• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Chaos and courage as tornado wrecks elementary schools
  • Recommended: More storms on the way, tornadoes possible across swath of US
  • Recommended: More rough weather blanketed country on Tuesday
  • Recommended: Search and rescue winds down a day after deadly Oklahoma tornado

NBC News reporters bring you compelling stories from across the nation. For more US news, follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 28
    Mar
    2013
    7:53pm, EDT

    Obama, EPA to unveil proposal to clean up emissions

    By Dina Cappiello, Associated Press

    The Obama administration will unveil a proposal Friday to clean up gasoline and automobile emissions, a step that officials say will result in cleaner air across the U.S. and slightly higher prices at the pump.

    The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that the rule to reduce sulfur in gasoline and tighten emissions standards on cars beginning in 2017 could increase gas prices by less than a penny per gallon and add $130 to the cost of a vehicle in 2025.

    But the agency says it will yield billions of dollars in health benefits by slashing smog- and soot-forming pollution come 2030.

    The oil industry, Republicans and some Democrats had pressed the EPA to delay the rule, citing higher costs. An oil industry study says the rule could increase gasoline prices by 6 to 9 cents per gallon.

    The so-called Tier 3 standards would reduce sulfur in gasoline by more than 60 percent and reduce nitrogen oxides by 80 percent, by expanding across the country a standard already in place in California. For states, the regulation will make it easier to comply with health-based standards for the main ingredient in smog and soot. For automakers, the regulation allows them to sell the same autos in all 50 states.

    Environmentalists hailed the proposal as potentially the most significant in President Barack Obama's second term.

    The Obama administration has already moved to clean up motor vehicles by adopting rules that will double fuel efficiency and putting in place the first-ever standards to reduce the pollution blamed for global warming from cars and trucks.

    "We know of no other air pollution control strategy that can achieve such substantial, cost-effective and immediate emission reductions," said Bill Becker, executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies. Becker said the rule would reduce pollution equal to taking 33 million cars off the road.

    But the head of American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, Charles Drevna, said in an interview Thursday that the refiners' group was still unclear on the motives behind the agency's regulation, since refining companies have already spent $10 billion to reduce sulfur by 90 percent. The additional cuts, while smaller, will cost just as much, Drevna said, and the energy needed for the additional refining could actually increase carbon pollution by 1 to 2 percent.

    "I haven't seen an EPA rule on fuels that has come out since 1995 that hasn't said it would cost only a penny or two more," Drevna said.

    A study commissioned by the American Petroleum Institute estimated that lowering the sulfur in gasoline would add 6 to 9 cents per gallon to refiners' manufacturing costs, an increase that would likely be passed down to consumers at the pump. The EPA estimate of less than 1 cent is also an additional manufacturing cost and likely to be passed on.

    A senior administration official said Thursday that only 16 of 111 refineries would need to invest in major equipment to meet the new standards, which could be final by the end of this year. Of the remaining refineries, 29 already are meeting the standards because they are selling cleaner fuel in California or other countries, and 66 would have to make modifications.

    The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the rule was still undergoing White House budget office review.

    © 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    56 comments

    A headline with the name "Obama" in it. Here we go, ...just more fuel for the regular whackadoodle members of the Newsvine "Obama Is Trying To Destroy America" glee club (none of whom will even read the article before posting their hateful vitriol).

    Show more
    Explore related topics: epa, pollution, environment, obama
  • 26
    Mar
    2013
    6:47am, EDT

    NJ toenail clippings to be tested for toxic metal spotlighted by Erin Brockovich

    Julio Cortez / AP

    Wind blows through a tarp hanging from a fence surrounding an industrial site in Garfield, N.J. where toxic chromium was spilled in 1983.

    By Noreen O'Donnell, Reuters

    Scientists plan to check toenail clippings in Garfield, New Jersey, to determine if residents were exposed to a toxic metal made infamous in California by environmental activist Erin Brockovich.

    Chromium, linked to lung cancer, leaked from the now-demolished EC Electroplating Inc. factory and polluted groundwater in a 1983 incident.

    Located 12 miles west of New York City, the area is on the federal Superfund list of hazardous waste sites. Some 30,000 people live in Garfield.

    "Concentrations in the groundwater, et cetera, are very high," Judith Zelikoff, a professor of environmental medicine at the New York University School of Medicine, told Reuters on Monday.

    In the 1983 incident, more than 3,600 gallons of a chemical solution containing chromium were discharged from a tank at the factory, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    The solution got into the groundwater, which flows toward the Passaic River, about 2,500 feet west of the site.

    The city's drinking water comes from a different source and is not contaminated.

    The plume is about three quarters of a mile long and slightly more than an eighth of a mile wide, said Rich Puvogel, a project manager with the EPA.

    Detecting chromium in groundwater, soil and homes does not necessarily mean that people were exposed, Zelikoff said.

    "We hope to be able to relieve their anxiety," said Zelikoff, noting that scientists will begin recruiting volunteers for the toenail clippings within the next three weeks.

    Toenails grow slowly and may help to detect chronic exposure, she said.

    Very high levels of chromium were found at the factory - approximately 80,000 parts per billion, Puvogel said. Downstream from the site, the levels drop off by several orders of magnitude, he said. New Jersey sets a limit of 70 parts per billion.

    The residents' exposure would have come from inhaling or touching chromium that had seeped into their basements, especially during flooding.

    "When the water dries, it also leaves a chromium dust residue," Zelikoff said.

    Environmental activist Erin Brockovich and her team of lawyers are working to help Louisiana residents displaced by massive sinkhole. WVLA's Kris Cusanza reports.

    Inhaled chromium is a carcinogen that increases the risk of lung cancer, according to the EPA.

    Scientists, who became aware of the contamination last year, want to test up to 250 residents, including some who live directly above the plume and a control group living at least three miles away, Zelikoff said.

    Residents who agree to submit toenail clippings will receive kits containing stainless-steel clippers and instructions. They must be between 18 and 65 and cannot have taken chromium supplements or be smokers.

    Last year the EPA removed more than 753 containers and drums of industrial waste from the factory and 6,100 gallons of chromium-contaminated water. The building was demolished in October.

    Next week the agency will start sampling the soil at the site to determine what sources of contamination remain. 

    Erin Brockovich, a law firm assistant turned campaigner, rallied residents in a California desert town to sue Pacific Gas & Electric over a pollution incident - a battle that formed the basis for a 2000 movie in her name starring Julia Roberts.

     

    Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

    56 comments

    Instead of rebuilding Afganistan or the rest of the world, how about cleaning up our own country ?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: business, epa, life, pollution, new-jersey, environment, us-news, featured, erin-brockovich
  • 28
    Oct
    2012
    10:17am, EDT

    N.C. neighbors aghast to learn drinking water contaminated for years

    By Charlotte Huffman , WNCN/News-17

    WAKE FOREST, N.C. -- A Wake Forest community is in an uproar after learning the state of North Carolina knew a resident’s water had been contaminated with toxic chemicals and failed to alert other residents for more than six years.

    “It makes me feel horrible,” homeowner Michele Hamilton said of unknowingly giving the toxic water to her kids. “They’re the most important things to me.”


    The EPA called families in the community this past summer, saying their water is contaminated with a cancer-causing chemical called trichloroethylene, or TCE, and to not drink, bathe or cook with the water.

    “I remember where we were when we got the phone call - we were on vacation this summer with our family,” Hamilton said.

    Neighbors Monica Stonefield and Frances Cuda got the same call.

    “Of course we were frightened and scared,” Stonefield said.

    “I was very nervous,” Cuda said. “I think anybody would be.”

    Within days of the calls to homeowners, the EPA set up an emergency command post and placed safe water on their doorsteps regularly. The EPA installed water filters in the homes with contamination levels above the EPA’s safety standard. And the EPA called a community meeting to explain what neighbors had been drinking.

    Gerald LeBlanc, the head of N.C. State University’s Department of Environmental and molecular toxicology, said TCE is a chemical that cleaning industries have used for years to remove grease. It is cheap, highly effective – and very toxic.

    “Based upon animal studies, we know that it has the ability to do harm,” LeBlanc said.

    LeBlanc said TCE “has been known to cause cancer” specifically leukemia, breast cancer, lung cancer, and there are symptoms associated with TCE exposure that are like Parkinson’s disease.

    Cuda said she has Parkinson’s disease. She also said she has gotten cysts, including “a lot of them in this left breast.”

    Doctors have not confirmed it, but Cuda believes the development of many large cysts in her left breast and having Parkinson’s disease is due to TCE.

    Cuda said a neighbor died from breast cancer. “And you know, she was a lovely person,” Cuda said. “She was in her 50s.”

    The problem dates back to 10 years ago, where circuit boards were cleaned with the toxin inside a shed on Stony Hill Road in Wake Forest. The TCE exited the building through a pipe and poured straight onto the ground. About three years later, the chemical showed up in a well at the house next door.

    At the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Charlotte Jesneck’s division took the case.

    “It looked to be that the contamination was confined to that well,” Jesneck said.

    So in 2005, DENR moved on.

    Through a Freedom of Information Act, NBC-17 obtained 800 pages from DENR’s files. Inside those pages, NBC-17 found dozens of red flags, including a two-page summary sent from DENR staff to senior managers in 2008 saying, “There are other wells along Stony Hill Road that should be sampled to check their status.”

    Also in 2008 was a DENR letter, where the department admitted “the extent of the contamination has not been defined.”

    Larry Kusan is an engineer and resident living near the contamination. In 2008, he learned about the contamination that happened in 2005 and was concerned about the potential for the contamination to spread.

    “I wanted to make sure that my family wasn’t in trouble,” Kusan said in an interview. “Our home is about a mile away from that location.”

    Kusan said he was “shocked” by what he found.

    He wrote DENR and the governor’s office, saying, “The area is slated for significant expansion.”

    He noted, “It is the cost to human health that is of greatest concern.”

    He then demanded the situation be addressed, or said, “It will result in harm to some residents, current and future.”

    DENR admits those warning sat in their files for years because they were focused on “bigger issues.”

    Kusan called that a “missed opportunity.”

    While the contamination problem brewed underground the area became a popular residential community with several new housing developments.

    One resident, Stonefield, said, “We moved here to make a better life for our family.”

    Asked if DENR ever notified them of concerns, Stonefield said, “Never.”

    Cuda, too, couldn’t remember any official notices about the problem.

    Environmental engineer Jim Halley said it is reasonable to assume TCE will spread. TCE sinks because it is heavier than water and when it sinks into the groundwater it spreads through the water table and into nearby wells.

    “And that’s when we really start seeing problems with groundwater and drinking water contamination,” Halley said.

    DENR’s Jesneck, asked about TCE sinking and spreading, said, “There were higher risk sites on the radar at that time,” and they hoped it wouldn’t spread.

    The first time many neighbors learned of the contamination was this past June when DENR sent some neighbors a letter asking if they would like to have their wells sampled.

    “That’s not good enough,” Frank Cuda said. “You bring someone up in uniform, in a vehicle that you know represents them who says, ‘Excuse me. There is an emergency. I need to test your water.’”

    DENR called in the EPA for help.

    More from News-17: Cleaning up toxic mess will cost taxpayers

    By late August, the EPA had sampled about 100 wells. They found the TCE contamination had spread from the source nearly 500 acres and contaminated the wells of 21 families in the area.

    Mark Stonefield’s well tested positive for dangerous levels of TCE contamination.

    “I’m furious,” homeowner Stonefield said. “I’m very upset about it.  That’s the biggest problem I’ve had with this whole situation is the state knew about it in 2005. We bought this land in 2007 and built a house on it in 2008 and our kids have been drinking the water for over 4 years now and no one notified us there was even the possibility that the water could be contaminated.”

    Jesneck said, “We have a finite number of resources.”

    NBC-17 pointed out that it does not require any money to call residents and alert them about potential contamination in the area.

    “If we had all the resources in the world, it would be a fantastic thing to do,” Jesneck said. “But given the resources we are given, we have to work on the highest risk known problems first.”

    Jesneck added, “We had sites where people actually had detections in their water supply wells or living on contaminated soils. Those are higher priorities than people living near a contaminated site.”

    But in the Wake Forest community, that answer is not good enough.

    “I don’t care about funding,” said Cuda. “All I care about is that someone starts doing their job in the world!”

    Cuda pointed out that he drank the water daily for years.

    “That’s a lot of poison to put in your body for all those years,” he said.

    More from Open Channel: 

    • Plane truth: Millions spent on rarely used Gary, Ind., airport
    • Feds investigate phony letters telling Fla. voters they're not eligible to vote
    • 'Cash register justice'; private probation services face legal counterattack
    • Sunni radicals target Shiites to fan sectarian flames in Pakistan
    • Unstoppable hackers take out bank websites with next-gen 'botnets'
    • Ex-CIA agent pleads guilty to leaking identity of covert operative
    • 'Hurricane tort king' wires another $1 million to pro-Obama Super PAC
    • Tracking secretive opponent of Montana campaign finance laws
    • To fight obesity, WHO agency partners with soft drink, snack makers
    • Child sex abuse survivor on release of Boy Scout files: This 'empowers us'
    • US nonprofit 'names and shames' businesses to put bite into Iran sanctions 
    •  

     

    Follow Open Channel from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

    934 comments

    Basically someone washed circuit boards with a toxic chemical and just let the resulting poison leech into the ground. I guess ten years ago no one could have possibly know that this was a real problem for the ground water. Somebody ought to swing for this.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: water, pollution, wake-forest, north-carolina, featured, tce
  • 18
    Oct
    2012
    6:24pm, EDT

    Asbestos, 60 million pounds of debris dumped on farm leads to pollution convictions

    Department of Justice

    Some 60 million pounds of construction debris was dumped on this farm in Frankfort, N.Y.

    By Miguel Llanos, NBC News

    Where to dump 60 million pounds of demolition debris, much of it containing asbestos? How about an upstate New York farm that also has wetlands and runs along a river? That act led to the conviction this week of two men who now face years in prison and hefty fines. 

    A jury on Tuesday found Cross Nicastro, owner of the 28-acre farm on the Mohawk River in Frankfort, and Dominick Mazza, owner of a waste management company, guilty of violating the Clean Water Act.

    The debris came from New Jersey rubbish that was put through an industrial shredding machine without the asbestos first being removed.

    The defendants "flouted numerous federal laws designed to protect Americans from exposure to toxic materials when they dumped asbestos-contaminated waste into an area that included sensitive wetlands," Assistant U.S. Attorney General Ignacia Moreno said in a statement.


    "They also committed fraud and lied to federal investigators in the process," she added.

    The two were also convicted of violating the Superfund law’s requirement to report the release of toxic materials and obstructing justice.


    WKTV.com reports last year on the asbestos dumping charges

    Mazza was also convicted of making false statements to special agents with the Environmental Protection Agency.      

    The men "concealed the illegal dumping by fabricating a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) permit and forging the name of a DEC official on the fraudulent permit," the Justice Department stated.

    Mazza's company also "obstructed justice by destroying and concealing documents responsive to a grand jury subpoena."

    Investigators were tipped off by a dump truck driver who was suspicious about what was happening at the farm.

    Department of Justice

    Some of the construction debris found on the farm in Frankfort, N.Y.

    Syracuse.com cited Assistant U.S. Attorney Craig Benedict as saying that when agents arrived they found bicycle marks atop the flattened debris piles, indicating local children had been using it as a playground.

    Some 430 loads were dumped, Benedict said, and evidence showed the plan was to go on for another five years.

    Nicastro faces up to five years in prison and fines, while Mazza could see up to 20 years in prison due to the obstruction of justice conviction.

    A sentencing date for the men has yet to be set. 

    Three others had previously been convicted for their role in the dumping, which happened in 2006.

    Nicastro planned to eventually convert the site into commercial riverfront property, Benedict said.

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • U.S. nonprofit 'names and shames' businesses to put bite into Iran sanctions
    • Same-sex marriage supporters rack up large war chests in state battles
    • Snakes in an SUV: Thief steals vehicle full of reptiles
    • Some chimps to be removed from federal research, but where will they go?
    • Video: How dangerous was NYC bomb plot suspect?
    • Ocelots, pro baseball pitcher and pipeline builder tangled up in lawsuit

    Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

     

    69 comments

    Another story of horrendous consequence, which will just fade away, swept under the carpet, so to speak. Sure hope I am wrong. It is a testament to the dump truck driver's suspicions and the follow up by the Feds that this case ever was pursued. Those crying for the removal of Protective Regulations …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: pollution, environment, asbestos
  • 12
    Oct
    2012
    1:06pm, EDT

    Trash-hunting robotic submarine dives into Chicago River

    View more videos at: http://nbcchicago.com.

    By Miguel Llanos, NBC News

    A small, remote-controlled submarine fetching trash in the Chicago River won't be able to clean it up on its own -- after all it only has one claw -- but the contraption is part of a long-term plan to do so, and it's also a gee-whiz way to educate locals about the bigger pollution picture. 


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    The sub "is a way to clean up but also to connect people to the underwater world right at their feet so they can see the trash and the creatures and, ultimately, become better stewards of our ocean, lakes and rivers," Rachael Miller told NBC News in describing the robot used by her environmental group, the Rozalia Project.


    The trash collector has been deployed across the Northeast and this week was in Chicago. The Rozalia Project uses an underwater camera to show locals what's under the water -- in Chicago's case, beer cans, a deck chair and lots of other trash.

    And while the robot is small, it's claw "can pull out 75 pounds worth of stuff," said Miller.

    NBCChicago.com

    A can is retrieved from the Chicago River by the Rozalia Project's remote-controlled submarine.

    This year alone, 420,000 pieces of trash weighing 72 tons have been pulled out of rivers, lakes and seas with the Rozalia Project's help, Miller said. It's not just the sub plucking trash, but surface nets and volunteers on shore.

    The items are mostly junk like lost fishing gear, but include a few treasures like an 1800s moonshine jug found in Indiana and a Navy ship anchor found in Narragansett Bay in Rhode Island.

    Next stops for the submarine include Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco and Santa Cruz in November.

    Chicago, for its part, this year embarked on a $10 million cleanup of its river, with help from the state and the federal Environmental Protection Agency.

    Mayor Rahm Emanuel this week also unveiled plans to expand the city's Riverwalk another six blocks, calling the river the "city’s next recreational frontier," NBCChicago.com reported.

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Ex-Connecticut firefighter pleads guilty to 1986 fatal arson
    • Maryland boy, 4, injured but alive after fall from 9th-story window
    • Video: Aggressive Biden on the attack in Ryan debate
    • Two toddlers critically injured in attack by aunt's Rottweilers
    • Panetta: Cyber intruders have already infiltrated US systems
    • Dottie Sandusky in letter to judge: 'Jerry is not the monster'

    Follow US news from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

     

    19 comments

    An expensive toy. Besides, its Chicago's politicians that are the REAL trash that needs to be cleaned up.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: chicago, pollution, environment
  • 14
    Sep
    2012
    1:08pm, EDT

    Tsunami debris adds new element to 'Coastal Cleanup' day

    The trash accumulating in the Pacific Ocean – scientists estimate there are 1.5 million tons of tsunami debris alone -- is arriving on the West Coast. NBC's Miguel Almaguer reports.

    By Miguel Llanos, NBC News

    Thousands of volunteers were taking to West Coast beaches on Saturday for the 27th annual "Coastal Cleanup", and this year they have new instructions: keep an eye out for any Japanese tsunami debris.

    Ocean Conservancy

    This flyer is being handed out Saturday along West Coast beaches.

    "DO NOT touch or attempt to remove any potentially hazardous materials or large debris items," states a field guide prepared by Ocean Conservancy, which organizes the annual, and international, beach event. 

    Instead, volunteers are urged to call 911 if it's an immediate danger, or the federal tsunami removal program by e-mailing information to disasterdebris@noaa.gov. 


    The group also hopes to total up any tsunami debris found, marking those "in the 'Items of Local Concern' section — so we can compare data collected this year to historical numbers," Katie Cline, a spokeswoman for Ocean Conservancy, told NBC News. "Will we see a difference in the type of debris found? This is a question we hope to determine using the data."

    Already this year, several large items from Japan's 2011 tsunami have landed on West Coast beaches — among them a boat found on Canada's Spring Island, northwest of Vancouver Island, in August; a 66-foot-long floating dock that washed onto an Oregon beach in June; and a Harley-Davidson motorcycle found on Canada's Graham Island in April. 

    Japan estimates 5 million tons of debris was swept out to sea by the tsunami, and about 1.5 million tons of that is likely still in the Pacific Ocean.

    Even without tsunami debris, cleanup volunteers are likely to be busy on Saturday.

    Last year, nearly 600,000 people picked up more than 9 million pounds of trash during the cleanup held on 20,000 miles of beaches around the world, Ocean Conservancy said.

    "We need more volunteers than ever," David Pittenger, who runs the group's trash program, said in a statement announcing this year's effort. "Last year, volunteers found enough food packaging to get takeout for breakfast, lunch and dinner every day for the next 858 years."

    Other items disposed of last year included 267,000 articles of clothing and more than 24,000 light bulbs, the conservation group noted.

    One community that already knows what it will be cleaning up Saturday is Encinitas, Calif., where decades-old vehicle parts and other junk were recently found in the water of a protected lagoon, NBCSanDiego.com reported.

    View more videos at: http://nbcsandiego.com.

    To see where cleanups are being held Saturday around the world, check out the interactive map created by Ocean Conservancy at signuptocleanup.org. 

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Family of 77-year-old dragged from car demand apology from Texas cop
    • Ex-Navy SEAL killed in Libya attack a highly trained pilot, marksman
    • 'I don't want to die': NJ supermarket shooting terror laid out in 911 calls
    • Cops set up cameras to watch the cameras that watch you
    • Video: Anti-American protests continue in Egypt
    • 73-year-old birdwatcher: I was raped in New York's Central Park

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    13 comments

    What an oppurtunity to go out salvaging. I am certain that there is a wealth of treasure in what is called Tsunami junk. Just think you could find a can or other object with Japanese writing on it that came from another country. You might never get to Japan but you could find something in the afterm …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: japan, tsunami, pollution, environment, beaches
  • 12
    Sep
    2012
    10:30am, EDT

    That Southern Calif. smell? 'Solid evidence' it came from Salton Sea

    By Melissa Pamer and Rosa Ordaz, NBCLosAngeles.com

    Testing of air samples from locations in the Inland Empire and around the Salton Sea appear to have revealed the cause of a sulfur odor that fouled the air in areas of Southern California Monday.

    As suspected, the culprit was likely the Salton Sea, a large saltwater lake about 150 miles east of Los Angeles that often has decaying fish and algae on its shores.

    The South Coast Air Quality Management District said it had taken samples from 10 locations in the Inland Empire, Coachella Valley and near the Salton Sea. The samples showed a progression of hydrogen sulfide levels that were strongest near the sea.


    "We now have solid evidence that clearly points to the Salton Sea as the source of a very large and unusual odor event," said Barry Wallerstein, executive director of the district, which oversees air quality in much of Southern California.

    AQMD had suspected the 376-square-mile body of water as the source of the smell, but air district officials said late Monday that more investigation was needed to be certain about the cause of the rotten-egg odor.

    Inspectors were in the field Monday in the San Fernando Valley, Long Beach, Colton, San Bernardino, Riverside, Perris, Temecula, Banning, Palm Springs, La Quinta and the Salton Sea, the agency said.

    They found decreasing concentrations of hydrogen sulfide as distance grew from the Salton Sea.

    The chemical compound, which is a product of organic decay such as that which occurs at the sea, has an "unmistakable rotten-egg odor," according to a press release issued by AQMD Tuesday evening.

    The Salton Sea has regular massive fish kills in its waters, which are often polluted with pesticide runoff from nearby agricultural operations.

    More from NBCLA: Video shows woman trying to steal from disabled person

    The agency said it ruled out other potential sources of the smell such as landfills and oil refineries. An examination of recent weather patterns showed the smelly air could have traveled such a long distances, the air district said.

    AQMD had received about 235 complaints about the odor Monday, and just about a dozen overnight and Tuesday morning. The strong stench, however, could be easily detected in some parts of central Los Angeles late Tuesday night. 

    Thunderstorms around the Salton Sea and high winds could have stirred up bacteria-laden water from the bottom of the sea, pushing the odor more than 100 miles to the Los Angeles region, the air district said.

    "Winds from the southeast of at least 50 mph pushed odors from the Salton Sea to the northwest – across the Coachella Valley, through the Banning Pass and across the Los Angeles Basin," the AQMD said in a statement.

    An onshore breeze from the west has since kept odors at bay.

    Late Monday, Wallerstein said it was "highly unusual for odors to remain strong up to 150 miles from their source." 

    The agency said the high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide were not enough to cause "irreversible harm to human health."

    Follow NBCLA for the latest LA news, events and entertainment: iPhone/iPad App | Facebook | Twitter | Google+ | Instagram | RSS | Text Alerts | Email Alerts

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Evidence shows White House got many pre-9/11 warnings
    • FAO: VA struggles to calculate lost wages for wounded vets
    • Key question in Chicago strike: How do you measure a teacher
    • Professor in Ala. university shooting rampage pleads guilty
    • Jailbird ex-cops talk about Drew Peterson's fate in prison
    • Video: New footage released of Sikh temple shooting
    • Cops: Woman kills husband, mistaking him for intruder

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook


    49 comments

    The earthquake idea has merit but you lessen the point with the racist comment. If one would check, the south western USA was owned by Mexico in the past. Note the Spanish names of all your cities. Racism lessens all those who practice it. Better to stay on point.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: pollution, environment, salton-sea
  • 7
    Sep
    2012
    10:35am, EDT

    Concord, Mass., the first US city to ban sale of plastic water bottles

    By Miguel Llanos, NBC News

    Bans on plastic bags have taken root in communities across the country, but banning the sale of water in plastic bottles? The town of Concord, Mass., is in line to be the first in the nation to do just that, now that the state’s attorney general has signed off. The bottled water industry, for its part, is considering a lawsuit. 


    Follow @NBCNewsUS

    Championed by an 84-year-old resident during a three-year battle, the law bans the sale of single-serving PET water bottles of one liter or less starting on Jan. 1 in Concord, population 18,000.

    A first offense comes with a warning, followed by $25 for second offense and $50 for any beyond that, the Boston Globe reported. It does, however, allow for an exemption during emergencies.


    Jean Hill, the Concord resident behind ban, told The Boston Globe that she was relieved after three years of work. 

    "I hope other towns will follow,’" Hill said. "I feel bottled water is a waste of money."

    The state's attorney general initially shot down the proposed ban, but on Wednesday signed off after it was revised last year and it was approved last April by town residents in a 403-364 vote. 

    In a letter to Concord, state Attorney General Martha Coakley said she was confident the law could stand up in court, citing a case where the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Minnesota law that banned the sale of milk in non-returnable, non-refillable plastic containers. That law was passed in order to reduce the generation of solid waste.

    The bottled water industry vowed to fight back, possibly in court. 

    "We are exploring all available options,"  the Virginia-based International Bottled Water Association said in a statement.

    "This ban deprives residents of the option to choose their choice of beverage and visitors, who come to this birthplace of American independence, a basic freedom gifted to them by the actions in this town more than 200 years ago," the group added, noting Concord's place in U.S. history. "It will also deprive the town of needed tax revenue and harm local businesses that rely on bottled water sales."

    The activist group Ban The Bottle welcomed Concord's move, calling it the first of its kind in the U.S.

    Some other cities "are taking steps to curb bottled water sales, but only in city and municipal buildings," the group's Tomas Bosque told NBC News. Several universities have done so as well.

    San Francisco is considering an ordinance that would require owners of new and renovated buildings to install filling stations, he said, and the city already has such stations at various parks, schools and its airport.

    Bundanoon, an Australian town, enacted a ban in 2009 and believes it was the first government to do so anywhere.

    More content from NBCNews.com:

    • Drew Peterson found guilty of killing third wife, Kathleen Savio
    • Judge rules Fort Hood shooting suspect must be 'forcibly shaved'
    • Hurricane Michael becomes year's first Category 3 storm; Leslie eyes Bermuda
    • 4 dead after school bus collides with semi-truck in Nebraska
    • Video: Guilty pleas entered in Ohio bridge bomb plot

    Follow US News from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook

    425 comments

    But they will allow plastic bottles for soda? That is not consistent. How about going back to the 5 cent deposit for all plastic bottles?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: pollution, environment, plastic, featured, bottled-water
  • 15
    Jun
    2012
    11:23am, EDT

    Obama administration proposes tougher rules on soot pollution

    AP

    Coal-fired power plants like this one in Thompsons, Texas, emit soot and other pollutants when coal is burned to make electricity.

    By Miguel Llanos, NBC News

    In another case of environmental rules becoming election fodder, the Obama administration on Friday proposed tighter restrictions on soot, a pollutant caused mainly by smokestacks and diesel engines. 


    Follow @msnbc_us

    It had been called "the sleeping giant of clean-air issues" by Frank O'Donnell, head of the activist group Clean Air Watch. And while little was made of it until now, Republicans and industry were quick to pounce on it as more red tape in a weak economy.

    The proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule would set the maximum allowable standard for soot in a range of 12 to 13 micrograms per cubic meter of air. The current annual standard, last revised in 1997, is 15 micrograms per cubic meter. 


    The EPA had delayed its required review of the Clean Air Act's soot provision, leading New York, California and nine other states to sue. Under a court order, the EPA agreed to unveil its proposal this week.

    O'Donnell was not impressed with EPA's pace. "EPA had to be dragged kicking and screaming to do this," O'Donnell told msnbc.com, referring to the lawsuit. The states, along with activists and the American Lung Association, argued that tougher standards will reduce premature deaths and asthma attacks.

    "Clean air is not a luxury," New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said after a court ordered the EPA to act. "It is a basic public right, and standards that protect it are an absolute necessity."

    The proposal follows the World Health Organization's declaration on Tuesday that diesel fumes can cause cancer.

    The risk is small, a WHO science panel noted, but raising the status to carcinogen from "probable carcinogen" was an important shift because so many people breathe in the fumes in some way.

    "It's on the same order of magnitude" as secondhand smoke, said Kurt Straif, director of the WHO department that evaluates cancer risks. "This could be another big push for countries to clean up exhaust from diesel engines." 

    That finding, O'Donnell argued, "is all the more reason EPA needs to get tough on particle soot."

    Republicans, for their part, in recent months have seized as election fodder the argument that environmental regulations are strangling economic recovery.

    House Energy Committee Chairman Fred Upton, R-Mich., reiterated that in a letter to EPA chief Lisa Jackson last week, saying that "stringent standards" on soot "will likely be costly and have significant regulatory and other implications."

    The American Petroleum Institute agreed. "By continuing to implement the existing standards we would avoid the potentially heavy added economic costs of more stringent standards, which our economy and American workers cannot afford," spokesman Howard Feldman told reporters Tuesday.

    The EPA countered that soot pollution has already been reduced since the last rule revision in 1997 and that the proposed standard is more of a formality. 

    All but six counties across the country would meet the proposed standard by 2020 with no additional actions needed beyond compliance with existing and pending rules, the EPA said.

    Those counties are San Bernardino and Riverside counties in California; Santa Cruz County, Arizona; Wayne County, Mich.; Jefferson County, Ala. and Lincoln County, Mont. All six face "unique challenges" and will receive individual attention, the EPA added.

    Still, Bill Becker, head of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, told msnbc.com that "meeting the standards could be far more challenging" for some counties than others, and he urged the EPA and Congress to provide resources to enforce any new standard.

    As for enforcing a new rule, Becker noted that "today’s proposal is an ‘ambient’ standard, not an emission limit on industry." Any state with a county consistently above the standard would be required to draft a strategy to curb emissions, he added, and that could then "trigger additional controls on industry."

    After a public comment period, a final rule is expected in December.

    The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Suspected military plane wreck, bones found on Alaska glacier
    • 'Bad deal' lump pension payouts for veterans draw new scrutiny
    • North Carolina lawmakers move to scale back Racial Justice Act
    • Video: 911 call reports kid behind the wheel
    • Cops: Parents left 2 kids bound, blindfolded in Wal-Mart lot

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    138 comments

    Thank you my main man OBAMA! Now that I am unemployed with debt up to my ears thanks to your stimuli! A home that is worth 50% of its top value.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: epa, pollution, environment, featured, miguel-llanos
  • 31
    May
    2012
    6:12pm, EDT

    EPA planes spying on ranchers? Lawmakers want answers

    EPA

    A Maine dairy farm's manure lagoon is seen leaking into a stream. The Environmental Protection Agency says its overflights of farms and ranches help detect pollution like this 2006 case.

    By Miguel Llanos, NBC News

    A Nebraska cattlemen’s group is pushing the Environmental Protection Agency to stop pollution-control flights over ranches, claiming it amounts to spying on citizens. EPA, meanwhile, says the flights are an effective way to quickly spot -- and stop -- pollution from manure lagoons and other waste at large livestock operations.

    Nebraska's five federal lawmakers joined the fight this week, demanding to know on what authority EPA is flying over and photographing private property. The lawmakers sent their demands to EPA chief Lisa Jackson on Tuesday, listing a battery of questions and demanding answers by June 10. 


    Follow @msnbc_us

    EPA has been operating these flights across the country for nearly 10 years. 


    "These operations are in many cases near homes, and landowners deserve legitimate justification given the sensitivity of the information gathered by the flyovers," Rep. Adrian Smith, R-Neb., said in a statement. "Nebraskans are rightfully skeptical of an agency which continues to unilaterally insert itself into the affairs of Rural America."

    The issue was brought to the lawmakers' attention by Nebraska Cattlemen, which represents the state's beef producers.

    "The same ends could be accomplished by picking up a phone, sending an email, talking to a producer in person," Kristen Hassebrook, the group's environmental affairs director, told msnbc.com. "There is no need to spy on citizens."

    "Another frustration," she added, is that "EPA does not alert livestock producers that the flight will occur or has occurred."

    The flights, she insists, found "few potential issues" and EPA usually misinterpreted what was happening on the ground or photographed something that Nebraska regulators were already aware of and working with ranchers on. 

    EPA plans to respond to lawmakers' questions by June 10. Spokesman Ben Washburn emphasized that the flights help "minimize costs and reduce the number of on-site inspections across the country."

    "In no case," he added, "has EPA taken an enforcement action solely on the basis of these overflights."

    EPA met with cattlemen in eastern Nebraska in March to address concerns.

    Ron Coufal, who represents cattle feeders in Cuming County, told Brownfield Ag News his concerns were allayed after seeing the photos.

    "I can see that it probably is saving our government money by having the overflights and not going to every feedlot to see if they’re in compliance," he said.

    Hassebrook says privacy is the bigger issue. 

    "Someone’s home, their children’s playground, their decks where they have family parties, are generally right there, smack dab in the middle of their business" and EPA cameras, she said. "Even if it’s not their (EPA’s) primary focus, you still have privacy rights in your home -- so I have serious reservations as to whether or not they should be taking such photos."

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • New tests shed no light on 'burning rocks' mystery
    • Teen in Mexico due to ‘Leap Day’ error can return home
    • EPA planes spying on ranchers? Lawmakers want answers
    • Video: IRS mistakenly sends waitress $400K refund
    • Video purportedly shows NYC student making out with his teacher
    • Man interviews for job, ends up getting detained for 1975 murder

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

     

    316 comments

    When you have enough animals you need to have a lagoon to contain all the CRAP then you no longer count as a "family" farm or a "private residence." You are a "factory farm" and need to be monitored to prevent an entire swath of land from being ruined by your greedy negligence.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: epa, pollution, environment, cattle, featured, miguel-llanos
  • 23
    May
    2012
    6:10pm, EDT

    LA becomes largest US city to ban single-use plastic bags

    Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images

    The Ralphs supermarket chain is among those impacted by a plastic and paper bag ban approved Wednesday in Los Angeles. Many neighboring jurisdictions already have similar bans in place.

    By Miguel Llanos, NBC News

    Withstanding a strong lobby from the plastic bag industry, the Los Angeles City Council on Wednesday overwhelmingly approved a ban on single-use plastic bags at checkout counters as well as a 10-cent fee on paper bags.


    Follow @msnbc_us

    With a population of 4 million -- and using an estimated 2.7 billion plastic bags each year -- Los Angeles becomes the largest city in the U.S. to enact a ban and joins 47 other cities in California alone. 

    "This is a tipping point" for banning plastic bags around the world, City Councilman Paul Koretz, a ban sponsor, declared just before the 13-1 vote.


    The industry counters that the ban will be bad for the environment and health and will cost local jobs.

    Reusable bags "are hazardous because consumers seldom wash them, and they have been found to transport bacteria," Mark Daniels, chair of the American Progressive Bag Alliance, told msnbc.com, citing a case earlier this month of girls getting norovirus from cookies left in a reusable bag.

    "Plastic bags make up a fraction a percent of the litter stream," Daniels added, citing a 2009 litter survey. "A policy to target and ban one product will not address the root issue" of pollution.

    City staff countered at Wednesday's meeting that 43 percent of Los Angeles' trash is plastic and that the largest component of that plastic is plastic bags at 19 percent.

    Daniels added that "reusables cannot be recycled" but city staff insisted standards would be adopted to make that a requirement.

    As for jobs, city staff noted that the 750 jobs at companies making plastic bags in the area are not in the city, but in the county.

    Large stores are allowed to phase out plastic bags over six months and then provide free paper bags for another six months. Small retailers will have a year to phase out plastic.

    After a year, retailers will be allowed to charge 10 cents for paper bags -- a "disincentive" designed to steer consumers to reusable bags.

    The council did back away from also banning paper bags, which would have made it the only city to ban both plastic and paper.

    Koretz said the city would study the issue again in two years to see whether the 10 cent fee was enough to reduce paper bags.

    The city ban was modeled on one enacted by Los Angeles County, with a population of 10 million. A state court is hearing an appeal in a lawsuit against the county ban after the plaintiffs, a plastic bag maker among them, lost a lower court ruling.

    Story: Bag ban taking shape across Hawaii
    Interactive: The paper or plastic debate 

    City Council members who supported the ban noted that the vote was about creating environmental awareness among Angelenos.

    "Let's not stop with plastic bags," said Councilman Richard Alarcon. 

    The ban will go into effect after a standard environmental review, which is expected to take four months.

    More content from msnbc.com and NBC News:

    • Senators grill Secret Service boss on prostitution scandal
    • Man arrested for drunk driving with zebra, parrot in truck
    • Staff bled $44 million in gifts from heiress, suit says
    • Utah man: Roommates tortured me with power tool, knives

    Follow US News on msnbc.com on Twitter and Facebook

     

    315 comments

    All you can do is laugh at California. Its amazing those law makers walk upright. At least I think they do....sigh

    Show more
    Explore related topics: pollution, environment, recycling, plastic-bags
  • 3
    May
    2012
    12:01pm, EDT

    EPA orders Utah to cut haze across national parks

    Ethan Miller / Getty Images

    An aerial view of sandstone formations May 2, in Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah.

    AP reports -- SALT LAKE CITY -- A U.S. Environmental Protection Agency order will require two of Utah's oldest coal-fired power plants to improve control of pollution that has drastically reduced visibility across a region that includes five national parks and redrock wilderness.

    Pollution controls at a pair of PacifiCorp power plants in Emery County "do not comply with our regulations," EPA Regional Administrator James Martin wrote earlier this week in the 79-page order. He signed out the 34- and 42-year-old plants for improvement, rejecting Utah's less stringent pollution controls but upholding broader efforts by the state to reduce haze across southern Utah.

    PacifiCorp said it was already upgrading pollution controls at the Hunter and Huntington power plants and planned more improvements by 2014 that would bring them into compliance with the new requirements.

    Read the full story.

    Ethan Miller / Getty Images

    An aerial view of sandstone formations May 2, in Bryce Canyon National Park, Utah.

    Slideshow: America's national parks

    Nearly 400 national parks can be found all across America, and feature breathtaking vistas, rock formations millions of years old, and more.

    Launch slideshow

    Follow @msnbc_pictures

    329 comments

    Yeah, Lou. You'd much prefer lead in your drinking water and air you can see before you breathe it, right?

    Show more
    Explore related topics: pollution, environment, national-parks, utah, bryce-canyon
Older posts

Browse

  • featured,
  • crime,
  • military,
  • weather,
  • california,
  • updated,
  • florida,
  • environment,
  • us-news,
  • shooting,
  • new-york,
  • texas,
  • education,
  • chicago,
  • police,
  • gulf-oil-spill,
  • kari-huus,
  • nbcnewyork,
  • los-angeles,
  • murder,
  • new-jersey,
  • guns,
  • obama,
  • afghanistan,
  • colorado,
  • sandy,
  • nbclosangeles,
  • trayvon-martin,
  • barack-obama,
  • crime-and-courts,
  • politics,
  • gay,
  • veterans,
  • connecticut,
  • fire,
  • arizona,
  • crime-courts,
  • religion,
  • boston-marathon-tragedy
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Miguel Llanos

I'm the environment and weather editor for msnbc.com, and hope to discuss issues and events with the newsvine community as well as to invite experts into those discussions.

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (323)
    • April (608)
    • March (548)
    • February (510)
    • January (563)
  • 2012
    • December (457)
    • November (460)
    • October (477)
    • September (432)
    • August (525)
    • July (519)
    • June (508)
    • May (566)
    • April (538)
    • March (576)
    • February (471)
    • January (417)
  • 2011
    • December (455)
    • November (190)
    • October (9)
    • September (3)
    • August (51)
    • July (8)
    • June (3)
    • May (12)
    • April (5)
    • March (3)
    • February (1)
    • January (8)
  • 2010
    • December (5)
    • November (1)
    • October (2)
    • September (28)
    • August (40)
    • July (35)
    • June (177)
    • May (50)
    • April (9)
    • March (2)
    • February (2)
    • January (4)
  • 2009
    • December (5)
    • November (5)
    • October (2)
    • September (11)
    • August (4)
    • July (12)
    • June (1)
    • May (1)
    • April (1)
    • March (3)
    • February (3)
    • January (2)
  • 2008
    • December (3)
    • November (2)
    • October (6)
    • September (30)
    • August (26)
    • July (10)
    • June (4)
    • May (8)
    • April (13)
    • March (9)
    • February (7)
    • January (6)
  • 2007
    • December (10)
    • November (6)
    • October (22)
    • September (11)

Most Commented

  • Obama calls IRS flap 'inexcusable,' announces resignation of acting IRS chief (3715)
  • Benghazi, IRS, AP: A guide to the 3 storms confronting the White House (2544)
  • Majority of Colorado sheriffs file suit against new gun laws (1949)
  • At least 51 killed, including 20 children, as tornado tears through Oklahoma (1806)
  • Judge blocks Arkansas' tough new abortion law (1879)
  • Jodi Arias pleads for jury to spare her life, says, 'I want everyone's pain to stop' (810)
  • Search and rescue winds down a day after deadly Oklahoma tornado (1571)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Cosmic Log
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • US news on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise