaming in pain, and his response is, 'This isn't supposed to be comfortable,'" Hutchison said.

    Van Hooser spent the night in jail.

    Watch US News crime videos on NBCNews.com 

    Her attorney said the rupture has led to health problems.

    "She's had a number of surgeries," Hutchison said. "She had two hematomas as a result, and she's going to have to have a partial mastectomy, tissue transplant and a new implant."

    Hutchison said the lawsuit is not just about her client's medical problems.

    "We respect police officers," she said. "We're glad they're out there protecting us. When you arm someone with a gun and a badge and the authority that they have over people, you've got to train them appropriately, and they have got to be able to react reasonably and responsibly."

    Pantego officials said the town has complete faith in its police force. The town said its officers always conduct themselves in the most professional manner.

    Hutchison said the damages Van Hooser will seek have not yet been determined.

    Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

    855 comments

    The officer was the real boob in this story. Seriously what a jerk.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: texas, lawsuit, breast-implant, nbcdfw
  • 24
    Oct
    2012
    12:49pm, EDT

    U.S. sues BofA over alleged mortgage fraud

    The U.S. is suing Bank of America on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, with CNBC's Scott Cohn.

    By Reuters

    UPDATED 2:11 p.m. ET: The United States filed a civil mortgage fraud lawsuit against Bank of America, accusing it of selling thousands of toxic home loans to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that went into default and caused more than $1 billion of losses.

    Wednesday's case, originally brought by a whistleblower, is the U.S. Department of Justice's first civil fraud lawsuit over mortgage loans sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

    It also compounds the problems that the Bank of America, second-largest U.S. bank, has faced since its disastrous 2008 purchase of Countrywide Financial Corp, once the nation's largest mortgage lender.

    According to a complaint filed in Manhattan federal court, Countrywide in 2007 invented a scheme known as the "Hustle" designed to speed up processing of residential home loans.

    Operating under the motto "Loans Move Forward, Never Backward," mortgage executives tried to eliminate "toll gates" designed to ensure that loans were sound and not tainted by fraud, the government said.

    This resulted in "defect rates" that were roughly nine times the industry norm, but Countrywide concealed this from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and even awarded bonuses to staff to "rebut" the problems being discovered, it added. The scheme ran through 2009 and caused "countless" foreclosures, it added.

    "The fraudulent conduct alleged in today's complaint was spectacularly brazen in scope," U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan said in a statement. "This lawsuit should send another clear message that reckless lending practices will not be tolerated."

    Bank of America did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Since paying $2.5 billion for Countrywide on July 1, 2008, the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank has lost nearly $40 billion on mortgage litigation and requests by investors to buy back soured loans, Credit Suisse estimated on October 5.

    Some of these costs related to Merrill Lynch & Co, which Bank of America bought at the beginning of 2009.

    According to court records, the case had been filed under seal in February by Edward O'Donnell, a Pennsylvania resident and former executive vice president at Countrywide Home Loans who had worked there between 2003 and 2009.

    The United States later joined the case. It seeks triple damages under the federal False Claims Act, as well as civil penalties.

    It is unclear whether O'Donnell has hired a lawyer. O'Donnell could not immediately be reached for comment.

    Federal regulators seized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on September 7, 2008 and put them into a conservatorship.

    Bharara's office has in the last 1-1/2 years brought five civil fraud lawsuits against other lenders under the False Claims Act over alleged reckless residential mortgage lending, involving loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration.

    In February, Citigroup Inc settled its case for $158.3 million and Flagstar Bancorp Inc settled for $132.8 million, while Deutsche Bank AG settled in May for $202.3 million. Cases are pending against Wells Fargo & Co and Allied Home Mortgage Corp, Bharara said.

    On Monday, Congressman Barney Frank, who chaired the House Financial Services Committee in 2008, said Bank of America should probably be shielded from government lawsuits over Merrill, which it bought in part at federal officials' urging, but he said he knew of no such urging to buy Countrywide.

    Bank of America shares were up 2 cents at $9.38 in afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

    The case is U.S. ex rel. O'Donnell v. Bank of America Corp et al, U.S, District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 12-01422.

    More business news:

    • 10 US companies hiring the most right now
    • Savings tips for those living paycheck to paycheck
    • Treat or trick? Halloween costumes at work
    • Video; ‘We have zero savings’: Family’s familiar struggle
    • Sign up for our Business newsletter

    Follow NBCNews.com business on Twitter and Facebook

     

    409 comments

    Civil charges. I don't care. Criminal charges, that's what we need, especially for Angelo 'Orange Man' Mozillo.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: lawsuit, bank-of-america, real-estate, featured, mortgage-fraud
  • 5
    Oct
    2012
    2:36pm, EDT

    Bachelor sues club after stripper's rough pole dance bursts his bladder

    By NBC News staff

    A Pennsylvania man is suing a strip club after a rough pole dance ruptured his bladder during his bachelor party.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    A lawsuit filed last week says that in late November 2010 Patrick Gallagher, a resident of Lansdale, Pa., had been invited to lie on the stage at the Penthouse Club in Port Richmond, Pa., as part of its “Bachelor’s Package.”

    That’s when one dancer shimmied up the pole, and “from a great height, she launched herself down onto his abdomen” with such force that she ruptured his bladder, Gallagher’s attorney Neil Murray told the Philadelphia Daily News.  


    Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

    The suit said the move resulted in severe pain for Gallagher that did not subside by the next morning. He went to the emergency room, and doctors discovered he had internal bleeding and a ruptured bladder that required surgery to correct.

    Murray said that Gallagher also suffered nerve damage in his back and hip, the Daily News reported.

    The lawsuit accuses the club of negligence and seeks at least $50,000 for medical costs, pain, humiliation and mental anguish.

    Watch the most-viewed videos on NBCNews.com 

    Gallagher’s lawsuit is one of several filed in recent years against the club, according to court records. The other lawsuits allege a beating by bouncers, a slip-and-fall injury, overserving of alcohol and the unauthorized use of a woman’s photographs in club advertisements.

    Seven dancers and a manager at the club were also arrested last November on prostitution charges. 

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • 2,000 gone in Afghanistan: Did you notice the death of Sgt. Riley Stephens?
    • Teen calls 911 to report mother, sister dead: 'I hate the feeling of killing someone'
    • LAPD chief: We'll stop holding some undocumented immigrants for feds
    • Up for grabs: the $300 million estate of reclusive heiress Huguette Clark
    • Gray wolves probably real target of poisoned meat that killed dog
    • Video: Could Border Patrol agent's death have been friendly fire?

    Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    136 comments

    Well, it looks like the Stripper took the concept of "Break Dancing" to a whole new level!

    Show more
    Explore related topics: pennsylvania, lawsuit, strip-club, stripper, weird-news
  • 28
    Sep
    2012
    1:11pm, EDT

    Class-action suit against FEMA trailer manufacturers settled for $42.6 million

    David Friedman / NBC News

    File photo shows a FEMA trailer park near Highway 90 in Bay St. Louis, Miss., in 2007.

    By Mike Brunker, NBC News

    More than six years after Gulf Coast victims of Hurricane Katrina began experiencing adverse health effects while living in travel trailers provided by the federal government for temporary housing, a federal judge in New Orleans has given his final approval to a $42.6 million settlement of a class-action lawsuit alleging that the units emitted hazardous levels of the toxic chemical formaldehyde.

    U.S. District Judge Kurt Engelhardt approved the deal Thursday after hearing from attorneys who brokered the agreement between the plaintiffs and more than two dozen manufacturers of mobile homes provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.


    Follow Open Channel on Twitter and Facebook.


    Roughly 55,000 residents of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Texas will be eligible for shares of $37.5 million paid by more than two dozen manufacturers, the Associated Press reported. They also can get shares of a separate $5.1 million settlement with FEMA contractors that installed and maintained the units.


    Dan Balhoff, a court-appointed special master, will determine the plaintiffs' awards, the AP said. Up to 48 percent of the total settlement money – or approximately $20,5 million -- will be deducted for attorneys' fees and costs, it said. Assuming the remainder is divided equally among 55,000 plaintiffs, the plaintiffs would receive about $4,020 apiece.

    Payments are expected to go out late this year or early next year, the AP said.

    Engelhardt presided over three trials for claims against FEMA trailer manufacturers and installers after he was picked in 2007 to oversee hundreds of consolidated lawsuits. The juries in all three trials sided with the companies and didn't award any damages.

    As msnbc.com (now NBCNews.com) first reported in July 2006, residents of the trailers began complaining of headaches, nosebleeds and breathing difficulty shortly after moving into the trailers, which were trucked to the Gulf Coast by the tens of thousands after Katrina and Rita devastated the area in rapid succession in 2005.

    Air quality tests of 44 FEMA trailers in early 2006 conducted by the Sierra Club found formaldehyde concentrations as high as 0.34 parts per million – a level nearly equal to what a professional embalmer would be exposed to on the job, according to one study of the chemical’s workplace effects.

    And government tests on hundreds of trailers in Louisiana and Mississippi announced in 2008 found formaldehyde levels that were, on average, about five times what people are exposed to in most modern homes. 

    FEMA, which isn't a party to the settlements, had long downplayed the health risks from formaldehyde exposure before those test results were announced.

    It eventually began auctioning off the units as “scrap” — meaning they should not be used for human habitation — in October 2008, but some unscrupulous buyers apparently were able to dodge regulations and return them to the housing pool. 

    Formaldehyde gas -- the airborne form of a chemical used in a wide variety of products, including composite wood and plywood panels in the travel trailers that FEMA purchased to house hurricane victims -- is considered a human carcinogen, or cancer-causing substance, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and a probable human carcinogen by the EPA.

    Gerald Meunier, a lead plaintiffs' attorney, told the AP that the deal provides residents with "somewhat modest" compensation but allows both sides to avoid the expense and risks of protracted litigation.

    "Dollar amounts alone do not determine whether a settlement is fair and reasonable," he said.

    Jim Percy, a lawyer for the trailer makers, said Engelhardt would have had to try cases individually or transfer suits to other jurisdictions if the settlement wasn't reached.

    "It was not going to end quickly, and it was going to be even more monumental for all the parties concerned," he said.

    But that doesn't mean the deal isn't a disappointment for many residents who blame their illnesses on the cramped trailers they occupied for months on end.

    "We were told not to look for much," said Anthony Dixon, a New Orleans resident who says he developed asthma while living in a FEMA trailer for two years.

    Dixon, 58, attended the hearing with his wife and mother to learn more about the deal.

    "We're glad to get it over with," he added.

    Engelhardt noted he received a letter from a woman whose 66-year-old mother, Agnes Mauldin, of Mississippi, died of leukemia in 2008 after living in a FEMA trailer. Mauldin's daughter, Lydia Greenlees, said the settlement offers "very little" for what her family considers to be a wrongful death case.

    "I am saddened about the settlement in that I feel like it makes a mockery of my mother's life," Greenlees wrote. "I don't want anyone to think for one second that I view this settlement as a fair trade for my mother's life. I do not."

    A group of companies that includes Gulf Stream Coach Inc., Forest River Inc., Vanguard LLC and Monaco Coach Corp. will pay $20 million of the $37.5 million settlement with the trailer makers.

    Shaw Environmental Inc., Bechtel Corp., Fluor Enterprises Inc. and CH2M Hill Constructors Inc. are among the FEMA contractors that agreed to pay shares of the separate $5.1 million settlement.

    Only a handful of formaldehyde-related claims are still pending, including some against FEMA by a group of Texas residents.

    Mike Brunker is the projects editor for NBCNews.com; the Associated Press contributed to this article.

    More from Open Channel:

    • RNC cuts ties with firm over voter registration allegations
    • Big GOP donor among 2 indicted in Dominican resort scam
    • Black youths exposed to more alcohol advertising, study finds
    • Judge rejects ex-Penn State officials' bid to dismiss perjury charges
    • How prosecutorial turf wars complicated money-laundering probe of bank
    • Blind sheik terrorist will stay in US prison, White House says
    • The real vote-fraud opportunity has arrived: casting your ballot by mail
    • Solar panel startup to get $197 million from Uncle Sam
    • Washington Post debunks claim that Obama skips security briefings
    • Trillion-gallon loophole: lax rules for drillers who inject pollutants into Earth

      Follow Open Channel from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

     

    236 comments

    Here's a dam and levee system to protect you, oh wait, here comes the cavalry to rescue you, oh wait, here's a trailer to live in, oh wait, here's $46.2 million, oh wait, you don't get sh*t. Go away now. What a monumental cluster F#*k

    Show more
    Explore related topics: fema, lawsuit, health, featured, travel-trailers, formaldehyde
  • 28
    Sep
    2012
    2:46pm, EDT

    Lawsuit: Pentagon denied rape victims their constitutional rights

    By Jeff Black, Staff Writer, NBC News

    Nineteen veterans and active-duty service members from the Army and Air Force allege in a new lawsuit filed Friday that they were sexually assaulted while in the military and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and other leaders denied them their constitutional rights of due process after reporting the crimes.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    The suit seeks monetary damages, though no precise figure was named. It is the fifth lawsuit of its kind filed by Susan Burke, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney.


    The 15 women and four men named in the suit were all retaliated against after reporting rapes and were denied the right to have their cases heard by an impartial party, Burke said. In the military, senior commanders are in charge of determining whether reported sexual assaults will be referred to military courts.

    Related: Victims of sexual assault in military say brass often ignore pleas for justice

    “Anyone who has looked closely at these types of cases knows that we have a disgraceful system,” Burke told NBC News. “It is controlled by the chain of command. These rape survivors were all denied entry into a court system, and they were retaliated against.”

    While each case has different facts on the time and place of the assault, they demonstrate a pattern of a systematic failure of leadership and oversight, Burke said, explaining why Panetta is named in the suit.

    The lawsuit filed Friday comes on the heels of a rare case of an Army general being charged with sexual assault and a scandal at Lackland Air Base in San Antonio, Texas, in which at least in which at least a dozen military instructors are accused of sexually assaulting young female recruits.

    Related: Army general accused of sex misconduct

    Army Brig. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sinclair, who has served 27 years, including tours of Afghanistan and Iraq, on Wednesday was charged with forced sex on a subordinate and other offenses. He was relieved of his duty in May and recalled to Fort Bragg, N.C., where the charges were referred to military investigators.

    Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., joined a news conference in San Francisco announcing the new lawsuit.

    Watch US News videos on NBCNews.com 

    In November 2011, Speier introduced legislation in Congress to reform the military justice system and the way it handles cases of rape and sexual assault. H.R. 3435, the Sexual Assault Training and Oversight Prevention Act (STOP Act), would create an impartial office made up of civilian and military experts within the military to review cases of rape and sexual assault. The bill has 133 bipartisan cosponsors.

    For his part, Panetta has moved to change how sexual assaults are reported and dealt with inside the armed forces. In April, he issued new policies requiring that more senior commanders handle sexual assault complaints. And on Tuesday he ordered all military branches to improve the quality of sexual assault prevention and training.

    However, Burke, and activists claim those moves fall short.

    "This has been going on for years," Burke said. "Clearly, keeping these cases inside the military system isn't working."   

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Summer's over, but drought persists; two-thirds of contiguous US affected
    • Lucky 13 brings $202 million for Powerball ticket sold in Iowa
    • Authorities hunting for 73-year-old accused of killing his daughter-in-law
    • Video: Helmet camera captures soldier shot in firefight
    • No fix for 'Jesus rifles' deploying to Afghanistan

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    101 comments

    I really hope they bring the change that is so dearly needed when handling rape in the military. It is a broken system, and it is a total disgrace how they currently handle attacks on fellow service women and men. These commanders should be ashamed, and drummed out of the military. I hope the women  …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: lawsuit, pentagon, military, rape, san-francisco, sexual-assault, leon-panetta, susan-burke
  • 28
    Sep
    2012
    1:01pm, EDT

    US immigration chief: Same-sex ties are family ties

    By Miranda Leitsinger, Staff Writer, NBC News

    Same-sex couples will be considered “family relationships” in immigration proceedings, according to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, a move that could help stem the deportation of those in gay or lesbian binational relationships.

    Follow @mimileitsinger

    Close family ties to the United States are a factor considered by authorities in deportation cases, and gay and lesbian advocates have long argued for same-sex couples to have the same immigration rights as opposite-sex couples.

    “In an effort to make clear the definition of the phrase ‘family relationships,’ I have directed ICE to disseminate written guidance to the field that the interpretation of the phrase ‘family relationships’ includes long-term, same-sex partners,” Napolitano said in a letter.

    Eight-four members of Congress signed a joint letter to Napolitano on July 31 asking for her to put into writing an order to prevent the deportation and separation of immigrants from their American citizen same-sex partners.

     One of those who penned the letter, U.S. Congressman Michael Honda of California, said Napolitano’s response, which he received Thursday night, heralded “promising news.”

    “In the wake of this important victory, we must take a step forward and continue the fight for immigration reform. Current immigration laws are tearing families apart and separating American citizens from their loves ones,” he said in a statement. “No one should have to choose between their spouse and their country, and no family should be left out of the immigration system.”

    Gay couples, where spouse is a foreigner, sue over DOMA
    Same-sex couple fights to stop deportation, gay marriage ban
    For some gay couples, fight goes on to marry — and stay in the US

    There are an estimated 36,000 binational gay couples in the U.S. Two such couples have brought lawsuits challenging the Defense of Marriage Act, a U.S. law passed in 1996 that bars federal recognition of same-sex marriages and thereby denies various benefits given to heterosexual couples, such as the right to immigrate.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    Rachel B. Tiven, executive director of Immigration Equality, called the announcement a “huge step forward.”

    “Until now, LGBT families and their lawyers had nothing to rely on but an oral promise that prosecutorial discretion would include all families. Today, DHS has responded to Congress and made that promise real. The Administration’s written guidance will help families facing separation and the field officers who are reviewing their cases,” she said in a statement.

    Tiven was referring to the prosecutorial discretion laid out in June 2011, when ICE Director John Morton issued a memo requiring staff  to consider the circumstances presented in individual deportation cases, such as whether the person has close family ties to the U.S.

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Michigan police dig into driveway in latest search for Teamster boss Jimmy Hoffa
    • Six teenage girls beat Pennsylvania woman, videotape attack
    • Video: Pilot proposes during emergency stunt
    • Chef who admitted slow-cooking wife's body convicted of murder
    • Cops: Man kills suspected burglar, then learns it's his teen son

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    640 comments

    I predict a rational debate below me.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: of, security, lawsuit, marriage, gay, family, lesbian, homeland, department, ties, couples, same-sex, deportations, napolitano, doma
  • 22
    Sep
    2012
    3:57am, EDT

    Court: Illinois can't force pharmacists to give 'morning after' pill

    By Mary Wisniewski, Reuters

    CHICAGO - An Illinois appellate court Friday affirmed a lower court finding that the state cannot force pharmacies and pharmacists to sell emergency contraceptives - also known as "morning after" pills - if they have religious objections.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    In 2005, former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich mandated that all pharmacists and pharmacies sell "Plan B," the brand name for a drug designed to prevent pregnancy following unprotected sex or a known or suspected contraceptive failure if taken within 72 hours.

    Some anti-abortion advocates object to the drugs, which work by preventing the release of an egg, preventing fertilization or stopping a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus.

    College vending machine dispenses 'morning after' pill

    In 2011, an Illinois judge entered an injunction against the rule, finding no evidence that the drugs had ever been denied on religious grounds, and that the law was not neutral since it was designed to target religious objectors.

    The Illinois appellate court agreed that the Illinois Health Care Right of Conscience Act protects pharmacists' decision not to dispense the contraceptives due to their beliefs.

    Free birth control under health law begins

    "This decision is a great victory for religious freedom," said Mark Rienzi, senior counsel for the Becket Fund, quoted in a statement about the decision.

    President Obama's health care reform is drawing fire from Republicans, as provisions enacted today mandate all employers provide free contraception to their employees. NBC's Brian Mooar reports.

    Earlier this year, a federal court in Washington struck down a similar state rule, according to the Becket Fund, a non-profit law firm.

    The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois, which had filed an amicus brief on behalf of the state, expressed dismay at the court's decision.

    Long-term contraceptives, like IUDs, gaining popularity

    "We are dismayed that the court expressly refused to consider the interests of women who are seeking lawful prescription medication and essentially held that the religious practice of individuals trumps women's health care," said ACLU spokesman Ed Yohnka. "We think the court could not be more wrong."

    A spokesperson for Illinois Governor Pat Quinn was not immediately available for comment.

    Read more health news on NBC's Vitals

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • For first time, gay marriage may win statewide vote
    • Three Aurora shooting victims suing Cinemark' theater to reopen in 2013
    • From sports shoes to bomb shields: the odd detour of a key US military material
    • Pennsylvania couple charged with selling neighbor's dog on Craigslist
    • Video: Cops, 'yarn bombers' team up to protect art
    • Empty chair 'lynchings': Anti-Obama protests gone too far?

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

    876 comments

    Hmmmm...........not sure how I feel personally about the "Plan B" pill - but I don't think pharmacists should be the one to decide if it should be available in their stores based on their personal opinion or religious beliefs.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: abortion, lawsuit, health, illinois, religion, contraceptive, plan-b, pharmacist, birth-control, morning-after-pill, aclu, featured, crime-and-courts, commentid-aclu
  • 4
    Sep
    2012
    3:26pm, EDT

    Dynasty Young, gay teen expelled for firing stun gun at school, sues Indianapolis district

    Chelisa Grimes

    Undated 2012 photo of Darnell "Dynasty" Young with his mother, Chelisa Grimes.

    By James Eng, NBC News

    An openly gay Indianapolis teenager who was expelled after firing a stun gun at school to scare away what he said were bullies is suing the school district, accusing it of failing to stop “relentless, severe harassment” by other students.

    A lawsuit filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis on behalf of Darnell “Dynasty” Young, 17, claims teachers and staff at Arsenal Technical High School ignored his repeated pleas to protect him from ongoing abuse on school grounds.


    From the day he arrived at Tech, Plaintiff Dynasty Young was subjected to relentless, severe harassment and abuse by other students because he was perceived as gay and because his clothing, behavior, and demeanor did not fit stereotypical notions of masculinity.  He repeatedly reported the abuse to school staff.  Rather than take effective measures to protect him, school staff told him that he was to blame for the harassment because of his appearance and told him to change his dress and behavior to conform to stereotypical ideas of masculinity and to be less “flamboyant.”

    The Indianapolis School District said its attorneys will review the lawsuit “and respond accordingly.” It said in a statement:

    "We are pleased that last week, the Indianapolis Marion County Equal Opportunity agency dismissed its complaint against Indianapolis Public Schools (IPS) in the matter of former Arsenal Technical High school student Darnell Young. The agency concluded that IPS provided a sufficient response to the Complaint (it filed on Young’s behalf) and that no further action was appropriate.”

    Young often wore some of his mother’s clothes to school, including knee-high boots, purses, rings and bangles. These accessories were permitted under the school’s dress code, the lawsuit says.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    Young says fellow students spat at him, called him derogatory names and threw rocks and empty bottles at him because of the way he dressed and what they perceived as unmasculine behavior.

    Young’s mother, Chelisa Grimes, says she eventually gave her son a stun gun to protect himself because she feared for his life.

    Read the court complaint (PDF)

    On April 16, according to the lawsuit, Young was accosted by six male students between classes who yelled at him and threatened to attack him. He fired the stun gun into the air, scaring off the group.

    Not long after Dynasty sat down for his next class, a school security officer came into the classroom, cuffed him and escorted him out. The officer remarked, “If you did not dress like this, people would not mess with you,” the lawsuit says.

    Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

    Young was expelled for a full school year. The school district later reduced the expulsion, but on the condition that Young transfer to an alternative high school.

    Young declined and eventually enrolled at Indianapolis Metropolitan High School, a charter school not affiliated with Indianapolis Public Schools, where he is taking extra classes in an effort to try graduate on schedule in 2013.

    “I want to make sure no other student in the Indianapolis Public Schools ever has to go through the kind of abuse that I went through. I am hoping this will get IPS to start treating kids like me with respect and really do something to protect their students,” Young said in a press release issued by the National Center for Lesbian Rights. The center and the law firms of Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Waples & Hanger filed the lawsuit.

    “My son is a wonderful, sweet, talented young man,” added Grimes. “He deserves a chance to attend school and learn without being terrorized by other students and told that the school will not protect him unless he changes who he is.”

    The lawsuit claims violations of federal civil and constitutional rights. It seeks unspecified damages and a reversal of Young’s expulsion.

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Thousands of dead nutria pile up on Mississippi beaches after Isaac
    • Fire in California's San Gabriel Mountains burns for third day
    • Man survives 4 days in Utah tunnel with broken leg
    • Isaac's remnants bring torrential rain to East Coast
    • Missing Fla. tycoon reportedly left watch, ring at home
    • Video: WWII veteran, 92, kills burglar with single gunshot

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    983 comments

    Just because you're on the YMCA team does not give you the Right to take a weapon to SCHOOL>>>PERIOD> YOU SHOULD BE IN A Juvenile detention center right now.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: lawsuit, gay, education, featured, indiapolis, dynasty-young
  • 31
    Aug
    2012
    4:59am, EDT

    Judge strikes down NYC law meant to keep X-rated shops away from schools

    Spencer Platt / Getty Images, file

    Pedestrians pass an adult store in Times Square in New York City. The state's supreme court on Thursday deemed that a set of amendments in 2001 meant to tighten the city's regulation of strip clubs, topless bars and adult video and book stores violated the constitutional protections of free speech and were unnecessary.

    By NBC News staff and wire reports

    NEW YORK -- A New York City zoning law designed to keep adult entertainment businesses away from schools, churches and residential neighborhoods was deemed unconstitutional by a New York state judge on Thursday.

    Justice Louis York of the New York State Supreme Court in Manhattan said a set of amendments in 2001 meant to tighten the city's regulation of strip clubs, topless bars and adult video and book stores violated the constitutional protections of free speech and were unnecessary.


    York said adult establishments today differ from their predecessors by having less garish signage and by segregating their erotica from more mainstream parts of their business, making them less conspicuous to the public.

    "These entities no longer operate in an atmosphere placing more dominance of sexual matters over non-sexual ones," York said, ruling on two lawsuits lodged by a group of adult businesses against the city.

    Thursday's ruling will have the biggest effect on the dozens of bars, restaurants, book and video stores that offer adult entertainment alongside non-X-rated services.

    According to The New York Times, the original 1995 city law defined an "adult establishment" as any business where more than 40 percent of its material was sexually oriented in nature.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    The 1995 law helped break up clusters of sexually themed businesses and scatter them to New York City's industrial areas, the Times said. As a result, many city neighborhoods were remade and gentrified, according to the paper.

    But by the end of the decade, city authorities believed that many of these outlets, often referred to as "60-40 establishments," merely kept a few shelves of non-X-rated material on their premises in order to mask the true nature of their business, according to the Times.

    The 2001 amendments defined many such establishments as "adult enterprises" and barred them from operating closer than 500 feet from other sexually oriented venues, or from schools, places of worship and homes.

    Current city guidelines allow venues where less than 40 percent of space or inventory is devoted to sexually explicit activities to operate anywhere in the city.

    Full US news coverage on NBCNews.com

    Studies don't link crime rates and strip clubs, judge says
    York noted that studies presented to the court concluded that the presence of adult establishments did not increase crime rates or lower property value, as previously believed.

    "Accordingly there is no need for the 2001 amendments ... they are a violation of free-speech provisions of the U.S. and state constitutions," he said.

    Martin P. Mehler, a lawyer for several topless clubs in the case, told the Times that the city's defense of the 2001 amendments failed because the original rule had worked.

    Stay informed with the latest headlines; sign up for our newsletter

    "We have adhered to what the law was," Mehler told the Times.

    "It has accomplished its goal of doing away with that tawdry atmosphere that used to exist in Times Square, and there was no need to take away a basic First Amendment right," the newspaper quoted him as saying.

    The ruling was a loss for city officials who have sought to crack down on what they call "sham compliance" by venues that employ methods such as piling stacks of children's videos on the floor in order to ostensibly devote 60 percent of their inventory to non-adult material.

    Tampa strip-club king: RNC not great for business

    Robin Binder, deputy chief of the administrative law division of the City Law Department, said her agency would appeal the decision.

    "The city's ability to regulate adult establishments is critical to preserving neighborhood quality of life," Binder said in a statement.

    'That's just un-American'
    Others called the ruling a triumph for freedom.

    "It's wrong for a city or a state to say, 'We're banning this type of literature, and we're not going to allow you to read or see it,' " Herald Price Fahringer, an attorney for video stores represented in the lawsuits, told the Times.

    "That's just un-American," the newspaper quoted him as saying.

    Reuters contributed to this report.

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Ex-Navy SEAL: Book on bin Laden raid about 9/11, not politics
    • Tough-minded judge assigned to take over George Zimmerman case
    • One of most dangerous cities in US plans to ditch police force
    • Ex-Marine Angela Madsen on her journey from homelessness to the Paralympics
    • Dam collapse feared due to Isaac; thousands flee

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    121 comments

    This idiot based his judgement on how these establishments look on the outside! He must be a pervert himself if he believes that "less garish" signage means these businesses should be more deeply embedded in our communities. I think he just earned himself a lifetime free admission.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: lawsuit, schools, new-york-city, manhattan, featured, adult-entertainment, unconstitutional, strip-clubs, crime-and-courts
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • crime,
  • military,
  • weather,
  • california,
  • updated,
  • florida,
  • environment,
  • us-news,
  • new-york,
  • shooting,
  • texas,
  • education,
  • chicago,
  • police,
  • gulf-oil-spill,
  • kari-huus,
  • nbcnewyork,
  • los-angeles,
  • murder,
  • new-jersey,
  • guns,
  • afghanistan,
  • obama,
  • colorado,
  • sandy,
  • nbclosangeles,
  • trayvon-martin,
  • barack-obama,
  • crime-and-courts,
  • politics,
  • gay,
  • veterans,
  • connecticut,
  • fire,
  • religion,
  • boston-marathon-tragedy,
  • crime-courts,
  • snow
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Jeff Black, Staff Writer

I'm a senior writer and editor working on the news team.

Miranda Leitsinger

James Eng

Senior editor at NBC News

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (288)
    • April (608)
    • March (548)
    • February (510)
    • January (563)
  • 2012
    • December (457)
    • November (460)
    • October (477)
    • September (432)
    • August (525)
    • July (519)
    • June (508)
    • May (566)
    • April (538)
    • March (576)
    • February (471)
    • January (417)
  • 2011
    • December (455)
    • November (190)
    • October (9)
    • September (3)
    • August (51)
    • July (8)
    • June (3)
    • May (12)
    • April (5)
    • March (3)
    • February (1)
    • January (8)
  • 2010
    • December (5)
    • November (1)
    • October (2)
    • September (28)
    • August (40)
    • July (35)
    • June (177)
    • May (50)
    • April (9)
    • March (2)
    • February (2)
    • January (4)
  • 2009
    • December (5)
    • November (5)
    • October (2)
    • September (11)
    • August (4)
    • July (12)
    • June (1)
    • May (1)
    • April (1)
    • March (3)
    • February (3)
    • January (2)
  • 2008
    • December (3)
    • November (2)
    • October (6)
    • September (30)
    • August (26)
    • July (10)
    • June (4)
    • May (8)
    • April (13)
    • March (9)
    • February (7)
    • January (6)
  • 2007
    • December (10)
    • November (6)
    • October (22)
    • September (11)

Most Commented

  • Obama calls IRS flap 'inexcusable,' announces resignation of acting IRS chief (3698)
  • NTSB recommends lowering blood alcohol level that constitutes drunken driving (1580)
  • Benghazi, IRS, AP: A guide to the 3 storms confronting the White House (2527)
  • Fired lesbian teacher: Catholic educators union won't back me (2031)
  • 5 unanswered questions about the IRS targeting of conservative groups (1963)
  • Abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell convicted of first-degree murder (1648)
  • Majority of Colorado sheriffs file suit against new gun laws (1938)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • US news on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise